Management of Fluid Overload in Acute Settings: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 1 by Samuel Huang and Version 3 by Catherine Yang.

This papentryr provides a comprehensive review of fluid overload management, specifically targeting therapeutic strategies for patients with diuretic resistance or refractory volume overload. It covers the pathophysiology of edema formation and the challenges associated with fluid removal in patients with chronic conditions such as congestive heart failure, cirrhosis, and chronic kidney disease. Key treatments discussed include combination therapy with loop and thiazide diuretics, use of alternative loop diuretics with higher bioavailability, and the comparative effectiveness of bolus versus continuous drip loop diuretics. For patients unresponsive to pharmacologic management, the entrypaper also examines mechanical ultrafiltration methods, comparing hemodialysis (HD), continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH), and specialized CHF solutions (Aquamid). The entryreview emphasizes evidence-based approaches, highlighting studies that support optimized fluid management to improve patient outcomes and reduce hospital readmissions.

  • fluid overload
  • oedema
  • cirrhosis
  • congestive heart failure
  • end stage renal disease
  • Cirrhosis
  • Congestive Heart Failure
  • End Stage Renal Disease

1. Algorithm for Management of Fluid Overload in Acute Settings

Algorithm for Management of Fluid Overload in Acute Settings

Step 1: Initial Assessment

  1. Clinical Evaluation:
    • Assess for signs of fluid overload: peripheral edema, pulmonary edema (crackles on lung exam), ascites, or JVD.
    • Check baseline weight, blood pressure, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation.
  2. Laboratory Tests:
    • Review serum creatinine, electrolytes, and daily weights.
    • Assess for hypoalbuminemia or renal impairment which may complicate fluid overload management.

Step 2: Dietary and Fluid Modifications

  1. Restrict Fluid and Sodium:
    • Fluid restriction: Limit intake to 1-1.5 L/day if appropriate.
    • Sodium restriction: Reduce dietary sodium to <2 g/day.

Step 3: Pharmacologic Diuresis Initiation

  1. Initiate Loop Diuretic (Furosemide, Torsemide, Bumetanide):
    • Start with furosemide 40 mg IV and increase based on response.
    • For patients previously on diuretics, start at double the outpatient dose.
  2. Monitor Response:
    • Check urine output and aim for a target weight reduction of 1-2 lbs/day.
    • Adjust dose based on urine output and weight loss.

Step 4: Diuretic Escalation (If Insufficient Response)

  1. Sequential Nephron Blockade:
    • Add Thiazide Diuretic (e.g., Metolazone) to loop diuretic regimen for synergistic effect.
  2. Switch to a More Potent Loop Diuretic:
    • Torsemide or Bumetanide may be more effective in cases of gut wall edema due to better oral bioavailability.

Step 5: Route of Administration and Monitoring

  1. Switch to IV Bolus or Continuous Infusion:
    • In cases with inadequate oral diuretic response, use IV bolus or continuous IV infusion (no clear superiority per MGH data).
  2. Close Monitoring:
    • Track serum creatinine and electrolytes daily.
    • Monitor for adverse effects, such as worsening renal function or electrolyte imbalances.

Step 6: Consider Mechanical Fluid Removal

  1. Ultrafiltration (Aquamid, Hemodialysis):
    • Indicated for patients with refractory fluid overload unresponsive to pharmacologic therapy.
    • Discuss with nephrology for implementation in cases of severe fluid overload with oliguria or anuria.

2. Summary of Decision Points

Summary of Decision Points

  • Escalate loop diuretic dose if urine output <500 mL/day.
  • Add Thiazide diuretic if fluid overload persists with loop diuretic alone.
  • Transition to IV or consider alternate loop diuretic in cases with compromised absorption (e.g., gut wall edema).
  • Consult Nephrology for ultrafiltration in severe or refractory cases. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]

3. Management of Fluid Overload: Evidence-Based Outline with Key Studies

 

 

Management of Fluid Overload: Evidence-Based Outline with Key Studies

Magnitude of Problem with Fluid Overload

  • Prevalence: Fluid overload is a common complication in chronic conditions like CHF, cirrhosis, and chronic kidney disease (CKD).
    • Study Findings: CHF affects over 5.1 million people in the U.S., with fluid overload contributing to morbidity and mortality due to recurrent hospitalizations.
    • Mortality Risk: Studies indicate increased mortality in patients requiring high-dose loop diuretics for fluid control, highlighting the need for effective management strategies.

Pathophysiology of Edema Formation

  • Starling Forces: Imbalance in hydrostatic and oncotic pressures drives edema formation.
    • Increased hydrostatic pressure (e.g., CHF) or decreased oncotic pressure (e.g., nephrotic syndrome) promotes fluid shift into the interstitial space.
  • Loop Diuretic Delivery Challenges:
    • Decreased cardiac output or low serum albumin impairs diuretic efficacy by reducing delivery to the renal tubules, making diuretic-resistant fluid overload more common in advanced disease.

4. Treatment Strategies

Treatment Strategies

Combination Loop and Thiazide Diuretics

  • Sequential Nephron Blockade: Combining loop and thiazide diuretics helps overcome resistance by blocking sodium reabsorption at different nephron sites.
    • Study Evidence: In CHF and cirrhosis, combined diuretic therapy increases sodium excretion and weight loss significantly.
    • Key Data: A 3-fold increase in urinary sodium with metolazone added to loop diuretics, resulting in improved diuresis.
    • Distal Tubule Adaptations: Prolonged loop diuretic use may lead to hypertrophy of distal tubules, increasing sodium reabsorption, which thiazide diuretics help counteract.

Use of Alternative Loop Diuretics

  • TorsSequemide and Bumetanintial Nephron Blockade: These alterCombinativeing loop diand thiazide diuretics have higher oral bioavailability and consistent elps overcome resistance by blocking sodium reabsorption compared to furosemide, making them effective in cases of gut edemaat different nephron sites.
    • Study ReEviewdence: In CHF, and torsemide was associated with fewer hospitalizations and comparable or better diuresis than furosemidecirrhosis, combined diuretic therapy increases sodium excretion and weight loss significantly.
    • Ascend-HF TrialKey Data: PrA 3-fopensity-matched analysis suggested no mortality difference but found a reduction in CHF-related readmissions with torsemide use over furosemideld increase in urinary sodium with metolazone added to loop diuretics, resulting in improved diuresis.
    • Distal Tubule Adaptations: Prolonged loop diuretic use may lead to hypertrophy of distal tubules, increasing sodium reabsorption, which thiazide diuretics help counteract.

BUse olus versus Continuous Drip f Alternative Loop Diuretics

  • DTose Trialrsemide and Bumetanide: CompThese ared intermittent IV bolus with continuous infusion, finding no significant difference in fluid loss or renal outcomeslternative loop diuretics have higher oral bioavailability and consistent absorption compared to furosemide, making them effective in cases of gut edema.
    • PrimarStudy OutcomesReview: In CHF, No difference in symptom improvement or serum creatinine at 72 hours between bolus and drip dosingtorsemide was associated with fewer hospitalizations and comparable or better diuresis than furosemide.
    • CliAscenical Impd-HF Trialication: BProth methods are viable, with choice tailored to patient prepensity-matched analysis suggested no mortality difference or hospital protocol, as both show similar efficacy in diuresis but found a reduction in CHF-related readmissions with torsemide use over furosemide.

MBolus vechanical Ultrafiltrationrsus Continuous Drip Loop Diuretics

  • UltrafiltratiDon Indicationsse Trial: Compared insidered when diuretics are ineffective or cause worseningtermittent IV bolus with continuous infusion, finding no significant difference in fluid loss or renal functionoutcomes.
    • UNLPrimary OAD Studyutcomes: No Demonstrated that ultrafiltration led to more effective fluid removal and greater weight loss than diuretics alone, without impacting renal function adverselydifference in symptom improvement or serum creatinine at 72 hours between bolus and drip dosing.
    • CARRESS-HF TrialClinical Implication: FBoth methound no significant benefit in renal function or mortality but highlighted ultrafiltration as an option for those withds are viable, with choice tailored to patient preference or hospital protocol, as both show similar efficacy in diuretic resistancesis.

Clinical Summary: Ultrafiltration is a valuable tool for volume overload resistant to diuretics, especially in ICU settings where strict volume control is necessary

Mechanical Ultrafiltration

FeatureHemodialysis (HD)CVVHCHF Solutions (Aquamid)
ClearanceYes
    • : Found no significant benefit in renal function or mortality but highlighted ultrafiltration as an option for those with diuretic resistance.
Yes
No
    • Clinical Summary
    • : Ultrafiltration is a valuable tool for volume overload resistant to diuretics, especially in ICU settings where strict volume control is necessary
    • FeatureHemodialysis (HD)CVVHCHF Solutions (Aquamid)
      ClearanceYesYesNo
      Ultrafiltration (UF)YesYesYes
      Treatment DurationIntermittentContinuousContinuous
      Frequency of TreatmentUsually 3 times a weekDailyDaily
      Fluid Removal Prescription1–2 L per session (285–570 mL/hr); 0–1 L in hypotensive patients50–100 mL/hr (titrate higher if tolerated)50–100 mL/hr (titrate higher if tolerated)
      Total UF per Day0–1 L (hypotensive patients)1.2–2.4 L (or more at higher rates)1.2–2.4 L (or more at higher rates)
      Total UF per Week0–3 L8.4–16.6 L8.4–16.6 L
      Blood Flow Rate300–400 mL/min150 mL/min40 mL/min

      Fluid Overload Management: Test Your Knowledge

      1. What chronic conditions increase the risk of fluid overload?

        • Chronic heart failure (CHF), chronic kidney disease (CKD), cirrhosis, and nephrotic syndrome are common conditions that increase fluid overload risk.

      2. What is the primary mechanism of edema formation in fluid overload?

        • Edema primarily results from an imbalance in Starling forces, where increased hydrostatic pressure or decreased oncotic pressure leads to fluid leaking into the interstitial space.

      3. How does low serum albumin contribute to fluid overload?

        • Low serum albumin decreases oncotic pressure, causing fluid to shift from the intravascular to interstitial spaces, which can exacerbate edema.

      4. What is the primary site of action for loop diuretics?

        • Loop diuretics act on the sodium-potassium-2-chloride (Na+/K+/2Cl-) transporter in the thick ascending loop of Henle in the nephron.

      5. Why are loop diuretics often ineffective in patients with low cardiac output?

        • Low cardiac output reduces blood flow to the kidneys, limiting the delivery of loop diuretics to their target site.

      6. What is the purpose of using combination diuretic therapy with loop and thiazide diuretics?

        • Combining loop and thiazide diuretics, known as sequential nephron blockade, increases diuresis by blocking sodium reabsorption at different sites in the nephron.

      7. Which thiazide diuretic is commonly added to loop diuretics for better diuresis?

        • Metolazone is often used with loop diuretics due to its effectiveness in enhancing diuresis.

      8. What is the role of distal tubular hypertrophy in diuretic resistance?

        • Prolonged loop diuretic use can cause distal tubular hypertrophy, which increases sodium reabsorption and contributes to diuretic resistance.

      9. Which two alternative loop diuretics are recommended for cases with gut wall edema?

        • Torsemide and bumetanide, due to their higher bioavailability, are recommended for cases with gut wall edema.

      10. What are the bioavailability percentages for torsemide, bumetanide, and furosemide?

        • Torsemide and bumetanide have approximately 80-100% bioavailability, while furosemide ranges from 10-100%.

      11. What are the findings of the ASCEND-HF trial comparing furosemide and torsemide?

        • ASCEND-HF suggested no significant mortality difference but showed reduced CHF-related readmissions with torsemide over furosemide.

      12. What dosing method was found to be equivalent in efficacy in the Dose Optimization Strategies Evaluation (DOSE) trial?

        • The DOSE trial found no significant difference in efficacy between bolus and continuous drip loop diuretic administration.

      13. What are the primary advantages of continuous diuretic infusion?

        • Continuous infusion may provide more stable drug levels, reducing fluctuations in diuretic effects and minimizing electrolyte disturbances.

      14. What is mechanical ultrafiltration, and when is it indicated?

        • Mechanical ultrafiltration is a non-pharmacologic fluid removal technique used in cases where diuretics are ineffective or contraindicated.

      15. Which study showed more effective fluid removal with ultrafiltration compared to diuretics alone?

        • The UNLOAD study demonstrated that ultrafiltration was more effective for fluid removal and weight loss than diuretics alone.

      16. What was the primary outcome of the CARRESS-HF trial regarding ultrafiltration?

        • CARRESS-HF found no significant improvement in renal function or mortality with ultrafiltration compared to standard diuretic therapy.

      17. What are the three primary methods of mechanical ultrafiltration?

        • Hemodialysis (HD), continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH), and specialized CHF solutions (Aquamid) are the main ultrafiltration methods.

      18. What fluid removal rates are typical in CVVH and Aquamid ultrafiltration?

        • CVVH and Aquamid can start at 50-100 mL/hr, with the potential to increase to 200-400 mL/hr as tolerated.

      19. Why might torsemide be preferred over furosemide in patients with gut edema?

        • Torsemide’s higher bioavailability allows more consistent absorption in the presence of gut wall edema.

      20. How does the frequency of fluid removal differ between HD, CVVH, and Aquamid?

        • HD is usually performed 3 times a week, while CVVH and Aquamid can be done continuously or daily.

      21. What blood flow rate is typical in HD compared to CVVH and Aquamid?

        • HD typically uses a blood flow rate of 300-400 mL/min, while CVVH uses 150 mL/min and Aquamid uses around 40 mL/min.

      22. How does a sequential nephron blockade enhance diuresis in resistant cases?

        • By combining loop and thiazide diuretics, sequential nephron blockade enhances sodium excretion by blocking reabsorption at multiple nephron sites.

      23. What is the effect of distal tubular hypertrophy on diuretic efficacy?

        • Hypertrophy leads to increased sodium reabsorption, reducing the efficacy of loop diuretics over time.

      24. What is a key advantage of continuous ultrafiltration in hypotensive patients?

        • Continuous ultrafiltration, especially CVVH and Aquamid, can provide gentle, steady fluid removal, which is better tolerated in hypotensive patients.

      25. How is blood pressure impacted by aggressive diuresis in patients with fluid overload?

        • Aggressive diuresis can lower intravascular volume, potentially causing hypotension and decreased renal perfusion.

      26. Why are serial weights important in monitoring fluid overload therapy?

        • Serial weights help assess fluid balance and the effectiveness of diuresis.

      27. How often should serum creatinine and electrolytes be monitored in patients on diuretics for fluid overload?

        • Serum creatinine and electrolytes should be monitored daily to detect renal function changes or electrolyte imbalances.

      28. In which patients would adding metolazone to a loop diuretic be particularly beneficial?

        • Adding metolazone is beneficial for patients with resistant edema and those showing signs of loop diuretic resistance.

      29. Why is hemodialysis less ideal for hypotensive patients with fluid overload?

        • Hemodialysis requires higher blood flow rates, which can be challenging to maintain in hypotensive patients and may lead to hemodynamic instability.

      30. What is the main goal of fluid overload management in patients with chronic kidney disease?

        • The goal is to optimize fluid balance while preserving kidney function, aiming for a gradual fluid removal of 1-2 pounds per day to prevent acute kidney injury (AKI).
Ultrafiltration (UF)
YesYesYes
Treatment DurationIntermittentContinuousContinuous
Frequency of TreatmentUsually 3 times a weekDailyDaily
Fluid Removal Prescription1–2 L per session (285–570 mL/hr); 0–1 L in hypotensive patients50–100 mL/hr (titrate higher if tolerated)50–100 mL/hr (titrate higher if tolerated)
Total UF per Day0–1 L (hypotensive patients)1.2–2.4 L (or more at higher rates)1.2–2.4 L (or more at higher rates)
Total UF per Week0–3 L8.4–16.6 L8.4–16.6 L
Blood Flow Rate300–400 mL/min150 mL/min40 mL/min

5. Fluid Overload Management

  • Ultrafiltration Indications: Considered when diuretics are ineffective or cause worsening renal function.
    • UNLOAD Study: Demonstrated that ultrafiltration led to more effective fluid removal and greater weight loss than diuretics alone, without impacting renal function adversely.
    • CARRESS-HF Trial

1. What chronic conditions increase the risk of fluid overload?

Chronic heart failure (CHF), chronic kidney disease (CKD), cirrhosis, and nephrotic syndrome are common conditions that increase fluid overload risk.

2. What is the primary mechanism of edema formation in fluid overload?

Edema primarily results from an imbalance in Starling forces, where increased hydrostatic pressure or decreased oncotic pressure leads to fluid leaking into the interstitial space.

3. How does low serum albumin contribute to fluid overload?

Low serum albumin decreases oncotic pressure, causing fluid to shift from the intravascular to interstitial spaces, which can exacerbate edema.

4. What is the primary site of action for loop diuretics?

Loop diuretics act on the sodium-potassium-2-chloride (Na+/K+/2Cl-) transporter in the thick ascending loop of Henle in the nephron.

5. Why are loop diuretics often ineffective in patients with low cardiac output?

Low cardiac output reduces blood flow to the kidneys, limiting the delivery of loop diuretics to their target site.

6. What is the purpose of using combination diuretic therapy with loop and thiazide diuretics?

Combining loop and thiazide diuretics, known as sequential nephron blockade, increases diuresis by blocking sodium reabsorption at different sites in the nephron.

7. Which thiazide diuretic is commonly added to loop diuretics for better diuresis?

Metolazone is often used with loop diuretics due to its effectiveness in enhancing diuresis.

8. What is the role of distal tubular hypertrophy in diuretic resistance?

Prolonged loop diuretic use can cause distal tubular hypertrophy, which increases sodium reabsorption and contributes to diuretic resistance.

9. Which two alternative loop diuretics are recommended for cases with gut wall edema?

Torsemide and bumetanide, due to their higher bioavailability, are recommended for cases with gut wall edema.

10. What are the bioavailability percentages for torsemide, bumetanide, and furosemide?

Torsemide and bumetanide have approximately 80-100% bioavailability, while furosemide ranges from 10-100%.

11. What are the findings of the ASCEND-HF trial comparing furosemide and torsemide?

ASCEND-HF suggested no significant mortality difference but showed reduced CHF-related readmissions with torsemide over furosemide.

12. What dosing method was found to be equivalent in efficacy in the Dose Optimization Strategies Evaluation (DOSE) trial?

The DOSE trial found no significant difference in efficacy between bolus and continuous drip loop diuretic administration.

13. What are the primary advantages of continuous diuretic infusion?

Continuous infusion may provide more stable drug levels, reducing fluctuations in diuretic effects and minimizing electrolyte disturbances.

14. What is mechanical ultrafiltration, and when is it indicated?

Mechanical ultrafiltration is a non-pharmacologic fluid removal technique used in cases where diuretics are ineffective or contraindicated.

15. Which study showed more effective fluid removal with ultrafiltration compared to diuretics alone?

The UNLOAD study demonstrated that ultrafiltration was more effective for fluid removal and weight loss than diuretics alone.

16. What was the primary outcome of the CARRESS-HF trial regarding ultrafiltration?

CARRESS-HF found no significant improvement in renal function or mortality with ultrafiltration compared to standard diuretic therapy.

17. What are the three primary methods of mechanical ultrafiltration?

Hemodialysis (HD), coferentinuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH), and specialized CHF esolutions (Aquamid) are the main ultrafiltration methods.

18. What fluid removal rates are typical in CVVH and Aquamid ultrafiltration?

CVVH and Aquamid can start at 50-100 mL/hr, with the potential to increase to 200-400 mL/hr as tolerated.

19. Why might torsemide be preferred over furosemide in patients with gut edema?

Torsemide’s higher bioavailability allows more consistent absorption in the presence of gut wall edema.

20. How does the frequency of fluid removal differ between HD, CVVH, and Aquamid?

HD is usually performed 3 times a week, while CVVH and Aquamid can be done continuously or daily.

21. What blood flow rate is typical in HD compared to CVVH and Aquamid?

HD typically uses a blood flow rate of 300-400 mL/min, while CVVH uses 150 mL/min and Aquamid uses around 40 mL/min.

22. How does a sequential nephron blockade enhance diuresis in resistant cases?

By combining loop and thiazide diuretics, sequential nephron blockade enhances sodium excretion by blocking reabsorption at multiple nephron sites.

23. What is the effect of distal tubular hypertrophy on diuretic efficacy?

Hypertrophy leads to increased sodium reabsorption, reducing the efficacy of loop diuretics over time.

24. What is a key advantage of continuous ultrafiltration in hypotensive patients?

Continuous ultrafiltration, especially CVVH and Aquamid, can provide gentle, steady fluid removal, which is better tolerated in hypotensive patients.

25. How is blood pressure impacted by aggressive diuresis in patients with fluid overload?

Aggressive diuresis can lower intravascular volume, potentially causing hypotension and decreased renal perfusion.

26. Why are serial weights important in monitoring fluid overload therapy?

Serial weights help assess fluid balance and the effectiveness of diuresis.

27. How often should serum creatinine and electrolytes be monitored in patients on diuretics for fluid overload?

Serum creatinine and electrolytes should be monitored daily to detect renal function changes or electrolyte imbalances.

28. In which patients would adding metolazone to a loop diuretic be particularly beneficial?

Adding metolazone is beneficial for patients with resistant edema and those showing signs of loop diuretic resistance.

29. Why is hemodialysis less ideal for hypotensive patients with fluid overload?

Hemodialysis requires higher blood flow rates, which can be challenging to maintain in hypotensive patients and may lead to hemodynamic instability.

30. What is the main goal of fluid overload management in patients with chronic kidney disease?

The goal is to optimize fluid balance while preserving kidney function, aiming for a gradual fluid removal of 1-2 pounds per day to prevent acute kidney injury (AKI).

  1. Ernst ME, Moser M. Use of diuretics in patients with hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(22):2153-64.
  2. Abraham B, Megaly M, Sous M, Fransawyalkomos M, Saad M, Fraser R, et al. Meta-Analysis Comparing Torsemide Versus Furosemide in Patients With Heart Failure. Am J Cardiol. 2020;125(1):92-9.
  3. Bart BA, Goldsmith SR, Lee KL, Givertz MM, O'Connor CM, Bull DA, et al. Ultrafiltration in decompensated heart failure with cardiorenal syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(24):2296-304.
  4. Costanzo MR, Negoianu D, Jaski BE, Bart BA, Heywood JT, Anand IS, et al. Aquapheresis Versus Intravenous Diuretics and Hospitalizations for Heart Failure. JACC Heart Fail. 2016;4(2):95-105.
  5. DiNicolantonio JJ. Should torsemide be the loop diuretic of choice in systolic heart failure? Future Cardiol. 2012;8(5):707-28.
  6. Ellison DH. Diuretic therapy and resistance in congestive heart failure. Cardiology. 2001;96(3-4):132-43.
  7. Eshaghian S, Horwich TB, Fonarow GC. Relation of loop diuretic dose to mortality in advanced heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97(12):1759-64.
  8. Felker GM, Lee KL, Bull DA, Redfield MM, Stevenson LW, Goldsmith SR, et al. Diuretic strategies in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(9):797-805.
  9. Knauf H, Mutschler E. Sequential nephron blockade breaks resistance to diuretics in edematous states. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1997;29(3):367-72.
  10. Kwong JS, Yu CM. Ultrafiltration for acute decompensated heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Cardiol. 2014;172(2):395-402.
  11. Sandek A, Bauditz J, Swidsinski A, Buhner S, Weber-Eibel J, von Haehling S, et al. Altered intestinal function in patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50(16):1561-9.
  12. Sica DA, Gehr TW. Diuretic combinations in refractory oedema states: pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1996;30(3):229-49.
  13. Subramanya AR, Ellison DH. Distal convoluted tubule. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9(12):2147-63.
  14. Trullas JC, Morales-Rull JL, Casado J, Carrera-Izquierdo M, Sanchez-Marteles M, Conde-Martel A, et al. Combining loop with thiazide diuretics for decompensated heart failure: the CLOROTIC trial. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(5):411-21.
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback