Spermatozoa are physiologically exposed to reactive oxygen species (ROS) that play a pivotal role on several sperm functions through activation of different intracellular mechanisms involved in physiological functions such as sperm capacitation associated-events. However, ROS overproduction depletes sperm antioxidant system, which leads to a condition of oxidative stress (OS). Subfertile and infertile men are known to present higher amount of ROS in the reproductive tract which causes sperm DNA damage and results in lower fertility and pregnancy rates. Thus, there is a growing number of couples seeking fertility treatment and assisted reproductive technologies (ART) due to OS-related problems in the male partner. Interestingly, although ART can be successfully used, it is also related with an increase in ROS production. This has led to a debate if antioxidants should be proposed as part of a fertility treatment in an attempt to decrease non-physiological elevated levels of ROS. However, the rationale behind oral antioxidants intake and positive effects on male reproduction outcome is only supported by few studies.
1. Introduction
The mammalian spermatozoon is a cell with a high demand for energy to perform its function. Spermatozoa obtain their energy by two main metabolic pathways: glycolysis that occurs in the principal piece of the flagellum and oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) that takes place on mitochondria located at the midpiece of the flagellum
[1]. Spermatozoa contain between 50 and 75 mitochondria
[2] and as with any other kind of cell that performs aerobic metabolism, is associated with the production of free radicals named reactive oxygen species (ROS) that include the hydroxyl radicals (•OH), superoxide anion (•O
2−), hydrogen peroxide (H
2O
2), and nitric oxide (NO). These ROS are highly reactive molecules due to the presence of an unpaired electron in their outer shell. In addition, they have a very short half-life in the range of nanoseconds to milliseconds. ROS are produced as a consequence of natural cell machinery and participate in the normal function of a cell. However, when ROS production overcomes cellular antioxidant defenses surpassing a physiological range, they cause deleterious effects due to oxidative stress (OS) that results in oxidation of lipids, proteins, carbohydrates, and nucleotides
[3].
Male subfertility and infertility have been associated with OS. Moreover, since infertile men have lower seminal plasma antioxidant capacity in comparison with fertile men, when higher levels of ROS occur, they led to an increase of lipid peroxidation (LPO)
[4]. It is well described that when ROS overproduction occurs, it induces sperm DNA damage, although they have the potential to fertilize embryo development and fertility might be disturbed
[5][6][5,6]. It is unclear how this is related with the fact that nowadays infertility is becoming a worldwide health problem, where one out of six couples are under fertility treatment and thus the use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) to overcome this problem is growing exponentially. Nevertheless, ART is not harmless and is also associated with an increase of ROS production
[7]. Although there is literature focused on the effects of consumption of oral substances with antioxidant properties on sperm parameters, the purpose of this review is to discuss the efficiency of antioxidant intake as a dietary supplement as well as an additive through ART procedures to counteract excessive ROS production that leads to infertility. We will also focus on the molecular mechanisms of action of those compounds with antioxidant activity in the male reproductive system, mainly reviewing literature that relates antioxidant treatment with ART, clinical pregnancy, and live birth as final outcomes.
2. Mechanism of ROS Defense in Spermatozoa
Spermatozoa differentiation is achieved during spermiogenesis as they gradually lose their cytoplasm. By the end of the process, the cytoplasm content is very small compared to other cells, where most of the space is occupied by DNA (sperm head). This special feature results in spermatozoa possessing low intracellular antioxidant activity consisting of superoxide dismutase (SOD), nuclear glutathione peroxidase (GPx), peroxiredoxin (PRDX), thioredoxin (TRX), and thioredoxin reductase (TRD)
[8][30]. Therefore, sperm ROS scavenger activity basically depends on the antioxidant content of the seminal plasma, which is formed mainly by a trio of enzymes where SOD converts superoxide anion (O
2−.) to hydrogen peroxide (H
2O
2), preventing the formation of hydroxyl radical that is an inductor of LPO. However, the H
2O
2 generated is a strong membrane oxidant that is rapidly eliminated either by catalase (CAT) or GPx activities, giving H
2O as a product. Finally, seminal plasma also contains nonenzymatic antioxidant components such as α-tocopherol (vitamin E), ascorbic acid (vitamin C), pyruvate, urate, taurine, and hypotaurine
[9][31].
It should be noted that most ART involves washing steps, meaning that all the natural antioxidant defenses contained in seminal plasma are removed. Likewise, this also happens after natural insemination. During ejaculation, spermatozoa are surrounded by antioxidant molecules coming from seminal plasma but once the ejaculate reaches the vagina, seminal plasma is diluted, leading in both cases to spermatozoa facing ROS. Although spermatozoa possess antioxidant scavenger systems, it seems that they are not strong enough when ROS levels exceed physiological levels, subsequently making spermatozoa highly susceptible to OS.
3. Effects of Oral Antioxidant Intake on Male Reproductive Outcome
Currently, there is a growing trend of oral antioxidant intake to counteract high levels of ROS found in spermatozoa and seminal plasma of subfertile or infertile men. This hypothesis is supported by several works that describe an improvement of sperm parameters after oral antioxidant intake. Among those improvements, sperm concentration, motility, or decrease of DNA damaged are reported (Reviewed by
[10][38]). However, only a few works have shown the effect of antioxidant therapy on fertility outcomes. Here, we discuss the major findings of oral antioxidant intake in reproduction outcome and its endpoints, such as fertility and live birth (summarized in
Table 1).
Table 1. Effects of oral antioxidant intake on infertile men’s reproductive outcome.
Antioxidant Type and Daily Dose |
Period Intervention (months) |
ART |
Relevant Findings |
Participants |
Problem |
Reference |
Astaxantin (16 mg) |
3 |
NI and IUI |
↑ Pregnancy rate 54.5% (5/11) vs. 10.5% (2/19) placebo group |
30 |
Infertile |
[11] | [39] |
LC (1 g twice) LAC (0.5 g twice) |
3 |
|
↓ ROS levels ↑ Pregnancy (11.7%) in patients with abacterial-PVE with normal values of leucocytes It didn´t improve pregnancy (0%) in abacterial-PVE patients with high levels of leucocytes |
54 |
PVE |
[12] | [40] |
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory + carnitine (Carnitene, 2 g + Nicetile 1 g) Carnitine (Carnitene, 2 g + Nicetile 1 g) Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory + carnitine (Carnitene, 2 g + Nicetile 1 g) |
2 + 2 4 4 4 |
|
23.1% pregnancy 0% pregnancy 6.2% pregnancy 3.8% pregnancy |
98 |
PVE with ↑ levels of leucocytes |
[13] | [41] |
LC (3 g), LAC (3 g), LC (2 g) + LAC (1 g) |
6 |
NI |
↑ Total oxyradicals scavenging capacity of seminal fluid ↑ Sperm motility and concentration. Pregnancy rate was not modified |
60 |
Asthenozoospermic |
[14] | [42] |
LC (1 mg), fumarate (725 mg), LAC (500 mg), Fructose (1000 mg), CoQ10 (20 mg), Vitamin C (90 mg), Zinc (10 mg), Folic acid (200 μg), Vitamin B12 (1.5 μg) |
6 |
NI |
↑ Achieved pregnancy in treated men 22.2% (10/45) vs. 4.1% (2/49) non treated group |
104 |
Oligo-and/or astheno-and/or teratozoospermia |
[15] | [43] |
LC fumarate (2 g), LAC (1 g) Clomiphene citrate (50 mg) and a complex of vitamins and microelements |
3–4 |
NI |
↑ Sperm concentration No modification in pregnancy rates |
173 |
Oligo- and/or asteno- and/or teratozoospermia |
[16] | [44] |
LC fumarate (1 g), Acetyl-L- carnitine HCl (0.5 g) Fructose (1 g), Citric acid (50 mg), Vitamin C (90 mg), Zinc (10 mg), Folic acid (200 µg), Selenium (50 µg), Coenzyme Q-10 (20 mg) Vitamin B12 (1.5 µg) |
6 |
NI |
↑ Sperm concentration,% of sperm motile or progressive motility as well as sperm with normal morphology Treated men achieved 29% pregnancy versus 17.9% in the placebo group |
90 |
After performed a varicocelectomy |
[17] | [45] |
Vitamin E (600 mg) |
3 |
IVF |
Improvement of zona pellucida binding test No effect on ROS levels No alteration on seminal plasma vitamin E levels |
30 |
Infertile |
[18] | [46] |
Vitamin E (300 mg) |
3 |
NI |
21% of men had improved sperm motility and achieved pregnancy where 81.8% of pregnancies finished with a live birth |
52 |
Asthenospermic |
[19] | [47] |
Vitamin E (200 mg) |
1 |
IVF |
↓ Sperm LPO ↑ Fertility rate: 19.3 ± 23.3 pre-treatment versus 29.1 ± 22.2 post-treatment |
15 |
Normospermic infertile |
[20] | [48] |
Vitamin E (1 g) Vitmin D (1 g) |
2 |
ICSI |
76.3% respond to the treatment with ↓DNA damage ↑ Pregnancy rate (6.9 vs. 49.3%) ↑ Implantation rate (2.2 vs. 19.2%) Equal embryo quality |
38 |
Infertile men non responding to ICSI |
[21] | [49] |
Vitamin E (400 IU) Selenium (200 µg) |
3.5 |
NI |
10.8% pregnancy |
690 |
Infertile |
[22] | [50] |
Vitamin E (400 IU), Vitamin C (100 mg), Lycopene (6 mg), Zinc (25 mg), Selenium (26 μg), Folate (0.5 mg), Garlic (1000 mg) |
3 |
IVF-ICSI |
Doubled pregnancy rate (63.9 vs. 37.5%), Doubled implantation rate (46.2 vs. 24%) Doubled viable pregnancy rate (38.5 vs. 16%) |
60 |
Infertile men with ↑ levels of DNA fragmentation and poor motility and membrane integrity |
[23] | [51] |
Zinc sulphate (220 mg) |
4 |
NI |
21.4% (3/14) of patients achieved pregnancy Zinc levels were increased in seminal plasma |
14 |
Human |
[24] | [52] |
Zinc sulphate (500 mg) |
3 |
NI |
Improved pregnancy (22.5%) vs. placebo (4.3%) Zinc levels were not modified on seminal plasma |
100 |
Asthenozoospermic |
[25] | [53] |