Encyclopedia
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Amina Yu and Version 1 by Francisco Perez-Pinal.
IThe design aof magnetic component, the core is the key to determine its s is the key to achieving two purposes. The design parameters are intimately dependent on geometric structure, excitation conditions, and magnetic properties and performance. So to achieve an optimalsuch as power losses that determine if a core magnetic is suitable to be part of a magnetic component’s performance, the core losses effects must be characterized. Power losses in magnetic components are important design parameters; which limit many high-frequency designs.
- core losses methods
- power losses
- ferromagnetic material
- inductors
- transformers
1. Ferromagnetic Alloys
Ferromagnetic materials are exciting materials, where several of their physical properties and chemical micro-structure allow being controlled. Susceptibilities, permeabilities, the shape of the hysteresis loop, power loss, coercivity, remanence, and magnetic induction are some examples of no intrinsic properties [18][1]. The saturation magnetization and the Curie temperature are the only intrinsic properties [17,18][2][1].
The magnetic behavior is ruled by the dipole moments’ interaction of their atoms within an external magnetic field [28][3]. Ferromagnetic materials have strong magnetic properties due to their magnetic moments that tend to line up easily along an outward magnetic field direction [29][4]. These materials also have the property of remaining partially magnetized even when the external magnetic field is removed; this means that they can quickly change their magnetic polarization by applying a small field. Ferromagnetic materials are also profitable materials due to being composed by Fe, one of the eight more abundant elements on Earth [30][5].
Ferromagnetic materials are used in the core of magnetic components; they are classified in Fe-Si alloys, powder cores, amorphous material, and nanocrystalline material; on the other hand, materials as silver, gold, copper, aluminium, iron, steel, among others, are used in windings Figure 1. Except for powder cores, the rest of them are rolled materials [31][6]; in the following sections, the importance of this fact in the core losses calculation will be detailed. Each one has specific magnetic properties, manufacturing processes, and physical features that determine its feasibility [32][7].
Figure 1. Ferromagnetic and conductor materials types. Source: Adapted from [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43].
Fe-Si alloys are alloys based on Fe with small quantities of Si (not more than 4.5%). These alloys are attractive due to their reasonable cost and magnetic properties [44][19]. There are two kinds: grain non-oriented sheets (GNO) and grain-oriented sheets (GO) [30][5]. At present, GO material represents 80% of the electrical devices market [17,45][2][20].
On the other hand, powder cores are fabricated from metallic powders, typically iron; however, those can be composed of alloys with P, Si and Co [46][21]. The manufacturing process of this kind of material allows special fabrication geometry cores. Usually, powder cores are mixed with a binder or insulating material to reduce magnetic losses at high frequencies [47][22]. According to the material used in their fabrication, those can be classified into four groups: iron powder core, molybdenum permalloy powder cores (MPP), high flux powder cores, and sendust cores, also called Kool Mμ
Amorphous alloys or metallic glasses are materials without crystalline order [50][25]. Those alloys are very strong and hard, but also ductile. They contain approximately 80% of particles of Fe, Ni, Co, and their combinations; and 20% of metalloids particles or glass formed elements (C, Al, B, Si, and P) [51,52][26][27].
Nanocrystalline alloys consist of a Fe-Si ultra-thin grain alloy with a few quantities of Cu and Nb. Their manufacturing process is very similar to amorphous alloys [53][28]. Nanocrystals are materials with high mechanical hardness and extremely fragile. The four main kinds are: finemet, nanoperm, hitperm, and nanomet [54,55][29][30].
Nanocrystalline, amorphous and Fe-Si alloys are the materials more used in power electronics, so they have been widely studied, especially in terms of core power losses. In rolled materials as Fe-Si alloys and amorphous materials, their magnetic properties depend on the sheet’s thickness (around a few mm, and 5–50 μ
μm, respectively). Instead, in nanocrystalline alloys, magnetic properties depend on the diameter of their grains (of the order of 10–15 nm). Rolled materials are susceptible to Eddy currents and skin losses. In contrast, powder cores’ magnetic properties can be manipulated during their manufacturing process, which includes the relative permeability variation according to the magnetic field intensity, high saturation point, fringing flux elimination, soft saturation, among others.
2. Losses in Magnetic Components
To any magnetic component designer, a real challenge to overcome is getting a magnetic component with high efficiency, small size, low cost, convenience, and low losses [56][31]. Usually, losses are the common factor in all requirements announced before; losses are the most difficult challenges to beat in a magnetic component.
Losses in a magnetic component are divided in two groups: core losses and winding losses (also called copper losses), [57][32]. Figure 2It was showsed each one of them, as well as their causing phenomena, methods, models, techniques and elements associated with them; nonetheless, phenomena such as the fringing effect and the flux linkage many times are not considered in the losses model. Still, they are necessary to achieve a complete losses model in any magnetic component.
Figure 2. Types and classification of losses presented on magnetic components. Source: Adapted from [58].
Current windings generate the flux linkage density; therefore, it is the sum of the flux enclosed of each one of the turns wound around the core, the flux linkage linked them [50,59][25][34]. Flux linkage depends on the conductor’s geometry and the quantity of flux contained in it. In the gap between windings is the maximum flux linkage [60,61,62][35][36][37].
Otherwise, the fringing effect is the counterpart of flux linkage; this is, the fringing effect is presented around the air gap instead of the windings of the magnetic component. This phenomenon depends on core geometry and core permeability, to higher permeability the fringing effect is low [50][25].
The copper losses are caused by the flow of direct current (DC and AC) and alternating current(AC) through the windings of a magnetic component, where losses always are more significant for AC than DC [63,64][38][39]. The circulating current in the windings generates Eddy phenomena as Eddy currents, skin effect loss and, proximity effect loss.
The skin effect and the proximity effect loss are linked to the conductor size, frequency, permeability and distance between winding wires. For the first of them, the current distribution trough the cross-area of the wire will define the current density in it. The skin effect and the proximity effect loss are linked to the winding wires. For the first of them, the current distribution through the cross-area of the wire will define the current density in it. It means that the conductor will have a uniform distribution for DC, higher on its surface and lower in its center for AC distribution [65][40].
The proximity effect is similar to the skin effect, but in this case, it is generated by the current carried nearby conductors [50,65][25][40]. Eddy currents are induced in a wire in this kind of loss due to a variant magnetic field in the vicinity of conductors at high frequency [46,66][21][41].
The Litz wire and interleaved windings help minimize winding losses in magnetic components, both are widely used currently. Indeed, interleaved windings are very efficient in high-frequency planar magnetics [67,68][42][43].
On the other hand, core losses directly depend on the intrinsic and extrinsic core materials’ characteristics. Core losses are related to hysteresis loop, Eddy currents, and anomalous or residual losses. Without matter, the core losses model chosen by the magnetic component designer will be based on those three primary losses; core loss models will be detailed in the next section. Besides, core losses depend on the core’s geometry and the core intrinsic properties’ such as permeability, flux density, Curie temperature, among others [69,70,71][44][45][46]. Many methods and models have been developed; all of them have the predominant interest in studying, analyzing and understanding those kinds of losses to improve the magnetic components’ performance.
3. General Core Losses Models
In a magnetic component, the core is the key to determine its magnetic properties and performance [72][47]. So to achieve an optimal magnetic component’s performance, the core losses effects must be characterized [73][48].
-
Relative permeability.
-
Magnetic saturation point.
-
Temperature operation range.
-
AC excitation frequency and amplitude.
-
Voltages’ waveform.
-
DC bias.
-
Magnetization process.
-
Peak-to-peak value of magnetic flux density.
In the case of the magnetization process, some factors are instantaneous values and time variation values. While to waveform’s topic, the duty ratio of the excitation waveform also influence the core loss [76,77][51][52].
Generally, the core loss is provided at a specific frequency and a maximum flux density [78][53]. The variation frequency effect in ferromagnetic materials is related to Eddy currents and the wall-domain displacement [72][47].
Core losses in ferrimagnetic and ferromagnetic materials are similar. Both have losses due to Eddy currents, hysteresis, and anomalous; however, there are differences concerning flux density, magnetization process, and hysteresis loop shape that define the magnetic behavior of each one.
The hysteresis is one of the principal features of ferromagnetic materials; it describes the internal magnetization of magnetic components as a function of external magnetizing force and magnetization history [79][54]. The source of hysteresis loss is the domain wall movement and the magnetic domains’ reorientations [80,81][55][56].
The hysteresis loss is defined as power loss in each cycle of magnetization and demagnetization into a ferromagnetic material [82][57]. If a magnetic sample is excited from zero to the maximum field value and later comes back at the initial field’s value, it will be observed that the power returned is lower than the supplied it [83,84][58][59].
The loss is proportional to the area surrounded by the upper and lower traces of the hysteresis curve; it represents the per cycle loss and it is proportional to f⋅B2al to 
[82]. However, if the curve’s shape remains equal for each successive excitation, the loss power will be the product of the core’s area and the applied frequency [80,82].
[57]. However, if the curve’s shape remains equal for each successive excitation, the loss power will be the product of the core’s area and the applied frequency [55][57]. The hysteresis loops give a lot of information about the magnetic properties [47]. An accurate way to calculate core loss is by measuring the full hysteresis curve [60].
The hysteresis loops give a lot of information about the magnetic properties [72]. An accurate wa are many to calculate core loss is by measuring the full hysteresis curve [85].
There are many meththods to calculate core losses; Figure 31 shows a general classification. All of them are based on one, two, or three main effects (hysteresis, Eddy current, and anomalous); depending on the method’s focus they are analyzed as macro or micro phenomena. Each one of the methods shown in Figure 31 will be detailed in the following paragraphs.
Figure 3.
Classification of core losses methods.
4. Magnetic Components Design Process
In general, the design process of a magnetic component consists of four steps: design, simulate, implement, and evaluate Figure 8.
Figure 8. Steps to design a magnetic component. Source: Adapted from [138].
Co-based amorphous wire is selected for its high impedance change rate, increasing the sensitive of the GMI sensor, it is used to fabricated a pick-up coil of 200 turns and diameter of 200 μ
The design step can completely follow the diagram shown in Figure 8, where the application specifications will determine the selection core material up to the copper losses, the core losses model, and the high-frequency effects according to [139,140][62][63].
It is worth to mention, that there are some intermediate steps, which are related to core physical and magnetic parameters such as the cross section of the core, section of the core, length of it, effective relative permeability, peak to peak density ripple, among others [141][64]. In the same way, choosing a gapped core (a core with a concentrated air gap) instead of a distributed air gap core will impact its behavior and parameters to calculate; for the first one, gap parameters as length are a priority. For the second one, permeability parameters will be taken into account [142][65].
As applications specifications as selection core material are fundamental to select or design a core losses model, both will establish the minimum parameters to calculate power losses.
The simulate step is the masterpiece to validate the magnetic component designed, but at the same time, it will be a problematic step if the designer is not careful; FEM software always will give a solution but does not mean that it is correct. In a general way, simulation steps can be subdivided into three parts: data analysis, finite element method, and simulation of applications.
From the design steps depending on the models selected to calculate power losses, core physical parameters, and data related to the windings, many formulas are involved, and sometimes some depend on others; software such as Mathcad® and Matlab® are of great help. in these cases. FEMFinite element method (FEM) is a big world, as it was explained in the section before. Once the magnetic component’s design is complete (windings and core parameters) and validated in FEM; the next step consists in exporting the final FEM design to software like Simulink® or Twin Builder®, PSIM®, to simulate it in a specific application and corroborate its correct performance [59,143,144,145,146][34][66][67][68][69].
The implementation step tests the simulated application through the interconnection of different sorts of software and platforms (MCU hardware, LabVIEW®, Typhoon HIL, among others) to simulate it with high fidelity, in similar conditions to real [147][70]. Typhoon in the loop HIL(HIL) systems is a feasible example of this, as it can see in Figure 8. The reader interested in magnetic component testing is referred to [148,149,150,151,152,153][71][72][73][74][75][76] and the references therein.
The last one is to evaluate, that is, physically build the magnetic component designed and tested in the steps before and implement it in a circuit. Technically speaking, the tests obtained in the implementation step must coincide with the physical circuit measurements with a minimal error percentage. If the magnetic component behavior is not satisfactory, the steps must be repeated, modifying the necessary parameters until the desired results are obtained.
5. Magnetic Devices and Miniaturization
Transportation, electrification, medical applications, micromachines, wireless communication and wireless charging are some areas demanding new technology to develop compact and high performance applications; and the manufacturing of low losses magnetic components is key [154][77].
Magnetic components exhibit design difficulties when power conversion systems require low power levels and high frequencies due to the nonlinear behavior of magnetic materials, thermal limits, and the exponential increase of losses under these conditions.
Core data and core losses models are critical to design magnetic components properly and select the size of magnetic devices. According to core selection material different procedures may be applied [155][78].
Miniaturization of magnetic components and micromachines are an interesting couple to develop and implement in biomedical devices and applications. In biomedical applications magnetism-based systems are widely utilized, for example, to studyknow and measure human tissue and organs (such as magnetocardiography, magnetoneurography, magnetoencephalography, and magnetomyography) [156,157,158,159][79][80][81][82]. By 2021, the market of magnetic sensors will worth around $7.6 billion due to their attractive commercial purposes and new application areas [160][83]. However, the development of efficient magnetic technologies that are sensitive, inexpensive, biocompatible and miniaturized is still far away [161][84].
The miniaturization, feasibility and integration of magnetic sensors for biomagnetic signal detection have been in constant evolution in terms of size, sensing signals magnitude (pico-Tesla scale), and environment conditions. In magnetic sensors, the magnetic field is converted into measurable quantities as voltage and current [156][79]. Some examples of them are the thin-film magnetoelectric (ME) sensors, optically pumped magnetometers (OPM), superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID), flux gate sensors, giant magnetoimpedance (GMI) sensor, magnetic sensors based on the thin-film magnetoresistive (MR), and conventional superconducting coils.
5.6 × 1.5 × 1.1 mm3 Co-based amorphous wire is selected for its high impedance change rate, increasing the sensitive of the GMI sensor, it is used to fabricated a pick-up coil of 200 turns and diameter of 200 μm.
m.
A common problem in biomagnetic sensors is the noise at low frequencies, specifically between 10 and 100 Hz due to the small magnitude of measured signals. A set of bi-planar electromagnetic coils is a recent technique to cancelling the Earth’s noise nearby the magnetic sensors and improving their sensitivity [156][79].
Magnetic signal detection including portable and handled devices in the point-of-care testing (POCT) including mini magnetic induction coils and electromagnets to do the devices more portable, flexible and with high detection capabilities. In [163][86] several examples of these applications are described, where magnetic devices have dimensions in centimeters scale and those consider other POCT techniques for their favorable accuracy, high reliability, innovation and novelty, although their cost might increase.
Portable and small size, or even single handled devices that provide rapid and accurate detection have potential application of POCT [163][86]. Portable and wearable biosensors are the future of healthcare sensor technologies. Those have demonstrated their utility in disease diagnosis with accurate prediction. Their incorporation with mobile phones is known as digital health or mobile health, which promises reduce the frequency of clinical visits, prevent health problems and revolutionary the demand of micro and wearable sensors technology [164,165,166][87][88][89].
The emerge of microrobots and the use of a magnetic resonance imaging help to improve diagnostic capabilities by minimally invasive procedures. A microrobot is a robot on a microscale that can perform high-precision operations. Microrobots’ actuation system require input energy to act it, which usually requires special materials (soft and hard magnetic materials) or structural design (arrangement of coils) [167,168][90][91]. While the propulsion of microrobots, ferromagnetic cores and magnetic structures can be used to generate an image of many sites in the human body [169,170,171][92][93][94].
In [172][95], microcoils with a diameter < 1 mm are used to harvest electromagnetic energy wirelessly by inductive coupling in the on-board energy robots, achieving several milliwatts of power, capable of controlled motion and actuation with a maximum efficiency of 40%. This has been a recent development to controlled and powered remotely a system-engineered miniaturized robot (SEMER).
To increase the adaptability and robustness of robotic systems in challenging environments, and inter disciplinary research is needed, including material science, biology, control, among others [172][95]. Magnetic materials and magnetoelectric concepts of micro and nanorobots in magnetic applications are detailed in [173][96].
In this authors opinion the versatility, scalability, and flexibility of developing a power core loss model to analyze and allowing a better comprehension of the magnetic phenomena in ferromagnetic materials, will be the first step to the miniaturization of magnetic devices and power conversion systems at any scale [174,175][97][98].
Abbreviations
| B | Magnetic flux density | ||
| Bn |
Magnetic flux density of the nth harmonic |
||
| f | Fundamental frequency |
