Today’s greatest challenges are the management of plastic waste and the reduction of environmental plastic pollution, especially keeping in mind the increasing demand for plastic products. Owing to the challenges present in the current scenario, there is a need to urgently switch the strategy of plastic handling from landfilling and incineration towards a more sustainable and environmentally friendly alternative. Plastic waste can be treated via different pathways as illustrated in Figure 1.
One of the most efficient ways of handling plastic waste is to extract and utilize energy from it. Compared to incineration and landfill disposal, fuel conversion from plastics can reduce hazardous emissions and pathogen contamination. In the process of creating fuel from waste plastic, reaction factors (such as temperature, residence time and rate of increase of temperature) can control the overall conversion process.
2. Conventional Techniques for Thermal Treatment of Plastic Waste
2.1. Pyrolysis
Pyrolysis refers to thermal degradation of plastic waste in the absence of oxygen to produce liquid and gaseous fuels
[17]. Temperature for the pyrolysis process generally ranges between 300–700 °C. It offers several benefits as compared to other ways of handling plastic waste, such as greater strength and flexibility, elimination of cost associated with segregation, washing and blending before mechanical recycling, the ability to treat both thermoset and thermoplastic and in the handling of polymer composites in engineering applications
[18]. Composition of final product and yield is dependent on the composition of feedstock, temperature, reactor configuration, rate of heating and catalyst
[19]. The choice of reactor has a significant impact on the efficiency of the reaction leading to the desired end product, residence time, heat transfer, and mixing of the polymers and catalysts. Most of the plastic pyrolysis in laboratories was carried out in batch, semi-batch or continuous-flow reactors like fluidized beds, fixed-bed reactors and conical spouted beds (CSBR).
A batch reactor is essentially a closed system as no reactants or products can enter or leave it while the reaction is taking place. One of the benefits of a batch reactor is that a high conversion can be attained by keeping the reactant in the reactor for a long time. The variability of the product from batch to batch, high labor expenses in each batch and the difficulties of large-scale manufacturing are the drawbacks associated with the batch reactor. A semi-batch reactor, however, enables simultaneous reactant addition and product removal. Regarding reaction selectivity, the semi-batch reactor also has the option of gradually introducing reactants. Semi-batch reactors have similar labor cost issues as batch reactors. As such, they are better suited for small-scale production.
The catalyst is often palletized and packed in a static bed in fixed-bed reactors. Although it is simple to design, there are certain limitations, like the irregular particle size and type of plastics used as feedstock, which present issues during the feeding process. Additionally, the reaction has a finite amount of access to the catalyst’s surface area. In some circumstances, fixed-bed reactors are only employed as the secondary pyrolysis reactor, because the product from primary pyrolysis may be readily fed into the fixed-bed reactor, which typically comprises liquid and gaseous phases.
However, some of the issues that arise within fixed-bed reactors are resolved by fluidized bed reactors. In contrast to a fixed-bed reactor, the catalyst in fluidized bed reactors is carried in a fluid condition by the fluidizing gas as it travels over a distributer plate. Since the catalyst is well-mixed with the fluid, a greater surface area for the reaction to occur is provided and there is improved access to the catalyst
[20]. Due to the lower operating cost, a fluidized bed reactor would therefore be the optimal reactor to deploy in the pilot plant on a conventional design size.
The conical spouted bed reactor (CSBR) offers good mixing and can handle larger particles, a wide range of particle densities and broad particle size distribution. Olazar et al.
[21] asserted that a CSBR outperformed bubbling fluidized beds in terms of attrition and bed segregation. Additionally, it had a moderate de-fluidization issue while working with sticky solids and a high heat transfer rate between phases. However, several technical difficulties with the reactor’s operation, including catalyst feeding, catalyst entrainment and product (solid and liquid) collection, make it less advantageous.
2.1.1. Thermal Pyrolysis
In this process, depolymerization or cracking of plastics take place at a temperature ranging between 350–900 °C in absence of oxygen, thus producing liquid and gaseous fuel and carbonized char
[22]. The condensable component of the volatile product is normally recovered after condensation as liquid fuel, while the remaining portion is a non-condensable gas of high calorific value. Thermal pyrolysis of plastic waste can used to convert the plastic waste to both liquid and gaseous fuel on an economically viable scale.
Table 1 summarizes various studies that have been undertaken on thermal pyrolysis.
Table 1.
Summary of research studies carried out by various research groups on thermal pyrolysis of plastic waste.
For waste valorization operations, spouted beds are an alternative to fluidized beds due to their specific characteristics like rapid heat and mass transfer rates, effective solid mixing and relatively better gas-solid contact. Additionally, their vigorous cyclic solid circulation prevents de-fluidization issues and makes it easier to handle sticky materials, irregular particles and particles with a wide size range. Their use in gasification processes is primarily constrained by the volatile’s short residence times, which impede tar cracking reactions. This technology has been extensively employed in bench scale setups for the pyrolysis of various solid wastes. The biomass pyrolysis process has been successfully scaled up to 25 kg per hour.
Plasma Gasifier
Waste materials are converted into gaseous products by plasma gasification operations in an oxidizing atmosphere. The primary benefit of plasma reactors for plastic gasification is the high temperature attainment, which encourages practically complete breaking of tar compounds and, consequently, high gas yields by improving the elimination of hazardous compounds. According to the methods used for plasma discharge, three kinds of plasma technologies—radio frequency, microwave, and direct current—have been established.
Pyrolysis-Reforming Process
This procedure, which aims to produce hydrogen, is carried out in two reactors that are connected in order to perform the pyrolysis and reforming processes. Most of the bench and laboratory scale units with various reactor configurations have been used to study this unique method. Czernik and French
[62][75] conducted the ground-breaking research in a continuous system that consumed 0.06 kg of plastic every hour. The experimental unit consisted of a fluidized bed for plastic pyrolysis and a stationary bed for the catalytic reforming of the volatiles produced.
This method has several benefits over conventional steam gasification and steam reforming of bio-oil or plastic pyrolysis oil, including: (a) operation under optimum conditions because the two reactors are integrated into one unit (the reforming temperature is lower than that used in the gasification process, reducing potential catalyst sintering issues); (b) prevention of tar formation; and (c) direct contact between the feedstock and the catalyst. However, the effectiveness of the reforming catalyst will determine the development of the combined pyrolysis and in-line reforming process. Thus, to increase H
2 production, obtain complete conversion of pyrolysis volatiles and prevent tar formation, highly active and selective catalysts are needed
[63][84].
2.2.4. Gasification Reactions
The reactions that occur inside the gasifier are complicated reactions as shown in
Table 4. The reactions are generally classified into five types: (i) carbon reactions, (ii) oxidation reactions, (iii) shift reactions, (iv) methanation reactions and (v) steam reforming reactions.
Table 4. Main gasification reactions [64]. Main gasification reactions [85].
2.1.2. Microwave-Assisted Pyrolysis
In this process, a dielectric material is heated by microwave radiation and thus referred to as microwave pyrolysis. The interaction of microwave radiation with materials depends on their dielectric qualities. The incoming microwaves may be reflected as with conductors or transmitted as in the case of perfect insulators. They may even get absorbed and decay inside some material. Agitation of molecules in the presence of electromagnetic fields results in the generation of heat. With plastic, the microwave energy is absorbed through the absorbent and, then it transfers thermal heat to the plastic by conduction. The uniformity of heating dispersion is influenced by the absorbent’s physical qualities and volume ratio. Additionally, varying microwave power results in radically different product dispersion. Microwave-induced pyrolysis has been proven to be a viable method for producing value-added chemicals and fuels due to its significant advantages over thermal and catalytic pyrolysis
[49]. The method could be used to heat plastics quickly, volumetrically and selectively for energy recovery. Plastics, meanwhile, are unable to absorb microwave energy due to their low dielectric loss factor. Therefore, to favour pyrolysis, plastic must be combined with the absorbent. Plastic materials with a high dielectric loss factor, like shredded tyres and silicon carbide, carbon and iron mesh, are ideal choices
[32][33][34][32,33,34]. Various studies have been conducted on pyrolysis of plastic waste using microwave dielectric heating as shown in
Table 2.
Table 2.
Summary of studies on microwave pyrolysis of plastic waste.
2.1.3. Catalytic Pyrolysis
A catalyst speeds up the chemical reactions without affecting the process as it progresses. In industry and research, catalysts are frequently employed to enhance product selectivity and optimize product distribution. In order to produce products with significant economic value like automobile fuel (diesel and gasoline) and C
2-C
4 olefins, which are in high demand in the petrochemical industry, catalytic degradation is therefore particularly intriguing. When a catalyst is utilized, the process activation energy is reduced, accelerating the pace of reaction. As a result, a catalyst lowers the temperature needed, which is significant as the pyrolysis process consumes a lot of energy (it is extremely endothermic). Heat is one of the most expensive factors in any industry; therefore, using a catalyst may assist in saving energy. Additionally, numerous researchers employed catalysts for product improvement and to enhance the hydrocarbon distribution in order to produce pyrolysis liquid with qualities comparable to those of conventional fuels like gasoline and diesel.
Polymer degradation is brought about by catalytic pyrolysis in which the material is heated in the presence of catalyst and in absence of oxygen. Catalyst usage offers several advantages like reduced consumption of energy, modified composition of product on cracking and reduced process time. In literature, zeolites, fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) and silica-alumina based catalysts are mostly reported for pyrolysis of plastic waste
[35][36][37][35,36,37]. Zeolite-based catalysts have a greater acid strength compared to non-zeolite catalysts, and they often accomplish higher conversion and produce more gaseous product.
There are two methods for catalytic upgradation of pyrolysis vapors: in-situ and ex-situ. In the in-situ approach, the catalyst is combined with the feedstock and added to the pyrolysis reactor, while in the ex-situ mode, the catalyst is added to a different reactor situated downstream of the pyrolysis reactor. In-situ catalytic pyrolysis does not require a separate catalytic reactor, thereby lowering the overall capital cost of setup manufacturing and operational costs. However, the catalyst deactivates more quickly if the feedstock has a high mineral and ash content
[50].
The fact that the catalytic temperature is the same as the pyrolysis temperature, and that the optimal pyrolysis temperature may not be ideal for catalytic cracking, is another drawback of the in-situ catalyst application approach
[51]. An ex-situ catalytic upgrading mode is thought to be more appealing for feedstock with a high ash concentration than an in-situ mode. Additionally, char may be obtained as a useful product and catalyst regeneration is also simple. An additional element that makes this mode more adaptable and hence desirable is the provision of separate temperature controls for pyrolysis and catalysis
[52].
Either mode of adding the catalyst will result in the conversion of oxygenated molecules into stable hydrocarbons. However, the yield of important hydrocarbons in oil also varies based on the feedstock, the kind of reactor and the operating circumstances. An in-situ contact method increased aromatics production in the catalytic pyrolysis of polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET), but an ex-situ mode was shown to be more successful in increasing aromatic yield in the case of polystyrene (PS)
[50]. However, there are very little research examining the impact of the catalyst contact method in the simultaneous pyrolysis of plastic and biomass.
2.2. Gasification
Gasification is a thermo-chemical process involving multiple chemical reactions wherein a carbon containing feedstock like plastic waste is converted into synthetic gas in a partial supply of air, oxygen or steam
[53][69]. The process operates at a sufficiently high temperature (>600–1000 °C) in order to thermally degrade the plastic waste for yielding syngas
[54][70].
Several advantages are associated with gasification, like increased heating value of fuel by rejection of non-combustibles like nitrogen and water, reduction in oxygen content of fuel, exposure to H
2 at high pressure or exposure to steam at high temperatures and pressures where H
2 is added to the product will raise the products relative hydrogen content (H/C ratio).
2.2.1. Gasifying Medium
One of the important parameters to be considered during gasification of plastic waste is the gasifying medium. Gasification can be done in mediums like steam, air, carbon dioxide or oxygen or a combination of these gases
[55][71]. The gasifying medium plays a significant role in converting solid carbon and heavier hydrocarbons into CO and H
2, which are low molecular weight gases. Oxygen is primarily used as a gasifying medium in either pure form or via air, and the products include CO and CO
2 when subjected to low and high oxygen, respectively. Gasification proceeds towards combustion when oxygen is supplied over a threshold limit, resulting in the formation of flue gas instead of synthesis/producer gas. The formed combustion product or the flue gases possess no residual heating value.
Similarly, when steam is used as a gasifying medium, the formed product contains more hydrogen per unit of carbon, thus increasing the H/C ratio. On the other hand, if air is directly used instead of oxygen, nitrogen present in air would dilute the product and the heating value of the gas would be reduced when compared to the heating value of the gas produced from oxygen/steam gasification. Thus, it can be concluded that the highest heating value is obtained when oxygen is used as a gasifying medium, followed by steam and air. The gases produced after air gasification is generally called producer gas whereas the gases produce through oxygen/steam gasification are known as synthesis gas.
Air gasification is a simple process and is advantageous as no external energy is required. Additionally, the output gas has less tar when compared to when steam gasification is used
[56][72]. The syngas produced by steam gasification has a higher H
2/CO ratio than the syngas produced by direct air gasification, making it more suitable for use in chemical synthesis applications
[57][73]. The biggest difficulty with this method is the amount of heat needed to fuel the endothermic steam reforming reactions inside the reactor. Gasification with pure O
2 is an alternative to air and steam as it includes the benefits of both gasifying agents. This method is more complex and expensive, especially for medium-scale applications, due to the high fixed assets and running costs for air separation
[58][74]. More recently, it has been suggested that the pyrolysis and in-line reformation of pyrolysis volatiles is a potential method for valorizing waste plastics for production of H
2 [31][59][60][61][31,53,54,55]. Additionally, this method uses very effective reforming catalysts to produce syngas that is entirely tar-free, addressing the primary difficulty in the traditional gasification of plastic.
2.2.2. Classification of Gasifiers
The primary criteria used to classify gasifiers are the gas-solid contacting mechanism and the gasification medium. Gasifiers have been divided into three main categories based on the manner of gas-solid contact: (1) Fixed or moving bed, (2) Fluidized bed, and (3) Entrained-flow bed. As illustrated in
Figure 2, the direction in which the gasifying medium passes through the bed further categorizes each type of gasifier
[6].
Figure 2.
Classification of gasifiers.
A specific gasifier type might not be appropriate for the entire range of gasifier capacities. For example, moving-bed (updraft and downdraft) types are used for smaller units (under 10 MWth); fluidized-bed types are better suited for intermediate units (between 5 and 100 MWth); and entrained flow reactors are used for high capacity units (above 50 MWth). Major differences between the three gasifier types are summarized in
Table 3.
Table 3.
Major differences between the gasifier types.
An overview of several studies for the effect of temperature on gas production, as well as composition during gasification of plastic waste, can be found in
Table 5.
Table 5.
Summary of plastic waste gasification studies carried out by various research groups around the globe.
In a fixed-bed gasifier, sometimes referred to as a moving-bed gasifier, the fuel is supported on a grate. Due to the fuel’s ability to slide down the gasifier like a plug, this type is also known as a moving bed. One of the main benefits of fixed-bed gasifiers is that they may be built in small quantities at low cost. Because of this, there are a lot of small-scale moving-bed biomass gasifiers in operation all over the world. It is challenging to produce equal distribution of fuel, temperature and gas composition over the cross-section of the gasifier due to poor mixing and heat transfer in the moving (fixed) bed. As a result, during gasification, fuels that are prone to agglomeration may form agglomerates. This is why large-capacity fixed-bed gasifiers are not very successful for biomass fuels or coal with a high caking index.
Fluidized-bed gasifiers are well known for temperature uniformity and mixing. A fluidized bed is made up of bed materials, which are granular particles that are retained in a semi-suspended form (fluidized state) by the movement of the gasifying medium across them at proper velocities. This type of gasifier is essentially unaffected by the quality of the fuel due to the superior gas solid mixing and the substantial thermal inertia of the bed. Additionally, the temperature homogeneity significantly lowers the possibility of fuel agglomeration. For gasifying biomass, the fluidized-bed concept has proven to be quite beneficial.
2.2.3. Other Gasifier Types
Spouted Bed
Syngas is rich in H
2 and CH
4, which can be used as combustible gases, as opposed to pyrolysis, which produces gas products that primarily consist of C
3–C
6. However, because of the dilution effect, the increased gas flow rate during gasification operation leads to lower throughputs, more difficult separation and lower calorific values of products, which has a detrimental influence on the overall economic benefits. Additionally, the gasification process harms the environment by producing noxious gases like NO
X. Additionally, the produced syngas contains various pollutants such NH
3, H
2S, NO
x, alkali metals and significant amounts of tars, necessitating an extra step in purification and raising the cost. A high-temperature environment is necessary for gasification, which raises the cost and requires the use of expensive machinery
.
3. Advanced Oxidation Techniques for Treatment of Plastic Waste
3.1 Photocatalytic Oxidation
Photocatalysis is a technology that imitates the photosynthesis occurring in nature. Usually, there are three separate steps involved: (1) Charge carriers are excited via light absorption by photocatalysts, (2) the photogenerated charge carriers are separated and transported, and (3) the catalyst surface undergoes redox reaction. Photocatalytic oxidation involves oxidative breakdown of polymers into lower molecular weight materials in the presence of ultraviolet (UV) radiation and a photocatalyst which dominates the conversion process.
For photocatalysis to take place, incident photon energies must be greater than or equal to the band gap of the photocatalyst. While the reduction potential of photoelectrons in the conduction band should be greater than that of the reactant to be reduced, the oxidation potential of holes in the valence band of the photocatalyst should be greater than that of the substrate to be oxidised. For the photocatalytic valorisation of plastic waste, the holes in the photocatalysts’ valence band are frequently used to oxidise the plastic to produce organic products or degrade it to CO2, while the electrons in the photocatalyst’s conduction band can be used to reduce the protons in water to H2, CO2 to carbon derived fuels or capturing by oxygen to involve it in the subsequent plastic oxidation.
3.2. Electrocatalytic Oxidation
Conversion of plastics through electrocatalytic oxidation can be brought about using two different methods: direct oxidation and indirect oxidation. Direct oxidation refers to the electrophilic attack on a polymer by ·OH produced by water discharge on the anode surface. When strong oxidising intermediates dominate in the plastic conversion process, it is referred to as indirect oxidation. With an external voltage (0.55 V) applied in H3PO4 solution at 200 °C, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) was successfully converted to H2 (9.5 mol/min) [77]. Also, for the production of carboxylic acid (75%), electrocatalytic degradation of PVC was carried out on TiO2/C cathode (−0.7 V) at 100 °C [78].
A plastic polymer is reduced when it receives electrons from the cathode (TiO2/C), which undergoes dechlorination at a high temperature. Additionally, the polymer is oxidised with ·OH to produce carbonyl and hydroxyl groups, which subsequently breaks down into tiny molecules (e.g., alcohols, carboxylic acids and esters). Finally, these chemicals partially mineralize to CO2 and H2O. Electrocatalytic breakdown of plastic wastes may result in a single product that could be turned directly into fuels. Electrolysis alone cannot yield as many fuel components as pyrolysis and electrolysis combined.
3.3. Fenton Oxidation
The Fenton reaction is an advanced technique that is often used to degrade chemical compounds that are resistant to conventional methods. Fenton oxidation is the process of converting polymers into small molecules by generating ·OH from Fe2+ activated H2O2. The Fenton oxidation process for plastic conversion is usually carried out under mild reaction conditions. Due to rapid breakdown of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), the conversion process is effective, making it advantageous for large-scale applications. However, the procedure uses a lot of H2O2, which increases the cost of operation. Through chemical oxidation reactions, the Fenton reaction can regulate the decomposition of polymer waste to create high-value fine chemicals.