Reviewing Arch-Dams’ Building Risk Reduction: Comparison
Please note this is a comparison between Version 4 by Enrico Zacchei and Version 3 by Enrico Zacchei.

The are thousands of large dams over the globe. The importance of dams is rapidly increasing due to the impact of climate change on increasing hydrological process variability and on water planning and management need. This study tackles a review for the concrete arch-dams’ design process, from a dual sustainability/safety management approach. On one hand, Sustainability is evaluated through a design optimization for dams´ stability and deformation analysis. On the other hand, safety is directly related to the reduction and consequences of failure risk. For that, several scenarios about stability and deformation, identifying desirable and undesirable actions, were estimated. More than 100 specific parameters regarding dam-reservoir-foundation-sediments system and their interactions have been collected. Also, a summary of mathematical modelling was made, and more than 100 references were summarized. The following consecutive steps, required to design engineering (why act), maintenance (when to act) and operations activities (how to act), were evaluated: individuation of hazards, definition of failure potential and estimation of consequences (harm to people, assets and environment). Results show that the area to model the dam–foundation interaction is around 3.0 Hd2, the system-damping ratio and vibration period is 8.5% and 0.39 s. Also, maximum elastic and elasto-plastic displacements are ~0.10–0.20 m. The failure probability for stability is 34%, whereas for deformation it is 29%

  • concrete arch-dams
  • stability scenarios
  • deformation scenarios
  • safety management
  • sustainability assessment

0. Basic Information for Authors:

PlThere ase fill out the required information completely and carefully as your entry will be published directly after submission without peer review. Details can be found on the guideline re many factors, largely controlled by the structures size, that hinder sustainability in the field of dam engineering. In this sense, the height of the blocks can reach more than 100 m and the crown length can reach more than 500 m [1,2]. Dams with these dimensions are called “super-high dams” [3,4]. Then, the presence of structural elements [5], and their interactions, with different functions that increase the difficulty of calculation and modelling, e.g., the cantilevers that support and distribute the vertical loads and the arches that distribute the horizontal loads. Finally, the interaction of dam, foundation, sediments and reservoir sub-systems, requires not only the knowledge of the structural and hydraulic engineering, but also, other engineering areas are involved.

Three aspects, nage ( geometry, behaviour, and materials, comprise the internal and intrinsic actions, which exclude the external actions and their uncertainties of probability and occurrence.

1. These Euncyclopedia is completely free for contributorertainties are called “random” and are related to the magnitude of variability and inherent randomness. Besides these types of uncertainties, there are the “epistemic” uncertainties that are related to the lack of knowledge of materials and readers.

2.models [6]. Random and epistemic Euncertaintries can have more than one author whilies are studied in stochastic analyses, which are used to solve problems that cannot be deterministically solved because models are not known, or data are not available.

Due to the doubtstill in the draft phase. The creato of the input data, analyses, methodologies, and results, the concept of “risk” and quantitative risk assessment (QRA) is introduced through the following equation:

Risk = ∫[P(L,E) × P(R|L) × C(L,R)]


where can share editing rights with otheL = loads, E = events, and R = responses. P[R|L] is the conditional probability that R is true, given that L is true, and C stands for the consequences [7,8].

This integral is after saving the content of their entry measure of risk quantification based on the occurrence and probability of L, E and R, regarding the variability of extreme events, e.

3g., For some well-prepared entries, authors can apply for a DOI for the latest version and a discount voucher will be granted for flooding, hurricanes, earthquakes, explosions. The interest of the concrete arch-dams is proven by the fact that several studies have been published since 1931 [9]. This interest has generated several codes/manuals/reports [10–14]. Furthermore, several academic works with the following goal have been published. First, there are researches about the definition of the shape (volume and area of concrete) optimization, aimed to minimize the cost and the impact of the dam body on the environment [15–23]. Then, publications addressing the analysis of the dam behaviour under seismic actions accounting the enormous importance of the structure [24–33]. Finally, there are studies that consider the fact that the dam body is linked with the foundation base, water reservoir, and soil sediments [34–39].

However, there are some aspects, described apes follows, that are not well studied either synthetized or publication in MDPI.

1. Definition

Pshed in the literature. In this sense, the response estimation of arch-dams are not well studiease provide an accurate concept or description at the top and briefly highlight the importance or benefits for humans.

2. Introduction or History

Td or categorized, for example the effects of the non-uniform temperature variation due to the solar radiation and convective heat [30,40–44]. Furthermore, a good calibration between the theoretical and practical data is often difficult to obtain. In this sense, there is a lack of experimental tests made in the laboratory, which allow verifying the analytical and computational models. Also, there is a lack of practical experience of researchers and technical engineers do not easily accept the insighits part should account the development history in detail, including the origin, key breakof researchers. In this sense, some cases about real concrete arch-dams are listed in supplementary materials (see Appendix Table A1). Finally, but not least, there is a clear lack of academic papers that synthetize, integrate, and summarize most of the aspects involved in sustainability of concrete arch dam building. This review paper mainly aims to cover this deficiency, which comprises its main novelty too. This is performed herein by reviewing the existent knowledge on the development of sustainability and safety assessment throughs, current status, etc the study of structural stabilities/deformations and failure risk, respectively.

3. Data, Model, Applications and Influences

DThe rest of tails about which area the research applies to or what kind of problems it can solve. Your insights, or hypotheses if necessary, regardhis paper is organized as follows: Section 2 shows a background about the data and mathematical modelling. Section 3 describes some main key findings about an operating system and the project variables in a managerial context [7,12,14]. Section 4 is dedicated to the materials and methodologies followed in this research, describing the structure gand content of the different stages. Regarding materials, Random Variables (RVs) are showed; on the other hand, methods such as Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS), sustainability assessment framework and seismic hazard assessment are described. Then, section 5 comprises the description of results, largely addressing the research are also welcomedsustainability assessment of structural stability and deformations. Finally, section 6 is dedicated to show the main conclusions drawn from this research.


  1. Inventory of Dams and Reservoirs (SNCZI). . SNCZI. Retrieved 2020-1-13
  2. Spanish Association of Dams and Reservoirs (SEPREM) . SEPREM. Retrieved 2020-1-13
  3. Huang, H.; Chen, B.; Liu, C.; Safety monitoring of a super-high dam using optimal kernel partial least squares. Math. Probl. Eng 2015, 2015, 571594.
  4. Shi, Z.; Gu, C.; Qin, D; Variable-intercept panel model for deformation zoning of a super-high arch dam. SpringerPlus 2016, 5, 898–917.
  5. Zhang, Q.L.; Wang, F.; Gan, X.Q.; Li, B; A field investigation into penetration cracks close to dam-to-pier interfaces and numerical analysis. Eng. Fail. Anal 2015, 57, 188–201.
  6. Hariri-Ardebili, M.A.; Saouma, V.E.; Seismic fragility analysis of concrete dams: A state-of-the-art review.. Eng. Struct 2016, 128, 374–399.
  7. Hariri-Ardebili, M.A.; Risk, reliability, resilience (R3) and beyond in dam engineering: A state-of-the-art review.. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct 2018, 31, 806–831.
  8. Altarejos-García, L.; Escuder-Bueno, I.; Serrano-Lombillo, A.; De Membrillera-Ortuño, M.G; Methodology for estimating the probability of failure by sliding in concrete gravity dams in the context of risk analysis. Struct. Saf. 2012, 36–37, 1–13.
  9. Savage, J.L.; Houk, I.E.; Checking arch dam design with models. Civ. Eng 1931, 1, 695–699.
  10. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Arch Dam Design, Manual; USACE, Eds.; USACE: Washington, DC, USA, 1994; pp. 1110-2-2201.
  11. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE).. Theoretical Manual for Analysis of Arch Dams; Technical Report; USACE, Eds.; USACE: Washington, DC, USA, 1993; pp. ITL-93-1.
  12. International Commission on Large Dams (ICOLD).. Selecting Seismic Parameters for Large Dams; Guidelines, Bulletin; ICOLD:, Eds.; ICOLD:: Paris, 2016; pp. 148.
  13. Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety (FEMA).. Earthquake Analyses and Design of Dams; FEMA, Eds.; FEMA: Washington, DC, USA, 2005; pp. NC.
  14. International Commission on Large Dams (ICOLD).. Dam Safety Management: Operational Phases of the Dam Life Cycle; ICOLD, Eds.; ICOLD: Paris, 2017; pp. NC.
  15. Pouraminian, M.; Ghaemian, M; Multi-criteria optimization of concrete arch dams. Sci. Iran 2017, 24, 1810–1820.
  16. Kaveh, A.; Gha arian, R.; Shape optimization of arch dams with frequency constraints by enhanced charged system search algorithm and neural network.. Int. J. Civ. Eng 2015, 13, 102–111.
  17. Seyedpoor, S.M.; Gholizadeh, S.; Optimum shape design of arch dams by a combination of simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation and genetic algorithm methods. Adv. Struct. Eng 2008, 11, 500–510.
  18. Seyedpoor, S.M.; Salajegheh, J.; Salajegheh, E.; Gholizadeh, S; Optimal design of arch dams subjected to earthquake loading by a combination of simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation and particle swarm algorithms. Appl. Soft Comput 2011, 11, 39–48.
  19. Mahani, A.S.; Shojaee, S.; Salajegheh, E.; Khatibinia, M.; Hybridizing two-stage meta-heuristic optimization model with weighted least squares support vector machine for optimal shape of double arch dams. Appl. Soft Comput 2015, 27, 205–218.
  20. Zhang, X.F.; Li, S.Y.; Chen, Y.L.; Optimization of geometric shape if Xiamen arch dam. Adv. Eng. Softw 2009, 40, 105–109.
  21. Akbari, J.; Ahmadi, M.T.; Moharrami, H.; Advances in concrete arch dams shape optimization. Appl. Math. Model 2011, 35, 3316–3333.
  22. Shouyi, L.; Lujun, D.; Lijuan, Z.; Wei, Z.; Optimization design of arch dam shape with modified complex method.. Adv. Eng. Softw 2009, 40, 804–808.
  23. Gholizadeh, S.; Seyedpoor, S.M.; Shape optimization of arch dams by metaheuristics and neural networks for frequency constraints.. Sci. Iran 2011, 18, 1020–1027.
  24. Mirzabozorg, H.; Varmazyari, M.; Ghaemian, M; Dam-reservoir-massed foundation system and travelling wave along reservoir bottom.. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng 2010, 30, 746–756.
  25. Lamea, M.; Mirzabozorg, H; Simulating structural responses of a generic AAR-a ected arch dam considering seismic loading. Sci. Iran 2018, 25, 2926–2937.
  26. Wang, J.T.; Jin, A.Y.; Du, X.L.; Wu, M.X.; Scatter of dynamic response and damage of an arch dam subjected to artificial earthquake accelerograms.. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng 2016, 87, 93–100.
  27. Hariri-Ardebili, M.A.; Furgani, L.; Meghella, M.; Saouma,V.E.; Anew class of seismic damage and performance indices for arch dams via ETA method. Eng. Struct 2016, 110, 145–160.
  28. García, F.; Aznárez, J.J.; Padrón, L.A.; Maeso, O.; Relevance of the incidence angle of the seismic waves on the dynamic response of arch dams.. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 2016, 90, 442–453.
  29. Furgani, L.; Imperatore, S.; Nuti, C; Analisi sismica delle dighe a gravità: Dal semplice al complesso, se necessaio.. Proceedings of the XIV Convegno ANIDIS, L’Ingeneria Sismica 2011., Bari, Italy, 18–22 September, NC.
  30. Hariri-Ardebili, M.A.; Kianoush, M.R; Integrative seismic safety evaluation of a high concrete arch dam. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 2014, 67, 85–101.
  31. Hariri-Ardebili, M.A.; Mirzabozorg, H.; Kianoush, R; Comparative study of endurance time and time history methods in seismic analysis of high arch dams.. Int. J. Civ. Eng 2014, 12, 219–236.
  32. Chen, B.F.; Yuan, Y.S; Nonlinear hydrodynamic pressures on rigid arch dams during earthquakes. Proceedings of the 12 WCEE 2000, 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering 2000., New Zeland, 30 January–4 February, NC.
  33. Schultz, M.; Huynh, P.; Cvijanovic, V.; Implementing nonlinear analysis of concrete dams and soil-structure interaction under extreme seismic loading. Proceedings of the 34th AnnualUSSDConference 2014., San Francisco, CA, USA, 7–11 April, NC.
  34. Khosravi, S.; Heydari, M.M.; Modelling of concrete gravity dam including dam-water-foundation rock interaction. World Appl. Sci. J. 2013, 22, 538–546.
  35. Alegre, A.; Oliveira, S.; Ramos, R.; Espada, M.; Resposta sísmica de barragens abobada. Estudo numérico sobre a influência da cota de água na albufeira.. Proceedings of the Encontro Nacional Betão Estrutural 2018, BE2018, NC.
  36. Seyedpoor, S.M.; Salajegheh, J.; Salajegheh, E; Shape optimal design of arch dams including dam-water-foundation rock interaction using a grading strategy and approximation concepts. Appl. Math. Model. 2010, 34, 1149–1163.
  37. Mirzabozorg, H.; Kordzadeh, A.; Hariri-Ardebili, M.A.; Seismic response of concrete arch dams including dam-reservoir-foundation interaction using infinite elements. Electron. J. Struct. Eng. 2012, 12, 63–73.
  38. Proulx, J.; Paultre, P.; Experimental and numerical investigation of dam-reservoir-foundation interaction for a large gravity dam. Can. J. Civ. Eng 1997, 25, 90–105.
  39. Akköse, M.; Adanur, S.; Bayraktar, A.; Dumano˘ glu, A.A.; Elasto-plastic earthquake response of arch dams including fluid-structure interaction by the Lagrangian approach. Appl. Math. Model 2008, 32, 2396–2412.
  40. Hariri-Ardebili, M.A.; Seyed-Kolbadi, S.M.; Seismic cracking and instability of concrete dams: Smeared crack approach. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2015, 52, 45–60.
  41. Demirel, E.; Numerical simulation of earthquake excited dam-reservoirs with irregular geometries using an immersed boundary method. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 2015, 73, 80–90.
  42. Li, Q.; Guan, J.; Wu, Z.; Dong,W.; Zhou, S.; Equivalent maturity for ambient temperature e ect on fracture parameters of site-casting dam concrete.. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 120, 293–308.
  43. Shi, N.; Chen, Y.; Li, Z; Crack risk evaluation of early age concrete based on the distributed optical fiber temperature sensing. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 2016, 4082926.
  44. Jin, F.; Chen, Z.; Wang, J.; Yang, J.; Practical procedure for predicting non-uniform temperature on the exposed face of arch dams.. Appl. Therm. Eng 2010, 30, 2146–2156.