Effect of Sunscreen Ingredients in an Aquatic Environment: Comparison
Please note this is a comparison between Version 1 by Javier R. Viguri and Version 4 by Lindsay Dong.

Sunscreens have become a product based on increasingly complex formulations that include, among many ingredients, a mixture of UV filters to provide optimal sun ultraviolet radiation protection. A significant group of scientific works deals with the impact of UV filters in aquatic media. However, the knowledge of the mechanism and kinetics of the compound’s direct release, fate, and its transformation and interaction with living organisms is necessary to assess its environmental occurrence and behavior and to predict potential and real impacts on the aquatic environment. The physical‐chemical properties, photodegradation, and release kinetics of particles and chemicals into the water are studied by hydrodynamic and kinetic models. Direct photolysis of chemicals is modeled as pseudofirst‐order kinetics, while the indirect pathway by the reaction of sunscreen with reactive oxygen species is described as second‐order kinetics. The interaction of UV filters with marine biota is studied mainly by toxicokinetic models, which predict their bio‐accumulation in the organisms’ tissues. These models consider the chemicals’ uptake and excretion, as well as their transfer between different internal animal organs, as a first‐order kinetic process.

Sunscreens have become a product based on increasingly complex formulations that include,

among many ingredients, a mixture of UV filters to provide optimal sun ultraviolet radiation

protection. A significant group of scientific works deals with the impact of UV filters in aquatic

media. However, the knowledge of the mechanism and kinetics of the compound’s direct release,

fate, and its transformation and interaction with living organisms is necessary to assess its environmental

occurrence and behavior and to predict potential and real impacts on the aquatic environment.

This review outlines the existing analysis and modeling of the release and behavior of sunscreen’s

ingredients in the marine environment, including aquatic organisms. The physical‐chemical

properties, photodegradation, and release kinetics of particles and chemicals into the water are

studied by hydrodynamic and kinetic models. Direct photolysis of chemicals is modeled as pseudofirst‐

order kinetics, while the indirect pathway by the reaction of sunscreen with reactive oxygen

species is described as second‐order kinetics. The interaction of UV filters with marine biota is studied

mainly by toxicokinetic models, which predict their bio‐accumulation in the organisms’ tissues.

These models consider the chemicals’ uptake and excretion, as well as their transfer between different

internal animal organs, as a first‐order kinetic process. The studies analyzed in the present work

represent a driver of change for the beauty and personal care industry, in order to seek new ecological

alternatives through the application of R&D tactics.

  • sunscreen
  • chemicals
  • modelling
  • aquatic organism
  • accumulation

1. Introduction

1. Introduction

The analysis and modeling of the release, behavior, and fate of ingredients contained

in sunscreen products when they come into contact with seawater allow us to predict their

potential negative impacts on the marine environment. The development of a general

modeling method, which allows us to model these complex (from an environmental point

of view) matrices based on chemical cocktails, requires the minimization and management

of the effects caused by the use of sunscreens in aquatic ecosystems. In the present

work, we first present a brief perspective on sunscreen products. Secondly, we critically

review our current knowledge of models studied in the literature regarding the behavior

and transformation of these environmental harmful substances and their associated ingredients

in aquatic media. This review may represent an advance in the current state of

knowledge, given that it adds a different point of view on sunscreen release in aquatic

ecosystems, investigating the chemical behaviour of sunscreen compounds depending on

the experiments performed (in‐lab, in‐field, with organisms, without organisms). The

study also reports the mechanisms and kinetic models used, as well as the requirement

for the more precise and realistic modeling of skincare ingredients and, in general, for all

the emerging contaminants.

The analysis and modeling of the release, behavior, and fate of ingredients contained in sunscreen products when they come into contact with seawater allow scholars to predict their potential negative impacts on the marine environment. The development of a general modeling method, which allows scholars to model these complex (from an environmental point of view) matrices based on chemical cocktails, requires the minimization and management of the effects caused by the use of sunscreens in aquatic ecosystems.

2. Analysis and Modeling of the Behavior of Sunscreen’s Ingredients in an Aquatic

Environment in the Absence of Organisms

2. Analysis and Modeling of the Behavior of Sunscreen’s Ingredients in an Aquatic Environment in the Absence of Organisms

The behavior, transformation, aging, and modeling of sunscreen’s ingredients in the

aquatic environment in the absence of organisms were identified through a systematic

literature review.

A large number of studies focus on the concentration and fate of sunscreen ingredients in different environment scenarios that are commonly used for recreational activities, such as rivers, lakes, estuaries, and beaches. Laboratory experiments aim to propose reaction mechanisms and kinetic models to describe the physico‐chemical transformations of sunscreen ingredients under controlled conditions. The results of such studies can be inputs to the model applied to real environmental scenarios. These works are analyzed in the following sections in the present work with Figure 1 showing the modeled transformations related to the release and transformation of the sunscreen ingredients in the aquatic environment in laboratory‐scale studies. Several works modeled and determined the photodegradation kinetics in laboratory‐simulated environmental conditions of organic UV filters. Several scholars studied the physicochemical processes related to TiO2‐NPs degradation and aging in aquatic media during a contact time of up to seven days using aqueous solutions of TiO2‐NPs. Organic UV‐filter degradation in aqueous media in the presence of TiO2‐NPs and light, as well as the degradation of nanoparticle surface coatings, can generate nutrients as nitrogen compounds (NO2−, NO3−, NH4+), phosphorous compounds (PO43−), and SiO2, which can have a considerable environmental impact.

A large number of studies focus on the concentration and fate of sunscreen ingredients

in different environment scenarios that are commonly used for recreational activities,

such as rivers, lakes, estuaries, and beaches. Laboratory experiments aim to propose reaction mechanisms and kinetic models to

describe the physico‐chemical transformations of sunscreen ingredients under controlled

conditions. The results of such studies can be inputs to the model applied to real environmental

scenarios. These works are analyzed in the following sections in the present work with Figure

2 showing the modeled transformations related to the release and transformation of the

sunscreen ingredients in the aquatic environment in laboratory‐scale studies. Several works modeled and determined the photodegradation

kinetics in laboratory‐simulated environmental conditions of organic UV filters. Several authors studied the physicochemical processes related to TiO2‐NPs degradation

and aging in aquatic media during a contact time of up to seven days using aqueous

solutions of TiO2‐NPs. Organic UV‐filter degradation in aqueous media in the presence of TiO2‐NPs and

light, as well as the degradation of nanoparticle surface coatings, can generate nutrients

as nitrogen compounds (NO2−, NO3−, NH4+), phosphorous compounds (PO43−), and SiO2,

which can have a considerable environmental impact.

Figure 12. Superstructure of the sunscreen’s transformations in the environment.

3. Analysis and Modeling of the Behavior of Sunscreen Ingredients in Contact with Aquatic Organisms

Superstructure of the sunscreen’s transformations in the environment.

 

3. Analysis and Modeling of the Behavior of Sunscreen Ingredients in Contact with

Aquatic Organisms

The mechanism and mathematical models proposed to analyze and predict the compound’s

release, transformation, and interaction with living aquatic organisms were identified

through a systematic literature review.
Figure 2 schematically presented the processes that can be considered in the approach of these models. All the possible flows of the biokinetic models are presented in 
4 schematically presented the processes that can be considered in the approach of these models. All the possible flows of the biokinetic models are presented in 
Figure 2a. The uptake of the substance by the organism can be performed through the gills, when the substance is dissolved or in a colloidal form, or through the digestive system if it is associated with particles or food. Once in the organism, it can bioconcentrate and finally be excreted into the aquatic environment. Figure 2b illustrates the possible flows of matter considering a toxicokinetic model. The difference present in the biokinetic model is that it considers the flows of matter

within the organism, the bioconcentration of the substance in the different compartments, and the interrelation between them.
4a. The uptake of the substance by the organism can be performed through the gills, when the substance is dissolved or in a colloidal form, or through the digestive system if it is associated with particles or food. Once in the organism, it can bioconcentrate and finally be excreted into the aquatic environment. Figure 4b illustrates the possible flows of matter considering a toxicokinetic model. The difference present in the biokinetic model is that it considers the flows of matter

within the organism, the bioconcentration of the substance in the different compartments,

and the interrelation between them.
Figure 24.
 Processes of uptake, bioconcentration, and excretion of a substance by the aquatic organism. (
a
) Biokinetic model and (
b
) toxicokinetic model. 
Table 1 presents the different studies compiled from the bibliography that proposed the biokinetic models.
Table 3 presents the different studies compiled from the bibliography that proposed the biokinetic models.
Table 1. Biokinetic models used in different studies.

 

UV Filters/Metals

Water Type

Field/Laboratory

Reference

 

 

 

 

Mussel

4-MBC, BP3, BP4, OC, OD-PABA

Seawater

Laboratory

[1]

Fish

Cu

Fresh water

Laboratory

[2]

Mussel

EHMC

Seawater

Laboratory

[3]

Clams/mussels

Zn

Seawater

Field

[4]

 

 

 

 

Oysters/mussels/clams

Ag, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, Ti, Zn

Seawater

Field

[5]

Mussel

As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Se, Pb, Zn

Seawater

Laboratory

[6]

Clams

Ag, As, Zn

Seawater

Laboratory

[7]

Mussel

Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Zn

Fresh water

Field

[8]

Scallop

Cd, Zn

Seawater

Laboratory

[9]

Mussel

Ag, Am, Cd, Co, Se, Zn

Seawater

Field

[10]

 

 

 

 

Clams/prawns/whiting

Cd, Mn, Zn

Seawater

Laboratory

[11]

Oyster

Zn

Seawater

Laboratory

[12]

4. Conclusions

Sunscreen has become a product widely used by people all over the world, both in everyday life and associated with sun and beach tourism. Since its invention, it has evolved through different stages to achieve optimal protection against the entire UV spectrum with increasingly complex formulations. However, restrictions of the use of certain components, due to the impact produced by their release and transformation in an aquatic environment, is a driver for the design of environmentally friendly formulations. The analysis and modeling of the release and behavior of sunscreen ingredients into the marine environment, including aquatic organisms, allowed scholars to predict the fate and levels of the chemicals under study, and therefore allowed scholars to predict the potential negative impacts on the aquatic environment. A large group of models studied the behavior of the particles and chemicals released into the water by hydrodynamic and kinetic models in the laboratory, while the knowledge of the fate of sunscreen components in the real environment is still limited. The laboratory‐scale works analyzed and model: (i) the physical–chemical property behavior of sunscreens once they are incorporated into the aquatic environment, (ii) the photodegradation of sunscreen components, and (iii) the release kinetics of metals present in sunscreens and the formation of nutrients in the receiving aquatic environment. The direct photolysis of sunscreens is modeled as pseudo‐first‐order kinetics, while the indirect pathway by the reaction of sunscreen with reactive oxygen species is described as second‐order kinetics. Another significant group of works analyzed the effect of the sunscreen components on marine biota (toxicokinetic models), which caused the bioaccumulation of certain compounds in the organisms’ tissues. These works considered that the processes of uptake and excretion of chemicals to and from organisms, as well as their transfer between different organs, followed a first‐order kinetic. The proposed models differ in the following ways: (i) the chemical uptake and (ii) the number of internal compartments of the organism considered, ranging from a single compartment to several compartments, such as the gills, digestive system, and internal organs. The kinetic parameters were obtained from the models for each species and the chemical allowed us to monitor the pollution levels in coastal areas, as well as the quality of the ecosystem.

Sunscreen has become a product widely used by people all over the world, both in

everyday life and associated with sun and beach tourism. Since its invention, it has

evolved through different stages to achieve optimal protection against the entire UV spectrum

with increasingly complex formulations. However, restrictions of the use of certain

components, due to the impact produced by their release and transformation in an aquatic

environment, is a driver for the design of environmentally friendly formulations.

The analysis and modeling of the release and behavior of sunscreen ingredients into

the marine environment, including aquatic organisms, allowed us to predict the fate and

levels of the chemicals under study, and therefore allowed us to predict the potential negative

impacts on the aquatic environment. A large group of models studied the behavior

of the particles and chemicals released into the water by hydrodynamic and kinetic models

in the laboratory, while the knowledge of the fate of sunscreen components in the real

environment is still limited. The laboratory‐scale works analyzed and model: (i) the physical–

chemical property behavior of sunscreens once they are incorporated into the aquatic

environment, (ii) the photodegradation of sunscreen components, and (iii) the release kinetics

of metals present in sunscreens and the formation of nutrients in the receiving

aquatic environment. The direct photolysis of sunscreens is modeled as pseudo‐first‐order

kinetics, while the indirect pathway by the reaction of sunscreen with reactive oxygen

species is described as second‐order kinetics.

Another significant group of works analyzed the effect of the sunscreen components

on marine biota (toxicokinetic models), which caused the bioaccumulation of certain compounds

in the organisms’ tissues. These works considered that the processes of uptake

and excretion of chemicals to and from organisms, as well as their transfer between different

organs, followed a first‐order kinetic. The proposed models differ in the following

ways: (i) the chemical uptake and (ii) the number of internal compartments of the organism

considered, ranging from a single compartment to several compartments, such as the

gills, digestive system, and internal organs. The kinetic parameters were obtained from

the models for each species and the chemical allowed us to monitor the pollution levels in

coastal areas, as well as the quality of the ecosystem.

The knowledge of the mechanisms of release and behaviour of the ingredients in

sunscreens is essential to understand and predict their potential detrimental effects on

marine ecosystems, as well as to identify their most environmentally harmful ingredients.

The modeling approach was a useful prediction tool for these substances and can be of

great value to environmental managers and stakeholders. However, the complexity (multitude

of ingredients) and diversity (according to brand or format) of the sunscreen matrix,

and the multitude of compartments and environmental variables that comprise the marine

ecosystem, limited the application of these models. In this sense, future investigations

should focus on the development of models, which consider the aforementioned factors,

in order to obtain predictions of the potential impacts of these emerging products, and to

inform future effective coastal‐protection strategies and conservation policies based on

sustainable tourism.

The knowledge of the mechanisms of release and behaviour of the ingredients in sunscreens is essential to understand and predict their potential detrimental effects on marine ecosystems, as well as to identify their most environmentally harmful ingredients. The modeling approach was a useful prediction tool for these substances and can be of great value to environmental managers and stakeholders. However, the complexity (multitude of ingredients) and diversity (according to brand or format) of the sunscreen matrix, and the multitude of compartments and environmental variables that comprise the marine ecosystem, limited the application of these models. In this sense, future investigations should focus on the development of models, which consider the aforementioned factors, in order to obtain predictions of the potential impacts of these emerging products, and to inform future effective coastal‐protection strategies and conservation policies based on sustainable tourism.

 

ScholarVision Creations