Expression levels of YB1 were significantly elevated in aggressive BC cancer cell lines when compared to their less aggressive counterparts ^[1]. More importantly, wresearchers showed that YB1 expression levels are significantly higher in TNBC cell lines when compared to all other BC subtypes ^[1], which indicated an association between YB1 expression and the aggressiveness of TNBC cell lines. WResearchers also showed that YB1 expression correlated with the metastatic potential of three TNBC metastasis progression models, namely the human MCA10A series ^[2], the murine 4T1 series ^[3], and the NME series ^[4][5]. To validate these findings in human patients’ specimens, we interrogated the datasets of two large, independent BC cohorts. The first cohort, the TCGA PanCancer BC cohort, which contains clinical information on 1082 BC patients, including 181 TNBCs, showed a significant (p < 0.0001) positive association between YB1 expression levels and the basal (TNBC) BC subtype (Figure 1A). Elevated expression levels of YB1 in the TNBC subtype also correlated (p = 0.03) with poor disease outcome and reduced survival probability in this cohort (Figure 1B). Next, researchers interrogated the BC KM-Plotter (https://kmplot.com/analysis, accessed on 6 January 2021) cohort, which contains clinical information on ~5000 BC patients, including 405 TNBCs, and this showed a very significant (p = 1.9 × 10⁸), positive correlation between YB1 mRNA expression and reduced survival probability (Figure 1C, upper panel). In this cohort, BC patients with high levels of YB1 in their tumors had worst clinical outcomes when compared to patients with low levels of YB1, and patients with high tumor YB1 have an average reduced survival of 31 months when compared to patients with low tumor YB1 (Figure 1C, lower panel). This correlation between YB1 expression levels and poor prognosis was also confirmed at the protein expression level (Figure 1D). Finally, researchers found YB1 mRNA expression levels in the TNBC cohort to also correlate with reduced survival (Figure 1E). Thus, the data support the function of YB1 as a promoter of BC aggressiveness in patients with TNBC tumors.

The literature provides overwhelming evidence that incidence of TNBC and TNBC-related death are disparately elevated in AA women when compared to their CA counterparts. The socioeconomic status and lack of access to health care by the AA population cannot alone explain these disparities, which suggests a difference in the biology of TNBC tumors between AA and CA might also contribute to the observed disparities. Researchers therefore set out to investigate whether the oncogenic activity of YB1 in TNBC tumors contributes to these disparities. First, wresearche rs assessed the expression levels of YB1 by RT-PCR in six established TNBC cell lines; three from AA and three from CA patients, and found YB1 to be significantly (p < 0.001) higher in AA cell lines MDA-MB-468, HCC70, and HCC180 when, compared to CA TNBC cell lines MDA-MB-231, BT549, and HCC38 (Figure 2A,B). WResearchers confirmed the results that were obtained in our cell lines in the human specimens from the TCGA PanCancer cohort, and found YB1 expression levels to be significantly (p < 0.0001) higher in AA patients (n = 182) when compared to CA patients (n = 749) (Figure 2C). Since mRNA levels may not always correlate with protein levels, researchers interrogated the relationship between YB1 mRNA and protein levels in the TCGA PanCancer cohort and found a significant positive correlation (p = 1.77 × e⁻¹⁵, Spearman) between mRNA and protein levels. Researchers also found YB1 protein expression levels to be significantly (p = 2.03 × e⁻³) higher in AA BC tumors when compared to Cas. Researchers further confirmed these findings in a separate TNBC cohort that wresearche rs acquired from the MetroHealth tumor biobank which contains clinical and survival information on 45 TNBC patients (25 AA and 20 CA). RT-PCR analyses showed that YB1 expression levels were significantly (p = 0.002) higher in AA TNBC tumors when compared to their CA counterparts (Figure 2D). Thus, researchers show that YB1 expression levels are associated with the AA race.

To better understand how the oncogenic activity of YB1 contributes to TNBC disparities, researchers sought to determine the effect of inhibition of YB1 expression on the behavior of TNBC cell lines of both AA and CA origins. Researchers applied the Synthego CRISPR-based knockout strategy that is based on a ribonucleoprotein (RNP) mix which contains both sgRNAs oligos and the translated Cas9 protein, and is used to deliver the sgRNAs to the nucleus of target cells via electroporation without the need for virus infection and drug selection. Researchers used a pool of three different sgRNAs to target YB1 in three AA and three CA TNBC cell lines. Western blot analyses showed a KO efficiency of more than 90% in all six cell lines (Figure 3A ). The KO efficiency was sustained after more than 15 passages in all six lines supporting the effectiveness the KO strategy. In some cases, after serial passaging of the KO cells, researcher observed progressive re-expression of YB1, and a simple second electroporation with the sgRNA RNP mix was sufficient to eliminate the residual YB1 expression.

The AKT pathway is widely documented to be affected by the loss of YB1 expression ^[6], which researchers confirmed in our YB1-KO cells where phosphorylation levels of AKT were decreased in all six cell lines as a result of the loss of expression of YB1 (Figure 3A). Next, researchers used the colony formation assay as an in vitro indicator assay for the oncogenicity of cancer cells, and found the loss of YB1 expression to significantly inhibit the colony formation potential of all six cell lines (Figure 3B,C). While colony formation was reduced in all six TNBC cell lines, the fold reduction in the AA cell lines ranged from 1.8 to 3 and averaged a 2.4-fold inhibition when compared to the CA cell lines, where the fold reduction ranged from 2.5 to 3.25 with and an average of 2.95-fold inhibition (Figure 3C). These data indicate that the CA TNBC cells are more sensitive to the loss of YB1 activity when compared to their AA counterparts, which show more addiction to YB1.

To further assess the effects of loss of YB1 expression on tumor growth and metastasis of TNBC cells in vivo, mammary fat pads of female Balb/C mice were inoculated with parental syngeneic 4T1 TNBC cells or their YB1-KO derivatives, and tumor growth was assessed over 5 weeks. Loss of YB1 significantly inhibited the growth of primary tumors (Figure 4A,B). While every mouse implanted with the parental 4T1 or the YB1-KO cells developed tumors (100% incidence), tumor latency was more than 1 week longer in the mice implanted with the YB1-KO 4T1 cells (Figure 4A). Tumor burden, as assessed by tumor volume (Figure 4B), was significantly lower (p  <  0.0001) in mice implanted with the YB1-deficient cells compared to their parental counterparts. Therefore, researchers show that loss of YB1 expression inhibits tumor growth, in vivo. Proliferation assays in 2D cultures showed no significant difference in cell growth between parental and YB1-KO. Therefore, the differences in tumor growth were rather the result of inhibition of YB1 oncogenic activity. Researchers also used Western Blot analyses of tumor lysates to confirm the sustained loss of YB1 expression in the tumors derived from the YB1-KO cells as these tumors grew in a slower rate as compared to the tumors derived from the parental cells.

Next, researchers sought to investigate whether inhibition of YB1 expression influences BC metastasis to the lungs. In the spontaneous metastasis assay, after the mice were sacrificed and the lungs were removed, and metastasis foci were counted. The number of lung metastasis foci was more than five-fold (p  <  0.001) lower in mice injected with the YB1-deficient 4T1 cells when compared to their parental counterparts (Figure 4C). These results show that YB1 plays a critical role in the growth, invasion, and metastasis of TNBC tumors, as demonstrated here in the tumor growth and the spontaneous metastasis assays.

Next, researchers assessed whether loss of YB1 would differentially affect tumor growth and metastasis in human AA vs CA TNBC cell lines. Researchers used one CA TNBC cell line (MDA-MB-231) and one AA TNBC cell line (MDA-MB-468) and the immuno-compromised mouse BC model NOD-scid-IL2Rgamma knockout (NSG) mice. While mice implanted by either the parental MDA-MB-231 or MDA-MB-468 developed tumors (Figure 4D), tumor burden was significantly higher in the mice implanted with the AA MDA-MB-468 TNBC cells (Figure 4D, black graph) when compared to the AA MDA-MB-231 cells (Figure 4D, grey graph), which suggests the more aggressive nature of TNBC tumors of AA origin. Additionally, the loss of YB1 expression inhibited the tumor growth of both MDA-MB-231-YB1-KO cells (Figure 4D, yellow graph) and MDA-MB-468-YB1-KO cells (Figure 4D, red graph). Tumor growth inhibition was, however, more pronounced in the CA MDA-MB-231 cells that are more sensitive to loss of YB1 when compared to AA MDA-MB-468 cells that are more resistant to loss of YB1 (Figure 4D, compare red graph to yellow graph). Thus, our data suggest a difference in sensitivity to loss of YB1 in tumor growth between AA and CA TNBC cells in vivo. These findings were also confirmed with respect to spontaneous lung metastasis (Figure 4E,F), where lung metastasis burden was ~2-fold higher with the AA MDA-MB-468 cells when compared to the CA MDA-MB-231 cells (Compare black bar of Figure 4E to grey bar of Figure 4F). Finally, while loss of YB1 significantly inhibited the metastasis of both AA MDA-MB-468 cells (Figure 4E, red bar) and CA MDA-MB-231 cells (Figure 4F, yellow bar), lung metastasis was reduced by ~3-fold in the AA MDA-MB-468 cells (Figure 4E) when compared to more than 8-fold in the sensitive CA MDA-MB-231 cells (Figure 4F). Together, these data, strongly suggest a critical role of YB1 in the aggressiveness of AA TNBC in vitro and in vivo.

It is showed that YB1 is required for the regulation of cancer stem cell phenotypes by modulating the expression levels of cancer stem cell (CSC) transcription machinery, including Oct4, Sox2, and Nanog. To determine whether these CSC transcription factors are differentially expressed between AA and CA TNBC tumors and cell lines, wresearche rs interrogated the TCGA PanCancer cohort and found Oct4 (Figure 5A), Nanog (Figure 5B), and Sox2 (Figure 5C) to be significantly (p < 0.001) highly expressed in tumors of the basal (TNBC) breast cancer subtype when compared to tumors of Her2, Luminal-A, or Luminal-B subtypes. Oct4 (Figure 5D), Nanog (Figure 5E), and Sox2 (Figure 5F) were also significantly disparately highly expressed in AA tumors when compared to their CA counterparts. Researcher have also shown that the WAVE3-YB1 signaling axis is required for the activation of the CSC phenotype in TNBC ^[7][8]. Here, WAVE3 is also significantly (p < 0.001) highly expressed in the tumors of the basal subtype (Figure 5G) and is significantly (p < 0.001) highly expressed in AA than in CA tumors (Figure 5H). Thus, researcher show that not only YB1 is highly expressed in AA versus CA TNBC tumors, but YB1-associated CSC genes are also disparately associated with TNBC tumors of AA origin, which may in part explain the aggressivity of these tumors in the AA population. Researcher confirmed these findings in our MetroHealth TNBC cohort, where YB1 (Figure 2E), Oct4 (Figure 5I), Nanog (Figure 5J), Sox2 (Figure 5K), and WAVE3 (Figure 5L) are significantly highly expressed in AA tumors when compared to their CA counterparts.

YB1 was shown to be associated with chemotherapy resistance in several types of cancer, including BC (reviewed in ^[9]). Researchers interrogated the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) for the IC50 of three of the most commonly used chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of patients with TNBC (Cisplatin, Docetaxel and Doxorubicin) in cell lines of the TNBC subtype; these included three AA and three CA TNBC cell lines. Researchers found the IC50 values, which are indicative of level of resistance to a given drug, to be consistently higher in AA cell lines when compared to their CA counterparts for cisplatin (Figure 6A,B), doxorubicin (Figure 6C,D) and docetaxel (Figure 6E,F). Since YB1 expression levels were also significantly elevated in AA cell lines when compared to their CA counterparts (Figure 2E), these results show a clear positive correlation between YB1 expression and resistance to chemotherapies. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of the TCGA breast cancer cohort confirmed our findings, where researchers found a significant (p = 0.003) enrichment of genes that are associated with docetaxel resistance in BC tumors that have increased levels of YB1 expression (Figure 6G) ^[10]. To investigate the role of YB1 in the chemoresistance in TNBC, researchers treated MDA-MB-468 with doxorubicin for 48 h. and found that this transient treatment resulted in the inhibition of YB1 expression and its phosphorylation levels (Figure 6H). However, in MDA-MB-468 that were generated to be permanently resistant to doxorubicin (Dox-Res), researchers found this chronic exposure to doxorubicin to instead activate both the expression and phosphorylated levels of YB1 (Figure 6H). These finding were confirmed in MDA-MB-468 that were generated to be resistant to cisplatin (Cis-Res) and found both the expression and phosphorylation of YB1 to be increased in the Cis-Res cells when compared to their control counterparts (Figure 6I). Thus, researchers show that chronic exposure to chemotherapy induces YB1 expression and phosphorylation. Next, researchers injected either the parental or the cisplatin-resistant (Cis-Res) MDA-MB-468 cells into the mammary fat pads of female NSG mice. At 21 days post implantation, mice from both the groups received two doses of cisplatin (1 mg/kg, IP) per week for 3 weeks, and tumor growth was followed for several weeks (Figure 6J). Researchers found that treatment with cisplatin resulted in inhibition of tumor growth in both groups for the first three weeks following the treatment; after this three-week period, the mice that were injected with the Cis-res cells showed a tumor growth that was much faster than the mice injected with the parental control cells. After 70 days of follow-up, the average volume of the tumors derived from the parental cells did not exceed 150 mm³, while that of the tumors derived from the cisplatin-resistant cells rapidly reached the maximal tumor burden of more than 1000 mm³ (Figure 6J). Therefore, researchers speculate that the increased YB1 expression in the Cis-resistant cells, which is induced by chronic exposure to chemotherapy, confers these cells with an enhanced tumor growth potential and makes them refractory to chemotherapy treatment. Together, our data suggest a novel positive feedback loop between YB1 expression and chemoresistance, therefore creating a vicious oncogenic environment which activates a sustained tumor growth and metastasis, which is more active in AA TNBC tumors, and ultimately contributes to the disparities in health outcomes in AA women with TNBC disease.