1. Introduction

Plants are indispensable resources that are present on the earth. They play an important role in the development of the society and they have great significance in environmental protection, medical pharmaceutical, agricultural development, and food-related applications ^[1]. However, any plant-related work, such as plant species and diseases identification and evaluation of plant production, is becoming increasingly complex. An important starting point for any plant-related work is the identification of plant phenotype that refers to the physiological and biochemical characteristics of plants, including their color, shape, texture, and so on, which are determined by both genes and the environment. Traditional methods of plant phenotype identification include artificial identification, phytochemical classification, the anatomical method, morphological method, and genetic method, which are difficult to implement, have low efficiency, and unstable accuracy ^[2]. With the development and popularity of computer technology, image recognition technology is becoming increasingly mature, and it has been successfully applied in many fields, such as face recognition, object detection, medical imaging, etc. ^[3][4]. Plant phenotype identification tht is based on image processing technology has become a popular topic of research, leading to new breakthroughs and improved accuracy. In particular, deep learning has been proposed in order to further promote the development of PPIR^[5]. Table 1 shows recent relevant reviews.

2. PPIR Technology

2.1. State of the Art in PPIR Technology

The development of PPIR technology started several decades earlier internationally, focusing on feature extraction and training of plants using traditional methods. In the 1980s and 1990s, Ingrouille et al. ^[12], from the University of London, extracted 27 main characteristics of plant leaves and used principal components analysis (PCA) in order to classify oak trees. Yonekawa et al.^[13], from the University of Tokyo, fused several prominent features of plant phenotypes, such as texture, color, and shape for image recognition, and used the backpropagation (BP) neural network algorithm to train and classify image data. In 2006, Cheng et al. ^[14] used fuzzy functions for shape matching and identification of plant phenotypes. CLEF 2011–2015 (Cross Language Evaluation Forum) in the BBS held pictures of plant classification of image recognition under acomplex environment; the library has 1000 kinds of plant species. Villena et al.^[15] utilized scale invariance to extract plant phenotypic traits that can be identified. In 2013, Charles et al. ^[16] established a database of 100 plants containing 16 samples for each plant, carried out feature extraction, and proposed a high-accuracy recognition algorithm under the condition of small training set size, based on the k-nearest neighbor (KNN) algorithm. When the shapes, textures, and edges of the plant phenotypes were fused, an accuracy of 96% was achieved.The research on PPIR started late domestically, but it is worth learning from. In 2007, Wang et al. ^[17]used a moving center hypersphere classifier to classify eight geometric features and seven image invariant moments that were extracted from ginkgo leaves with an accuracy rate of 92%. In 2009, Wang et al.^[18] extracted the feature vectors of maize leaves while using morphology and contour extraction, and then classified them while using the genetic algorithm for optimized selection of the features. Subsequently, Fisher’s discrimination method was used in order to identify the diseased leaves with an accuracy rate of more than 90%. In Reference ^[19], Zhai et al. used the relational matching structure method to match the plant leaves images and different model structures after feature extraction, and identified the types of plants based on the matching level. In 2015, Wang et al.^[20] proposed a plant leaves fusion-based recognition system to extract the development characteristics of a variety of foliage plant phenotypic traits, such as shape, color, texture, leaf margin, etc. Support vector machine (SVM) classification was used for plant identification, and the experimental results showed that an accuracy of 91.41% was achieved while using the SVM, which was better than that with a BP neural network or the KNN algorithm. In spectroscopy, Cen et al.^[21] used hyperspectral imaging technology in combination with supervised classification algorithm for cucumber freezing damage detectio2.2. Traditional PPIR TechniquesThe existing PPIR methods can be mainly divided into three categories^[3], which are described, as follows:(1) the basic idea of relational structure matching method for PPIR is shown in Figure 1^[22]. In this method, first, the input images are preprocessed in order to extract features, while using multi-scale curvature space to describe the geometric features, as well as the fuzzy particle swarm algorithm and genetic algorithm. Second, the algorithm matching rules and parameters are set. Finally, the extracted features are matched with the features from the sample database and images are classified based on the matching degree^[23][24].Figure 1. Flow chart of relational structure matching method.

(2)1. PPIR that is based on mathematical statistics is the mostntroductionPlants are indispensable resources that are present on the earth. They play an important role in the development of the society and they have great significance in environmental protection, medical pharmaceutical, agricultural development, and food-related applications [1]. Howidely used method.ever, any plant-related work, such as plant species and diseases identification and evaluation of Figure 2plant shproductiows its basic idea. First, a mathematical model is set up, followed by quantitative analysis andn, is becoming increasingly complex. An important starting point for any plant-related work is the identification of plant phenotype that refers to the physiological and biochemical characteristics of plants, including their color, shape, texture, and so on, which are determined by both genes and the environment. Traditional methods of plant phenotype identification include artificial identification, phytochemical classification of the image. The methods , the anatomical method, morphological method, and genetic method, which are difficult to implement, have low efficiency, and unstable accuracy [2]. With the developmen this category are based on Bayesian discrimint and popularity of computer technology, image recognition technology is becoming increasingly mature, and it has been successfully applied in many fields, such as face recognition, object detection, medical imaging, etc. [3,4]. Plant phenotype identifunctions, KNN, kernel PCA, Fisher discriminant method, etcication tht is based on image processing technology has become a popular topic of research, leading to new breakthroughs and improved accuracy. ^[25][26][27].FIn partigcure 2. The flow chart of mathematicallar, deep learning has been proposed in order to further promote the development of PPIR [5]. Table 1 shows recentatistics relevant reviews.

2. PPIR mTethods.chnology

(3) Traditional machine learning-based PPIR mainly consists of artificial neural network, moving center hypersphere classifier, SVM, etc.^[28]. Machine learning refers to a set of computerized modeling methods whose patterns are learned from data in order to automatically make decisions without explicit rules. The main idea of machine learning is to make effective use of experience or sample scenarios to discover the underlying structure, similarity, or difference in the data, so as to correctly interpret or classify new experience or sample scenarios^[29]. It is important for programers to deploy specific machine learning approaches to their specific problems to make informed choices. The application of plant phenotype can be summarized into four aspects: (a) identification and detection, (b) classification, (c) quantification and estimation, and (d) prediction. In addition, data preprocessing steps, such as dimensionality reduction, clustering, and segmentation, can also be the key to a successful decision ^[29]. The moving center hypersphere classifier considers the sample points of plant phenotypic image data as a series of hyper spheres. A set of sample points are considered to be part of a hyper sphere, whose radius is expanded to include as many sample points as possible^[26]. The SVM is a supervised learning model that is applicable to linearly or nonlinearly separable and a small number of samples. The method can be extended to high-dimensional pattern recognition by projecting the data points into a higher dimensional space and computing a maximum-margin hyperplane decision surface^[26]. The SVM can be used to classify the plant phenotypic image data.

2.1. State of the Art in PPIR TechnologyThe development of PPIR technology started several decades earlier internationally, focusing on feature extraction and training of plants using traditional methods. In the 1980s and 1990s, Ingrouille et al. [12], from the University of London, extracted 27 main characteristics of plant leaves and used principal components analysis (PCA) in order to classify oak trees. Yonekawa et al. [13], from the University of Tokyo, fused several prominent features of plant phenotypes, such as texture, color, and shape for image recognition, and used the backpropagation (BP) neural network algorithm to train and classify image data. In 2006, Cheng et al. [14] used fuzzy functions for shape matching and identification of plant phenotypes. CLEF 2011–2015 (Cross Language Evaluation Forum) in the BBS held pictures of plant classification of image recognition under acomplex environment; the library has 1000 kinds of plant species. Villena et al. [15] utilized scale invariance to extract plant phenotypic traits that can be identified. In 2013, Charles et al. [16] established a database of 100 plants containing 16 samples for each plant, carried out feature extraction, and proposed a high-accuracy recognition algorithm under the condition of small training set size, based on the k-nearest neighbor (KNN) algorithm. When the shapes, textures, and edges of the plant phenotypes were fused, an accuracy of 96% was achieved.The research on PPIR started late domestically, but it is worth learning from. In 2007, Wang et al. [17] used a moving center hypersphere classifier to classify eight geometric features and seven image invariant moments that were extracted from ginkgo leaves with an accuracy rate of 92%. In 2009, Wang et al. [18] extracted the feature vectors of maize leaves while using morphology and contour extraction, and then classified them while using the genetic algorithm for optimized selection of the features. Subsequently, Fisher’s discrimination method was used in order to identify the diseased leaves with an accuracy rate of more than 90%. In Reference [19], Zhai et al. used the relational matching structure method to match the plant leaves images and different model structures after feature extraction, and identified the types of plants based on the matching level. In 2015, Wang et al. [20] proposed a plant leaves fusion-based recognition system to extract the development characteristics of a variety of foliage plant phenotypic traits, such as shape, color, texture, leaf margin, etc. Support vector machine (SVM) classification was used for plant identification, and the experimental results showed that an accuracy of 91.41% was achieved while using the SVM, which was better than that with a BP neural network or the KNN algorithm. In spectroscopy, Cen et al. [21] used hyperspectral imaging technology in combination with supervised classification algorithm for cucumber freezing damage detectio2.2. Traditional PPIR TechniquesThe existing PPIR methods can be mainly divided into three categories [3], which are described, as follows:(1) the basic idea of relational structure matching method for PPIR is shown in Figure 1 [22]. In this method, first, the input images are preprocessed in order to extract features, while using multi-scale curvature space to describe the geometric features, as well as the fuzzy particle swarm algorithm and genetic algorithm. Second, the algorithm matching rules and parameters are set. Finally, the extracted features are matched with the features from the sample database and images are classified based on the matching degree [23,24].Figure 1. Flow chart of relational structure matching method.(2) PPIR that is based on mathematical statistics is the most widely used method. Figure 2 shows its basic idea. First, a mathematical model is set up, followed by quantitative analysis and classification of the image. The methods in this category are based on Bayesian discriminant functions, KNN, kernel PCA, Fisher discriminant method, etc. [25,26,27].Figure 2. The flow chart of mathematical statistics methods.(3) Traditional machine learning-based PPIR mainly consists of artificial neural network, moving center hypersphere classifier, SVM, etc. [28]. Machine learning refers to a set of computerized modeling methods whose patterns are learned from data in order to automatically make decisions without explicit rules. The main idea of machine learning is to make effective use of experience or sample scenarios to discover the underlying structure, similarity, or difference in the data, so as to correctly interpret or classify new experience or sample scenarios [29]. It is important for programers to deploy specific machine learning approaches to their specific problems to make informed choices. The application of plant phenotype can be summarized into four aspects: (a) identification and detection, (b) classification, (c) quantification and estimation, and (d) prediction. In addition, data preprocessing steps, such as dimensionality reduction, clustering, and segmentation, can also be the key to a successful decision [29]. The moving center hypersphere classifier considers the sample points of plant phenotypic image data as a series of hyper spheres. A set of sample points are considered to be part of a hyper sphere, whose radius is expanded to include as many sample points as possible [26]. The SVM is a supervised learning model that is applicable to linearly or nonlinearly separable and a small number of samples. The method can be extended to high-dimensional pattern recognition by projecting the data points into a higher dimensional space and computing a maximum-margin hyperplane decision surface [26]. The SVM can be used to classify the plant phenotypic image data.

Figure 3 shows its basic idea.Figure 3. Flow chart of support vector machine (SVM).

Feature extraction involving the extraction of shape, texture, color, and other major feature information is an important step in PPIR ^[22]. In shape based feature learning, edge detection and shape context description methods are widely used in order to extract the plant contours from the input images to achieve plant recognition ^[19]. Texture-based feature learning includes internal information of plant phenotypes and, generally, it is based on a local binary pattern (LBP) algorithm that calculates the correlation between a pixel and its surrounding pixels in an object ^[24]. Color based feature learning is more stable and reliable when compared with the aforementioned learning methods. It is robust and not sensitive to the target size and orientation of the color characteristics. It usually uses the percentage of pixels of different colors in red, green, and blue (RGB), or hue, saturation, and brightness (HSV) images, and their histograms for feature extraction and image recognition ^[25]. These feature learning methods focus on the attributes of plant phenotypes and they mostly include shallow learning methods that need manual feature extraction.At present, a variety of imaging technologies are used in order to collect complex traits that are related to growth, yield, and adaptability of biotic or abiotic stresses (such as disease, insects, drought, and salinity). These imaging technologies include visible light imaging (such as machine vision), imaging spectroscopy (such as multispectral and hyperspectral remote sensing), thermal infrared imaging, fluorescence imaging, 3D imaging and tomography (such as positron emission computer tomography), and image and computer tomography). Many institutions and organizations in the world have carried out phenotypic group analysis, such as the Australian plant phenomics facility. At the same time, there are also some high-throughput phenotypic testing platforms that are deployed in the field or indoors, such as LemnaTec. Although phenotype analysis of plants that is based on optical imaging has many advantages, it also faces some difficulties. For example, when machine vision methods are used to process visible light images in order to obtain phenotypic information, such as plant species, fruit quantity, and pest categories, it is difficult to resolve adjacent leaves problems, such as overlap and occlusion that are caused by ears and fruits. Images that were collected in a laboratory environment often have a pure background, uniform lighting, and a small number of plants or organs contained in the image. Solving practical problems in the field is often caused by complex backgrounds, differences in lighting, and occlusion. The interference of object shadows.For PPIR, especially for a large database of plant phenotypic images, the performance of shallow and single feature learning methods is not satisfactory due to the low recognition accuracy and several interference factors ^[26].In

shows its basic idea.Figure 3. Flow chart of support vector machine (SVM).Feature extraction involving the extraction of shape, texture, color, and other major feature information is an important step in PPIR [22]. In shape based feature learning, edge detection and shape context description methods are widely used in order to extract the plant contours from the input images to achieve plant recognition [19]. Texture-based feature learning includes internal information of plant phenotypes and, generally, it is based on a local binary pattern (LBP) algorithm that calculates the correlation between a pixel and its surrounding pixels in an object [24]. Color based feature learning is more stable and reliable when compared with the aforementioned learning methods. It is robust and not sensitive to the target size and orientation of the color characteristics. It usually uses the percentage of pixels of different colors in red, green, and blue (RGB), or hue, saturation, and brightness (HSV) images, and their histograms for feature extraction and image recognition [25]. These feature learning methods focus on the attributes of plant phenotypes and they mostly include shallow learning methods that need manual feature extraction.At present, a variety of imaging technologies are used in order to collect complex traits that are related to growth, yield, and adaptability of biotic or abiotic stresses (such as disease, insects, drought, and salinity). These imaging technologies include visible light imaging (such as machine vision), imaging spectroscopy (such as multispectral and hyperspectral remote sensing), thermal infrared imaging, fluorescence imaging, 3D imaging and tomography (such as positron emission computer tomography), and image and computer tomography). Many institutions and organizations in the world have carried out phenotypic group analysis, such as the Australian plant phenomics facility. At the same time, there are also some high-throughput phenotypic testing platforms that are deployed in the field or indoors, such as LemnaTec. Although phenotype analysis of plants that is based on optical imaging has many advantages, it also faces some difficulties. For example, when machine vision methods are used to process visible light images in order to obtain phenotypic information, such as plant species, fruit quantity, and pest categories, it is difficult to resolve adjacent leaves problems, such as overlap and occlusion that are caused by ears and fruits. Images that were collected in a laboratory environment often have a pure background, uniform lighting, and a small number of plants or organs contained in the image. Solving practical problems in the field is often caused by complex backgrounds, differences in lighting, and occlusion. The interference of object shadows.For PPIR, especially for a large database of plant phenotypic images, the performance of shallow and single feature learning methods is not satisfactory due to the low recognition accuracy and several interference factors [26].In

Table 1, the advantages and disadvantages of traditional methods that are used for plant phenotypes image recognition are compared.Table 1. Comparison of traditional plant phenotype recognition techniques.