Dialysis as a Cancer Treatment: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Sirius Huang and Version 1 by Viktoria Roos.

Cancer metabolism is characterized by an increased utilization of fermentable fuels, such as glucose and glutamine, which support cancer cell survival by increasing resistance to both oxidative stress and the inherent immune system in humans. Dialysis has the power to shift the patient from a state dependent on glucose and glutamine to a ketogenic condition (KC) combined with low glutamine levels—thereby forcing ATP production through the Krebs cycle. By the force of dialysis, the cancer cells will be deprived of their preferred fermentable fuels, disrupting major metabolic pathways important for the ability of the cancer cells to survive. 

  • dialysis
  • HDAC
  • ketone bodies
  • immunotherapies
  • radiotherapies
  • chemotherapies
  • redox balance
  • cancer

1. Introduction

Reprogramming of energy metabolism is a hallmark of cancer cells [1], which is well known to support their rapid proliferation. Survival is an evident cancer cell need and four major metabolic changes related to survival have been identified: first, glycolysis is increased and has been shown to support the reduction of oxidative stress through multiple pathways linked to glycolysis; second, glutaminolysis has been shown to fuel other metabolic pathways also essential for the reduction of oxidative stress; third, both glycolysis and glutaminolysis fuel pathways that support the suppression of the host’s immune system in the tumor micro environment (TME), essential for cancer survival; and fourth, histone de-acetylases (HDAC) has been shown to be overexpressed in cancer cells and linked to cancer survival by improving the resilience of malignant cells to apoptosis and inducing immune suppression.
Ketone bodies serve as an excellent energy fuel for healthy cells and are primarily used for ATP production through the Krebs cycle in the mitochondria, utilizing OXPHOS and oxygen when other energy sources are limited. This stands in contrast to glucose and glutamine, which can be anaerobically used for numerous metabolites important for cancer survival and progression including energy production (ATP) [2,3,4,5][2][3][4][5]. Interestingly, ketone bodies have been shown to be inhibitors of class I and IIa HDACs and reduce several epigenetic alterations important for cancer survival [6,7,8][6][7][8].
Many cancers have a very short long-term survival rate, the 5-year survival rate is <10% for glioblastoma [9] and pancreatic cancer [10]. For most advanced cancers, therapy resistance limits the benefit of any single-agent chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or immunotherapy [11,12,13,14,15][11][12][13][14][15]. Therefore, some 5000 clinical trials are ongoing globally to probe the clinical benefit of new combination treatments [16]. The cancer cell resistance towards TCT has many causes [11,17,18][11][17][18]. An important one is the plasticity of tumor cells that may lead to the development of drug resistance, and therefore, the need for new cancer therapies targeting a multitude of mechanisms [16].
The novel concept described herein suggests using dialysis, to reduce levels of both glucose and glutamine, as an adjuvant cancer treatment to increase efficiency and reduce side effects of traditional cancer treatments (TCTs). The goal with the suggested dialysis treatment is to timely shift the patient’s metabolic state, usually depending on glucose and glutamine, to another physiological state (ketogenic condition (KC) and low glutamine levels)—where all cells, including tumor cells, mainly must depend on ketone bodies for their cell energy metabolism. Such a dialysis treatment will induce a potentially harmful metabolic condition for cancer cells, mimicking the physiological KC obtained after fasting for many days or even weeks [19,20][19][20].
Dialysis is able to decrease the systemic levels of glucose and glutamine, two main nutrients, essential for cancer cell survival and proliferation, and at the same time support increased ketone bodies in the blood to secure metabolites for non-cancer cell ATP need through OXPHOS (Figure 1) [4,21,22,23,24][4][21][22][23][24].
Figure 1. Graphs outlining the possible differences between the metabolite levels achieved over time from (A) a ketogenic diet [26,28][25][26] or fast [20,29][20][27], and from (B) dialysis. A comparably short dialysis treatment would shift the patient to a ketogenic metabolic condition, where high ketone and low glutamine levels will be unfavorable for cancer cells, but not healthy cells. A short dialysis treatment shifts the patient from one metabolic condition to another, unfavorable for the cancer but not for the patient as a whole.
To achieve a ketogenic condition with low glutamine levels, in conjunction with TCT, may boost the effectiveness of those treatments in similar ways as ketogenic diet and/or different types of glycolysis or glutaminolysis inhibitors are known to do [4,5,25][4][5][28].
Notably, a strict ketogenic diet would need to be maintained for days or even weeks and would naturally lead to a less pronounced metabolic shift (Figure 1) [19,20,26][19][20][25]. Additionally, several studies have shown that ketogenic diet has very poor cancer patient compliance and is hard to follow over time [19,27][19][29]. Dialysis, however, will have the power to create a significantly more prominent and well-defined metabolic shift compared with that of the ketogenic diet—and thus a more pronounced clinical effect (Figure 1) [28][26].
With the exception of lipids, all metabolic fuels in the human blood such as glucose, ketone bodies (KB), lactate, and amino acids (AAs), are small water-soluble substances that can be readily exchanged during dialysis. With dialysis, glucose [22] and glutamine [21] levels will be reduced, and simultaneous addition of KB (orally, intravenously, or by adding them to the dialysis fluid), could increase KB levels within a range of 2–8 mmol/L in blood [30] within one to two hours. Notably, ketoacidosis is a serious side effect of ketogenesis (not the presence of KB per se) that mainly occurs in type 1 diabetes. Ketoacidosis will not be induced when external KB is supplied [31]—thus avoiding this unwanted side effect.

2. Dialysis as a Cancer Treatment

Abnormal metabolism in cancer cells has been observed for close to a century and is today after almost 100 years recognized as a hallmark of cancer [1]. Cancer cells rewire their metabolism, and two common features of this altered metabolism are increased dependence on glucose and glutamine; exactly how and why cancer cells do this is not fully resolved. Nonetheless, this metabolic rewiring has multiple functions in cancer, including bolstering of cancer cell survival—resulting in an increased resistance to TCTs. By changing the metabolite levels with dialysis as suggested, the cancer environment will change and consequently several anticipated anti-cancerogenic effects may occur (Figure 2). Thus, the changes imposed by dialysis may amplify the effectiveness of TCT. Increased KBs and reduced glucose and glutamine levels may increase the cancer cell’s dependency on mitochondrial ATP production and reduce the ability to handle oxidative stress by upregulating the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), the one carbon metabolism (1CM), and glutaminolysis [4,5,23,24,32][4][5][23][24][32]. Reduced glucose and glutamine levels and increased ketone body metabolism lead to increased mitochondrial ATP production and have been shown to reduce oxidative stress in healthy cells [32,33,34][32][33][34] and increase oxidative stress in cancer [2,34,35,36][2][34][35][36]. By reducing lactate and increasing pH in the TME, the immunologic response to cancer cells may increase [37,38][37][38]. Furthermore, KBs have, at physiological levels (typical for fasting), been shown to inhibit HDAC class I and class IIa, and many cancers show an increased expression of these HDACs [6,8,39,40,41][6][8][39][40][41].
Figure 2.
Suggested effects of CancerDialysis on the efficacy of TCT. (↑) indicates an increase and (↓) indicates a decrease.
Consequently, to force KC by dialysis during a four-to-eight-hour treatment will induce a multitude of changes potentially harmful for cancer—and if done in conjunction with TCTs, potentially augment their efficacy.

References

  1. Hanahan, D. Hallmarks of Cancer: New Dimensions. Cancer Discov. 2022, 12, 31–46.
  2. Feng, S.; Wang, H.; Liu, J.; Aa, J.; Zhou, F.; Wang, G. Multi-dimensional roles of ketone bodies in cancer biology: Opportunities for cancer therapy. Pharmacol. Res. 2019, 150, 104500.
  3. Chinopoulos, C.; Seyfried, T.N. Mitochondrial Substrate-Level Phosphorylation as Energy Source for Glioblastoma: Review and Hypothesis. ASN Neuro 2018, 10, 1759091418818261.
  4. Seyfried, T.N.; Mukherjee, P.; Iyikesici, M.S.; Slocum, A.; Kalamian, M.; Spinosa, J.P.; Chinopoulos, C. Consideration of Ketogenic Metabolic Therapy as a Complementary or Alternative Approach for Managing Breast Cancer. Front. Nutr. 2020, 7, 21.
  5. Seyfried, T.N.; Chinopoulos, C. Can the Mitochondrial Metabolic Theory Explain Better the Origin and Management of Cancer than Can the Somatic Mutation Theory? Metabolites 2021, 11, 572.
  6. Shimazu, T.; Hirschey, M.D.; Newman, J.; He, W.; Shirakawa, K.; Le Moan, N.; Grueter, C.A.; Lim, H.; Saunders, L.R.; Stevens, R.D.; et al. Suppression of oxidative stress by beta-hydroxybutyrate, an endogenous histone deacetylase inhibitor. Science 2013, 339, 211–214.
  7. Kinnaird, A.; Zhao, S.; Wellen, K.E.; Michelakis, E.D. Metabolic control of epigenetics in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2016, 16, 694–707.
  8. Mikami, D.; Kobayashi, M.; Uwada, J.; Yazawa, T.; Kamiyama, K.; Nishimori, K.; Nishikawa, Y.; Nishikawa, S.; Yokoi, S.; Taniguchi, T.; et al. beta-Hydroxybutyrate enhances the cytotoxic effect of cisplatin via the inhibition of HDAC/survivin axis in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2020, 142, 1–8.
  9. Delgado-Lopez, P.D.; Corrales-Garcia, E.M. Survival in glioblastoma: A review on the impact of treatment modalities. Clin. Transl. Oncol. 2016, 18, 1062–1071.
  10. Mizrahi, J.D.; Surana, R.; Valle, J.W.; Shroff, R.T. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet 2020, 395, 2008–2020.
  11. Bansal, A.; Simon, M.C. Glutathione metabolism in cancer progression and treatment resistance. J. Cell Biol. 2018, 217, 2291–2298.
  12. Schaue, D.; McBride, W.H. Opportunities and challenges of radiotherapy for treating cancer. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2015, 12, 527–540.
  13. Jarosz-Biej, M.; Smolarczyk, R.; Cichon, T.; Kulach, N. Tumor Microenvironment as A “Game Changer” in Cancer Radiotherapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3212.
  14. Zhou, W.; Wahl, D.R. Metabolic Abnormalities in Glioblastoma and Metabolic Strategies to Overcome Treatment Resistance. Cancers 2019, 11, 1231.
  15. Shi, R.; Tang, Y.Q.; Miao, H. Metabolism in tumor microenvironment: Implications for cancer immunotherapy. Med. Comm. 2020, 1, 47–68.
  16. Boshuizen, J.; Peeper, D.S. Rational Cancer Treatment Combinations: An Urgent Clinical Need. Mol. Cell 2020, 78, 1002–1018.
  17. Mansoori, B.; Mohammadi, A.; Davudian, S.; Shirjang, S.; Baradaran, B. The Different Mechanisms of Cancer Drug Resistance: A Brief Review. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2017, 7, 339–348.
  18. Wang, H.; Jiang, H.; Van de Gucht, M.; De Ridder, M. Hypoxic Radioresistance: Can ROS Be the Key to Overcome It? Cancers 2019, 11, 112.
  19. Zahra, A.; Fath, M.A.; Opat, E.; Mapuskar, K.A.; Bhatia, S.K.; Ma, D.C.; Rodman, S.N., III; Snyders, T.P.; Chenard, C.A.; Eichenberger-Gilmore, J.M.; et al. Consuming a Ketogenic Diet while Receiving Radiation and Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Lung Cancer and Pancreatic Cancer: The University of Iowa Experience of Two Phase 1 Clinical Trials. Radiat. Res. 2017, 187, 743–754.
  20. Owen, O.E.; Felig, P.; Morgan, A.P.; Wahren, J.; Cahill, G.F., Jr. Liver and kidney metabolism during prolonged starvation. J. Clin. Investig. 1969, 48, 574–583.
  21. Ikizler, T.A. Amino acid and albumin losses during hemodialysis. Kidney Int. 1994, 46, 830–837.
  22. Abe, M.; Kalantar-Zadeh, K. Haemodialysis-induced hypoglycaemia and glycaemic disarrays. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2015, 11, 302–313.
  23. Gorrini, C.; Harris, I.S.; Mak, T.W. Modulation of oxidative stress as an anticancer strategy. Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov. 2013, 12, 931–947.
  24. Mathews, E.H.; Stander, B.A.; Joubert, A.M.; Liebenberg, L. Tumor cell culture survival following glucose and glutamine deprivation at typical physiological concentrations. Nutrition 2014, 30, 218–227.
  25. Phillips, M.C.L.; Murtagh, D.K.J.; Gilbertson, L.J.; Asztely, F.J.S.; Lynch, C.D.P. Low-fat versus ketogenic diet in Parkinson’s disease: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Mov. Disord. 2018, 33, 1306–1314.
  26. Poff, A.M.; Ari, C.; Arnold, P.; Seyfried, T.N.; D’Agostino, D.P. Ketone supplementation decreases tumor cell viability and prolongs survival of mice with metastatic cancer. Int. J. Cancer 2014, 135, 1711–1720.
  27. Pan, J.W.; Rothman, T.L.; Behar, K.L.; Stein, D.T.; Hetherington, H.P. Human brain beta-hydroxybutyrate and lactate increase in fasting-induced ketosis. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2000, 20, 1502–1507.
  28. Alidadi, M.; Banach, M.; Guest, P.C.; Bo, S.; Jamialahmadi, T.; Sahebkar, A. The effect of caloric restriction and fasting on cancer. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2021, 73, 30–44.
  29. Klement, R.J. The emerging role of ketogenic diets in cancer treatment. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2019, 22, 129–134.
  30. Stubbs, B.J.; Cox, P.J.; Evans, R.D.; Santer, P.; Miller, J.J.; Faull, O.K.; Magor-Elliott, S.; Hiyama, S.; Stirling, M.; Clarke, K. On the Metabolism of Exogenous Ketones in Humans. Front. Physiol. 2017, 8, 848.
  31. Green, A.; Bishop, R.E. Ketoacidosis—Where Do the Protons Come From? Trends Biochem. Sci. 2019, 44, 484–489.
  32. De Santis, M.C.; Porporato, P.E.; Martini, M.; Morandi, A. Signaling Pathways Regulating Redox Balance in Cancer Metabolism. Front. Oncol. 2018, 8, 126.
  33. Rojas-Morales, P.; Pedraza-Chaverri, J.; Tapia, E. Ketone bodies, stress response, and redox homeostasis. Redox Biol. 2020, 29, 101395.
  34. Allen, B.G.; Bhatia, S.K.; Anderson, C.M.; Eichenberger-Gilmore, J.M.; Sibenaller, Z.A.; Mapuskar, K.A.; Schoenfeld, J.D.; Buatti, J.M.; Spitz, D.R.; Fath, M.A. Ketogenic diets as an adjuvant cancer therapy: History and potential mechanism. Redox Biol. 2014, 2, 963–970.
  35. Bozzetti, F.; Zupec-Kania, B. Toward a cancer-specific diet. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 35, 1188–1195.
  36. Weber, D.D.; Aminzadeh-Gohari, S.; Tulipan, J.; Catalano, L.; Feichtinger, R.G.; Kofler, B. Ketogenic diet in the treatment of cancer—Where do we stand? Mol. Metab. 2019, 33, 102–121.
  37. Corbet, C.; Feron, O. Tumour acidosis: From the passenger to the driver’s seat. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2017, 17, 577–593.
  38. Cassim, S.; Pouyssegur, J. Tumor Microenvironment: A Metabolic Player that Shapes the Immune Response. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 21, 157.
  39. Grabacka, M.; Pierzchalska, M.; Dean, M.; Reiss, K. Regulation of Ketone Body Metabolism and the Role of PPARalpha. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 2093.
  40. Li, Y.; Seto, E. HDACs and HDAC Inhibitors in Cancer Development and Therapy. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect Med. 2016, 6, a026831.
  41. Ramaiah, M.J.; Tangutur, A.D.; Manyam, R.R. Epigenetic modulation and understanding of HDAC inhibitors in cancer therapy. Life Sci. 2021, 277, 119504.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Feedback