H2S Removal from Gas Mixtures Using Zeolites: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Mirzokhid Ibrokhimjon ugli Abdirakhimov and Version 1 by Mirzokhid Ibrokhimjon ugli Abdirakhimov.

Natural gas, biogas, and refinery gas all include H2S, which has adverse effects not only on the environment and human health but also on the equipment and catalysts that are employed in the relevant processes. H2S is removed from the aforementioned gases using a variety of techniques in order to fulfill the necessary sales criteria and for reasons of safety. The adsorption method stands out among various other approaches due to its straightforward operation, high level of efficiency, and low overall cost. This technique makes use of a variety of adsorbents, such as metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), activated carbon, and zeolites. The use of zeolite-based adsorbents is by far the most common of these various types.

  • H2S removal
  • separation
  • zeolites
  • adsorption

1. Introduction

Crude oil, natural gas, coal, and biogas are the primary forms of energy resources on the planet. There is an ever-increasing demand for these fuels, and governments are implementing policies to reach zero emissions. The presence of various toxic substances in these fuels leads to the release of harmful substances into the environment during their use. Therefore, fuels are tested to meet certain standards before use. According to the International Energy Agency, natural gas accounts for more than 23% of the world’s fuel supply. Natural gas contains a number of various gases that are toxic, such as H2S, mercaptans, and disulfides. Natural gas and biogas both contain varying amounts of hydrogen sulfide, and because of its corrosive and toxic qualities, they both need to be purified. Natural gas may have varying quantities of H2S in order to satisfy regulatory criteria. For instance, the standards for a pipeline allow for up to 5 ppm in European countries[1], while in the United States it is only 4 ppm [2]
Techniques such as adsorption, absorption, cryogenic distillation, and membrane processes are utilized most frequently in order to bring the amount of H2S to an acceptable level. Each approach comes with its own set of benefits and drawbacks; the one chosen will depend primarily on the concentration of H2S present in the mixture as well as the price of the adsorbent or absorbent used in the process. Because of its low cost, high level of safety, and numerous other advantages, adsorption is by far the most popular approach. It makes use of a wide variety of adsorbents, including as metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), activated carbon, and zeolites, and new combinations of these adsorbents are continually being produced and examined.
Although there have been a number of qualitative review studies[3][4][5][6][7]devoted to the theoretical and experimental separation of H2S on the different types of adsorbents, such as zeolites, activated carbon, MOFs, oxides, and so on, there is still a lack of consensus regarding the best method. 

2. Measurement of Hydrogen Sulfide Concentration

The concentration of H2S is one of the most crucial quality standards for natural gas and biogas. Therefore, it is determined using a variety of techniques. Cost, application complexity, and measurement precision all vary amongst them. As a result, several techniques are employed for various goals. Standards for accurate measurements have been developed and registered by international organizations such as ASTM, UOP, and GPA [83]. The following approaches have been employed in lab settings in numerous research studies because they are straightforward to use despite the complexity of these basic test methods.

2.1. Gas Chromatography

One of the most accurate methods for identifying the precise concentration of the individual components that comprise a mixture is the use of gas chromatography. Measurement of the signals that are produced by the components of the sample that are separated in the column is the basis for this method. Porous polymers, such as Poropack [94], Hayesep-Q column, and sulfur chemiluminescence detector (SCD)[105], are utilized as GC column materials. This method is utilized for doing exhaustive compositional analysis [83].

2.2. Analyzers

Analyzers are readily accessible for purchase in the marketplace and have found widespread application [116][127] to monitor or identify certain gases for a number of applications. The following are some of the most prevalent H2S measurement methods that were utilized in the development of the analyzers. These devices are based on a number of different methodologies.

Electrochemical

Detectors are utilized largely for the purposes of personnel protection and providing information regarding pollution in the workplace. Nevertheless, as can be seen from the numerous studies that have been reported in the literature [138][149], detectors were utilized to measure the concentration of H2S for the sake of research as well. In the electrochemical detectors, the release of free electrons and a decrease in the resistance between the two electrodes occur when H2S molecules take the place of oxygen molecules. This change, which may be detected immediately, is directly proportional to the amount of H2S that is present in the gas. On a lab scale, the H2S concentration can be measured in a variety of ranges, from 0 to 1000 parts per million (ppm), using electrochemical sensors. Although this kind of instrumentation is readily available in both portable and fixed-point solutions and has the potential to be useful in measuring H2S, it is not without drawbacks. Electrochemical cell-based sensors need to be calibrated frequently. They are also susceptible to high temperatures, high humidity, low oxygen levels, and other conditions that might cause drift and cell degradation.

Lead Acetate

H2S tape analyzers make use of a tape that has been coated with lead acetate in order to detect the presence of H2S in a gas sample. This detection method is predicated on the reaction that takes place between H2S and lead acetate, which results in the formation of lead sulfide. There is a direct correlation between the amount of H2S present and the darkness of the stain on the type. These tape analyzers have the capability of accurately measuring low levels of H2S, despite the considerable initial investment required to purchase one. Despite having portable possibilities, this kind of analyzer is often stationary. The interference from SO2 and both low and high humidity can affect the lead acetate tape.

Tunable Diode Lasers

Tunable diode lasers (TDL) are frequently utilized in the process of measuring the concentrations of the constituents of the gas. The absorption properties of different gases are utilized by the technology so that the concentration of athe target gas can be accurately measured. After travelling through the gas sample, the laser light’s intensity is measured by a detector so that the target gas concentration can be derived from this information. Measurements that are exact and exceptionally dependable can be produced by a correctly built TDL analyzer even when the concentration of H2S present is very low.

3. Physicochemical Properties of the H2S

Hydrogen sulfide is a colorless and flammable gas that has a strong and distinctive odor of rotten eggs. It is also known as hydrosulfuric acid, sewer gas, stink damp, dihydrogen monosulfide, dihydrogen sulfide, sulfane, sulfurated hydrogen, and sulfur hydride. It has a greater density than air and may settle on the ground. The characteristics of H2S that are most important to know are outlined in Table 1.
Table 1. Chemical and physical properties of H2S [1510].
Properties Value
Molar mass 34.081 g/mol
Specific gravity 1.2
Boiling point −60.33 °C
Melting point −85.49 °C
Smell Rotten eggs
Color Colorless
Density 1.5392 g/L at STP
Solubility in water 4 g dm−3 (at 20 °C)
Lower Explosive Limit 4.3%
Upper Explosive Limit (UEL): 45%
Autoignition Temperature: 270 °C
Vapor Pressure: 1880 kPa at 20 °C
Vapor Density (Relative to Air): 1.189
Kinetic diameter 0.36 nm

4. Adsorption of H2S

The term “adsorption” refers to a process in which specific compounds are selectively retained by the formation of a physical bond with a solid surface known as an “adsorbent.” Certain gases are drawn to solid surfaces due to the attraction exerted by Van der Waals forces and hydrophobic interactions. The bonding energies involved in adsorption fall somewhere in the range of 10 to 70 kJ/mol [1611]. If the adsorbent can be regenerated, adsorption is an energy-efficient process because it allows the adsorbent to be reused multiple times during the adsorption–-desorption cycle.
A number of different adsorbents, including metal oxides [1712] [1813] [1914], metals [2015], metal-organic frameworks [2116], zeolites, and carbon-based materials [2217], are utilized in the process of removing hydrogen sulfide from a gas mixture that also contains CH4, CO2, N2, and H2. For an adsorbent to be effective in the process, it needs to have a high adsorption capacity, the ability to be regenerated, the ability to maintain its stability at high temperatures, and a high selectivity for the molecule that needs to be removed. Adsorption of H2S is often performed in a fixed bed adsorption column when it is done on a small scale, such as in a laboratory (see Figure 1).
Energies 15 05391 g001 550
Figure 1. Typical experimental laboratory setup for the removal of H2S.

5. Zeolites

Zeolites are crystalline solids formed by the systematic interaction of tetrahedral molecules of AlO4 and SiO4. The following empirical formula can be used to represent them:
M2/nO·Al2O3·xSiO2·yH2O
Because AlO4 tetrahedra are only linked to SiO4 tetrahedra, x in this oxide formula is usually equal to or greater than 2, and n is the cation valence. The cation and water molecules are accommodated in the framework’s channels and linked spaces. The cations are very mobile and may generally be exchanged with other cations to variable degrees.
According to the International Zeolite Association [2318], there are more than 40 natural and more than 280 zeolites that have been artificially synthesized. These zeolites are distinguished from one another by their unique crystal structure and the ratios of Al and Si atoms. In the zeolite molecule, the Al atom is negatively charged and can be balanced with cations such as Na+, K+, and Ca2+. Zeolites have pores that allow molecules of a lower diameter to be adsorbed, whereas molecules of a larger diameter are unable to pass through these pores. This is an attractive adsorptive property for removing impurities such as hydrogen sulfide, carbon dioxide, and moisture from natural gas. To this day, a large number of zeolites have been synthesized and evaluated for the separation of H2S from a wide variety of mixed gases, and the findings have been very encouraging.
The zeolites known as Faujasite (FAU) and Linde Type A (LTA) are utilized rather frequently in the separation processes. They are composed of sodalite (SOD) structures that are organized in a pattern that varies depending on the amount of aluminium to silicon (Figure 2).
Energies 15 05391 g002 550
Figure 2. Structure of (a) Faujasite (FAU) and (b) Linde Type A (LTA) zeolites [2318].

6. The Synthesis of Zeolites

Natural zeolites can be found in large quantities all over the world, but they are not commercially available because of their low purity, the high cleaning cost, and inability to be used in certain processes. Synthetic zeolites, on the other hand, are produced on an industrial scale. These zeolites serve as adsorbents, catalysts, and ion-exchangers, among other functions, and are utilized for a variety of applications. Milton [2419] developed the first low-silica zeolites in the late 1940s by hydrothermally crystallizing alkali aluminosilicate gels under low temperatures and pressures. Synthesizing zeolites can be done in a number of different ways, including hydrothermal [127], alkali-fusion [2520], and microwave-assisted [2621]  methods. The synthesis of an appropriate zeolite can be accomplished using any one of the aforementioned approaches. As raw materials, a variety of salts and minerals containing the elements aluminium and silicon are utilized. The elements aluminium and silicon can be obtained from a variety of sources, including sodium aluminate, aluminium sulphate, aluminate nitrate, sodium, or alkaline silicate, and minerals such as clay and kaolin [2722]. The synthesis of an appropriate zeolite can be accomplished using any one of the aforementioned approaches. As raw materials, a variety of salts and minerals containing the elements aluminium and silicon are utilized. The elements aluminium and silicon can be obtained from a variety of sources, including sodium aluminate, aluminium sulphate, aluminate nitrate, sodium, or alkaline silicate; minerals such clay and kaolin [2823]; and from iron ore tailings, rice husk ash, coal fly ash, lithium slag, and paper sludge ash.

7. H2S Adsorption Mechanism on Zeolites

There are two primary explanations for why H2S can be absorbed physically by zeolites:
  • One of the things that sets zeolites apart from other minerals is the fact that their chemical structure remains relatively unchanged throughout time. These particular chemical structures have pores that are on the nanometer scale, and they appear to function as molecular sieves. Even molecules that are significantly smaller than the pores found in zeolites have the potential to become “trapped” within these pores. In light of this, it is possible to estimate the zeolite that can be employed [2924] by first determining the kinetic diameter of the molecule that needs to be separated. Zeolites with pore sizes larger than 0.36 nm, which is the kinetic diameter of H2S, have the ability to adsorb H2S. PThe presence of impurities such as CO2, which has a kinetic diameter of 0.33 nm, causes a low separation efficiency due to competitive adsorption.  Table 2 provides the kinetic diameters of several molecules that could be present in the mixture with H2S and induce competitive adsorption.
Table 2. Kinetic diameter for various molecules [2924].
Molecule Kinetic Diameter (nm)
NH3 0.26
H2O 0.28
CO2 0.33
N2 0.36
O2 0.36
SO2 0.36
CH4 0.38
  • The second explanation is that zeolites are able to adsorb H2S as a result of contact with the polar structure of the zeolite [25]. When the intracrystalline pores and channels of zeolites are filled with H2S molecules, the zeolites are unable to adsorb, and there are no more adsorptions that take place. It is possible to restore the adsorption capacity of zeolite by modifying the conditions of the adsorption equilibrium [26] in terms of temperature, pressure, or both. This process is referred to as “regeneration”. The contact between the molecules being adsorbed and the active sites (sites placed over the external surface of the zeolites, or close to the micropore openings) of the zeolite becomes less strong with time, which results in the molecules being desorbed. During the adsorption process, the permanent structure of the zeolites is maintained since the phase of H2S that is adsorbed onto the zeolites does not change any of the zeolites’ atoms. Temperature, pressure, and polarity are the three most important factors that determine how well H2S can be adsorbed.
  • The second explanation is that zeolites are able to adsorb H2S as a result of contact with the polar structure of the zeolite [30]. When the intracrystalline pores and channels of zeolites are filled with H2S molecules, the zeolites are unable to adsorb, and there are no more adsorptions that take place. It is possible to restore the adsorption capacity of zeolite by modifying the conditions of the adsorption equilibrium [31] in terms of temperature, pressure, or both. This process is referred to as “regeneration”. The contact between the molecules being adsorbed and the active sites (sites placed over the external surface of the zeolites, or close to the micropore openings) of the zeolite becomes less strong with time, which results in the molecules being desorbed. During the adsorption process, the permanent structure of the zeolites is maintained since the phase of H2S that is adsorbed onto the zeolites does not change any of the zeolites’ atoms. Temperature, pressure, and polarity are the three most important factors that determine how well H2S can be adsorbed.
Sometimes, chemical bonds such as covalent or ionic are formed between the surface of the zeolite and H2S. This process is known as chemisorption, and its interaction is much stronger than physisorption. Chemisorption can, in fact, meet the demand for the selective capture of H2S; however, one drawback is that it results in the development of irreversible bonds, which reduces the potential for regeneration. Therefore, for H2S separation in industrial processes, physisorption is preferred, as the reversible process take place by weak van der Waals forces and electrostatic interaction.

8. The Effect of Si/Al Ratio on H2S Adsorption

The ratio of silicon to aluminium, which is known as the Si/Al ratio, is the most significant factor in determining the structures and properties of zeolites. Zeolites can be categorized as low, medium, high, or silica, depending on this ratio [3227]. The thermal stability, acidity, and structural makeup of zeolites are all influenced by the Si/Al ratio. When the ratio of silicon to aluminium increases, some properties, such as thermal stability, increase. The amount of silica found in hydrophilic zeolites is quite low, whereas the amount of silica found in hydrophobic zeolites is relatively considerable [5]. Ion exchange capacity and cation concentration are both influenced by the amount of aluminium present, and both tend to decrease as the ratio of silicon to aluminium rises. For the purpose of separating hydrogen sulfide from a variety of streams, hydrophilic zeolites with a high level of surface selectivity are recommended. In this case, zeolites of types A and X that have a low silica content and demonstrate strong adsorption capabilities are preferable candidates. Karge and Rasko [3328] investigated how the ratio of silicon to aluminium influences the mechanism of hydrogen sulfide adsorption by the FAU zeolites (X and Y). When the ratio of silicon to aluminium was larger than 2.5 (Y), they discovered that physical adsorption of H2S occurred. Due to the fact that low silica zeolites (Si/Al = 1–1.5) are aluminium saturated and have the largest cation concentration, it may be deduced that Na+ cations play an important role in the dissociative adsorption. Consequently, an increase in the Si/Al ratio causes a decrease in the amount of Na+ ions, which in turn causes a decreased dissociation of H2S into HS- and H+, indicating an increase in physical adsorption. Moreover, by replacing the Na+ cations in a 4A zeolite with Ca2+, a 5A zeolite is produced, resulting in an increase in phyhsisorption [3429]. The Si/Al ratio of zeolites, which are frequently employed in separation processes, is shown in Table 3 below:
Table 3. The Si/Al ratio of zeolites [2924].
Type of the Zeolites Si/Al Ratio
Linde type A (LTA) 1–6
Faujasite X type 1–1.5
Faujasite Y type higher than 1.5
Chabazite (CHA) 1-to infinity
MFI framework (ZSM-5) 10-to infinity
Mordenite (MOR) 4–12

9. H2S Selectivity

The ability of an adsorbent to selectively adsorb a component in a gas mixture is affected by the presence of many components in the mixture. Adsorbents may have the capability to adsorb multiple components at the same time [3530][3631]. As a result, the selectivity of adsorbents is an essential factor to consider while making your selection. In order to choose and evaluate zeolites that are capable of selectively adsorbing hydrogen sulfide from gas streams, it is vital to take into consideration the zeolites’ capacity to absorb other contaminants, such as carbon dioxide and water. The polarity of zeolites depends on the Si/Al ratio [3732] and is a significant factor in determining their selectivity. They are well attracted to zeolites due to the fact that methane and its homologues in natural gas are non-polar and polar molecules such as H2S, CO2, and water. As was said earlier, selecting the appropriate zeolite is essential to decrease the adsorption of CO2 and H2O molecules while simultaneously enhancing affinity toward H2S molecules.

10. Adsorption Capacity

The number of contaminations that the adsorbent needs to remove is an essential factor in determining how successful the operation will be. A decrease in the length of the adsorption cycle results from an increase in the adsorption capacity, which improves the separation of the targeted molecule from the mixture. The adsorption capacity can be determined by calculating the ratio of the amount of the adsorbed molecule to the mass of the adsorbent, and is often expressed in the unit of mmol/g or mg/g.
The following equation can be used to determine the maximum adsorption capacity of a zeolite:
q e = ( C 0 − C e ) V m
where, C0 and Ce represent the initial and equilibrium concentration (ppm) of the H2S, respectively; V (L) represents the total volume of gas mixture used in each experimental run; and m (g) represents the dry mass of the adsorbent that was used for the adsorption process. All concentrations are expressed in mg/g.
The adsorption capacity for continuous adsorption can be calculated from the breakthrough curves using the following equation [3833]:
 
C a d s = Q t o t · M W · [ C i n · t 1 − ( t 1 − t 0 ) · 0.5 ] V m · m · 10 3
  • Qtot = total gas flow rate (Nl/h).
  • MW = molecular weight of H2S.
  • Cin = inlet H2S concentration (ppmv).
  • t1= breakthrough time when the outlet concentration is 1 ppmv (h).
  • t0= breakthrough time at the last detection of 0 ppmv (h).
  • Vm = molar volume (24,414 Nl/mol). m = mass of adsorbent material (g).

2. Natural Zeolites

11. Applications of Natural and Synthetic Zeolites 
Although natural zeolites have adsorption properties that are several times higher than those of synthetic zeolites, very few natural zeolites have been studied in the context of the removal of hydrogen sulfide from a variety of gases. A 94% hydrogen sulfide adsorption performance was reached by Pourzolfaghar et al. [39] from biogas using virgin zeolite without activation. This particular zeolite had a high Si/Al ratio of 5:99, which resulted in a higher adsorption capacity but was lower than the adsorption capacity of the modified zeolite. A number of experiments showed that virgin zeolite had natural regeneration. Thecording to influence of CO2 and moisture content on the removal of H2S and SO2 from biogas using naturally pure zeolite covered with TiO2 utilizing ultrasonic-calcination investigated by Liu et al.[14]. Sintering for 2 h at 400 °C was found to be the best condition for obtaining maximum removal capacity and improved mechanical properties. To regenerate utilized TiO2/zeoliteh, it was washed at 60 °C for 5 h, dried at 110 °C for 12 h, and then calcined at 400 °C for 2 h. As the amount of TiO2 on zeolite incnatureases, the formation of SO2 rises. That is why 5% of TiO2 onto zeolite demonstrated the best adsorption properties, with an adsorption capacity of 0.13 mmol/g (4.42 mg H2S/g). As the competitive adsorption takes place in the presence of CO2, H2S adsorption capacity has decreased. It was found that moisture content decreased the adsorption capacity of the zeolite whereas adsorption capacity of TiO2/zreolite increased due to TiO2 photocataalysis. Ahmad et al. [40] examined natural diatomite, which is a low-cost silica material, and tested its water and acid-treated modification in biogas purification. In order to prepare the treated diatomite, washing was done at a variety of temperatures, and sulfuric acid was applied in a variety of concentrations. Samples of diatomite that had been treated with water and those that had been treated with sulfuric acid were both dried in an oven at 105 °C for 24 hr. According to the findings, acid treatment made it easier to modify the surface area and functional group of the diatomite, which led to an increase in the adsorption capacity to 6.87 mg good at separating H2S/g. On the other hand, water hydration reduced the contaminants and improved the diatomite pore volume, which led to an increase in the adsorption capacity to 3.82 mg H2S/g. During the process of water purification, an increase in temperature results in a greater capacity for adsorption. It was discovered that a concentration of 5M H2SO4 produced the best results when purifying diatomite in order to acquire a high adsorption capacity. Prasetyo and Soegijono Prasetyo and Soegijono [37] modified Bayah natural zeolites, which are high silica zeolites, in the ferric chloride hexahydrate solution using high-intensity ultrasonic waves. They then examined the H2S adsorption performance of the modified Bayah natural zeolites. Minerals found in Bayah are primarily composed of clinoptilolite, with traces of mordenite that contain a variety of elements, including carbon, sodium, magnesium, potassium, calcium, and iron. Sonification was applied to a number of different time lapses. Based on the findings, it is possible to draw the conclusion that the time of sonification has no bearing on the distribution of particle sizes. The chemical modification of Bayah natural zeolite increased its adsorption ability by 70% to 117%. In many situations, the zeolitic imidazolate framework ZIF-8 was used in CO2 capture. Jameh et al. [41] investigated ZIF-8 synthesis and modification using methanol and toluene for CO2 and H2S removal from natural gas. The specific surface area and microporous pore volume of ZIF-8 increased as a result of methanol modification, demonstrating a high adsorption capability. According to the abovementioned research, natural zeolites are also good at separating H2S. Various procedures, including as high-temperature calcination, the addition of various metals, and acid processing, can be employed to improve their efficacy in H2S removal. Table 4 highlights methods for removing H2S using natural zeolites.
Table 4. Studies based on natural zeolites.
Zeolite TypeSelectivity/Adsorption CapacityReference
Virgin zeolite94% adsorption performance[39]
Pure zeolite covered with TiO24.42 mg H2S/g[14]
Water treated diatomite3.82 mg H2S/g[40]
Acid treated diatomite6.87 mg H2S/g[40]
Bayah natural zeolite70–117% adsorption performance[42]

3. Synthetic Zeolites and Their Modifications

Because natural zeolites are insufficient for commercial use as catalysts and adsorbents, synthesized zeolites are utilized instead. It is necessary to improve the characteristics of zeolites. To that end, metals can be added, calcination temperatures can be changed, and the composition of zeolites can be altered in other ways. Metal ions are introduced into the zeolite structure by two methods: ion exchange and impregnation. In order to remove hydrogen sulfide from the air at 100, 200, and 300 °C, Jafari et al. [43] examined Y and ZSM-5 (MFI), which are considered intermediate and high silica zeolites modified with 3% and 5% of magnetite nanoparticles. Drying and calcination were carried out at 105 °C for 10 h and 450 °C for 4 h, respectively, to purify and activate. After adding magnetite nanoparticles and calcining them, the modified recent years, zeolites’ surface area, volume, and diameter decreased. On the other hand, the crystal structure was unaffected by either magnetite or calcination. Due to the presence of magnetite nanoparticles, zeolite Y’s meso/micro-porosity increased when compared to ZSM-5. A weight ratio of 5% was determined to be the ideal loading percentage since a high loading percentage lengthens the breakthrough time. At an H2S concentration of 120 ppm, a 5% -Y/Fe3O4 a-based adsorbent was used to produce the greatest adsorption capacity, which was equal to 69.92 mg H2S/g. Thi in the s phenomenon can be explained through the chemisorption of H2S by iron oxide. Interesting resepararch was carried out by Yokogawa et al. [37] to assess LTA (Zeolite A) and MFI (ZSM-5) zeolites and their Ag-doped samples to remove volatile sulfur compounds produced in a mouth. LTA and MFI zeolites were synthesized by the wet method and ion exchange of Ag was carried out and dried at 90 °C for 24 h. On both 0.02 g of Ag-doped LTA and MFI, the n of H2S concentration was lowered to 24% in 2 h, to almost zero in 4 h, and to be almost zero H2S concentration for 4 h and 8 h, respectively. In zeolites, experiments showed that adding alkali atoms enhances their capacity to recover hydrogen sulfide, and the Ag-doped LTA zeolite had a better capacity than the Ag-doped MFI. As peaks corresponding to Ag2S were not identified in the XRD patterns, the authors described this phenoom gas menon as the capture of H2S by the zeolite pores. The addition of Ag to zeolites helps to increase the affinity toward H2S. At a range of temperatures (25–85 °C), Starke et al.[34] studied the effect of increasing Ca2+ on the zeolite type of LTA, which is binder free and has a Si/Al ratio of 1. A breakthrough curve was evaluated in a fixed-bed adsorption unit and calcination was carried out before each experiment at 300 °C for 4h under a nitrogen atmosphere. The H2S concentrures hation was in the range of 50–2000 ppm. It was concluded that increasing the Ca2+ cations in the zeolite causes physisorption to dominate. Increasing the Ca2+ in the degree of exchange rises the adsorption capacity due to higher ionic charge of Ca2+; this because it causes strong interactions to form between the Ca and H2S molecules. Temperature has a negative effect on the adsorption capacity. Nguyen and his team [44] synthesized Faujasite zeolite hydrothermally and ion-exchanged with divalent metal ions (Co2+, Mn2+, Ni2+, Cu2+, Ca2+, and Zn2+). H2S adsorption was carried out in continuous fixed bed. Ion-exchange modification of NaX with Co, Cu, and Zn considerably enhanced the adsorption capacity. It can be explained by the reaction between the CoO, CuO, and H2S molecules. When compared to raw X n synthesizeolite, the CoX, CuX, and ZnX zeolites showed more than 7, 13, and 24 times the H2S adsorption capability, respectively, which means the ZnX sample had a higher adsorption capacity o f 23.5 mg H2S /g. Many researchers are attempting to remove H2S with the help of the Ag ion. Kumar etm al. [10] examined Ag and Cu modified X and Y zeolites to separate H2S from gas streams containing He, N2, CO2, CO, and H2O at room temperature and 150 °C. X and Y zeolites had an Al/Si ratio of 1.3 and 2.4. CuX and CuY samples showed high adsorption capacity due to forming new active sites at 150 °C whereas the adsorption capacity of the NaX, AgY, and AgX samples declined. Despite the presence of the various gases in the mixture, AgX and AgY zeolites were able to remove H2S. However, CuX and CuY were unsucrious cessful to remove H2S in the presence of 2% CO. It is possible that the impregnation of copper to zeolite increased CO’s affinity to the adsorbent while Ag attracted H2S. Chen et al. [45] tested an ion-exchanged NaX zeolite with Zn, Co, and Ag to identify the adsorption perforap raw mance of H2S and COS from Claus tail gas. CoX, ZnX, and AgX ion-exchanged zeolites were synthesized using their nitrate solution and dried at 100 °C. Characterization of the samples was done by SEM (see Figure 3), XRD, and FTIR terials bechniques to prove the ion exchanging of the metals. A dynamic adsorption experiment was carried out in a fixed bad adsorption column at 25 °C. Although the BET surface area of the ion-exchanged AgX zeolite decreased to 30% compared to NaX, AgX had the largest H2S and COS breakthrough capacituse they, with 1.53 mmol/g (52.02 mg H2S/g) and 10.5 µmol/g (0.63 mg COS/g), respectively. This can be explained by the chemical adsorption between the AgX zeolite and H2S.
Energies 15 05391 g003 550
Figure 3. SEM images of NaX (a), CoX (b), ZnX (c), and AgX (d), reprinted from [45], with permission of Elsevier.
N widevertheless, regeneration of the AgX zeolite under various conditions was investigated. Regeneration in the presence of air at 350 °C was better, and the AgX sample exhibited a remarkable thermal stability, retaining its original structure even after six adsorption–regeneration cycles. The performy availance of the Cu-modified 13X was investigated by Barelli and colleaguesle [13] in the separation of H2S from biogas. Experiments were carried out under a broad spectrum of operational conditions (temperatures ranging from 30 °C to 120 °C, and H2S concentrations ranging from 200 to 1000 ppm) in order to determine the optimal operating parameters. Temperature has a beneficial effect on performance, as demonstrated by the fact that a higher adsorption capacity of 13X Ex-Cu zeolite was obtained (40 mg H2S/g) when the temperature was set to 120 °C. When the matrix composition was changed, the adsorption capacity decreased because competitive adsorption took place. The 13X Ex-Cu zeolite had an adsorption capacity of 14mg H2S/g and 23 mg H2S/g lowith the pure CO2 and CH4, respectively, due tpro the increase in Cu2+ that causes π-complexation between the Cu2+ ions and sulfur compounds. Simulctaneous removal of H2S and SO2 from the Claus tail gas using the 13X zeolite was carried out by Yang et al. [46]. The adsorption was performed in a simulated Claus gas n containing 20,000 ppmv H2S, 10,000 ppmv SO2, 15 vol% water vapor, and the balance N2 gas at 150 °C. According to the breakthrough curve, the fresh 13X zeolite showed an adsorption sulfur capacity of 179.7 mg S/g for H2S and SO2. Regeneration was done by purging of N2 at 490 °C for 120 min with the space velocity of 1000 h−1. The adsorption sulfur capacity decreased to 148.1 mg S/g after five adsorption–regeneration cycles due to formation of sulfate in the pores of 13X, which causes the blockage of pores. Modifying the 13X zeolite with Ag and Cu by impregnation, to remove the organic sulfur compounds from natural gas, was investigated by Zhu et al. [47]. Modification of 13X with Ag increased the adsorption capacity by 1.6 times (64.8 mg S/g) compared to the raw 13X. Calcination at high temperatures improved the performance of the modified zeolite, with 450 °C being the best one. Cu/13X also showed a high adsorption capacity in the following sequence: ethyl mercaptan > methyl sulfide > dimethyl disulfide. The results show that modification of the 13X zeolite with metals such as Ag and Cu increases their adsorption affinity to organic sulfur compounds. The authors assumed that Cu/13X- and Ag/13X-modified zeolites show higher efficiency in H2S separation. Adding metal ions to zeolite increases the adsorption capacity due to a Metal-S bond. Bareschino et al. [48] recently conducted studies to determine the saturation of NaX zeolite with H2S. The effects of H2S concentration, temperature, and adsorbent age were investigated, and it was discovered that the adsorbent does not fully saturate since H2S oxidation occurs:
H2S + 1.5O2 = SO2 + H2O
H2S + 0.5O2 = S + H2O
At high temperatures, elemental S is formed in the pores of zeolite; thus, no zero H2S concentration can be achieved by regenerating the adsorbent.
Recent research conducted by Kulawong et al. [9] examined the effectiveness of the Ag-exchanged NaX zeolite in removing H2S from an anaerobic digestion reactor. The preparation of this zeolite required varying concentrations of AgNO3 (11.5%, 34.1%, 71.6%, 76.7%, and 78.8%) in order to get varying degrees of silver loading on the zeolite by heating it at 40 °C for 2–12 h. As the amount of silver loaded into the system rose, the H2S concentration dropped, demonstrating that silver makes H2S more attractive. As a result, an increase in the quantity of Ag loaded was accompanied by an increase in the effectiveness of H2S removal. Since the maximum content was not statistically significant, the NaX zeolite with a lower Ag concentration of 34.1 wt% labeled as AgX2 would be more cost-effective with an adsorption performance of 97.35%. This is because the maximum content did not meet the criteria for statistical significance. Manullang et al. [49] investigated the influence of the Zn/Zeolite ratio and calcination temperature on the separation of hydrogen sulfide from biogas. The impregnation method was used to prepare the samples at concentrations of 10, 20, and 30 wt/v% ZnO. Prepared samples were activated for 3 h by calcination at 200, 300, and 400 °C. The crystal structure of zeolites can be damaged and the surface of a zeolite covered by metal due to the sintering of metal salts at high temperatures, resulting in a loss in adsorption performance. The optimal parameters for separating H2S from biogas were found: a Zn/Zeolite ratio of 20% and a calcination temperature of 300 °C. Adsorption capacity reached up to 6.36 mg H2S/g adsorbent under these conditions, and the purification rate was 99%. In order to evaluate the effect of silver on NaA zeolite for the removal of hydrogen sulfide, Bahraminia et al. [50] studied synthesized NaA nano zeolite and its Ag-exchanged sample. NaA zeolite was synthesized hydrothermally and AgNaA was prepared by ion-exchange and both dried at 60 °C for 12 h. The structure of the samples was confirmed by XRD and SEM techniques. The adsorption capacity of the NaA zeolite with Ag+ ions was found to have increased (33.24 mg H2S/g). In addition, the regeneration of AgNaA was carried out five times at a temperature of 350 °C. As a result of the development of sulfur on the surface of the zeolite, the adsorption capacity showed a modest decrease of 5%. The equilibrium and dynamic behaviors of natural gas separation, using Na-SSZ-13 zeolite, were studied by Thomson [51]. The adsorption process was carried out in a dynamic column breakthrough (DCB) apparatus. A feed gas mixture of CH4, C2H6, CO2, and H2S at different concentrations was used. Binary, ternary, and quaternary DCB experiments were carried out to assess the adsorption performance of Na-SSZ-13. COS formation has occurred because of the presence of CO2 and H2S in the feed gas. Ideal Adsorption Solution Theory (IAST) is applied to obtain the mixture adsorption data. When the IAST was used to simulate the gas adsorption mixtures on the Na-SSZ-13 zeolite, the adsorption behavior and experimental breakthrough curves matched well. The effects of temperature, H2S inlet concentration, gas matrix, and adsorption/desorption cycles of the adsorption of H2S on the industrial molecular sieves (IMS) were studied by Georgiadis et al. [52] theoretically and practically. The LTA-type zeolite structure framework was proved by characterization of IMS, which had a BET surface area of 590 m2 g−1. Adsorption was done at 35, 50, and 100 °C, and reduction in the adsorption capacity occurred as physical adsorption took place, which is exothermic. IMS had the highest adsorption capacity of 122.8 mg H2S/g at 35 °C. Studies at different concentrations of H2S have shown that the higher the concentration, the higher the adsorption capacity. The adsorption capacity was reduced due to the presence of CO2 in the gas composition and its competitive adsorption with H2S. Although adsorption/desorption cycles were carried out 15 times, no significant changes were observed on the H2S uptake. At room temperature, Rezaei et al. [53] compared the ETS-2 adsorbent exchanged with Ag, Ca, Cu, and Zn metals to a commercially available adsorbent, R3-11G. In comparison to R3-11G, the metal-exchanged ETS-2 zeolite showed better effective adsorption properties. The Cu-exchanged ETS-2 zeolite had the highest H2S capacity as an absorbent, 29.7 mg H2S/g. For the sake of safety, H2S was removed from the simulated gases containing nitrogen and other inert gases in many studies. Heck et al. [54] conducted pressure swing adsorption of concentrated H2S (0.1–0.7%) and CO2 from a feed gas containing CH4, CO2, and H2S, which is similar to natural gas using commercially available zeolites, namely, 4A, 5A, and 13X. The effect of the concentration of H2S and pressure were studied by a number of experiments. 13X and 5A zeolites may remove H2S to a nearly zero concentration. A 100% recovery of H2S was achieved by desorption in 13X and 4A. It was concluded that the PSA method can be used industrially for the removal of H2S from natural gas. Bowen et al. [55] investigated hydrogen sulfide removal from natural gas using titanosilicite zeolite (TS-1) in the presence of hydrogen peroxide and examined the effect of reaction temperature and H2O2 concentration on the catalytic oxidation. The result showed that increasing the reaction temperature and H2O2 concentration increase the catalytic oxidation of TS-1 towards H2S. In Table 5, studies based on modification of synthetic zeolites are summarized.
Table 5. Studies based on modification of synthetic zeolites.
 
Zeolite TypeSelectivity/Adsorption CapacityModification TypeReference
5% -Y/Fe3O469.92 mg H2S/g.Impregnation[43]
Ag doped LTA0% H2S concentration after 4 houtperforms commercially activated carbonWet method and impregnation[62][37]
Ag doped MFI
Activated ash0% H2S concentration after 8 hWet method and impregnation[37]
3.22 mg H2S/g[63]LTA modified by CaAn increase in physical adsorptionIon-exchange
Wood-derived-biochar2.2 mg H[34]
2S/g[63]ZnX23.5 mg H2S/gIon-exchange[
Coal fly ash and blast furnace cement62.15 mg H2S/g (650 g-H2S m−3) under dry conditions44]
[64]AgX61.2 mg H2S/gIon-exchange
Coal fly ash and blast furnace cement71.71 mg H2S/g (730 g-H2S m[10]
−3) under humid condition[64]AgY44.8 mg H2S/gIon-exchange
Zeolite rock97.78% performance[67][10]
AgX
Iron-modified bentonite52.02 mg H2S/g32.256 mg HIon-exchange2S/g[45]
[68]13X Ex-Cu40 mg H2S/g with N2Ion-exchange[13]
Copper-modified sludge11.18 mg H2S/g[6813X Ex-Cu14 mg H2S/g with pure CO2Ion-exchange[13]
13X Ex-Cu23 mg H2S/g with pure CH4Ion-exchange[13]
13X179.7 mg S/g [46]
AgX64.8 mg S/gImpregnation[47]
Ag exchanged NaX97.35% adsorption performanceIon-exchange[9]
20% ratio of Zn/Zeolite6.36 mg H2S/gImpregnation[49]
AgNaA33.24 mg H2S/gIon-exchange[50]
Industrial molecular sieves (IMS)122.8 mg H2S/g [52]
Cu exchanged ETS-229.7 mg H2S/gIon-exchange[53]
H2O2/titanosiliciteAn increase in catalytic oxidation [55]

4. Zeolite-Based Adsorbents Synthesized from Various Sources

In recent years, zeolite-based adsorbents used in the separation of H2S from gas mixtures have been synthesized from various cheap raw materials because they are widely available and have a low production cost. Jalil R. Ugal et al. [56] studied the adsorption capacity values of 3A, 4A, and 5A zeolites prepared from Iraqi kaolin by the ion-exchange method. Characterization results of the prepared samples proved that 3A, 4A, and 5A molecular sieves were successfully synthesized and they had a similar structure as the standard type. 4A has a high affinity for H2S according to the values of the Langmuir isotherm, which best describes the gas–solid face adsorption. 5A zeolite showed an adsorption capacity of 79.384 µmol/g (2.7 mg H2S/g). The H2S adsorption capacity increased with a decrease in temperature from 55 °C to −5 °C. This is explained by the authors in that a rise in temperature weakens the adsorption interactions between the adsorbent and the adsorbate. This indicates that the synthesized molecular sieves on the basis of kaolin are suitable to use in the H2S separation. Liu et al. [57] carried out hydrogen sulfide removal using 4A zeolite synthesized from naturally abandoned zeolite, namely, attapulgite (ATP). 4A zeolite was synthesized under various ratios. The effects of the ratio of silicon to aluminum, ratio of sodium to silicon, ratio of water to sodium, crystallization temperature, and time were investigated in the removal of H2S. From the breakthrough curves of experiments under various conditions and ratios (see Figure 4), it can be seen that there is competitive adsorption between H2S and N2 at the beginning. The ratio of silicon to aluminum has a substantial influence on the performance of H2S removal, as demonstrated in the figures; however, the ratio of sodium to silicon has a weak impact on the performance of H2S removal. When considering both factors, a ratio of 1.5 might be the best possible figure. A low ratio of water to sodium was ideal since ATP naturally contains elements such as magnesium, calcium, and iron. These elements can form their oxides, which have a favorable impact on the removal of H2S. From these findings, it can be concluded that the zeolite 4A synthesized under the following conditions: n (SiO2)/n (Al2O3)) = 1.5, n (Na2O)/n (SiO2) = 1.5, crystallization at 90 °C for 4 h, n (H2O)/n (Na2O) = 30) showed a high adsorption capacity of 8.36 mg H2S/g sorbent and a saturation sulfur sorption capacity (that is complete adsorption capacity that can no longer adsorb H2S) of 12.4 mg H2S/g at 50 °C. Because of its distinguished properties, 4A zeolite synthesized from attapulgite is proposed as a promising material for H2S adsorption. Furthermore, the 4A was regenerated at 350 °C for 2 h using nitrogen purging at a flow rate of 200 mL/min. Characterization analyses showed no significant changes in BET surface area, crystal structure, and surface group after regeneration.
Energies 15 05391 g004 550
Figure 4. H2S adsorption breakthrough curves at 25 °C under different synthesis conditions: (a) at various (SiO2)/n (Al2O3) ratios (b) at various (Na2O)/n (SiO2) ratios, (c) at various temperatures, (d) at various crystallization time, (e) at various (H2O)/n (Na2O) ratios, reprinted from [57], with permission of Elsevier.
Oliveira et al.[58] examined H2S adsorption on NaY zeolite in equilibrium and fixed bed conditions. NaY zeolite was prepared using kaolin clay and examined its adsorption properties for the H2S removal from natural gas in continuous PSA. The Si/Al ratio of NaY was 2.8. Adsorption isotherms obtained at temperatures of 20, 30, and 40 degrees Celsius, up to a partial pressure of 1.2 bars of hydrogen sulfide, are advantageous and offer maximum adsorption capacities that are greater than 6.0 mol kg−1 (204 mgH2S/g). Abdullah et al. [59] studied the influence of ZnO on Na-A zeolite synthesized by impregnation from Malaysian kaolin in biogas desulfurization. ZnO was employed to increase the adsorption capacity of zeolite and because its low cost compared to other oxides. When the loading rate was increased from 10 to 20 wt%, both the micropore area and the micropore volume decreased. However, there was no substantial change found even after increasing the loading rate from 20 to 30 wt%, which indicates that the loading rate was exceeded. It was noticed that the highest adsorption capacity of 15.75 mg S/g sorbent H2S when 20 wt% ZnO was loaded onto Na-A. The fact that the characteristics of the used adsorbent were not recovered as a result of regeneration at temperatures of 100 and 200 °C is evidence that chemical adsorption took place by the following equation:
ZnO + H2S(g) = ZnS + H2O
As a low-cost material, a water–glass solution was used as an Si source and a 13X molecular sieve was synthesized hydrothermally to reduce H2S from propane by [12]. The BET surface area of the synthesized 13X sample had 462.56 m2/g. The adsorption process was done at room temperature and different pressures up to 25 bar. The adsorption capacity of the synthesized 13X zeolite was obtained at 10 bars and no considerable influence on the adsorption capacity was observed after increasing the pressure. Table 6 summarizes the approaches of H2S removal using synthetic zeolites.
Table 6. Studies on synthetic zeolitic adsorbents from various sources.
 
Zeolite TypeSourceSelectivity/Adsorption CapacitySynthesis MethodReference
5AIraqi Kaolin2.7 mg H2S/gIon-exchange[60]
4AAttapulgite8.36 mg H2S/gHydrothermal[57]
NaYKaolin clay5.345 mg H2S/gHydrothermal[58]
20 wt% ZnO/Na-AMalaysian kaolin15.75 mg S/gImpregnation[59]
13XWater-glass solution44 mg H2S/g (20ppm)Hydrothermal[12]

512. Newly Developed Adsorbents from Wastes

One of the most important things that contributes to successful and feasible development is the utilization of inexpensive raw materials on an industrial scale. As a result, a number of research initiatives have been abandoned on the development of novel compounds derived from less expensive and obsolete basic materials. The production of zeolites requires the utilization of a number of different minerals, including kaolinite, fly ash, sludge, asbestos, and rice husk. The investigation of wastes as an adsorbent in the separation of H2S would open up a new sector. Cebula et al.[61]] synthesized a universal adsorbent, namely, Halloyfill, from a halloysite mineral—which is an aluminosilicate clay mineral belonging to the kaolin group—and applied it to the removal of various pollutants such as siloxanes, H2S, and NH3 generated from biotechnological processes. The results showed that it can remove NH3 (95–99%), H2S (above 99%-21.3 mg H2S/g), and volatile organic compounds (70–81%). The authors also proposed that the spent adsorbent can be used as a fertilizer in agriculture and gardening. CaCO3 was the primary component of two kinds of the waste solids that Awe and colleagues [62] investigated as potential H2S adsorbents. Fresh calcite and commercially activated carbon (AC) were utilized as comparative materials in order to validate the adsorption performance of the synthesized adsorbent. In addition, AC-CaCO3 waste mixtures with a variety of different ratios were researched. In 540 min, 15 mg H2S was adsorbed when the weight ratio of AC to CaCO3 was 3:1, whereas AC only absorbed 14 mg H2S over that same time period. It is possible to explain the presence of a variety of metals in the solid waste, including Ca, Mg, and Fe. The findings demonstrated that using wastes containing CaCO3 as an adsorbent for H2S removal was more effective than using activated carbon or calcite, which are both available for purchase in the marketplace. Three waste-derived adsorbent materials (wood-derived biochar (WDB), sludge-derived activated carbon (SDC), and activated ash) were studied by Zhu et al. [63] for the separation of H2S from simulated biogas (CH4-to-CO2 ratio at 1.5 and H2S concentration at 200 ppm). WDB and activated ash were activated at 700 °C, while SDC was activated at 600 °C. Characterizations of the pre-treated adsorbent were analyzed by TGA, XRF, SEM, and BET. The outlet concentration of H2S was measured using a mass spectrometer to determine the adsorption capacity. Activated ash showed the highest adsorption capacity, at 3.22 mg H2S/g, among the materials; this was because chemisorption occurred as a result of the presence of alkaline mineral species such Fe, Cu, and Mn, which have a tendency to react with H2S. Wood-derived biochar has an adsorption capability of 2.2 mg H2S/g due to its high surface area of 210.18 m2/g. To demonstrate the existence of physical adsorption, the surface area of WDB decreased from 210.18 m2 g−1 to 96.95 m2 g−1. This occurred because high porosity was responsible for capturing the H2S molecules. Physical adsorption was proved by reducing the surface area of WDB, as the H2S molecules are captured by the high porosity. Coal fly ash and blast furnace cement were used in the synthesis of H2S adsorbent by Asaoka et al. [64]  With a component ratio of 87:13 and a calcination temperature of 700°C, it was possible to achieve adsorption capacities of 650 g-H2Sm−3 (62.15 mg H2S/g, calculated according to the density of average coal fly ash [65] and blast furnace cement [66]) under dry conditions and 730 g-H2Sm−3 (71,71 mg H2S/g) under humid conditions. These results were achieved as a result of H2S oxidation to sulfate, which is chemisorption. The adsorbent is capable of removing up to 99.1 % of H2S in both dry and humid conditions. Mbugua et al. [67] investigated the use of zeolitic rock from the Eburru deposit as well as other materials (maize cobs, steel wire, desulphurizer, and worn-out tyres) for the purpose of upgrading of biogas by removing CO2 and H2S. As a result of the polarity of CO2, zeolite rock demonstrated excellent performance; in contrast, desulfurizer was able to remove H2S at a rate of 97.78%. The presence of metals such as manganese, magnesium, iron, and zinc in zeolitic rock can be regarded as having certain characteristics. Although iron has a tendency to chemically react with H2S, Salimi et al.[68] studied the modification of adsorbents, namely, bentonite and sludge, with iron and copper to remove H2S and mercaptans from a refinery outlet gas. Depositions of Fe and Cu metals onto bentonite and sludge were proved by SEM–EDS analysis. The authors also explored the effect of the flow rate on the adsorption performance, concluding that a low flow rate is preferred. Regeneration of the adsorbent was done using gas and steam at 200 °C after three time cycles, with an adsorption capacity reduction observed. Iron-modified bentonite demonstrated a high adsorption capacity for H2S (32.256 mg H2S/g) and mercaptan (0.98 mg/g), whereas the copper-modified sludge had an adsorption capacity for H2S (11.18 mg H2S/g) and mercaptan (0.81 mg/g). Gasquet et al. [69] has recently attempted to examine and improve the H2S adsorption properties of sewage sludge-derived ash (SSA) and its modification with sand and activated carbon. Modification of SSA with 20% activated carbon showed an increase in the adsorption capacity of up to 186 mg H2S/g. Since elemental sulfur was observed by characterization techniques, the authors explained this by chemical adsorption due to reactional sites between HS- and oxygen that were created by the microporosity of the activated carbon. Various materials, such as sand (S) silica blue (SB), iron-exchanged sand (IES), zeolite 13X (Z), iron-exchanged zeolites (IEZ), and the waste material acid mine drainage sludge (AMDS), were investigated as H2S adsorbents in previous research [70]. Experiments were done using a gaseous mixture containing 100–1000 ppmv of H2S in N2 in a pilot lab setup at 25 °C. Characterization of adsorbents were analyzed before and after adsorption. AMDS showed a high H2S adsorption capacity of 312.73 g H2S/g compared to other adsorbents at a flow rate of 0.5 L/min, when the initial concentration of H2S was 1000 ppmv. However, as the flow rate increased, the H2S adsorption capacity decreased. The majority of waste-based adsorbents are composed of metals such as Fe, Cu, and Mg, all of which have a tendency toward chemisorption. Studies on the waste-based adsorbents were summarized in Table 7.
Table 7. Studies on the waste-based adsorbents.
Adsorbent TypeSelectivity/Adsorption CapacityReference
Halloyfill (halloysite based adsorbent)above 99% H2S removal (21.3 mg H2S/g)[61]
CaCO3-containing wastes
]
AC modified sewage sludge derived ash
186 mg H2S/g.[69]
Acid mine drainage sludge (AMDS)312.73 g H2S/g[70]

6. Conclusions

In the separation of H2S gas from gas mixtures, the presence of other gases in the mixture, such as CO2, H2O, and CO, complicates the process because of competitive adsorption. Therefore, it is very important to find and synthesize efficient zeolites with a high adsorption capacity, selectivity, and regenerability that can separate H2S under a variety of conditions. Natural and synthetic zeolites, and their modifications, are widely used in the separation of H2S from various gaseous mixtures. It is difficult to find the most effective adsorbent because there are so many different structural types of zeolites, modification possibilities, and conditions to consider when removing H2S. However, by understanding the properties of zeolites and the gas to be removed, the proposed zeolite or its modification can be assumed for the screening in the separation processes. Linde Type A (4A and 5A) and Faujasite (13X) zeolites with a low silica content, and their modifications with Cu and Ag, which have good adsorption properties, are very good candidates in this case. The adsorption of hydrogen sulfide by zeolites is considered to be physical adsorption in most cases. The modification of zeolites can increase their attraction to H2S, and this can sor the remetimes lead to the development of chemical adsorption. To date, many research attempts have explored the adsorption oval of H2S by modified zeolites using ion-exchange and impregnation methods, and very promising results are being obtained and their application is being proposed on an industrial scale. In recent studies, a NaX zeolite modified with a Ag+ cation has been suggested as a highly effective adsorbent in H2S removal. Moreover, adsorbents made from wastes, such as activated ash, bentonite, sewage sludge, and acid mine drainage sludge, have been proposed as effective H2S adsorbents. The adsorption capacity of AC-modified sewage sludge toward H2S is high, but their regenerative ability has not been investigated. Although a very high adsorption capacity of 312.73 g H2S/g of acid mine drainage sludge (AMDS) has been identified by Ahn et al.[70], this is somewhat far from the expectation. Because an adsorbent with such an adsorption capacity is not known to us, we have requested that the author [71] verify these statistics.

References

  1. Conference Paper
  2. Mokhatab, Saeid Poe, William A.. Handbook of Natural Gas; Gulf Professional Publishing: 225 Wyman Street, Waltham, MA 02451, USA, 2012; pp. 1689-1699.
  3. Mehtap Ozekmekci; Gozde Salkic; Mehmet Ferdi Fellah; Use of zeolites for the removal of H 2 S: A mini-review. FuelMoore, P.J.; Spitler, R.W. .; Hydrogen Sulfide Measurement and Detection. Processeding Technology s 20015, 3, 139, 49-60, 10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.08.015., 118–123.
  4. Mansi S. Shah; Michael Tsapatsis; J. Ilja Siepmann; Hydrogen Sulfide Capture: From Absorption in Polar Liquids to Oxide, Zeolite, and Metal–Organic Framework Adsorbents and Membranes. CheSittichai Kulawong; Ritchard Artkla; Preecha Sriprapakhan; Pisit Maneechot; Biogas purification by adsorption of hydrogen sulphide on NaX and Ag-exchanged NaX zeolites. Biomicass al Reviews nd Bioenergy 2017, 22, 117, 9755-9803, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00095.59, 106417, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2022.106417.
  5. Maryam Khabazipour; Mansoor Anbia; Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide from Gas Streams Using Porous Materials: A Review. IndParveen Kumar; Chun-Yi Sung; Oki Muraza; Matteo Cococcioni; Saleh Al Hashimi; Alon McCormick; Michael Tsapatsis; H2S adsorption by Ag and Cu ion exchanged faujasites. Microporoustri al & Engineering Chemistry Rend Mesoporous Materialsearch 20119, 58, 22133-22164, 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b03800., 146, 127-133, 10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.05.014.
  6. Amvrosios Georgiadis; Nikolaos Charisiou; Maria Goula; Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide From Various Industrial Gases: A Review of The Most Promising Adsorbing Materials. CatalyDavide Papurello; Andrea Lanzini; Maurizio Bressan; Massimo Santarelli; H2S Removal with Sorbent Obtained from Sewage Sludges. Processtes 2020, 10, 521, 10.3390/catal10050521., 8, 130, 10.3390/pr8020130.
  7. Donglai Mao; John M Griffin; Richard Dawson; Alasdair Fairhurst; Gaurav Gupta; Nuno Bimbo; Porous materials for low-temperature H2S-removal in fuel cell applications. SepFarideh Bandarchian; Mansoor Anbia; Conventional hydrothermal synthesis of nanoporous molecular sieve 13X for selective adsorption of trace amount of hydrogen sulfide from mixture with propane. Journal of Naturation and Purification Technolol Gas Science and Engineeringy 2021, 5, 277, 119426, 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119426.6, 1380-1387, 10.1016/j.jngse.2015.08.019.
  8. Moore, P.J.; Spitler, R.W. .; Hydrogen Sulfide Measurement and Detection. PLinda Barelli; Gianni Bidini; Luca Micoli; Elena Sisani; Maria Turco; 13X Ex-Cu zeolite performance characterization towards H2S removal for biogas use in molten carbonate fuel cells. Eneroceedings y 2003, 18, 1, 118–123.60, 44-53, 10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.057.
  9. Sittichai Kulawong; Ritchard Artkla; Preecha Sriprapakhan; Pisit Maneechot; Biogas purification by adsorption of hydrogen sulphide on NaX and Ag-exchanged NaX zeolites. Biomass and BioChunguang Liu; Rui Zhang; Song Wei; Jing Wang; Yang Liu; Man Li; Rutao Liu; Selective removal of H 2 S from biogas using a regenerable hybrid TiO 2 /zeolite composite. Fuenergy l 2022, 15, 159, 106417, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2022.106417.7, 183-190, 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.05.003.
  10. Parveen Kumar; Chun-Yi Sung; Oki Muraza; Matteo Cococcioni; Saleh Al Hashimi; Alon McCormick; Michael Tsapatsis; H2S adsorption by Ag and Cu ion exchanged faujasites. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 2011, 146, 127-133, 10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.05.014.Hydrogen sulfide . National Library of Medicine. Retrieved 2022-8-10
  11. Davide Papurello; Andrea Lanzini; Maurizio Bressan; Massimo Santarelli; H2S Removal with Sorbent Obtained from Sewage Sludges. Gabelman, A.; Adsorption Basics: Part 1.. Chem. Eng. Processes g. 2020, 8, 130, 10.3390/pr8020130.17, 113, 48–53. .
  12. Farideh Bandarchian; Mansoor Anbia; Conventional hydrothermal synthesis of nanoporous molecular sieve 13X for selective adsorption of trace amount of hydrogen sulfide from mixture with propane. JoLee D. Gasper-Galvin; Aysel T. Atimtay; Raghubir P. Gupta; Zeolite-Supported Metal Oxide Sorbents for Hot-Gas Desulfurization. Indurnal of Nastural Gas Science and rial & Engineering 20 Chemistry Research 15, 26, 1380-1387, 10.1016/j.jngse.2015.08.019.998, 37, 4157-4166, 10.1021/ie930439i.
  13. Linda Barelli; Gianni Bidini; Luca Micoli; Elena Sisani; Maria Turco; 13X Ex-Cu zeolite performance characterization towards H2S removal for biogas use in molten carbonate fuel cells. EnLaure Neveux; David Chiche; Javier Pérez-Pellitero; Loïc Favergeon; Anne-Sophie Gay; Michèle Pijolat; New insight into the ZnO sulfidation reaction: mechanism and kinetics modeling of the ZnS outward growth. Physical Chemistrgy Chemical Phy sics 2018, 2, 160, 44-53, 10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.057.5, 1532-1545, 10.1039/c2cp42988h.
  14. Chunguang Liu; Rui Zhang; Song Wei; Jing Wang; Yang Liu; Man Li; Rutao Liu; Selective removal of H 2 S from biogas using a regenerable hybrid TiO 2 /zeolite composite. W.F. Elseviers; H. Verelst; Transition metal oxides for hot gas desulphurisation. Fuel 20 15, 15999, 7, 183-190, 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.05.003.8, 601-612, 10.1016/s0016-2361(98)00185-9.
  15. Hydrogen sulfide . National Library of Medicine. Retrieved 2022-8-10Phillip R. Westmoreland; Douglas P. Harrison; Evaluation of candidate solids for high-temperature desulfurization of low-Btu gases. Environmental Science & Technology 1976, 10, 659-661, 10.1021/es60118a010.
  16. Gabelman, A.; Adsorption Basics: Part 1.. ChYoussef Belmabkhout; Prashant M. Bhatt; Karim Adil; Renjith S. Pillai; Amandine Cadiau; Aleksander Shkurenko; Guillaume Maurin; Gongping Liu; William J. Koros; Mohamed Eddaoudi; et al. Natural gas upgrading using a fluorinated MOF with tuned H2S and CO2 adsorption selectivity. Naturem. Eng. Prog. ergy 2017, 118, 3, 48–53. ., 1059-1066, 10.1038/s41560-018-0267-0.
  17. Lee D. Gasper-Galvin; Aysel T. Atimtay; Raghubir P. Gupta; Zeolite-Supported Metal Oxide Sorbents for Hot-Gas Desulfurization. IndustrL. H. De Oliveira; J. G. Meneguin; M. V. Pereira; J. F. Do Nascimento; Pedro Arroyo; Adsorption of hydrogen sulfide, carbon dioxide, methane, and their mixtures on activated carbon. Chemical & Engineering Chemistry Reommunicationsearch 201998, 37, 4157-4166, 10.1021/ie930439i., 206, 1533-1553, 10.1080/00986445.2019.1601627.
  18. Laure Neveux; David Chiche; Javier Pérez-Pellitero; Loïc Favergeon; Anne-Sophie Gay; Michèle Pijolat; New insight into the ZnO sulfidation reaction: mechanism and kinetics modeling of the ZnS outward growth. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2012, 15, 1532-1545, 10.1039/c2cp42988h.Database of Zeolite Structures . Database of Zeolite Structures. Retrieved 2022-8-10
  19. W.F. Elseviers; H. Verelst; Transition metal oxides for hot gas desulphurisation. FuMark E. Davis; Raul F. Lobo; Zeolite and molecular sieve synthesis. Chemistry of Material s 1999, 78, 601-612, 10.1016/s0016-2361(98)00185-9.2, 4, 756-768, 10.1021/cm00022a005.
  20. Phillip R. Westmoreland; Douglas P. Harrison; Evaluation of candidate solids for high-temperature desulfurization of low-Btu gases. EnviYafei Zhao; Bing Zhang; Xiang Zhang; Jinhua Wang; Jindun Liu; Rongfeng Chen; Preparation of highly ordered cubic NaA zeolite from halloysite mineral for adsorption of ammonium ions. Jouronmental Science & Technology al of Hazardous Materials 201976, 0, 10, 659-661, 10.1021/es60118a010.78, 658-664, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.01.136.
  21. Youssef Belmabkhout; Prashant M. Bhatt; Karim Adil; Renjith S. Pillai; Amandine Cadiau; Aleksander Shkurenko; Guillaume Maurin; Gongping Liu; William J. Koros; Mohamed Eddaoudi; et al. Natural gas upgrading using a fluorinated MOF with tuned H2S and CO2 adsorption selectivity. NJalil R. Ugal Sameer H. Kareem Sahar S. Hassan; Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of Zeolites A From Iraqi Cheap Raw Materials as Adsorbents for H2S Gas. J. of University of Anbatr for pure Ensciencergy 2018, 3, 1059-1066, 10.1038/s41560-018-0267-0.4, 8, 23-32.
  22. L. H. De Oliveira; J. G. Meneguin; M. V. Pereira; J. F. Do Nascimento; Pedro Arroyo; Adsorption of hydrogen sulfide, carbon dioxide, methane, and their mixtures on activated carbon. Chemical EngiRobert L. Bedard; Synthesis of Zeolites and Manufacture of Zeolitic Catalysts and Adsorbents. neering Communications ll 2019, 206, 1533-1553, 10.1080/00986445.2019.1601627.0, 1, 61-83, 10.1002/9783527629565.ch3.
  23. Database of Zeolite Structures . Database of Zeolite Structures. Retrieved 2022-8-10Abdul Khaleque; Masruck Alam; Mozammel Hoque; Shuvodip Mondal; Jahid Bin Haider; Bentuo Xu; M.A.H. Johir; Aneek Krishna Karmakar; J.L. Zhou; Mohammad Boshir Ahmed; et al.Mohammad Ali Moni Zeolite synthesis from low-cost materials and environmental applications: A review. Environmental Advances 2020, 2, 100019, 10.1016/j.envadv.2020.100019.
  24. Mark E. Davis; Raul F. Lobo; Zeolite and molecular sieve synthesis. Chemistry of MateriaRobert W. Broach; Zeolite Types and Structures. nulls 201992, 4, 756-768, 10.1021/cm00022a005.0, 1, 27-59, 10.1002/9783527629565.ch2.
  25. Yafei Zhao; Bing Zhang; Xiang Zhang; Jinhua Wang; Jindun Liu; Rongfeng Chen; Preparation of highly ordered cubic NaA zeolite from halloysite mineral for adsorption of ammonium ions. Hafez Maghsoudi; Mohammad Soltanieh; Simultaneous separation of H 2 S and CO 2 from CH 4 by a high silica CHA-type zeolite membrane. Journal of HazaMembrdous Materials ane Science 2010, 14, 478, 658-664, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.01.136.0, 159-165, 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.07.025.
  26. Jalil R. Ugal Sameer H. Kareem Sahar S. Hassan; Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of Zeolites A From Iraqi Cheap Raw Materials as Adsorbents for H2S Gas. J. of UStephen R. Dunne; Industrial Gas Phase Adsorptive Separations. niversity of Anbar for pure science ll 2014, 8, 23-32.0, 1, 273-305, 10.1002/9783527629565.ch9.
  27. Robert L. Bedard; Synthesis of Zeolites and Manufacture of Zeolitic Catalysts and Adsorbents. null 2010, 1, 61-83, 10.1002/9783527629565.ch3.Kulprathipanja, S. . Introduction; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010; pp. 1-26.
  28. Abdul Khaleque; Masruck Alam; Mozammel Hoque; Shuvodip Mondal; Jahid Bin Haider; Bentuo Xu; M.A.H. Johir; Aneek Krishna Karmakar; J.L. Zhou; Mohammad Boshir Ahmed; et al.Mohammad Ali Moni Zeolite synthesis from low-cost materials and environmental applications: A review. EHellmut G Karge; János Raskó; Hydrogen sulfide adsorption on faujasite-type zeolites with systematically varied Si-Al ratios. Journval of Colloironmental Advad and Interface Sciences 2020, 2, 100019, 10.1016/j.envadv.2020.100019. 1978, 64, 522-532, 10.1016/0021-9797(78)90394-6.
  29. Robert W. Broach; Zeolite Types and Structures. Annika Starke; Christoph Pasel; Christian Bläker; Tobias Eckardt; Jens Zimmermann; Dieter Bathen; Impact of Na+ and Ca2+ Cations on the Adsorption of H2S on Binder-Free LTA Zeolites. Adsorption Science & Technuoll ogy 20210, , 2021, 27-59, 10.1002/9783527629565.ch2., 1-12, 10.1155/2021/5531974.
  30. Hafez Maghsoudi; Mohammad Soltanieh; Simultaneous separation of H 2 S and CO 2 from CH 4 by a high silica CHA-type zeolite membrane. JouManolis M. Tomadakis; Howell H. Heck; Marwan E. Jubran; Khalid Al-Harthi; Pressure-Swing Adsorption Separation of H2S from CO2with Molecular Sieves 4A, 5A, and 13X. Separnal of Membranetion Science and Technology 20114, , 470, 159-165, 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.07.025.6, 428-433, 10.1080/01496395.2010.520292.
  31. Stephen R. Dunne; Industrial Gas Phase Adsorptive Separations. nRoghaye Dehghan; Mansoor Anbia; Zeolites for adsorptive desulfurization from fuels: A review. Fuel Processing Technol ogy 2010, 7, 1, 273-305, 10.1002/9783527629565.ch9.67, 99-116, 10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.06.015.
  32. Kulprathipanja, S. . Introduction; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010; pp. 1-26.Y. Yokogawa; M. Sakanishi; N. Morikawa; A. Nakamura; I. Kishida; H.K. Varma; VSC Adsorptive Properties in Ion Exchanged Zeolite Materials in Gaseous and Aqueous Medium. Procedia Engineering 2012, 36, 168-172, 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.03.026.
  33. Hellmut G Karge; János Raskó; Hydrogen sulfide adsorption on faujasite-type zeolites with systematically varied Si-Al ratios. Elena Sisani; Giovanni Cinti; Gabriele Discepoli; Daniele Penchini; Umberto Desideri; Fabio Marmottini; Adsorptive removal of H 2 S in biogas conditions for high temperature fuel cell systems. International Journal of CHydrolloid and Interface Science gen Energy 201978, 64, 522-532, 10.1016/0021-9797(78)90394-6.4, 39, 21753-21766, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.07.173.
  34. Annika Starke; Christoph Pasel; Christian Bläker; Tobias Eckardt; Jens Zimmermann; Dieter Bathen; Impact of Na+ and Ca2+ Cations on the Adsorption of H2S on Binder-Free LTA Zeolites. Adsorption Science & Technology 2021, 2021, 1-12, 10.1155/2021/5531974.
  35. Manolis M. Tomadakis; Howell H. Heck; Marwan E. Jubran; Khalid Al-Harthi; Pressure-Swing Adsorption Separation of H2S from CO2with Molecular Sieves 4A, 5A, and 13X. Separation Science and Technology 2011, 46, 428-433, 10.1080/01496395.2010.520292.
  36. Roghaye Dehghan; Mansoor Anbia; Zeolites for adsorptive desulfurization from fuels: A review. Fuel Processing Technology 2017, 167, 99-116, 10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.06.015.
  37. Y. Yokogawa; M. Sakanishi; N. Morikawa; A. Nakamura; I. Kishida; H.K. Varma; VSC Adsorptive Properties in Ion Exchanged Zeolite Materials in Gaseous and Aqueous Medium. Procedia Engineering 2012, 36, 168-172, 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.03.026.
  38. Elena Sisani; Giovanni Cinti; Gabriele Discepoli; Daniele Penchini; Umberto Desideri; Fabio Marmottini; Adsorptive removal of H 2 S in biogas conditions for high temperature fuel cell systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 21753-21766, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.07.173.
  39. H. Pourzolfaghar; M. H. S. Ismail; Study of H2S Removal Efficiency of Virgin Zeolite in POME Biogas Desulfurization at Ambient Temperature and Pressure. null 2013, 1, 295-301, 10.1007/978-1-4614-6208-8_35.
  40. Waseem Ahmad; Sumathi Sethupathi; Maizatul Syima Nur Noraini; Mohammed J. K. Bashir; Chin Yik Chun; Hydrogen sulfide removal using diatomite. 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT (ICENV2018): Empowering Environment and Sustainable Engineering Nexus Through Green Technology 2019, 2124, 020005, 10.1063/1.5117065.
  41. Abolfazl Atash Jameh; Toraj Mohammadi; Omid Bakhtiari; Mohammad Mahdyarfar; Synthesis and modification of Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework (ZIF-8) nanoparticles as highly efficient adsorbent for H2S and CO2 removal from natural gas. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2019, 7, 103058, 10.1016/j.jece.2019.103058.
  42. Elena Sisani; Giovanni Cinti; Gabriele Discepoli; Daniele Penchini; Umberto Desideri; Fabio Marmottini; Adsorptive removal of H 2 S in biogas conditions for high temperature fuel cell systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 21753-21766, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.07.173.
  43. M. J. Jafari; R. Zendehdel; A. Rafieepour; M. Nakhaei Pour; H. Irvani; S. Khodakarim; Comparison of Y and ZSM-5 zeolite modified with magnetite nanoparticles in removal of hydrogen sulfide from air. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 2019, 17, 187-194, 10.1007/s13762-019-02348-w.
  44. Nguyen Quang Long Vuong, Ho Thi Ha, Huynh Ky Phuong Kuniawan, Winarto Hinode, Hirofumi Baba, Toshihide; PREPARATION, CHARACTERIZATION AND H2S ADSORPTIVE REMOVAL OF ION-EXCHANGED ZEOLITE X. Asean engineering journal 2016, 5, 4-12.
  45. Xi Chen; Benxian Shen; Hui Sun; Guoxiong Zhan; Ion-exchange modified zeolites X for selective adsorption desulfurization from Claus tail gas: Experimental and computational investigations. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 2018, 261, 227-236, 10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.11.014.
  46. Ke Yang; Baihang Su; Lei Shi; Haiyan Wang; Qun Cui; Adsorption Mechanism and Regeneration Performance of 13X for H2S and SO2. Energy & Fuels 2018, 32, 12742-12749, 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b02978.
  47. Lijun Zhu; Xinfeng Lv; Shuyue Tong; Tingting Zhang; Yurou Song; Yongjie Wang; Zhao Hao; Chao Huang; Daohong Xia; Modification of zeolite by metal and adsorption desulfurization of organic sulfide in natural gas. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 2019, 69, 1, 10.1016/j.jngse.2019.102941.
  48. Piero Bareschino; Erasmo Mancusi; Annunziata Forgione; Francesco Pepe; Biogas purification on Na-X Zeolite: Experimental and numerical results. Chemical Engineering Science 2020, 223, 115744, 10.1016/j.ces.2020.115744.
  49. Freddy Manullang; Adrianto Ahmad; David Andrio; The Effects of Zn/Natural Zeolite Ratio and Adsorbent Calcination on H2s Adsorption in Biogas on the Processing of Palm Oil Mill Effluent (Pome). Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2019, 1351, 1, 10.1088/1742-6596/1351/1/012105.
  50. Soheil Bahraminia; Mansoor Anbia; Esmat Koohsaryan; Hydrogen sulfide removal from biogas using ion-exchanged nanostructured NaA zeolite for fueling solid oxide fuel cells. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 31027-31040, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.08.091.
  51. Joshua A. Thompson; Acid gas adsorption on zeolite SSZ ‐13: Equilibrium and dynamic behavior for natural gas applications. AIChE Journal 2020, 66, 1, 10.1002/aic.16549.
  52. Amvrosios G. Georgiadis; Nikolaos D. Charisiou; Safa Gaber; Kyriaki Polychronopoulou; Ioannis V. Yentekakis; Maria A. Goula; Adsorption of Hydrogen Sulfide at Low Temperatures Using an Industrial Molecular Sieve: An Experimental and Theoretical Study. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 14774-14787, 10.1021/acsomega.0c06157.
  53. Sabereh Rezaei; Maria Ophelia D. Jarligo; Lan Wu; Steven M. Kuznicki; Breakthrough performances of metal-exchanged nanotitanate ETS-2 adsorbents for room temperature desulfurization. Chemical Engineering Science 2015, 123, 444-449, 10.1016/j.ces.2014.11.041.
  54. Howell H. Heck; Merilyn L. Hall; Rudy dos Santos; Manolis M. Tomadakis; Pressure swing adsorption separation of H2S/CO2/CH4 gas mixtures with molecular sieves 4A, 5A, and 13X. Separation Science and Technology 2017, 53, 1490-1497, 10.1080/01496395.2017.1417315.
  55. Qi Bowen; Ying Chen; Yanju Li; Xiubo Tian; Luwei Ma; Study on the removal of hydrogen sulfide from natural gas by titanosilicite zeolite. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2021, 657, 012034, 10.1088/1755-1315/657/1/012034.
  56. Baghdad Science Journal; Adsorption of Hydrogen Sulphide on the Zeolite type A Synthezied from Iraqi Kaoline. Baghdad Science Journal 2013, 10, 1023-1033, 10.21123/bsj.10.3.1023-1033.
  57. Xinpeng Liu; Rui Wang; Effective removal of hydrogen sulfide using 4A molecular sieve zeolite synthesized from attapulgite. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2017, 326, 157-164, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.12.030.
  58. Leonardo Hadlich de Oliveira; Joziane Gimenes Meneguin; Marcus Vinicius Pereira; Edson Antonio da Silva; Wilson Mantovani Grava; Jailton Ferreira Do Nascimento; Pedro Augusto Arroyo; H2S adsorption on NaY zeolite. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 2019, 284, 247-257, 10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.04.014.
  59. Abdul Hadi Abdullah; Ramli Mat; Sathoshini Somderam; Azharin Shah Abd Aziz; Amri Mohamed; Hydrogen sulfide adsorption by zinc oxide-impregnated zeolite (synthesized from Malaysian kaolin) for biogas desulfurization. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 2018, 65, 334-342, 10.1016/j.jiec.2018.05.003.
  60. Xinpeng Liu; Rui Wang; Effective removal of hydrogen sulfide using 4A molecular sieve zeolite synthesized from attapulgite. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2017, 326, 157-164, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.12.030.
  61. Cebula, J.; Sakiewicz, P.; Piotrowski, K.; Sołtys, J.; Radosław, W.; Nowicki, M.; Application of the multifunctional halloysite sorbent HALOFILL TM for purifi cation of the complex multicomponent waste gas mixtures produced in selected biotechnological processes. Sorbenty Mineral 2015, 1, 37-51.
  62. Olumide Wesley Awe; Doan Pham Minh; Nathalie Lyczko; Ange Nzihou; Yaqian Zhao; Laboratory-scale investigation of the removal of hydrogen sulfide from biogas and air using industrial waste-based sorbents. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2017, 5, 1809-1820, 10.1016/j.jece.2017.03.023.
  63. Hua Zhu; Davide Papurello; Marta Gandiglio; Andrea Lanzini; Isil Akpinar; Paul Shearing; George Manos; Dan Brett; Ye Zhang; Study of H2S Removal Capability from Simulated Biogas by Using Waste-Derived Adsorbent Materials. Processes 2020, 8, 1030, 10.3390/pr8091030.
  64. Satoshi Asaoka; Hiroyuki Saito; Tsuyoshi Ichinari; Shinjiro Hayakawa; Takahito Oikawa; Removal of hydrogen sulfide gas using coal fly ash – blast furnace cement composite. Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development 2021, 11, 824-830, 10.2166/washdev.2021.091.
  65. Arpita Bhatt; Sharon Priyadarshini; Aiswarya Acharath Mohanakrishnan; Arash Abri; Melanie Sattler; Sorakrich Techapaphawit; Physical, chemical, and geotechnical properties of coal fly ash: A global review. Case Studies in Construction Materials 2019, 11, e00263, 10.1016/j.cscm.2019.e00263.
  66. Blast Furnace Slag Cement—Manufacture, Properties and Uses. . The constructor. Retrieved 2022-8-10
  67. James K Mbugua; Joseph M Mwaniki; Damaris M Nduta; Francis B Mwaura; Upgrading biogas using Eburru zeolitic rocks and other adsorbent materials to remove carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulphide. Tanzania Journal of Science 2021, 47, 421-431, 10.4314/tjs.v47i2.2.
  68. Omid Jalalvandi; Firooz Kheradmand; Farhad Salimi; Farhad Golmohammadi; Removal of H2S and Mercaptan from Outlet Gases of Kermanshah Refinery Using Modified Adsorbents (Bentonite and Sludge). null 2019, 8, 1-14, 10.22050/IJOGST.2018.110934.1429.
  69. Valentine Gasquet; Boram Kim; Anne Bonhomme; Hassen Benbelkacem; Sewage sludge ash-derived materials for H2S removal from a landfill biogas. Waste Management 2021, 136, 230-237, 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.10.023.
  70. Yongtae Ahn; Kalimuthu Pandi; Miyeon Lee; Jaeyoung Choi; Removing hydrogen sulfide from a feed stream using suitable adsorbent materials. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020, 272, 122849, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122849.
  71. Letter to the Editor
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Video Production Service
Feedback