The Mitochondrial Calcium Channel Discovery

Note: The following contents are extract from your paper. The entry will be online only after author check and submit it.

1. Introduction

Every cell type, in every tissue and at any evolutionary level, can communicate with the surrounding environment and with neighboring cells. Both intercellular and extracellular communication play fundamental roles in shaping cell behavior and driving cell fate decisions. Cell-to-cell and environmental signals are normally conveyed by distinct extracellular mediators (hydrophilic or hydrophobic compounds, mechanical, ionic, cell–cell interactions, etc.) that are normally perceived by cells through surface receptors. These receptors convey them into a limited number of intracellular molecules, which are referred to as ‘second messengers’, which, in turn, forward the message to intracellular effectors finally activating the ultimate cellular responses. Despite the plethora of different signals and stimuli that cells may receive, only a few molecules to date have been described as second messengers of intracellular communication. Among them, the most common and, definitively, the most extensively studied is Ca²⁺.

Ca²⁺ ions participateare involved in the decoding of a vast range of stimuli and the variety of cellular components involved in the Ca²⁺ signal transduction is extremely wide, including basically all kinds of components, organelles,[1–3] and molecules ^[1][2][3]. The research studies on Ca²⁺ second messenger started more than one hundred years ago, with the initial recognition of the role of Ca²⁺ in muscle cell contraction ^[4]. Since then, the understanding of Ca²⁺ signaling regulation and dynamics has progressively increased leading to the definition of the concept of Ca²⁺ compartmentalization and to the demonstration of the existence of microdomains of local high Ca²⁺ concentration ^[5], which are crucial for the fine-tuning and correct triggering of the Ca²⁺-dependent cellular effects ^[1].

Mitochondriamitochondria play a fundamental and multifaceted role in the orchestration of cellular Ca²⁺ signals. Indeed, mitochondria are not a store of rapidly releasableefficiently uptake Ca²⁺ (such as the ER), but rather they efficiently accumulate Ca²⁺ upon Ca²⁺ entry from the extracellular space or upon release from ER or extracellular Ca²⁺ stores ^[6]. Uponentry [4] thus buffering the cytosolic Ca²⁺ elevationraise and tuning global Ca²⁺ signaling. Moreover, the entryincrease of Ca²⁺ into mitochondria exerts a central function in the modulation of cell metabolism. Mitochondria host the enzymes and complexes of the TCA cycle, fatty acid oxidation (FAO), and oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) thus representing the site of the major metabolic pathways and enzymes for cell energy supply, which deserved them the name of ‘cellular powerhouses’. Interestingly, Ca²⁺ entry and oxidative activity are two strictly intertwined aspects of mitochondrial physiology. The increase of the mitochondrial matrix Ca²⁺ level stimulates both Ca²⁺-sensitive mitochondrial dehydrogenases [7]^[8][9][5–7] and respiratory chain complexes [10]^[11] resident in the organelles, fueling the TCA cycle activity as well as aerobic respiration and[8,9] thus boosting the overallcellular oxidative metabolism. This makes mitochondria the central hubs for the rapid and effective adaptation of cell metabolism to the changes in energy requirements that are typically decoded as variations of intracellular Ca²⁺ concentration.

In addition, mitochondria also actively participate in the tuning of global Ca²⁺ signals thanks to their ability to take up Ca²⁺ during intracellular Ca²⁺ elevation with

We provide here a net result of buffering the cytosolic cation concentration thus modulating the overall cellular Ca²⁺ response. This buffering capacity is due to two crucial characteristics of the mitochondria: (i) their strategic position in close contacts to the Ca²⁺ release channels of the ER store ^[6] and the plasma membrane in immune cells ^[12] (ii) the presence on their inner membrane of highly selective and efficient machinery for taking up Ca²⁺, the MCU complex.

Finally, the large buffering capacity of mitochondria can protect cells from Ca²⁺ overload. Indeed, an excessive accumulation of the cation in the mitochondrial matrix triggers the permeability transition pore (PTP) opening, the release of pro-apoptotic factors, and finally, induction of programmed cell death ^[13]. Given the strong association between mitochondrial Ca²⁺ overload and apoptosis induction, the maintenance of mitochondrial Ca²⁺ homeostasis is thus a crucial aspect for ensuring cell survival ^[14][15].

Given the extreme relevance of mitochondria Ca²⁺ signaling for cell physiology, the unveiling of the molecular factors mediating mitochondrial Ca²⁺ entry and the mechanism(s) of their regulation has been one of the scientific challenges of recent years. In this review, we aim to summarize somebrief overview of the milestone achievements in the history of mitochondrial Ca²⁺ research, with a particular focus on the recent findings ofon the mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uniporter complex and its role in organ physiologyregulators. We will briefly describe the early studies leading to the demonstration of the Ca²⁺ accumulation capacity of mitochondria, then we will go through the historical chronicle of the discoveries of the mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uniporter genes and multiple regulators (Figure 1) and we will conclude with an excursus on the physiological relevance of mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake in the context of skeletal muscle tissue.

Figure 1. Timeline of the identification of MCU complex components. The most relevant findings on the structure and composition of the MCU complex discovery are summarized and chronologically presented along a timeline covering the last 10 years. Schematic cartoons show the different components of the MCU complex according to the date of their discovery along the timeline.

2. Timeline of Mitochondrial Ca²⁺ signaling in the pre-MCU Identificationera

It is suggestive to recall that

The first report about the notionrelevance of Ca²⁺ ions being relevant to organ physiology dates back to more than one century ago whenthe work of Ringer in 1883 [10], who described the first report on the physiological actioncapacity of Ca²⁺ ions appeared in 1883 ^[4]. At that time, Ringer described the effects of Ca²⁺ additionto induce organ contraction when added to isolated frog hearts and demonstrated that the supplementation of Ca²⁺ in the perfusion solution actively induces and sustains the contraction of the organ ex vivo ^[4]. This seminal observation revealed that Ca²⁺ is a fundamental messenger within cells, a concept that then extended to virtually every cell type and physiological and pathological process, giving rise to a broad field of study commonly referred to as the field of intracellular Ca²⁺ signaling. The intrinsic ability of contracting myocytes to operate ex vivo and to rapidly and effectively respond to environmental condition changes made them the ideal experimental system for the investigation of the role of Ca²⁺ in organ and cell physiology and was extensively exploited by researchers in the following years.

The original concept of the existence of intracellular compartments acting as Ca²⁺ stores to accumulate the cation required to sustain muscle contraction has been later postulated and demonstrated in 1947 by Heilbrunn ^[16]. However, although surprising, the identification of the sarco/endoplasmic reticulum (SR/ER) as the principal cellular Ca²⁺ store came only 20 years later. It was in the 1960′s, with the identification of Ca²⁺ pumping machinery on intracellular membranes (in particular the calcium pump of the sarcoplasmic reticulum, better known as SERCA) by three independent scientists ^{[17][18][19][20]} and the advent of new methodologies for the measurement of intracellular Ca²⁺ concentration ^[21] that the ER and its specialized counterpart in muscle cells (the SR) were recognized the main cellular reservoir of Ca²⁺.

BeforeAfter that, the pioneering work ofcardiac physiologists Slater &and Cleland on cardiac myocyte preparations from rat hearts firstly describedidentified some subcellular compartments, able to accumulate Ca²⁺ that they called "sarcosomes" at that time, as the entities actively accumulating Ca^2+[22][11]. Interestingly, these “sarcosomes” did not consist of ER but, instead, they corresponded towere indeed isolated mitochondria, to which the addition of Ca²⁺ caused the block of their oxidative phosphorylation activity. Thus, Ca²⁺ ions behaved as mitochondria uncouplersuncoupler. Despite that, Ca²⁺ appeared to exert a peculiar inhibitory action on mitochondrial OXPHOS activity, which differed from the other irreversible uncouplers known at that period (dinitrophenol, dicoumarol, rotenone, antimycin A, azide, or cyanide), due to the reversibility of its action ^[23]. This assigned to Ca²⁺ ions a functional role in mitochondria activity.

After that, a series of land-marking works

It was in the early 60′s experimentally revealed that energized mitochondria can actively take up Ca^{2+[24][25][26]}. Interestingly, these results anticipatedeven before the clear demonstrationpostulation of a driving force for Ca²⁺ accumulation in mitochondria, i.e., the chemiosmotic theory, postulated and validated by Peter Mitchell [27]. This theory is based on[12] that the following concepts: (i) the activityconcept of the respiratory chain complexes is linked to the extrusion of protons from the matrix to the intermembrane space (IMS) across the inner membrane of mitochondria (IMM). (ii) The accumulation of protons in the IMS generates a difference in the charges across the IMM of around −150 ÷ −180 mV (negative inside) establishing the so-called mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨ_m). (iii) This steep ΔΨ_m represents the main driving force for the proton gradient-sustained synthesis of ATP and Ca²⁺ cation entry intobeing actively taken up by energized mitochondria was experimentally validated [13–15].

Soon after that, the matrix.

Shortly after, at the Universitygroup of Bristol, Denton and his group made important discoveries on the Ca²⁺-dependent modulation ofdiscovered that three critical oxidative enzymes resident in mitochondria [7]^[8][9]: (pyruvate dehydrogenase phosphatase (the enzyme that dephosphorylates and relieves pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) activity allowing the conversion of NAD⁺, coenzyme A (CoA) and pyruvate into NADH, CO₂, and acetyl-CoA, providing substrates to the citric acid (TCA) cycle and cellular respiration), NAD-isocitrate dehydrogenase and oxoglutarate dehydrogenase. The fact that these mitochondrial rate-limiting enzymes) are under the control ofsubjected to a Ca²⁺ definitively sets the cation at the center of the cell oxidative metabolism-dependent modulation [5–7]. Moreover, the evidence that mitochondria can take up Ca²⁺ in response to elevation of cytosolic Ca²⁺ levels, as shown in insulin-treated epididymal adipose tissue ^[28], established an active role of mitochondrial Ca²⁺ entry in shaping cell oxidative metabolism to match the increased cellular energy demands thus tailoring the metabolic outcomes according to the different environmental cues.

Despite all these conceptual advancements, two major issues were destinedcontinued to puzzle the scientific community for decades. On one end, there isa long time: i) the apparent paradox between the physiological concentration of cytosoliclow Ca²⁺, which was estimated levels (in the submicromolar range ^[29][30][31]) present in the cytosol, [16–18], and the lowreduced Ca²⁺ affinity of the mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake, whose half-maximal rate machinery (Km) was measured in the order of several µM (reviewed in ^[32][19]). On the other end,; ii) the fundamental question about the molecular identity of the IMM apparatus responsible for the entry ofmitochondrial Ca²⁺ channel mediating Ca²⁺ entry into mitochondria was still without an answer.

It took around 30 and 50 years, respectively,several decades to find solutionsanswer to those two enigmas. The answer to the former came with the advent of innovative and sophisticated technologies allowing the assessment of Ca²⁺ distribution at the sub-cellular and sub-organellar levels, including mitochondria. Indeed, thanks to the development of new genetic Ca²⁺-sensitive genetic probes and recombinant fluorescent proteins specifically targeted to specific intracellular microdomains ^[33][34]domains [20,21], it was possible to measure variations of Ca²⁺ concentration in defined and limited areas of the cell (such as. This led to the cytosolic facevisualization of plasmalemma ^[35] or the surface of outer mitochondrial membrane ^[36], or the Golgi cisternae ^[37]) as well as the relative positioning of the intracellular organelles. These studies were pivotal in the field of cell biology for two main reasons: i) they allowed the observation of the intrinsic heterogeneity of cellular Ca²⁺ distribution, definitively demonstrating that large variations in Ca²⁺ concentration are highly regionalized within the cell cytoplasmorganelle dynamics and allowing the direct measure of Ca²⁺ levels in theinterorganelle contacts (as those between mitochondria matrix as well as in theand ER lumen; ii) they pinpointed the fact that organelles, including ER and mitochondria, are in close contact with each other through macromolecular structures involving proteins from both the compartments. In the case of ER-mitochondrial contacts, these structures are biochemically isolated as mitochondria-associated membranes (MAMs) and are formed by membrane channels, asto the IP₃R and VDAC, respectively, and adaptor proteinsidentification of both organelles, such as Grp75, mitofusins, PACS ^[38]. Upon cell stimulation, the massive release of Ca²⁺ through the ER membrane clusters of IP₃Rs generates microdomains of high Ca²⁺ concentration right at the mouth of the channel pores, exactly where mitochondria are located. This allows mitochondria to perceive a local cation concentration sufficient to meet the low affinity of the mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake machinery [36]^[39]. Thus, their strategic position in proximity of ER Ca²⁺ release channels and their ability to take up Ca²⁺ with high conductance make mitochondria the ideal operator for cushioning the sudden Ca²⁺ rise in the cytosol of stimulated cells, thus behaving as an instrumental Ca²⁺ buffer ^[6][21,22]. The fact that Ca²⁺ entry into mitochondria stimulates the TCA cycle, respiration, and ATP production then places mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake as a key element for the prompt modulation of cell metabolism to rapidly and efficiently adapt to a variety of environmental cues and energy demands.

Another fundamental advancement in mitochondrial signaling occurred when scientists found the answer to the second bigfundamental question, i.e., of the mitochondrial signaling field came with the discovery of the molecular identity of the mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uniporter (MCU) machinery. The chronicle of MCU discoveries actually started in 2010, with the identification of the first gene required for the uptake of Ca²⁺ by mitochondria, CBARA1, coding for the mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake 1 protein (MICU1) ^[40], then followed by the identification of the mitochondrial channel and the elucidation of its interactors, as described belowmultiple regulators. The search of the other mitochondrial Ca²⁺ channel components has been proceeding expansively in the last decade (see next paragraph for a detailed timeline) and it is presently still actively ongoing. The discoveries of many different groups worldwide have been indeed instrumental to provide cell biologists with new knowledge on the functional role of mitochondrial Ca²⁺ and with new tools for the genetic and molecular intervention on global Ca²⁺ signaling and cell energetics.

3. Discovery and CharacterizationIdentification of the MCU Complex Components

3.1. MCU

The chroniclediscovery of MCU discovery starts withis due to two pioneering studies published in 2011 [41]^[42][23,24] (Figure 1Figure 1) that finally identified and cloned the long-sought MCU pore-forming unitprotein and cloned its coding gene, CCDC109A CCDC109A. MCU is a highly conserved 40 kDa proteinpolypeptide ubiquitously expressed in plants, metazoans, protozoans, and fungi but not presentabsent in yeast [43]. This pore-forming unit[25], it oligomerizes to form the active Ca²⁺ channel within the inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM) and it directly interacts with the channelmitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake regulator 1 protein MICU1 [26].

Recently, whichthe structure of the human MCU together with its auxiliary component EMRE was identifiedobtained [27]. Each human MCU arranges in tetramers and each subunit complexes with one year earlier ^[40]EMRE peptide. These reports clearly demonstrated that the transient downregulationThe silencing of MCU inhibitsblunted the mitochondrial accumulation of Ca²⁺ that follows the IP₃-generating agonist in stimulated cells. Of note, the blunted mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake response occurs without changes in the mitochondria morphology or membrane potential of the MCU-silencedHeLa cells [41][23]. On the contrary, MCU overexpression enhances agonist-induced mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake in mammalian cells. In addition, in vitro experiments, in which recombinant MCU proteins were inserted in a planar lipid bilayer, showed that this pore-subunit alone is sufficient to form the channel. Indeed, in this setting, the MCU electrophysiological activity is completely abolished by the additionprecise description of the known inhibitor Ruthenium Red, firmly pointing atmolecular interactions between MCU as the genuine core component of the mitochondrial Ca²⁺ machinery.

Sequence and topology analyses revealed that both the Nits regulators EMRE- and CMICU1-termini of MCU are locatedMICU2 in the mitochondrial matrix and that MCU is endowed with two transmembrane domains, linked by a short highly conserved acidic loop exposedcomplex (called holocomplex or uniplex) has been also obtained both in the intermembrane space (IMS) which contains the so-called acidic “DIME” motif. The acidic residues present in this stretch (in particular E257, D261, E264) are critical for the Ca²⁺ transport since, if substituted with uncharged residues, MCU mutants failed to rescue the mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake in MCU-silenced cells ^[41][42]. However, the definitive description of MCU 3D structure had to wait till the very last years, when cryo-EMpresence and X-ray diffraction analyses finally allowed the resolution of full-length MCU structure ^{[44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51]}. These studies coherently confirmed that purified MCU from different sources (fungi and metazoan) arranges in a tetramer, confuting previous assumptions on a putative pentameric MCU architecture ^[52]. Notably, the cryo-EM data also unveiled the exact position of the MCU channel selectivity filter, in which the DIME motif is fundamental for the coordinationabsence of Ca²⁺ ions and which was definitively shown to reside at the beginning of the second transmembrane α-helix ^[50] and not in the linker region between the two transmembrane helices, as previously suggested ^[52].

More recently, the structure of the human MCU together with its auxiliary component EMRE was obtained ^[53]. Each human MCU arranges in tetramers and each subunit complexes with one EMRE peptide. Differently from the three described for fungal MCU, human MCU appears organized in four domains, which are:[28] (i) the N-terminal domain (NTD), (ii) the linker helix domain (LHD) —absent in fungi—, (iii) the coiled-coil domain (CCD), and iv) the transmembrane domain (TMD) (Figure 2Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2. The MCU holocomplex structure. Schematic representation of the MCU holocomplex (uniplex) components and their relevant domains: the pore-forming subunit MCU (light blue) with the two transmembrane (TM) and coiled-coil (CC) domains and the linker helix domain (LHD); the essential mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uniporter regulator EMRE (yellow); the mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake proteins MICU1 (violet) and MICU2 (purple), with the EF-hands relevant for the MICU dimer interaction highlighted. The critical residues of the MCU DIME motif forming the Ca²⁺ selectivity filter are indicated, together with the MICU1 residues of the K-R ring coordinating the MCU acidic region.

Moreover

In the presence of the ion, the multiprotein holocomplex shows a two-fold symmetry and consists of two V-shaped MCU-EMRE heterotetramers and two MICU1-MICU2 heterodimers that bridge the tops of the MCU-EMRE tetramers (Figure 1) through the interaction between MICU1 and EMRE [29] (Figure 2). Differently, in the very last yearabsence of Ca²⁺, further insight intothe holocomplex adopts a less stable conformation, where the MICU1-MICU2 heterodimer blocks the channel pore formed by the MCU transmembrane domains [29] (Figures 2 and 3).

Sequence and topology analyses revealed that both the N- and C-termini of MCU are located in the mitochondrial matrix and that MCU is endowed with two transmembrane domains, linked by a short highly conserved acidic loop exposed in the intermembrane space (IMS) which contains the so-called acidic “DIME” motif. The acidic residues present in this stretch are critical for the Ca²⁺ coordination and constitute tha selectivity filter of the MCU channel modulation and function has been gained thanks to[23,24].

More recently, the achievementstructure of the human MCU-MICUs holocomplex structure together with its auxiliary component EMRE was obtained [27]. Each human MCU arranges in bothtetramers and each subunit complexes with one EMRE peptide. Human MCU appears organized in various domains, which are: i) the Ca²⁺N-freeterminal domain (NTD), ii) the linker helix domain (LHD) —absent in fungi—, iii) the coiled-coil domains (CC), and Ca²⁺-bound state by several independent reportsiv) the transmembrane domains (TM) (Figure 2).

The gating mechanism by which MICU1 regulates the uniporter activity via the conformational change triggered by Ca²⁺ was finally unveiled [44]. Furthermore, the precise description of the molecular interactions between MCU-EMRE-MICU1-MICU2 in the human MCU supercomplex (MEMMS) has been also obtained ^[54] (Figure 2)2020 [30]. Indeed, MEMMS appears as a 480 kDa integral unit where EMRE coordinates the matrix gate of the MCU channel and interacts with MICU proteins interact with the C-terminus of EMRE in the IMS thus enhancing Ca²⁺ influx through the MCU pore in high [Ca²⁺] conditions [54][28] (Figure 3). Finally, the distinct Ca²⁺-dependent assembly conformations of the beetleFigure 2 and human MCU holocomplexes with human MICUs have also been detailed ^[46][47]3). In the presence of Ca²⁺, the multiprotein complex shows a two-fold symmetry and consists of two V-shaped MCU-EMRE tetrameric subcomplexes and two MICU1-MICU2 heterodimers that bridge the tops of the subcomplexes (Figure 1Figure 1). In this setting, the assembly of the MICU1-MICU2 heterodimers to the MCU-EMRE subcomplexes is ensured by the interaction between MICU1 and EMRE [47][29] (Figure 2Figure 2). Differently, in the absence of Ca²⁺, the holocomplex adopts alternative less stable conformations with both monomeric and dimeric forms of the MCU-EMRE tetramers, where the MICU1-MICU2 heterodimer block the channel entrance formed by MCU transmembrane domains [47][29] (Figure 2Figures 2 and Figure 33).

Figure 3. The MCU complex activity at low and high intracellular Ca²⁺ concentration. Schematic representation of the proteins involved in the MCU complex-mediated mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake: the pore-forming subunits MCU (light blue) and MCUb (green), the essential mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uniporter regulator EMRE (yellow), the mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake proteins MICU1 / MICU1.1 (violet), MICU2/ MICU3 (purple), and the MCU regulator 1 MCUR1 (light violet). The EF-hand Ca²⁺ binding domains of MICU proteins are indicated as little circles. At low intracellular Ca²⁺ concentration, the cation does not permeate through the MCU channel since the heterodimers formed by MICU1/MICU1.1–MICU2/MICU3 block the channel pore, thus preventing Ca²⁺ flux in resting conditions. Differently, at high intracellular Ca²⁺ concentration, MICU proteins undergo conformational changes relieving the inhibition on MCU and positively regulating channel activity, leading to an efficient mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake. OMM, outer mitochondrial membrane; IMM, inner mitochondrial membrane.

A large body of experimental evidence on the MCU complex functional role has accumulated since the discovery of the MCU. The genetic manipulation of the MCU led to the generation of germline and tissue-specific transgenic models ^{[55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62]}, which provided pivotal tools for understanding the pathophysiological implications of the mitochondrial Ca²⁺ signaling in vivo that would have otherwise remained unexplored.

In 2013, three independent groups showed that the MCUMCU silencing/knockout or its overexpression affect survival in different in vivoin vivo models [55]^[63][64][31–33]. In Trypanosoma brucei, for instance, the downregulation or the conditional knockout of the uniporter augments the AMP/ATP ratio, thus affecting the parasite growth in vitro. On the contrary, when MCU is overexpressed, mitochondrial Ca²⁺ accumulation produces a high concentration of ROS and sensitizes trypanosomes to apoptotic stimuli ^[63]. In zebrafish (Danio rerio), instead, the knockdown of MCU has shown crucial alterations not only during the early step of gastrulation, where the blastomere convergence and extension are altered, but also at later stages of development as the maturation of the notochord and anteroposterior axis formation were strongly impaired in morphant fish ^[64]. A series of recently published works and our unpublished observation in the zebrafish knockout model obtained with CRISPR/Cas9 gene ablation gave further insight into the role of MCU during development. For example, the ablation of the MCU gene in Danio rerio inhibits mitochondrial Ca²⁺ influx, reduces oxidative phosphorylation, and induces lipid accumulation, a phenotype that was also observed in the hepatic tissue of liver-specific KO mouse ^[65]. Notably, the inactivation of MCU has shown to be protective in neurons of Parkinson Disease zebrafish genetic model (namely in pink^−/− fish), suggesting the crucial role of the MCU-dependent mitochondrial Ca²⁺ load on neuronal fitness ^[66].

As for mammals, theThe MCU^–/– mouse [55][31] develops normally and displays minor defects (only mild metabolic alterations after stress conditions) without signs of impaired cell survival. Under stress conditions, relatively mild metabolic alterations were observed, such as increased plasma lactate levels in line with impaired exercise performance. However, the same group soon after those findings, showed that embryos from MCU^−/− mice, in a pure C57BL/6 background, MCU^−/− mouse embryos were not viable, displaying embryonic lethality at around E 11.5–E 13.5, thus suggesting a major involvement of mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake in organ metabolism and organism development that was compensated in a mixed genetic background [67][34].

Of note

Interestingly, some years later, it has been reported that the block of MCU-dependent Ca²⁺ uptake affects Drosophila melanogasterDrosophila melanogaster development. In particular, the inhibition of the uniporter activity has been shown to be detrimental for and memory establishment during the papulation stage[35]. Indeed, during the development of adult flies, alterations in the structural and functional neuronal substrates, crucial for memory formation, occur in the MCU deficient fly ^[58].

The genetic manipulation of MCU in C. elegans model also provided additional interesting notions on its role in organism physiology. Indeed, MCU^−/−C. elegans is viable and grossly normal, mirroring what was found in the first MCU^−/− mouse model described ^[55], even though it presents some defects in the epidermal wound repair mechanisms. More recently, the characterization of C. elegans deficient of a functional MCU ^[68] suggested that uniporter activity is essential for mitochondrial Ca²⁺ transfer during high-intensity stimulation of the worm pharynx muscle. However, a lot still remains to be explored on the role of MCU in this model and most of the knowledge on mitochondrial Ca²⁺ regulation of muscle physiology has been achieved using the mammalian mouse model where MCU expression was genetically targeted, which we will briefly review in the following paragraphs.

3.2. MCUb

In 2013, Raffaello and co-authors discovered that

MCU is not the only pore-forming subunit of the mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uniporter, since an alternative MCU isoform exists,was discovered in 2013 and named MCUb, which. It crosses the IMM and associates to MCU to form the calcium channel [69][36] (Figure 1Figures 1 and Figure 33). The MCUb protein is encoded by the MCU CCDC109a paralog gene CCDC109b. Interestingly, this gene is found in vertebrates, but it is not present in other organisms in which MCU is expressed, such as plants, Nematoda, and Arthropoda. Despite the high structural similarity with MCU, MCUb sequence presents differences in two critical aminoacidic substitutionspositions in the loop region and in the TM1 domain, which explains its inability to transportimpede Ca²⁺ transport. IndeedThus, MCUb acts as a MCU negative regulator of MCU activity, drastically reducing mitochondrial Ca²⁺ currents in vitro in planar lipid bilayer experimentsboth in vitro and also when overexpressed in mammalian cells [69][36]. On the contraryHowever, in other organisms, such as trypanosomatid species, the orthologorthologue of MCUb is capable to conduct the cation and its overexpression facilitates mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake [70][37].

Interestingly

Notably, MCUb displaysis expressed at different expression levels in the different mammalian tissues, and the MCUb:MCU proportion appears also theresults a distinctive feature of each cell-type ensuring the appropriate mitochondrial Ca²⁺ current to each cell type ^[69][71]of them [36,38]. For instanceAs an example, adult cardiomyocytes have a high MCUb/MCU ratio (3:1) is typical of cells with lowand display relatively modest mitochondrial Ca²⁺ transients, such as adult cardiomyocytes (Figure 4Figure 4). In factOn the contray, MCUb can be described as a protective gene in cardiac myocytes since i) its expression is transiently induced after ischemia-reperfusion injuryskeletal muscle and ii) transgenic mice overexpressing MCUbneuronal cells have a reduced mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake ability, thus preventing Ca²⁺ overload, which is sufficient to protect myocytes from ischemia-reperfusion injury and to decelerate their ongoing necrosis ^[72][73]. A low MCUb/MCU ratio (1:40) is instead a characteristic of tissues withand are characterized by an extremely high capacity of mitochondrialto accumulate Ca²⁺ accumulation, such as skeletal muscle ^[69][74]in mitochondria [36,39] (Figure 4Figure 4).

Figure 4. MCU holocomplex composition in different tissues. Schematic representation of the tissue-specific components of the MCU holo-complex. The presence of a relatively high MCUb:MCU ratio in the heart ensures a re-duced Ca²⁺ load in cardiomyocyte mitochondria. On the contrary, the expression of the MICU1.1 variant and MICU3 determines an elevated Ca²⁺ flux in the mitochondria of skeletal muscle fibers and neurons, respectively. IMS, inter-membrane space; IMM, inner mitochondrial membrane.

These lines of evidence highlight the importance of MCU:MCUb proportion in the control of mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uniporter activity and further investigation will be of fundamental relevance for the understanding of its role in the pathophysiology of different tissues.

3.3. MICU1

MICU1 was actually the first component to be described as the regulator of the long-sought MCU channel and its identification even anticipated that of the pore-forming subunit MCU (Figure 1Figure 1). Indeed, in 2010, an integrative strategy combining comparative physiology, evolutionary genomics, and organelle proteomicsstrategy revealed the 54 kDa protein, encoded byproduct of the CBARACBARA gene and residing in the IMS, to be the mitochondrial calcium uptake 1 (MICU1), which. MICU1 resides in the IMS and does not take part to the pore-forming domain of the channel, but it strongly regulates its activity in a Ca²⁺-dependent way [40]^[75]. Indeed, after the N-terminal mitochondrial targeting sequence, MICU1 shows[26,40]since it possesses two canonical EF-hand Ca²⁺ binding EF-hand domains that confers the Ca²⁺-sensitivity (Figure 2Figures 2 and Figure 33). In the last decade, several lines of evidence confirmed the initial hypothesis about the role ofThis allows MICU1 to act as both MCU gatekeeper, at low Ca²⁺ concentration, and MCU positive regulator, at high Ca²⁺ concentration, thus explaining the sigmoid cooperative effect of the MCU activation curve ^[75] [40].

The downregulation of MICU1 was initially shown to abolishabolishes mitochondrial Ca²⁺ influx in intactcells [26] and permeabilized HeLa cells ^[40]. Later studies also demonstrated that the absence of MICU1 also leads to an adaptive Ca²⁺ accumulation inside the mitochondria matrix, triggering excessive ROS production and the consequent higher sensitivity to apoptotic stress. In addition, the ability of MICU1 to sense cytosolic Ca²⁺ levels confers to MICU1 the capacity to set the threshold for the activation of mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake. Nevertheless, this occurs without altering the overall kinetics of the channel ^[75][76].

Two in vivo studies, performed in MICU1^-/- mouse models have strengthened this concept and gave additional insight into the physiological role of this MCU regulator. In more detail, the

The characterization of MICU1^-/- transgenic mice reveals that, despite partial postnatal mortality, the viable animals show marked ataxia and muscle weakness [77][41], a phenotype which is reminiscent ofsimilar to that of human patients bearing MICU1 genomic mutation [78][42]. Moreover, the MICU1^−/− mice display several biochemical defects, including an increase in resting mitochondrial Ca²⁺ levels, altered mitochondrial morphology, and a decreased ATP production ^[77]. Interestingly, the loss of MICU1 triggers a sustained pro-inflammatory response after partial hepatectomy and failure of liver regeneration in MICU1-deficient mice. In this scenario, the lack of MICU1 enhances mitochondrial permeability transition pore (PTP) opening in hepatocytes, thus leading to massive necrosis ^[79].

Interestingly, moreMore recently, evidence of a new Ca²⁺-independent role of MICU1 in the regulation of crucial metabolic steps of cell metabolism has emerged. Indeed, MICU1 was shown to inhibitvia inhibition of the mitochondrial transport of pyruvate and fatty acids and, interestingly, this MICU1 function appears independent of Ca²⁺ and MCU core-complex composition ^[80]has emerged [43]. This study reveals a mechanism that controls the MCU-mediated Ca²⁺ flux machinery and that relies on TCA cycle substrate availability. According to this view, the MICU1 regulatory axis acts as a metabolic homeostatic circuit to protect cells from the risk of bioenergetic crisis and mitochondrial Ca²⁺ overload during periods of nutrient stress. Altogether these findings ^[77][79][80] highlight once more the crucial importance of the fine-tuning of mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake by Ca²⁺ and MICUs, especially in the context of promotion of cell survival under stress conditions.

In addition to that, new important functions of MICU1 in the control of mitochondrial cristae junctions have been revealed by the recent super-resolution structured illumination microscopy (SIM) and electron microscopy studies of Gottschalk and collaborators ^[81]. According to the authors, MICU1 appears to act as a Ca²⁺-dependent regulator of cristae junctions’ integrity and cytochrome c localization. Another intriguing feature of MICU1 regulatory function on the determination of uniporter cation selectivity has recently emerged ^[82]. MICU1 was revealed as the primaryis responsible for conferring and ensuring the stringent MCU selectivity for Ca²⁺ over Mn²⁺ since. Indeed[44], when present, MICU1 impedes Mn²⁺ ions to cross the MCU channel pore; on the contrary, in the absence of MICU1, both Ca²⁺ and Mn²⁺ cations can enter the mitochondrial matrix. This additional MICU1 checkpointwhich is of fundamental importancecrucial to guarantee cellthe survival of cells sensitive to Mn²⁺ such as neurons. Finally, thus settingsuper-resolution and electron microscopy studies showed that MICU1 asalso controls mitochondrial cristae junctions’ integrity [45].

Interestingly, a crucial safeguard against cellular toxicity due to manganese in neurodegenerative diseases ^[82].

3.4. MICU1.1

Asecond variant of MICU1, named MICU1.1, has been discovered by our group as an alternative splicing product of the MICU1MICU1 mRNA [83][46] (Figure 1Figure 1). MICU1.1 is well-conserved among species and expressed almost exclusively in skeletal muscle tissue and, where it is by far the most abundant MICU moiety (Figure 4)to a less extent, although limited but still appreciable levels are found also in the brain [83][46] (Figure 4). Similar to MICU1, MICU1.1 behaves as a positive regulator of MCU. Indeed, MICU1.1 expression increases mitochondrialsimilarly and even more powerful than MICU1 due to its more efficient Ca²⁺ uptake upon stimulation in HeLa cells and skeletal muscle in vivo-binding, and this increase is even higher than that observed after expression ofwhich leads to the conventional MICU1 isoform ^[83]. This behavior is explained by the fact that the muscular MICU1.1-MICU2 heterodimer (see next paragraph for a detailed descriptionactivation of MICU2), binds Ca²⁺ more efficiently than the canonical MICU1-MICU2 pair, thus activating the uniporter at lower Ca²⁺ concentrations [83][46]. This peculiar feature is of critical importance for the physiology of skeletal muscle tissue, and the presence of MICU1.1 is functional to ensure the Ca²⁺ uptake required for the matching of ATP production to the energy expenditure of muscle contractile activity ^[83]. These findings shed light on a novel modality by which MCU machinery can be modulated in skeletal muscle mitochondria and widen the scenario of the possible endogenous regulators of mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake, opening the path for future investigations on other tissue-specific isoforms and mechanisms controlling mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake.

3.53.4. MICU2

The first information about the existence of other genuine MCU regulatorsmitochondrial calcium uptake protein 2 or MICU2, in addition to MICU1, was provided by human genome sequencing studies a few years later ^[84] (Figure 1). Initially known also as EF-hand domain-containing family member A1 (EFHA1), the mitochondrial calcium uptake protein 2 or MICU2, was found to be a paralog of MICU1 [84][47] (Figure 1). MICU2 resides in the IMS, contains two EF-hand Ca²⁺-binding domains, and interacts with both MICU1 and MCU [84][47] (Figure 2Figure 2). The analysis of MICU2 transcript expression shown that this regulator has a peculiar cell-type distribution: itIt is present at high levels in the intestine, prostate, and cardiac tissues [84]. Biochemical data evidenced that MICU2and its stability is strictly dependentdepends on the presence of MICU1: indeed, silencing of MICU1 leads to loss of also MICU2 protein, while MICU1 (or MCU) overexpression stabilizes both MICUs in mammalian cells ^[84] [47]. Moreover, the recently reported human MICU1-MICU2 crystal structure ^[45][85] revealed interesting details on the architecture of the heterodimer and of MICU2 in both the Ca²⁺-bound and Ca²⁺-free condition. The MICU1-MICU2 interaction sites have been identified and correspond to Glu242 in MICU1 and Arg352 in MICU2 in the Ca²⁺-free state, while Phe383 in MICU1 and Glu196 in MICU2 contribute to the interaction of the two proteins in the Ca²⁺-bound state.

Although the functional role of MICU2 is still controversial, recent findings clarify some key aspects of uniporter modulation by this regulator. In mammalian cells, for example, itIt has been shown that MICU2 positively regulates MCU activation by controlling the cytosolic [Ca²⁺] threshold for the relief of MICU1-mediated inhibition of MCU [48]. This function allows MICU2 to restrict the spatial Ca²⁺ crosstalk between inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor (InsP3R) and MCU channels ^[86].

Subsequently, the generation and characterization of the MICU2^−/− mouse model highlighted other important properties of this regulator ^[87].

The MICU2 genetic ablation in mouse produces a decrease in the threshold for mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake due to loss of the gatekeeping activity and overall loss of MCU-dependent Ca²⁺ influx due to the destabilization of the entire uniporter complex [49]. These findings lead to the conclusion that the amount of MCU and MICUs proteins is crucial to maintain the stability of the whole complex. Moreover, some phenotypic features of the MICU2^−/− mice are in common with models of cardiac pathologies, suggesting that MICU2 may act as a possible cardioprotective factor.

3.63.5. MICU3

MICU3, previously known as EFHA2, is another MICU1 paralog, originally identified by the same genetic sequence analysis that described MICU2 ^[84] [47] (Figure 1Figure 1). This finding added another level of complexity to the regulation of the MCU machinery. MICU3 is an evolutionarily conserved gene since it is present in plants and in vertebrates, with a peculiar tissue-specific distribution: indeed, it is mainly expressed in the brain, much less expressed in skeletal muscle, and virtually absent in other tissues [88]^[89][50,51]. The MICU3 gene encodes a 55 kDa protein that shares 34% and 47% protein sequence similarity with MICU1 and MICU2, respectively ^[84]. LikeAs the other MICUs, also MICU3 has an N-terminal mitochondrial targeting sequence and binds Ca²⁺ thanks to the presence of EF-hand domains. The crystal structure of human MICU3 has been recently characterizedcrystallographic analysis in both Ca²⁺-free and Ca²⁺-bound conditions [90]. This crystallographic analysis[52] revealed a MICU3 3D structure and function very similar to that of MICU2, in line with the role of these factors as MCU channel gatekeepers at low intracellular Ca²⁺ levels. Upon cytosolic Ca²⁺ increase, MICU heterodimers, including those containing MICU3, undergo a conformational change that releases the latch formed upon the uniporter mouth, thus allowing Ca²⁺ flux through the MCU pore ^[90] (Figure 3Figures 3 and Figure 44).

Regarding its functional role, our group showed that

MICU3 actsfunctions as a potent positive regulator of mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake through MICU1 ^[88]. Indeed, MICU3 forms heterodimers exclusivelyheterodimerization with MICU1, but not with MICU2, and the MICU1-MICU3 interaction leads to a significant increase of mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake, demonstrating the stimulatory action of MICU3 on uniporter activity ^[88] [50]. Moreover, MICU3 downregulation blocks Ca²⁺ influx elicited by synaptic activity in primary cortical neurons, suggesting a specific role of this MCU regulator on neuronal function ^[88]. This line ofThe experimental evidence letslead to hypothesize that the primary role of MICU3 is to enhance MCU openingchannel activity in neurons to ensure efficient mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake in response to both small and fast cytosolic Ca²⁺ rises, typical of synaptic neuronal stimulation (Figure 4Figure 4).

3.73.6. EMRE

The Essential MCU REgulator (EMRE) is an additional constituent of the uniporter,was discovered by quantitative mass spectrometry analysis of affinity-purified MCU complex components [91][91] (Figure 1Figure 1). EMRE is a metazoan-specific protein of 10 kDa, ubiquitously expressed in all mammalian tissue, with onea single transmembrane domain, a mitochondrial targeting sequence, and a highly conserved C-terminus ^[91] [91]. Moreover, itIt is required for the binding of MICU1 to MCU (Figure 2Figure 2). Initial biochemical and cellular studies revealed that it is required for MCU function [91]^[92]. Indeed, in yeast cells, reconstituted with human MCU protein, the expression of MCU alone is not sufficient for uniporter activity, because the MCU channel is active only when also EMRE is co-expressed with the MCU pore-forming unit ^[92]. Interestingly, the knockdown of EMRE led to the loss of mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake to a similar extent to what was observed in MCU-silenced HEK-293T and HeLa cells ^[91]. The following studies tried to give a more detailed explanation of the EMRE function within the MCU complex ^[93][91,92]. EMRE was shown to control MCU activity by sensing Ca²⁺ elevation inside the matrix via its CC-terminal domain and coordinating the other MCU regulators. Indeed, when EMRE acidic C-terminus was either deleted or substituted with neutral residues, mitochondrial Ca²⁺ permeation through the uniporter increased and the Ca²⁺ concentration inside the matrix consistently augmented ^[93]. After that, a dual-mode of action for the small MCU regulator has been proposed, in contrast with the previously described model ^[94] [93]. According to this viewanother model, EMRE stimulates MCU channel activity via the interaction of transmembrane helices from both proteins, proposing a different EMRE orientation in which the NN-terminus is present inside the matrix, while its CC-terminal portion faces the IMS. In addition, EMRE was proposed to exert its thus stimulating MCU-regulation activity via transmembrane helix interaction [94] and also by binding MICU1 via its conserved C-terminal poly-aspartate tail (Figure 2). In the same year, another interesting aspect of EMRE-dependentfavoring MCU regulationdimerization [53].

3.7. MCUR1

The CCDC90A gene, known as mitochondrial calcium uniporter regulator 1 or MCUR1, has been revealed: the m-AAA protease-mediated degradation of EMRE isfirstly identified from an essential event to guarantee the correct MCU-MICU proteins’ assembly ^[95]. Indeed, the deficiency of m-AAA leads to EMRE accumulation, which prevents the MCU-MICUs association by competingRNAi screening searching for MCU binding. This generates a constitutively active MCU-EMRE channel that finally inducesmitochondrial membrane components involved in mitochondrial Ca²⁺ overload and eventually death of neuronal cellsuptake regulation [53] (Figure 1).

The entry is from: 10.3390/biom11060786

4. References

1. Raffaello, A.; Mammucari, C.; Gherardi, G.; Rizzuto, R. Calcium at the Center of Cell Signaling: Interplay between Endoplasmic Reticulum, Mitochondria, and Lysosomes. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2016, 41, 1035–1049, doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2016.09.001.
2. Clapham, D.E. Calcium Signaling. Cell 2007, 131, 1047–1058, doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.028.
3. Berridge, M.J.; Lipp, P.; Bootman, M.D. The versatility and universality of calcium signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2000, 1, 11–21.
4. Rizzuto, R.; Pozzan, T. Microdomains of Intracellular Ca 2+ : Molecular Determinants and Functional Consequences. Physiol. Rev. 2006, 86, 369–408, doi:10.1152/physrev.00004.2005.
5. Denton, R.M.; Randle, P.J.; Martin, B.R. Stimulation by calcium ions of pyruvate dehydrogenase phosphate phosphatase. Biochem. J. 1972, 128, 161–163, doi:10.1042/bj1280161.
6. Denton, R.M.; Richards, D.A.; Chin, J.G. Calcium ions and the regulation of NAD+-linked isocitrate dehydrogenase from the mitochondria of rat heart and other tissues. Biochem. J. 1978, 176, 899–906, doi:10.1042/bj1760899.
7. McCormack, J.G.; Denton, R.M. The effects of calcium ions and adenine nucleotides on the activity of pig heart 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex. Biochem. J. 1979, 180, 533–544, doi:10.1042/bj1800533.
8. Territo, P.R.; Mootha, V.K.; French, S.A.; Balaban, R.S. Ca2+ activation of heart mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation: Role of the F0/F1-ATPase. Am. J. Physiol. - Cell Physiol. 2000, 278, doi:10.1152/ajpcell.2000.278.2.c423.
9. Glancy, B.; Willis, W.T.; Chess, D.J.; Balaban, R.S. Effect of calcium on the oxidative phosphorylation cascade in skeletal muscle mitochondria. Biochemistry 2013, 52, 2793–2809, doi:10.1021/bi3015983.
10. Ringer, S. A third contribution regarding the Influence of the Inorganic Constituents of the Blood on the Ventricular Contraction. J. Physiol. 1883, 4, 222–225, doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1883.sp000127.
11. Slater, E.C.; Cleland, K.W. The effect of calcium on the respiratory and phosphorylative activities of heart-muscle sarcosomes. Biochem. J. 1953, 55, 566–580, doi:10.1042/bj0550566.
12. Mitchell, P. Coupling of phosphorylation to electron and hydrogen transfer by a chemi-osmotic type of mechanism. Nature 1961, 191, 144–148, doi:10.1038/191144a0.
13. Stathopulos, P.B.; Ikura, M. Store operated calcium entry: From concept to structural mechanisms. Cell Calcium 2017, 63, 3–7.
14. DeLuca, H.F.; Engstrom, G.W. Calcium uptake by rat kidney mitochondria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1961, 47, 1744–1750, doi:10.1073/pnas.47.11.1744.
15. Lehninger, A.L.; Rossi, C.S.; Greenawalt, J.W. Respiration-dependent accumulation of inorganic phosphate and Ca++ by rat liver mitochondria. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1963, 10, 444–448, doi:10.1016/0006-291X(63)90377-2.
16. Ridgway, E.B.; Ashley, C.C. Calcium transients in single muscle fibers. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1967, 29, 229–234, doi:10.1016/0006-291X(67)90592-X.
17. Rudolf, R.; Mongillo, M.; Rizzuto, R.; Pozzan, T. Looking forward to seeing calcium. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003, 4, 579–586, doi:10.1038/nrm1153.
18. Takahashi, A.; Camacho, P.; Lechleiter, J.D.; Herman, B. Measurement of intracellular calcium. Physiol. Rev. 1999, 79, 1089–1125.
19. Carafoli, E. The interplay of mitochondria with calcium: An historical appraisal. Cell Calcium 2012, 52, 1–8, doi:10.1016/j.ceca.2012.02.007.
20. De Giorgi, F.; Brini, M.; Bastianutto, C.; Marsault, R.; Montero, M.; Pizzo, P.; Rossi, R.; Rizzuto, R. Targeting aequorin and green fluorescent protein to intracellular organelles. In Proceedings of the Gene; Elsevier B.V., 1996; Vol. 173, pp. 113–117.
21. Rizzuto, R.; Pinton, P.; Carrington, W.; Fay, F.; Fogarty, K.; Lifshitz, L.; Tuft, R.; Pozzan, T. Close Contacts with the Endoplasmic Reticulum as Determinants of Mitochondrial Ca2+ Responses. Science (80-. ). 1998, 280, 1763–1766, doi:10.1126/science.280.5370.1763.
22. Rizzuto, R.; Brini, M.; Murgia, M.; Pozzan, T. Microdomains with high Ca2+ close to IP3-sensitive channels that are sensed by neighboring mitochondria. Science 1993, 262, 744–7.
23. De Stefani, D.; Raffaello, A.; Teardo, E.; Szabò, I.; Rizzuto, R. A forty-kilodalton protein of the inner membrane is the mitochondrial calcium uniporter. Nature 2011, 476, 336–40, doi:10.1038/nature10230.
24. Baughman, J.M.; Perocchi, F.; Girgis, H.S.; Plovanich, M.; Belcher-Timme, C. a; Sancak, Y.; Bao, X.R.; Strittmatter, L.; Goldberger, O.; Bogorad, R.L.; et al. Integrative genomics identifies MCU as an essential component of the mitochondrial calcium uniporter. Nature 2011, 476, 341–345, doi:10.1038/nature10234.
25. Kovács-Bogdán, E.; Sancak, Y.; Kamer, K.J.; Plovanich, M.; Jambhekar, A.; Huber, R.J.; Myre, M.A.; Blower, M.D.; Mootha, V.K. Reconstitution of the mitochondrial calcium uniporter in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014, 111, 8985–90, doi:10.1073/pnas.1400514111.
26. Perocchi, F.; Gohil, V.M.; Girgis, H.S.; Bao, X.R.; McCombs, J.E.; Palmer, A.E.; Mootha, V.K. MICU1 encodes a mitochondrial EF hand protein required for Ca2+uptake. Nature 2010, 467, 291–296, doi:10.1038/nature09358.
27. Wang, Y.; Nguyen, N.X.; She, J.; Zeng, W.; Yang, Y.; Bai, X. chen; Jiang, Y. Structural Mechanism of EMRE-Dependent Gating of the Human Mitochondrial Calcium Uniporter. Cell 2019, 177, doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.050.
28. Zhuo, W.; Zhou, H.; Guo, R.; Yi, J.; Zhang, L.; Yu, L.; Sui, Y.; Zeng, W.; Wang, P.; Yang, M. Structure of intact human MCU supercomplex with the auxiliary MICU subunits. Protein Cell 2020.
29. Wang, C.; Jacewicz, A.; Delgado, B.D.; Baradaran, R.; Long, S.B. Structures reveal gatekeeping of the mitochondrial Ca2+ uniporter by MICU1-MICU2. Elife 2020, 9, 1–30, doi:10.7554/eLife.59991.
30. Fan, M.; Zhang, J.; Tsai, C.W.; Orlando, B.J.; Rodriguez, M.; Xu, Y.; Liao, M.; Tsai, M.F.; Feng, L. Structure and mechanism of the mitochondrial Ca2+ uniporter holocomplex. Nature 2020, doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2309-6.
31. Pan, X.; Liu, J.; Nguyen, T.; Liu, C.; Sun, J.; Teng, Y.; Fergusson, M.M.; Rovira, I.I.; Allen, M.; Springer, D.A.; et al. The Physiological Role of Mitochondrial Calcium Revealed by Mice Lacking the Mitochondrial Calcium Uniporter. Nat. Cell Biol. 2013, 15, 1464–1472, doi:10.1038/ncb2868.
32. Huang, G.; Vercesi, A.E.; Docampo, R. Essential regulation of cell bioenergetics in Trypanosoma brucei by the mitochondrial calcium uniporter. Nat. Commun. 2013, doi:10.1038/ncomms3865.
33. Prudent, J.; Popgeorgiev, N.; Bonneau, B.; Thibaut, J.; Gadet, R.; Lopez, J.; Gonzalo, P.; Rimokh, R.; Manon, S.; Houart, C.; et al. Bcl-wav and the mitochondrial calcium uniporter drive gastrula morphogenesis in zebrafish. Nat. Commun. 2013, doi:10.1038/ncomms3330.
34. Murphy, E.; Pan, X.; Nguyen, T.; Liu, J.; Holmström, K.M.; Finkel, T. Unresolved questions from the analysis of mice lacking MCU expression. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 449, 384–385, doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.04.144.
35. Drago, I.; Davis, R.L. Inhibiting the Mitochondrial Calcium Uniporter during Development Impairs Memory in Adult Drosophila. Cell Rep. 2016, doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.08.017.
36. Raffaello, A.; De Stefani, D.; Sabbadin, D.; Teardo, E.; Merli, G.; Picard, A.; Checchetto, V.; Moro, S.; Szabò, I.; Rizzuto, R. The mitochondrial calcium uniporter is a multimer that can include a dominant-negative pore-forming subunit. EMBO J. 2013, 32157, 2362–2376, doi:10.1038/emboj.2013.157.
37. Chiurillo, M.A.; Lander, N.; Bertolini, M.S.; Storey, M.; Vercesi, A.E.; Docampo, R. Different Roles of Mitochondrial Calcium Uniporter Complex Subunits in Growth and Infectivity of Trypanosoma cruzi. MBio 2017, 8, e00574-17, doi:10.1128/mBio.00574-17.
38. Fieni, F.; Lee, S.B.; Jan, Y.N.; Kirichok, Y. Activity of the mitochondrial calcium uniporter varies greatly between tissues. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 1317, doi:10.1038/ncomms2325.
39. Mammucari, C.; Raffaello, A.; Vecellio Reane, D.; Gherardi, G.; De Mario, A.; Rizzuto, R. Mitochondrial calcium uptake in organ physiology: from molecular mechanism to animal models. Pflügers Arch. - Eur. J. Physiol. 2018, 470, 1165–1179, doi:10.1007/s00424-018-2123-2.
40. Csordás, G.; Golenár, T.; Seifert, E.L.; Kamer, K.J.; Sancak, Y.; Perocchi, F.; Moffat, C.; Weaver, D.; Perez, S.D.L.F.; Bogorad, R.; et al. MICU1 controls both the threshold and cooperative activation of the mitochondrial Ca2+ uniporter. Cell Metab. 2013, 17, 976–987, doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2013.04.020.
41. Liu, J.C.; Liu, J.; Holmström, K.M.; Menazza, S.; Parks, R.J.; Fergusson, M.M.; Yu, Z.X.; Springer, D.A.; Halsey, C.; Liu, C.; et al. MICU1 Serves as a Molecular Gatekeeper to Prevent In Vivo Mitochondrial Calcium Overload. Cell Rep. 2016, 16, 1561–1573, doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.07.011.
42. Logan, C. V; Szabadkai, G.; Sharpe, J.A.; Parry, D.A.; Torelli, S.; Childs, A.-M.; Kriek, M.; Phadke, R.; Johnson, C.A.; Roberts, N.Y.; et al. Loss-of-function mutations in MICU1 cause a brain and muscle disorder linked to primary alterations in mitochondrial calcium signaling. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46, 188–93, doi:10.1038/ng.2851.
43. Nemani, N.; Dong, Z.; Daw, C.C.; Madaris, T.R.; Ramachandran, K.; Enslow, B.T.; Rubannelsonkumar, C.S.; Shanmughapriya, S.; Mallireddigari, V.; Maity, S.; et al. Mitochondrial pyruvate and fatty acid flux modulate MICU1-dependent control of MCU activity. Sci. Signal. 2020, 13, 6206, doi:10.1126/scisignal.aaz6206.
44. Kamer, K.J.; Sancak, Y.; Fomina, Y.; Meisel, J.D.; Chaudhuri, D.; Grabarek, Z.; Mootha, V.K. MICU1 imparts the mitochondrial uniporter with the ability to discriminate between Ca2+ and Mn2+. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2018, 115, E7960–E7969, doi:10.1073/pnas.1807811115.
45. Gottschalk, B.; Klec, C.; Leitinger, G.; Bernhart, E.; Rost, R.; Bischof, H.; Madreiter-Sokolowski, C.T.; Radulović, S.; Eroglu, E.; Sattler, W.; et al. MICU1 controls cristae junction and spatially anchors mitochondrial Ca2+ uniporter complex. Nat. Commun. 2019, doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11692-x.
46. Vecellio Reane, D.; Vallese, F.; Checchetto, V.; Acquasaliente, L.; Butera, G.; De Filippis, V.; Szabò, I.; Zanotti, G.; Rizzuto, R.; Raffaello, A. A MICU1 Splice Variant Confers High Sensitivity to the Mitochondrial Ca2+ Uptake Machinery of Skeletal Muscle. Mol. Cell 2016, 64, 760–773, doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2016.10.001.
47. Plovanich, M.; Bogorad, R.L.; Sancak, Y.; Kamer, K.J.; Strittmatter, L.; Li, A.A.; Girgis, H.S.; Kuchimanchi, S.; De Groot, J.; Speciner, L.; et al. MICU2, a Paralog of MICU1, Resides within the Mitochondrial Uniporter Complex to Regulate Calcium Handling. PLoS One 2013, 8, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055785.
48. Payne, R.; Hoff, H.; Roskowski, A.; Foskett Correspondence, J.K.; Foskett, J.K. MICU2 Restricts Spatial Crosstalk between InsP 3 R and MCU Channels by Regulating Threshold and Gain of MICU1-Mediated Inhibition and Activation of MCU. Cell Rep. 2017, 21, 3141–3154, doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2017.11.064.
49. Bick, A.G.; Wakimoto, H.; Kamer, K.J.; Sancak, Y.; Goldberger, O.; Axelsson, A.; DeLaughter, D.M.; Gorham, J.M.; Mootha, V.K.; Seidman, J.G.; et al. Cardiovascular homeostasis dependence on MICU2, a regulatory subunit of the mitochondrial calcium uniporter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2017, 114, 201711303, doi:10.1073/pnas.1711303114.
50. Patron, M.; Granatiero, V.; Espino, J.; Rizzuto, R.; De Stefani, D. MICU3 is a tissue-specific enhancer of mitochondrial calcium uptake. Cell Death Differ. 2018, doi:10.1038/s41418-018-0113-8.
51. Márkus, N.M.; Hasel, P.; Qiu, J.; Bell, K.F.S.; Heron, S.; Kind, P.C.; Dando, O.; Simpson, T.I.; Hardingham, G.E. Expression of mRNA encoding Mcu and other mitochondrial calcium regulatory genes depends on cell type, neuronal subtype, and ca2+ signaling. PLoS One 2016, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0148164.
52. Xing, Y.; Wang, M.; Wang, J.; Nie, Z.; Wu, G.; Yang, X.; Shen, Y. Dimerization of MICU Proteins Controls Ca2+ Influx through the Mitochondrial Ca2+ Uniporter. Cell Rep. 2019, doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.01.022.
53. Mallilankaraman, K.; Cárdenas, C.; Doonan, P.J.; Chandramoorthy, H.C.; Irrinki, K.M.; Golenár, T.; Csordás, G.; Madireddi, P.; Yang, J.; Müller, M.; et al. MCUR1 is an essential component of mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake that regulates cellular metabolism. Nat. Cell Biol. 2012, 14, 1336–1343, doi:10.1038/ncb2622.
54. Adlakha, J.; Karamichali, I.; Sangwallek, J.; Deiss, S.; Bär, K.; Coles, M.; Hartmann, M.D.; Lupas, A.N.; Hernandez Alvarez, B. Characterization of MCU-Binding Proteins MCUR1 and CCDC90B — Representatives of a Protein Family Conserved in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotic Organelles. Structure 2019, doi:10.1016/j.str.2018.11.004.
55. Paupe, V.; Prudent, J.; Dassa, E.P.; Rendon, O.Z.; Shoubridge, E.A. CCDC90A (MCUR1) is a cytochrome c oxidase assembly factor and not a regulator of the mitochondrial calcium uniporter. Cell Metab. 2015, 21, 109–116, doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2014.12.004.
56. Vais, H.; Tanis, J.E.; Müller, M.; Payne, R.; Mallilankaraman, K.; Foskett, J.K. MCUR1, CCDC90A, is a regulator of the mitochondrial calcium uniporter. Cell Metab. 2015, 22, 533–535.
57. Zulkifli, M.; Neff, J.K.; Timbalia, S.A.; Garza, N.M.; Chen, Y.; Watrous, J.D.; Murgia, M.; Trivedi, P.P.; Anderson, S.K.; Tomar, D.; et al. Yeast homologs of human MCUR1 regulate mitochondrial proline metabolism. Nat. Commun. 2020, doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18704-1.
58. Chaudhuri, D.; Artiga, D.J.; Abiria, S.A.; Clapham, D.E. Mitochondrial calcium uniporter regulator 1 (MCUR1) regulates the calcium threshold for the mitochondrial permeability transition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2016, 113, E1872–E1880, doi:10.1073/pnas.1602264113.
59. Natarajan, V.; Mah, T.; Peishi, C.; Tan, S.Y.; Chawla, R.; Arumugam, T.V.; Ramasamy, A.; Mallilankaraman, K. Oxygen Glucose Deprivation Induced Prosurvival Autophagy Is Insufficient to Rescue Endothelial Function. Front. Physiol. 2020, doi:10.3389/fphys.2020.533683.