In today’s hyper-dynamic environment, the Industry 4.0 paradigm is reaching far beyond the basic concepts of automation by revolutionizing manufacturing enterprises especially in the areas of smart production and smart logistics. Moreover, Industry 4.0 is characterized by the vertical and horizontal integration of production and logistics systems as well as the merging between the physical and virtual worlds
[1]. Industry 4.0 approaches can, therefore, be divided into digitalization, digital interconnectivity, and self-controlling systems
[2]. Various technologies and technological concepts are discussed in production logistics, which can be classified as Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS), Internet of Things (IoT), interfaces, decentralized applications, real-time localization systems, automatic identification, virtual environments including Digital Twins (DTs), and applications of data science such as machine learning, data mining, and big data analytics
[3]. Companies are challenged with increasing dynamics, structural complexity, increased uncertainties and risks, and multiple feedback cycles. This leads to difficulties in the optimal design and control of production logistics systems
[4][5][4,5]. However, DT technology offers several approaches to overcome these problems
[6][7][6,7]. Originally, the concept of a Digital Twin was presented at the University of Michigan by Grieves in 2003. It was first introduced as a concept for product lifecycle management (PLM). At this stage, it was not explicitly called a Digital Twin, but the paper described the idea and important components of such a system
[8]. NASA has taken up this concept and described a Digital Twin in the technology roadmap for their flight system, to make comprehensive diagnostics and prognostics, enabling continuous safe operations over the life cycle of the system
[9]. Furthermore, Glaessgen and Stargel described a Digital Twin for the next generations of NASA and U.S. Air Force vehicles, giving more detail
[10]. Nevertheless, different fields of research adapt the original concept of a Digital Twin to their specific domain. Therefore, several publications discuss the application of DTs in production planning and control, maintenance, process design, layout design, product design, production process optimization, as well as prognostics and health management (PHM)
[11][12][13][11,12,13]. This may also be the reason why there is no common definition of a DT
[14]. One approach to finding a standardized and common definition of DTs has been elaborated by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). According to this proposal, the basic idea of a Digital Twin is to create a digital representation of an observable system or element
[15]. More specifically, other authors suppose it to mirror a product, process, or service in virtual space
[16]. Convergence between the physical and the virtual space is mandatory
[17] to create a closed-loop interaction between these components
[18]. A bidirectional communication enhances this convergence
[17], as real-time data integration plays a key role for Digital Twins
[19]. The concept of Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) can be described similarly. Tao et al. compared the differences and correlations of the two concepts. DTs are often discussed in the engineering area and are more focused on virtual models (VMs) that enable one-to-one communication between physical and virtual parts. CPS on the other hand is more frequently discussed in the scientific area. To enable fusion and one-to-many communication between the spaces, CPS emphasizes 3C capabilities (computation, communication, and control)
[20]. The DT technology can also be seen as a key enabler for realizing a Cyber-Physical Production System (CPPS)
[21][22][23][21,22,23]. Among many other application areas, there is great potential for use in production logistics processes
[3].