Radiation Treatment Adaptation for Head and Neck Cancers: Comparison
Please note this is a comparison between Version 1 by Danny Lavigne and Version 2 by Dean Liu.

Radiation therapy plays a substantial role in the treatment of patients with head and neck cancer. Although there has been remarkable advances in radiation therapy techniques over the years, many patients still experience significant treatment toxicities, and several will unfortunately develop cancer recurrence. As head and neck cancers are widely heterogeneous, one approach that may improve outcomes is treatment adaptation to the anatomical or functional changes that occur during the course of therapy. RThis researchers concludeview describes the current and upcoming literature on radiation therapy treatment adaptation for patients with head and neck cancer, with an emphasis on the added value of magnetic resonance imaging.

  • radiation therapy
  • head and neck cancer
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • treatment adaptation

1. Computed Tomography-Based Treatment Adaptation

As head and neck cancer patients undergo their 6 to 7 weeks of daily radiation treatments, weight loss and tumor response often lead to notable anatomical changes. These changes may lead to the migration of organs at risk such as the parotids and pharyngeal constrictor muscles to high dose regions, resulting in an unplanned overdosage and potentially worse predicted chronic xerostomia[1][2][3]. Intended target volumes may also be at risk of inadequate coverage, possibly jeopardizing local control[4]. In a small prospective trial evaluating the need for replanning at weeks 3 and 6 during the course of radiation therapy (RT), computed tomography (CT)-based adaptive RT reduced doses to the spinal cord, avoided overdosage of the parotids and improved target coverage and homogeneity[5]. A second prospective trial by Schwartz et al. confirmed the reduction in mean parotid dose with CT-based adaptive RT[6]. One properly timed replanning seemed to deliver most of these dosimetric improvements. CT-based replanning is now standard for head and neck cancers and is usually done once the anatomical changes noted on the daily cone-beam CT seem important enough to significantly alter the initial dosimetry.

2. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Treatment Adaptation

2.1. Anatomical Adaptation

Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has now been widely adopted during the treatment planning of many head and neck cancers, its superiority in describing local extension and nodal disease has potential uses for RT beyond initial baseline evaluation, notably the opportunity for adaptive planning.
For its many advantages in the head and neck region, repeated MRI during the course of radiotherapy could further improve treatment adaptation by allowing better visualization of the tumor response and optimal target volume delineation. Subesinghe et al. reported a significant tumor shrinkage as early as by the 11th treatment fraction for head and neck cancer patients treated with RT, while Ding et al. found a complete response rate as high as 50% by mid-treatment for patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal cancer (OPC)[7][8]. The latter study also demonstrated that the volume change happens early for the primary tumor, whereas the trajectory of nodal disease shrinkage is more linear[8]. Such important tumor responses, especially early during the treatment course, raise the question of whether maintaining the initially planned gross tumor volume (GTV) is necessary, or if these early-responding patients are being overtreated with a consequent unnecessary risk of toxicity. The accuracy of the initial dosimetry plan may also be questioned given the anatomical changes. In that sense, a prospective in silico study from the MD Anderson MRLinac Development Working Group showed that response-based biweekly MR-guided adaptive RT for HPV-related OPC patients could reduce the probability of chronic dysphagia by 11% and the mean parotid dose by 3.3 Gy in comparison to standard intensity-modulated RT (IMRT). They also showed that the GTV volume decreased on average by 44, 90 and 100% at weeks 2, 4 and 6, respectively, while the nodal volumes decreased by 25, 60 and 80% during the same period[9].
Although these results are very promising for the reduction of toxicities for these patients, randomized data are needed to prove the safety and clinical benefit of MRI-based adaptive RT. In particular, the impact on local control of reducing target volumes to only the shrinking MRI-visible disease must be assessed, since tumors could potentially be dissolving instead of shrinking, leaving behind microscopic disease in areas previously occupied by tumor. Fortunately, several prospective randomized and single-arm clinical trials investigating the benefit and safety of MR-guided RT (MRgRT) are currently ongoing. MR-ADAPTOR is an R-IDEAL stage 2a–2b/Bayesian phase II trial led by the MD Anderson Cancer Center. The first stage of the trial will enroll 15 low-risk HPV-positive OPC patients to MRgRT dose adaptation with a weekly MRI-based RT replan before enrolling 60 additional patients randomized to either MRgRT or standard IMRT, with their primary outcome being locoregional control (LRC)[10]. ART-OPC is another phase II randomized trial currently recruiting and aiming to enroll 120 patients with advanced OPC who will be randomized to either standard IMRT or MRgRT with a single MRI-based RT replan on week 3 of treatments. This trial is assessing the rates of chronic dysphagia, toxicities, LRC, overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QoL) associated with this novel technique[11]. The MARTHA trial is a phase II single arm trial recruiting patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers to assess the rate of xerostomia associated with daily imaging for MRgRT and once weekly offline plan adaptation[12]. The INSIGHT-2 trial is a phase I/II single arm trial also recruiting advanced head and neck cancer patients, aiming to assess the feasibility and safety of MR-guided adaptive RT at weeks 2 and 4 and, for HPV-negative patients, dose escalation at week 2 according to response identified on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)[13].

2.2. Functional Adaptation

This last trial highlights another potential role for MRI in adaptive planning beyond the assessment of anatomical changes during treatments, which is the opportunity for functional adaptation. It is now well known that head and neck cancers are widely heterogeneous with an obvious example being HPV-associated OPC, which is associated with a significantly better prognosis and a greater response to therapy[14]. For this reason, in the past decade, much effort has extended towards tailoring treatments to individual patients to enhance control of more resistant tumors (treatment escalation), and to reduce treatment toxicities for patients with better responding tumors (treatment de-escalation). DWI-guided treatment adaptation was also investigated in a phase II randomized clinical trial for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal cancers, where patients received either standard IMRT or dose-painted dose-escalation to tumor regions showing lower apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on DWI. This experimental technique showed promising results with an improved 2-year disease-free survival of 93.6% vs. 87.5% for standard IMRT (p = 0.015), with no change in acute treatment toxicities[15].

2.3. Hypofractionation

MRgRT is also promising in the era of personalized treatments by allowing precise delineation of target and normal tissue volumes for every delivered fraction. This provides an opportunity to investigate and use hypofractionation and stereotactic ablative RT (SABR), which was not previously possible in head and neck cancers due to the presence of highly vulnerable organs in immediate proximity to tumor targets. Hypofractionation is currently being investigated in the phase I DEHART trial, including head and neck cancer patients unfit for chemoradiation who will receive 40 Gy in 15 fractions to elective low-risk regions and 50–60 Gy in 15 fractions to the GTV, with MR-guided volume adaptation at fractions 6 and 11, followed by adjuvant immunotherapy[16]. SHORT-OPC is an ongoing phase II randomized trial for HPV-associated OPC patients, who will receive either standard chemoradiation over 7 weeks or 40 Gy in 20 fractions to elective regions with a SABR boost of 14 Gy in 2 fractions to the GTV. The study is investigating the LRC, toxicity, OS, progression-free survival and QoL of this novel technique[17].


  1. Choonik Lee; Katja M. Langen; Weiguo Lu; Jason Haimerl; Eric Schnarr; Kenneth J. Ruchala; Gustavo H. Olivera; Sanford L. Meeks; Patrick A. Kupelian; Thomas D. Shellenberger; et al.Rafael R. Mañon Assessment of Parotid Gland Dose Changes During Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy Using Daily Megavoltage Computed Tomography and Deformable Image Registration. International Journal of Radiation Oncology - Biology - Physics 2008, 71, 1563-1571, 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.013.
  2. Joel Castelli; Antoine Simon; Guillaume Louvel; Olivier Henry; Enrique Chajon; Mohamed Nassef; Pascal Haigron; Guillaume Cazoulat; Juan David Ospina; Franck Jegoux; et al.Karen BenezeryRenaud De Crevoisier Impact of head and neck cancer adaptive radiotherapy to spare the parotid glands and decrease the risk of xerostomia. Radiation Oncology 2015, 10, 1-10, 10.1186/s13014-014-0318-z.
  3. Jakub Grepl; Igor Sirak; Milan Vosmik; Ales Tichy; The Changes in Pharyngeal Constrictor Muscles Related to Head and Neck Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review. Technology in cancer research & treatment 2019, 19, 1, 10.1177/1533033820945805.
  4. Allen M. Chen; Megan E. Daly; Jing Cui; Mathew Mathai; Stanley Benedict; James A. Purdy; Clinical outcomes among patients with head and neck cancer treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy with and without adaptive replanning. Head & Neck 2014, 36, 1541-1546, 10.1002/hed.23477.
  5. Omar Mahmoud; Isildinha M. Reis; Michael M. Samuels; Nagy Elsayyad; Elizabeth Bossart; Joseph Both; Ehsan Elghoneimy; Magda Moustafa; Mohamed Abdallah; Cristiane Takita; et al. Prospective Pilot Study Comparing the Need for Adaptive Radiotherapy in Unresected Bulky Disease and in Postoperative Patients With Head and Neck Cancer. Technology in cancer research & treatment 2017, 16, 1014-1021, 10.1177/1533034617717624.
  6. David L. Schwartz; Adam S. Garden; Jimmy Thomas; Yipei Chen; Yongbin Zhang; Jan Lewin; Mark S. Chambers; Lei Dong; Adaptive Radiotherapy for Head-and-Neck Cancer: Initial Clinical Outcomes From a Prospective Trial. International Journal of Radiation Oncology - Biology - Physics 2011, 83, 986-993, 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.08.017.
  7. Manil Subesinghe; Andrew F Scarsbrook; Steven Sourbron; Daniel J Wilson; Garry McDermott; Richard Speight; Neil Roberts; Brendan Carey; Roan Forrester; Sandeep Vijaya Gopal; et al.Jonathan R SykesRobin J D Prestwich Alterations in anatomic and functional imaging parameters with repeated FDG PET-CT and MRI during radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: a pilot study.. BMC Cancer 2015, 15, 137, 10.1186/s12885-015-1154-8.
  8. Yao Ding; John D. Hazle; Abdallah S. R. Mohamed; Steven J. Frank; Brian P. Hobbs; Rivka R. Colen; G. Brandon Gunn; Jihong Wang; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Adam Garden; et al.Stephen LaiDavid RosenthalClifton D. Fuller Intravoxel incoherent motion imaging kinetics during chemoradiotherapy for human papillomavirus-associated squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx: preliminary results from a prospective pilot study. NMR in Biomedicine 2015, 28, 1645-1654, 10.1002/nbm.3412.
  9. Abdallah S.R. Mohamed; Houda Bahig; Michalis Aristophanous; Pierre Blanchard; Mona Kamal; Yao Ding; Carlos Cardenas; Kristy K. Brock; Stephen Y. Lai; Katherine A. Hutcheson; et al.Jack PhanJihong WangGeoffrey IbbottRefaat E. GabrPonnada A. NarayanaAdam GardenDavid I. RosenthalG. Brandon GunnClifton D. Fuller Prospective in silico study of the feasibility and dosimetric advantages of MRI-guided dose adaptation for human papillomavirus positive oropharyngeal cancer patients compared with standard IMRT. Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology 2018, 11, 11-18, 10.1016/j.ctro.2018.04.005.
  10. Houda Bahig; Ying Yuan; Abdallah Mohamed; Kristy K. Brock; Sweet Ping Ng; Jihong Wang; Yao Ding; Kate Hutcheson; Molly McCulloch; Peter A. Balter; et al.Stephen Y. LaiAbrahim Al-MamganiJan-Jakob SonkeUulke A. van der HeideChristopher NuttingX. Allen LiJared RobbinsMussadiq AwanIrene KaramKatherine NewboldKevin HarringtonUwe OelfkeShreerang BhideMarielle E.P. PhilippensChris H.J. TerhaardAndrew J. McPartlinPierre BlanchardAdam GardenDavid I. RosenthalG. Brandon GunnJack PhanGuillaume CazoulatMichalis AristophanousKelli K. McSpaddenJohn A. GarciaCornelis A.T. Van Den BergCornelis P.J. RaaijmakersLinda KerkmeijerPatricia DoornaertSanne BlindeSteven J. FrankClifton D. Fuller Magnetic Resonance-based Response Assessment and Dose Adaptation in Human Papilloma Virus Positive Tumors of the Oropharynx treated with Radiotherapy (MR-ADAPTOR): An R-IDEAL stage 2a-2b/Bayesian phase II trial. Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology 2018, 13, 19-23, 10.1016/j.ctro.2018.08.003.
  11. Adaptive Radio Therapy for OroPharynx Cancer (ART-OPC). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04901234. . ClinicalTrials.gov. Retrieved 2022-11-11
  12. MRI—Guided Adaptive RadioTHerapy for Reducing XerostomiA in Head and Neck Cancer (MARTHA-Trial). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03972072 . ClinicalTrials.gov. Retrieved 2022-11-11
  13. Optimising Radiation Therapy in Head and Neck Cancers Using Functional Image-Guided Radiotherapy and Novel Biomarkers (INSIGHT-2). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04242459 . ClinicalTrials.gov. Retrieved 2022-11-11
  14. Thomas J. Galloway; Qiang (Ed) Zhang; Phuc Felix Nguyen-Tan; David I. Rosenthal; Denis Soulieres; André Fortin; Craig L. Silverman; Megan E. Daly; John A. Ridge; J. Alexander Hammond; et al.Quynh-Thu Le Prognostic Value of p16 Status on the Development of a Complete Response in Involved Oropharynx Cancer Neck Nodes After Cisplatin-Based Chemoradiation: A Secondary Analysis of NRG Oncology RTOG 0129. International Journal of Radiation Oncology - Biology - Physics 2016, 96, 362-371, 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.05.026.
  15. Shengnan Fu; Yanxian Li; Yaqian Han; Hui Wang; Yanzhu Chen; Ouying Yan; Qian He; Hongzhi Ma; Lin Liu; Feng Liu; et al. Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Dose Painting in Patients With Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated With Induction Chemotherapy Plus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial. International Journal of Radiation Oncology - Biology - Physics 2022, 113, 101-113, 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.12.175.
  16. Dose-Escalated Hypofractionated Adaptive Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer (DEHART). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04477759 . ClinicalTrials.gov. Retrieved 2022-11-11
  17. Stereotactic Boost and Short-Course Radiation Therapy for Oropharynx Cancer (SHORT-OPC). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04178174 . ClinicalTrials.gov. Retrieved 2022-11-11
Video Production Service