You're using an outdated browser. Please upgrade to a modern browser for the best experience.
Corneal Transplantation in the Past Decade: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 3 by Catherine Yang and Version 2 by Catherine Yang.

The cornea is a transparent avascular structure located in the front of the eye that refracts light entering the eyes and also serves as a barrier between the outside world and the internal contents of the eye. Like every other body part, the cornea may suffer insult from trauma, infection, and inflammation. In the case of trauma, a prior infection that left a scar, or conditions such as keratoconus that warrant the removal of all or part of the cornea (keratoplasty), it is important to use healthy donor corneal tissues and cells that can replace the damaged cornea. The types of cornea transplant techniques employed currently include penetrating keratoplasty, endothelial keratoplasty (EK), and artificial cornea transplant. Postoperative failure acutely or after years can result after a cornea transplant and may require a repeat transplant. This minireviewsearch briefly examines the various types of corneal transplant methodologies, indications, contraindications, presurgical protocols, sources of cornea transplant material, wound healing after surgery complications, co-morbidities, and the effect of COVID-19 in corneal transplant surgery.

  • cornea transplant (CT)
  • penetrating keratoplasty
  • endothelial keratoplasty (EK)

1. Introduction

The cornea is an avascular tissue that is transparent due to the arrangement of its component cells, its avascularity and the metabolic processes its endothelium carries out [1]. It measures 11–12 mm horizontally and 10–11 mm vertically. The cornea is 500–600 μm thick in the center while it gets thicker towards the periphery. The cornea is aspheric and has a refractive index of 1.376. Research has found the average cornea radius to be 7.8 mm, which results in a dioptric power of 43.25 D on the front surface of the cornea, using the keratometer calibration index of 1.3375 [2]. The total dioptric power of a normal human eye is about 58.60 D, and the cornea contributes 74%. This shows the importance of the cornea in vision as it contributes the most to bending light rays. In simpler terms, its curvature influences to a large extent the possibility of refractive error being present. The cornea is the major cause of astigmatism in the human refractive system. A healthy cornea is a trilaminar tissue with the following layers: the epithelium, Bowman’s layer (epithelial basement membrane), substantia propria (or stroma), Descemet’s membrane (basement membrane of stroma), and endothelium [3].

2. Corneal Transplant—Methodology, Indications, and Contraindications

Corneal transplantation (CT) is indicated via any processes leading to loss of corneal transparency, with neuroretinal integrity and optimal visual potential otherwise preserved [4]. CT is usually required for the management of advanced corneal dystrophies, corneal degenerations, and occluding corneal scars secondary to mechanical, chemical, or thermal injuries, all without comorbid ocular disease conditions to consider (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Flow Chart depicting a summary of Cornea Transplant. * 1276 records were excluded for being out of range chronologically; ** Records that did not contain the word transplant in their title were removed; *** Records were based on limbal and other body parts transplants.
CTs are among the most common procedure performed in many tertiary eye centers worldwide [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Various forms of CT are carried out, depending on the laminar depth of scarring or recipient corneal tissue viability. Lamellar keratoplasty is indicated when scarring extends to the corneal epithelium, Bowman’s layer, and stroma. This can either be anterior lamellar keratoplasty (ALK) for more superficial graft implantation; or deep lamellar keratoplasty (DLK) [13] when the stroma is equally diseased. The technique of penetrating keratoplasty (PK) replaces the entire thickness of corneal tissue [14]. The advent of endothelial keratoplasty (EK) has evolved the surgical approach to corneal endothelial dystrophies (i.e., Fuch’s endothelial dystrophy (FED), congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy), and other corneal insults causing endothelial pump failure. EK is performed via various techniques, including Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK), Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), Descemet’s membrane automated endothelial keratoplasty (DMAEK), and posterior lamellar keratoplasty (PLK) [15][16]. Usually, for lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty, donor corneal tissue is secured to recipient corneal tissue via peripheral sutures. Meanwhile, endothelial keratoplasty (EK) has evolved to the use of appositional intracameral gas bubbles and ophthalmic viscoelastic solution.

3. Presurgical Protocols

Proper patient selection is key to yielding reasonable CT outcomes. A thorough corneal, anterior and gross posterior segment evaluation, in addition to a systemic workup, should ideally be carried out prior to qualifying all potential CT candidates. With regard to preoperative corneal evaluation, the depth of corneal tissue scarring and evidence of corneal ectasia should be determined. Detection of keratic precipitates (mutton fat, stellate or pigmented) indicates active or latent migration and deposition of immune moieties. The resultant hyperimmune sensitization disrupts the ocular immune privilege, decreasing the chances of post-graft tissue survival by more than four-fold [17]. Established intrastromal corneal neovascularization also often portends enhanced migration of phagocytes to host corneal tissue, thus compromising ocular immune privilege [18]. Clinical signs of anterior synechiae should also be looked out for, especially for EK candidates. When significant corneal stromal haze or widespread leucomatous scarring impairs intraocular evaluation, imaging modalities such as anterior segment-ocular coherence tomography (AS-OCT), ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM), and B scan ultrasonography can be respectively utilized to gain a gross outline of individualized intraocular integrity. Corneal central thickness (CCT) measurements with pachymetry have, in the past, been correlated with corneal endothelial cell (CEC) loss [19], mostly among contact lens wearers and pseudophakic individuals [20]; hence, it may be an empirical indicator of viable host endothelial physiology prior to lamellar keratoplasty [21]. The patient’s innate or adaptive immune status plays a fundamental role in CT outcomes, especially in terms of the risk of post-graft rejection [22]. Under normal circumstances, the trilaminar cornea is devoid of lymphocytes. The cornea’s innate defense systems are provided by bacteriostatic enzymes in the tear film, the equilibrium of microbiome/normal flora on the ocular surface and the corneal epithelial barrier attributes [23]. This innate non-infiltrated status of healthy corneal tissue is commonly termed the “ocular immune privilege”. In cases of chronic infectious or inflammatory keratitis, however, polymorphonuclear lymphocytes are sensitized to migrate to offended corneal tissue, either through circulation via aqueous humor and/or progression of capillary vascular loops within corneal interstices [24]. These adaptive changes in corneal physiology have been linked with very poor graft survival outcomes post-CT. Host tissue fitting these unwanted criteria is advisably ruled out for allograft CT [25]. Standardized procedures of donor corneal tissue viability analysis are usually followed prior to harvesting and cryopreservation with corneal banks [26]. With regards to recipient immune status, physiological or disease states inducing immune dysregulation [25] such as pregnancy, poorly managed diabetes mellitus (DM), active tuberculosis, an acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) or human immune virus (HIV) with low CD4 counts should be screened out. Rooij et al. conducted a comparative analysis of three standard methods of CT for the management of Fuchs endothelial dystrophy. They found that there was no significant difference between improvement using conventional PK, inverted mushroom PK and DSAEK [27].

4. Sources of Cornea Transplant Material

Globally, the need for donor corneal tissue to ease the burden of avoidable corneal blindness far outweighs the availability of viable graft tissue for CT [26]. The demand for viable corneal grafts is further increased by the need for repeat keratoplasty for eyes with a previous history of graft rejection [28]. Although widespread socioeconomic and religious differences contribute to difficulties with harvesting corneas promptly postmortem, other morphological, anatomical and physiological hindrances skew the demand-supply of corneal grafts to the negative [29]. The scarcity of corneal allografts suggests that alternative strategies for obtaining viable cornea transplant material could help close the gap, particularly in developing and underdeveloped areas [30]. Safe strategies for extending the viability period of donor tissue before allografting have been explored [31]. Glycerol-preserved corneas have been deemed comparable to fresh corneal tissue for emergent transplantation needs [32]. Conventionally, penetrating keratoplasty is carried out using allograft [28]. The implantation of “cell-free” biomaterials enabling corneal regeneration may evolve into human applications in the future, particularly for high-risk CT cases. This transplantation strategy has been applied to porcine eyes via anterior lamellar keratoplasty, with good tissue stability but inconsistent visual resolution accounted for [33]. Autologous graft sourcing also represents a viable strategy in rare cases where healthy corneal tissue on the contralateral side may not be of great functionality due to late comorbid ocular disease [34]. Homonymous corneal transplantation has been carried out post-enucleation for a patient with a central leucoma on the right eye and large choroidal melanoma on the left eye; findings thus far suggest that preoperative histopathological assessment of corneal-limbal tissue may be reliable enough to evade chances of neoplastic spread via autografting from such diseased eyes [34]. Corneal transplantation of autologous tragal perichondrium with an amniotic membrane overlay has been reported to yield symptomatic relief among patients with bullous keratopathy compared to controls [35]. Culturing human corneal endothelial cells from mesenchymal stem cells originating from the neural crest has also been explored [36].

5. Wound Healing after Cornea Transplant—New Perspectives

A common complication of wound healing is neovascularization. Topical bevacizumab application post-CT four times daily for 24 weeks was found to statistically reduce the occurrence of neovascularization [37]. Better results were obtained when bevacizumab was administered subconjunctivally compared to topically [38]. Immune rejection after CT has been successfully managed via donor-derived, tolerogenic dendritic cells [39]. A blockade of E-selectin adhesion receptors [40] has been shown to prolong CT graft survival. The monoclonal antibody RMT1-10 also enhanced the survival of corneal allografts in-situ [41]. Matching donor and recipient human leukocyte antigens (HLA) may also prevent an autoimmune breakdown of the graft after CT [42]. Topical application of cyclosporine nanomicelle eye drops (CNED) may also suppress the immune response by downregulating the NF-κB and ICAM-1 expression [43].

6. Other Uses of Corneal Transplants

In cases where there is a severe corneal ulceration threatening the integrity of the globe, a penetrating keratoplasty can be the last chance of saving that eye [44]. The key cutoff is when the corneal endothelium is compromised. Therapeutic-tectonic penetrating keratoplasty continues to show promise in eyes affected by infectious corneal ulcers. Jafarinasab et al. published a review of 32 eyes that had suffered blunt trauma and were at high risk of globe rupture due to corneal perforation secondary to infections. Twenty-six eyes eventually underwent penetrating keratoplasty, and five underwent DALK. One eye was managed with a Tectonic graft [45]. They reported significant improvements in globe stability, although some eyes suffered a recurrence of the presenting infections. Doğan and Arslan reported even better outcomes, with 42 out of 43 patients achieving stable globe integrity [46].

7. Preparation and Storage of Donor Corneas

Corneal donation involves identifying a potential donor eye, preparing the eye for removal of the graft, extraction of donor tissue and storage. Therefore, the preparation of corneal grafts takes up a critical stage in this regard due to the high demand for cornea tissue and relatively lower supply [47][48]. Intra-operative optical coherence tomography has been useful in the preparations of corneal tissue during extraction. Donor tissue preparation can also be done under this new technology [49]. This technique showed a remarkable 98.5% match with other standard clinical grading. Specular spectroscopy can be used to evaluate endothelial cell density. Modis et al. suggested that specular and non-specular spectroscopy can be used as exchangeable [50]. Bonci et al. compared two methods of preparation of donor corneas; one method used a Hanna trephine with an external chamber, while the other used the same Hanna trephine but with a punch [51]. The methods extracted the donor cornea along the epithelium-endothelium and endothelium-epithelium directions, respectively. The study revealed that endothelial cell density (ECD) loss was less in the epithelium-endothelium cut corneas. As ophthalmic surgeons are ultimately responsible for carrying out these procedures, it is imperative that they keep abreast with different developments in the field by retraining and reviewing relevant literature. Hagenah and Winter reviewed recent trends in globe disinfection before graft extraction [52]. They suggested a 3% povidone-iodine solution for disinfecting the globes. It is also advised that extracted corneal tissue should be secured in a corneoscleral disc for some time to antibiotics neutralize any remaining contaminants. They recommended that storage containers can be sealed or changed every two weeks under aseptic conditions [52]. Wykrota et al. examined activities at an Eye bank over a period of nine years and reported that low endothelial cell count (ECC) was the most common reason for discarding banked corneas, followed by tissue contamination [53]. Solley et al. reported a new device for preparing grafts via Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in diabetic and non-diabetic eyes. This new device, the DescePrep, performed well with a 97% success rate and average cell death post-extraction at 7.9% ± 3.7% for all corneas [54]. The ECD can be a very important indicator of the eventual viability of the graft. Gupta and Gupta examined 100 eyes that received corneal transplants within a two-year period over periodic intervals. They reported that the most endothelial cell loss was seen in patients undergoing a repeat graft, while keratoconus-grafted eyes showed the lowest loss [55]. Another study found that while ECD was not related to endothelial decompensation after transplant, it was positively r = correlated with the same at six months post-operation [56]. This study also reported a drop in ECD to lower than 500 cells/mm2 in 14% of its participants and co-morbidities in corneal transplant medicine. This relative scarcity of corneas for transplant puts their storage on the front burner for many researchers. The numbers of overall grafts properly stored and the eventual viability of the grafts when needed for eventual transplant are two key indices that can advise on the progress of corneal tissue storage development. Garcin et al. developed an active storage device which they called a bioreactor and compared its preservation abilities versus the organ culture storage technique. They published results showing that the bioreactor had a 23% higher rate of endothelial cell survival than the organ culture technique [57]. They also reported better transparency and tissue integrity in the corneas stored using the bioreactor as compared to the organ culture technique. The authors also showed increased longevity of tissue preservation by using active storage. They conducted a random trial using 24 paired corneas equally split between organ culture and their active storage machine. Their study showed that the active storage system maintained tissue integrity, endothelial cell viability, and numbers in addition to the expression of biochemical stability markers like CD166. In contrast, the organ culture-stored corneas were all found to be unsuitable for corneal transplant at the same time period [58]. Generally, the causes of CT failure have been classified into:
  • Failure of the cornea graft (PGF).
  • Immunological reaction by the host to the graft [59].
  • Non-immunological factors such as spontaneous decompensation, glaucoma and diseases [60][61]. Wound dehiscence and surgical trauma are included in this classification [62].
  • Other distinct factors [63].
The cornea endothelium is an inner barrier to edematous damage from aqueous humor breaching into the cornea. Endothelial cell count (CEC) is therefore essential to assess the ability of the eye to retain this protective ability. Studies have shown that the CEC is significantly reduced when corneas are extracted for grafting [64]. Jafarinasab et al. reported on the outcomes of CT in 32 eyes that had previously suffered globe rupture. They reported a progressive reduction in stability in the host-graft interface. They also suggested that an uncompromised Descemet’s membrane layer can help to mitigate this occurrence [65]. This Endothelium/Descemet complex thickness (En/DMT) is a good indicator of the prognosis of stability after a successful CT. In fact, an increased En/DMT thickness is an indicator of tissue rejection post-CT, especially in high-risk corneas [66]. Cytokine elevation has also been observed in eyes that suffered CT failure [67], although topical postoperative drugs like levofloxacin, Fk506 and dexamethasone had no deleterious effect when used post-PKP [68][69]. Any disruption in the normal homeostatic and tissue balance in the cornea can first result in corneal haze (CH) [69]. Pentacam Scheimpflug densitometry was used to measure CH in 44 and an incidence of 6.8% (95%CI: 1.4–18.7%) in a tertiary hospital-based study [70]. Corneal densitometry measured 21.86 ± 6.22 GSU preoperatively in the 44 eyes. However, this reduced to 21.23 ± 4.29 GSU at 12 months postoperatively (p = 0.815). Wound dehiscence is a common complication post-CT. A study was conducted in the Riyal Eye and Ear hospital to assess the incidence and clinical demographic of 72 eyes who visited a center for surgery [71]. Perioperative wound dehiscence may also occur at the host-graft junction and lead to a failure of the CT [72]. The presence of lymphatic vessels within neovascularized failed CT has also been implicated. It remains to be determined if this suggests a new direction for future preventive management [73]. Fine needle diathermy has been indicated as a novel method of managing this lymphangiogenesis [74]. Corneal opacities impede intraoperative visualization during cataract extraction and vitreoretinal surgery [75]. Performing keratoplasty prior to other secondary intraocular surgeries, however, may risk graft tissue viability. Hence, bi-procedural approaches have been explored. Combined keratoplasty and pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) has been successfully performed. The study reported, however, high rates of graft failure, which were correlated with active intraoperative corneal inflammation [76]. Planned EK following cataract surgery has also been recommended amongst patients with endothelial dysfunctions: dystrophic, degenerative or secondary to ocular disease like glaucoma [75]. Features consistent with the ocular dysgenesis disorder, aniridia, have been shown to manifest onto donor corneal buttons following transplantation to diseased corneas [77]. Clinicians should also note that patients receiving immune checkpoint medication are at risk of CT rejection [78]. Common systemic conditions like diabetes can encourage infection and delay wound healing. Infective agents/diseases have also been implicated as sources of poor outcomes. Donors may be the source of infective pathogens that eventually lead to a CT rejection in the future. A Saudi Arabia study found that 0.88% of donated corneas used in 684 CT cases were positive for infective pathogens [79]. Candida infections are commonly reported as culprits in CT failure [80]. In a review of 789 eyes that underwent CT at two Indian centers, five eyes (0.63%) developed complications secondary to Candida infections. Contributing risk factors were prolonged steroid use, repeated CT, and cornea epithelial weakness [81]. Another study at a different center reported an incidence of microbial keratitis in 4.77% of 1508 eyes that had undergone CT [82]. Natamycin and voriconazole have been suggested as viable therapeutic regimens for managing Candida infections [83]. Mucormycosis has been registered post-deep-anterior-lamellar-keratoplasty (DALK) [84], with a suggestion to manage any sinusitis in a diabetic patient before attempting CT surgery. Giurgola et al. have suggested that Kerasave, a new synthetic product, may drastically reduce in-vitro contamination of donor corneas [85]. Animal models have also indicated that injection of mesenchymal stem cells may limit acute post-CT inflammation [86]. Non-infective unforeseen events can also complicate the CT process. Jarstad et al. reported a case of cardiac failure in an otherwise healthy young adult during CT surgery that was successfully managed [87]. Another common complication of CT is glaucoma [88]. Management may include pharmacological agents or surgery. Studies have shown that surgery for glaucoma after CT has been implicated in CT rejection [89]. Rare conditions like monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance are also implicated, especially in the presence of elevated levels of abnormal M proteins [90]. Paniz-Mondolfi et al. also reported the isolation of Colletotrichum chlorophyti in an eye with postoperative endophthalmitis after CT [91]. Another study reported a post-CT infection of Alternaria alternate [92]. The human cytomegalovirus (CMV) is known to attack tissue all over the body. Like all viral conditions, it can lie dormant for extended periods and become active without warning. CMV endothelitis results in loss of CEC and subsequent poor prognosis. As with any grafting procedure, immunologic interactions between the host and donor tissue can be problematic. However, non-immunologic factors can also be a factor in the loss of CEC, even with patients receiving autologous CT [93]. Repeat transplant/graft procedures are also a risk factor in the failure of CT. Aboshisha et al. conducted a large-scale study to examine the survival rates for regraft procedures for keratoconus, Fuch’s endothelial dystrophy, and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK). PK and EK were the procedures of choice for FE dystrophy and PBK, while PK and DALK were the procedures of choice for keratoconus [94]. Sometimes, the failure is not in the procedure nor the result but in the patient’s experiences after CT [95]. Masmoudi et al. reported a patient suffering from Charles Bonnet syndrome after CT [96].

References

  1. Rates, E.R.D.; Almeida, C.D.; Costa, E.D.P.F.; Farias, R.J.D.M.; Santos-Oliveira, R.; Alencar, L.M.R. Layer-by-layer investigation of ultrastructures and biomechanics of human cornea. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 7833.
  2. Musa, M.J.; Zeppieri, M. Principles and Technique of Fogging during Subjective Refraction; StatPearls: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2022.
  3. Sridhar, M.S. Anatomy of cornea and ocular surface. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2018, 66, 190–194.
  4. Rémont, L.; Duchesne, B.; La, C.; Rakic, J.M.; Hick, S. Updates in corneal transplantation. Rev. Med. de Liege 2014, 69, 490–496.
  5. Mota, S.H.-D.; Jacobo, M.P.; Revuelta, G.G.; Martínez, R.M.P. Corneal transplant in a second level hospital. A survival analysis. Gac. Med. De Mex. 2013, 149, 425–430.
  6. Belghmaidi, S.; Hajji, I.; Soummane, H.; Ennassiri, W.; Essafi, H.; Moutaouakil, A. Corneal transplantation: Study carried out at the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Center Mohammed VI, Marrakech. Pan. Afr. Med. J. 2016, 23, 158.
  7. Studený, P.; Hamouz, J.; Kuchynka, P. Corneal transplantations in the Czech Republic in 2012. Czech Slovak Ophthalmol. 2014, 70, 224–227.
  8. Verdiguel-Sotelo, K.; Carrasco-Quiroz, A.; Rangel-Servín, J. Prognostic category of corneal transplantation in a referal center. Rev. Med. Del Inst. Mex. Del Seguro Soc. 2016, 54, 738–745.
  9. Sabater-Cruz, N.; Figueras-Roca, M.; Padró-Pitarch, L.; Tort, J.; Casaroli-Marano, R.P. Corneal transplantation activity in Catalonia, Spain, from 2011 to 2018: Evolution of indications and surgical techniques. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0249946.
  10. Galvis, V.; Tello, A.; Gomez, A.J.; Rangel, C.M.; Prada, A.M.; Camacho, P.A. Corneal transplantation at an ophthalmological referral center in colombia: Indications and techniques (2004–2011). Open Ophthalmol. J. 2013, 7, 30–33.
  11. Chen, M.C.; Kunselman, A.R.; Stetter, C.M.; Hannush, S.B.; Roberts, B.W. Corneal transplantation at Tenwek Hospital, Kenya, East Africa: Analysis of outcomes and associated patient socioeconomic characteristics. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0187026.
  12. Hwang, S.; Chung, T.-Y.; Han, J.; Kim, K.; Lim, D.H. Corneal transplantation for keratoconus in South Korea. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 12580.
  13. Sarnicola, C.; Sarnicola, E.; Cheung, A.Y.; Sarnicola, V. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty: Can all ruptures be fixed? Cornea 2023, 42, 80–88.
  14. Qureshi, S.; Dohlman, T.H. Penetrating keratoplasty: Indications and graft survival by geographic region. Semin. Ophthalmol. 2022, 38, 31–43.
  15. Sharma, N.; Mandal, S.; Asif, M.; Maharana, P.; Titiyal, J. A review of techniques and outcomes of endothelial keratoplasty in congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2022, 70, 4108.
  16. Goodman, C.F.B.; Mittal, R.B.; Awidi, A.; Vanner, E.A.; Han, E.; Daoud, Y.J.; Koo, E.H. Outcomes of secondary intraocular lens implantation and descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty—Comparing staged versus combined surgical approach. Cornea, 2022; publish ahead.
  17. Shahrudin, N.A.; Zahidin, A.Z.M.; Noh, U.K.; Halim, W.H.; Din, N. CMV endotheliitis: A cause for recurrent failed corneal transplant. GMS Ophthalmol. Cases 2017, 7, Doc31.
  18. Zhong, W.; Montana, M.; Santosa, S.M.; Isjwara, I.D.; Huang, Y.-H.; Han, K.-Y.; O’Neil, C.; Wang, A.; Cortina, M.S.; de la Cruz, J.; et al. Angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in corneal transplantation–A review. Surv. Ophthalmol. 2018, 63, 453–479.
  19. Verdier, D.D.; Sugar, A.; Baratz, K.; Beck, R.; Dontchev, M.; Dunn, S.; Gal, R.L.; Holland, E.J.; Kollman, C.; Lass, J.H.; et al. Corneal thickness as a predictor of corneal transplant outcome. Cornea 2013, 32, 729–736.
  20. Zhou, H.W.; Xie, L.X. Effects of cataract surgery on endothelium in transplanted corneal grafts: Comparison of extracapsular cataract extraction and phacoemulsification for complicated cataract after penetrating keratoplasty. Chin. Med. J. 2016, 129, 2096–2101.
  21. Steger, B.; Kaye, S.B.; Romano, V. Corneal transplantation: The fine line between donor shortage and tissue quality. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2022, 7, e001046.
  22. Niederkorn, J.Y. Corneal transplantation and immune privilege. Int. Rev. Immunol. 2013, 32, 57–67.
  23. Shaharuddin, B.; Ahmad, S.; Meeson, A.; Ali, S. Concise review: Immunological properties of ocular surface and importance of limbal stem cells for transplantation. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2013, 2, 614–624.
  24. Armitage, W.J.; Goodchild, C.; Griffin, M.D.; Gunn, D.J.; Hjortdal, J.; Lohan, P.; Murphy, C.C.; Pleyer, U.; Ritter, T.; Tole, D.M.; et al. High-risk corneal transplantation: Recent developments and future possibilities. Transplantation 2019, 103, 2468–2478.
  25. Major, J.; Foroncewicz, B.; Szaflik, J.P.; Mucha, K. Immunology and Donor-Specific Antibodies in Corneal Transplantation. Arch. Immunol. Et Ther. Exp. 2021, 69, 32.
  26. Boynton, G.E.; Woodward, M.A. Eye-bank preparation of endothelial tissue. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 2014, 25, 319–324.
  27. Van Rooij, J.; Lucas, E.H.; Geerards, A.J.; Remeijer, L.; Wubbels, R. Corneal transplantation for Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy: A comparison of three surgical techniques concerning 10 year graft survival and visual function. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0203993.
  28. Akpek, E.K.; Alkharashi, M.; Hwang, F.; Ng, S.M.; Lindsley, K. Artificial corneas versus donor corneas for repeat corneal transplants. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014, 11, CD009561.
  29. Arya, S.K.; Raj, A.; Deswal, J.; Kohli, P.; Rai, R. Donor demographics and factors affecting corneal utilisation in Eye Bank of North India. Int. Ophthalmol. 2021, 41, 1773–1781.
  30. Fu, L.; Hollick, E.J. Artificial Cornea Transplantation; StatPearls: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2022.
  31. AlMutlak, M.; Li, J.Y.; Bin Helayel, H.; Fairaq, R. Future of corneal donation and transplantation: Insights from the COVID-19 pandemic. Cornea 2020, 40, 274–276.
  32. Gupta, N.; Dhasmana, R.; Maitreya, A.; Badahur, H. Glycerol-preserved corneal tissue in emergency corneal transplantation: An alternative for fresh corneal tissue in COVID-19 crisis. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2020, 68, 1412–1416.
  33. Islam, M.M.; Buznyk, O.; Reddy, J.C.; Pasyechnikova, N.; Alarcon, E.I.; Hayes, S.; Lewis, P.; Fagerholm, P.; He, C.; Iakymenko, S.; et al. Biomaterials-enabled cornea regeneration in patients at high risk for re-jection of donor tissue transplantation. NPJ Regen. Med. 2018, 3, 2.
  34. Iglicki, M.; Loewenstein, A.; Manera, M.; Castro, C.; Busch, C.; Zur, D.; Negri, H.P. Autologous corneal transplant from an enucleated fellow eye for choroidal melanoma: A case report. Case Rep. Ophthalmol. 2020, 11, 181–188.
  35. Kim, K.W.; Chun, Y.S.; Kim, J.C. Autologous tragal perichondrium transplantation: A novel approach for the management of painful bullous keratopathy. Korean J. Ophthalmol. 2013, 27, 149–157.
  36. Parekh, M.; Ferrari, S.; Sheridan, C.; Kaye, S.; Ahmad, S. Concise review: An update on the culture of human corneal en-dothelial cells for transplantation. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2016, 5, 258–264.
  37. Bhatti, N.; Qidwai, U.S.A.; Hussain, M.; Kazi, A. Efficacy of topical bevacizumab in high-risk corneal transplant survival. Pak. J. Med. Sci. 2013, 29, 519–522.
  38. Bhatti, N.; Qidwai, U.; Hussain, M.; Kazi, A. Efficacy of sub-conjunctival and topical bevacizumab in high-risk corneal transplant survival. J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 2013, 63, 1256–1259.
  39. Hattori, T.; Saban, D.R.; Emami-Naeini, P.; Chauhan, S.K.; Funaki, T.; Ueno, H.; Dana, R. Donor-derived, tolerogenic dendritic cells suppress immune rejection in the indirect allosensitization-dominant setting of corneal transplantation. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2012, 91, 621–627.
  40. Dohlman, T.; Di Zazzo, A.; Omoto, M.; Hua, J.; Ding, J.; Hamrah, P.; Chauhan, S.K.; Dana, R. E-selectin mediates immune cell trafficking in corneal transplantation. Transplantation 2016, 100, 772–780.
  41. Guo, Y.-Y.; Yin, C.-J.; Zhao, M.; Guo, L.-T.; Su, R.-F.; Fu, X.-X.; Dong, W.-L.; Tan, X.-B. Effect of RMT1-10 on the immunological characteristics of dendritic cells cultured in vitro and corneal transplantation in vivo. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2019, 23, 9150–9162.
  42. Sachdeva, G.S.; Cabada, J.P.; Karim, S.S.; Kahandawa, D.L.; Thomas, K.A.; Kumar, A.; Barry, R.J.; Butt, G.F. Effectiveness of matching human leukocyte antigens (HLA) in corneal transplantation: A systematic review protocol. Syst. Rev. 2021, 10, 150.
  43. Zhang, H.; Wang, L.; Zhang, L. Cyclosporine nanomicelle eye drop: A novel medication for corneal graft transplantation treatment. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2015, 38, 893–900.
  44. Singh, R.; Gupta, N.; Vanathi, M.; Tandon, R. Corneal transplantation in the modern era. Indian J. Med. Res. 2019, 150, 7–22.
  45. Jafarinasab, M.R.; Feizi, S.; Esfandiari, H.; Kheiri, B.; Feizi, M. Traumatic wound dehiscence following corneal transplanta-tion. J. Ophthalmic Vis. Res. 2012, 7, 214–218.
  46. Doğan, C.; Arslan, O. Outcomes of therapeutic and tectonic penetrating keratoplasty in eyes with perforated infectious corneal ulcer. Turk. J. Ophthalmol. 2019, 49, 55–60.
  47. Linke, S.J.; Eddy, M.-T.; Bednarz, J.; Fricke, O.H.; Wulff, B.; Schröder, A.-S.; Hassenstein, A.; Klemm, M.; Püschel, K.; Richard, G.; et al. Thirty years of cornea cultivation: Long-term experience in a single eye bank. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012, 91, 571–578.
  48. Sharma, N.; Nathawat, R.; Parihar, J.S. Policy framework for advancing eye banking and cornea transplantation. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2021, 69, 2563.
  49. Agarwal, R.; Shakarwal, C.; Sharma, N.; Titiyal, J. Intraoperative optical coherence tomography-guided donor corneal tissue assessment and preparation. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2022, 70, 3496.
  50. Modis, L., Jr.; Langenbucher, A.; Seitz, B. Corneal endothelial cell density and pachymetry measured by contact and noncontact specular microscopy. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 2002, 28, 1763–1769.
  51. Bonci, P.; Della Valle, V.; Lia, A. Preparation of donor corneas: A study of the endothelial population. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 2008, 18, 341–344.
  52. Hagenah, M.; Winter, R. Disinfection of human donor corneas during preparation and preservation. Klin. Monbl. Augenheilkd. 1996, 209, 1–6.
  53. Wykrota, A.A.; Weinstein, I.; Hamon, L.; Daas, L.; Flockerzi, E.; Suffo, S.; Seitz, B. Approval rates for corneal donation and the origin of donor tissue for transplantation at a university-based tertiary referral center with corneal subspecialization hosting a LIONS Eye Bank. BMC Ophthalmol. 2022, 22, 17.
  54. Solley, K.D.; Berges, A.; Diaz, C.; Ostrander, B.T.; Ding, A.S.; Larson, S.A.; Frank, K.; Lee, D.; Guerrero, J.; deCarvalho, T.; et al. Evaluation of efficacy, efficiency, and cell viability of a novel descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty graft preparation device, DescePrep, in nondiabetic and diabetic human donor corneas. Cornea 2022, 41, 505–511.
  55. Gupta, A.K.; Gupta, R.K. Quantitative & qualitative analysis of endothelial cells of donor cornea before & after penetrating keratoplasty in different pathological conditions. Indian J. Med. Res. 2016, 143, 213–219.
  56. Lass, J.H.; Sugar, A.; Benetz, B.A.; Beck, R.W.; Dontchev, M.; Gal, R.L.; Kollman, C.; Gross, R.; Heck, E.; Holland, E.J.; et al. Endothelial cell density to predict endothelial graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2010, 128, 63–69.
  57. Garcin, T.; Gauthier, A.-S.; Crouzet, E.; He, Z.; Herbepin, P.; Perrache, C.; Acquart, S.; Cognasse, F.; Forest, F.; Thuret, G.; et al. Innovative corneal active storage machine for long-term eye banking. Am. J. Transplant. 2018, 19, 1641–1651.
  58. Garcin, T.; Gauthier, A.-S.; Crouzet, E.; He, Z.; Herbepin, P.; Perrache, C.; Acquart, S.; Cognasse, F.; Forest, F.; Gain, P.; et al. Three-month storage of human corneas in an active storage machine. Transplantation 2020, 104, 1159–1165.
  59. Amouzegar, A.; Chauhan, S.K.; Dana, R. Alloimmunity and tolerance in corneal transplantation. J. Immunol. 2016, 196, 3983–3991.
  60. Martheswaran, T.; Desautels, J.D.; Moshirfar, M.; Shmunes, K.M.; Ronquillo, Y.; Hoopes, P.C. A contemporary risk analysis of iatrogenic transmission of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD) via corneal transplantation in the United States. Ophthalmol. Ther. 2020, 9, 465–483.
  61. Soda, R.; Fukuoka, H.; Sotozono, C. A case of recurrent fungal keratitis post-amniotic membrane transplantation for corneal perforation. Case Rep. Ophthalmol. 2022, 13, 147–153.
  62. Chow, K.M.; Alias, R. A 10-Year retrospective case series on wound dehiscence following corneal transplant. Cureus 2022, 14, e25184.
  63. Gómez-Benlloch, A.; Montesel, A.; Pareja-Aricò, L.; Mingo-Botín, D.; Michael, R.; Barraquer, R.I.; Alió, J. Causes of corneal transplant failure: A multicentric study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2021, 99, e922–e928.
  64. Chauhan, S.K.; Jurkunas, U.; Funaki, T.; Dastjerdi, M.; Dana, R. Quantification of allospecific and nonspecific corneal endo-thelial cell damage after corneal transplantation. Eye 2015, 29, 136–144.
  65. Gellert, A.; Unterlauft, J.D.; Rehak, M.; Girbardt, C. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) improves vi-sion-related quality of life. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2022, 260, 3639–3645.
  66. Eleiwa, T.; Elsawy, A.; Ozcan, E.; Chase, C.; Feuer, W.; Yoo, S.H.; Perez, V.L.; Shousha, M.F.A. Prediction of corneal graft rejection using central endothelium/Descemet’s membrane complex thickness in high-risk corneal transplants. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 14542.
  67. Yamaguchi, T.; Higa, K.; Tsubota, K.; Shimazaki, J. Elevation of preoperative recipient aqueous cytokine levels in eyes with primary graft failure after corneal transplantation. Mol. Vis. 2018, 24, 613–620.
  68. Fodor, M.; Petrovski, G.; Pásztor, D.; Gogolák, P.; Rajnavölgyi, É.; Berta, A. Effects of Awakening and the Use of Topical Dexamethasone and Levofloxacin on the Cytokine Levels in Tears Following Corneal Transplantation. J. Immunol. Res. 2014, 2014, 570685.
  69. Yuan, J.; Zhai, J.-J.; Huang, X.; Zhou, S.-Y.; Chen, J.-Q. Ocular Safety and Pharmacokinetics Study of FK506 Suspension Eye Drops After Corneal Transplantation. J. Ocul. Pharmacol. Ther. 2012, 28, 153–158.
  70. Khattak, A.; An-Nakhli, F. Incidence and quantification of corneal haze by Pentacam Scheimpflug densitometry following photorefractive keratectomy for myopia in virgin and post corneal transplant eyes with dark irides. Saudi J. Ophthalmol. 2020, 34, 8–12.
  71. Stevenson, L.J.; Abell, R.G.; McGuinness, M.B.; Vajpayee, R.B. Comparative evaluation of clinical characteristics and visual outcomes of traumatic and non-traumatic graft dehiscence following corneal transplantation surgery. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2019, ume 13, 2243–2249.
  72. Learned, D.L.; Gupta, C.K.; Stec, L.A.; Heidemann, D.G. Perioperative corneal transplant wound dehiscence. Anesthesiology 2016, 124, 185.
  73. Diamond, M.A.; Chan, S.W.S.; Zhou, X.; Glinka, Y.; Girard, E.; Yucel, Y.; Gupta, N. Lymphatic vessels identified in failed corneal transplants with neovascularisation. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2018, 103, 421–427.
  74. Le, V.N.H.; Schneider, A.-C.; Scholz, R.; Bock, F.; Cursiefen, C. Fine Needle-Diathermy Regresses Pathological Corneal (Lymph)Angiogenesis and Promotes High-Risk Corneal Transplant Survival. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 5707.
  75. Bourges, J.L. When cataracts lead to a corneal transplant. Med. Sci. 2020, 36, 747–751.
  76. Oh, J.Y.; Lee, D.S.; Heo, J.W.; Choi, H.J.; Kim, M.K.; Wee, W.R. Combined corneal allotransplantation and vitreoretinal surgery using an Eckardt temporary keratoprosthesis: Analysis for factors determining corneal allograft survival. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2014, 8, 449–454.
  77. Vicente, A.; Byström, B.; Lindström, M.; Stenevi, U.; Domellöf, F.P. Aniridia-related keratopathy: Structural changes in naïve and transplanted corneal buttons. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0198822.
  78. Moshirfar, M.; Basharat, N.F.; Seitz, T.S.; Ply, B.K.; Ronquillo, Y.C.; Hoopes, P.C. Corneal Transplant Rejections in Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 5647.
  79. Almulhim, A.; Alnaim, A.F.; Abdulrazek, A.; Alotaibi, H.A. Incidence and outcomes of transplant of infected donor corneal tissues in a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia. Cureus 2022, 14, e25514.
  80. Cabra-Rodríguez, R.; Tenorio-Abreu, A.; Breval, I.Z.-Y. Candida parapsilosis infection in a corneal transplant patient. Rev. Esp. Quim. 2018, 31, 285–287.
  81. Sati, A.; Wagh, S.; Mishra, S.; Kumar, S.; Kumar, P. Post-corneal transplant Candida keratitis—Incidence and outcome. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2022, 70, 536.
  82. Griffin, B.; Walkden, A.; Okonkwo, A.; Au, L.; Brahma, A.; Carley, F. Microbial keratitis in corneal transplants: A 12-year analysis. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2020, ume 14, 3591–3597.
  83. van der Wekken-Pas, L.; de Haas, P.; Wisse, R.; Rados, M.; van der Elst, K. Candida keratitis and endopthalmitis after corneal transplantation; two case reports, a novel regimen and literature overview of therapeutic options. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 2021.
  84. Raffa, L. Rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis following penetrating keratoplasty. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2019, 2019, rjz314.
  85. Giurgola, L.; Gatto, C.; Honisch, C.; Rossi, O.; Ragazzi, E.; Tothova, J.D. Killing efficacy of a new hypothermic corneal storage medium against the micro-organisms frequently found in human donor cornea intended for transplantation. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2021, 6, e000833.
  86. Oh, J.Y.; Lee, R.H.; Yu, J.M.; Ko, J.H.; Lee, H.J.; Ko, A.Y.; Roddy, G.W.; Prockop, D.J. Intravenous mesenchymal stem cells prevented rejection of allogeneic corneal transplants by aborting the early inflammatory response. Mol. Ther. 2012, 20, 2143–2152.
  87. Jarstad, A.; Chou, J.; Garg, S. Cardiac arrest during cornea transplant surgery. BMJ Case Rep. 2020, 13, e235272.
  88. Kornmann, H.L.; Gedde, S.J. Glaucoma management after corneal transplantation surgeries. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 2016, 27, 132–139.
  89. Al-Mahmood, A.M.; Al-Swailem, S.A.; Edward, D.P. Glaucoma and Corneal Transplant Procedures. J. Ophthalmol. 2012, 2012, 576394.
  90. Nobacht, S.; Kusters, B.; Breukink, M.B.; Rongen, G.A.; Cruysberg, J.R.M. Recurrence of paraproteinemic crystalline ker-atopathy after corneal transplantation: A case of monoclonal gammopathy of ocular significance. Am. J. Ophthalmol. Case Rep. 2020, 19, 100803.
  91. Paniz-Mondolfi, A.E.; Agemy, S.; Canete-Gibas, C.; Gitman, M.R.; Iacob, C.E.; Necula, I.; Wang, C.Y.; Delgado Noguera, L.A.; Sanders, C.; Wiederhold, N.P.; et al. First report of human infection caused by Colletotrichum chlo-rophyti occurring in a post-corneal transplant patient with endophthalmitis. Med. Mycol. Case Rep. 2021, 32, 73–76.
  92. Konidaris, V.; Mersinoglou, A.; Vyzantiadis, T.-A.; Papadopoulou, D.; Boboridis, K.G.; Ekonomidis, P. Corneal Transplant Infection due to Alternaria alternata: A Case Report. Case Rep. Ophthalmol. Med. 2013, 2013, 589620.
  93. Martinez, J.D.; Galor, A.; Perez, V.L.; Karp, C.L.; Yoo, S.H.; Alfonso, E.C. Endothelial graft failure after contralateral autologous corneal transplantation. Cornea 2013, 32, 745–750.
  94. Aboshiha, J.; Jones, M.N.A.; Hopkinson, C.L.; Larkin, D.F.P. Differential survival of penetrating and lamellar transplants in management of failed corneal grafts. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018, 136, 859.
  95. Tan, D.; Ang, M.; Arundhati, A.; Khor, W.-B. Development of selective lamellar keratoplasty within an asian corneal transplant program: The singapore corneal transplant study (an American ophthalmological society thesis). Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2015, 113, T10.
  96. Masmoudi, J.; Feki, I.; Trigui, D.; Baati, I.; Jaoua, A. Complex visual hallucinations secondary to corneal transplant: The Charles Bonnet syndrome. La Tunis. medicale 2015, 93, 396–397.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Academic Video Service
Feedback