Renal Hypoxia: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Jason Zhu and Version 1 by Mariadelina Simeoni.

Ischemic nephropathy consists of progressive renal function loss due to renal hypoxia, inflammation, microvascular rarefaction, and fibrosis. Research reports that: 1. endovascular reperfusion is the gold-standard therapy for RAS, but its success mostly depends on treatment timeliness and a preserved downstream vascular bed; 2. anti-RAAS drugs, SGLT2 inhibitors, and/or anti-endothelin agents are especially recommended for patients with renal ischemia who are not eligible for endovascular reperfusion for slowing renal damage progression; 3. TGF-β, MCP-1, VEGF, and NGAL assays, along with BOLD MRI, should be extended in clinical practice and applied to a pre- and post-revascularization protocols; 4. MSC infusion appears effective in renal regeneration and could represent a revolutionary treatment for patients with fibrotic evolution of renal ischemia.

  • ischemic nephropathy
  • renal hypoxia
  • renal artery stenosis
  • renal tissue oxygenation
  • chronic kidney disease

1. Introduction

In most renal diseases, tissue hypoxia is associated with vascular damage, the so-named nephroangiosclerosis (NAS) [6,11,12][1][2][3]. The correlation between reduced renal blood flow (RBF) and parenchymal oxidative and inflammatory damage in renal atherosclerosis is still poorly understood. Some authors suggest hypoxia as the trigger of a “common pathway” leading to renal fibrosis substitution after tubulo-glomerular damage [2,5][4][5]. This depends on the enhanced oxygen consumption by the kidney with the adaptative increase in RBF. As opposed to other organs where the increase in blood flow is followed by a reduction of the hypoxic state, the kidney has the ability to overcome hypoperfusion, but at the high cost of oxidative stress [13][6]. Several factors (basal cell oxygen consumption, nitric oxide, angiotensin II, etc.) are involved, and they trigger important intracellular pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic cascades that are at the basis of renal damage progression [13,14][6][7].
NAS is characterized by chronic hypoxia that contributes to both tubulointerstitial fibrosis and glomerulosclerosis [15][8]. Neusser et al., aimed to analyze the genome-wide expression data from micro dissected glomeruli to evaluate the role of hypoxia in NAS glomerulosclerosis. They found a great number of genes whose expressions are regulated by hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs). This evidence appears quite interesting in relation to the shared histological features observed in glomerular sections of NAS patients. In particular, the immune–histological analysis evidenced that chemokine C-X-C motif receptor 4 (CXCR4) and 12 (CXCR12) have pivotal roles in induced hypoxia, leading to both tubulointerstitial fibrosis and glomerulosclerosis in NAS [16][9].
It is well-known that hypoxia is a landmark common to all cardiovascular diseases (hypertension, arterial aneurysms, atherosclerosis, pulmonary arterial hypertension, congestive heart failure, etc.), and HIFs are involved in many mechanisms such as erythropoiesis, angiogenesis, and inflammation [17][10]. Any therapeutic approach addressed at stabilizing HIF activity might have a potential benefit in ischemic nephropathy, especially in patients with NAS; however, this important question has not been addressed and/or demonstrated in any trial so far.
Sami Palomäki et al., reported an upregulation of HIF-1α in MSCs [18][11]. This could explain how the increase in intrarenal HIF-1α may stimulate angiogenesis and increase blood flow, as reported by Jennifer E Ziello et al. [19][12]. Many genes not only involved in angiogenesis but also in inflammation, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2), cathepsin D (CATHD), keratin (KRT), and tumor growth factor-β (TGF-β), are targets of the HIF-1 transcription complex, a controversial factor in hypoxic renal damage progression. Jiacheng Sun et al., tested the proangiogenic activity of exosomes obtained from HIF-1α-modified MSCs in myocardial infarction. They demonstrated the relevant capacity of these MSC-derived exosomes in angiogenesis, confirming the therapeutic potential of these engineered cells [20][13]. The novel drug class of HIF stabilizers recently approved for the treatment of secondary anemia in CKD patients should be investigated for possible pleiotropic effects on all inflammation, angiogenesis, and MSC activity.
Transition to CKD in revascularized patients with renal artery stenosis (RAS) depends on the coexistence of extensive intrarenal NAS with reduced microvascular density [2][4]. According to the chronic hypoxia hypothesis, the loss of glomeruli also induces hypoperfusion of peritubular capillaries leading to tubular damage and vascular rarefaction. Diffuse intrarenal atherosclerosis is the main feature of a condition called atherosclerotic renovascular disease (ARVD), in which endovascular revascularizing procedures would not be indicated and are associated with worse outcomes. In ARVD, inflammation and fibrosis are especially evident and explain the typical and untreatable evolution to CKD [12][3].
As reported by several authors, in ischemic nephropathy, the rarefaction of the vascular bed is always present, but with variable severity. In fact, a stable 30–40% reduction in renal blood flow (RBF) is associated with unchanged intrarenal oxygenation after PTRA [5,7][5][14]. This partly depends on compensation due to altered shunting. Moreover, a lower RBF leads to GFR decline with diminished renal oxygen consumption, and the kidney varies the state of oxygenation between the cortex and the medulla [21][15].
As the reduction in RBF increases, the transition from a purely hemodynamic phase to an inflammatory one begins, since the reduction in renal oxygenation will activate the proinflammatory and fibrotic pathways, which could be reversed if renal ischemia is promptly treated [22,23,24][16][17][18]. In agreement with relevant studies, inflammation plays a key role in the transition from acute kidney injury (AKI) to CKD in ischemic nephropathy [25,26,27][19][20][21]. In hypoxic renal tissue, macrophagic infiltrates and damaged tubular cells release several inflammatory and profibrotic cytokines and chemokines such as TGF-β, VEGF, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) [27,28][21][22]. TGF-β is one of the major actors, since it induces myofibroblast proliferation, which leads to the inhibition of both proteinases production and matrix degradation [29][23]. Several reports indicate that most inflammation mediators in ischemic nephropathy are induced through the activation of renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS), whose up-regulation is aimed at compensating hypoperfusion and is mostly accompanied by hypertension and proteinuria [30,31,32][24][25][26]. This underlines the importance of the use of anti-RAAS agents in ischemic patients not eligible for revascularization [3,33][27][28].

2. How to Evaluate and Quantify the Hypoxic State and Inflammatory Cell Activity

Several methods to measure intrarenal oxygen tension are available. In studies conducted on animals, the use of polarographic oxygen microelectrodes has provided most of the current information on kidney oxygenation [34,35,36][29][30][31]; however, anesthetic agents used during experiments could impair the quality of results [37,38][32][33]. In this regard, at least three solutions have been proposed: (1) the use of implantable microelectrodes in combination with telemetry devices [39][34]; (2) the use of fluorescence optodes [39][34]; and (3) the use of total intravenous instead of volatile anesthesia [37][32]. All of these methods have been tested by the Evans group over the last three decades in different experimental settings. In the comparison of microelectrodes and fluorescence, it appeared that both presented some limitations, and their abilities regarding the assessment of renal oxygenation were not perfect. The Evans group, in a recent review, asserted that the real renal oxygenation level comprised those detected using the two techniques. Total intravenous anesthesia, instead, failed to provide stabilization of intrarenal oxygenation in sheep undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass but seemed more effective than volatile anesthesia outside of such invasive surgery [37][32].
In vivo and in vitro studies have demonstrated an increase in cellular levels of HIFs in ischemic nephropathy [40][35]. HIF-1α and HIF-2α are two oxygen-sensitive transcription factors acting as mediators of the cellular adaptive response to hypoxia. Consequently, the evidence of an intracellular accumulation of HIFs and an increase in the expression of HIF target genes could be interpreted as evidence of renal tissue hypoxia [41][36].
Blood NGAL has been proposed as a biomarker of renal ischemia, and it is a reliable and early biomarker of AKI [42,43][37][38]. Textor et al., reported that NGAL levels are inversely correlated with eGFR in patients with ischemic nephropathy [44][39].
The functional assessment of renal tissue oxygenation in humans was possible only after the introduction of blood oxygen level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging (BOLD-MRI) [12,45][3][40]. This technique allows for the study of renal oxygenation status in relation to the degree of mild (G1), moderate (G2), and severe (G3) RAS. BOLD-MRI sensitivity and specificity in the identification of renal ischemia are related to the paramagnetic quality of deoxygenated hemoglobin, which modifies magnetic realignment after a field interruption, as opposed to to oxygenated hemoglobin, which has no active magnetic component [45,46][40][41]. As for vascular rarefaction, it might be due to the partial volume effect that also leads to a lower amount of deoxyhemoglobin per pixel with possible inaccuracy of its detection using BOLD-MRI.

3. Role of Mesenchymal and Resident Renal Stem Cells in Kidney Inflammation and Repair

Several renal damage mechanisms share common ground in kidney ischemic insult and lead to fibrosis and renal function loss [47][42]. Considering the high economic and social costs of renal replacement therapies, this represents a major health problem worldwide [48][43]. Similar to the nervous system and the heart, the kidneys do not appear to be able to effectively repair themselves after acute or chronic damage. Many reports on stem cells in the last two decades have opened up a novel and hopeful prospect, that of the renal regeneration [2,5,7,49][4][5][14][44].
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are fibroblast-like stromal cells that have been isolated first from the bone marrow and successively from several other organs and tissues, including the kidney [50,51,52][45][46][47]. Many recent studies have focused on the exploration of their therapeutic potential in different renal damage conditions. MSCs ability to migrate and/or differentiate in the kidney following several renal insulting mechanisms defines the extraordinary repairing potentiality of these peculiar cells. Once migrated or activated in the damaged kidney, MSCs produce and release, through extracellular vesicles and exosomes, a variety of cytokines and chemokines able to reduce inflammation and increase different reparative pathways. Paracrine and/or endocrine mechanisms are involved, with effects on both immune response modulation and cellular replacement [53,54][48][49].
In mammalian kidneys, unlike those of cartilaginous fish, MSC proliferation and differentiation ceases after birth [55][50]. As a consequence, the response of mammalian kidneys to irreversible renal mass loss following a partial or total nephrectomy consists of compensatory hypertrophy of the adjacent nephrons or of the contralateral kidney, respectively [56,57][51][52]. Conversely, in the case of AKI, the adult kidney has some ability to repair and remodel, which can ultimately lead to restoration of renal structure and function [58][53]. Looking to renal ischemia in all its variants (RAS, RAS+NAS, and ARVD) leading to both tubular epithelial cell and podocyte death [3[27][54],8], it is known that the damaged tubule will undergo repair over a period of 8–12 weeks, which is most likely mediated by special cells previously classified as survivor epithelial cells. These are expressed close to the damaged renal tissue and correspond to RSCs [59,60][55][56]. These cells are thought to be MSCs renally committed, migrated, and differentiated to RSCs at the site of tissue damage in response to different stimuli. It has been reported, in fact, that MSCs express several cytokine and chemokine receptors that may be functional during migration to the sites of inflammation [61,62][57][58]. In addition, it has been reported that in the course of ischemia, HIF-1α is able to protect MSCs against oxygen–glucose deprivation-induced injury through both the induction of autophagy and the activation of the intracellular PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling cascade [63][59]. Under hypoxic insult, the expression of stromal cell-derived chemokine factor 1 (SDF-1) has been found to be upregulated within the kidney [64][60]. The finding of SDF-1 receptor (CXCR4) expression on MSCs is a further demonstration of the chemiotactic activity elicited by hypoxia on MSCs, with a protective and reparative aim [65][61]. It has been reported, in support of this, that the pre-incubation of MSCs with TNF-α is followed by increased MSC migratory capacity. This indicates that the SDF-1/CXCR4 interaction may mediate the localization of exogenously injected MSCs to hypoxically damaged renal tissue with potential therapeutic effect [66,67][62][63].
The mechanisms preserving the integrity of MSCs and addressing their migration to damaged tissue increase the hope for future successful use of these cells in the treatment of renal ischemia, even in the case of extensive intrarenal vascular-bed compromise and fibrosis onset.
Resident RSCs have been found in the parietal epithelium of the Bowman capsule at the urinary pole of the glomerulus in association with different kidney insults [68,69,70][64][65][66]. Their identification and localization were based on studies of RSCs’ specific surface antigenic expression. Specifically, the finding of CD24, CD133 [70[66][67],71], and podocalyxin expression [72][68] in some parietal cells of the glomerular capsule, next to the tubule origin in animal models of AKI, demonstrated the existence of RSCs and their ability not only to replace tubular cells but also to regenerate podocytes after injury [59,65][55][61]. Also, circulating RSCs showed the ability to repair kidneys after ischemia/reperfusion damage [8,30][24][54]. Several authors have also reported stem cell-dependent immunomodulation able to reduce the intrarenal inflammatory response invariably associated to any kidney insult [44,73,74,75][39][69][70][71]. The secretion of paracrine factors committed to inhibiting the release of interleukin-1α (IL-1α) and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and to increasing the secretion of the IL-1 receptor antagonist are reported mechanisms explaining the ability of differentiated MSCs to repair injured kidneys [76,77][72][73]. In addition, it has been demonstrated in rodents that these cells are able to secrete several growth factors with different biological effects ranging from angiogenesis to mitogenesis, cell proliferation, and apoptosis prevention [78,79,80,81,82,83,84][74][75][76][77][78][79][80]. Moreover, it has been reported that differentiated MSCs are also able to influence the activity of macrophages by enhancing their pivotal role in cell replacement and repair through the reduction of inflammation, the clearing of apoptotic cells and debris, and the promotion of tissue remodeling and regeneration [85,86][81][82]. Macrophage activation and function depend on the inflammatory stimuli received by the damaged tissue microenvironment. As the repair process progresses from the initial inflammatory phase to the remodeling phase, macrophages successively exhibit variable polarization and activation states [87][83].

4. Mesenchymal and Renal Stem Cell Use in Renal Ischemia

Inflammatory damage and fibrosis in the ischemic kidney play the main negative roles in PTRA failure. They are associated with worse outcomes since they induce renal damage irreversibility. Beyond revascularization, anti-RAAS agents and novel molecules such as SGLT2 inhibitors and anti-endothelin agents are most often recommended to prevent the fibrotic evolution of renal damage [88,89,90][84][85][86]. However, no clear evidence for renal tissue revitalization has been reported in association with the use of these drugs [7,91,92][14][87][88]. Regenerative therapies appear to be the most desirable and future solution to this major CKD cause. The prospect is that of a substantial change in outcomes using stem cells in ischemic CKD patients, with possible dialysis retardation or avoidance.
The presence of MSCs in different tissues, where they show the ability to differentiate into resident mature cells, continues throughout life; however, it has been reported that the number and the functionality of these cells can be influenced by age [93][89]. In embryos, the differentiation status of totipotent zygotic cells stops at the stage of pluripotent embryonic cells, which constitute the germ layer. After this phase, stem cells will reside in specific areas of several tissues, where they can move from quiescence to activation at any moment. They can respond to specific triggers with differentiation to mature cells with consequent tissue regeneration. This typically occurs in the concomitance of renal inflammation and fibroblast activation [94,95][90][91]. On the other hand, it has been reported that MSCs collected from patients with ARVD might exhibit impaired function, senescence, and DNA damage, possibly determined via epigenetic mechanisms.
In a recent review by Yanmeng Yang et al., the authors concluded that a hypoxic environment can positively influence different functions (proliferation, survival, homing, differentiation, and paracrine activities) of MSCs. As a consequence, the authors propose hypoxia preconditioning (HPC) of MSCs as an engineering approach that could potentially improve the therapeutic efficacy of these cells [96][92]. In fact, as described by Isik et al., in cultures of MSCs collected from pigs with RAS, HPC exerted beneficial effects on cell viability in terms of proliferation and differentiation [97][93]. Moreover, the downregulation of chromatin-modifying enzymes resulted in a reduction of MSC senescence and dysfunction. Therefore, the authors concluded that HPC of MSCs can be considered as a methodological optimization able to improve autologous cell therapy in patients with ischemic nephropathy [75][71]. In vivo experiments on rats with ischemia-reperfusion injuries treated with HPC MSCc versus non-preconditioned MSCs have demonstrated an enhanced ability to reduce profibrotic circulating factors and to induce VEGF-related angiogenesis in rats with ischemic nephropathy [98][94].
Some reports in animal models have explored the possible restorative role of MSCs after renal reperfusion and have shown encouraging and promising results [27,33][21][28]. One of these emerged in the preclinical studies conducted by Textor’s group [44][39]. Renal microcirculation reparation, inflammatory damage attenuation, and renal function restoration were the observed effects of MSC infusion. These benefits seemed to be mediated by paracrine effects linked to the release of soluble mediators and extracellular vesicles, and to the activation of pericytes.
In an interesting study on an RAS pig model, Chen XJ et al., also reported that low-energy shock wave (SW) therapy and the administration of fat-derived MSCs can stimulate both the repair of ischemic renal damage and the regeneration of renal vasculature. Specifically, researchers administered fat-derived MSCs directly into the renal artery to enhance SW therapeutic power and preserve the function and structure of the stenotic kidney, and they obtained these important signs of renal revitalization [99][95].
Xin Zhang et al., conducted similar experiments in twenty-two pigs with RAS that were treated with SW therapy and compared the effects of MSCs infusion to those observed in uninfused controls. Four weeks after treatment, individual RBF, GFR, and oxygenation were assessed in vivo, while renal microcirculation, fibrosis, and oxidative stress were studied ex vivo. Based on the results, the authors reported that the intraarterial infusion of MSCs enhanced the pro-angiogenic effect of SW treatment, which resulted in an improvement of both RBF and GFR. They concluded that SW therapy is fundamental for ameliorating renal microvascular aspects, but MSCs are necessary for rebuilding the vascular structure [100][96]. A recent study by the same group revealed the reasons for their previous results. They demonstrated, in fact, that low-energy SW treatment can promote the homing of endothelial cell progenitors to the stenotic kidney [101][97]. Translating this evidence to humans, Sune Moeller Skov-Jeppesen et al., recently tested the combination of SW therapy and fat-derived MSC administration in 14 patients with diabetes mellitus and Stage 3 CKD. All in-study patients showed a good tolerance to the treatment, although GFR and albuminuria did not significantly change in the follow-up. More studies in larger populations would be needed to achieve sufficiently high statistical power.
In different interesting studies conducted on animals by the Fan Yang group and others, fat-derived MSCs showed a marked reparative, anti-inflammatory, and anti-fibrotic ability in streptozotocin-induced diabetic nephropathy [102,103,104][98][99][100]. Abumoawad A et al., tried the same protocol in patients with ARVD through the administration of different doses of fat-derived autologous MSCs [7][14]. Specifically, thirty-nine subjects with ARVD were studied and selected for intraarterial infusion of MSCs. Of these, only twenty-one subjects were enrolled and divided into three groups with different MSC dose assignations: 1, 2.5, and 5.0 × 105 cells/kg, respectively. Six weeks prior to the scheduled MSC administration, approximately 2 g of subcutaneous abdominal fat was biopsied from each patient and frozen. Four to six days prior to infusion, MSCs were thawed and cultured, and subsequently infused into the renal artery. Only with the greater dose of MSC infusion (5.0 × 105 cells/kg) did patients show increased tissue oxygenation with blood pressure and renal function improvement. Furthermore, inflammatory-state regression was confirmed through the reduction of NGAL and MCP-1 levels. At the 3-month follow-up, a stable improvement in renal oxygenation was finally confirmed via BOLD-MRI findings [7][14].
Podocytes and tubular cell progenitors have been found in the Bowman’s capsule. Both cell typologies show a heterogeneous ability to differentiate and regenerate after renal ischemia/reperfusion [105,106][101][102].

References

  1. Rosato, E.; Gigante, A.; Barbano, B.; Gasperini, M.L.; Cianci, R.; Muscaritoli, M. Prognostic Factors of Renal Involvement in Systemic Sclerosis. Kidney Blood Press. Res. 2018, 43, 682–689.
  2. Gigante, A.; Lai, S.; Pellicano, C.; De Marco, O.; Rosato, E.; Giannakakis, K.; D’Amati, G.; Muscaritoli, M.; Ferri, C.; Cianci, R. Nephroangiosclerosis not related to hypertension: A matter to resolve in the era of precision medicine. J. Hum. Hypertens. 2022, in press.
  3. Simeoni, M.; Borrelli, S.; Garofalo, C.; Fuiano, G.; Esposito, C.; Comi, A.; Provenzano, M. Atherosclerotic-nephropathy: An updated narrative review. J. Nephrol. 2021, 34, 125–136.
  4. Textor, S.C.; Lerman, L.O. The Role of Hypoxia in Ischemic Chronic Kidney Disease. Semin. Nephrol. 2019, 39, 589–598.
  5. Textor, S.C.; Lerman, L. Renovascular hypertension and ischemic nephropathy. Am. J. Hypertens. 2010, 23, 1159–1169.
  6. Li, Z.L.; Liu, B.C. Hypoxia and Renal Tubulointerstitial Fibrosis. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2019, 1165, 467–485.
  7. Capolongo, G.; Suzumoto, Y.; D’Acierno, M.; Simeoni, M.; Capasso, G.; Zacchia, M. ERK1,2 Signalling Pathway along the Nephron and Its Role in Acid-base and Electrolytes Balance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4153.
  8. Hill, G.S. Hypertensive nephrosclerosis. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 2008, 17, 266–270.
  9. Neusser, M.A.; Lindenmeyer, M.T.; Moll, A.G.; Segerer, S.; Edenhofer, I.; Sen, K.; Stiehl, D.P.; Kretzler, M.; Grone, H.J.; Schlondorff, D.; et al. Human nephrosclerosis triggers a hypoxia-related glomerulopathy. Am. J. Pathol. 2010, 176, 594–607.
  10. Yu, B.; Wang, X.; Song, Y.; Xie, G.; Jiao, S.; Shi, L.; Cao, X.; Han, X.; Qu, A. The role of hypoxia-inducible factors in cardiovascular diseases. Pharmacol. Ther. 2022, 238, 108186.
  11. Palomaki, S.; Pietila, M.; Laitinen, S.; Pesala, J.; Sormunen, R.; Lehenkari, P.; Koivunen, P. HIF-1alpha is upregulated in human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 2013, 31, 1902–1909.
  12. Ziello, J.E.; Jovin, I.S.; Huang, Y. Hypoxia-Inducible Factor (HIF)-1 regulatory pathway and its potential for therapeutic intervention in malignancy and ischemia. Yale J. Biol. Med. 2007, 80, 51–60.
  13. Sun, J.; Shen, H.; Shao, L.; Teng, X.; Chen, Y.; Liu, X.; Yang, Z.; Shen, Z. HIF-1alpha overexpression in mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes mediates cardioprotection in myocardial infarction by enhanced angiogenesis. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2020, 11, 373.
  14. Abumoawad, A.; Saad, A.; Ferguson, C.M.; Eirin, A.; Woollard, J.R.; Herrmann, S.M.; Hickson, L.J.; Bendel, E.C.; Misra, S.; Glockner, J.; et al. Tissue hypoxia, inflammation, and loss of glomerular filtration rate in human atherosclerotic renovascular disease. Kidney Int. 2019, 95, 948–957.
  15. Nensén, O.; Hansell, P.; Palm, F. Intrarenal oxygenation determines kidney function during the recovery from an ischemic insult. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2020, 319, F1067–F1072.
  16. Cianci, R.; Perrotta, A.M.; Gigante, A.; Errigo, F.; Ferri, C.; Cianci, E.; Simeoni, M.; Mazzaferro, S.; Lai, S. Ischemic Nephropaty: The Role of the Renal Artery Stenosis Revascularization on Renal Stem Cells. Medicina 2021, 57, 944.
  17. Nordquist, L.; Friederich-Persson, M.; Fasching, A.; Liss, P.; Shoji, K.; Nangaku, M.; Hansell, P.; Palm, F. Activation of hypoxia-inducible factors prevents diabetic nephropathy. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2015, 26, 328–338.
  18. Haase, V.H. Hypoxia-inducible factors in the kidney. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2006, 291, F271–F281.
  19. Pruijm, M.; Milani, B.; Pivin, E.; Podhajska, A.; Vogt, B.; Stuber, M.; Burnier, M. Reduced cortical oxygenation predicts a progressive decline of renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2018, 93, 932–940.
  20. Kinsey, G.R. Macrophage dynamics in AKI to CKD progression. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2014, 25, 209–211.
  21. Hirakawa, Y.; Tanaka, T.; Nangaku, M. Renal Hypoxia in CKD.; Pathophysiology and Detecting Methods. Front. Physiol. 2017, 8, 99.
  22. Nacu, N.; Luzina, I.G.; Highsmith, K.; Lockatell, V.; Pochetuhen, K.; Cooper, Z.A.; Gillmeister, M.P.; Todd, N.W.; Atamas, S.P. Macrophages produce TGF-beta-induced (beta-ig-h3) following ingestion of apoptotic cells and regulate MMP14 levels and collagen turnover in fibroblasts. J. Immunol. 2008, 180, 5036–5044.
  23. Ito, Y.; Goldschmeding, R.; Kasuga, H.; Claessen, N.; Nakayama, M.; Yuzawa, Y.; Sawai, A.; Matsuo, S.; Weening, J.J.; Aten, J. Expression patterns of connective tissue growth factor and of TGF-beta isoforms during glomerular injury recapitulate glomerulogenesis. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2010, 299, F545–F558.
  24. Cianci, R.; Martina, P.; Cianci, M.; Lavini, R.; Stivali, G.; Di Donato, D.; Polidori, L.; Lai, S.; Renzulli, R.; Gigante, A.; et al. Ischemic nephropathy: Proteinuria and renal resistance index could suggest if revascularization is recommended. Ren. Fail. 2010, 32, 1167–1171.
  25. Cianfrone, P.; Simeoni, M.; Comi, N.; Piraina, V.; Talarico, R.; Cerantonio, A.; Gentile, I.; Fabiano, F.F.; Lucisano, G.; Foti, D.; et al. How to improve duration and efficiency of the antiproteinuric response to Ramipril: RamiPROT-a prospective cohort study. J. Nephrol. 2017, 30, 95–102.
  26. Simeoni, M.; Cianfrone, P.; Comi, N.; Gentile, I.; Fabiano, F.F.; Piraina, V.; Talarico, R.; Lucisano, G.; Rivoli, L.; Andreucci, M.; et al. Is it feasible to improve the duration and the efficiency of Ramipril anti-proteinuric response? G. Ital. Nefrol. 2015, 32, gin-32.
  27. Bhalla, V.; Textor, S.C.; Beckman, J.A.; Casanegra, A.I.; Cooper, C.J.; Kim, E.S.H.; Luther, J.M.; Misra, S.; Oderich, G.S.; American Heart Association Council on the Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease; et al. Revascularization for Renovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Hypertension 2022, 79, e128–e143.
  28. Herrmann, S.M.; Textor, S.C. Current Concepts in the Treatment of Renovascular Hypertension. Am. J. Hypertens. 2018, 31, 139–149.
  29. Aukland, K.; Krog, J. Renal oxygen tension. Nature 1960, 188, 671.
  30. Brezis, M.; Heyman, S.N.; Dinour, D.; Epstein, F.H.; Rosen, S. Role of nitric oxide in renal medullary oxygenation. Studies in isolated and intact rat kidneys. J. Clin. Investig. 1991, 88, 390–395.
  31. Gullichsen, E.; Nelimarkka, O.; Halkola, L.; Niinikoski, J. Renal oxygenation in endotoxin shock in dogs. Crit. Care Med. 1989, 17, 547–550.
  32. Evans, R.G.; Iguchi, N.; Cochrane, A.D.; Marino, B.; Hood, S.G.; Bellomo, R.; McCall, P.R.; May, C.N.; Lankadeva, Y.R. Renal hemodynamics and oxygenation during experimental cardiopulmonary bypass in sheep under total intravenous anesthesia. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2020, 318, R206–R213.
  33. Sugahara, M.; Tanaka, T.; Nangaku, M. Hypoxia-Inducible Factor and Oxygen Biology in the Kidney. Kidney360 2020, 1, 1021–1031.
  34. Evans, R.G.; Gardiner, B.S.; Smith, D.W.; O’Connor, P.M. Methods for studying the physiology of kidney oxygenation. Clin. Exp. Pharm. Physiol. 2008, 35, 1405–1412.
  35. Nangaku, M.; Eckardt, K.U. Hypoxia and the HIF system in kidney disease. J. Mol. Med. 2007, 85, 1325–1330.
  36. Rosenberger, C.; Mandriota, S.; Jurgensen, J.S.; Wiesener, M.S.; Horstrup, J.H.; Frei, U.; Ratcliffe, P.J.; Maxwell, P.H.; Bachmann, S.; Eckardt, K.U. Expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha and -2alpha in hypoxic and ischemic rat kidneys. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2002, 13, 1721–1732.
  37. Cao, J.; Lu, X.; Gao, F.; Zhang, X.; Xia, X.; Sun, H. Assessment of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as an early biomarker for canine renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. Ann. Transl. Med. 2020, 8, 1491.
  38. Strazzulla, A.; Coppolino, G.; Barreca, G.S.; Gentile, I.; Rivoli, L.; Postorino, M.C.; Mazzitelli, M.; Greco, G.; Costa, C.; Pisani, V.; et al. Evolution of glomerular filtration rates and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin during treatment with direct acting antivirals. Clin. Mol. Hepatol. 2018, 24, 151–162.
  39. Textor, S.C.; Abumoawad, A.; Saad, A.; Ferguson, C.; Dietz, A. Stem Cell Therapy for Microvascular Injury Associated with Ischemic Nephropathy. Cells 2021, 10, 765.
  40. Pruijm, M.; Mendichovszky, I.A.; Liss, P.; Van der Niepen, P.; Textor, S.C.; Lerman, L.O.; Krediet, C.T.P.; Caroli, A.; Burnier, M.; Prasad, P.V. Renal blood oxygenation level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging to measure renal tissue oxygenation: A statement paper and systematic review. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2018, 33, ii22–ii28.
  41. Gloviczki, M.L.; Saad, A.; Textor, S.C. Blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) MRI analysis in atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 2013, 22, 519–524.
  42. Honda, T.; Hirakawa, Y.; Nangaku, M. The role of oxidative stress and hypoxia in renal disease. Kidney Res. Clin. Pract. 2019, 38, 414–426.
  43. Karopadi, A.N. Analysis of Costs in Renal Replacement Therapy. Perit Dial. Int. 2017, 37, 497–499.
  44. Grange, C.; Skovronova, R.; Marabese, F.; Bussolati, B. Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles and Kidney Regeneration. Cells 2019, 8, 1240.
  45. Purwaningrum, M.; Jamilah, N.S.; Purbantoro, S.D.; Sawangmake, C.; Nantavisai, S. Comparative characteristic study from bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J. Vet. Sci. 2021, 22, e74.
  46. Tsiapalis, D.; O’Driscoll, L. Mesenchymal Stem Cell Derived Extracellular Vesicles for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Applications. Cells 2020, 9, 991.
  47. Birtwistle, L.; Chen, X.M.; Pollock, C. Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles to the Rescue of Renal Injury. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 6596.
  48. Keshtkar, S.; Azarpira, N.; Ghahremani, M.H. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles: Novel frontiers in regenerative medicine. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2018, 9, 63.
  49. Roufosse, C.; Cook, H.T. Stem cells and renal regeneration. Nephron Exp. Nephrol. 2008, 109, e39–e45.
  50. Wise, A.F.; Ricardo, S.D. Mesenchymal stem cells in kidney inflammation and repair. Nephrology 2012, 17, 1–10.
  51. Rojas-Canales, D.M.; Li, J.Y.; Makuei, L.; Gleadle, J.M. Compensatory renal hypertrophy following nephrectomy: When and how? Nephrology 2019, 24, 1225–1232.
  52. Simeoni, M.; Armeni, A.; Summaria, C.; Cerantonio, A.; Fuiano, G. Current evidence on the use of anti-RAAS agents in congenital or acquired solitary kidney. Ren. Fail. 2017, 39, 660–670.
  53. Fortrie, G.; de Geus, H.R.H.; Betjes, M.G.H. The aftermath of acute kidney injury: A narrative review of long-term mortality and renal function. Crit. Care 2019, 23, 24.
  54. Cianci, R.; Simeoni, M.; Gigante, A.; Marco Perrotta, A.; Ronchey, S.; Mangialardi, N.; Schioppa, A.; De Marco, O.; Cianci, E.; Barbati, C.; et al. Renal Stem Cells, Renal Resistive Index, and Neutrophil Gelatinase Associated Lipocalin Changes After Revascularization in Patients With Renovascular Hypertension and Ischemic Nephropathy. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2022, 29, 133–138.
  55. Romagnani, P. Toward the identification of a “renopoietic system”? Stem Cells 2009, 27, 2247–2253.
  56. Humphreys, B.D.; Valerius, M.T.; Kobayashi, A.; Mugford, J.W.; Soeung, S.; Duffield, J.S.; McMahon, A.P.; Bonventre, J.V. Intrinsic epithelial cells repair the kidney after injury. Cell Stem Cell 2008, 2, 284–291.
  57. Brooke, G.; Cook, M.; Blair, C.; Han, R.; Heazlewood, C.; Jones, B.; Kambouris, M.; Kollar, K.; McTaggart, S.; Pelekanos, R.; et al. Therapeutic applications of mesenchymal stromal cells. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2007, 18, 846–858.
  58. Fox, J.M.; Chamberlain, G.; Ashton, B.A.; Middleton, J. Recent advances into the understanding of mesenchymal stem cell trafficking. Br. J. Haematol. 2007, 137, 491–502.
  59. Lv, B.; Hua, T.; Li, F.; Han, J.; Fang, J.; Xu, L.; Sun, C.; Zhang, Z.; Feng, Z.; Jiang, X. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha protects mesenchymal stem cells against oxygen-glucose deprivation-induced injury via autophagy induction and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2017, 9, 2492–2499.
  60. Togel, F.; Isaac, J.; Hu, Z.; Weiss, K.; Westenfelder, C. Renal SDF-1 signals mobilization and homing of CXCR4-positive cells to the kidney after ischemic injury. Kidney Int. 2005, 67, 1772–1784.
  61. Hung, S.C.; Pochampally, R.R.; Hsu, S.C.; Sanchez, C.; Chen, S.C.; Spees, J.; Prockop, D.J. Short-term exposure of multipotent stromal cells to low oxygen increases their expression of CX3CR1 and CXCR4 and their engraftment in vivo. PLoS ONE 2007, 2, e416.
  62. Ji, J.F.; He, B.P.; Dheen, S.T.; Tay, S.S. Interactions of chemokines and chemokine receptors mediate the migration of mesenchymal stem cells to the impaired site in the brain after hypoglossal nerve injury. Stem Cells 2004, 22, 415–427.
  63. Ponte, A.L.; Marais, E.; Gallay, N.; Langonne, A.; Delorme, B.; Herault, O.; Charbord, P.; Domenech, J. The in vitro migration capacity of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells: Comparison of chemokine and growth factor chemotactic activities. Stem Cells 2007, 25, 1737–1745.
  64. Little, M.H.; Bertram, J.F. Is there such a thing as a renal stem cell? J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2009, 20, 2112–2117.
  65. Appel, D.; Kershaw, D.B.; Smeets, B.; Yuan, G.; Fuss, A.; Frye, B.; Elger, M.; Kriz, W.; Floege, J.; Moeller, M.J. Recruitment of podocytes from glomerular parietal epithelial cells. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2009, 20, 333–343.
  66. Ronconi, E.; Sagrinati, C.; Angelotti, M.L.; Lazzeri, E.; Mazzinghi, B.; Ballerini, L.; Parente, E.; Becherucci, F.; Gacci, M.; Carini, M.; et al. Regeneration of glomerular podocytes by human renal progenitors. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2009, 20, 322–332.
  67. Sagrinati, C.; Netti, G.S.; Mazzinghi, B.; Lazzeri, E.; Liotta, F.; Frosali, F.; Ronconi, E.; Meini, C.; Gacci, M.; Squecco, R.; et al. Isolation and characterization of multipotent progenitor cells from the Bowman’s capsule of adult human kidneys. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2006, 17, 2443–2456.
  68. Bruce, S.J.; Rea, R.W.; Steptoe, A.L.; Busslinger, M.; Bertram, J.F.; Perkins, A.C. In vitro differentiation of murine embryonic stem cells toward a renal lineage. Differentiation 2007, 75, 337–349.
  69. Bartholomew, A.; Sturgeon, C.; Siatskas, M.; Ferrer, K.; McIntosh, K.; Patil, S.; Hardy, W.; Devine, S.; Ucker, D.; Deans, R.; et al. Mesenchymal stem cells suppress lymphocyte proliferation in vitro and prolong skin graft survival in vivo. Exp. Hematol. 2002, 30, 42–48.
  70. Tang, M.; Zhang, K.; Li, Y.; He, Q.H.; Li, G.Q.; Zheng, Q.Y.; Zhang, K.Q. Mesenchymal stem cells alleviate acute kidney injury by down-regulating C5a/C5aR pathway activation. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2018, 50, 1545–1553.
  71. Zhang, D.; Fu, L.; Wang, L.; Lin, L.; Yu, L.; Zhang, L.; Shang, T. Therapeutic benefit of mesenchymal stem cells in pregnant rats with angiotensin receptor agonistic autoantibody-induced hypertension: Implications for immunomodulation and cytoprotection. Hypertens. Pregnancy 2017, 36, 247–258.
  72. Reinders, M.E.; Fibbe, W.E.; Rabelink, T.J. Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cell therapy in renal disease and kidney transplantation. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2010, 25, 17–24.
  73. Ortiz, L.A.; Dutreil, M.; Fattman, C.; Pandey, A.C.; Torres, G.; Go, K.; Phinney, D.G. Interleukin 1 receptor antagonist mediates the antiinflammatory and antifibrotic effect of mesenchymal stem cells during lung injury. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 11002–11007.
  74. Bi, B.; Schmitt, R.; Israilova, M.; Nishio, H.; Cantley, L.G. Stromal cells protect against acute tubular injury via an endocrine effect. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2007, 18, 2486–2496.
  75. Imberti, B.; Morigi, M.; Tomasoni, S.; Rota, C.; Corna, D.; Longaretti, L.; Rottoli, D.; Valsecchi, F.; Benigni, A.; Wang, J.; et al. Insulin-like growth factor-1 sustains stem cell mediated renal repair. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2007, 18, 2921–2928.
  76. Semedo, P.; Palasio, C.G.; Oliveira, C.D.; Feitoza, C.Q.; Goncalves, G.M.; Cenedeze, M.A.; Wang, P.M.; Teixeira, V.P.; Reis, M.A.; Pacheco-Silva, A.; et al. Early modulation of inflammation by mesenchymal stem cell after acute kidney injury. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2009, 9, 677–682.
  77. Togel, F.; Cohen, A.; Zhang, P.; Yang, Y.; Hu, Z.; Westenfelder, C. Autologous and allogeneic marrow stromal cells are safe and effective for the treatment of acute kidney injury. Stem Cells Dev. 2009, 18, 475–485.
  78. Togel, F.; Hu, Z.; Weiss, K.; Isaac, J.; Lange, C.; Westenfelder, C. Administered mesenchymal stem cells protect against ischemic acute renal failure through differentiation-independent mechanisms. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2005, 289, F31–F42.
  79. Togel, F.; Weiss, K.; Yang, Y.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, P.; Westenfelder, C. Vasculotropic, paracrine actions of infused mesenchymal stem cells are important to the recovery from acute kidney injury. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2007, 292, F1626–F1635.
  80. Yuan, L.; Wu, M.J.; Sun, H.Y.; Xiong, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, C.Y.; Fu, L.L.; Liu, D.M.; Liu, H.Q.; Mei, C.L. VEGF-modified human embryonic mesenchymal stem cell implantation enhances protection against cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2011, 300, F207–F218.
  81. Wilson, H.M.; Walbaum, D.; Rees, A.J. Macrophages and the kidney. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 2004, 13, 285–290.
  82. Zhang, M.; Johnson-Stephenson, T.K.; Wang, W.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Li, L.; Zen, K.; Chen, X.; Zhu, D. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosome-educated macrophages alleviate systemic lupus erythematosus by promoting efferocytosis and recruitment of IL-17(+) regulatory T cell. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2022, 13, 484.
  83. Stout, R.D.; Jiang, C.; Matta, B.; Tietzel, I.; Watkins, S.K.; Suttles, J. Macrophages sequentially change their functional phenotype in response to changes in microenvironmental influences. J. Immunol. 2005, 175, 342–349.
  84. Simeoni, M.; Nicotera, R.; Colao, M.; Citraro, M.L.; Pelagi, E.; Cerantonio, A.; Comi, N.; Coppolino, G.; Fuiano, G. Direct inhibition of plasmatic renin activity with aliskiren: A promising but under-investigated therapeutic option for non-diabetic glomerulonephritis. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2016, 48, 229–237.
  85. Bailey, C.J.; Day, C.; Bellary, S. Renal Protection with SGLT2 Inhibitors: Effects in Acute and Chronic Kidney Disease. Curr. Diabetes Rep. 2022, 22, 39–52.
  86. Kohan, D.E.; Barton, M. Endothelin and endothelin antagonists in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2014, 86, 896–904.
  87. Ahmed, H.H.; Toson, E.A.; El-Mezayen, H.A.; Rashed, L.A.; Elsherbiny, E.S. Role of mesenchymal stem cells versus angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor in kidney repair. Nephrology 2017, 22, 531–540.
  88. Tsuji, K.; Kitamura, S.; Wada, J. Potential Strategies for Kidney Regeneration With Stem Cells: An Overview. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022, 10, 892356.
  89. Zupan, J.; Strazar, K.; Kocijan, R.; Nau, T.; Grillari, J.; Marolt Presen, D. Age-related alterations and senescence of mesenchymal stromal cells: Implications for regenerative treatments of bones and joints. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2021, 198, 111539.
  90. Mitalipov, S.; Wolf, D. Totipotency, pluripotency and nuclear reprogramming. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 2009, 114, 185–199.
  91. Bochon, B.; Kozubska, M.; Surygala, G.; Witkowska, A.; Kuzniewicz, R.; Grzeszczak, W.; Wystrychowski, G. Mesenchymal Stem Cells-Potential Applications in Kidney Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2462.
  92. Yang, Y.; Lee, E.H.; Yang, Z. Hypoxia-Conditioned Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Tissue Regeneration Application. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2022, 28, 966–977.
  93. Isik, B.; Thaler, R.; Goksu, B.B.; Conley, S.M.; Al-Khafaji, H.; Mohan, A.; Afarideh, M.; Abumoawad, A.M.; Zhu, X.Y.; Krier, J.D.; et al. Hypoxic preconditioning induces epigenetic changes and modifies swine mesenchymal stem cell angiogenesis and senescence in experimental atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2021, 12, 240.
  94. Ishiuchi, N.; Nakashima, A.; Doi, S.; Yoshida, K.; Maeda, S.; Kanai, R.; Yamada, Y.; Ike, T.; Doi, T.; Kato, Y.; et al. Hypoxia-preconditioned mesenchymal stem cells prevent renal fibrosis and inflammation in ischemia-reperfusion rats. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2020, 11, 130.
  95. Chen, X.J.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, K.; Krier, J.D.; Zhu, X.; Conley, S.; Lerman, A.; Lerman, L.O. Adjunctive mesenchymal stem/stromal cells augment microvascular function in poststenotic kidneys treated with low-energy shockwave therapy. J. Cell Physiol. 2020, 235, 9806–9818.
  96. Zhang, X.; Krier, J.D.; Amador Carrascal, C.; Greenleaf, J.F.; Ebrahimi, B.; Hedayat, A.F.; Textor, S.C.; Lerman, A.; Lerman, L.O. Low-Energy Shockwave Therapy Improves Ischemic Kidney Microcirculation. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2016, 27, 3715–3724.
  97. Zhao, Y.; Santelli, A.; Zhu, X.Y.; Zhang, X.; Woollard, J.R.; Chen, X.J.; Jordan, K.L.; Krier, J.; Tang, H.; Saadiq, I.; et al. Low-Energy Shockwave Treatment Promotes Endothelial Progenitor Cell Homing to the Stenotic Pig Kidney. Cell Transplant. 2020, 29, 963689720917342.
  98. Fang, Y.; Tian, X.; Bai, S.; Fan, J.; Hou, W.; Tong, H.; Li, D. Autologous transplantation of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells ameliorates streptozotocin-induced diabetic nephropathy in rats by inhibiting oxidative stress, pro-inflammatory cytokines and the p38 MAPK signaling pathway. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2012, 30, 85–92.
  99. Ni, W.; Fang, Y.; Xie, L.; Liu, X.; Shan, W.; Zeng, R.; Liu, J.; Liu, X. Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Transplantation Alleviates Renal Injury in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Nephropathy. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2015, 63, 842–853.
  100. Duan, Y.; Luo, Q.; Wang, Y.; Ma, Y.; Chen, F.; Zhu, X.; Shi, J. Adipose mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles containing microRNA-26a-5p target TLR4 and protect against diabetic nephropathy. J. Biol. Chem. 2020, 295, 12868–12884.
  101. Bussolati, B.; Bruno, S.; Grange, C.; Buttiglieri, S.; Deregibus, M.C.; Cantino, D.; Camussi, G. Isolation of renal progenitor cells from adult human kidney. Am. J. Pathol. 2005, 166, 545–555.
  102. Dekel, B.; Zangi, L.; Shezen, E.; Reich-Zeliger, S.; Eventov-Friedman, S.; Katchman, H.; Jacob-Hirsch, J.; Amariglio, N.; Rechavi, G.; Margalit, R.; et al. Isolation and characterization of nontubular sca-1+lin- multipotent stem/progenitor cells from adult mouse kidney. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2006, 17, 3300–3314.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Video Production Service
Feedback