Achievement Goal Orientation and Academic Engagement: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Rita Xu and Version 1 by Xiangli Guan.

Enhancing academic engagement in university students can help enrich students’ educational experience. Drawing on the Conservation of Resources Model and the Job Demand-Resources Model, exploring the links between undergraduates’ achievement goal orientation and academic engagement (AE), by examining the mediating functions of perceived school climate (PSC) and academic self-efficacy (ASE).

  • achievement goal orientation
  • perceived school climate

1. Background

Education is a solid foundation for a country’s economic and social sustainability. The report of the 41st UNESCO General Conference on 10 November 2021 explores how to improve the quality of student learning in a challenging future. Improving students’ AE is the key to improving their quality of study activities and education experience. AE is a rich, stable and sustained positive psychological state of individuals in learning activities and is divided into three dimensions: vitality, dedication and absorption [1]. Research has found that not only does AE positively correlate with academic performance [2,3][2][3] and promote university students’ academic achievement [4], but AE can also reduce college dropout rates. The reduction in the dropout rate of university students is an effective way to achieve equity and improve the standard of education [5,6][5][6]. Antecedents affecting AE have been of interest to researchers, such as with motivational factors—particularly how they positively [7] and negatively [8] predict the impact of achievement goal orientation on AE. However, the mechanisms by which achievement goal orientation influences AE in university student populations and how university students self-regulate their learning activities have not received sufficient attention from researchers. To address this gap, this study proposes a mediation model drawing on the Conservation of Resources (COR) Model [9] and the Job Demand-Resources (JD-R) Model [10], aiming to explore the mechanisms by which university students’ achievement goal orientation influences AE and explain how PSC and ASE can act as resources to promote self-regulated learning among university students.

2. Achievement Goal Orientation and Academic Engagement (AE)

Goal orientation is an important topic in the field of achievement motivation research. The dominant goal influences individual motivation and has a decisive impact on individual achievement behavior. Achievement goal orientation is a central component of student motivation and their ability to self-regulate learning [11,12][11][12]. Four dimensions of achievement goals are commonly used in existing research [7,8,13,14][7][8][13][14]. In tResearchis study, we ders draw on a couple of these four dimensions of achievement goals to verify the effect of different types of goals on AE in university students. The literature demonstrates that the association of mastery-avoidance goals and performance-approach goals with AE is controversial [8,12,15,16][8][12][15][16]. The present study was designed to verify the consistency of the actual observed phenomena with the results of existing studies and to investigate whether the findings of existing studies could be reproduced. Therefore, only two achievement goal dimensions were selected: MAGs and PAGs, in order to examine the influence of these goal orientations on AE in university students. MAGs are when individuals focus more on developing their skills and abilities, facilitating their own learning, understanding the content and completing or mastering a learning task [17]. PAGs are where individuals are more concerned with avoiding performing worse than others [18,19][18][19]. It was found that MAGs were able to positively predict AE [7,20,21][7][20][21]. PAGs often negatively predict AE [8] and academic achievement [20], leading to college dropouts and even depression [13]. It is evident that various kinds of goals can serve different purposes. Individuals who are driven by mastery-oriented goals define and evaluate their abilities as self-oriented or task-oriented, which tend to motivate them intrinsically; individuals who are driven by performance-oriented goals define and evaluate their abilities as more concerned with whether their performance is due to others, which leads to individuals being more susceptible to extrinsic motivation.

3. Mediating Effects of Perceived School Climate (PSC)

Extrinsic factors such as relational-based and environmental variables [17] can influence the relations between the two main study variables. For example, PSC has been shown to significantly influence students’ AE and academic achievement [22]. Social constructivism suggests that students learn by constructing cognitive schemas and internalizing knowledge into their own cognitive structures through social interactions with others [23]. In particular, school life is the primary place where students construct their own knowledge through interactions; students’ school experiences can influence their engagement and achievement—demonstrating the relevance one’s environment has on shaping learning experiences [24]. Students’ PSC are students’ intuitive feelings regarding the school climate expressed as their satisfaction with the living environment (e.g., structures, relationships and culture) [25]. Teachers have a major influence on students’ AE, particularly cognitive engagement [26]. Students who perceive teachers’ expectations and motivation are more likely to be motivated and develop an interest in learning [27].
However, there are differences in the perception of classroom climates between students which are affected by differences in goals; students in the same class perceived classroom goal structures differently [28]. Students who are performance goal-oriented prefer overt assessment by teachers, while students who are avoidance goal-oriented do not like learning tasks with mastery goals and they do not like challenging learning tasks [29]. The study found that positive PSC enhances students’ self-beliefs and contributes to students’ AE, which in turn affects their academic achievement [30]. PSC is plastic [31] and students are able to filter, perceive, interpret and translate the school climate through achievement goal orientation, which promotes the internalization of students’ motivation to learn and thus influences their AE.

4. Mediating Effects of Self-Efficacy (ASE)

In addition, the impact of goals on AE prediction is compromised if undergraduates are not confident in completing their learning activities [32]. Thus, the study must also consider the mediating role of the ASE, which is the individual’s expectation and judgment of being capable of completing the learning activities [33]. For university students, the ASE is a combination of recognition of the quality of their studies and confidence in their studies [34]. The higher the ASE, the more willing students are to engage in their studies [1,35,36][1][35][36]. ASE has also been shown to have a motivational effect on students’ AE for overcoming learning difficulties [35,36][35][36].
Students regulate their own learning through the interaction of two factors: the learning objectives and the ASE that influences the achievement of those objectives. When students are satisfied with their learning goals, they feel empowered to improve their abilities [36]. Thus, it appears that ASE has a medial role. Overall, achievement goal orientation directly affects university students’ ASE [20]. Students who succeed in an academic environment are more likely to effectively regulate the interaction of internal goal orientation and ASE [37]. It is clear that an active learning goal orientation (LGO), as well as a stronger ASE, are important mechanisms and viable ways to promote academic achievement among university students. In particular, positive learning goals can promote students’ performance by improving their ASE.

5. The Chain Mediating Effect of Perceived School Climate (PSC) and Academic Self-Efficacy (ASE)

The impact of the learning climate on individual students’ academic performance [38] is an important factor that can influence the role different types of goals have on AE. Examples of the classroom climate components that can determine ASE are teaching objectives, teacher motivation and expectations [39]. Positive student experiences in the school environment can counteract feelings of incompetence [40] and ameliorates the influence on one’s willingness to learn [41]. The learning environment can trigger changes in the ASE; this learning environment creates a sense of belonging to the subject, which is an important cause of change in ASE [42]. The more positive learning experiences teachers bring to students, the higher their ASE and the more actively they are involved in learning [43]. When students are able to help their peers solve problems, they see themselves as someone their peers can rely on, they are more motivated to explore and learn more independently and they find it fun to share solutions to difficult problems with their peers, which leads to an increase in their ASE [44].

References

  1. Schaufeli, W.B.; Salanova, M.; González-Romá, V.; Bakker, A.B. The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. J. Happiness Stud. 2002, 3, 71–92.
  2. Carmona-Halty, M.; Salanova, M.; Llorens, S.; Schaufeli, W.B. Linking positive emotions and academic performance: The mediated role of academic psychological capital and academic engagement. Curr. Psychol. 2021, 40, 2938–2947.
  3. Kuh, G.D.; Cruce, T.M.; Shoup, R.; Kinzie, J.; Gonyea, R.M. Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. J. High. Educ. 2008, 79, 540–563.
  4. García-Martínez, I.; Landa, J.M.A.; León, S.P. The mediating role of engagement on the achievement and quality of life of university students. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 6586.
  5. Tinto, V. Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Rev. Educ. Res. 1975, 45, 89–125.
  6. Truta, C.; Parv, L.; Topala, I. Academic engagement and intention to drop out: Levers for sustainability in higher education. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4637.
  7. Datu, J.A.D.; Park, N. Perceived school kindness and academic engagement: The mediational roles of achievement goal orientations. Sch. Psychol. Int. 2019, 40, 456–473.
  8. Miller, A.L.; Fassett, K.T.; Palmer, D.L. Achievement goal orientation: A predictor of student engagement in higher education. Motiv. Emot. 2021, 45, 327–344.
  9. Hobfoll, S.E. Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. Am. Psychol. 1989, 44, 513–524.
  10. Bakker, A.; Demerouti, E.; Schaufeli, W. Dual processes at work in a call centre: An application of the job demands–resources model. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 2003, 12, 393–417.
  11. Boekaerts, M.; Niemivirta, M. Self-regulated learning: Finding a balance between learning goals and ego-protective goals. In Handbook of Self-Regulation; Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P.R., Zeidner, M., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2000; pp. 417–450.
  12. Pintrich, P.R. An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 2000, 25, 92–104.
  13. Sideridis, G.D. Goal orientation, academic achievement, and depression: Evidence in favor of a revised goal theory framework. J. Educ. Psychol. 2005, 97, 366–375.
  14. Elliot, A.J.; McGregor, H.A. A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2001, 80, 501–519.
  15. Greene, B.A.; Miller, R.B. Influences on achievement: Goals, perceived ability, and cognitive engagement. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 1996, 21, 181–192.
  16. Senko, C.; Hama, H.; Belmonte, K. Achievement goals, study strategies, and achievement: A test of the “learning agenda” framework. Learn. Individ. Differ. 2013, 24, 1–10.
  17. Elliot, A.J. Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educ. Psychol. 1999, 34, 169–189.
  18. Ames, C. Achievement attributions and self-instructions under competitive and individualistic goal structures. J. Educ. Psychol. 1984, 76, 478–487.
  19. Ames, C.; Archer, J. Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. J. Educ. Psychol. 1988, 80, 260–267.
  20. Hsieh, P.; Sullivan, J.R.; Guerra, N.S. A closer look at college students: Self-efficacy and goal orientation. J. Adv. Acad. 2007, 18, 454–476.
  21. Mädamürk, K.; Tuominen, H.; Hietajärvi, L.; Salmela-Aro, K. Adolescent students’ digital engagement and achievement goal orientation profiles. Comput. Educ. 2021, 161, 104058.
  22. Tschannen-Moran, M.; Parish, J.; Dipaola, M. School climate: The interplay between interpersonal relationships and student achievement. J. Sch. Leadersh. 2006, 16, 386–415.
  23. Kalina, C.; Powell, K.C. Cognitive and social constructivism: Developing tools for an effective classroom. Education 2009, 130, 241–250. Available online: https://docdrop.org/static/drop-pdf/Powell-and-Kalina-U6g4p.pdf (accessed on 18 April 2022).
  24. Sakız, H. Impact of an inclusive programme on achievement, attendance and perceptions towards the school climate and social-emotional adaptation among students with disabilities. Educ. Psychol. 2017, 37, 611–631.
  25. Cohen, J.; McCabe, E.M.; Michelli, N.M.; Pickeral, T. School climate: Research, policy, practice, and teacher education. Teach. Coll. Rec. 2009, 111, 180–213.
  26. Fatou, N.; Kubiszewski, V. Are perceived school climate dimensions predictive of students’ engagement? Soc. Psychol. Educ. 2018, 21, 427–446.
  27. Mateos, N.E.; Fernández-Zabala, A.; Palacios, E.G.; Diaz-de-Cerio, I.I.-D.-L.-F. School climate and perceived academic performance: Direct or resilience-mediated relationship? Sustainability 2021, 13, 68.
  28. Ames, C. Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. J. Educ. Psychol. 1992, 84, 261–271.
  29. Tapola, A.; Niemivirta, M. The role of achievement goal orientations in students’ perceptions of and preferences for classroom environment. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 2008, 78, 291–312.
  30. Storlie, C.A.; Toomey, R.B. Facets of career development in a new immigrant destination: Exploring the associations among school climate, belief in self, school engagement, and academic achievement. J. Career Dev. 2020, 47, 44–58.
  31. Del Toro, J.; Wang, M.T. Longitudinal inter-relations between school cultural socialization and school engagement: The mediating role of school climate. Learn. Instr. 2021, 75, 101482.
  32. Sins, P.H.; Van Joolingen, W.R.; Savelsbergh, E.R.; van Hout-Wolters, B. Motivation and performance within a collaborative computer-based modeling task: Relations between students’ achievement goal orientation, self-efficacy, cognitive processing, and achievement. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 2008, 33, 58–77.
  33. Bandura, A. The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 1986, 4, 359–373.
  34. Kudusheva, N.; Amanova, I.; Abisheva, E.; Sabirova, Z.; Beisenova, Z. The development of individual self-efficiency among university students. Cypriot J. Educ. Sci. 2022, 17, 615–625.
  35. Lin, T.J. Multi-dimensional explorations into the relationships between high school students’ science learning self-efficacy and engagement. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2021, 43, 1193–1207.
  36. Schunk, D.H. Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning. Educ. Psychol. 1990, 25, 71–86.
  37. Chyung, S.Y.; Moll, A.J.; Berg, S.A. The role of intrinsic goal orientation, self-efficacy, and e-learning practice in engineering education. J. Eff. Teach. 2010, 10, 22–37. Available online: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1092160 (accessed on 14 April 2022).
  38. Hood, S.; Barrickman, N.; Djerdjian, N.; Farr, M.; Magner, S.; Roychowdhury, H.; Gerrits, R.; Lawford, H.; Ott, B.; Ross, K.; et al. “I like and prefer to work alone”: Social anxiety, academic self-efficacy, and students’ perceptions of active learning. CBE—Life Sci. Educ. 2021, 20, ar12.
  39. Lorsbach, A.; Jinks, J. Self-efficacy theory and learning environment research. Learn. Environ. Res. 1999, 2, 157–167.
  40. Loukas, A. What is school climate. Leadersh. Compass 2007, 5, 1–3. Available online: https://www.naesp.org/sites/default/files/resources/2/Leadership_Compass/2007/LC2007v5n1a4.pdf (accessed on 18 April 2022).
  41. Abd-Elmotaleb, M.; Saha, S.K. The role of academic self-efficacy as a mediator variable between perceived academic climate and academic performance. J. Educ. Learn. 2013, 2, 117–129.
  42. Li, Y.; Singh, C. Effect of gender, self-efficacy, and interest on perception of the learning environment and outcomes in calculus-based introductory physics courses. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 2021, 17, 010143.
  43. Gutiérrez, M.; Tomás, J.M. The role of perceived autonomy support in predicting university students’ academic success mediated by academic self-efficacy and school engagement. Educ. Psychol. 2019, 39, 729–748.
  44. de Vera, J.V.; Peteros, E.D.; Peconcillo, L.B., Jr.; Alcantara, G.A.; Villarin, E.R.; Fulgencio, M.D. Assessing differences on students’ attributes in mathematics based on their learning sessions. Open J. Soc. Sci. 2022, 10, 170–185.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback