The energy invested to produce drinking water for use in a flush toilet for wet sanitation is not a sustainable activity; there is a requirement for alternative sanitation options to be trialled and eventually put in place^[1]. Although the use of grey sawater (water waste from all household activities except sewage)^[2] and raitation systems (nwater is one option currently being used to save precious drinkable water, this option is still linked to a central wet sanitation system. Therefore, an option independent from the central wet infrastructure, such as the waterless or composting toilets), which represents dry sanitation systems, remains a key option.

Dry sanitation systems have been used in the developed world since the 19Rikard Lidstrom invented the first composting toilet in 1939 in Tyreso, Sweden. A patent was created in 1962, and the company Clivus Multrum started selling models in the 1970s.

Currently, Ttheir use has rere are manufacturers of dry sanitation systems in several countries around the world including Japan, the United States, Germany, Sweden and France^[3][4][5][6]. Moreover, organivzations promote both the manufactured acceptance in rural re and use of waterless and composting toilets in developing countries (e.g., Semarnat & Tierramor in Mexico), and there are also manuals for their construction^[7]. The main microorganions of Europe and sms reported to be involved in the composting process are bacteria, actinobacteria and fungi^[8].

Dry sanitation systems he United Staave been mainly used in rural areas and those areas with water shortages^[9][10][11], but thesir use in urban areas has also been studied^[9]. A Some of thecommercially available dry sanitation system (bio-toilet) has also been used in Japan in public parks, sightseeing locations and households^[12].

The main advantages of the dry sanitation systems include their waterless nature, their low energy requiremare the decentralization of a water system and the production of fertilizer for plants. This activity falls within the sustainability approaches required nowadays since the increasing world population (7.7 billion in 2020) is constantly adding more pressure to the already limited drinking water resources. More importantly, it could lower the number of gastrointestinal infections recorded in rural areas. Increased sanitation can be cost-beneficial; it has been observed that the return of $1 invested in sanitation was in the range of $11.6–22.9^[13]. However, int and the creation formation on dry sanitation systems is still scarce and there is a lack of peer-reviewed literature. Therefore, this review is based on the available peer-reviewed and grey literature^[14][15] and aims to compile inf fertilizer as an added value produormation on the different types of commercially available dry sanitation systems with an emphasis on the large-capacity waterless toilets that require the least maintenance. Such models could provide an alternative for the growing ecotourism industry, ski and hiking areas, refugee shelters or rural/impoverished areas in developing countries suffering water shortages.

Self-cont. Moreover, the use of such a system iained refers to those where the composting chamber and the toilet are one unit. Central composting toilets have a much larger tank and can be connected to multiple toilets. Vertical piping is needed to direct the faecal matter to the composting tank.

In general, a dry sanitation system and their optimum parameters in works by converting the waste into compost that can later be used as fertilizer for crops. Compost is a mixture of decomposing manure or vegetable waste, where the decomposition is carried out aerobically by specific microorganisms that include aeratiobacteria, fungi and actinomycetes^[21][22]. Four stages of the compost can be defined: (1) the mesophilic phase, moistur (2) the thermophilic phase, (3) the cooling phase and 4) the curing phase^[23]. In the initial decontemposing stage, mesophilic bacteria such as Escherichia coli and ot (50%–60%)her Enterobacteria produce CO₂ and energy that is partially used for reproduction and growth and the rest is released as heat, raising tempehe compost temperature (40–65 °C), carbon to nitrogen ratio (25–35), pH (5to 44 °C. This is followed by the thermophilic microorganisms that further raise the temperature to 65 °C, and in this process the pathogens are killed. At the cooling phase, the mesophilic microorganisms take over again and continue digesting the more resistant organic materials. Humus is produced by fungi and other microorganisms such as earthworms and sowbugs. The last step in the composting process called curing, aging or maturing is long and should last around 12 months after the thermophilic phase to make sure pathogens have been destroyed^[23].5–8.0) This was confirmed by a study that found the risks of and porosity (35%–50%)handling the compost after 12 months are low. This study is described in more detail below ^[24].

Some Tof the temperature–time critemost common commercially available dry sanitation systems for houses and public facilities include self-contained or central, urine-diverting, electrical, and single or multi-chambered. Although these toilets are more expensive than flush toilets, the cost in the long term will be lower than the flushing ones^[13] since water bion approach is the most common method used to ells will be significantly lowered. However, to date, there is no standard guideline for composting toilets, which creates a lack of consistency in the presentation of toilet capacity. Some factors to take into consideration when choosing the right dry sanitation system are the capacity, which is the number of uses/day, the availability of electricity, the population density, position of the composter (ground level or above) and climatic conditions, among others. It is also important to note that most of the models require frequent maintenance for their proper functioning. Adding bulking agents, spraying liquids and mixing the compost pile are critical to maintaining a good rate of decomposition.

Alternative options (not commercialuate the stability and saflly available) include toilets using nanotechnology and solar power. In addition, the separation of urine to be used later as fertilizer has been advocated as a sustainable solution. Urine is nitrogen rich (75%–90% contributed by urea), and its phosphate and potassium compounds are readily water soluble and available for plants^[25]; urine also has a low concentraty ofion of heavy metals compared to synthetic fertilizers^[26]. Thus, its collecthe coion in diverting toilets represents a good alternative to conventional sanitation systems and it has been implemented in several developed and developing countries^[27].

Some post as arojects funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation^[26] include designs/prototypes fsuch as a solar-powertilizer. The risks of handlined toilet that generates hydrogen and electricity by CalTech, a toilet that produces biological charcoal, minerals and clean water, designed by Loughborough University, and a toilet that sanitizes faeces and urine while recovering resources and clean water, designed by the University of Toronto^[28]. A toilet user interface designed by the wasEawag has also been recognized.

A nanomembrane toile after t was designed by researchers from Cranfield University and was also funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in September 2012^[29]. This toilet is intended for urban poor areas because it requires months of comaintenance only every six months. It uses thin nanofibres arranged in bundles inside the chamber that help move the water vapour through beads that condense the vapour into water. The solid waste is left to dry in a holding chamber until a technician removes it^[29].

Thus, the future of dry sanitation systems appears prosting have been calculated as lowmising. This review categorizes these systems and provides the latest commercially available models, with an emphasis on those with large capacities which require the least maintenance. We also aimed to describe the principal factors required to maintain an efficient composting process and, in general, to increase awareness of dry sanitation systems as a sustainable alternative for waste management, especially for remote and rural areas, as well as refugee shelters where water may be limited.