References

1. Adhikari, P.B.; Liu, X.; Wu, X.; Zhu, S.; Kasahara, R.D. Fertilization in flowering plants: An odyssey of sperm cell delivery. Plant Mol. Biol. 2020, 103, 9–32.
2. Hartmann, H.T.; Kester, D.E.; Davies, F.T., Jr. Plant Propagation. Principles and Practices, 8th ed.; Pearson Education Limited: Edinburgh Gate, Harlow, UK, 2014.
3. Mudge, K.; Janick, J.; Scofield, S.; Goldschmidt, E.E. A history of grafting. In Horticultural Reviews; 2009; pp. 437–493.
4. Maiti, R.; Rodríguez, H.G.; Ac, P.; Kumari, C.A.; Sarkar, N.C. A comparative wood anatomy of 15 woody species in north-eastern mexico. For. Res. 2016, 5, 166.
5. Herrero, J. Studies of compatible and incompatible graft combinations with special reference to hardy fruit trees. J. Hortic. Sci. 1951, 26, 186–237.
6. Zarrouk, O.; Gogorcena, Y.; Moreno, M.Á.; Pinochet, J. Graft compatibility between peach cultivars and Prunus rootstocks. Hortscience 2006, 41, 1389–1394.
7. Moing, A.; Carde, J.-P. Growth, cambial activity and phloem structure in compatible and incompatible peach/plum grafts. Tree Physiol. 1988, 4, 347–359.
8. Moing, A.; Salesses, G.; Saglio, P.H. Growth and the composition and transport of carbohydrate in compatible and incom-patible peach/plum grafts. Tree Physiol. 1987, 3, 345–354.
9. Zarrouk, O.; Testillano, P.S.; Risueño, M.D.C.; Moreno, M.Á.; Gogorcena, Y. Changes in cell/tissue organization and peroxi-dase activity as markers for early detection of graft incompatibility in peach/plum combinations. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2010, 135, 9–17.
10. Rasool, A.; Mansoor, S.; Bhat, K.M.; Hassan, G.I.; Baba, T.R.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Alsahli, A.A.; El-Serehy, H.A.; Paray, B.A.; Ah-mad, P. Mechanisms underlying graft union formation and rootstock scion interaction in horticultural plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 590847.
11. Errea, P. Implications of phenolic compounds in graft incompatibility in fruit tree species. Sci. Hortic. 1998, 74, 195–205.
12. Loupit, G.; Cookson, S.J. Identifying molecular markers of successful graft union formation and compatibility. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11.
13. Čolić, S.; Fotirić-Akšić, M.; Rakonjac, V.; Nikolić, D. Predicting delayed graft incompatibility in sweet cherry by peroxidase isoenzyme analysis. Voćarstvo 2015, 49, 107–113.
14. Habibi, F.; Liu, T.; Folta, K.M.; Sarkhosh, A. Physiological, biochemical, and molecular aspects of grafting in fruit trees. Hor-tic. Res. 2022, 9.
15. Liu, Y. Darwin's pangenesis and graft hybridization. In Advances in Genetics, Kumar, D., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; Volume 102, pp. 27–66.
16. Tubbs, F.R. Growth relations of rootstock and scion in apples. J. Hortic. Sci. 1980, 55, 181–189.
17. Castle, W.S. A career perspective on citrus rootstocks, their development, and commercialization. HortScience 2010, 45, 11–15.
18. Iacono, F.; Peterlunger, E. Rootstock-scion interaction may affect drought tolerance in vitis vinifera cultivars. Implications in selection programs. Acta Hortic. 2000, 543–549.
19. Okudai, N.; Yoshinaga, K.; Takahara, T.; Ishiuchi, D.; Oiyama, I. Studies on the promotion of flowering and fruiting of juve-nile citrus seedlings. II: Effect of grafting. Bull. Fruit Tree Res. Stn. D 1980, 2, 15–28.
20. de Oliveira Castro, C.A.; dos Santos, G.A.; Takahashi, E.K.; Pires Nunes, A.C.; Souza, G.A.; de Resende, M.D.V. Accelerating Eucalyptus breeding strategies through top grafting applied to young seedlings. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2021, 171, 113906.
21. Cerruti, E.; Gisbert, C.; Drost, H.-G.; Valentino, D.; Portis, E.; Barchi, L.; Prohens, J.; Lanteri, S.; Comino, C.; Catoni, M. Grafting vigour is associated with DNA de-methylation in eggplant. Hortic. Res. 2021, 8, 241.
22. Huang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Jiang, X.; Yu, H.; Jia, H.; Tan, C.; Hu, G.; Hu, Y.; Rao, M.J.; Deng, X.; et al. Genome of a citrus rootstock and global DNA demethylation caused by heterografting. Hortic. Res. 2021, 8, 69.
23. Amos, J.; Hatton, R.G.; Hoblyn, T.N.; Knight, R.C. The effect of scion on root.: II. Stem-worked apples. J. Pomol. Hortic. Sci. 1930, 8, 248–258.
24. Tandonnet, J.P.; Cookson, S.J.; Vivin, P.; Ollat, N. Scion genotype controls biomass allocation and root development in grafted grapevine. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2010, 16, 290–300.
25. Gautier, A.T.; Merlin, I.; Doumas, P.; Cochetel, N.; Mollier, A.; Vivin, P.; Lauvergeat, V.; Péret, B.; Cookson, S.J. Identifying roles of the scion and the rootstock in regulating plant development and functioning under different phosphorus supplies in grapevine. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2021, 185, 104405.
26. Gautier, A.T.; Cochetel, N.; Merlin, I.; Hevin, C.; Lauvergeat, V.; Vivin, P.; Mollier, A.; Ollat, N.; Cookson, S.J. Scion genotypes exert long distance control over rootstock transcriptome responses to low phosphate in grafted grapevine. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 367.
27. Tandonnet, J.-P.; Marguerit, E.; Cookson, S.J.; Ollat, N. Genetic architecture of aerial and root traits in field-grown grafted grapevines is largely independent. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2018, 131, 903–915.
28. Gautier, A.T.; Chambaud, C.; Brocard, L.; Ollat, N.; Gambetta, G.A.; Delrot, S.; Cookson, S.J. Merging genotypes: Graft union formation and scion–rootstock interactions. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 70, 747–755.
29. Wooldridge, T.J.S. Cross-Compatibility, Graft-Compatibility, and Phylogenetic Relationships in the Aurantioideae: New Data from the Balsamocitrinae; University of California: Riverside, CA, USA, 2016.
30. Andrews, P.K.; Marquez, C.S. Graft incompatibility. Hortic. Rev. 1993, 15, 183–232.
31. Copes, D. Graft union formation in douglas-fir. Am. J. Bot. 1969, 56, 285–289.
32. Pina, A.; Errea, P. A review of new advances in mechanism of graft compatibility–incompatibility. Sci. Hortic. 2005, 106, 1–11.
33. Asante, A.K.; Barnett, J.R. Graft union formation in mango (Mangifera indica L.). J. Hortic. Sci. 1997, 72, 781–790.
34. Ermel, F.F.; Poëssel, J.L.; Faurobert, M.; Catesson, A.M. Early scion/stock junction in compatible and incompatible pear/pear and pear/quince grafts: A histo-cytological study. Ann. Bot. 1997, 79, 505–515.
35. Yeoman, M.M. Cellular recognition systems in grafting. In Cellular Interactions, Linskens, H.F., Heslop-Harrison, J., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1984; pp. 453–472.
36. Wulf, K.E.; Reid, J.B.; Foo, E. What drives interspecies graft union success? Exploring the role of phylogenetic relatedness and stem anatomy. Physiol. Plant. 2020, 170, 132–147.
37. Notaguchi, M.; Kurotani, K.-i.; Sato, Y.; Tabata, R.; Kawakatsu, Y.; Okayasu, K.; Sawai, Y.; Okada, R.; Asahina, M.; Ichihashi, Y.; et al. Cell-cell adhesion in plant grafting is facilitated by β-1,4-glucanases. Science 2020, 369, 698–702.
38. Santamour, F.S. Graft incompatibility related to cambial peroxidase isozymes in chinese chestnut. J. Environ. Hortic. 1988, 6, 33–39.
39. Gulen, H.; Arora, R.; Kuden, A.; Krebs, S.L.; Postman, J. Peroxidase isozyme profiles in compatible and incompatible pear-quince graft combinations. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2002, 127, 152–157.
40. Irisarri, P.; Binczycki, P.; Errea, P.; Martens, H.J.; Pina, A. Oxidative stress associated with rootstock–scion interactions in pear/quince combinations during early stages of graft development. J. Plant Physiol. 2015, 176, 25–35.
41. Marín, D.; Armengol, J.; Carbonell-Bejerano, P.; Escalona, J.M.; Gramaje, D.; Hernández-Montes, E.; Intrigliolo, D.S.; Mar-tínez-Zapater, J.M.; Medrano, H.; Mirás-Avalos, J.M.; et al. Challenges of viticulture adaptation to global change: Tackling the issue from the roots. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2021, 27, 8–25.
42. Waite, H.; Armengol, J.; Billones-Baaijens, R.; Gramaje, D.; Hallen, F.; Marco, S.D.; Smart, R. A protocol for the management of grapevine rootstock mother vines to reduce latent infections by grapevine trunk pathogens in cuttings. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2018, 57, 384–398.
43. Swarbrick, T. The healing of wounds in woody stems. J. Pomol. Hortic. Sci. 1925, 5, 98–114.
44. Levy, A.; Epel, B.L. Chapter 4.4.2—cytology of the (1-3)-β-glucan (callose) in plasmodesmata and sieve plate pores. In Chem-istry, Biochemistry, and Biology of 1-3 Beta Glucans and Related Polysaccharides, Bacic, A., Fincher, G.B., Stone, B.A., Eds.; Ac-ademic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2009; pp. 439–463.
45. Denaxa, N.-K.; Vemmos, S.N.; Roussos, P.A. Shoot girdling improves rooting performance of kalamata olive cuttings by up-regulating carbohydrates, polyamines and phenolic compounds. Agriculture 2021, 11, 71.
46. Basak, U.C.; Das, A.B.; Das, P. Rooting response in stem cuttings from five species of mangrove trees: Effect of auxins and en-zyme activities. Mar. Biol. 2000, 136, 185–189.
47. Howard, B.H. Manipulating rooting potential in stockplants before collecting cuttings. In Biology of Adventitious Root For-mation, Davis, T.D., Haissig, B.E., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1994; pp. 123–142.
48. Aloni, B.; Karni, L.; Deventurero, G.; Levin, Z.; Cohen, R.; Katzir, N.; Lotan-Pompan, M.; Edelstein, M.; Aktas, H.; Turhan, E.; et al. Physiological and biochemical changes at the rootstock-scion interface in graft combinations between Cucurbita root-stocks and a melon scion. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2008, 83, 777–783.
49. Barbier, F.F.; Dun, E.A.; Beveridge, C.A. Apical dominance. Curr. Biol. 2017, 27, R864–R865.
50. Sanbagavalli, S.; Bhavana, J.; Pavithra, S. Nipping—A simple strategy to boost the yield—Review. Ann. Res. Rev. Biol. 2020, 35, 45–51.
51. Jeffree, C.E.; Yeoman, M.M. Development of intercellular connections between opposing cells in a graft union. New Phytol. 1983, 93, 491–509.
52. Moore, R.; Walker, D.B. Studies of vegetative compatibility-incompatibility in higher plants. I. A structural study of a com-patible autograft in Sedum telephoides (crassulaceae). Am. J. Bot. 1981, 68, 820–830.
53. Trinchera, A.; Pandozy, G.; Rinaldi, S.; Crinò, P.; Temperini, O.; Rea, E. Graft union formation in artichoke grafting onto wild and cultivated cardoon: An anatomical study. J. Plant Physiol. 2013, 170, 1569–1578.
54. Asante, A. Compatibility studies on cashew-mango graft combinations. Ghana J. Agric. Sci. 2001, 34, 3–9.
55. Moore, R.; Walker, D.B. Studies of vegetative compatibility-incompatibility in higher plants. II. A structural study of an in-compatible heterograft between Sedum telephoides (crassulaceae) and Solanum pennellii (solanaceae). Am. J. Bot. 1981, 68, 831–842.
56. Cookson, S.J.; Clemente Moreno, M.J.; Hevin, C.; Nyamba Mendome, L.Z.; Delrot, S.; Trossat-Magnin, C.; Ollat, N. Graft union formation in grapevine induces transcriptional changes related to cell wall modification, wounding, hormone signalling, and secondary metabolism. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 2997–3008.
57. Zhang, A.; Matsuoka, K.; Kareem, A.; Robert, M.; Roszak, P.; Blob, B.; Bisht, A.; De Veylder, L.; Voiniciuc, C.; Asahina, M.; et al. Cell-wall damage activates DOF transcription factors to promote wound healing and tissue regeneration in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr. Biol. 2022, 32, 1883–1894.
58. Savatin, D.V.; Gramegna, G.; Modesti, V.; Cervone, F. Wounding in the plant tissue: The defense of a dangerous passage. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 470.
59. Daher, F.B.; Braybrook, S.A. How to let go: Pectin and plant cell adhesion. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 523.
60. Atakhani, A.; Bogdziewiez, L.; Verger, S. Characterising the mechanics of cell–cell adhesion in plants. Quant. Plant Biol. 2022, 3, E2.
61. Kollmann, R.; Glockmann, C. Studies on graft unions. I. Plasmodesmata between cells of plants belonging to different unre-lated taxa. Protoplasma 1985, 124, 224–235.
62. Pina, A.; Errea, P. Cellular viability and pectin localisation in apricot (P. armeniaca)/plum combinations related to graft re-sponse. In XIII International Symposium on Apricot Breeding and Culture 717; 2006; pp. 185–188.
63. Pina, A.; Errea, P.; Martens, H.J. Graft union formation and cell-to-cell communication via plasmodesmata in compatible and incompatible stem unions of Prunus spp. Sci. Hortic. 2012, 143, 144–150.
64. Wang, J.; Li, D.; Chen, N.; Chen, J.; Mu, C.; Yin, K.; He, Y.; Liu, H. Plant grafting relieves asymmetry of jasmonic acid response induced by wounding between scion and rootstock in tomato hypocotyl. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0241317.
65. Bao, W.-W.; Zhang, X.-C.; Zhang, A.L.; Zhao, L.; Wang, Q.-C.; Liu, Z.-D. Validation of micrografting to analyze compatibility, shoot growth, and root formation in micrografts of kiwifruit (Actinidia spp.). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2020, 140, 209–214.
66. Errea, P.; Felipe, A.; Herrero, M. Graft establishment between compatible and incompatible Prunus spp. J. Exp. Bot. 1994, 45, 393–401.
67. Melnyk, C.W.; Schuster, C.; Leyser, O.; Meyerowitz, E.M. A developmental framework for graft formation and vascular re-connection in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr. Biol. 2015, 25, 1306–1318.
68. Wagner, D. Ultrastructure of the bud graft union in Malus. Ph.D. Thesis, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA, 1968.
69. Melnyk, C.W.; Gabel, A.; Hardcastle, T.J.; Robinson, S.; Miyashima, S.; Grosse, I.; Meyerowitz, E.M. Transcriptome dynamics at Arabidopsis graft junctions reveal an intertissue recognition mechanism that activates vascular regeneration. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E2447–E2456.
70. Hall, P.; Badenoch-Jones, J.; Parker, C.; Letham, D.; Barlow, B. Identification and quantification of cytokinins in the xylem sap of mistletoes and their hosts in relation to leaf mimicry. Funct. Plant Biol. 1987, 14, 429–438.
71. Bogoeva, V.; Ivanov, I.; Kulina, H.; Russev, G.; Atanasova, L. A novel cytokinin-binding property of mistletoe lectin I from Viscum album. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2013, 27, 3583–3585.
72. Zhang, X.; Teixeira da Silva, J.A.; Duan, J.; Deng, R.; Xu, X.; Ma, G. Endogenous hormone levels and anatomical characters of haustoria in Santalum album L. seedlings before and after attachment to the host. J. Plant Physiol. 2012, 169, 859–866.
73. Moore, R. A model for graft compatibility-incompatibility in higher plants. Am. J. Bot. 1984, 71, 752–758.
74. Santamour, F.S. Graft compatibility in woody plants: An expanded perspective. J. Environ. Hortic. 1988, 6, 27–32.
75. Morris, H.; Hietala, A.M.; Jansen, S.; Ribera, J.; Rosner, S.; Salmeia, K.A.; Schwarze, F.W.M.R. Using the CODIT model to ex-plain secondary metabolites of xylem in defence systems of temperate trees against decay fungi. Ann. Bot. 2019, 125, 701–720.
76. Nanda, A.K.; Melnyk, C.W. The role of plant hormones during grafting. J. Plant Res. 2018, 131, 49–58.
77. Qureshi, M.A.; Jaskani, M.J.; Khan, A.S.; Ahmad, R. Influence of endogenous plant hormones on physiological and growth attributes of kinnow mandarin grafted on nine rootstocks. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2022, 41, 1254–1264.
78. Tworkoski, T.; Fazio, G. Physiological and morphological effects of size-controlling rootstocks on 'Fuji' apple scions. Acta Hortic. 2011, 903, 865–872.
79. Kamboj, J.S.; Browning, G.; Blake, P.S.; Quinlan, J.D.; Baker, D.A. GC-MS-SIM analysis of abscisic acid and indole-3-acetic acid in shoot bark of apple rootstocks. Plant Growth Regul. 1999, 28, 21–27.
80. Kumari, A.; Kumar, J.; Kumar, A.; Chaudhury, A.; Singh, S.P. Grafting triggers differential responses between scion and root-stock. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0124438–e0124438.
81. He, W.; Xie, R.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Q.; Wang, H.; Yang, S.; Luo, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Tang, H.; Gmitter, F.G., Jr.; et al. Comparative tran-scriptomic analysis on compatible/incompatible grafts in Citrus. Hortic. Res. 2022, 9.
82. Dhakar, M.K.; Das, B. Standardization of grafting technique in litchi. Indian J. Hortic 2017, 74, 16–19.
83. Smith, D.D.; Sperry, J.S. Coordination between water transport capacity, biomass growth, metabolic scaling and species stature in co-occurring shrub and tree species. Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 37, 2679–2690.
84. Eleftheriou, E.P. A decline-like disorder of pear in Greece: Pear decline or scion—Rootstock incompatibility? Sci. Hortic. 1985, 27, 241–250.
85. Gebhardt, K.; Feucht, W. Polyphenol changes at the union of Prunus avium/Prunus cerasus grafts. J. Hortic. Sci. 1982, 57, 253–258.
86. Guclu, S.F. Identification of polyphenols in homogenetic and heterogenetic combination of cherry grafting. Pak. J. Bot. 2019, 51, 2067–2072.
87. Errea, P.; Garay, L.; Marín, J.A. Early detection of graft incompatibility in apricot (Prunus armeniaca) using in vitro tech-niques. Physiol. Plant. 2001, 112, 135–141.
88. Ermel, F.F.; Kervella, J.; Catesson, A.M.; Poëssel, J.L. Localized graft incompatibility in pear/quince (Pyrus communis/Cydonia oblonga) combinations: Multivariate analysis of histological data from 5-month-old grafts. Tree Physiol. 1999, 19, 645–654.
89. Schmid, P.P.S.; Feucht, W. Compatibility in Prunus avium/Prunus cerasus graftings during the initial phase. III. Isoelectro-focusing of proteins, peroxidases and acid phosphatases during union formation. J. Hortic. Sci. 1985, 60, 311–318.
90. Deloire, A.; xc; Bant, C. Peroxidase activity and lignification at the interface between stock and scion of compatible and in-compatible grafts of Capsicum on Lycopersicum. Ann. Bot. 1982, 49, 887–891.
91. Bruce, R.J.; West, C.A. Elicitation of lignin biosynthesis and isoperoxidase activity by pectic fragments in suspension cultures of castor bean. Plant Physiol. 1989, 91, 889–897.
92. Baron, D.; Esteves Amaro, A.C.; Pina, A.; Ferreira, G. An overview of grafting re-establishment in woody fruit species. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 243, 84–91.
93. Dunand, C.; De Meyer, M.; Crèvecoeur, M.; Penel, C. Expression of a peroxidase gene in zucchini in relation with hypocotyl growth. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2003, 41, 805–811.
94. Sasaki, S.; Baba, K.i.; Nishida, T.; Tsutsumi, Y.; Kondo, R. The cationic cell-wall-peroxidase having oxidation ability for polymeric substrate participates in the late stage of lignification of Populus alba L. Plant Mol. Biol. 2006, 62, 797–807.
95. Reimers, P.J.; Guo, A.; Leach, J.E. Increased activity of a cationic peroxidase associated with an incompatible interaction be-tween Xanthomonas oryzae pv oryzae and rice (Oryza sativa). Plant Physiol. 1992, 99, 1044–1050.
96. Milinović, B.; Dragović-Uzelac, V.; Kazija, D.H.; Jelačić, T.; Vujević, P.; Čiček, D.; Biško, A.; Čmelik, Z. Influence of four differ-ent dwarfing rootstocks on phenolic acids and anthocyanin composition of sweet cherry ( Prunus avium L) cvs ‘Kordia’ and ‘Regina’. J. Appl. Bot Food Qual. 2016, 89, 29–37.
97. Mng’omba, S.A.; du Toit, E.S.; Akinnifesi, F.K. The relationship between graft incompatibility and phenols in Uapaca kirk-iana Müell Arg. Sci. Hortic. 2008, 117, 212–218.
98. Gamba, G.; Cisse, V.; Donno, D.; Razafindrakoto, Z.R.; Beccaro, G.L. Quali-quantitative study on phenol compounds as early predictive markers of graft incompatibility: A case study on chestnut (Castanea spp.). Horticulturae 2022, 8, 32.
99. Treutter, D.; Feucht, W. Accumulation of the flavonoid prunin in Prunus avium/P. cerasus grafts and its possible involvement in the process of incompatibility. Acta Hortic. 1988, 227, 74–78.
100. Lochard, R.G.; Schneider, G.W. Stock and scion growth relationships and the dwarfing mechanism in apple. In Horticultural Reviews, Janick, J., Ed.; AVI Publishing Company, Inc.: Westport, CT, USA, 1981; Volume 3, pp. 315–375.
101. Zanardo, D.I.L.; Lima, R.B.; Ferrarese, M.d.L.L.; Bubna, G.A.; Ferrarese-Filho, O. Soybean root growth inhibition and lignifi-cation induced by p-coumaric acid. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2009, 66, 25–30.
102. Kamisaka, S.; Takeda, S.; Takahashi, K.; Shibata, K. Diferulic and ferulic acid in the cell wall of Avena coleoptiles—Their relationships to mechanical properties of the cell wall. Physiol. Plant. 1990, 78, 1–7.
103. Tan, K.-S.; Hoson, T.; Masuda, Y.; Kamisaka, S. Correlation between cell wall extensibility and the content of diferulic and ferulic acids in cell walls of Oryza sativa coleoptiles grown under water and in air. Physiol. Plant. 1991, 83, 397–403.