4. Adaptation vs. Maladaptation
4.1. Ability of Sea Level Populations to Adapt to High Altitude
Most literature data are obtained in the days or weeks immediately following the onset of hypoxia, where the signs of maladaptation are addressed in terms of AMS insurgence. Relatively little data are available to document the effects of longer (months, years) exposures, which may give clues for the ability of low-altitude dwellers to adapt to hypoxia.
The sojourners in the Antarctica plateau are fit and healthy individuals who are specifically trained to sojourn for up to 10 months at an equivalent altitude of 3800 m/13.2 %O
2 in an environment that excludes the presence of disturbing variables related to cold and changes in altitude, with the only probable exception the rupture of circadian rhythms
[12]. In these subjects, the expected changes in the acid–base status are maintained for 10 months without any appreciable modification
[12]. Remarkably, even the metabolome changes remain unaffected for that period of time, with the exception of a slow return toward baseline of the non-polar metabolome after 6 months of hypoxia
[13]. Likewise, the variables linked to the redox imbalance, including ROS, oxidative stress biomarkers, NO, and proinflammatory cytokines, peak by the 20th day of hypoxia but do not return to baseline levels
[14]. Such data highlight a missed capacity of adaptation to hypoxia in Caucasians born at sea level, at least for one year. Longer permanence of sea-level dwellers at altitude, such as immigrant Han Chinese in Tibet, gives rise to up to 18% incidence of CMS
[15]. Thus, to the best of our knowledge, available data indicate that sea-level-dwellers exposed to hypoxia for years have missed the ability to adapt to this challenge.
4.2. Generations-Long Adaptation to Hypoxia
About 80 million people live permanently at >2500 m altitude in the Andes, South-East Asia, and Ethiopia
[1]. These populations have developed diverging responses to altitude hypoxia. Andeans go the hematological route
[16] with elevated Hb that enables carrying more O
2 in blood, but high CMS incidence, which occurs in 16% of the adult male population, with increasing prevalence with age, rising up to 30% by the fifth decade of age
[17], highlighting poor adaptation to hypoxia. Tibetans go the respiratory route
[16]: They inhale more air with each breath and breathe more rapidly with high plasma NO
2− + NO
3−, a biomarker of the NO-storing capacity. This results in sporadic CMS in altitude-native Tibetans
[15][18]. Ethiopians Amhara highlanders display lower CMS rates
[19], reduced erythropoiesis, higher plasma NO
2− + NO
3− and cGMP, and lower diastolic blood pressure. These features translate into a marked vasodilatory response to hypoxia with respect to related lowlanders at altitude, who instead display an elevated erythropoietic response
[20]. Although not properly an altitude population, the Kyrghyz commuters are of interest because 14–20% of them show signs of altitude PH and are characterized by a higher-than-normal fraction of hyper-responders to acute hypoxia
[21]. A case–control study identified in healthy Kyrghyz highlanders the presence of genetic traits that discriminate hyper-responders to hypoxia who develop PH
[22]. It was pointed out
[22] that Kyrghyz commuters have unique patterns with respect to other altitude populations because they do not present other features linked to chronic hypoxia besides PH, unlike the Andean population, where polycythemia may have confounding characteristics, or Tibetans, where PH is practically absent.
It is therefore tempting to state that high-altitude populations born and residing in the Himalayas (Tibetans, Sherpas, and to a lesser extent Ladakhis) are “adapted” to altitude because they suffer altitude-related diseases to a lesser extent and display reduced erythropoietic response. By contrast, Andean populations (Aymaras and Quechuas) reveal an exaggerated erythropoietic response with hematocrit values exceeding 50% and an increased risk of dysfunction due to high blood viscosity
[23][24][25]. A hypothesis explaining the Tibetan–Andean differences is the longer altitude residence for Tibetans (about 30,000 years), with enough time to adapt genetically than for Andeans (about 10,000 years)
[26]. These figures are, however, complicated by the relatively recent massive migration into the Andes in the XVIIth century, as opposed to the relatively conserved population distribution in the Himalayas.
4.3. Ability of High-Altitude Populations to Adapt to Sea Level
Although uncommon, in some instances altitude-adapted subjects are forced, mostly for political reasons, to flee their native habitats in search of more suitable environments, often at lower altitudes. Several thousand Tibetan refugees born at altitude but residing at sea level provide the unique opportunity to test the reversibility of the processes that may have driven altitude adaptation. In this instance, the hypoxic stimulus is broken, and the subjects are exposed to a condition of relative hyperoxia.
Figure 3 (Samaja et al., unpublished observations) shows the blood Hb concentration in individuals born in Tibet who have fled to <500 m/>20.1 %O
2, and in Indian-ancestry residents in the same area as a control. Clearly, missing the hypoxic stimulus remarkably depresses erythropoiesis, at least in males, who face the risk of becoming anemic. Another large-scale study revealed a lower RBC count, hematocrit, and Hb levels in Tibetans living long-term at low altitudes compared to their high-altitude counterparts
[27]. In a further study, it was found that the Hb concentration was lower in Tibetans living at sea level than in Han Chinese individuals, along with a higher minute ventilation and blunted pulmonary vascular responses to acute (minutes) and sustained (8 h) hypoxia
[28]. The same study also shows a lower hypoxic induction of HIF-regulated genes in peripheral blood lymphocytes as well as a significant correlation between EPAS1 and EGLN1 genotypes and induction of EPO by hypoxia in Tibetans compared with Han Chinese, highlighting the less-vigorous response to hypoxic challenge
[28]. This evidence converges in indicating the occurrence of outcomes compatible with a response to a relatively hyperoxic environment in subjects adapted to live at altitude. It remains to be established if such a hematological response to relative hyperoxia is harmful.
Figure 3. Hemoglobin concentration in the blood of Tibetan and Indian males (n = 37 and 56, respectively) residing at <500 m/>20.1 %O2. Tibetans display a lower Hb level (p < 0.0001, Student’s t-test). The green lines represent the 95% confidence limits.