Scheduling for short-term load forecasting: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 3 by Alfredo Candela Esclapez and Version 2 by Alfredo Candela Esclapez.

At electrical power distribution networks, energy is consumed at the same time as it is generated, since its storage is unfeasible on large scale. Therefore, load forecasting is required by Transmission System Operators (TSO) to manage energy grid operations and supplies. Load forecastings are required very often everyday, then a lot of prediction calculations are executed during every forecasting interval. In Europe, owing to directives and new technologies, prediction systems will change from hour to quarter-hour intervals. Therefore, a predictive system may not have sufficientough time to compute all future forecasts. This article shows a tested solution to the computation time problem, while increasing accuracy of the If all future intervals cannot be predicted by a forecasting load system. The solution is based on making a , it will need a daily schedule, which establishes to decide which calculations must be execufuture intervals will be forecasted at eachvery moment of the day.

  • short-term load forecasting
  • computational burden
  • forecasting schedule
  • forecasting accuracy

1. Introduction

Short-term load forecasting (STLF) is required to manage production, distribution and economic operations of electric energy from the current hour to the following days. Every Transmission System Operator (TSO) needs accurate energy forecasts, otherwise it will suffer extra production costs with corresponding economic losses. In addition, accurate demand forecasts allow for managing electrical energy from renewable energies. Other entities require load forecasts to manage future operations, such as power marketers, independent system operators, or load aggregators.

Forecasting electricity load is a complex problem, which has been approached through various methods and from different points of view over the last few decades,. In which has led toconsequence, there is a great variety of forecasting algorithms implemented in different electricity networks. Many techniques are based on neural networks [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. Other algorithms use statistical methods [6] [7]. and Hhybrid systems that combine neural networks with other techniques are also common [8] [9] [10] [11].

1

 

2.1. Main Problem

TSOs require fast and frequent forecasts to read the results and manage the actions that adjust to future load. When operators with hourly intervals change to quarter-hour, they will have to forecast four times more values due to increase of intervals per day, they will also do this four times more often because of the reduced available time. This article addresses the problem of computational burden while increasing accuracy of the STLF systems already implemented.

The Spanish TSO, Red Eléctrica de España (REE), is working on hourly intervals. It needs forecasts for 19 electrical regions, which is 19 times more calculations than a single STLF system. Due to time limits for submitting predictions, it is not always feasible to calculate all future hours. Therefore, there is a schedule that determines which future intervals are predicted during each hour of the day. However, this schedule was not made with a reasoned basis.

The REE forecasting system cannot keep the previous forecasting schedule with quarter-hour intervals, since it is too computationally heavy to work within the new time restriction. Therefore, it needs a new schedule to forecast only the most useful intervals. A numerical criterion is required to define the usefulness of forecasts, in order to design a method which decides the better calculations to execute. As a result of that need, the main motivation of this work is to make a systematic method to optimize schedules.

 

13.2. Solution Approach

Previously, it was generally assumed that as we approach to the forecast moment in time, the forecast becomes more accurate, since the information available (weather and load) has more correlation with the forecasted load. However, this hypothesis does not always hold true. Sometimes, predictions calculated in the past are more accurate than recent ones. If the accuracy loss can be known in advance, then the unproductive forecasts made at these times can be canceled, saving computational effort and gaining accuracy.

All forecast calculations must be computed within a time limit; therefore, each computer has a number N of maximum predictions to compute. This limit depends on available time and computation speed, which depends on the computer itself and the forecasting algorithm used. In order to select the best N forecasts that can be calculated at each moment, a method to prioritize them needs to be developed. In addition, even if all predictions can be calculated, they may be counterproductive, since some of them have larger error than previous ones. Th

Alfredo Candela et al. [12] de papescr related to this article describes ibed, for the first time, an algorithm that makes the optimal schedule of forecasts, so that the system only computes new forecasts when an accuracy improvement is expected. Therefore, the work presents a systematic method to optimize schedules according to accuracy and computational burden. The mentioned work also presents a formula that numerically defines the value of predictions, in order to decide the best calculations to execute at every moment of the day.

2. Literature Review

 

4. Literature Review

The STLF field is extensive, since innumerable works have been published for decades; consequently, reviews of the state of the art have been published, such as those made by Mamum et al. [1213], Hippert et al. [1314], or Hong et al. [1415].

Other researchers [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] built and compared different STLF mathematical models employing error measures as performance indicators. After that, they did not consider how to apply those models in an optimized schedule, to avoid producing larger errors than past predictions that had already been calculated. J. Mohammed et al. [2223] did something similar, which also included reliability indicators to assess the model’s performance.

Another example is the work carried out by G. Veljanovski et al. [2324], in which they proposed a forecasting system based on a neural network. They did not consider the best time at which to obtain data and execute the computation. Weyermüller et al. [2425] built a minimalistic adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference model. It forecasts the load of one hour 24 h before, so this research could be applied to organize the calculation schedule if more forecast hours are added to the model.

The idea of opresent worktimizing the execution schedule could complement automatic forecasting systems, since it offers an automated eextra step at the end of the modeling process, in order to obtain an optimized execution schedulereduce computational burden and increase accuracy. An example of automatically modeled systems is the work conducted by L. Shufen et al. [2526], in which they proposed an algorithm to automate time series forecasting for nonexperts. The analysis proposed in this work could be applied to future works of theoretical research. For example, the research by T. Panapongpakorn et al. [2627] or the work by D. Shuai [2728].

Jiang et al. [2829] examined their model for different anticipation times; they also compared different STLF models, taking into account error and computation times. However, anticipation times varied just from 5 min to 16 h ahead and they were used to assess models, in the same way that calculation times were employed to compare entire models.

There is research which focuses on reducing computational burden, such as that by A. McIlvenna et al. [2930]. This research aims to optimize the use of a previously built forecasting system regardless of which one it is. With a different approach, M. Weimar et al. [3031] evaluated the improvement of a STLF system according to the economic savings with an econometric model. This is an example of how improving accuracy offers benefits that overcome developing costs.

3. Methodology

3.1. Forecasting system employed

TheApart STLF systefrom used in this research, as testing benchmark, is the developed by the University Miguel Hernández the paper related to this article (UMH) [812], which was implemented in REE. The system has been operating for more than 4 years, and during this time REE and UMH have continued to collaborate in continuous improvement efforts [31] [32].

3.2. Computation limit

The time a computer needs to calculate a set of predictions depends on three factors: the time that it takes to load new input data (I), the number of forecasts (n), and the time that it takes to make each prediction (P). So, the run time (t) can be modeled with the linear equation (1).

Variables I and P depend on the computer and code employed. At the beginning of each hour, the forecasting system loads new input data (temperatures and previous measured load). As mentioned before, due to the limitation of accuracy or computational burden, for each execution, there is a maximum number N of predictions that can be performed without exceeding the response time limit. Therefore, for each execution period, up to N predictions with greater value can be selected.

3.3. Algorithm employment

The result obtained by applying the proposed algorithm is a schedule, which defines the forecasts to execute at each hour of the day. The algorithm does not depend on the mathematical model used, but on the errors that it makes regarding historical records. In this way, it can be applied to any system that is organized by time intervals.

The Fighere is not previous work aboure 1 shows how to use and place the algorithm in a scheduling for forecasting system. First, the maximum number of predictions that can be calculated per interval is obtained, which depends on available time and computing power, as. The mentioned papers discussed[16] previously[17] at[18] equation[19] (1).[20] At[21] the[22] same[23] time,[29] the[30] previous[31] year can be predicted to calculate historical error records. Finally, the algorithm is applied to obtain a schedule that will serve to forecast load during the next year.

Figure 1. Process summary.

Other se the most similar works which tachedukling alternatives have been tested to compare the performance of the proposed algorithm. They are summarized in Table 1.

NameExplanation

Proposed algorithm

Employ the proposed algorithm to obtain a sechedule and then use it to forecast during the entire year.
Complete schedulePredict every future interval up to 9 days in advance, at every hour of the day (computationally unfeasible).
Current planningThe current schedule from REE.
Optimized algorithmEmploy the proposed algorithm, the with optimal number of calculations to minimize error.
Random selectionForecast a number, n, of random future intervals at each hour of the day.
Last-day selectionThis algorithm, at each moment, predicts the current day. It also forecasts the future day that has gone the longest time without updating, prioritizing those days which haver never been forecasted.

Table 1. Scheduling options.

4. Proposed Algorithm

To measure the e the prediction evalue of a prediction, a numerical indicator called accuracy improvement expection or the computation (AIE) is used. As the name suggests, it represents the expectation of improvement in accuracy of a predicted demand if it is recalculated. To calculate this parameter, historical records ofal burden, which is required to decide the most useful predictions calculated under the same conditions are used; that is, and then schedule the forecasts calculated at execution.    t

 

5. Computational burden

The same time of day with the same advance period.

The ia complemenuted algorithm prioritizes the hourlyr needs to forecasts according to larger AIE over the results of a full year, so only the best N forecasts will be executed in order to adhere to the time allowed. Before executing the algorithm, it is necessary to determine the number of maximum forecasts, N, that the computer employed can execute. This is determined empirically by its computational speed and the calculation time limit, as explained at equation (1).

5. Accuracy Results

T a set of future intervals depends on three variables: the time required to load new input data (I), the papnumber related to this article explains the tests to validate the proposed algorithm. The main test of future intervals to forecasts the year 2019 with every scheduling option, the accuracy average has been calculated for all the advances of all the hours of the year. In most advances, the optimized algorithm performs better than other methods. In addition, the Optimized Algorithm has a global improvement compared to the current schedule of the spanish TSO (n), and the time required to compute each prediction (P). So, the run time (t) can be obtained with the Equation (1). 

6. Computational burden

Last-dayAn selection and optimized algorithm compute predictions under 7 min and the first one requires less time. However, the optimized algorithm offers better accuracy in most cases.

Texample applied to this equation is the Spanish electricity system operator REE. It requires future load of 19 electrical regions. N, nowadays, the entire forecasting horizon spans up to 240 hours, thus the total of future loads that can be predicted extends to 4,560, which require 10.16 min. However, if the quarter-hour system is employed, the number of future intervals to forecast will multiply by four. This new system would entail 18,240 numbers to be calculated in 40.62 min, which is unfeasible since REE requires results before 7 min have passed.

According to Equation (1) and quarter-hour intervals, the maximum number of forecasts to compute in 7 min is 3,140. So, there is time to forecast 165 intervals in every electrical region. Therefore 165 is the maximum value that can be used on the algorithm as maximum number N of forecasts.

7

 

6. Conclusions

This article developed research offers an algorithm thatpresented the need for a method to organizes the calculation schedule of a STLF system for the entire along the day. The schedule obtained is must be adapted to the computational capacity of the computer while increasing the system accuracy. The methodology can ain idea could be applied to any forecasting technique, even if computational burden is not an issue because it has been proven that limiting the number of forecasts can be beneficial for accuracy, as it has been demonstrated for the case of REE.

On the other hSpand, according to results, theish TSO mai[12].

In contraddibution of the work is to reduce ttion, solving the computational load of a predictive system without sacrificing accuracy. This wiburden problem will allow a transition to the quarter-hour system with an optimal execution schedule. The study offeris article shows a first approach to improve forecasting systems through calculation planning. Applying a similar study to other time series prediction systems could improve them in a similar way. As future work, it is proposed to use the algorithm to plan the new quarter-hour system of the Spanish TSO.

References

  1. Weicong Kong; Zhao Yang Dong; David J. Hill; Fengji Luo; Yan Xu; Short-Term Residential Load Forecasting Based on Resident Behaviour Learning. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 2017, 33, 1087-1088, 10.1109/tpwrs.2017.2688178.
  2. Qifang Chen; Mingchao Xia; Teng Lu; Xichen Jiang; Wenxia Liu; Qinfei Sun; Short-Term Load Forecasting Based on Deep Learning for End-User Transformer Subject to Volatile Electric Heating Loads. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 162697-162707, 10.1109/access.2019.2949726.
  3. Dong-Xiao Niu; Qiang Wanq; Jin-Chao Li; Short term load forecasting model using support vector machine based on artificial neural network. 2005 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics 2005, 7, 4260, 10.1109/icmlc.2005.1527685.
  4. Singh, S.; Hussain, S.; Bazaz, M.A. Short Term Load Forecasting Using Artificial Neural Network. In Proceedings of the 2017 Fourth International Conference on Image Information Processing (ICIIP), Shimla, India, 21–23 December 2017; p. 5.
  5. Kunjin Chen; Kunlong Chen; Qin Wang; Ziyu He; Jun Hu; Jinliang He; Short-Term Load Forecasting With Deep Residual Networks. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 2018, 10, 3943-3952, 10.1109/tsg.2018.2844307.
  6. Pu Wang; Bidong Liu; Tao Hong; Electric load forecasting with recency effect: A big data approach. International Journal of Forecasting 2016, 32, 585-597, 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2015.09.006.
  7. Yang, L.; Yang, H. A Combined ARIMA-PPR Model for Short-Term Load Forecasting. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Innovative Smart Grid Technologies—Asia (ISGT Asia), Chengdu, China, 21–24 May 2019; pp. 3363–3367.
  8. Miguel López; Sergio Valero; Ana Rodriguez; Iago Veiras; Carolina Senabre; New online load forecasting system for the Spanish Transport System Operator. Electric Power Systems Research 2017, 154, 401-412, 10.1016/j.epsr.2017.09.003.
  9. Filippo Maria Bianchi; Enrico De Santis; Antonello Rizzi; Alireza Sadeghian; Short-Term Electric Load Forecasting Using Echo State Networks and PCA Decomposition. IEEE Access 2015, 3, 1931-1943, 10.1109/access.2015.2485943.
  10. Ma, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Ding, J.; Wang, Q.; Ma, J. Short Term Load Forecasting Based on iForest-LSTM. In Proceedings of the 2019 14th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), Xi’an, China, 19–21 June 2019; pp. 2278–2282.
  11. Oveis Abedinia; Nima Amjady; Hamidreza Zareipour; A New Feature Selection Technique for Load and Price Forecast of Electrical Power Systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 2016, 32, 62-74, 10.1109/tpwrs.2016.2556620.
  12. Abdullah Al Mamun; Sohel; Naeem Mohammad; Samiul Haque Sunny; Debopriya Roy Dipta; Eklas Hossain; A Comprehensive Review of the Load Forecasting Techniques Using Single and Hybrid Predictive Models. IAlfredo Candela Esclapez; Miguel López García; Sergio Valero Verdú; Carolina Senabre Blanes; Reduction of Computational Burden and Accuracy Maximization in Short-Term Load Forecasting. EEE Accnergiess 20220, 8, 134911-134939, 10.1109/access.2020.3010702., 15, 3670, 10.3390/en15103670.
  13. H.S. Hippert; Carlos Eduardo Pedreira; R.C. Souza; Neural networks for short-term load forecasting: a review and evaluation. Abdullah Al Mamun; Sohel; Naeem Mohammad; Samiul Haque Sunny; Debopriya Roy Dipta; Eklas Hossain; A Comprehensive Review of the Load Forecasting Techniques Using Single and Hybrid Predictive Models. IEEE TransaAcctions on Power Systemess 20201, 16, 44-55, 10.1109/59.910780., 8, 134911-134939, 10.1109/access.2020.3010702.
  14. Tao Hong; Shu Fan; Probabilistic electric load forecasting: A tutorial review. H.S. Hippert; Carlos Eduardo Pedreira; R.C. Souza; Neural networks for short-term load forecasting: a review and evaluation. InteEEE Trnational Journal of Forecaansactions on Power Systemsting 20016, 32, 914-938, 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2015.11.011., 16, 44-55, 10.1109/59.910780.
  15. Sethi, R.; Kleissl, J. Comparison of Short-Term Load Forecasting Techniques. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Sustainability (SusTech), Santa Ana, CA, USA, 23–25 April 2020; pp. 1–6.Tao Hong; Shu Fan; Probabilistic electric load forecasting: A tutorial review. International Journal of Forecasting 2016, 32, 914-938, 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2015.11.011.
  16. Jie-sheng, W.; Qing-wen, Z. Short-term electricity load forecast performance comparison based on four neural network models. In Proceedings of the The 27th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (2015 CCDC), Qingdao, China, 23–25 May 2015; pp. 2928–2932Sethi, R.; Kleissl, J. Comparison of Short-Term Load Forecasting Techniques. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Sustainability (SusTech), Santa Ana, CA, USA, 23–25 April 2020; pp. 1–6.
  17. Mehmood, S.T.; El-Hawary, M. Performance Evaluation of New and Advanced Neural Networks for Short Term Load Forecasting. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Electrical Power and Energy Conference, Calgary, AB, Canada, 12–14 November 2014; pp. 202–207Jie-sheng, W.; Qing-wen, Z. Short-term electricity load forecast performance comparison based on four neural network models. In Proceedings of the The 27th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (2015 CCDC), Qingdao, China, 23–25 May 2015; pp. 2928–2932
  18. Xiaorong Sun; Peter B. Luh; Kwok Cheung; Wei Guan; Laurent D. Michel; S. S. Venkata; Melanie T. Miller; An Efficient Approach to Short-Term Load Forecasting at the Distribution Level. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 2015, 31, 2526-2537, 10.1109/tpwrs.2015.2489679.Mehmood, S.T.; El-Hawary, M. Performance Evaluation of New and Advanced Neural Networks for Short Term Load Forecasting. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Electrical Power and Energy Conference, Calgary, AB, Canada, 12–14 November 2014; pp. 202–207
  19. Rafi, S.H.; Nahid-Al-Masood, N.-A.-M. Highly Efficient Short Term Load Forecasting Scheme Using Long Short Term Memory Network. In Proceedings of the 2020 8th International Electrical Engineering Congress (iEECON), Chiang Mai, Thailand, 4–6 March 2020; pp. 1–4Xiaorong Sun; Peter B. Luh; Kwok Cheung; Wei Guan; Laurent D. Michel; S. S. Venkata; Melanie T. Miller; An Efficient Approach to Short-Term Load Forecasting at the Distribution Level. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 2015, 31, 2526-2537, 10.1109/tpwrs.2015.2489679.
  20. Weicong Kong; Zhao Yang Dong; Youwei Jia; David J. Hill; Yan Xu; Yuan Zhang; Short-Term Residential Load Forecasting Based on LSTM Recurrent Neural Network. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 2017, 10, 841-851, 10.1109/tsg.2017.2753802.Rafi, S.H.; Nahid-Al-Masood, N.-A.-M. Highly Efficient Short Term Load Forecasting Scheme Using Long Short Term Memory Network. In Proceedings of the 2020 8th International Electrical Engineering Congress (iEECON), Chiang Mai, Thailand, 4–6 March 2020; pp. 1–4
  21. Shafiul Hasan Rafi; Nahid- Al Masood; Shohana Rahman Deeba; Eklas Hossain; A Short-Term Load Forecasting Method Using Integrated CNN and LSTM Network. Weicong Kong; Zhao Yang Dong; Youwei Jia; David J. Hill; Yan Xu; Yuan Zhang; Short-Term Residential Load Forecasting Based on LSTM Recurrent Neural Network. IEEE ATransaccess tions on Smart Grid 2021, 9, 32436-32448, 10.1109/access.2021.3060654.7, 10, 841-851, 10.1109/tsg.2017.2753802.
  22. Mohammed, J.; Bahadoorsingh, S.; Ramsamooj, N.; Sharma, C. Performance of exponential smoothing, a neural network and a hybrid algorithm to the short term load forecasting of batch and continuous loads. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Manchester Power Tech, Manchester, UK, 18–22 June 2017; pp. 1–6.Shafiul Hasan Rafi; Nahid- Al Masood; Shohana Rahman Deeba; Eklas Hossain; A Short-Term Load Forecasting Method Using Integrated CNN and LSTM Network. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 32436-32448, 10.1109/access.2021.3060654.
  23. Veljanovski, G.; Atanasovski, M.; Kostov, M.; Popovski, P. Application of Neural Networks for Short Term Load Forecasting in Power System of North Macedonia. In Proceedings of the 2020 55th International Scientific Conference on Information, Communication and Energy Systems and Technologies (ICEST), Niš, Serbia, 10–12 September 2020; pp. 99–101.Mohammed, J.; Bahadoorsingh, S.; Ramsamooj, N.; Sharma, C. Performance of exponential smoothing, a neural network and a hybrid algorithm to the short term load forecasting of batch and continuous loads. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Manchester Power Tech, Manchester, UK, 18–22 June 2017; pp. 1–6.
  24. Weyermüller, E.; Vermeulen, H.J.; Groch, M. Short-Term Load Forecasting using Minimalistic Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference Systems. In Proceedings of the 2020 International SAUPEC/RobMech/PRASA Conference, Cape Town, South Africa, 29–31 January 2020; pp. 1–6.Veljanovski, G.; Atanasovski, M.; Kostov, M.; Popovski, P. Application of Neural Networks for Short Term Load Forecasting in Power System of North Macedonia. In Proceedings of the 2020 55th International Scientific Conference on Information, Communication and Energy Systems and Technologies (ICEST), Niš, Serbia, 10–12 September 2020; pp. 99–101.
  25. Shufen Liu; Songyuan Gu; Tie Bao; An Automatic Forecasting Method for Time Series. Chinese Journal of Electronics 2017, 26, 445-452, 10.1049/cje.2017.01.011.Weyermüller, E.; Vermeulen, H.J.; Groch, M. Short-Term Load Forecasting using Minimalistic Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference Systems. In Proceedings of the 2020 International SAUPEC/RobMech/PRASA Conference, Cape Town, South Africa, 29–31 January 2020; pp. 1–6.
  26. Panapongpakorn, T.; Banjerdpongchai, D. Short-Term Load Forecast for Energy Management Systems Using Time Series Analysis and Neural Network Method with Average True Range. In Proceedings of the 2019 First International Symposium on Instrumentation, Control, Artificial Intelligence, and Robotics (ICA-SYMP), Bangkok, Thailand, 16–18 January 2019; pp. 86–89.Shufen Liu; Songyuan Gu; Tie Bao; An Automatic Forecasting Method for Time Series. Chinese Journal of Electronics 2017, 26, 445-452, 10.1049/cje.2017.01.011.
  27. Di, S. Power System Short Term Load Forecasting Based on Weather Factors. In Proceedings of the 2020 3rd World Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Intelligent Manufacturing (WCMEIM), Shanghai, China, 4–6 December 2020; pp. 694–698. Panapongpakorn, T.; Banjerdpongchai, D. Short-Term Load Forecast for Energy Management Systems Using Time Series Analysis and Neural Network Method with Average True Range. In Proceedings of the 2019 First International Symposium on Instrumentation, Control, Artificial Intelligence, and Robotics (ICA-SYMP), Bangkok, Thailand, 16–18 January 2019; pp. 86–89.
  28. Huaiguang Jiang; Yingchen Zhang; Eduard Muljadi; Jun Jason Zhang; David Wenzhong Gao; A Short-Term and High-Resolution Distribution System Load Forecasting Approach Using Support Vector Regression With Hybrid Parameters Optimization. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 2016, 9, 3341-3350, 10.1109/tsg.2016.2628061.Di, S. Power System Short Term Load Forecasting Based on Weather Factors. In Proceedings of the 2020 3rd World Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Intelligent Manufacturing (WCMEIM), Shanghai, China, 4–6 December 2020; pp. 694–698.
  29. Amelia McIlvenna; Andrew Herron; Joshua Hambrick; Ben Ollis; James Ostrowski; Reducing the computational burden of a microgrid energy management system. ComputeHuaiguang Jiang; Yingchen Zhang; Eduard Muljadi; Jun Jason Zhang; David Wenzhong Gao; A Short-Term and High-Resolution Distribution System Load Forecasting Approach Using Support Vector Regression With Hybrid Parameters Optimization. IEEE Trs & Iandustrial Engineering sactions on Smart Grid 2020, 143, 106384, 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106384.16, 9, 3341-3350, 10.1109/tsg.2016.2628061.
  30. Weimar, M.; Somani, A.; Etingov, P.; Miller, L.; Makarov, Y.; Loutan, C.; Katzenstein, W. Benefit Cost Analysis of Improved Forecasting for Day-Ahead Hourly Regulation Requirements. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Power Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM), Portland, OR, USA, 5–10 August 2018; pp. 1–5.Amelia McIlvenna; Andrew Herron; Joshua Hambrick; Ben Ollis; James Ostrowski; Reducing the computational burden of a microgrid energy management system. Computers & Industrial Engineering 2020, 143, 106384, 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106384.
  31. Miguel López; Carlos Sans; Sergio Valero; Carolina Senabre; Empirical Comparison of Neural Network and Auto-Regressive Models in Short-Term Load Forecasting. Energies 2018, 11, 2080, 10.3390/en11082080.Weimar, M.; Somani, A.; Etingov, P.; Miller, L.; Makarov, Y.; Loutan, C.; Katzenstein, W. Benefit Cost Analysis of Improved Forecasting for Day-Ahead Hourly Regulation Requirements. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Power Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM), Portland, OR, USA, 5–10 August 2018; pp. 1–5.
  32. Miguel López; Carlos Sans; Sergio Valero; Carolina Senabre; Classification of Special Days in Short-Term Load Forecasting: The Spanish Case Study. Energies 2019, 12, 1253, 10.3390/en12071253.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Video Production Service
Feedback