Internet of Things Foundations: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Contributor:
Hanane Allioui
,
Youssef Mourdi
Internet of Things (IoT) data management plays a crucial role in handling the massive volume, velocity, and variety of data generated by interconnected devices. Robust data management systems ensure data accuracy, reliability, and accessibility, laying the groundwork for informed decision-making and predictive analytics that drive business growth and optimize operations. Interoperability, on the other hand, facilitates seamless communication and collaboration among various IoT devices and platforms, breaking down data silos and enabling a cohesive IoT ecosystem that fosters innovation and efficiency. IoT data analytics emerges as a transformative force, unlocking actionable insights from the vast amounts of data collected. By harnessing advanced analytics tools, businesses can identify patterns, trends, and anomalies, empowering them to make data-driven decisions, enhance customer experiences, and optimize processes. Furthermore, data analytics fuels predictive maintenance, enabling businesses to proactively address issues and minimize downtime, thus fostering financial growth and stability.
  • Internet of Things
  • artificial intelligence
  • business

1. A Comprehensive Review of the Foundational Concepts of Internet of Things

Despite the rapid and exponential growth of the Internet of Things (IoT) in recent years, IoT systems remain subject to the dynamic impact of new customer requirements and ever-evolving market challenges [1]. However, embracing IoT adoption emerges as the decisive step towards comprehensive business management, ushering in a multitude of transformative outcomes. IoT adoption sets the stage for astute business management, empowering organizations to synchronize and optimize diverse factors influencing their operations [2]. By seamlessly integrating IoT devices into their workflows, businesses gain real-time visibility and control over various processes, enabling them to make data-driven decisions, improve efficiency, and streamline operations with unprecedented precision. One of the paramount outcomes of IoT adoption is the proliferation of invaluable databases. As IoT devices continuously collect and generate vast volumes of data, organizations unlock the potential of this information goldmine to gain profound insights [3]. The ability to analyze data patterns, customer behaviors, and market trends empowers businesses to tailor their offerings, devise personalized experiences, and adapt swiftly to changing market demands, thereby solidifying their competitive edge.
The pervasive integration of the Internet into modern business and financial activities is exerting a profound influence across all sectors, presenting unpredictable opportunities and challenges [1]. However, realizing its full potential remains an ambitious endeavor. In business and management, the relentless drive to adopt technological advances necessitates the establishment of indispensable networks capable of seamlessly connecting a diverse array of machines [4]. As a result, industries, inventors, and researchers alike have demonstrated a surging interest in exploring the vast possibilities offered by IoT systems from multifaceted perspectives. Nevertheless, amidst this discourse, a key consideration revolves around the need for standardized IoT architectures that can effectively execute complex tasks requiring critical insights. While various specialists have proposed distinct architectures, a unified and widely accepted framework has yet to be established [5][6].
A thriving IoT ecosystem, as depicted in Figure 1, demands intelligent and web-assisted tools that harness integrated structures, such as advanced sensors, to carefully collect, transmit, process, and store data [7]. The beauty of IoT lies in its ability to enable devices to interact autonomously with other machines, individuals, or interconnected devices, autonomously gathering information without human intervention [8]. This inherent capability drives unprecedented levels of automation and efficiency, revolutionizing industries and enhancing the quality of life for individuals worldwide.
Sensors 23 08015 g002
Figure 1. Data processing pipeline in IoT ecosystem.
In essence, the incorporation and adoption of the Internet and IoT presents an intricate web of opportunities and challenges, necessitating cohesive efforts to harness its potential to the fullest [2][9]. As industries forge ahead, embracing the transformative power of IoT, the quest for standardized and robust architectures becomes a paramount objective to unlock the true value of this burgeoning technology. By establishing harmonized frameworks, businesses can drive seamless communication, collaboration, and innovation across the IoT landscape, paving the way for a future where smart devices and interconnected ecosystems empower humanity to achieve new heights of productivity, sustainability, and connectivity [9]. The journey forward entails exploring uncharted territories, navigating complexities, and embracing a spirit of relentless innovation to propel the world into a new era of boundless possibilities facilitated by the dynamic convergence of the Internet and IoT technologies.
IoT applications heavily depend on effective communication, seamless connectivity, and robust networking protocols. These aspects play a crucial role in facilitating IoT adoption in various contexts of application. Additionally, to process data in a more advanced manner, several artificial intelligence technologies have been proposed to enhance the existing IoT architectures [10][11].
The IoT is characterized by a set of key features that define its transformative nature and technological prowess [9][12]. At its core, IoT is an interconnected network of devices, sensors, and objects that seamlessly communicate and exchange data through the Internet. These key characteristics encompass:
  • Connectivity: IoT thrives on connectivity, enabling devices to communicate with each other and with central systems. This interconnectedness forms the foundation for real-time data exchange and intelligent decision-making [4][13].
  • Sensing and Perception: IoT devices are equipped with sensors that capture and perceive the surrounding environment. These sensors can detect various parameters, such as temperature, humidity, motion, and more, allowing IoT systems to gather valuable data [4][14].
  • Data Analysis and Intelligence: The influx of data generated by IoT devices calls for advanced data analytics and artificial intelligence techniques. IoT leverages this intelligence to gain insights, detect patterns, and optimize processes, ultimately facilitating informed decision-making [15][16].
  • Automation and Control: IoT empowers automation by enabling devices to execute predefined tasks without human intervention. This automation fosters increased efficiency, reduced human errors, and enhanced productivity [14][16].
  • Scalability and Flexibility: The versatility of IoT allows seamless expansion and integration of new devices and technologies. The scalability of IoT systems ensures that they can adapt and accommodate diverse use cases [17].
  • Interoperability: For IoT to thrive, interoperability between different devices and platforms is crucial. IoT standards and protocols facilitate smooth communication and collaboration among heterogeneous IoT systems [18][19][20].
  • Security and Privacy: With the extensive data exchange, ensuring robust security and privacy measures is paramount. IoT systems must implement encryption, authentication, and other security mechanisms to safeguard sensitive data and protect users’ privacy [20][21].
  • Real-Time Responsiveness: The real-time nature of IoT enables immediate actions and responses. IoT systems can react promptly to changing conditions, making them ideal for applications requiring quick decision-making and response times [5].
  • Energy Efficiency: IoT devices are designed with energy efficiency in mind, ensuring prolonged battery life and reduced energy consumption. This characteristic is particularly vital for IoT applications that rely on battery-powered devices [22].
  • Ubiquitous Access: IoT extends beyond traditional computing devices and offers ubiquitous access to data and services. Users can interact with IoT systems through smartphones, wearables, and other connected devices from anywhere at any time [5].
These key characteristics of IoT collectively define its transformative potential and far-reaching impact across various industries, promising a future where an interconnected world enriches our lives and drives innovation [1][2][9][21][23][24]. The strong connection between the key characteristics and key devices underscores the synergistic nature of the Internet of Things. The successful interplay of these components enables IoT to realize its transformative potential, driving innovation and revolutionizing industries across the globe. As IoT technology continues to evolve, the seamless integration of key characteristics and key devices will shape the future of interconnected systems and drive humanity toward a more connected and intelligent world [15].
The key devices in the IoT ecosystem encompass a diverse range of smart and interconnected devices that play essential roles in collecting and transmitting data. These devices form the foundation of IoT applications and enable the seamless integration of the physical and digital worlds. Some of the key devices in IoT include:
  • Sensors: Sensors are crucial components in IoT devices as they enable the collection of real-time data from the physical environment [25][26]. Various types of sensors, such as temperature sensors, humidity sensors, motion sensors, light sensors, and proximity sensors, provide valuable insights into the surrounding conditions [27][28].
  • Actuators: Actuators are devices that can initiate physical actions based on the data collected by sensors or the instructions received from IoT systems. They can perform actions like opening or closing valves, turning on or off appliances, and controlling machinery [29][30].
  • Wearable Devices: Wearables, such as smartwatches, fitness trackers, and smart glasses, are IoT devices that are worn on the body [31]. They continuously monitor health and fitness data and often interact with smartphones or other connected devices [32].
  • Smart Home Devices: Smart home devices include smart thermostats, smart lights, smart locks, and smart appliances that can be controlled remotely or automated to optimize energy usage and enhance home security and comfort [33].
  • Connected Vehicles: IoT has revolutionized the automotive industry with connected vehicles that gather data and provide real-time insights on vehicle performance, maintenance needs, and driver behavior [8].
  • Industrial IoT (IIoT) Devices: In industrial settings, IoT devices play a crucial role in monitoring and optimizing manufacturing processes, predictive maintenance, and ensuring worker safety [25].
  • Smart Health Devices: IoT-enabled health devices, such as remote patient-monitoring systems, smart medical wearables, and health-tracking applications, are revolutionizing healthcare by providing continuous health monitoring and timely interventions [20][34].
  • Smart City Infrastructure: IoT is integral to building smart cities, with devices like smart traffic lights, smart waste management systems, and smart energy grids enhancing urban sustainability and efficiency [33][35].
  • Agricultural IoT Devices: IoT is transforming agriculture with devices like smart irrigation systems, soil sensors, and livestock monitoring systems, enabling precision farming and maximizing crop yields [36].
  • Connected Consumer Electronics: Many everyday consumer electronics, such as smart TVs, smart speakers, and smart home assistants, are IoT devices that provide a seamless user experience and connectivity [26].
These key IoT devices work in unison to create a connected ecosystem, generating and exchanging data that fuel intelligent decision-making, automation, and improved user experiences. With the continuous evolution and innovation in IoT technology, the range and capabilities of these devices are expected to expand, further driving the transformative potential of the Internet of Things.
The design of IoT architectures revolves around a thorough examination of the technical intricacies, specific business objectives, and unique service demands of each scenario [1][2][9][12][13][21][23][24][33][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. By carefully considering these factors, the designers can tailor the number and functionalities of layers to create a coherent and efficient system [42].
Due to the rapidly evolving nature of IoT, a single, standardized reference architecture has not yet emerged [42][43][44]. As the technology continues to advance and diversify, multiple approaches and frameworks have been proposed to address varying use cases and industries. This diverse landscape of IoT architectures showcases the adaptability and flexibility of the technology in accommodating different requirements. However, despite the absence of a unified standard reference architecture, there is a palpable trend in the IoT community toward achieving greater convergence in designing these systems. Industry leaders and standardization bodies are working collaboratively to establish common principles, protocols, and best practices that can serve as a foundation for more cohesive and interoperable IoT solutions [45].
The guide towards a more unified approach in reference architectures represents a significant step forward for the IoT ecosystem [42][43][44][45]. By fostering interoperability and reducing complexities, a unified architecture can simplify the development and deployment processes, stimulate innovation, and foster greater adoption across various industries. This convergence also helps bridge the gaps between different IoT implementations, promoting seamless integration and enabling the creation of comprehensive IoT ecosystems.
As IoT continues to revolutionize industries and redefine the way humans interact with technology, the development of unified reference architectures becomes increasingly crucial [44]. A harmonized approach not only fosters greater collaboration among stakeholders but also instills confidence in businesses and consumers alike, promoting widespread adoption and unleashing the full potential of IoT to transform our daily lives and drive financial growth [1].
The IoT architectures provide guidelines and frameworks for designing and implementing IoT solutions [32][42][43][44][45]. The most well-known IoT architectures are:
  • IoT-A (Internet of Things—Architecture): IoT-A is a research project that aims to define a reference architecture for IoT systems. It provides a scalable and flexible framework, focusing on interoperability. The architecture is divided into three main views: the Application View, the Information View, and the Communication View. IoT-A emphasizes modularity and reusability of components, making it easier to design and deploy IoT solutions across various domains.
  • AWS IoT Architecture: Amazon Web Services (AWS) offers a comprehensive IoT architecture that leverages its cloud services. AWS IoT provides a scalable and secure platform for connecting devices, managing data, and building applications. It includes components like AWS IoT Core for device management and connectivity, AWS IoT Greengrass for edge computing capabilities, and AWS IoT Analytics for data processing and insights.
  • Microsoft Azure IoT Reference Architecture: Microsoft Azure provides a robust IoT reference architecture to help developers design scalable and secure IoT solutions. It incorporates various Azure services, such as Azure IoT Hub for device connectivity, Azure IoT Edge for edge computing, and Azure IoT Central for simplified device management.
  • IBM IoT Reference Architecture: IBM offers an IoT reference architecture that covers the entire IoT ecosystem, from edge devices to cloud-based applications. It emphasizes integration with the IBM Watson IoT Platform for device management, data processing, and AI-powered insights.
  • IoTivity: IoTivity is an open-source IoT framework developed by the Open Connectivity Foundation (OCF). It aims to provide a standardized and interoperable approach to IoT device connectivity and communication. IoTivity supports various IoT protocols, enabling seamless interoperability between different devices and ecosystems.
  • Google Cloud IoT Architecture: Google Cloud Platform (GCP) offers an IoT architecture that leverages Google Cloud IoT Core, Google Cloud Pub/Sub, and other GCP services. It provides a robust platform for device management, data ingestion, and analytics in IoT applications.
  • Hyperledger Caliper: Hyperledger Caliper is an open-source project under the Linux Foundation’s Hyperledger umbrella. While not a full IoT architecture, it allows benchmarking different blockchain frameworks for IoT use cases, focusing on performance evaluation.
  • ARM mbed: ARM’s mbed platform aims to provide a scalable and secure foundation for IoT devices and applications. It offers a suite of tools, operating systems, and device management capabilities that make it easier for developers to create IoT solutions.
  • OpenFog Consortium Architecture: The OpenFog Consortium focuses on edge computing in IoT. It has developed an architecture that addresses the challenges of deploying IoT and AI solutions at the edge of the network, emphasizing low-latency processing, data security, and scalability.
The ecosystem of IoT is constantly evolving, with new technologies, use cases, and industry requirements emerging at a rapid pace [42][45]. This dynamic nature of IoT demands that architectures continually evolve and adapt to address the challenges and opportunities presented by the ever-changing IoT ecosystem. The continuous evolution of IoT necessitates architectures that are responsive to technological advancements, changing use cases, scalability requirements, security concerns, standardization efforts, and business developments. Flexibility, adaptability, and interoperability are essential characteristics for IoT architectures to stay relevant, support innovation, and drive the widespread adoption of IoT technologies across various industries.

2. The Historical Development and Evolution of IoT Technologies

IoT adoption has established a new era of optimized system life cycles. Through IoT-driven monitoring, predictive maintenance, and intelligent diagnostics, businesses attain an unprecedented level of control over their assets [15]. As a result, system downtimes are minimized, operational efficiency is maximized, and the overall lifespan of critical components is extended, leading to tangible cost savings and enhanced sustainability.
Beyond the benefits to individual enterprises, IoT adoption catalyzes a transformative shift in entire ecosystems [5]. Collaborative partnerships and data-sharing among interconnected IoT networks drive innovation and foster novel business models. The creation of interconnected value chains allows businesses to leverage collective insights, generate new revenue streams, and fuel disruptive growth opportunities [25].
While IoT’s meteoric rise has been remarkable, its potential to revolutionize business operations remains boundless [2]. Organizations that embrace IoT adoption position themselves to thrive amidst the ever-changing landscape of customer preferences and market challenges [15]. The convergence of IoT’s capabilities for business management, data-driven decision-making, and system optimization promises to shape the future of industries on a global scale. By embracing this transformative technology, enterprises can navigate the dynamic challenges of the digital era and forge a path toward sustained success and enduring relevance. The journey forward is illuminated by the limitless possibilities of IoT, propelling organizations into a new era of efficiency, innovation, and unparalleled connectivity [1].
The historical development and evolution of IoT technologies can be traced back to several key milestones and technological advancements over the years [46]. The concept of connecting devices and machines to the Internet and enabling them to communicate and exchange data has been evolving for decades [47]. Here is a brief overview of the historical development of IoT technologies:
  • Early Concepts (1980s–1990s): The foundational ideas of IoT can be traced back to the 1980s and 1990s when researchers and technologists began envisioning a world where devices could be interconnected and communicate with each other. At this stage, the focus was mainly on machine-to-machine (M2M) communication and remote monitoring of industrial systems [23][26][46].
  • Emergence of RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) (1990s–2000s): The development of RFID technology marked a significant step in the evolution of IoT. RFID tags enabled the identification and tracking of objects and assets using radio waves, laying the groundwork for the idea of a connected world where objects and devices could be uniquely identified and accessed [25][42][43][44][45][46].
  • Proliferation of Internet Connectivity (2000s): The widespread adoption of the Internet in the early 2000s paved the way for the expansion of IoT technologies. The increasing availability of internet connectivity allowed devices and sensors to connect and transmit data over the web, creating the basis for IoT applications [21][26].
  • Advancements in Sensor Technology (2000s): The improvement and miniaturization of sensors during this period enabled the integration of various types of sensors into devices, making them capable of capturing data from their environment. These sensors became essential components of IoT devices, enabling them to collect real-time data [30][46].
  • Smart Home and Wearable Devices (2010s): The 2010s saw the rise of consumer-oriented IoT devices, such as smart home appliances and wearable devices. Smart thermostats, smart speakers, fitness trackers, and smartwatches gained popularity, showcasing the potential of IoT in enhancing daily life and user experiences [33][35].
  • Industrial IoT (IIoT) and Industry 4.0 (2010s): The convergence of IoT with industrial applications, known as the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) or Industry 4.0, became prominent. IIoT revolutionized manufacturing and industrial processes by enabling real-time monitoring, predictive maintenance, and data-driven decision-making [25].
  • Cloud Computing and Big Data (2010s): The advent of cloud computing and big data analytics provided the necessary infrastructure and tools to process and analyze the vast amounts of data generated by IoT devices. Cloud platforms allow for scalable and flexible data storage and processing, enhancing the capabilities of IoT applications [5][11][18][44].
  • Edge Computing (2010s): As IoT applications grew, the limitations of relying solely on cloud computing for data processing became apparent. Edge computing emerged as a solution, enabling data processing and analysis to occur closer to the data source, reducing latency, and improving real-time responsiveness [11][44].
  • Connectivity Advancements and 5G (2010s–2020s): The deployment of 5G networks and other connectivity advancements further accelerated the growth of IoT technologies. The high-speed, low-latency, and massive connectivity capabilities of 5G opened up new possibilities for IoT applications in various domains [48].
  • AI and Machine Learning Integration (2020s): The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) with IoT technologies has unlocked powerful insights and automation capabilities. AI-driven analytics enable more sophisticated data processing and predictive decision-making in IoT applications [10][14][40].
The historical development of IoT technologies is a testament to the continuous evolution and innovation in the field [5]. As IoT continues to advance, it holds immense promise to revolutionize industries, improve efficiency, and enhance the quality of life for people around the world.

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/s23198015

References

  1. Ediagbonya, V.; Tioluwani, C. The role of fintech in driving financial inclusion in developing and emerging markets: Issues, challenges, and prospects. Technol. Sustain. 2023, 2, 100–119.
  2. Jarašūnienė, A.; Čižiūnienė, K.; Čereška, A. Research on Impact of IoT on Warehouse Management. Sensors 2023, 23, 2213.
  3. Nagaty, K.A. IoT Commercial and Industrial Applications and AI-Powered IoT. InFrontiers of Quality Electronic Design (QED); Iranmanesh, A., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023.
  4. Orfanos, V.A.; Kaminaris, S.D.; Papageorgas, P.; Piromalis, D.; Kandris, D. A Comprehensive Review of IoT Networking Technologies for Smart Home Automation Applications. J. Sens. Actuator Netw. 2023, 12, 30.
  5. Pal, A.; Rath, H.K.; Shailendra, S.; Bhattacharyya, A. IoT standardization: The road ahead. In Internet of Things-Technology, Applications, and Standardization; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018; pp. 53–74.
  6. Bader, S.R.; Maleshkova, M.; Lohmann, S. Structuring reference architectures for the industrial Internet of things. Future Internet 2019, 11, 151.
  7. Gaber, M.M.; Aneiba, A.; Basurra, S.; Batty, O.; Elmisery, A.M.; Kovalchuk, Y.; Rhanam, M.H.U. Internet of things and data mining: From applications to techniques and systems. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 2019, 9, e1292.
  8. Wei, Z.; Jia, Y.; Yao, Y.; Zhu, L.; Guan, L.; Mao, Y.; Liu, P.; Zhang, Y. Discovering and understanding the security hazards in the interactions between IoT devices, mobile apps, and clouds on smart home platforms. In Proceedings of the 28th Security Symposium, Santa Clara, CA, USA, 14–16 August 2019; pp. 1133–1150.
  9. Bi, Z.; Jin, Y.; Maropoulos, P.; Zhang, W.-J.; Wang, L. Internet of things (IoT) and big data analytics (BDA) for digital manufacturing (DM). Int. J. Prod. Res. 2023, 61, 4004–4021.
  10. Piccialli, F.; Cuomo, S.; Di Cola, V.S.; Casolla, G. A machine learning approach for IoT cultural data. J. Ambient. Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 2019, 1–12.
  11. Fatima, H.; Hussain, R.; Hassan, S.A.; Hossain, E. Machine learning in IoT security: Current solutions and future challenges. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2020, 22, 1686–1721.
  12. San Emeterio de la Parte, M.; Martínez-Ortega, J.F.; Hernández Díaz, V.; Martinez, N.L. Big Data and precision agriculture: A Novel spatio-temporal Semantic IoT Data Management Framework for Improved Interoperability. J Big Data 2023, 10, 52.
  13. Ren, Y.; Huang, D.; Wang, W.; Yu, X. BSMD: A blockchain-based secure storage mechanism for big spatio-temporal data. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2023, 138, 328–338.
  14. Zeng, Q.; Lv, Z.; Li, C.; Shi, Y.; Lin, Z.; Liu, C.; Song, G. FedProLs: Federated learning for IoT perception data prediction. Appl. Intell. 2023, 53, 3563–3575.
  15. Allioui, H.; Allioui, A. The Financial Sphere in the Era of COVID-19: Trends and Perspectives of Artificial Intelligence. In Finance, Law, and the Crisis of COVID-19; Contributions to Management Science, Mansour, N., Vadell, M.B., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022.
  16. Allioui, H.; Allioui, A.; Mourdi, Y. AI-Based Logistics Solutions to Tackle COVID-19 Pandemic and Ensure a Sustainable Financial Growth. In Advanced AI and Internet of Health Things for Combating Pandemics; Lahby, M., Pilloni, V., Banerjee, J.S., Mahmud, M., Eds.; Internet of Things; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023.
  17. Yavari, A.; Korala, H.; Georgakopoulos, D.; Kua, J.; Bagha, H. Sazgar IoT: A Device-Centric IoT Framework and Approximation Technique for Efficient and Scalable IoT Data Processing. Sensors 2023, 23, 5211.
  18. Pliatsios, A.; Kotis, K.; Goumopoulos, C. A systematic review on semantic interoperability in the IoE-enabled smart cities. Internet Things 2023, 22, 100754.
  19. Lemus-Zúñiga, L.-G.; Félix, J.M.; Fides-Valero, A.; Benlloch-Dualde, J.-V.; Martinez-Millana, A. A Proof-of-Concept IoT System for Remote Healthcare Based on Interoperability Standards. Sensors 2022, 22, 1646.
  20. Abounassar, E.M.; El-Kafrawy, P.; Abd El-Latif, A.A. Security and Interoperability Issues with Internet of Things (IoT) in Healthcare Industry: A Survey. In Security and Privacy Preserving for IoT and 5G Networks; Abd El-Latif, A.A., Abd-El-Atty, B., Venegas-Andraca, S.E., Mazurczyk, W., Gupta, B.B., Eds.; Studies in Big Data; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; Volume 95.
  21. Zubaydi, H.D.; Varga, P.; Molnár, S. Leveraging Blockchain Technology for Ensuring Security and Privacy Aspects in Internet of Things: A Systematic Literature Review. Sensors 2023, 23, 788.
  22. Bharany, S.; Sharma, S.; Khalaf, O.I.; Abdulsahib, G.M.; Al Humaimeedy, A.S.; Aldhyani, T.H.H.; Maashi, M.; Alkahtani, H. A Systematic Survey on Energy-Efficient Techniques in Sustainable Cloud Computing. Sustainability 2022, 14, 6256.
  23. Kumar, M.; Mukherjee, P.; Verma, S.; Kavita; Shafi, S.; Wozniak, M. A smart privacy-preserving framework for industrial IoT using hybrid meta-heuristic algorithm. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 5372.
  24. Najafi, S.E.; Nozari, H.; Edalatpanah, S.A. Investigating the Key Parameters Affecting Sustainable IoT-Based Marketing. In Computational Intelligence Methodologies Applied to Sustainable Development Goals; Verdegay, J.L., Brito, J., Cruz, C., Eds.; Studies in Computational Intelligence; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; Volume 1036.
  25. Cleber, M.; Sadok, D.; Kelner, J. An IoT sensor and scenario survey for data researchers. J. Br. Comput. Soc. 2019, 25, 4.
  26. Albrecht, S.; Van Laerhoven, K. How to build smart appliances? IEEE Pers. Commun. 2001, 8, 66–71.
  27. Khelif, F.; Bradai, A.; Benslimane, A.; Rawat, P.; Atri, M. A survey of localization systems in Internet of things. Mob. Netw. Appl. 2019, 24, 761–785.
  28. Andrews, L.J.B.; Raja, L. Mobile android-based remote patient monitoring system through wearable sensors. J. Discret. Math. Sci. Cryptogr. 2019, 22, 557–568.
  29. Vijaya, R.S.; Nalluri, S.; Ramasubbareddy, S.; Govinda, K.; Swetha, E. Brilliant corp yield prediction utilizing Internet of Things. In Data Engineering and Communication Technology; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 893–902.
  30. Salah, M. IoT physical layer: Sensors, actuators, controllers, and programming. In The Era of Internet of Things; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 21–47.
  31. Tournier, J.; Lesueur, F.; Mouel, F.; Guyon, L.; Hassine, H.B. A survey of IoT protocols and their security issues through the lens of a generic IoT stack. Internet Things 2021, 16, 100264.
  32. Lee, J.S.; Dong, M.F.; Sun, Y.H. A preliminary study of low power wireless technologies: ZigBee and Bluetooth low energy. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 10th Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), Auckland, New Zealand, 15–17 June 2015; pp. 135–139.
  33. Kasmi, M.; Bahloul, F.; Tkitek, H. Smart home based on Internet of Things and cloud computing. In Proceedings of the 2016 7th International Conference on Sciences of Electronics, Technologies of Information and Telecommunications (SETIT), Hammamet, Tunisia, 18–20 December 2016; pp. 82–86.
  34. Haouel, J.; Ghorbel, H.; Bargaoui, H. Towards an IoT architecture for persons with disabilities and applications. In Proceedings of the International Conference on IoT Technologies for HealthCare, Västerås, Sweden, 18–19 October 2016; pp. 159–161.
  35. Gea, T.; Paradells, J.; Lamarca, M.; Roldán, D. Smart cities as an application of Internet of Things: Experiences and lessons learned in Barcelona. In Proceedings of the 2013 Seventh International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing, Taichung, Taiwan, 3–5 July 2013; pp. 552–557.
  36. Cambra, C.; Sendra, S.; Lloret, J.; Garcia, L. An IoT service-oriented system for agriculture monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Paris, France, 21–25 May 2017; pp. 1–6.
  37. Gaikwad, P.P.; Gabhane, J.P.; Golait, S.S. A survey based on smart homes system using internet-of-things. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Computation of Power, Energy, Information and Communication (ICCPEIC), Melmaruvathur, India, 22–23 April 2015; pp. 0330–0335.
  38. Zixuan, Y.; Zhifang, W.; Chang, L. Research on marine environmental monitoring system based on the Internet of Things technology. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Electronic Information and Communication Technology (ICEICT), Harbin, China, 20–22 August 2016; pp. 121–125.
  39. Evans, D. Cisco. L’internet des Objets. 2011. Available online: http://www.cisco.com/web/CA/solutions/executive/assets/pdf/internetof-things-fr.pdf (accessed on 13 January 2023).
  40. Sahni, Y.; Cao, J.; Zhang, S.; Yang, L. Edge mesh: A new paradigm to enable distributed intelligence in Internet of things. IEEE Access 2017, 5, 16441–16458.
  41. Safa, M.; Pandian, A.; Gururaj, H.L.; Ravi, V.; Krichen, M. Real-time health care big data analytics model for improved QoS in cardiac disease prediction with IoT devices. Health Technol. 2023, 13, 473–483.
  42. Jabraeil Jamali, M.A.; Bahrami, B.; Heidari, A.; Allahverdizadeh, P.; Norouzi, F. IoT Architecture. In Towards the Internet of Things. EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020.
  43. Gupta, B.B.; Quamara, M. An overview of Internet of Things (IoT): Architectural aspects, challenges, and protocols. Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp. 2020, 32, e4946.
  44. Alfonso, I.; Garcés, K.; Castro, H.; Cabot, J. A model-based infrastructure for the specification and runtime execution of self-adaptive IoT architectures. Computing 2023, 105, 1883–1906.
  45. Moreta, N.; Aragon, D.; Oña, S.; Jaramillo, A.; Ibarra, J.; Jahankhani, H. Comparison of Cybersecurity Methodologies for the Implementing of a Secure IoT Architecture. In Cybersecurity in the Age of Smart Societies; Jahankhani, H., Ed.; Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023.
  46. Gubbi, J.; Buyya, R.; Marusic, S.; Palaniswami, M. Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2013, 29, 1645–1660.
  47. Elijah, O.; Rahman, T.A.; Orikumhi, I.; Leow, C.Y.; Hindia, M.N. An overview of Internet of Things (IoT) and data analytics in agriculture: Benefits and challenges. IEEE Internet Things J. 2018, 5, 3758–3773.
  48. Pons, M.; Valenzuela, E.; Rodríguez, B.; Nolazco-Flores, J.A.; Del-Valle-Soto, C. Utilization of 5G Technologies in IoT Applications: Current Limitations by Interference and Network Optimization Difficulties—A Review. Sensors 2023, 23, 3876.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
Video Production Service
Feedback