A Review of Nanogrid Architectures, Control, and Converters: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Sirius Huang and Version 1 by Andrea Toscani.

Environmental issues and the global need to extend sustainable access to electricity have fostered a huge amount of research in distributed generation by renewables. The challenges posed by the widespread deployment of distributed generation by renewables, such as intermittent power generation, low inertia, the need for energy storage, etc., call for the development of smart grids serving local specific areas or buildings, referred to as microgrids and nanogrids, respectively. This has led in the last decades to the proposal and actual implementation of a wide variety of system architectures and solutions, and along with that the issue of the power converters needed for interfacing the AC grid with DC micro- or nanogrids, and for DC regulation within the latter. This work offers an overview of the state of the art of research and application of nanogrid architectures, control strategies, and power converters topologies. 

  • nanogrids
  • hierarchical control
  • grid architectures
  • Interfacing power converters
  • Control strategies
  • Power converters classification

1. Introduction

Several factors including the shift towards ever-increasing use of distributed energy resources (DERs) often small or very small in size and power capacity, the need for efficient energy use, progress of battery energy storage system (BESS) technologies in terms of size, weight, and cost reduction, and the introduction of cheaper controllers and smart metering devices, favor the development and deployment of electric microgrids (MGs) and nanogrids (NGs) not only where access to the power grid (PG) is impossible or economically unviable (e.g., remote communities, especially in developing countries) but also in more commonplace scenarios such as residential and commercial buildings [1,2][1][2] where the grid connection is not an issue per se.
While MGs, due to their relatively large size and impact on the development and management of the PG at large, have been the object of significant standardization efforts, NGs—although in a way rather more ubiquitous than the former—are somewhat less clearly defined. Early definitions of NGs, for example, include the following two:
  • “a single domain for voltage, price, reliability, quality, and administration” [3], where the accent is on power distribution only, functional aspects of the loads are disregarded, and power sources are not part of the NG, which may or may not include BESS but must feature a controller device. In this case, NGs can be also seen as clusters of a MG;
  • “a small power system that uses a combination of renewable and non-renewable energy sources to supply power to small local loads” [4]; here, the accent appears to be more on the size of the system, which is seen as a miniature replica of larger power systems, with its own energy sources, storage, loads, and some controlling entity.
Other definitions are referenced in [2].
From the architecture point of view, neither definition can be seen as an absolute delimitation of the NG concept. However, the concepts of MG and NG themselves can be seen as misleading due to a direct link to a scale concept. From the grid architecture point of view, it could be easier to define single domain grids, clusters of single domain grids, and power grid.
Irrespective of the definition of choice, a few common—although non-universal—features of both AC and DC NGs are:
  • local access to some type of DER;
  • use of BESS;
  • connection to the PG (with some islanding capability).
These are key factors giving NGs attractiveness in terms of sustainability (thanks to renewable sources such as PV and wind), efficiency (reduced losses due to proximity between energy sources and loads), reliability and resilience (islanding capability—at least for a limited time—thanks to DERs and BESS), and power quality (short-term voltage stabilization provided by BESS).
These features, similar to those of MGs, inevitably require that the NG be equipped with a variety of static energy converters [5], e.g.,:
  • DC/AC converters to connect DERs with DC power output such as photovoltaic (PV) plants or fuel cells (FCs), as well as BESS, to AC loads, or when a bi-directional connection of a DC NG to the PG is required;
  • DC/DC converters for intra-NG level shifting to power DC loads of different type and sizes, and for voltage boost in battery charge circuits;
  • AC/DC converters for the point of common coupling (PCC) between the PG and a DC NG, or at the interface between an AC NG and BESS.
The increasing diffusion of NG installations and the rapid progress of converter and power semiconductor device technologies make the field of NG converters a very hot and dynamic research area.

2. Nanogrid Architectures

MGs can be classified based on their topology in three major groups, namely, AC, DC, and hybrid [6[6][7],7], as schematically shown in Figure 1. NGs can operate as AC, DC, or hybrid structures, too [5[5][8],8], but they usually have a smaller capacity and serve a smaller area (e.g., a single building or load) [9,10,11][9][10][11].
Figure 1.
Examples of NG architectures: AC grid (
a
), DC grid (
b
), hybrid AC-DC grid (
c
).
Another common trait between MGs and NGs is the ability to operate both in islanded and grid-connected mode [5]. Most of the power transmission in the world is based on AC technology, which historically imposed itself on DC transmission mainly thanks to easy transformer-based voltage step-up for long-distance dispatch [12,13][12][13]. In the case of the AC NG of Figure 1a, energy flows into the AC NG feeder from the utility grid as well as from DERs that may be DC sources, such as PV arrays or batteries, requiring DC/AC converters; however, AC/DC/AC back-to-back converters are often utilized with AC power sources including wind farms, micro-turbines, or tidal power stations, to adapt the voltage level and frequency produced by the AC generators to the grid requirements [14]. On the other hand, large segments of residential and commercial loads consist of low power electronics such as personal computers, battery chargers, or LED lighting systems that require AC/DC conversion to be connected to an AC NG. Connecting these DC loads directly or through high-efficiency DC/DC converters to the bus of a DC NG (Figure 1b) would reduce the need for energy conversion stages and improve the overall efficiency and reliability of the system [15,16][15][16]. Recently, DC NGs have thus become increasingly attractive, also due to the improved performance and reduced cost of native DC systems such as PV, BESS, electric vehicles (EVs), and FCs, which can be connected to a DC grid efficiently and reliably [6,17][6][17]. In fact, avoiding double conversion from DC to AC on the generation side and from AC to DC at the load end, the system complexity is reduced and its efficiency and reliability are increased [11,14,18][11][14][18]. Moreover, the absence of reactive power in DC distribution lines reduces power losses and voltage drops, increases the capacity of electrical lines, and helps to avoid electromagnetic interferences [14]. In [19], the transmitted power is found to increase up to a factor of ten moving from AC to three-line DC distribution. Finally, synchronization issues are avoided [15]. Table 1 summarizes the advantages of the DC NGs over the AC NGs.
Table 1.
Advantages of DC NGs over AC NGs.
Advantages References
Energy conversion stages reduction [15,16][15][16]
Overall efficiency improvement [6,11,14,15,16,17,19][6][11][14][15][16][17][19]
Reliability improvement [6,,15,16,17][6]11[11][15][16][17]
Absence of reactive power and less losses [6,11,14,15][6][11][14][15]
Augmented transmit power capability [6,14,16,19][6][14][16][19]
No electromagnetic interference [6]
Complexity reduction [6,15,16][6][15][16]
No synchronization problems [6,11,14,[11][1415][6]][15]
Control algorithm simplification [6,15,17][6][15][17]
Future DC NGs will likely use two voltage levels: a high-voltage DC (e.g., 380 V) for home appliances or EV charging, and a low-voltage DC (LVDC) (e.g., 48 V) for supplying computers and low-power electronics [5[5][9][15][20],9,15,20], hence the need for efficient DC/DC conversion. The DC NG is connected to the utility grid via a bidirectional AC/DC converter that has to be properly controlled to compensate for the voltage ripple arising on the DC voltage bus: ref. [21] discusses a zero-sequence operation mode of the converter and gives a summary of other ripple mitigation approaches. Refs. [9,22][9][22] for example considers a commercial power system scenario with a large amount of non-linear loads such as lighting appliances, computers, monitors, adjustable-speed drives for air conditioning, etc. A traditional grid scenario, where each load is supplied in AC, is compared with DC-based architecture demonstrating that the latter is convenient from the efficiency, reliability, and economic points of view. A DC bus voltage equal to the peak value of the standard 230 V AC line is shown to be the best solution for supplying DC native AC loads. This prevents the overload of the input rectifiers of the power supply units by lowering the amount of current flowing. Ref. [23] describes a home-level, small power DC NG with AC interface with the PG. A comparison between the modified DC version of the home appliances and the legacy AC ones is carried out in order to show the convenience of the DC distribution. Ref. [24] also presents a residential-level NG implementation featuring a LVDC bus with an additional AC grid interface. Ref. [25] demonstrates the benefits of DC migration showing results of efficiency improvements of various system components in a commercial building supplied by 380 V DC and providing local 24 V plugs for small loads. Finally, a hybrid NG (see Figure 1c) combines separately controlled AC and DC distribution lines to exploit the advantages of both AC and DC grids [26,27,28][26][27][28]: DC loads and DERs can be connected to the DC bus, while AC loads and DERs can be connected to the AC bus, potentially eliminating the need for DC/AC/DC or AC/DC/AC conversion, thus increasing efficiency and reducing complexity and cost. In hybrid MGs [29], as for NGs, the design can be optimized to minimize the cost of investments and maximize energy efficiency through the optimal sizing of DERs, loads, and ESSs following different approaches: a combination of different particle swarm optimization (PSO) based algorithms in [30], a multi-objective optimization of the mathematical model of the MG/NG aimed at minimizing daily energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions [28], or through a time-of-use approach to reduce the cost of energy [31]. Ref. [32] presents a case study of hybrid AC-DC NG, part of a larger campus-level MG. The NG can operate in islanded mode in case of MG faults. The NG is equipped with two sets of PV arrays—separately connected to AC and DC subsystems—and a BESS used by both the subsystems to level-off the PV output power. The DC distribution bus features a 48 V DC voltage while the AC bus is a four wire, three-phase bus with 120 V line-to-neutral voltage. DC/DC buck converters interface a set of PV arrays with the DC subsystem. The other set of PV arrays is connected to the AC subsystem via DC/AC inverters. The AC and DC buses are interlinked through bidirectional AC/DC converters that transfer power between the two subsystems and regulate the bus voltage amplitudes. The NG is connected with the higher-level MG on the AC side. Most NGs, conceived as the evolution of an existing part of a legacy AC grid, are characterized by a hybrid topology, allowing us to take advantage of the DC distribution while maintaining the possibility to power AC loads and to exchange energy with an upper-level distribution grid (usually in AC). The architecture of a power system impacts its scalability, reliability, robustness, resilience, and cost. This means that it is possible to draw another classification for MGs and NGs considering the type of bus used for power distribution. An interesting comparative analysis of DC MG architectures which can be extended to AC and hybrid MGs and NGs was given in [33]. Here single-bus (Figure 2a,b), multi-terminal (Figure 2c), ladder-bus (Figure 2d), ring bus (Figure 2e) and zonal-bus (Figure 2f) structures are compared in terms of bus voltage levels, BESS connection, inherent stability, expandability to multiple buses, and reliability. Each of these solutions has its strengths and drawbacks, and more research in this area is necessary to reduce their complexity level and solve extant problems. However, in the absence of standardization, numerous optimal system architectures can be defined in relation to the chosen physical variables and to the requirements of the loads.
Sustainability 15 02759 g002a 550Sustainability 15 02759 g002b 550
Figure 2.
DC NG classification based on bus structure: single-bus (
a
,
b
), multi- terminal (
c
), ladder-bus (
d
), ring-bus (
e
), zonal-bus (
f
).

References

  1. Boroyevich, D.; Cvetkovic, I.; Burgos, R.; Dong, D. Intergrid: A future electronic energy network? IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. 2013, 1, 127–138.
  2. Burmester, D.; Rayudu, R.; Seah, W.; Akinyele, D. A review of nanogrid topologies and technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 67, 760–775.
  3. Nordman, B.; Christensen, K.; Teleke, S.; Oehlerking, L.; Hong, M. Local power distribution with nanogrids. In Proceedings of the International Green Computing Conference Proceedings, IGCC 2013, Arlington, VA, USA, 27–29 June 2013.
  4. Teleke, S.; Oehlerking, L.; Hong, M. Nanogrids with energy storage for future electricity grids. In Proceedings of the IEEE PES T&D Conference and Exposition, Chicago, IL, USA, 14–17 April 2014.
  5. Boroyevich, D.; Cvetković, I.; Dong, D.; Burgos, R.; Wang, F.; Lee, F. Future electronic power distribution systems—A contemplative view. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Optimisation of Electrical and Electronic Equipment, OPTIM, Brasov, Romania, 20–22 May 2010.
  6. Justo, J.J.; Mwasilu, F.; Lee, J.; Jung, J.W. AC-microgrids versus DC-microgrids with distributed energy resources: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 24, 387–405.
  7. Nguyen, M.Y.; Yoon, Y.T. A comparison of microgrid topologies considering both market operations and reliability. Electr. Power Compon. Syst. 2014, 42, 585–594.
  8. Karabiber, A.; Keles, C.; Kaygusuz, A.; Alagoz, B.B. An approach for the integration of renewable distributed generation in hybrid DC/AC microgrids. Renew. Energy 2013, 52, 251–259.
  9. Salomonsson, D.; Sannino, A. Low-voltage DC distribution system for commercial power systems with sensitive electronic loads. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2007, 22, 1620–1627.
  10. Nordman, B.; Christensen, K.; Meier, A. Think globally, distribute power locally: The promise of nanogrids. Computer 2012, 45, 89–91.
  11. Werth, A.; Kitamura, N.; Tanaka, K. Conceptual study for open energy systems: Distributed energy network using interconnected DC nanogrids. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2015, 6, 1621–1630.
  12. Sulzberger, C.L. Triumph of AC. 2. The battle of the currents. IEEE Power Energy Mag. 2003, 99, 70–73.
  13. Sulzberger, C.L. Triumph of AC—From Pearl Street to Niagara. IEEE Power Energy Mag. 2003, 1, 64–67.
  14. Asad, R.; Kazemi, A. A quantitative analysis of effects of transition from AC to DC system, on storage and distribution systems. In Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference, Shanghai, China, 27–29 March 2012.
  15. Dragicevic, T.; Vasquez, J.; Guerrero, J.; Škrlec, D. Advanced LVDC electrical power architectures and microgrids. IEEE Electrif. Mag. 2014, 2, 54–65.
  16. Stippich, A.; Sewergin, A.; Engelmann, G.; Gottschlich, J.; Neubert, M.; van der Broeck, C.; Schülting, P.; Goldbeck, R.; de Doncker, R.W. From Ac to Dc: Demonstration of benefits in household appliances. In Proceedings of the International ETG Congress 2017—Die Energiewende, Bonn, Germany, 28–29 November 2017; pp. 422–427.
  17. Kumar, R.; Behera, R.K. A Low cost distributed solar DC nanogrid: Design and deployment with remote monitoring unit. In Proceedings of the 20th National Power Systems Conference (NPSC), Tiruchirappalli, India, 14–16 December 2018; pp. 1–6.
  18. Rodriguez-Diaz, E.; Vasquez, J.C.; Guerrero, J.M. Intelligent DC homes in future sustainable energy systems: When efficiency and intelligence work together. IEEE Consum. Electron. Mag. 2016, 5, 74–80.
  19. Starke, M.; Li, F.; Tolbert, L.M.; Ozpineci, B. AC vs. DC distribution: Maximum transfer capability. In Proceedings of the IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting—Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 20–24 July 2008.
  20. Moussa, S.; Ghorbal, M.J.B.; Slama-Belkhodja, I. Bus voltage level choice for standalone residential DC nanogrid. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019, 46, 101431.
  21. Khan, A.; Shadmand, M.B.; Bayhan, S.; Abu-Rub, H. A power ripple compensator for DC nanogrids via a solid-state converter. IEEE Open J. Ind. Electron. Soc. 2020, 1, 311–325.
  22. Sabry, A.H.; Shallal, A.H.; Hameed, H.S.; Ker, P.J. Compatibility of household appliances with DC microgrid for PV systems. Heliyon 2020, 6, e05699.
  23. Rahman, F.A.; James, R.; Jose, S.; Ahmed, S.; Mohammed, M.S.A.; Kunju, K.B. Solar DC homes: Energy for all. In Proceedings of the TENCON 2019—2019 IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON), Kochi, India, 17–20 October 2019; pp. 2428–2432.
  24. Joseph, S.C.; Ashok, S.; Dhanesh, P.R. An effective method of power management in DC nanogrid for building application. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Informatics, Communication and Energy Systems, SPICES 2017, Kollam, India, 8–10 August 2017.
  25. Weiss, R.; Ott, L.; Boeke, U. Energy efficient low-voltage DC-grids for commercial buildings. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 1st International Conference on Direct Current Microgrids, ICDCM 2015, Atlanta, GA, USA, 7–10 June 2015.
  26. Wu, X.; Wang, Z.; Ding, T.; Li, Z. Hybrid AC/DC microgrid planning with optimal placement of DC feeders. Energies 2019, 12, 1751.
  27. Goud, P.C.D.; Gupta, R. Solar PV based nanogrid integrated with battery energy storage to supply hybrid residential loads using single-stage hybrid converter. IET Energy Syst. Integr. 2020, 2, 161–169.
  28. Bozchalui, M.C.; Sharma, R. Optimal operation of commercial building microgrids using multi-objective optimization to achieve emissions and efficiency targets. In Proceedings of the IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, San Diego, CA, USA, 22–26 July 2012; pp. 1–8.
  29. Lotfi, H.; Khodaei, A. Hybrid AC/DC microgrid planning. Energy 2017, 118, 37–46.
  30. Bouchekara, H.R.E.H.; Shahriar, M.S.; Irshad, U.B.; Sha, Y.A. Optimal sizing of hybrid photovoltaic/diesel/battery nanogrid using a parallel multiobjective PSO-based approach: Application to desert camping in Hafr Al-Batin City in Saudi Arabia. Energy Rep. 2021, 7, 4360–4375.
  31. Dahiru, A.T.; Tan, C.W.; Bukar, A.L.; Yiew Lau, K. Energy cost reduction in residential nanogrid under constraints of renewable energy, customer demand fitness and binary battery operations. J. Energy Storage 2021, 39, 102520.
  32. Shahidehpour, M.; Li, Z.; Gong, W.; Bahramirad, S.; Lopata, M. A hybrid Ac\/Dc nanogrid: The keating hall installation at the illinois institute of technology. IEEE Electrif. Mag. 2017, 5, 36–46.
  33. Kumar, J.; Agarwal, A.; Agarwal, V. A Review on Overall Control of DC Microgrids. J. Energy Storage 2019, 21, 113–138.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback