One Health Tomato Probiotics: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 4 by Sirius Huang and Version 3 by Astghik Zaven Pepoyan.

Based on the literature and knowledge on the “One Health” concept, a new term for probiotics: “One Health probiotics”, beneficial for the unity of people, animals, and the environment, is suggested.

Strains of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, having an ability to ferment a broad spectrum of plant carbohydrates, probiotic effects in human, and animal health, as well as being found in dairy products, vegetables, sauerkraut, pickles, some cheeses, fermented sausages, fish products, and rhizospheric soil, might be suggested as one of the probable candidates for “One Health” probiotics (beneficial for the unity of people, animals, and the environment) for the utilization in agriculture, food processing, and healthcare.

  • tomato
  • Lactiplantibacillus plantarum
  • “One Health” probiotic
  • agriculture
  • novel technology
  • healthcare
  • antibiotics' alternatives
  • dysbiosis treatment
  • natural alternatives for health

1. Introduction

Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) is one of the leaders in the classification of useful products. It is also one of the most popular and valuable vegetables in the world [1]. It contains many useful compounds, such as ascorbic acid [2], lycopene, β-carotene, anthocyanin, and others [3,4][3][4]. The content of trace elements and the above-mentioned compounds in tomatoes also create prerequisites for their use as components in various diets, and they can be used to reduce the risk factors of many diseases (cancer, osteoporosis, cardiovascular diseases) [1,5][1][5]. Wild tomato species and varieties have a rich potential for genetic diversity and greatly contribute to the selection of new, valuable genotypes with high productivity and an ability to adapt to stress. Despite researchers’ ongoing interest in transgenic crops [6[6][7],7], genetically modified crops, including tomatoes, can cause unpredictable environmental problems [8]. The selection of tomato varieties with valuable properties is a primary task for the researchers. Analysis in the field of breeding allows one to conclude that the genomic potential of tomato species is not fully used and there is a possibility of a wide choice of varieties. Tomato species have been supplemented with new, high-yielding varieties and hybrids, which are not only more resistant to diseases and pests, but also contain more vitamin C, total sugar, dry matter and acidity.
The most common products from the industrial processing of tomato fruit in the food industry are juice, tomato paste, various sauces, canned or sun-dried fruits and powdered products. Methods for obtaining various concentrates containing biologically active compounds (including carotenoids and lycopene) from tomatoes, as well as from the byproducts of their processing (pulp, skin and seeds), are well known [9]. Tomatoes are also a subject of interest for the cosmetic and perfumery industries when developing organic cosmetics line [10]. If a cosmetic contains individual components of tomatoes (lycopene, quercetin, salicylic acid, vitamin C, β-carotene), it will have a protective effect on skin from ultraviolet radiation and will slow down the aging of the skin by reducing the number of free radicals [11]. Due to the presence of sterols and vitamin E, tomato seed oil allows us to restore the protective barrier of the skin, thereby increasing its overall level of moisturization. Salicylic acid is effective in the treatment of inflammatory processes of the skin (acne). It has an antibacterial, keratolytic effect. In addition, lycopene stimulates the production of antioxidant enzymes that prevent the development of inflammation [12]. However, tomato fruits are susceptible to bacterial diseases, the intensity of the development of which depends both on the characteristics of the processing of the plant and on their general condition. In addition, bacterial contamination is a risk factor for the safety of processed tomato products, such as tomato juice and tomato paste.
One Health is the concept of the interconnection of human, animal and environmental wellbeing [13,14][13][14]. The concept focuses on interactions between humans and their environment as a trigger for health and disease mainly through the cycling of environmental microbial communities [15]. 

2. One Health Probiotics

Soil ecosystems contain and support the largest amount of biodiversity on the planet, which mostly consists of microorganisms that are beneficial to humans and animals. The One Health concept allows us to consider some infectious diseases from three sides: harm to the environment, their impact on human health, and their impact on animal health. In general, soil and the human gut contain approximately the same number of active microorganisms [116][16]. However, the diversity of the human gut microbiome is only 10% of soil biodiversity [116][16]. Based on this knowledge and the probiotic formulation [61][17], “One Health” or “universal” functional probiotics were previously suggested by Malkhasyan and Pepoyan as next-generation probiotics, beneficial to both humans and their environment [117][18].  It is assumed that “One Health” probiotic microorganisms belong to 10% of microorganisms common to the human gut and soil microbiome. It is likely that, first of all, “One Health” probiotics might be the result of the screening of a new generation soil/plant/animal probiotics from “human” probiotics. Table 1 presents the effects of lactobacilli probiotics (Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, L. acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus casei and Lacticaseibacillus paracasei, Lactobacillus delbrueckii, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus and Leuconostoc mesenteroides) on human, animal and plant health.
Table 1.
 Effects of lactobacilli species.
Probiotic Human Animal Plant (Tomato) Products Plant Soil
Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Food-associated Lpb. plantarum shows a good adaptation and adhesion ability in the gastrointestinal tract and the potential to affect host health through various beneficial activities [118][19]. Lpb. plantarum supplementation can modulate overall health and immunity [119][20] as well as gut microbial composition and the interaction network between gut microbiota and the immune system [120][21].The anti-Helicobacter pylori effects of the probiotic in the stomach tissue of C57BL/6 mice has also been described [89][22]. The use of this probiotic in the creation of fermented tomato juice products might be quite effective [113,114][23][24]. Lpb. plantarum is the main bacterial species associated with olive processing [121][25]. Probiotic tomato juice could serve as a health beverage for vegetarians/consumers who are allergic to dairy products [122][26]. This probiotic has been frequently found in environments associated with plants [123,124,125][27][28][29].Significant stimulation of germination in tomatoes with poor initial germination capacity was achieved by soaking their seeds for 6 h in suspensions of nine out of ten Lpb. plantarum strains tested [126][30]. This probiotic has highly antagonistic activities against most soil pathogens [37][31].
Lactobacillus acidophilus The beneficial role of this probiotic in regulating imbalances in human intestinal microbiota [127][32], as well as in improving overall human health, is well- known [128][33]. The probiotic participates in the biodegradation processes [129][34]. L. acidophilus supplementation can modulate overall health, immunity, and gut microbial composition [130][35] as well as the interaction network between gut microbiota and animal immune system [120][21]. Probiotic tomato juice, containing this probiotic could serve as a health beverage for vegetarians or consumers who are allergic to dairy products [122][26]. The probiotic might be used as a plant growth promoting agent [131][36].Probiotic-loaded edible films/coatings are known for maintaining safety, quality, nutritional and functional characteristics in fruits and vegetables for longer storage periods [132][37]. Gut lactobacilli modulate bioaccessibility in soil lead [133][38].
Lacticaseibacillus casei and Lacticaseibacillus paracasei The effects of these probiotics on skin [134][39] and the prevention of age-dependent cognitive decline by upregulating brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression in the hippocampus, as well as cAMP response element binding protein, were revealed in [135][40]. The Lcb. casei IMV B-7280 strain has a positive effect on the gut microbiota composition of mice [136][41]. Probiotic tomato juice could serve as a health beverage for vegetarians/consumers who are allergic to dairy products [122][26]. The effects of probiotic-loaded edible films/coatings on the maintainance of safety, quality and nutritional and functional characteristics of fruits and vegetables for long storage periods are known [132][37]. Furthermore, the effect of gamma-irradiated probiotics as an edible coating to enhance the storage of tomato under cold storage conditions is known [137][42].  
Lactobacillus delbrueckii The effects of this probiotic on immune responses in the elderly were described in [138][43]. The efficiency of this probiotic’s applications on pre- and post-radiation nutrition for rats were described in [48][44]. Probiotic tomato juice could serve as a health beverage for vegetarians or consumers who are allergic to dairy products [122][26]. Plant-originated L. bulgaricus was described by Michaylova and coauthors [139][45].  
Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus The effects of this probiotic on the modulation gut microbiota were described in [140][46]. The efficiency of this probiotic on pre- and post-radiation nutrition for rats were described in [48][44]. Fermented apple juice was the best substrate for the production of folic acid via Lpb. plantarum and Lcb. rhamnosus [141][47]. The effects of probiotic-loaded edible films/coatings on the maintainance of the safety, quality and nutritional and functional characteristics of fruit and vegetables for long storage periods are known [132][37].  
Leuconostoc mesenteroides The effects of this probiotic on the age-related decline in T cell-related immune functions were shown in [142][48]. This bacteria has great potential as a bee probiotic and could enhance the health of bee colonies [143][49]. This bacteria, being one of the predominant in the tomato surface microbiome, helps to control contaminate proliferation on tomato purée during storage at abusive temperatures [144][50]. The presence of this bacteria in raw fruits indicates the fact that the fruit is highly nutritionally and bacteriologically healthy [145][51].  
LABs, the representatives of different ecosystems on Earth, exhibiting dynamic interactions within the animal and plant kingdoms in relation to other microbes, evolved along with plants, invertebrates and vertebrates, establishing either mutualism, symbiosis, commensalism or even parasitic behavior with their hosts [146][52]. LAB strains, also one of the main probiotic candidates [147][53], have been used in the production of fermented food around the world since ancient times [148][54]. Lactobacillus species, having colonizing abilities in the phyllosphere, endosphere and rhizosphere, are also able to colonize the fruits and flowers of different plants, including tomato plants [149][55]. Moreover, the presence of Lpb. plantarum in raw fruits indicates the fact that the plant is highly nutritious and bacteriologically healthy [145][51]. According to Table 1, the food-related probiotic strain Lpb. plantarum [120][21], showing great adaptability and adhesion in the gastrointestinal tract of host organisms, may contribute to the improvement of host gut health [120][21]. Studies on tomato juice containing such bacteria have shown that this product can serve as a healthy drink for vegetarians or consumers who are allergic to dairy products [122][26]. The beneficial effects of the L. acidophilus [120,128[21][33][34],129], Lcb. casei and Lcb. paracasei [134[39][40][41],135,136], L. delbrueckii [45[43][56],138], Lcb. rhamnosus [45,140][46][56] and Leuconostoc mesenteroides [142,143][48][49] strains on human and animal health are known as well (Table 1). As with Lpb. plantarum, L. mesenteroides determines a fruit’s “health” [145][51]. Furthermore, strains of L. acidophilus might be usable as plant growth promoting agents [131][36]. Regarding lactobacilli comparative viability and folate production in apple, grape and orange juice, after 48 h, viable bacterial cells are highest in fermented apple juice, which is not only the best substrate for the growth of lactobacilli, but also for the production of folic acid by Lpb. plantarum and Lcb. rhamnosus [141][47]. Very little is known about the effects of L. acidophilus, Lcb. casei and Lcb. paracasei, L. delbrueckii and Lcb. rhamnosus strains on soil or the modulation of bioaccessibility of soil heavy metals (Table 1). Thus, Lpb. plantarum is a Gram-positive bacterium with a fairly large genome. It produces two isomers of lactic acid (D and L) during growth at 15 °C and 4% NaCl. Strains of Lpb. plantarum (and/or its bioactive products), having an ability to ferment a broad spectrum of plant carbohydrates [119][20], probiotic effects on human [67,150,151][57][58][59] and animal health [48[21][44][60],120,152], as well as being found in dairy products [152[60][61],153], vegetables [154][62], sauerkraut, pickles, some cheeses, fermented sausages, fish products [155][63] and rhizospheric soil [156][64], are probably the best candidates for “One Health” probiotics (and for “One Health—tomato” probiotics). According to Table 1, the strains of L. acidophilus, L. delbrueckii, Lcb. casei, Lcb. paracasei, Lcb. rhamnosus and Leuconostoc mesenteroides can also be considered sources of “One Health” probiotics (Table 1). It is likely to find “ready-to-use one health probiotics” in a range of probiotic strains, such as those found by Drs Erzinkian and Teruo Higa and other investigators. Despite the vital and useful features of this bacterium, a high concentration of Lpb. plantarum in food can be the cause of its spoilage. It can also cause the production of mucus, sourness and green coloring even in reprocessed goods. The formation of a moderate amount of mucus is also typical of Lactobacillus sakei [157][65]. L. lactis is a Gram-positive bacterium used in the dairy industry, which has homofermentative metabolism and generally produces L-(+)—lactic acid [158][66]. Nevertheless, in cases of low pH, D-(-)—lactic acid can be produced as well. On the other hand, L. lactis subsp. lactis, previous Streptococcus lactis [159][67], is used in the early stages of the production of various cheese types, including Brie, Camembert, Cheddar, Colby, Gruyere, Parmesan and Roquefort [160][68]. A high concentration of these microorganisms infuses milk and other dairy products with apricot flavoring [161][69]. Leuconostoc spp is a Gram-positive, heterofermentative lactic acid bacterium which is capable of producing dextran out of sucrose. Leuconostoc carnosum was first isolated from meat kept in a refrigerator. It affects vacuumed and cooked meat by causing rotting, changes in acidity and the formation of gas and/or mucus [162][70]. The influence of lactobacilli on the spoilage of wine is also well known. Furthermore, this bacterium can be the reason for the decomposition of cookies, the cause of which is the heterofermentative feature of malonic acid.  

References

  1. Xu, X.; Li, S.; Zhu, Y. Dietary intake of tomato and lycopene and risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality: Results from a prospective study. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 684859.
  2. Ntagkas, N.; Woltering, E.; Bouras, S.; de Vos, R.C.H.; Dieleman, J.A.; Nicole, C.C.S.; Labrie, C.; Marcelis, L.F.M. Light-induced vitamin C accumulation in tomato fruits is independent of carbohydrate availability. Plants 2019, 8, 86.
  3. Quinet, M.; Angosto, T.; Yuste-Lisbona, F.J.; Blanchard-Gros, R.; Bigot, S.; Martinez, J.-P.; Lutts, S. Tomato fruit development and metabolism. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1554.
  4. Abdelgawad, K.F.; El-Mogy, M.M.; Mohamed, M.I.A.; Garchery, C.; Stevens, R.G. Increasing ascorbic acid content and salinity tolerance of cherry tomato plants by suppressed expression of the ascorbate oxidase gene. Agronomy 2019, 9, 51.
  5. Bhowmik, D.; Kumar, K.P.S.; Paswan, S.; Srivastava, S. Tomato- a natural medicine and its health benefits. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2012, 1, 33–43.
  6. Yu, W.; Wang, L.; Zhao, R.; Sheng, J.; Zhang, S.; Li, R.; Shen, L. Knockout of SlMAPK3 enhances tolerance to heat stress involving ROS homeostasis in tomato plants. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 354.
  7. Askari, A.; Pepoyan, A.; Parsaeimehr, A. Salt tolerance of genetic modified potato (Solanum tuberosum) cv. Agria by expression of a bacterial mtlD gene. Adv. Agric. Bot. 2012, 4, 10–16.
  8. Pepoyan, A.Z.; Chikindas, M.L. Plant-associated and soil Microbiota composition as an important criterion for the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants. GM Crops Food 2019, 11, 47–53.
  9. Machmudah, I.; Winardi, S.; Sasaki, M.; Goto, M.; Kusumoto, N.; Hayakawa, K. Lycopene extraction from tomato peel by-product containing tomato seed using supercritical carbon dioxide. J. Food Eng. 2011, 108, 290–296.
  10. Papaioannou, E.H.; Karabelas, A.J. Lycopene recovery from tomato peel under mild conditions assisted by enzymatic pre-treatment and non-ionic surfactants. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2012, 59, 71–74.
  11. Tommonaro, G.; De Prisco, R.; Abbamondi, G.R.; Nicolaus, B. Bioactivity of tomato hybrid powder: Antioxidant compounds and their biological activities. J. Med. Food 2013, 16, 351–356.
  12. Szabo, K.; Dulf, F.V.; Teleky, B.E.; Eleni, P.; Boukouvalas, C.; Krokida, M.; Kapsalis, N.; Rusu, A.V.; Socol, C.T.; Vodnar, D.C. Evaluation of the bioactive compounds found in tomato seed oil and tomato peels influenced by industrial heat treatments. Foods 2021, 10, 110.
  13. Kahn, L. Perspective: The one-health way. Nature 2017, 543, S47.
  14. Winding, A.; Bach, E.; Mele, P.; Turetta, A.P.D.; Robertson, A.; Auclerc, A.; Pepoyan, A.; Cienfuegos, B.C.G.; Robb, C.; Janion-Scheepers, C.; et al. Chapter 3. Contributions of soil biodiversity to ecosystem functions and services. In State of Knowledge of Soil Biodiversity—Status, Challenges and Potentialities; Report; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2020; pp. 115–191.
  15. Van Bruggen, A.H.C.; Goss, E.M.; Havelaar, A.; van Diepeningen, A.D.; Finckh, M.R.; Morris, J.G., Jr. One Health—Cycling of diverse microbial communities as a connecting force for soil, plant, animal, human and ecosystem health. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 664, 927–937.
  16. Blum, W.; Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S.; Keiblinger, K.M. Does soil contribute to the human gut microbiome? Microorganisms 2019, 7, 287.
  17. Reid, G. The importance of guidelines in the development and application of probiotics. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2005, 11, 11–16.
  18. Malkhasyan, L.; Pepoyan, A. Antibacterial effect of the probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum strain ZPZ on the growth of Klebsiella preumoniae. Artsakh State Univ. Proc. Nat. Sci. 2021, 2, 209–215.
  19. Garcia-Gonzalez, N.; Battista, N.; Prete, R.; Corsetti, A. Health-promoting role of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum isolated from fermented foods. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 349.
  20. Suo, C.; Yin, Y.; Wang, X.; Lou, X.; Song, D.; Wang, X.; Gu, Q. Effects of lactobacillus plantarum ZJ316 on pig growth and pork quality. BMC Vet. Res. 2012, 8, 89.
  21. Foysal, M.J.; Fotedar, R.; Siddik, M.A.B.; Tay, A. Lactobacillus acidophilus and L. plantarum improve health status, modulate gut microbiota and innate immune response of marron (Cherax cainii). Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 5916.
  22. Asgari, B.; Kermanian, F.; Hedayat Yaghoobi, M.; Vaezi, A.; Soleimanifar, F.; Yaslianifard, S. The Anti-Helicobacter pylori effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus, L. plantarum, and L. rhamnosus in stomach tissue of C57BL/6 Mice. Visc. Med. 2020, 36, 137–143.
  23. Bah, A.; Ferjani, R.; Fhoula, I.; Gharbi, Y.; Najjari, A.; Boudabous, A.; Ouzari, H.I. Microbial community dynamic in tomato fruit during spontaneous fermentation and biotechnological characterization of indigenous lactic acid bacteria. Ann. Microbiol. 2019, 69, 41–49.
  24. Bah, A.; Albano, H.; Barbosa, J.B.; Fhoula, I.; Gharbi, Y.; Najjari, A.; Boudabous, A.; Teixeira, P.; Ouzari, H.I. Inhibitory effect of Lactobacillus plantarum FL75 and Leuconostoc mesenteroides FL14 against foodborne pathogens in artificially contaminated fermented tomato juices. Biomed. Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 6937837.
  25. Landete, J.M.; Rodriguez, H.; Curiel, J.A.; de las Rivas, B.; de Felipe, F.L.; Munoz, R. Chapter 12—Degradation of phenolic compounds found in olive products by Lactobacillus plantarum strains. In Olives and Olive Oil in Health and Disease Prevention, 2nd ed.; Preedy, V.R., Watson, R.R., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021; pp. 133–144.
  26. Yoon, K.Y.; Woodams, E.E.; Hang, Y.D. Probiotication of tomato juice by lactic acid bacteria. J. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 315–318.
  27. Kostinek, M.; Specht, I.; Edward, V.A.; Pinto, C.; Egounlety, M.; Sossa, C.; Mbugua, S.; Dortu, C.; Thonart, P.; Taljaard, L.; et al. Characterization and biochemical properties of predominant lactic acid bacteria from fermenting cassava for selection as starter cultures. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 114, 342–351.
  28. Escalante-Minakata, P.; Blaschek, H.P.; Barba de la Rosa, A.P.; Santos, L.; De Leon-Rodriguez, A. Identification of yeast and bacteria involved in the mezcal fermentation of Agave salmiana. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 46, 626–630.
  29. Trias, R.; Baneras, L.; Montesinos, E.; Badosa, E. Lactic acid bacteria from fresh fruit and vegetables as biocontrol agents of phytopathogenic bacteria and fungi. Int. Microbiol. 2008, 11, 231–236.
  30. Limanska, N.; Ivanytsia, T.; Basiul, O.; Krylova, K.; Biscola, V.; Chobert, G.M.; Ivanytsia, V.; Haertle, T. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum on germination and growth of tomato seedlings. Acta Physiol. Plant 2013, 35, 1587–1595.
  31. Daranas, N.; Rosello, G.; Cabrefiga, J.; Donati, I.; Frances, J.; Badosa, E.; Spinelli, F.; Montesinos, E.; Bonaterra, A. Biological control of bacterial plant diseases with Lactobacillus plantarum strains selected for their broad-spectrum activity. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2019, 174, 92–105.
  32. Pepoyan, A.; Balayan, M.; Manvelyan, A.; Mamikonyan, V.; Isajanyan, M.; Tsaturyan, V.V.; Kamiya, S.; Netrebov, V.; Chikindas, M.L. Lactobacillus acidophilus INMIA 9602 Er-2 strain 317/402 probiotic regulates growth of commensal Escherichia coli in gut microbiota of familial Mediterranean fever disease subjects. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 64, 254–260.
  33. Kerry, R.G.; Patra, J.K.; Gouda, S.; Park, Y.; Shin, H.-S.; Das, G. Benefaction of probiotics for human health: A review. J. Food Drug Anal. 2018, 26, 927–939.
  34. El-Abd, S.B.H.; Abu-Shady, H.M.; Elshebiny, H.A.F.M.; Ebrahim, M.A.A.; Sayed, H.A. Malathion biodegradation by L. casei (NRRL1922) and L. acidophilus (NRRL 23431) in fermented skimmed milk. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2021, 15, 1617–1624.
  35. Pepoyan, A.; Balayan, M.; Malkasyan, L.; Manvelyan, A.; Bezhanyan, T.; Paronikyan, R.; Tsaturyan, V.; Tatikyan, S.; Kamiya, S.; Chikindas, M. Effects of probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus strain INMIA 9602 Er 317/402 and putative probiotic lactobacilli on DNA damages in small intestine of Wistar rats in vivo. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2019, 11, 905–909.
  36. Lamont, J. Characterization of The Relationship Between Tomato and Lactobacillus. Ph.D. Thesis, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2017.
  37. De Oliveira, K.A.R.; Fernandes, K.F.D.; de Souza, E.L. Current advances on the development and application of probiotic-loaded edible films and coatings for the bioprotection of fresh and minimally processed fruit and vegetables. Foods 2021, 10, 2207.
  38. Bolan, S.; Seshadri, B.; Grainge, I.; Talley, N.J.; Naidu, R. Gut microbes modulate bioaccessibility of lead in soil. Chemosphere 2021, 270, 128657.
  39. Alves, E.; Gregório, J.; Baby, A.R.; Rijo, P.; Rodrigues, L.M.; Rosado, C. Homemade kefir consumption improves skin condition-A study conducted in healthy and atopic volunteers. Foods 2021, 10, 2794.
  40. Corpuz, H.M.; Ichikawa, S.; Arimura, M.; Mihara, T.; Kumagai, T.; Mitani, T.; Nakamura, S.; Katayama, S. Long-term diet supplementation with Lactobacillus paracasei K71 prevents age-related cognitive decline in senescence-accelerated mouse Prone 8. Nutrients 2018, 10, 762.
  41. Lazarenko, L.M.; Babenko, L.P.; Gichka, S.G.; Sakhno, L.O.; Demchenko, O.M.; Bubnov, R.V.; Sichel, L.M.; Spivak, M.Y. Assessment of the safety of Lactobacillus casei IMV B-7280 probiotic strain on a mouse model. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2021, 13, 1644–1657.
  42. Khalil, O.A.A.; Mounir, A.M.; Hassanien, R.A. Effect of gamma irradiated Lactobacillus bacteria as an edible coating on enhancing the storage of tomato under cold storage conditions. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 2020, 13, 318–330.
  43. Moro-Garcia, M.A.; Alonso-Arias, R.; Baltadjieva, M.; Benitez, C.F.; Barrial, M.A.F.; Ruisanchez, E.D.; Santos, R.A.; Sanchez, M.A.; Mijan, J.S.; Lopez-Larrea, C. Oral supplementation with Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus 8481 enhances systemic immunity in elderly subjects. Age 2013, 35, 1311–1326.
  44. Pepoyan, A.Z.; Manvelyan, A.M.; Balayan, M.H.; McCabe, G.; Tsaturyan, V.V.; Melnikov, V.G.; Chikindas, M.L.; Weeks, R.; Karlyshev, A.V. The effectiveness of potential probiotics Lactobacillus rhamnosus Vahe and Lactobacillus delbrueckii IAHAHI in irradiated rats depends on the nutritional stage of the host. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2020, 12, 1439–1450.
  45. Michaylova, M.; Minkova, S.; Kimura, K.; Sasaki, T.; Isawa, K. Isolation and characterization of Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus from plants in Bulgaria. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2007, 269, 160–169.
  46. Toscano, M.; De Grandi, R.; Stronati, L.; De Vecchi, E.; Drago, L. Effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 and Bifidobacterium longum BB536 on the healthy gut microbiota composition at phyla and species level: A preliminary study. World J. Gastroenterol. 2017, 23, 2696–2704.
  47. Espirito-Santo, A.P.; Carlin, F.; Renard, C.M.G.C. Apple, grape or orange juice: Which one offers the best substrate for lactobacilli growth?—A screening study on bacteria viability, superoxide dismutase activity, folates production and hedonic characteristics. Food Res. Int. 2015, 78, 352–360.
  48. Kuroda, R.; Higuchi, H.; Yoshida, K.; Yonejima, Y.; Hisa, K.; Utsuyama, M.; Osawa, K.; Hirokawa, K. Effects of chocolate containing Leuconostoc mesenteroides strain NTM048 on immune function: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Immun. Ageing 2018, 15, 29.
  49. Huang, Y.H.; Chen, Y.H.; Chen, J.H.; Hsu, P.S.; Wu, T.H.; Lin, C.F.; Peng, C.C.; Wu, M.C. A potential probiotic Leuconostoc mesenteroides TBE-8 for honey bee. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 18466.
  50. Sajur, S.A.; Saguir, F.M.; Manca de Nadra, M.C. Effect of dominant specie of lactic acid bacteria from tomato on natural microflora development in tomato puree. Food Control 2007, 18, 594–600.
  51. Naeem, M.; Ilyas, M.; Haider, S.; Baig, S.; Saleem, M. Isolation characterization and identification of lactic acid bacteria from fruit juices and their efficacy against antibiotics. Pak. J. Bot. 2012, 44, 323–328. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283803349_Isolation_characterization_and_identification_of_lactic_acid_bacteria_from_fruit_juices_and_their_efficacy_against_antibiotics (accessed on 1 March 2022).
  52. George, F.; Daniel, C.; Thomas, M.; Singer, E.; Guilbaud, A.; Tessier, F.J.; Revol-Junelles, A.M.; Borges, F.; Foligne, B. Occurrence and dynamism of lactic acid bacteria in distinct ecological niches: A multifaceted functional health perspective. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2899.
  53. De Filippis, F.; Pasolli, E.; Ercolini, D. The food-gut axis: Lactic acid bacteria and their link to food, the gut microbiome and human health. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2020, 44, 454–489.
  54. Amamoto, R.; Shimamoto, K.; Park, S.; Matsumoto, H.; Shimizu, K.; Katto, M.; Tsuji, H.; Matsubara, S.; Shephard, R.J.; Aoyagi, Y. Yearly changes in the composition of gut microbiota in the elderly, and the effect of lactobacilli intake on these changes. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 12765.
  55. Konappa, N.M.; Maria, M.; Uzma, F.; Krishnamurthy, S.; Nayaka, S.C.; Niranjana, S.R.; Chowdappa, S. Lactic acid bacteria mediated induction of defense enzymes to enhance the resistance in tomato against Ralstonia solanacearum causing bacterial wilt. Sci. Hortic. 2016, 207, 183–192.
  56. Kenneth, F.K.; Kriemhild, C.O. Cambridge World History of Food, 1st ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2000; Volume 1, p. 2153.
  57. Pepoyan, A.Z.; Pepoyan, E.S.; Harutyunyan, N.A.; Galstyan, L.; Tsaturyan, V.V.; Torok, T.; Ermakov, A.M.; Popov, I.V.; Weeks, R.; Chikindas, M.L. The role of immonobiotic/psychobiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus strain INMIA 9602 Er 317/402 Narine on gut Prevotella in familial Mediterranean fever: Gender-associated effects. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2021, 13, 1306–1315.
  58. Wang, J.; Ji, H.; Zhang, D.; Liu, H.; Wang, S.; Shan, D.; Wang, Y. Assessment of probiotic properties of Lactobacillus plantarum ZLP001 isolated from gastrointestinal tract of weaning pigs. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 10, 11303–11308.
  59. Nami, Y.; Abdullah, N.; Haghshenas, B.; Radiah, D.; Rosli, R.; Khosroushahi, A.Y. Assessment of probiotic potential and anticancer activity of newly isolated vaginal bacterium Lactobacillus plantarum 5BL. Microbiol. Immunol. 2014, 58, 492–502.
  60. Jose, N.M.; Bunt, C.R.; Hussain, M.A. Comparison of microbiological and probiotic characteristics of lactobacilli isolates from dairy food products and animal rumen contents. Microorganisms 2015, 3, 198–212.
  61. Agaliya, P.J.; Jeevaratnam, K. Screening of Lactobacillus plantarum isolated from fermented idli batter for probiotic properties. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 11, 12856–12864.
  62. Chang, M.H.; Hong, S.F.; Chen, J.H.; Lin, M.F.; Chen, C.S.; Wang, S.C. Antibacterial activity Lactobacillus plantarum isolated from fermented vegetables and investigation of the plantaricin genes. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2016, 10, 796–803.
  63. Vanderzant, C.; Savell, J.V.; Hanna, M.O.; Potluri, V. A comparison of growth of individual meat bacteria on the lean and fatty tissue of beef, pork and lamb. J. Food Sci. 1986, 51, 5–8.
  64. Singhal, N.; Singh, N.S.; Mohanty, S.; Kumar, M.; Virdi, J.S. Rhizospheric Lactobacillus plantarum (Lactiplantibacillus plantarum) strains exhibit bile salt hydrolysis, hypocholestrolemic and probiotic capabilities in vitro. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 15288.
  65. Marshall, D.L.; Bal’a, M.F.A. Microbiology of Meats. In Meat Science and Applications; Hui, Y.H., Ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 2001; pp. 159–163.
  66. Roissart, H.; Luquet, F.M. Bacteries lactiques: Aspects fondamentaux et technologiques. In Viability of Lactic Acid Microflora in Different Types of Yoghurt; Grenoble: Lorica, France, 1994; Volume 2.
  67. Chopin, M.C.; Chopin, A.; Rouault, A.; Galleron, N. Insertion and amplification of foreign genes in the Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis chromosome. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1989, 55, 1769–1774.
  68. Coffey, A.; Ross, R.P. Bacteriophage-resistance systems in dairy starter strains: Molecular analysis to application. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2002, 82, 303–321.
  69. Morgan, M.E. The chemistry of sorne microbially-induced Ilavor defects in milk and dairy foods. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1976, 18, 953–965.
  70. Björkroth, K.J.; Vandamme, P.; Korkeala, H.J. Identification and characterization of Leuconostoc carnosum, associated with production and spoilage of vacuum-packaged, sliced, cooked ham. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64, 3313–3319.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback