Climate Change and Quercus alba Biology: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Peter Tang and Version 1 by Carlson John.

Quercus alba L., also known as white oak, eastern white oak, or American white oak, is a quintessential North American species within the white oak section (Quercus) of the genus Quercus, subgenus Quercus. This species plays a vital role in local and regional economies and as a keystone species in eastern North American forests. As a long-lived woody perennial covering an extensive natural range, Q. alba’s biology is shaped by a myriad of adaptations accumulated throughout its natural history. Populations of Q. alba are crucial repositories of genetic, genomic, and evolutionary insights, capturing the essence of successful historical adaptations and ongoing responses to contemporary environmental challenges in the Anthropocene. This intersection offers an exceptional opportunity to integrate genomic knowledge with the discovery of climate-relevant traits, advancing tree improvement, forest ecology, and forest management strategies. 

  • Quercus alba
  • adaptations
  • environmental stress
  • Anthropocene
  • woody perennial
  • climate-relevant traits
  • research resources

1. Introduction

Oaks (Quercus spp.), as long-lived deciduous trees, are central to the biology of our planet, both as individual species and as members of complex ecosystems. Oaks underpin many regional and local economies worldwide and have been of great cultural significance for eons. Collectively, oak species contribute, either directly or indirectly, to human nutrition, medicines, energy, paper, construction materials, and ornamental landscape applications, and are socially and culturally significant, even in our advanced technology era [1]. Oaks are often dominant species within natural ecosystems, store significant amounts of sequestered carbon, provide ecosystem services such as water purification and oxygen production, and serve as keystone species that anchor complex multi-trophic communities [2]. These attributes derive in large part from the life history strategy of trees as long-living woody perennial plants, with the ability to adapt acutely and chronically to ever-changing environmental conditions [3,4][3][4]. Critically, the genomic evidence reveals that oaks have so far exhibited rapid adaptation to the changing climate of the Anthropocene [5], a chapter in history that is only just beginning.

1.1. Quercus alba L.

Quercus alba is the archetypic representative of the Quercus (‘white oak’) section of the oak genus Quercus (for phenotypic identifiers see Figure 1A), one of eight genera in the Fagaceae (beech) family. In eastern North America, one of the most important tree species to communities, regional economies, and industries, as well as being a keystone species of natural forest ecosystems [2]. The species accounts for the largest volume of oak lumber harvested from US forests, for use in flooring, furniture, construction, and the production of millions of barrels every year for the wine and spirits industry [6,7][6][7]. Quercus alba acorns serve as an important dietary component for many wild animal species, of prime importance after extirpation of the American chestnut (Castanea dentata).
Figure 1. Q. alba, its range, and examples of healthy and disease/pest conditions. (A) Q. alba identifiers—bark, leaves, acorns; (B) Historical natural range of Q. alba; (C) Current Forest Inventory and Analysis; (D) Projected future habitat under harsh climate scenario; (E) Very old, healthy pasture tree; (F) Healthy seed orchard tree, Murphy NC; (G) White oak forest stand; (H) Natural regeneration; (I) Phytophthora root and crown rot; (J) Tree with oak wilt from Bretziella fagacearum; (K) Tree with oak decline; (L) Hypoxylon cankers; (M) Anthracnose (Discula quercina); (N) Botryosphaeria cankers; (O) Lymantia dispar (gypsy moth); (P) Acorn and nut weevils (Genus Curculio); (Q) Roots of 25-year-old oak tree showing taproot; (R) Masting Q. alba tree, Garrett County, MD, 2022; (S) Catkin on flowering Q. alba graft in the greenhouse; (T) Close-up of healthy branch with mature acorns; (U) Weevil exiting germinating acorn (long, healthy taproot, but the shoot is damaged and will not emerge); (V) Germinating acorns. Credits: (A) Laura DeWald; (B) The United States Geological Survey; (C,D) USDA Forest Service https://www.fs.usda.gov/nrs/atlas/tree/802 (accessed on 30 November 2023); (E) John Carlson; (F–H) Laura DeWald; (I,K) Joseph OBrien, USDA Forest Service, https://www.bugwood.org/; (J) Fred Baker, Utah State University, https://www.bugwood.org/; (L) Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources—Forestry, https://www.bugwood.org/; (M,N) Bruce Watt, University of Maine, https://www.bugwood.org/; (O) John Ghent_Bugwood.org; (P) Louisiana State University, https://www.bugwood.org/; (Q) USDA Forest Service https://www.fs.usda.gov/; (R) William Buckel; (S–V) Laura DeWald.
Quercus alba has historically been a dominant canopy species in the central and eastern hardwood forests of North America from pre-European settlement times, providing important ecosystem services including habitat for a wide diversity of organisms, sequestering carbon, and filtering air and water [8,9,10,11,12,13][8][9][10][11][12][13] (Figure 1B). With the changing land-use patterns, Q. alba recruitment (growth into the forest canopy) declined during the 20th century with a concomitant decrease in white oak presence in North American forests (Figure 1C). Contrastingly, other oaks prospered during this period, leading to several important questions whose answers are critical to forecasting the future of the species, especially in rapidly changing climate scenarios. As posed by Abrams (2003 [8]), “Why did white oak, among all the upland oaks, dominate in the presettlement forest? What restricted the development of red oak in the presettlement forest on sites that it currently dominates? What role did anthropogenic factors play in the expansion of red oak and chestnut oak versus white oak? What ecophysiological limitations make white oak more susceptible than other oaks to the dramatic changes in land use over the past few hundred years?” Key to answering these questions is understanding the oak trait biology associated with competitive success in environmental niche adaptations. Thus, in Q. alba and other sympatric forest tree species, a more systematic, integrative understanding is needed; this would ideally encompass root/mycorrhizal biology, root/stem/leaf water transport, and vascular dynamics, as well as the physiological and genetic control of these traits and phenology, masting, and seedling regeneration in normal and abiotic/biotic stress conditions. Predicting the future competitive success of Q. alba in a rapidly changing climate (Figure 1D) will rely on understanding the degree of the plasticity of these traits and the reproductive, recruitment, and evolutionary constraints on long-lived perennial species.

1.2. Challenges for Oaks in the Anthropocene

Due to the continued rapid warming of the Earth during the Anthropocene, climate change is and will continue to impact the sustainability of global forest tree resources, both directly and indirectly [5]. Given sufficient time as regional climate conditions change, species may adapt to changing environments. However, rapid environmental changes pose major challenges to perennial species with very long generation times. This is particularly true for trees which can have long juvenility periods and cycles of flowering, seed production, and seed germination that are dependent on specific environmental conditions. Since adaptation relies on reproduction, the continued survival of long-lived species in their current locations is particularly uncertain. Indeed, direct impacts of recent global warming on tree reproduction are being reported in both fruit orchard and forest trees [14[14][15][16][17][18][19],15,16,17,18,19], and research is needed to understand the impact on perennials as climate change advances.
Considering the importance of oaks to ecosystems and the human endeavor, it is surprising how fragmented our climate-relevant knowledge of the biology of oak species is in comparison to that of economically important herbaceous species [20]. This is, in part, the result of long-lived perennial trees having been considered difficult models for the study of basic cellular, physiological, or genetic processes. Multiple reasons for this are apparent, but, particularly, the long sexual generation times and difficult asexual propagation methods are considered most inhibitory for basic research. This contrasts with annual crops and model plants where generation cycles can be months, not decades, providing well-controlled genetic materials for study. However, the realities of climate change, an ever-increasing population needing shelter and energy, and our emerging understanding of the crucial role that oak trees play in our environment have become compelling forces for important oak biology research across all levels, from cellular and whole-plant physiology, genetics, and genomics to forest ecology and species conservation. Rapidly advancing molecular technologies and large-scale, big data-driven approaches have generated powerful model systems for trees [21,22,23,24][21][22][23][24]. The study of oak biology provides new opportunities to delve deeper into the key features that define woody perennial plants and are shared among oaks and other hardwood forest trees [25].

2. Climate Change and Quercus alba Biology: Direct Impacts

As sessile organisms, temperate trees have developmental and reproductive systems that are optimized for the annual cycle of changing environmental conditions. From studies of different plant species, these systems are sensitive to light/dark cycling, day/night temperatures, water availability, or a combination of the three. For a tree species in a particular climate zone, there are several key physiological systems adapted to the cyclic changing environmental conditions. These include but are not limited to: (1) tree water maintenance and transport systems; (2) juvenility and reproductive systems; (3) meristematic growth and development systems; and (4) abiotic and biotic cellular stress response systems. All these systems are composed of phenotypic traits that are critical for maintaining the species in its current environment. For Q. alba, as discussed above, of great interest are traits that maintain regeneration (flowering, pollination, seed development, and seedling survival and growth), enhance recruitment (drought and shade tolerance and sapling survival and growth) (Figure 1H), and tolerate or resist biotic (pathogens and pests) (Figure 1I–P) and abiotic stress. Adaptation can be a long-term process depending on the phenotypic plasticity and genetic basis for any trait, especially for species with long generation times. Therefore, rapid climate change poses a significant threat to the continued presence of such species in their current environment. To predict the future success and distribution of oaks in the changing temperate forest zones with the objective of potentially assisting its future success, we must know: (1) Which adaptive traits were key to the oaks’ success in their extant locations? (2) What is the degree and mechanism of phenotypic plasticity and/or genetic variation for these traits required by individuals or populations for adaptation? (3) What genes or molecular networks control the climate critical traits? (4) Which of these traits should be prioritized as targets for oak management, reforestation, and genetic improvement efforts in the future? The following are examples of oak traits likely to be important in their adaptive responses to rapid climate change.

2.1. Water Relations: Control of Root Growth in Oaks

Predicting the future success and distribution of Q. alba in North America relies heavily on our understanding of the physiology and genetics underlying this species’ ability to adapt to the direct impacts of increased environmental warming. Although we have very limited knowledge of this in Q. alba, significant studies of drought tolerance and related traits, such as water-use efficiency in other models for annual and woody plant species [67[26][27][28],68,69], have provided research targets and foundational studies for deployment in the research on Q. alba. From the genetic perspective, several studies have revealed the sources of variation and candidate genes underlying drought tolerance and adaptation in European white oaks [70,71,72,73,74][29][30][31][32][33]. Unlike four other northeastern oaks studied by Reed and Kaye [75][34], Q. alba is responsive to rich soil composition and higher moisture levels, associated shale vs. sand bedrock. However, data and publications on the performance of Q. alba on different types of soil are scarce (for more information on site recommendations for Q. alba, refer to [76][35]). As Q. alba have a taproot architecture (Figure 1Q), presumably to enable deep soil water acquisition under drought conditions, studies focusing on the control of the development of this root form in woody plant species are particularly relevant. Oaks exhibit both shallow and deep rooting systems, allowing them to access water at multiple depths in the soil profile during the annual cycles of rain and drought. They successfully compete with species possessing rooting systems more specialized for deep soil (e.g., maples and pines) [36]. The rooting architecture of oaks in concert with stem vascular organization (ring porous) and leaf structural features (thickness, stomatal size) enable oaks to exploit niches across regional and climatic zones greatly differing in hydrologic conditions [36[36][37],37], from mesic to xeric. Equally important, oaks survive and prosper in a broad range of different edaphic conditions and drought stress, due to the structural features of oak vascular tissues such as tyloses (vascular structures arising post-differentiation that limit the diffusion of liquids through the wood sample [77][38], deep rooting, and the ability to form and sustain mycorrhizal associations with a high diversity of fungi; for review, see [78][39]). Quercus species distributions provide excellent examples of how these anatomical traits and their associated physiological systems have enabled the species to become dominant in North American forests across a large range of environments (for a review of physiological characteristics, see [32,36,37,40,79][36][37][40][41][42]). A recent review by Kościelniak et al. [80][43] lays out the current status of our understanding of taproot development and its control while highlighting several questions that need future study: “(1) how does organization and cellular signaling enable a taproot to grow and penetrate deep soil layers, (2) what internal factors enable taproots to grow rapidly and penetrate deep soil layers (Figure 1Q), and (3) how does soil water limitation induce the vertical growth of taproots (Figure 1Q). Aside from the unanswered questions above, how much does the genetic control of cell division explain the continued maintenance of root growth and apical dominance of taproot meristems?” As outlined by Kościelniak et al. [80][43], emerging concepts in the control of root growth come from studies of models such as Arabidopsis and other model tree species (e.g., Populus species). The control of root growth and architecture is related to phytohormone balance and pathway regulation, plant growth and development transcription factors, microRNAs, and signal transduction pathways. Additionally, emerging studies indicate that epigenetic factors likely also play a key role in the adaptive responses of trees to environmental change (for review, see [81,82][44][45]). In the case of epigenetics, work in Populus species on drought stress transcriptomic responses of clonally propagated material planted in differing geographic regions demonstrates specific DNA methylation patterning correlated with provenance and drought stress transcriptomic responses [82][45]. These types of studies linking local adaptation to epigenetic markers in reference to oak adaptation could unlock potential plasticity targets for the improvement of the species.

2.2. Reproduction

In European white oaks, Caignard et al. [83][46] presented evidence that increasing temperatures associated with climate change are responsible for an observed increased seed production in environments that are historically cooler and currently not impacted by water deficit. This contrasts to studies of other oak species in regions experiencing both temperature increase and water deficit, whereby tree growth and survival were negatively impacted by a warming climate [84][47]. Effects on other aspects of oak reproduction (e.g., masting) and the effects of other environmental changes (e.g., drought) need to be established before any meaningful modelling about the future habitat of deciduous oaks in the temperate forests. Current predictions suggest that oaks will expand northward with changing climate zones and retreat in warmer drought-prone areas. A recent limited provenance study of Q. alba performance suggests that white oaks from northern temperate locations, when challenged with more southerly climate conditions, do not perform as well as trees from more southern provenances, suggesting that there may be a fitness cost for Q. alba as the climate zones shift further northward [85][48]. Research into the fundamental genetics and physiology of oak species regeneration in response to environmental conditions are needed to predict outcomes and produce strategies in order to promote the continued presence and establishment of white oaks.

2.3. Pollination

Long-distance pollination is a well-established feature of the maintenance of genetic diversity within oak stands [86][49] (for review, see [7]). Multiple studies of isolated stands have revealed that long-distance pollen dispersal is evident and leads to the conclusion that the fragmentation of oak populations due to repurposed land use may not necessarily lead to local losses in genetic diversity [87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61]. However, other barriers may lead to loss of diversity or inbreeding, such as genetically determined fertilization incompatibilities and/or timing of flowering, which may play a significant role in determining the genetic architecture of oak forest stands, despite pollen dispersal [86][49]. Thus, climate change could lead to local maladaptation, due to incompatible phenology, making it difficult to predict future oak sustainability for species such as Q. alba, for which we know little regarding these traits and at what spatial scales these traits have adapted.

2.4. Flowering

Oaks are monoecious, with staminate and pistillate flowers on the same tree. Little is known of the physiology or genetics of the regulation of flowering in oaks. Contrastingly, there is a substantial body of growing knowledge about the molecular basis of flowering control in some model forest and fruit tree species (for recent review, see [99][62]). Both floral and leaf bud dormancy are initiated and controlled by key environmental factors such as light (day length), cold (chilling requirement), and stress (abiotic: heat, cold, osmotic; biotic: pathogens and pests). All of these will likely be significantly impacted by climate change. The establishment, maintenance, and release of dormancy are regulated by gene networks that respond to these different environmental cues, depending on the individual adaptation of a particular species or population. For example, Prunus fruit trees, such as peach (P. persica), establish, maintain, and release bud dormancy via pathways that are sensitive to temperature [100][63], while in Populus species, these steps are regulated more by day length [101][64] (reviewed by [102,103][65][66]). In general, these networks involve light response networks, temperature response networks, hormone pathways, cell cycle control, epigenetics, and others [99,100][62][63]. Genomics-based research on dormancy in the European pedunculate oak (Q. robur) has highlighted some of the gene networks evident in these previous fruit and forest tree studies, suggesting that oaks may utilize similar genetic control mechanisms as other tree species [104][67]. However, it is difficult to predict and improve the performance of Q. alba in terms of flowering traits (Figure 1S) without first obtaining substantial knowledge of the physiological, ecological, and genetic systems that underpin these traits in this species.

2.5. Masting

Masting is a population scale synchronous flowering event observed in certain tree species. However, as pointed out in a detailed review of the genetic control of masting [105][68], the manifestation of this event is dependent on the diversity in the flowering control mechanism among individual members of the species (diversity) and the coordinated response of these individuals within a population and year (synchrony). A resource-driven pollen limitation hypothesis was directly supported for two European oaks species, Q. petrea and Q. robur [106][69]. From studies of other perennial and annual plant species, the physiological and genetic control of masting could likely involve molecular networks controlling flowering and dormancy release [99,105,107][62][68][70]; abiotic and biotic stress response [108][71]; seed maturation, meristem growth, and developmental control [80,109][43][72]; root/shoot communication and sink-source physiology [110,111][73][74]; the epigenetic regulation of gene activity [112][75], and potentially others. Although not possible in the past, access to gene information in oaks is rapidly increasing (see Emerging tools and resources for oak biology and improvement, below) and the stage is ideally set to make significant progress in understanding the physiological and genetic underpinnings of this important climate critical trait in Q. alba (Figure 1R,T,U).

2.6. Seed Germination

In oaks, there are contrasting climate-related seedling germination strategies. In general, white oaks do not exhibit a stratification requirement and germinate in the fall, concomitant with acorn drop (Figure 1U), while red oak acorns overwinter and germinate the following spring during more favorable growing temperatures [113,114][76][77]. In some red oaks, this stratification requirement is not absolute as acorns will germinate without prior cold treatment (e.g., Quercus pagoda Raf. [115][78]); however, the germination efficiency increases substantially with cold treatment [113[76][78],115], leading to the conclusion that red oaks exhibit a physiological dormancy, rather than true dormancy (endodormancy) which is associated with cell cycle arrest and chill requirement for dormancy release. Unfortunately, we know very little about the genetics and physiology of this climate critical trait in oaks in contrast to what is known regarding annual crop and model species plants. In recent years, through studies of annual crop models, Arabidopsis, and a few woody perennial species (e.g., peach, poplar, and grape), major advances have been made in our understanding of the genetic and physiological underpinnings of seed and bud dormancy in plants. For reviews on seed germination, see [116][79], and for bud dormancy, [99][62]. However, much of our knowledge of seed dormancy and germination control comes from studies of plants with orthodox (annual) or typical seeds, such as Arabidopsis, whereby seeds mature concomitant with desiccation. This is not the case for recalcitrant or intermediate seed species, including oaks or other nut-producing species like chestnut, for which the desiccation of seeds after maturity significantly negatively impacts seed viability and germination [113,117][76][80]. The relationship between the chemistry, germination timing, and dispersal of acorns has been an area of interest for quite some time. An early study on germination in oaks [113][76] suggested that the fat content of acorns may be related to the germination control in red oak acorns and not the tannin content of the seed. Subsequent reports on northern red oak (Quercus rubra) and Q. alba germination and dispersal over the following decades were synthesized into a Differential Dispersal Hypothesis (DDH) [118][81], based on the characteristics of acorns reported to affect germination, feeding, and dispersal by animals. The DDH summarized the primary features of Q. alba acorns affecting dispersal, such as low tannin and low-fat content, and early germination, predisposing Q. alba acorns to immediate and/or selective consumption (relative to northern red oak) in autumn, or embryo excision by squirrels prior to cashing. In northern red oak, acorns traits affecting dispersal included high tannin and high fat content, with delayed germination, associated with the selective caching of northern red oak acorns (relative to Q. alba) for later consumption during winter. Overall, the DDH predicted that northern red oak acorns would be selectively scatter-hoarded by animals across greater dispersal distances than Q. alba, especially smaller-seeded acorns, which jays could disperse over very long distances, primarily into open areas suitable for oak regeneration. More recently, studies in sawtooth white oak (Q. aliena var. accuserata) suggested that the acorn pericarp and cotyledons contain substances that inhibit germination, and that the removal of the pericarp and a portion of the cotyledon can increase germination efficiency [119][82]. The germination morphology of Q. alba seeds (the plumule separated from the cotyledons) (Figure 1U,V) promotes seedling establishment in case of pruning by rodents [120][83]. The comparison of red and white oak species acorns by maturity and germination demonstrates that transitions from maturation to germination show changes in cellular location and the metabolism of lipids, insoluble and soluble carbohydrates, and proteins (reviewed by [121][84]). Many features of the interaction of the genotype, phylogeny, ecotype, and physiology of seed germination remain to be clarified. For a more comprehensive history and detailed overview of ecology and biology research findings for oak seed dispersal, see [122][85]. Recent phylogenomic analyses have also highlighted the importance of seed structure and germination in the radiation of species, as well as introgression, within the Fagaceae family [123][86].

2.7. Seedling Growth Control

In oaks, some studies examine the effect of seed size on seed germination and seedling survival (for review see [124][87]). Among species, the question of seed size versus seed abundance for optimal species survival seems not to be an issue of a simple tradeoff but may also incorporate the longevity of the large-seeded species and the consequences of continued reproduction over extended time periods. Among and within species studies suggest that the larger seeds may have a significant advantage in germination and subsequent seedling recruitment [113,125,126,127,128][76][88][89][90][91]. Llanderal-Mendoza et al. [126][89] suggest that decreases in acorn size along latitudinal climatic differences in Q. rugosa in Mexico effect successful recruitment whereby the northward expansion of the species range has led to smaller-sized acorns with a reduction in germination and recruitment. Conclusions from this work were supported and further extended to other Quercus species in Mexico [127][90], whereby they demonstrated that, in a common garden experiment for seven red oak species and three white oak species, acorn fresh weight was positively correlated with germination efficiency, and acorn dry matter was driving this correlation. Furthermore, they demonstrated that nutritional storage compounds and not water content were responsible for this result. This size effect was consistent when compared between red and white oak species, as well as within red and white oak species. Finally, a recent study [128][91] demonstrated that large seed size was positively correlated with seed viability in Q. robur acorns collected from multiple sites in Croatia over a ten-year period. Larger seedlings can improve the competitive status of oak regeneration relative to average-sized seedlings [34,52,129][92][93][94]. Extra-large seedlings [130,131,132][95][96][97] can be planted to enrich advanced natural regeneration and may be especially critical when harvesting occurs in years of poor mast production, which is a regular occurrence with Q. alba [133][98]. While these seedling size considerations are important, the genetic potential of the seedlings is also important for successful regeneration. Thus, the development of high-quality, well-performing Q. alba seedlings for artificial regeneration should be achievable through a combination of tree genetic improvement and good nursery and planting practices [132][97]. Unfortunately, it is difficult to predict how results from orthodox annual seed plants will translate to oaks and other nut-producing trees. However, we now have the genomic resources and materials in key oak species to bridge this knowledge gap. As stated in [134][99], “hardwood seed production, seed harvest, and seedling production must be approached as a coordinated system where all aspects from flower initiation to seed development, harvest, and storage to seedling production, transplanting and establishment are integrated. The best approach to insure predictable amounts of high-quality seeds and seedlings is to establish and manage seed orchards and use container production”. However, sustained regenerative success in the forest in the long term will rely on an understanding of the genetic and environmental interplay on climate-relevant traits that underpin seed production, germination, and seedling establishment (Figure 1H,R–V). The contrasting strategies of flowering, seed maturation, seed germination, and seedling growth control between sympatric white and red oaks species is ideal for delimiting the genetic architecture of these climate-relevant traits and predicting the impact of climate change on their manifestation. This can lead to optimized management and tree improvement strategies incorporating genetic and physiological knowledge-based inputs.

3. Climate Change and Quercus alba Biology: Indirect Impacts

While the rapidly changing climate can directly impact tree growth and reproduction, it also indirectly impacts tree survival by altering the distributions of pests and pathogens, potentially leading to increased pest and pathogen pressure on native tree populations (for a review, see [135,136,137][100][101][102]). Oaks are susceptible to native and non-native pathogens (Table 1 and Figure 1I–P). Alone, many of these pests and pathogens are not necessarily lethal to the host; however, in concert with the plant stress imposed by a rapidly changing climate, these pathogens can significantly contribute to oak decline [138][103]. Therefore, the introduction of novel non-native pathogens or the climate-driven expansion of native pathogen ranges can be extremely detrimental to previously unexposed forest trees (for examples, see [139][104]). A case in point from a related Fagaceae species is the spread and subsequent impact on the American Chestnut of Phytophthora cinnamomi post its introduction to the eastern US [140,141][105][106]. This oomycete pathogen is hosted by over 5000 different plant species (for a review, see [142][107]) (see Figure 1I for Phytophthora root and crown rots in Q. alba) and is a major destructive pathogen of members of the Fagaceae. Its introduction into the southeastern US has created a major complication to the planned introduction of chestnut blight-resistant American chestnut from chestnut restoration programs. In oaks, its northward expansion with global warming is already impacting oaks and other forest trees as part of the oak decline syndrome in North America and Europe [143,144,145][108][109][110]. Another Phytophthora species, P. ramorum, is responsible for sudden oak death on California oaks (primarily Quercus agrifolia, coast live oak, in the red oak subgenus Erythrobalanus) and the related tanoak species Notholithocarpus densiflorus in the Fagaceae family, as well as other plant species in the western US. Its impact is predicted to mount with increased microclimate variability that is associated with climate change [146,147,148][111][112][113]. Many different diseases affect white oaks, including canker rots [149[114][115],150], oak anthracnose [151[116][117],152], leaf blisters [153][118], stem canker [154][119], oak wilt [155][120], oak decline [156][121], and stem decay [150][115] (Figure 1I–P for Q. alba images). Of all these diseases, oak decline and oak wilt are the two most devastating, with major impacts on oak survival and acorn production, resulting in altered forest structure and composition over time. Several additional diseases and insects that are rarely fatal can also impact acorn production and are expected to increase as climate change advances [157][122]. These relevant pathogens and pests are tabulated below (Table 1).
Table 1.
Pests and pathogens of
Quercus alba
.

Disease

Pathogen/Pest

Relevant Classification

Key Features

Q. alba Resistance?

References

Oak wilt

Bretziella fagacearum (Bretz) (Microascales: Certocystidaceae) (formerly Ceratocystis fagacearum)

Ascomycete fungus, Necrotrophic

Vascular wilt, vectored through root grafts and sap-feeding beetles Scolytidae and Nitidulidae.

Somewhat resistant, exhibiting slower fungal growth.

[158,159,160,161,162,163,164,[123][124][125][126][127][128][129]  165,166,[167,168,130169,170,][131][132][133][134][135] 171,172,173,174][136][137][138][139]

Oak decline

Agrilus bilineatus Weber and Armillaria mellea [Vahl. Ex Fr.] and Phytophthora cinnamomi

Coleptylebran beetle and oomycete hemibiotroph interaction.

Caused by the interaction between severely stressed trees, secondary pests, such as the two-lined chestnut borer, and root diseases like armillaria root rot and ink disease.

Less susceptible than other North American oak species and less severe in young (less than 70 years) and heterogenous stands.

[175,,181][176,140][177,141178,179,][142][143][144]180[145][146]

Hypoxylon cankers

Hypoxylon atropunctatum (Schw. ex Fr.) Cke

Ascomycete fungus, Necrotrophic

Less pathogenic fungal species that frequently accompanies dieback.

Live healthy unstressed trees less susceptible.

[179][144]

Root and crown rot

Phytophthora cinnamomi

Oomycete hemibiotrophic

Extirpated American chestnut and a component of oak decline.

White oaks less effected by this pathogen?

[140,141,142,143,144,[105][106][107][108][109] 145,146,147,148,157][110][111][112][113][122]

Anthracnose

Dendrostoma leiphaemia Senan. and K.D. Hyde (formerly Discula quercina (Westend.) Arx Anamorph of Ascomycete Apiognomonia quercina.

Ascomycete fungus, hemibiotrophic

One of the most damaging leaf and twig diseases, impacting reproduction and masting; widespread across North America.

Leaves are less susceptible as they age due to thicker protective cuticle; large range of the pathogen across a variety of climates suggests adaptation to distinct climates

[151,155,182][116][120][147]

Twig, branch and rots cankers

Botryosphaeria spp. (including B. rhodina [Berk. and Curt.] von Arx, B. dothidea [Moug. ex Fr.] Ces. and de Not., B. obtusa [Schw.] Shoemaker, and B. quercum [Sch.: Fr.] Saccardo) and Botryodiplodia gallae (Schw.) Petrak and Sydow

Ascomycete fungus, necrotrophic/hemi-biotrophic

Can play role in oak decline syndrome.

Most susceptible under drought or cold stress.

[183][148]

Spongy moth (formally gypsy moth)

Lymantia dispar

Lepidopteran insect

A significant insect pest of Q. alba forests, usually in low numbers but occasionally surging to severe outbreaks.

Q. alba is preferred over the hundreds of tree species spongy moth caterpillars feed on.

[184,185,186,187,[150][151188,[149]][152][153] 189,190,191,192][154][155][156][157]

Acorn weevil

Curculio and Conotrachelus spp.

Coleopteran insect

The major oak seed predator and a factor in the reduced regeneration in the eastern United States.

Unknown.

[193,194,195,196][158][159][160][161]

References

  1. Hacket-Pain, A.; Bogdziewicz, M. Climate Change and Plant Reproduction: Trends and Drivers of Mast Seeding Change. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2021, 376, 20200379.
  2. Fralish, J.S. The Keystone Role of Oak and Hickory in the Central Hardwood Forest; Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-73; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station: Asheville, NC, USA, 2004; pp. 78–87.
  3. Binder, S.; Haight, R.G.; Polasky, S.; Warziniack, T.; Mockrin, M.H.; Deal, R.L.; Arthaud, G. Assessment and Valuation of Forest Ecosystem Services: State of the Science Review; Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-170; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station: Newtown Square, PA, USA, 2017; pp. 1–47.
  4. Grattapaglia, D.; Plomion, C.; Kirst, M.; Sederoff, R.R. Genomics of Growth Traits in Forest Trees. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2009, 12, 148–156.
  5. Saleh, D.; Chen, J.; Leplé, J.-C.; Leroy, T.; Truffaut, L.; Dencausse, B.; Lalanne, C.; Labadie, K.; Lesur, I.; Bert, D.; et al. Genome-Wide Evolutionary Response of European Oaks during the Anthropocene. Evol. Lett. 2022, 6, 4–20.
  6. Gollihue, J.; Pook, V.G.; DeBolt, S. Sources of Variation in Bourbon Whiskey Barrels: A Review. J. Inst. Brew. 2021, 127, 210–223.
  7. Mosedale, J.R.; Feuillat, F.; Baumes, R.; Dupouey, J.-L.; Puech, J.-L. Variability of Wood Extractives among Quercus robur and Quercus petraea Trees from Mixed Stands and Their Relation to Wood Anatomy and Leaf Morphology. Can. J. For. Res. 1998, 28, 994–1006.
  8. Abrams, M.D. Where Has All the White Oak Gone? BioScience 2003, 53, 927.
  9. Steiner, K. Genetic Improvement of Oaks in North America. Ann. Des Sci. For. 1993, 50 (Suppl. S1), 359s–367s.
  10. Stringer, J.; Morris, D. Landowners Guide to: Understanding the Importance of White Oak; FOR-147; Cooperative Extension Service, University of Kentucky, Department of Forestry and Natural Resources: Lexington, KY, USA, 2022; p. 3.
  11. Abrams, M.D. History of eastern oak forests. In Managing Oak Forests in the Eastern United States; Keyser, P.D., Fearer, T., Harper, C.A., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2016; pp. 7–17.
  12. Abrams, M.D.; Nowacki, G.J.; Hanberry, B.B. Oak forests and woodlands as Indigenous landscapes in the Eastern United States. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 2021, 149, 101–121.
  13. Whitney, G.G. From Coastal Wilderness to Fruited Plain: A History of Environmental Change in Temperate North America from 1500 to the Present; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1996.
  14. Bogdziewicz, M.; Hacket-Pain, A.; Kelly, D.; Thomas, P.A.; Lageard, J.; Tanentzap, A.J. Climate warming causes mast seeding to break down by reducing sensitivity to weather cues. Glob. Change Biol. 2021, 27, 1952–1961.
  15. Pesendorfer, M.B.; Ascoli, D.; Bogdziewicz, M.; Hacket-Pain, A.; Pearse, I.S.; Vacchiano, G. The ecology and evolution of synchronized reproduction in long-lived plants. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2021, 376, 20200369.
  16. Bogdziewicz, M.; Kelly, D.; Thomas, P.A.; Lageard, J.G.A.; Hacket-Pain, A. Climate Warming Disrupts Mast Seeding and Its Fitness Benefits in European Beech. Nat. Plants 2020, 6, 88–94.
  17. Nussbaumer, A.; Waldner, P.; Apuhtin, V.; Aytar, F.; Benham, S.; Bussotti, F.; Eichhorn, J.; Eickenscheidt, N.; Fabianek, P.; Falkenried, L.; et al. Impact of Weather Cues and Resource Dynamics on Mast Occurrence in the Main Forest Tree Species in Europe. For. Ecol. Manag. 2018, 429, 336–350.
  18. Fraga, H.; Moriondo, M.; Leolini, L.; Santos, J.A. Mediterranean Olive Orchards under Climate Change: A Review of Future Impacts and Adaptation Strategies. Agronomy 2021, 11, 56.
  19. Leisner, C.P. Review: Climate Change Impacts on Food Security-Focus on Perennial Cropping Systems and Nutritional Value. Plant Sci. 2020, 293, 110412.
  20. Tuskan, G.A.; Groover, A.T.; Schmutz, J.; DiFazio, S.P.; Myburg, A.; Grattapaglia, D.; Smart, L.B.; Yin, T.; Aury, J.M.; Kremer, A.; et al. Hardwood Tree Genomics: Unlocking Woody Plant Biology. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1799.
  21. Abbott, A.G.; Georgi, L.L.; Yvergniaux, D.; Wang, Y.; Blenda, A.V.; Reighard, G.L.; Martinez Inigo, M.J.; Sosinski, B. Peach: The Model Genome for Rosaceae. Acta Hortic. 2002, 575, 145–155.
  22. Jansson, S.; Douglas, C.J. Populus: A Model System for Plant Biology. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2007, 58, 435–458.
  23. Jansson, S.; Bhalerao, R.; Groover, A. Springerlink, Online Service. In Genetics and Genomics of Populus; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010; Volume 8.
  24. Arús, P.; Verde, I.; Sosinski, B.; Zhebentyayeva, T.; Abbott, A.G. The Peach Genome. Tree Genet. Genomes 2012, 8, 531–547.
  25. Friedman, J.; Rubin, M.J. All in good time: Understanding annual and perennial strategies in plants. Am. J. Bot. 2015, 102, 497–499.
  26. Hatfield, J.L.; Dold, C. Water-Use Efficiency: Advances and Challenges in a Changing Climate. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 103.
  27. Soh, W.K.; Yiotis, C.; Murray, M.; Parnell, A.; Wright, I.J.; Spicer, R.A.; Lawson, T.; Caballero, R.; McElwain, J.C. Rising CO2 drives divergence in water use efficiency of evergreen and deciduous plants. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, 7906.
  28. Durand, M.; Brendel, O.; Buré, C.; Le Thiec, D. Altered Stomatal Dynamics Induced by Changes in Irradiance and Vapour-Pressure Deficit under Drought: Impacts on the Whole-Plant Transpiration Efficiency of Poplar Genotypes. New Phytol. 2019, 222, 1789–1802.
  29. Torres-Ruiz, J.M.; Kremer, A.; Carins Murphy, M.R.; Brodribb, T.; Lamarque, L.J.; Truffaut, L.; Bonne, F.; Ducousso, A.; Delzon, S. Genetic Differentiation in Functional Traits among European Sessile Oak Populations. Tree Physiol. 2019, 39, 1736–1749.
  30. Homolka, A.; Schueler, S.; Burg, K.; Fluch, S.; Kremer, A. Insights into Drought Adaptation of Two European Oak Species Revealed by Nucleotide Diversity of Candidate Genes. Tree Genet. Genomes 2013, 9, 1179–1192.
  31. Arend, M.; Kuster, T.; Gunthardt-Goerg, M.S.; Dobbertin, M. Provenance-Specific Growth Responses to Drought and Air Warming in Three European Oak Species (Quercus robur, Q. petraea and Q. pubescens). Tree Physiol. 2011, 31, 287–297.
  32. Spieß, N.; Oufir, M.; Matušíková, I.; Stierschneider, M.; Kopecky, D.; Homolka, A.; Burg, K.; Fluch, S.; Hausman, J.-F.; Wilhelm, E. Ecophysiological and Transcriptomic Responses of Oak (Quercus Robur) to Long-Term Drought Exposure and Rewatering. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2012, 77, 117–126.
  33. Magalhães, A.P.; Verde, N.; Reis, F.; Martins, I.; Costa, D.; Lino-Neto, T.; Castro, P.H.; Tavares, R.M.; Azevedo, H. RNA-Seq and Gene Network Analysis Uncover Activation of an ABA-Dependent Signalosome during the Cork Oak Root Response to Drought. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 6, 1195.
  34. Reed, W.P.; Kaye, M.W. Bedrock Type Drives Forest Carbon Storage and Uptake across the Mid-Atlantic Appalachian Ridge and Valley, U.S.A. For. Ecol. Manag. 2020, 460, 117881.
  35. Tirmenstein, D.A. Quercus alba. In Fire Effects Information System, ; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer): Fort Collins, CO, USA, 1991. Available online: https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/tree/quealb/all.html (accessed on 30 November 2023).
  36. Abrams, M.D. Adaptations and Responses to Drought in Quercus Species of North America. Tree Physiol. 1990, 7, 227–238.
  37. Abrams, M. Distribution, Historical Development and Ecophysiological Attributes of Oak Species in the Eastern United States. Ann. Sci. For. 1996, 53, 487–512.
  38. De Micco, V.; Balzano, A.; Wheeler, E.A.; Baas, P. Tyloses and gums: A review of structure, function and occurrence of vessel occlusions. IAWA J. 2016, 37, 186–205.
  39. Allen, M. Managing Oak Woodlands in a Dynamic World. In Proceedings of the 7th California Oak Symposium, Visalia, CA, USA, 3–6 November 2014; General Technical Report PSW-GTR-251 FS. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2015.
  40. Cavender-Bares, J. Diversification, adaptation, and community assembly of the American oaks (Quercus), a model clade for integrating ecology and evolution. New Phytol. 2019, 221, 669–692.
  41. Rogers, R. Quercus alba L. White oak. In Silvics of North America: Hardwoods; Burns, R.M., Ed.; USDA Forest Service: Washington, DC, USA, 1990; pp. 605–613.
  42. Kaproth, M.A.; Hahn, M.; Manos, P.S.; Hipp, L.; González-Rodríguez, A.; Cavender-Bares, J. Functional Leaf and Stem Traits of the Oaks of the Americas. Retrieved from the Data Repository for the University of Minnesota. 2020. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/11299/214055 (accessed on 29 November 2023).
  43. Kościelniak, P.; Glazińska, P.; Kȩsy, J.; Zadworny, M. Formation and Development of Taproots in Deciduous Tree Species. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 772567.
  44. Bräutigam, K.; Vining, K.J.; Lafon-Placette, C.; Fossdal, C.G.; Mirouze, M.; Marcos, J.G.; Fluch, S.; Fraga, M.F.; Guevara, M.Á.; Abarca, D.; et al. Epigenetic Regulation of Adaptive Responses of Forest Tree Species to the Environment. Ecol. Evol. 2013, 3, 399–415.
  45. Raj, S.; Bräutigam, K.; Hamanishi, E.T.; Wilkins, O.; Thomas, B.R.; Schroeder, W.W.; Mansfield, S.D.; Plant, A.L.; Campbell, M.M. Clone History Shapes Populus Drought Responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 12521–12526.
  46. Caignard, T.; Kremer, A.; Firmat, C.; Nicolas, M.; Venner, S.; Delzon, S. Increasing Spring Temperatures Favor Oak Seed Production in Temperate Areas. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8555.
  47. Petritan, A.M.; Petritan, I.C.; Hevia, A.; Walentowski, H.; Bouriaud, O.; Sánchez-Salguero, R. Climate Warming Predispose Sessile Oak Forests to Drought-Induced Tree Mortality regardless of Management Legacies. For. Ecol. Manag. 2021, 491, 119097.
  48. Thomas, A.M.; Coggeshall, M.V.; O’Connor, P.A.; Nelson, D.C. Climate Adaptation in White Oak (Quercus alba, L.): A Forty-Year Study of Growth and Phenology. Forests 2024. submitted.
  49. Ashley, M.V. Answers Blowing in the Wind: A Quarter Century of Genetic Studies of Pollination in Oaks. Forests 2021, 12, 575.
  50. Dow, B.D.; Ashley, M.V. Microsatellite Analysis of Seed Dispersal and Parentage of Saplings in Bur Oak, Quercus Macrocarpa. Mol. Ecol. 1996, 5, 615–627.
  51. Dow, B.D. High Levels of Gene Flow in Bur Oak Revealed by Paternity Analysis Using Microsatellites. J. Hered. 1998, 89, 62–70.
  52. Dow, B.D.; Ashley, M.V. Factors influencing male mating success in bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa. New For. 1998, 15, 161–180.
  53. Streiff, R.; Ducousso, A.; Lexer, C.; Steinkellner, H.; Gloessl, J.; Kremer, A. Pollen dispersal inferred from paternity analysis in a mixed oak stand of Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Mol. Ecol. 1999, 8, 831–841.
  54. Valbuena-Carabãa, M.; González-Martínez, S.C.; Sork, V.L.; Collada, C.; Soto, A.; Goicoechea, P.G.; Gil, L. Gene flow and hybridisation in a mixed oak forest (Quercus pyrenaica Willd. and Quercus petraea (Matts.) Liebl.) in central Spain. Heredity 2005, 95, 457–465.
  55. Craft, K.J.; Ashley, M.V. Landscape genetic structure of bur oak (Quercus macrocarpa) savannas in Illinois. For. Ecol. Manag. 2007, 239, 13–20.
  56. Craft, K.J.; Ashley, M.V. Pollen-mediated gene flow in isolated and continuous stands of bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa (Fagaceae). Am. J. Bot. 2010, 97, 1999–2006.
  57. Nakanishi, A.; Tomaru, N.; Yoshimaru, H.; Kawahara, T.; Manabe, T.; Yamamoto, S. Patterns of pollen flow and genetic differentiation among pollen pools in Quercus salicina in a warm temperate old-growth evergreen broad-leaved forest. Silvae Genet. 2004, 53, 258–264.
  58. Nakanishi, A.; Tomaru, N.; Yoshimaru, H.; Manabe, T.; Yamamoto, S. Effects of seed- and pollen-mediated gene dispersal on genetic structure among Quercus salicina saplings. Heredity 2009, 102, 182–189.
  59. Abraham, S.T.; Zaya, D.N.; Koenig, W.D.; Ashley, M.V. Interspecific and intraspecific pollination patterns of valley oak, Quercus lobata, in a mixed stand in Coastal Central California. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2011, 172, 691–699.
  60. Hampe, A.; Pemonge, M.-H.; Petit, R.J. Efficient mitigation of founder effects during the establishment of a leading-edge oak population. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2013, 280, 20131070.
  61. Gerber, S.; Chadoeuf, J.; Gugerli, F.; Lascoux, M.; Buiteveld, J.; Cottrell, J.; Dounavi, A.; Fineschi, S.; Forrest, L.L.; Fogelqvist, J.; et al. High rates of gene flow by pollen and seed in oak populations across Europe. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e85130.
  62. Yang, Q.; Gao, Y.; Wu, X.; Moriguchi, T.; Bai, S.; Teng, Y. Bud endodormancy in deciduous fruit trees: Advances and prospects. Hortic. Res. 2021, 8, 139.
  63. Abbott, A.G.; Zhebentyayeva, T.; Barakat, A.; Liu, Z. The genetic control of bud-break in trees. In Advances in Botanical Research; Plomion, C., Blondon, A.-F., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 201–228.
  64. Böhlenius, H.; Huang, T.; Charbonnel-Campaa, L.; Brunner, A.M.; Jansson, S.; Strauss, S.H.; Nilsson, O. CO/FT Regulatory Module Controls Timing of Flowering and Seasonal Growth Cessation in Trees. Science 2006, 312, 1040–1043.
  65. Singh, R.K.; Maurya, J.P.; Azeez, A.; Miskolczi, P.; Tylewicz, S.; Stojkovič, K.; Delhomme, N.; Busov, V.; Bhalerao, R.P. A genetic network mediating the control of bud break in hybrid aspen. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4173.
  66. Azeez, A.; Zhao, Y.C.; Singh, R.K.; Yordanov, Y.S.; Dash, M.; Miskolczi, P.; Stojkovič, K.; Strauss, S.H.; Bhalerao, R.P.; Busov, V.B. EARLY BUD-BREAK 1 and EARLY BUD-BREAK 3 control resumption of poplar growth after winter dormancy. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1123.
  67. Lesur, I.; Le Provost, G.; Bento, P.; Da Silva, C.; Leplé, J.-C.; Murat, F.; Ueno, S.; Bartholomé, J.; Lalanne, C.; Ehrenmann, F.; et al. The oak gene expression atlas: Insights into Fagaceae genome evolution and the discovery of genes regulated during bud dormancy release. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 112.
  68. Satake, A.; Kelly, D. Supplementary material from “Studying the genetic basis of masting”. R. Soc. Collect. 2021, 376, 20210116.
  69. Schermer, É.; Bel-Venner, M.C.; Fouchet, D.; Siberchicot, A.; Boulanger, V.; Caignard, T.; Thibaudon, M.; Oliver, G.; Nicolas, M.; Gaillard, J.M.; et al. Pollen limitation as a main driver of fruiting dynamics in oak populations. Ecol. Lett. 2019, 22, 98–107.
  70. Yu, J.; Conrad, A.O.; Decroocq, V.; Zhebentyayeva, T.; Williams, D.E.; Bennett, D.; Roch, G.; Audergon, J.-M.; Dardick, C.; Liu, Z.; et al. Distinctive Gene Expression Patterns Define Endodormancy to Ecodormancy Transition in Apricot and Peach. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 180.
  71. Kobayashi, M.J.; Takeuchi, Y.; Kenta, T.; Kume, T.; Diway, B.; Shimizu, K.K. Mass flowering of the tropical tree Shorea beccariana was preceded by expression changes in flowering and drought responsive genes. Mol. Ecol. 2013, 22, 4767–4782.
  72. Hacket-Pain, A.J.; Friend, A.D.; Lageard, J.G.A.; Thomas, P.A. The influence of masting phenomenon on growth–climate relationships in trees: Explaining the influence of previous summers’ climate on ring width. Tree Physiol. 2015, 35, 319–330.
  73. Baslam, M.; Mitsui, T.; Sueyoshi, K.; Ohyama, T. Recent Advances in Carbon and Nitrogen Metabolism in C3 Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 318.
  74. Tegeder, M.; Masclaux-Daubresse, C. Source and sink mechanisms of nitrogen transport and use. New Phytol. 2018, 217, 35–53.
  75. Kurpisz, B.; Pawłowski, T.A. Epigenetic Mechanisms of Tree Responses to Climatic Changes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13412.
  76. Korstian, C.F. Factors Controlling Germination and Early Survival in Oaks; Yale University School of Forestry Bulletin No. 19; Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, USA, 1927; 115p.
  77. Olsen, D.F.; Boyce, S.G. Factors Affecting Acorn Production and Germination and Early Growth of Seedlings and Seedling Sprouts. In Proceedings of the Oak Symposium Proceedings, Morgantown, WV, USA, 16–20 August 1971; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station: Upper Darby, PA, USA, 1971; pp. 44–48.
  78. Hawkins, T.S. The Influence of Dormancy Break Requirements on Germination and Viability Responses to Winter Submergence in Acorns of Three Bottomland Red Oak (Sect. Lobatae) Species. For. Sci. 2019, 65, 556–561.
  79. Carrera-Castaño, G.; Calleja-Cabrera, J.; Pernas, M.; Gómez, L.; Oñate-Sánchez, L. An Updated Overview on the Regulation of Seed Germination. Plants 2020, 9, 703.
  80. Sung, S.-J.S.; Kormanik, P.P.; Cook, C.D.; Zarnoch, S.J.; Kormanik, T.L. Effect of Acorn Moisture Content at Sowing on Germination and Seedling Growth of White Oak and Northern Red Oak. In Proceedings of the 13th Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference, Memphis, TN, USA, 28 February–4 March 2005; Kristina, F.C., Ed.; Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-92. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station: Asheville, NC, USA, 2006; pp. 241–246.
  81. Steele, M.A.; Smallwood, P.; Terzaghi, W.B.; Carlson, J.E.; Contreras, T.; McEuen, A. Oak dispersal syndromes: Do red and white oaks exhibit different dispersal strategies? In Upland Oak Ecology Symposium; Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS–73; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station: Asheville, NC, USA, 2002; pp. 72–77.
  82. Liu, Y.; Liu, G.; Li, Q.; Liu, Y.; Hou, L.; Li, G.L. Influence of pericarp, cotyledon and inhibitory substances on sharp tooth oak (Quercus aliena var. acuteserrata) germination. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, 47682.
  83. Yi, X.; Yang, Y.; Curtis, R.; Bartlow, A.W.; Agosta, S.J.; Steele, M.A. Alternative strategies of seed predator escape by early-germinating oaks in Asia and North America. Ecol. Evol. 2012, 2, 487–492.
  84. Bonner, F.T.; Vozzo, J.A. Seed Biology and Technology of Quercus; Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-66; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station: New Orleans, LA, USA, 1987.
  85. Steele, M.A. Oak Seed Dispersal: A Study in Plant-Animal Interactions; The Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2021.
  86. Zhou, B.F.; Yuan, S.; Crowl, A.A.; Liang, Y.Y.; Shi, Y.; Chen, X.Y.; An, Q.Q.; Kang, M.; Manos, P.S.; Wang, B. Phylogenomic analyses highlight innovation and introgression in the continental radiations of Fagaceae across the Northern Hemisphere. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1320.
  87. Moles, A.T.; Westoby, M. Seedling survival and seed size: A synthesis of the literature. J. Ecol. 2004, 92, 372–383.
  88. Long, T.; Jones, R. Seedling growth strategies and seed size effects in fourteen oak species native to different soil moisture habitats. Trees 1996, 11, 1–8.
  89. Llanderal-Mendoza, J.; Gugger, P.F.; Oyama, K.; Uribe-Salas, D.; Gonzales-Rodriguez, A. Climatic determinants of acorn size and germination percentage of Quercus rugosa (Fagaceae) along a latitudinal gradient in Mexico. Bot. Sci. 2017, 95, 37–45.
  90. Sánchez-Montes de Oca, E.J.; Badano, E.I.; Silva-Alvarado, L.-E.; Flores, J.; Barragán-Torres, F.; Flores-Cano, J.A. Acorn weight as determinant of germination in red and white oaks: Evidences from a common-garden greenhouse experiment. Ann. For. Sci. 2018, 75, 12.
  91. Gavranović Markić, A.; Bogdan, S.; Gradečki Poštenjak, M.; Lanšćak, M.; Vujnović, Z.; Bogunović, S.; Ivanković, M. Acorn Yields and Seed Viability of Pedunculate Oak in a 10-year Period in Forest Seed Objects across Croatia. South-East Eur. For. 2022, 13, 27–36.
  92. Johnson, P.S.; Shifley, S.R.; Rogers, R.; Dey, D.C.; Kabrick, J.M. The Ecology and Silviculture of Oaks; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2019.
  93. Loftis, D.L. Upland oak regeneration and management. In Upland Oak Ecology Symposium: History, Current Conditions, and Sustainability; Spetich, M.A., Ed.; USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-73; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station: Asheville, NC, USA, 2004; pp. 163–167.
  94. Brose, P.H.; Van Lear, D.H. Survival of hardwood regeneration during prescribed fires: The importance of root development and root collar location. In Upland Oak Ecology Symposium: History, Current Conditions, and Sustainability; Spetich, M.A., Ed.; SRS-73, Gen. Tech. Rep; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station: Asheville, NC, USA, 2004; pp. 123–127.
  95. Kormanik, P.P.; Sung, S.-J.; Zarnoch, S.J.; Tibbs, G.T. Artificial regeneration of northern red oak and white oak on high-quality sites: Effect of root morphology and relevant biological characteristics. In Proceedings of the 2001 National Silviculture Workshop; Parker, S., Hummel, S.S., Eds.; Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-546. USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station: Portland, OR, USA, 2002; pp. 83–91.
  96. Kormanik, P.P.; Sung, S.-J.; Kormanik, T.L. Growing, selecting, and establishing 1-0 Quercus rubra and Q. alba seedlings for rapid growth and early acorn production on forested lands in the southeastern United States. J. Int. Oak Soc. 2004, 15, 119–125.
  97. Sung, S.-J.; Kormanik, P.P.; Zarnoch, S.J. Growth and development of first-year nursery-grown white oak seedlings of individual mother trees. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference, Knoxville, TN, USA, 20–22 March 2022; Outcalt, K.W., Ed.; Gen. Tech. Rep., SRS-48. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station: Asheville, NC, USA, 2002; Volume 622, pp. 346–351.
  98. Greenberg, C.H.; Parresol, B.R. Dynamics of acorn production by five species of southern Appalachian oaks. In Oak Forest Ecosystems: Ecology and Management for Wildlife; McShea, W.J., Healy, W.M., Eds.; Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2002; pp. 149–172.
  99. Struve, D.K. Seed Conditioning of Red Oak: A Recalcitrant North American Seed. Sci. Agric. Piracicaba 1998, 55, 67–73.
  100. Sturrock, R. Climate Change and Forest Diseases: Using Today’s Knowledge to Address Future Challenges. For. Syst. 2012, 21, 329–336.
  101. Tiberi, R.; Branco, M.; Bracalini, M.; Croci, F.; Panzavolta, T. Cork Oak Pests: A Review of Insect Damage and Management. Ann. For. Sci. 2016, 73, 219–232.
  102. Jactel, H.; Koricheva, J.; Castagneyrol, B. Responses of Forest Insect Pests to Climate Change: Not so Simple. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2019, 35, 103–108.
  103. Haavik, L.J.; Billings, S.A.; Guldin, J.M.; Stephen, F.M. Emergent Insects, Pathogens and Drought Shape Changing Patterns in Oak Decline in North America and Europe. For. Ecol. Manag. 2015, 354, 190–205.
  104. Loo, J.A. Ecological Impacts of Non-Indigenous Invasive Fungi as Forest Pathogens. Biol. Invasions 2008, 11, 81–96.
  105. Anagnostakis, S.L. The Effect of Multiple Importations of Pests and Pathogens on a Native Tree. Biol. Invasions 2001, 3, 245–254.
  106. Sena, K.; Crocker, E.; Vincelli, P.; Barton, C. Phytophthora cinnamomi as a Driver of Forest Change: Implications for Conservation and Management. For. Ecol. Manag. 2018, 409, 799–807.
  107. Hardham, A.R.; Blackman, L.M. Phytophthora cinnamomi . Mol. Plant Pathol. 2018, 19, 260–285.
  108. Garbelotto, M.; Hüberli, D.; Shaw, D. First Report on an Infestation of Phytophthora cinnamomi in Natural Oak Woodlands of California and Its Differential Impact on Two Native Oak Species. Plant Dis. 2006, 90, 685.
  109. McConnell, M.E.; Balci, Y. Phytophthora cinnamomias a Contributor to White Oak Decline in Mid-Atlantic United States Forests. Plant Dis. 2014, 98, 319–327.
  110. Moricca, S.; Linaldeddu, B.T.; Ginetti, B.; Scanu, B.; Franceschini, A.; Ragazzi, A. Endemic and Emerging Pathogens Threatening Cork Oak Trees: Management Options for Conserving a Unique Forest Ecosystem. Plant Dis. 2016, 100, 2184–2193.
  111. Garbelotto, M.; Hayden, K.J. Sudden Oak Death: Interactions of the Exotic Oomycete Phytophthora ramorum with Naïve North American Hosts. Eukaryot. Cell 2012, 11, 1313–1323.
  112. DiLeo, M.V.; Bostock, R.M.; Rizzo, D.M. Microclimate Impacts Survival and Prevalence of Phytophthora ramorum in Umbellularia Californica, a Key Reservoir Host of Sudden Oak Death in Northern California Forests. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e98195.
  113. Kozanitas, M.; Metz, M.R.; Osmundson, T.W.; Serrano, M.S.; Garbelotto, M. The Epidemiology of Sudden Oak Death Disease Caused by Phytophthora ramorum in a Mixed Bay Laurel-Oak Woodland Provides Important Clues for Disease Management. Pathogens 2022, 11, 250.
  114. Banerjee, S. An Oak (Quercus Robur L.) Canker Caused by Stereum Rugosum (Pers.) Fr. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1956, 39, 267-IN5.
  115. Davidson, R.W.; Campbell, W.A.; Vaughn, D.B. Fungi Causing Decay of Living Oaks in the Eastern United States and Their CuItural Identification; Technical Bulletin No. 785; US Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 1942.
  116. Fergus, C.L. Relation of weather to the severity of white oak anthracnose. Phytopathology 1953, 43, 103–105.
  117. Neely, D.; Himelick, E.B. Characteristics and Nomenclature of the Oak Anthracnose Fungus. Phytopathology 1967, 57, 1230–1236.
  118. Goode, M.J. Control of oak leaf-blister in Mississippi. Phytopathology 1953, 43, 472.
  119. Reed, S.E.; EngLish, J.T.; Muzika, R.M. Investigation of Rapid White Oak (Quercus alba) Mortality within the Ozark Plateau and Adjacent Forest-Prairie Transition Ecoregion. In Forest Health Monitoring: National Status, Trends, and Analysis; Gen. Tech. Rep.; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station: Asheville, NC, USA, 2015; p. 127.
  120. Gibbs, J.N. Oak Wilt. Arboric. J. 1978, 3, 351–356.
  121. Oak, S.W.; Spetich, M.A.; Morin, R.S. Oak decline in central hardwood forests: Frequency, spatial extent, and scale. In Natural Disturbances and Historic Range of Variation: Type, Frequency, Severity, and Post-Disturbance Structure in Central Hardwood Forests USA; Greenberg, C., Collins, B., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; Volume 32, pp. 49–71.
  122. Serrano, M.S.; Romero, M.Á.; Homet, P.; Gómez-Aparicio, L. Climate Change Impact on the Population Dynamics of Exotic Pathogens: The Case of the Worldwide Pathogen Phytophthora Cinnamomi. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2022, 322, 109002.
  123. De Beer, Z.W.; Marincowitz, S.; Duong, T.A.; Wingfield, M.J. Bretziella, a New Genus to Accommodate the Oak Wilt Fungus, Ceratocystis Fagacearum (Microascales, Ascomycota). MycoKeys 2017, 27, 1–19.
  124. Henry, B.W. Oak Wilt: Its Significance, Symptoms and Cause. Phytopathology 1944, 34, 636–647.
  125. Gibbs, J.N. The Transmission of Oak Wilt; North Central Forest Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture: St. Paul, MN, USA, 1980.
  126. True, R.P. Oak Wilt in West Virginia. Oak Wilt West Virginia, 448t. 1960. Available online: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/wv_agricultural_and_forestry_experiment_station_bulletins/649 (accessed on 28 November 2023).
  127. Bretz, T.W. Plant Diseases: The Yearbook of Agriculture: Oak Wilt, a New Threat; USDA: Washington, DC, USA, 1953.
  128. Juzwik, J.; Harrington, T.C.; MacDonald, W.L.; Appel, D.N. The Origin of Ceratocystis Fagacearum, the Oak Wilt Fungus. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2008, 46, 13–26.
  129. Cervenka, V.J.; Skalbeck, T.C.; Kyhl, J.F.; Blackford, D.C.; Juzwik, J.; Seybold, S.J. How to Identify Common Nitidulid Beetles Associated with Oak Wilt Mats in Minnesota; USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station: St. Paul, MN, USA, 2001; Volume 71.
  130. Epstein, A.H. Root graft transmission of tree pathogens. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1978, 16, 181–192.
  131. Oak, S.W. Native Diseases and Insects That Impact Oaks. In Oak Forest Ecosystems: Ecology and Management for Wildlife; Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2002; pp. 80–99.
  132. Pokorny, J. How to collect field samples and identify the oak wilt fungus in the laboratory. In Proceedings of the Shade Tree Wilt Diseases: A National Conference, St. Paul, MN, USA, 25–28 August 1999; American Phytopathological Society (APS Press): St. Paul, MN, USA, 2001; p. 139.
  133. O’Brien, J.G.; Mielke, M.E.; Starkey, D.; Juzwik, J. How to Prevent and Control Oak Wilt; USDA Forest Service, State and Private Forestry: St. Paul, MN, USA, 2000.
  134. Young, R.A. Studies in oak wilt caused by Chalara quercina. Phytopathology 1949, 38, 425–441.
  135. Anderson, R.L.; Skilling, D.D. Oak Wilt Damage: A Survey in Central Wisconsin; Station Paper; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station: St. Paul, MN, USA, 1955; p. 11.
  136. Liese, W.; Ruetze, M. Development of a Fumigation Treatment of Oak Logs against Ceratocystis Fagacearum. EPPO Bull. 1985, 15, 29–36.
  137. MacDonald, W.L.; Schmidt, E.L.; Harner, E.J. Methyl Bromide Eradication of the Oak Wilt Fungus from Red and White Oak Logs. For. Prod. J. 1985, 35, 11–16.
  138. Schmidt, E.L.; Ruetze, M.M.; French, D.W. Methyl bromide treatment of oak wilt infected logs: Laboratory and preliminary field fumigations . For. Prod. J. 1982, 32, 46–49.
  139. Yang, A.; Seabright, K.; Juzwik, J.; Myers, S.W.; Taylor, A. Survival of the Oak Wilt Fungus in Logs Fumigated with Sulfuryl Fluoride and Methyl Bromide. For. Prod. J. 2019, 69, 87–95.
  140. Manion, P.D. Tree Disease Concepts; Prentice-Hall, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1981; p. 399.
  141. Lawrence, R.; Moltzan, B.; Moser, W.K. Oak decline and the future of Missouri’s forests. Mo. Conserv. 2002, 63, 11–18.
  142. Wargo, P.M.; Houston, D.R. Infection of defoliated sugar maple trees by Armillaria mellea. Phytopathology 1974, 64, 817–822.
  143. Wargo, P.M.; Houston, D.R.; LaMadeleine, L.S. Oak Decline; Forest Insect and Disease Leaflet 165; U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service: Washington, DC, USA, 1983; 8p.
  144. Starkey, D.A.; Oliveria, F.; Mangini, A.; Mielke, M. Oak Decline and Red Oak Borer in the Interior Highlands of Arkansas and Missouri: Natural Phenomena, Severe Occurrences; Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-73; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station: Asheville, NC, USA, 2004; pp. 217–222.
  145. Wargo, P.M. Armillariella mellea and Agrilus bilineatus and Mortality of Defoliated Oak Trees. For. Sci. 1977, 23, 485–492.
  146. Starkey, D.A.; Oak, S.W.; Ryan, G.W.; Tainter, F.H.; Redmond, C.; Brown, H.C. Evaluation of Oak Decline Areas in the South; Protection Report R8-PR (USA); U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: Atlanta, GA, USA, 1989.
  147. Senanayake, I.C.; Jeewon, R.; Chomnunti, P.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; Norphanphoun, C.; Karunarathna, A.; Pem, D.; Perera, R.H.; Camporesi, E.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; et al. Taxonomic Circumscription of Diaporthales Based on Multigene Phylogeny and Morphology. Fungal Divers. 2018, 93, 241–443.
  148. Sinclair, W.A.; Lyon, H.H.; Johnson, W.T. Diseases of Trees and Shrubs; Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY, USA, 1987.
  149. Elkinton, J.S.; Healy, W.M.; Liebhold, A.M.; Buonaccorsi, J.P. Gypsy moths and forest dynamics. In Oak Forest Ecosystems: Ecology and Management for Wildlife; Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2002; pp. 100–112.
  150. EDDMapS. Early Detection & Distribution Mapping System. The University of Georgia—Center for Invasive Species and Ecosystem Health. Available online: http://www.eddmaps.org/ (accessed on 27 November 2023).
  151. Elkinton, J.S.; Liebhold, A.M. Population Dynamics of Gypsy Moth in North America. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1990, 35, 571–596.
  152. Williams, D.W.; Fuester, R.W.; Metterhouse, W.W.; Balaam, R.J.; Bullock, R.H.; Chianese, R.J.; Reardo, R.C. Incidence and Ecological Relationships of Parasitism in Larval Populations of Lymantria Dispar (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Biol. Control 1992, 2, 35–43.
  153. Williams, D.W.; Liebhold, A.M. Influence of Weather on the Synchrony of Gypsy Moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) Outbreaks in New England. Environ. Entomol. 1995, 24, 987–995.
  154. Drake, W.E. Evaluation of an approach to improve acorn production during thinning. In Proceedings of the Eighth Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference, Auburn, AL, USA, 1–3 November 1994; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station: Radnor, PA, USA, 1995; pp. 429–441.
  155. Hough, J.A.; Pimentel, D. Influence of Host Foliage on Development, Survival, and Fecundity of the Gypsy Moth. Environ. Entomol. 1978, 7, 97–102.
  156. Gottschalk, K.W. Gypsy moth effects on mast production. In Proceedings of Southern Appalachian Mast Management Workshop, Knoxville, TN, USA, 14–16 August 1989; McGee, C.E., Ed.; University of Tennessee: Knoxville, TN, USA, 1989; pp. 42–50.
  157. Forbush, E.H.; Fernald, C.H. The Gypsy Moth: Porthetria dispar (linn.). A Report of the Work of Destroying the Insect in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Together with an Account of Its History and Habits Both in Massachusetts and Europe; Wright & Potter Printing Company: Boston, MA, USA, 1896.
  158. Christisen, D.M. Yield of Seed by Oaks in the Missouri Ozarks. J. For. 1955, 53, 439–441.
  159. Gibson, L.P. Insects That Damage Red Oak Acorns; Research Paper NE-492; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station: Newtown Square, PA, USA, 1982.
  160. Riccardi, C.L.; McCarthy, B.C.; Long, R.P. Oak seed production, weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) populations, and predation rates in mixed-oak forests of southeast Ohio. In Proceedings of the 14th Central Hardwood Forest Conference, Wooster, OH, USA, 16–19 March 2004; Yaussy, D.L., Hix, D.M., Long, R.P., Goebel, C.P., Eds.; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station: Newtown Square, PA, USA, 2004; pp. 10–21.
  161. Miller, D.R.; Schlarbaum, S.E. Acorn Fall and Weeviling in a Northern Red Oak Seedling Orchard. J. Entomol. Sci. 2005, 40, 31–38.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback