2. The Hydraulic Conductivity (Lp) Affects Ion Transport
The water flow through a plant decreases under salinity and affects the ion transport. Lu and Fricke
[11] investigated the root hydraulic conductivity (Lp) in wheat under different NaCl concentrations and found that the Lp of cortex cells was differently affected by NaCl concentrations under day and night, and in the main axis of roots and lateral roots. The aquaporin-inhibitor hydrogen peroxide (H
2O
2) reduced Lp during the night, suggesting that these proteins were important for hydraulic conductivity. The authors suggested that the changes in root Lp in response to salt stress depended on altered activity of aquaporins in root and leaves. However, aquaporins facilitate diffusion of H
2O
2 through cellular membranes. Therefore, it cannot be excluded that the Lp decrease is a side effect of cell membrane damage by reactive oxygen species (ROS). Aquaporins play key roles in the hydraulic regulation of other types of abiotic stress too. They are intrinsic protein channels mainly in plasma membranes, ER, vacuoles, and plastids, facilitating the diffusion of water and small neutral molecules, and dissolved gases like CO
2 and ammonia. Interestingly, aquaporins can be regulated by signaling intermediates, cytosolic Ca
2+, pH, and reactive oxygen species (ROS)
[12]. Genetically modified aquaporins could be future candidates for improving salt tolerance in plants.
3. Uptake of Na+ and Cl− at the Whole Plant Level
In most plant species, Na
+ and Cl
− can easily be absorbed by both the main root and lateral roots. The ions are transported through root hairs into the epidermis, cortex, endodermal cells, and into the parenchyma cells, layers of pericycle, and thereafter into the xylem for further passive transport by the transpiration stream in the shoot. Solutes and water can travel by the epidermis and cortex cells into the xylem in three ways: apoplastically by the cell walls and extracellular spaces, symplastically from cell to cell by cytoplasm and plasmodesmata, openings in the cell walls, and by a transmembrane pathway by plasma membranes and cell walls
[13]. The endodermal cells form a central ring structure where the radial walls are thickened (Casparin strips) with hydrophobic suberin that prevents apoplastic ion transport. In the symplastic pathway, ions have to pass through one or several membranes.
Kronzucker and Britto
[14] investigated which method plants used for the uptake of ions. The reports show that monocots, like wheat and rice, more often take up Na
+ and Cl
− by the apoplastic route. In rice, 50% of both Na
+ and Cl
− uptakes in the shoot were apoplastic
[14][15]. In
Arabidopsis and other dicots, some part of the ion uptake was significantly apoplastic. The solute permeability coefficients in
Arabidopsis and rice were rather similar. By the symplastic pathway, the ions have to pass through several different channels or transporter proteins.
4. Ion Uptake across a Membrane
The driving force for the movement of an ion across a membrane depends on two components: one electrical and one chemical, depending on differences in charges and ion activities across the membrane
[16].
Since the membrane potential difference across the plasma membrane is approximately −140 mV, a positive ion like Na
+ can easily pass into the cytosol even at low concentrations
[17].
5. Cellular Uptake of Na+
Na+ is transported into a plant cell by many different channels and transport proteins, such as nonselective cation channels, NSCCs, low-affinity cation transporter, LCT1, cation-chloride cotransporters, CCCs, high affinity-K+ transporters, HAKs, HKT1, HKT2, and the Shaker-type K channel, AKT1.
5.1. Cytosolic Uptake of Na+ in Wheat and Rice by NSCCs, CCCs, HKTs, and AKT
The cytosolic uptake of Na
+ in wheat and rice under salinity is mainly mediated by nonselective ion channels, NSCCs, but also by transport proteins
[3][14][18]. Monocots like wheat and rice use many different transporters. Davenport and Tester
[19] showed that the NSCCs are the primary pathways for Na
+ influx into wheat roots, as the influx is inhibited by Ca
2+, a mechanism that is considered specific for that type of channel. However, later reports suggested that both K
+ and Ca
2+ may inhibit Na
+ influx by NSCCs and also influx by LCT1
[14].
NSCCS are divided in depolarization-activated, hyperpolarization-activated, and voltage-insensitive channels. In barley, the voltage-insensitive NSCCs show both inward and outward currents
[20]. NSCCs can also be characterized and named by their ligands and stimuli as cyclic nucleotide gated channels, CNGCs
[21][22], and glutamate-like receptor proteins, GLRs
[23].
Except for NSCCs, Na
+ uptake can be mediated by cation-chloride cotransporters, CCCs, but other uptake mechanisms have been proposed as well. In wheat and rice, high-affinity K
+ transporters, HAKs, HKT1, HKT2, low-affinity cation transporter, LCT1, and the Shaker-type K channel, AKT1, were shown to transport sodium
[24][25], with references therein. In wheat, LCT1 was suggested to transport Ca
2+ and Cd
2+ [26]. In barley, HKTs were showed to improve salt tolerance, as overexpression caused increased tolerance
[27]. The HvHKT1;1 in barley showed a higher selectivity of K
+/Na
+ and a high retention of K
+ and Ca
2+ in root cells under salinity
[28].
More detailed information on Na
+ transporters is available
[14][23]. It can be concluded that, under salinity, Na
+ is mainly transported into cereals by NSCCs, HKTs, and HAKs.
5.2. Cytosolic Na+ Uptake in Arabidopsis
Results from experiments with
Arabidopsis, a dicot, suggest that NSCCs, such as CNGCs and GLRs
[3][22][29][30] but also HKTs and HAKs, can transport sodium under salt stress
[23]. The aquaporin, PIP2;1, was also shown to transport Na
+ [31].
6. Long-Distance Translocation of Sodium
6.1. Long-Distance Translocation of Sodium in Rice by HKTs
Many reports show that HKT1 mediates Na
+ translocation from roots to shoot in rice under salt stress. Cell-specific expression analysis by in situ PCR revealed that
HKT1 was induced in the root epidermis, vascular cylinder, and shoot mesophyll cells of the sensitive rice, indicating transport of Na
+ from root to shoot, where it is more damaging
[32].
HKT1 induction also occurred in the shoot phloem, in the transition from phloem to mesophyll, and in the mesophyll cells of rice, suggesting a recirculating of K
+ in the leaf. Horie et al.
[33] showed that HKT1 mediates Na
+ influx and transport, but not K
+ influx and transport, and that HKT2 might transport both Na
+ and K
+. In the tolerant rice, an induction of
OsHKT2 and
OsVHA was obtained in the root epidermis, exodermis, and xylem tissue, which indicates a K
+ and Na
+ uptake and transport through the root xylem
[32]. This cultivar could confer salt tolerance by decreasing the expression of
HKT1 and increasing the expression of
HKT2 in the shoot, leading to a low Na
+/K
+ concentration ratio, which is important for salt tolerance and ionic homeostasis
[34].
Investigations show that HKT1 does not transport Na
+ from root to shoot in all species. AtHKT1 in
Arabidopsis can prevent xylem loading and translocation to the shoot
[35], but in salt-sensitive rice, Na
+ is translocated to the shoot by OsHKT1
[32]. OsHKT1;5 is suggested to recirculate Na
+ by the phloem to the root tissue
[36][37].
6.2. Long-Distance Translocation of Sodium in Barley by HKTs
Different transport mechanisms of HKT1;5 were demonstrated in the cultivated barley
Hordeum vulgare and the halophyte ecotype
Hordeum marinum, as the halophyte took up less Na
+ into the shoot and higher K
+ into the root, compared with
Hordeum vulgare when subjected to 400 mM NaCl
[38]. Thus, the halophyte maintained a higher K
+/Na
+ ratio, and also used less energy for salt tolerance than the cultivated ecotype. In several investigations, salt tolerance in the halophyte barley
Hordeum maritimum was compared with salt tolerance in
Hordeum vulgare.
6.3. Long-Distance Translocation of Sodium in Arabidopsis by HKTs
An investigation in
Arabidopsis suggested that the high expression of
AtHKT1;1 in the mature part of the
Arabidopsis root stele decreased Na
+ accumulation into the shoot and increased salt tolerance
[39]. Moreover, other research on
Arabidopsis indicated that AtHKT1;1 controls the root accumulation of Na
+ and retrieves Na
+ from xylem but does not mediate root influx or recirculation in the phloem
[40].
6.4. The CCCs, Cation-Chloride Cotransporters
Loss-of-function experiments with CCCs showed that this protein can transport K
+, Na
+, and Cl
− in symport
[41]. CCCs are suggested to be involved in the long-distance translocation of Na
+ [42]. It is uncertain if the CCCs retain Na
+ and Cl
− at the xylem parenchyma cells, where CCCs are expressed, or translocate these ions into the xylem.
7. Salt Tolerance
7.1. Plants Tolerate Salt Stress by Different Mechanisms
Salinity stress in plants causes osmotic stress, Na
+ and Cl
+ toxicity, and negative effects on ion homeostasis, as a high salt concentration can decrease the uptake of K
+, Ca
2+, and NO
3 [25][43]. The osmotic stress is prior to the ionic stress and, in barley, more serious for the plant to combat than ionic stress, as it might be connected with the formation of ROS
[44]. Osmotic stress depends on the fact that the osmotic potential is more negative outside the roots than inside under a high salt concentration, which makes water uptake more difficult.
Plants have developed several mechanisms to resist salinity
[30][43]. The first minutes to days of osmotic stress cause a reduced water uptake and plant growth reduction. Plants can withstand the first phase by a reduction in cell expansion and closing their stomata; but under ionic stress, cytosolic Na
+ and Cl
− concentrations can be toxic and affect the metabolism to such a degree that after a long time may cause cell death.
As reported for barley, salt tolerance does not only depend on a low uptake of Na
+, but also on the plant’s ability to retain K
+ and Ca
2+ [28][45]. Plant might have a higher selectivity for K
+ over Na
+, by accumulating a low amount of Na
+ in root cells, and increase their K
+ concentration at high external Na
+, which would lead to K
+/Na
+ homeostasis
[43]. Higher plants can also exclude Na
+ and Cl
− from the leaves, by preventing xylem loading, recirculate Na
+ in the phloem, or transport these ions into the vacuoles to avoid toxic concentrations in the cytosol.
7.2. Halophytes and Glycophytes
Halophytes can survive much higher concentrations of NaCl, 100–200 mM Na
+ and Cl
−, than glycophytes, and the tissue concentration can be much higher, >500 mM
[46]. Halophytes even grow better under high salt. With some exceptions, glycophytes and halophytes might possess similar tolerance mechanisms, but the reaction strength is higher or starts more rapidly in halophytes
[46][47]. Halophytes usually transport larger amounts of Na
+ and/or K
+ into the vacuole than the glycophytes, to use as a cheap osmoticum. Some halophytes have salt glands which can extrude Na
+ from the leaf cells
[43].
High salt conditions can cause K
+ deficiency both in glycophytes and halophytes
[48]. One reason for this might be the competition between K
+ and Na
+ at the uptake sites
[49][50], as these ions have the same positive charges. The ionic radius is smaller for K
+, 98 pm, than for Na
+, 133 pm, but the hydrated Na
+ has a larger ionic radius than hydrated K
+. The selectivity for the uptake of K
+ over Na
+ is different in different plants, usually Na
+ can inhibit the uptake of K
+, but the opposite is less common, at least if the K
+ concentration is less than 75 mM
[51]. Another reason is that the presence of a high Na
+ concentration causes a depolarization of the plasma membrane leading to K
+ efflux from the cells by GORK and NSCCS channels
[52] (
Figure 1).
Figure 1. Na+ influx into a root cell or mesophyll cell in the leaf causes an efflux of K+ from the cell by GORKs or NSCCs by Na+-induced membrane depolarization. The depolarization might activate the H+ATPase in the plasma membrane, pumping out protons that can be used for the Na+/H+ antiporter (SOS1). Na+ can also leak into the vacuole by SVs or FVs. Under high salinity stress, most Na+ is transported via NSCCs and HKTs into cells, and also by HAKs. GORK, outwards-rectifying K+ channel; HAK, high-affinity K+ channel; NSCC, nonselective cation channel; SV, slow vacuolar channel; FV, fast vacuolar channel.
Depolarization also causes an influx of Ca
2+ [53]. The depolarization is not always negative as it may lead to an activation of the H
+ATPase, and the protons pumped out to apoplast can be used by the SOS1 antiporter. A more recent report suggests that GORK, an outward-rectifying K
+ channel, may operate to switch off energy-consuming anabolic reactions and instead use the energy for stress adaptation
[54]. The K
+ efflux could be a signaling mechanism under salt stress; for instance, an increased H
+ATPase activity and K
+ influx from the vacuole to compensate for the K
+ loss. The SKOR channel, STELAR K
+-outward rectifier, might also be involved in K
+ efflux induced by depolarization.
7.3. Regulation of Na+ Transport at the at Xylem/Parenchyma Cell Border
Not only is a low cytosolic Na
+ in the plant cells important for tolerance, but also in the prevention of ion loading into the xylem at the parenchyma–xylem border for further transport to the shoot. It was shown that both the root and shoot of the halophyte quinoa had a higher K
+ concentration than the root and shoot of the glycophyte pea, and under salinity this concentration was even higher
[55]. Despite a higher concentration of Na
+ in quinoa roots than in pea roots, the K
+/Na
+ ratio was higher in quinoa.
To explain these results, electrophysiological measurements of K
+ and H
+ fluxes from mechanically isolated root xylem of pea and quinoa were performed
[56][57]. The addition of 20 mM NaCl and ABA to the xylem medium, mimicking the natural xylem solution
[58], caused a strong K
+ efflux from the stelar cells of pea but no efflux from quinoa
[55], reflecting K
+ retention in quinoa roots. In pea, K
+ was translocated to the shoot to compensate for a lower uptake of K
+ in the root. There was also a H
+ efflux from the stelar tissue of both species, but the efflux was more pronounced in pea. ABA accumulates in the root under salt stress
[59]. There it might stimulate the SOS protein
[60]. The addition of 50 µM ABA induced a net H
+ uptake into xylem-parenchyma cells of both species and a net K
+ efflux, suggesting an ion exchanger at the xylem–parenchyma interface
[61]. The results corroborate results showing a higher concentration of K
+ in the shoots of quinoa than in pea under salt stress
[55]. Quinoa keeps more K
+ as osmotic regulation in the roots than pea does. The high concentration of Na
+ found in the shoot of quinoa may depend on the fact that quinoa uses Na
+ as osmoregulation in the shoot.
7.4. Different Barley Cultivars Differ in Salt Tolerance
Metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses of barley genotypes showed that the halophyte
Hordeum marinum under salt stress used more Na
+ and K
+ ions for osmotic regulation and root tolerance than the cultivated
Hordeum vulgare, and also increased the glycolysis and TCA cycle to obtain a high energy supply, necessary for shoot tolerance
[62].
7.5. Tolerant Rice Cultivars Have Different Salt-Tolerance Mechanisms
In three rice cultivars showing different salt tolerance, the most sensitive cultivar, cv. VD20, accumulated less Na
+ than the other two cultivars
[63]. The most tolerant cv. AGPPS114 accumulated more Na
+ and also contained higher concentrations of proline and glycine betaine as osmotic regulation than the other two cultivars. Moreover, VD20 showed a higher expression of the HKTs transporters, HKT1;4 and HKT1;5, than the other cultivars, as analyzed by real-time PCR. The authors reported that the tolerant cultivar showed a higher expression of the
SOS1 and
NHX1 than the sensitive cultivars, which might explain the salt tolerance of the former cultivar.
7.6. SOS1 Role in Salt Tolerance
A low concentration of Na
+ in the cytosol is important for salt tolerance. Plants are able to transport Na
+ from the cytosol into apoplasts by the Na
+/H
+ antiporter SOS1. The localization of SOS1 in the plasma membrane was revealed by confocal imaging of a SOS1–green fluorescent protein fusion in transgenic
Arabidopsis [60]. Expression analyses showed that SOS1 was present in the plasma membranes of root tips and in parenchyma cells of the xylem/symport boundary. Thus, the SOS1 protein should have another function too: to reduce the transport of Na
+ from xylem parenchyma cells into the xylem vessels, which would also be of importance for salt tolerance. Conflicting results were recently published from an investigation on the gene expression of
SOS1 and Na
+-flux measurements, which stated that it is only the SOS1 transporters in the outer root tissue that exclude Na
+ from the root cytosol, but that SOS1 operating in the stele actively loads Na
+ to the xylem transpiration stream
[64].
Cytosolic Na
+ concentration and fluxes in living cells can be analyzed by dual-wavelength fluorescence microscopy and the sodium-binding fluorescent dye SBFI, AM
[65]. By the use of this technique, measurements on mesophyll protoplasts from
Arabidopsis shoots showed that the sos1 mutant took up more Na
+ into the cytosol than did the Wt protoplasts when the external solution contained 100 mM NaCl
[66]. Moreover, the
Arabidopsis nhx mutant, localized in tonoplasts and having a functional SOS1, also took up more Na
+ into cytosol than the Wt, probably because both the Na
+/H antiporters are involved in the efflux of Na
+ from cytosol. The main function of NHX is believed to be a regulator of pH and intracellular homeostasis
[67]. In
Arabidopsis, there are four isoforms of NHX and nhx triple and quadruple knockouts showed reduced growth. A lack of any vacuolar-NHX activity resulted in reduced Na
+ uptake and no K
+ uptake, suggesting that these antiporters take up K
+ but also some Na
+. They also reported a Na
+-uptake transporter, which was independent of proton transport.
7.7. Na+ and K+ Transport into the Vacuole
For a long time, it has been stressed that the Na
+/H
+ antiporter NHX in the tonoplast and in some endomembranes is important for salt tolerance, as it might transport Na
+ out from the cytosol. However, the work in
[68] reported that K
+ concentration decreased when the Na
+ concentration was increased in the vacuole. Moreover, coordinated transport by NHX and KEAs, K
+-efflux antiporters, was reported to result in salt tolerance
[69]. Thus, NHX might be more important for K
+ transport into the vacuole and for pH regulation, even if NHX to a lesser degree also mediates the transport of Na
+ [67]. Recent findings suggest that the CCX, a cation/Ca
2+ exchanger, is suggested as a better candidate for salt tolerance than NHX, as it deceases high concentrations of Na
+ in cytosol and reduces reactive oxygen species
[70].
8. Measurements of Cytosolic Ion Changes in Different Species/Cultivars under Salinity
To compare the influx kinetics of Na
+ species, D’Onofrio and coworkers (2005)
[71], Kader and Lindberg (2005)
[72] (
Figure 2), and Sun et al.
[55] used epifluorescence microscopy and the Na
+-binding fluorescent dye SBFI, AM, the acetoxymethyl ester of the benzofuran isophtalate, SBFI. The fluorescent Na
+ indicator CoroNA Green, AM, can also be used to measure Na
+ concentrations in the cytosol. Dyes in AM-ester form can penetrate the plasma membrane and enter into the cytosol, where they are split by esterases into the Na
+-binding fluorescent form. Ratiometric measurements at two excitation wavelengths make the result more reliable than one-wavelength measurement, as different dye concentrations, photobleaching, and the thickness of the cell show little effect
[65][73].
Figure 2. Protoplasts from rice mesophyll in transmitted light (a), and labelled with Fura 2 (b), labelled with SBFI (c), protoplasts from rice root labelled with SBFI (d), from wheat root in transmitted light (e), and labelled with SBFI (f). Fluorescence emission was measured at 530–550 nm.
8.1. Cytosolic Na+ Influx and Efflux from Salt-Tolerant and -Sensitive Species of Quince, Sugar Beet, and Wheat Differ
D’Onofrio et al.
[71] showed that the amplitude and duration of Na
+ influx into protoplasts from species that are highly salt tolerant, such as quince (
Cydonia oblonga Mill), salt tolerant sugar beet (
Beta vulgaris L.cv. Monohill), and less tolerant wheat (
Triticum aestivum L. cv. Kadett) were in the order: wheat > sugar beet > quince. The quince protoplasts took up sodium only from a Ca
2+ free buffer containing 200–400 mM NaCl. The Na
+ influx was transient in quince, but in wheat and sugar beet it increased to a certain level and was then stable. As 1.0 mM external Ca
2+ inhibited the influx, it is likely that Na
+ influx at high salt was mediated by nonselective-cation channels
[29][74]. Only the halophyte quince was able to carry out a rapid efflux of Na
+ from the cytosol.
8.2. Cytosolic Na+ and pH Changes Are Different in the Halophyte Quinoa and the Glycophyte Pea
Different dynamics were obtained in the cytosolic influx of Na
+ in the glycophyte pea,
Pisum sativum, and the halophyte quinoa,
Chenopodium quinoa [55]. The cytosolic Na
+ concentration, [Na
+cyt], was analyzed in mesophyll protoplasts after the cultivation of seedlings with and without 100 mM NaCl, and upon addition of NaCl to the protoplast medium.
The addition of 100 mM NaCl to control protoplasts of quinoa caused a transient [Na
+ cyt] influx and the maximal concentration was obtained after 360 s, at the same time as for salt-adapted quince
[55][71]; but when NaCl was added to salt-cultivated quinoa protoplasts, the maximal Na
+ influx was obtained later (after 450–500 s) and was mainly transient
[55].
The addition of NaCl (50 mM) to pea control protoplasts caused another reaction: the influx increased and was then stable at the same Na+ level. In addition, NaCl addition to pea protoplasts from seedlings pretreated with salinity showed a gradual increase for a long time.
The different reaction obtained in salinity-cultivated quinoa suggests an adaptation mechanism and might depend on a rapid activation of the H
+-ATPase, which was absent in pea, as the Na
+ influx in pea increased with time
[75]. Quinoa grows optimally at 100–200 mM NaCl and is tolerant not only to salt stress but also to drought and frost, and thus is suitable for cultivation in areas where no other plants survive
[76].
8.3. Cytosolic Na+ Influx and Efflux in Tolerant and Sensitive Rice
The same differences in Na
+-influx dynamics were also obtained when comparing the influx in tolerant rice cv. Pokkali with sensitive rice cv. BRRIDhan29
[72].
Pharmacological analysis indicated that NSCCs were the main pathways for Na
+ influx in the tolerant rice cultivar, but that both NSCCs and high-affinity K
+ channels HKTs contributed to influx in the sensitive one. The transient influx of Na
+ suggests that tolerant rice has a mechanism for fast extrusion of Na
+ that protects the cytosol from ion toxicity. This rice cultivar also has less PM permeability to Na
+ compared to salt-sensitive rice
[77]. Inhibitor analysis suggested that tolerant rice transported Na
+ from the cytosol into the vacuole by the Na
+/H
+ antiporter NHX in the tonoplast, but the sensitive cultivar transported Na
+ out of the protoplast by the Na
+/H
+ antiporter SOS1 in the plasma membrane
[78][79][80][81].
Expression analyses by real-time RT-PCR of the
OsVHA genes, which encode the H
+-ATPase in the tonoplast demonstrated that the
OsVHA transcripts were induced immediately after Na
+ stress in the tolerant rice cultivar, but in the sensitive one, the expression of
OsVHA was low and delayed 6 h. The tonoplast H
+-ATPase is supposed to be important for salinity tolerance as it builds up an electrochemical gradient for the transport of cations into the vacuole
[33][82]. These findings confirmed the results from protoplast experiments that showed a fast efflux of sodium from the cytosol of the tolerant rice, but little sodium efflux from the sensitive rice
[32][72].