Renal Primary neuroendocrine neoplasms: Comparison
Please note this is a comparison between Version 1 by MAYUR VIRARKAR and Version 2 by Conner Chen.

Primary renal neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare neoplasms. The 2016 WHO classification of renal tumors classified renal neuroendocrine neoplasms into well-differentiated NET, small-cell NEC, and large-cell NEC

  • neuroendocrine tumors
  • renal

1. Epidemiology, Presentation, and Pathogenesis

Primary renal NENs are rare neoplasms with around 100 cases reported in the literature, as per our knowledge (Figure 12) [1][3]. The 2016 WHO classification of renal tumors classified renal neuroendocrine neoplasms into well-differentiated NET, small-cell NEC, and large-cell NEC (Table 1) [2][4]. Renal carcinoid tumors, also known as well-differentiated NET of the kidneys, are rare, slow-growing neoplasms. They were first described by Resnick et al. in 1966 [3][4][5,6]. In a study by Hansel et al., the median age of presentation for renal NENs is 52 years, and the tumor equally affected male and female patients [5][7]. Primary renal carcinoid is the second most common genitourinary carcinoid tumor after testicular/ovarian carcinoids [6][8]. It is asymptomatic and incidentally detected in 25–30% of patients [4][7][6,9]. Typical symptoms of the carcinoid syndrome, including flushing, edema, and diarrhea, are uncommon and are seen in <10–15% of patients [3][8][9][10][5,10,11,12]. The incidence of small-cell renal NEC is rare; approximately 50 cases have been reported in the literature [11][12][13][14][15][13,14,15,16,17]. Most of the patients present at the age of 59 years with non-specific symptoms, such as hematuria, weight loss, and abdominal pain. There is no gender predilection, and the right kidney is more commonly involved than the left, with a ratio of 1.5:1 [11][13]. Evaluation with biochemical tests such as urinary–HIAA and serum chromogranin A and imaging is recommended to assess suspected NENs [16][18]. Death is seen in around 75% of patients within a year of diagnosis. Primary renal large cell NEC is an extremely rare malignancy; fewer than 10 cases have been reported in the literature [12][17][18][19][20][21][22][14,19,20,21,22,23,24]. Renal paragangliomas are rare, and to date, very few cases have been reported in the literature [23][25].
Figure 12. Illustration of renal neuroendocrine carcinoma. (A) T1: tumor limited to kidney and ≤7 cm in greatest dimension; (B) T2: tumor limited to kidney and >7 cm in dimension; (C) T3: tumor extending into the major vein or the tissue around the kidney; (D) T4: tumor growth beyond the Gerota’s fascia and may be growing into the adrenal gland.
Table 1. Morphological characteristics of renal NENs [24][25][26][27][28].
 Morphological characteristics of renal NENs [26,27,28,29,30].

2. Pathogenesis

There are many hypotheses explaining the cellular origins of neuroendocrine neoplasms in the kidneys: tumors (i) arise from renal stem cells that progress towards neuroendocrine lineage [16][18] or (ii) arise from entrapped neural crest cells in the kidney during embryogenesis [31][33] or (iii) develop alongside congenital abnormalities of the kidney [16][18] or (iv) are secondary to the metaplasia of pyelocaliceal urothelium resulting from chronic inflammation [24][26]. Renal NENs arises most commonly in individuals with congenital or acquired renal anomalies, such as horseshoe kidney (26% of renal NENs), polycystic disease, and mature cystic teratoma (15% of renal NENs) [32][33][34][35][36][34,35,36,37,38]. Krishnan et al. speculated that renal NENs arises from the already existing hyperplasia of neuroendocrine cells in the metastatic or teratomatous epithelium of the horseshoe kidney [32][34]. Primary renal small-cell NEC is a poorly differentiated tumor with a poor prognosis that is similar to small-cell NEC at other sites. Unlike renal parenchymal small-cell NEC, the ones arising from the renal pelvis are associated with urothelial or squamous cell carcinoma [15][37][38][17,39,40]. The origin of renal small-cell NEC is different from that of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. The pattern of chromosomal aberration can explain this. Gain of multiple chromosomes, loss of p53, and amplification of MYC are seen in small-cell renal NEC, whereas loss of the short arm of chromosome 3 (3p) is observed in clear cell renal cell carcinoma [26][28]. However, El-Naggar reported a loss of heterozygosity in chromosome 3p21 and suggested that this event is preliminary to all the renal neoplasms [39][41]. Renal paragangliomas are usually benign, and around 10% of patients encounter malignant transformation [27][29]. Classic cancer predisposition syndromes, including von Hippel–Lindau, multiple endocrine neoplasia type-2, and neurofibromatosis type 1 disease are associated with paragangliomas. Metastases are rare in VHL and MEN2 associated paragangliomas, whereas they may occur in 12% of NF-1 associated diseases [40][42]. The risk of metastases is high in succinate dehydrogenase subunits B (25–50%) and A (12%) [41][43].

3. Imaging

Ultrasound of renal NENs shows an iso-to hyperechoic mass with a peripheral anechoic or hypoechoic rim [9][10][42][11,12,44]. Computed tomography demonstrates a well-circumscribed solid, hypodense tumor with minimal enhancement in contrast-enhanced venous phase CT that corresponds to hypo- or avascular lesions on angiography (Figure 23Figure 34 and Figure 45) [16][43][18,45]. Heterogeneity and calcifications on CT can be seen in 60% and 26% of cases [7][31][9,33]. Around 75% of patients present with tumors > 4 cm, and >50% of patients demonstrate extrarenal invasion (perinephric, renal vein, or renal sinus fat) or distant spread of tumor [10][44][12,46]. However, differentiation is challenging, solely based on CT or MR imaging findings among renal NENs and renal cell carcinoma (Table 2). In addition, smaller carcinoids are difficult to visualize on conventional imaging. Octreotide scintigraphy complements CT or MRI and aids in diagnostic evaluation, staging, and follow-up of tumors and metastases with high sensitivity (85%) [11][45][13,47]. However, the major limitation is the uptake of tracer material by the normal renal parenchyma, obscuring the suspicious lesion.
Figure 23. A 36-year-old female with renal NENs. CT of the abdomen before (A) and after oral and IV contrast administration in (B) arterial, (C) porto-venous, and (D) delayed phases reveal a 5.3 × 3.9 cm partially calcified mass (arrows) arising from the left kidney, extending to the left perinephric space, and abutting the tail of the pancreas. Pathology revealed small-cell carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation.
Figure 34. A 45-year-old female with renal NENs. MRI axial T1 (A) in phase, (B) out of phase, (C) 3D axial, (D) T2, (E) T2 fat saturation, (F) coronal T2, (G) post-contrast dynamic, (H,I) dynamic subtraction images, (J) delayed postcontrast axial, (K) DWI, and (L) ADC show a large right renal mid and lower pole mass (arrows) measuring 6.6 × 7.1 cm showing central enhancing solid component with restricted diffusion and peripheral cystic component. Pathology revealed a neuroendocrine tumor. (M) Axial fused PET/CT images using Gallium 68 Dotatate show heterogeneously avid DOTATATE uptake of the mass (arrow), in keeping with biopsy-confirmed right kidney neuroendocrine carcinoma.
Figure 45. A 57-year-old female with renal NENs. CT scan of the abdomen before (A) and after oral and IV contrast administration in arterial (B) and porto-venous (C) phases reveal a right renal upper polar well-defined mass (arrow) with flecks of calcifications, measuring 5 × 4 cm encroaching on the right perinephric space without appreciable involvement of the right renal hilum. Pathology revealed well-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (atypical carcinoid).
Table 2. Imaging features of solid renal masses [46].
 Imaging features of solid renal masses [48].
Renal paragangliomas are more common in the kidney’s upper pole, and all patients shall have a biochemical evaluation before surgical resection [47][49]. Patients with hereditary syndrome-associated paragangliomas are more likely to develop multifocal primary tumors with varying degrees of metastases [48][50]. Paragangliomas are well-defined tumors with hemorrhagic and necrotic areas on CT, and calcification in 15% of cases [49][51]. On contrast administration, they exhibit intense homogeneous enhancement secondary to the tumor hypervascularity [49][51]. Since the MR resolution of tumors is better than that of CT, MR imaging has higher sensitivity in detecting liver metastases and blood vessel invasion [50][52]. In MR imaging, paragangliomas demonstrate low to intermediate signal intensity on T1-weighted, signal voids on T1-weighted spin-echo, and high signal intensity on T2-weighted imaging sequences [49][51]. Functional imaging, iodine 123 metaiodobenzylguanidine (I123-MIBG), is widely used to identify metastases and differentiate functional from nonfunctional paragangliomas.
I123-MIBG has high specificity (95–100%) but a low detection rate; the sensitivity ranges from 56 to 72% [51][52][53][54][53,54,55,56]. The application of PET/CT with 68Ga-DOTA peptides and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose has increased recently. PET/CT imaging with 68Ga-labeled somatostatin analogs such as DOTATOC, DOTATATE, and DOTANOC is being employed, and it targets the over-expressive somatostatin receptor subtype 2 in the paragangliomas [55][57]. DOTATATE PET/CT is the better imaging modality in patients with well-differentiated renal NENs. 18F-FDG PET/CT is superior to the 68Ga-based PET/CT, 123I-MIBG, CT, or MRI for high-grade NEC and detects the metastatic or recurrent tumors. It exhibits increased 18F-FDG uptake in SDH and VHL-related tumors and decreased uptake in MEN-2-related tumors. In addition, fluorine-18-labeled dihydroxyphenylalanine, a new tracer, was found to acquire images within hours; compare that to a day for an MIBG scan. The main limitation of FDG-PET is that its specificity is lower than that of 123I-MIBG and 111-In Octreoscan [56][57][58,59].
The diagnosis of NENs is based on histopathological and immunohistochemical characteristics of the tumor (Figure 56). Grossly, the renal NENs is solitary with well-delineated borders from the surrounding normal parenchyma and demonstrates solid (74% of cases) and cystic (49% of cases) surfaces, alongside focal calcification (30% of cases) and the occasional pseudo-capsule [45][47]. Usually, as the retroperitoneal space is highly distensible, the patients manifest with large tumor masses at diagnosis [31][33]. In their study, Hansel et al. described the average tumor size being from 2.6 to 17 cm. They reported that around 62% of patients demonstrated metastasis in regional lymph nodes or distant organs [1][5][3,7]. Hence, it can be said that the metastases are directly related to the tumor size in the renal NENs [1][58][3,60].
Figure 56.
 Treatment algorithm of renal malignancies.

4. Prognosis and Management

Renal NENs have higher survival rates than poorly differentiated renal NENs [1][3]. Age > 40 years, tumor size > 4 cm, extrarenal tumor invasion, purely solid surface, and >1 mitoses per HPF are the poor prognostic factors in patients with renal NENs [7][8][59][9,10,61]. In the presence of horseshoe kidneys, the carcinoids manifest indolent behavior [10][31][60][12,33,62]. Zhenglin et al. reported regional or distant metastases in 83% and a median overall survival of only 27 months in patients with renal NEC [1][3]. Patients with renal paraganglioma and metastases at diagnosis have 5-year survival rates ranging from 50 to 70% [28][30].
Surgery is the mainstay of treatment in renal NENs. The staging of renal NENs is described in Table 3 and Table 4. The standard treatment for localized primary renal NENs is nephrectomy with a lymph node dissection (Figure 67) [16][18]. As the surgery could be a prognostic factor, radical or partial nephrectomy is the treatment choice for localized or metastatic renal NENs [31][33]. Resection of the entire visible tumor is recommended in localized renal NEC. Rosenberg et al. described that, as carcinoids tend to be benign, partial nephrectomy or cryoablation of the tumor shall be the standard treatment; therefore, functional nephrons can be spared [61][63]. Chemotherapy and radiation have no proven benefit in managing NENs in general [11][13]. When indicated, open surgical resection shall be considered in the case of primary paraganglioma. Cytotoxic chemotherapy is recommended as the first-line therapy in patients with a high tumor burden (extensive metastases), symptoms, or rapid progression. Clinically used chemotherapeutic medications include CVD (cyclophosphamide/vincristine/dacarbazine) or temozolomide-based regimen. I131 MIBG therapy can be considered in patients requiring systemic treatment and who have MIBG-avid disease [28][30].
Figure 67. Well-differentiated NET (neuroendocrine tumor). (A) Grade 1 shows packets of neuroendocrine cells separated by fibrovascular tissue. (B) Ki67 immunohistochemical stain shows a proliferation rate of 1%. Grade 2 well-differentiated NET showing (C) trabecular architecture. (D) Ki67 immunohistochemical stain shows a proliferation rate of 15%. Grade 3 well-differentiated NET with a (E) solid and nested pattern. (F) Ki67 immunohistochemical stain shows a proliferation rate of 30%. Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma. (G) The tumor shows solid nests of poorly differentiated epithelioid cells with elevated nuclear size, pleomorphism, and dense chromatin. Notice there is necrosis in the center of the image. (H) Ki67 immunohistochemical stain shows a proliferation rate of 80%. Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (I) sheets of small to medium, round/oval, blue cells with minimal cytoplasm. The chromatin is finely dispersed. (J) Nuclei demonstrate molding. Ki67 shows a proliferation index of 80%. Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (K) with organoid architecture. Large cells (~3× size of small-cell carcinoma) are present with abundant cytoplasm, variably coarse chromatin, nuclear pleomorphism, and prominent nucleoli. (L) Ki67 immunohistochemical stain shows a proliferation rate of 90%.
Table 3.
 AJCC staging of renal malignancies.
 AJCC staging of paragangliomas [28].
 AJCC staging of paragangliomas [30].
Table 4.
Video Production Service