CO
2 can be captured directly from industrial sources through three methods: post-combustion capture, pre-combustion capture, and combustion of fossil fuels in a pure oxygen environment. Post-combustion capture, which uses chemical solvents such as monoethanolamine, separates CO
2 from the exhaust gas, which is composed mainly of a mixture of N
2 and CO
2 [6][10]. Researchers are directing efforts to reduce costs and improve the efficiency of post-combustion capture. This involves exploring more effective chemical solvents and membranes for separating CO
2 from N
2. At the same time, materials are being developed to reduce investment costs in large separation equipment required for industrial-scale capture. Research also focuses on the development of new materials capable of resisting higher temperatures and pressures, aiming to improve efficiency in energy generation with CO
2 capture
[6][10].
One of the alternatives for reducing CO
2 emissions into the atmosphere is the conversion of atmospheric CO
2 into low-carbon fuels. It can be used as an energy storage carrier, demonstrating great importance in alleviating energy shortages and global environmental pollution
[7][11]. Currently, several methods for CO
2 conversion are being investigated, such as photocatalytic reduction, electrocatalytic reduction, and photoelectrocatalytic CO
2 reduction. Photocatalytic reduction of CO
2, similar to the photosynthetic process in plants, seeks to convert atmospheric CO
2 into oxygen, a function performed by green plants and photosynthetic bacteria. Over the years, scientists have developed and designed several types of photocatalysts, covering metal oxides, metal nitrides, metal phosphides, and semiconductors, among other materials
[7][11]. Although there are a variety of photocatalytic materials, their practical efficiency has not yet reached an ideal level. Given this, researchers have explored techniques to improve photocatalytic performance, involving control of morphology and size, manipulation of the crystalline face, doping, application of noble metals, recombination of semiconductors, sensitization by dyes, and introduction of defects, among other approaches
[7][11].
The other two methods to reduce carbon dioxide emissions are electrocatalytic reduction of CO
2 and photoelectrocatalytic reduction of CO
2. The first method is the process that uses the external electric field as the main source of energy to induce the redox reaction in the electrodes and the photoelectrocatalytic reduction of CO
2, as the two previous techniques present limitations for their application. Another method is the photoelectrocatalytic reduction of CO
2, which refers to the process in which the semiconductor photoelectrode generates electrons by photoexcitation, and then electrons migrate to the electrode surface under the guidance of an external voltage to carry out the catalytic reduction of CO
2 [7][11].
Concerning other processes that involve CO
2 capture, it is adsorption, because a good adsorbent should present high selectivity, high adsorption capacity at low pressure, fast adsorption/desorption kinetics, good mechanical properties, high hydrothermal and chemical stability, high regeneration capacity, and low synthesis costs. Some examples that have been studied are zeolites, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), and carbon-based adsorbents
[8][12].
CO
2 captured from various sources can be reused in a process known as carbon capture and utilization. This not only reduces the CO
2 concentration in the atmosphere but also reduces dependence on fossil fuel raw materials. Research focuses on CO
2 storage and capture techniques, particularly the effective and long-term use of catalysts in various CO
2 conversion reactions. Transforming this pollutant into value-added products represents a significant challenge, but it also offers many opportunities to reduce CO
2 emissions
[8][12].
Furthermore, other approaches to dealing with CO
2 include capturing and storing it or converting it into valuable chemicals. Another method that is being extensively studied and researched is the recycling of the CO
2 molecules by electrochemical reduction
[9][13]. The electrochemical route is the most promising of the alternatives available for CO
2 reduction, as it does not require high temperatures or high pressures for efficient reduction, uses water as a source of protons, and allows greater product selectivity than that obtained with other reduction methods. In addition to having greater operational flexibility, it can be easily installed in places with difficult access and/or the availability of cheap energy
[10][11][12][14,15,16].
2. Electrocatalysts Types in the Electrochemical Reduction of CO2
An electrocatalyst participates in an electron transfer reaction (at an electrode) and facilitates the acceleration of a chemical reaction
[13][14][26,52]. Electron transfer reactions are the most important processes at electrochemical interfaces. They are determined by the interaction between the interaction of the reagent with the solvent and the electronic levels of the electrode surface. Both electron transfer and kinetic chemistry must be fast for an efficient electrocatalyst
[15][51]. Furthermore, an ideal electrocatalyst must present a good thermodynamic correspondence between the redox potential for the electron transfer reaction and the chemical reaction being catalyzed (e.g., reduction of CO
2 to CO)
[13][14][26,52].
The effectiveness of the electrochemical reduction of CO
2 is directly linked to the electrocatalyst, making it possible to adjust its activity and selectivity by modifying its structure. To improve electrocatalysts, two engineering protocols are widely employed: (1) increase the number of active sites on an electrode, exposing more active sites per gram through optimization of the catalyst structure; and (2) improve the intrinsic activity of each active site. These strategies are not mutually exclusive and can be combined to achieve significant improvements. Several approaches, such as nanostructures, the use of supports, modeling, alloy formation, and doping with heteroatoms, among others, are used in the manufacture of high-performance catalysts
[16][53].
The electrocatalyst used and the applied potential electrode have a great influence on the final reduction products
[10][11][17][14,15,25]. Metallic electrodes, such as Cu, Au, and Sn, have been extensively explored in recent decades for CO
2 reduction. The generation of intermediate CO
2 is crucial to the rate of CO
2 reduction in most cases. Therefore, the main function of these electrocatalysts is to stabilize this intermediate to achieve high energy efficiency in reducing CO
2. Metal electrodes can be classified into three groups, depending on the binding tendency of intermediates and final products, as shown in
Figure 1. Group I has difficulty binding to the CO
2 intermediate, resulting in the formation of formate or formic acid by an outer sphere mechanism. Group II, the intermediate *CO obtained, is weakly bound to the metal surface, being easily dissolved and emerging as the predominant product. Group III, represented only by Cu, is capable of binding and converting the *CO intermediate into higher value-added products, such as hydrocarbons and alcohols, through *COH or *CHO intermediates
[18][54].
Figure 1.
Classification of metal electrodes with their respective products.
To implement practical applications in the electrochemical reduction of CO
2, it is necessary to develop electrocatalysts efficient in electron transfer that operate close to the thermodynamic potential of the reaction to be conducted. Therefore, it is essential to choose a catalyst that contributes to accelerating the reaction of interest as well as the supporting electrolyte that favors the processes
[19][20][7,55].
Electrocatalysts can be classified into three types, such as metallic, non-metallic, and molecular. The materials used in the preparation of the catalysts are what designate their characteristics. Therefore, metallic catalysts can have a metal in their composition or a combination of two metals, termed monometallic or bimetallic. For non-metallic catalysts, the most commonly used materials are carbon nanofiber, nitrogen-doped carbon, metal-organic structure, known as MOF, and covalent-organic structure, Covalent-Organic Framework (COF). On the other hand, molecular catalysts present in their composition the formation of macrocyclic complexes linked to some metals
[21][22][56,57]. The electrocatalyst material involves the conversion of CO
2 into various products, as listed in
Table 1.
Table 1.
Main electrocatalysts described in the literature with their respective Faradaic efficiency, stability, and final products.
Electrocatalyst |
Electrolyte |
Main Product |
Faradaic Efficiency |
Stability |
Ref. |
FeF20TPP/CNT-CF/CC |
0.5 M NaHCO3 |
HCOOH |
95% |
50 h |
[23][58] |
CuSn-4 |
0.5 M KHCO3 |
HCOOH |
93.7% |
- |
[24][59] |
Ni@HNC |
0.1 M KHCO3 |
CO |
98.7% |
- |
[25][60] |
Ag-NP |
2 M KOH |
CO |
99.9% |
- |
[26][61] |
Cu-polyamine |
1 M KOH |
C2H4 |
72% |
3 h |
[27][62] |
Cu/PTFE |
0.1M KHCO3 |
C2+ |
80% |
24 h |
[28][63] |
Cu-12 |
0.1M KHCO3 |
C2H4 |
64% |
190 h |
[29][64] |
Cu/Ni(OH) |
0.5 M NaHCO3 |
CO |
92% |
22 h |
[30][65] |
4H/fcc Au-MMT |
1.0 M KHCO3 |
HCOOH |
92.3% |
12 h |
[31][66] |
CNT@mC/Ni |
0.5 M KHCO3 |
CO |
98% |
24 h |
[32][67] |
Ag75/C |
1 M KOH |
CO, H2, and HCOOH |
90.1% |
30 h |
[33][68] |
Pd/PdOx |
0.5 M KHCO3 |
CO |
90% |
24 h |
[34][69] |
ZnO |
1 M KOH |
CO |
91.6% |
18 h |
[35][70] |
Ni-N2-C |
0.5 M KHCO3 |
HCOOH |
98% |
10 h |
[36][71] |
Bi-N4 |
0.1 M NaHCO3 |
CO |
97% |
4 h |
[37][72] |
CuNNs |
5 M NaOH |
C2H4 |
52% |
6 h |
[38][73] |
Sn |
0.1 M Na2SO4 |
HCOOH |
95% |
10 h |
[39][74] |
Cu–In |
0.1 M KHCO3 |
CO |
55% |
24 h |
[40][75] |
CuO–Sn |
0.1 M KHCO3 |
CO |
90% |
14 h |
[41][76] |
Cu nanowire |
0.1 M KHCO3 |
CO, HCOOH, C2H4 |
17.5% |
5 h |
[42][77] |
Cu (dendrite) |
[EMIM](BF4)/H2O (85/15 v/v) |
HCOOH |
87% |
8 h |
[43][78] |
Ag |
0.5 M KHCO3 |
CO |
30–80% |
285 min |
[44][79] |
Sn |
0.5 M KHCO3 + 2 M KCl |
HCOOH |
70% |
4 h |
[45][80] |
Cu-based metal–organic porous materials |
0.5 M KHCO3 |
CH3OH, C2H5OH |
56% |
90 min |
[46][81] |
Cu2O/ZnO |
0.5 M KHCO3 |
CH4 C2H4 |
31.4% |
90 min |
[47][82] |
Analyzing the work presented in
Table 1,
itwe can
be observe
d that several types of electrocatalysts enable the reduction of CO
2 with high efficiency. Furthermore, it is noted that the most enterprising venture is metallic
[22][48][57,83], with copper being used. This factor is related to its characteristic of continuing the reduction of CO
2 into aldehydes, hydrocarbons, and alcohol with high efficiency
[49][84].
In previous publications regarding CO
2, Hori et al. studied the intermediate products by reducing CO at Cu electrodes, which is subsequently reduced to hydrocarbons and alcohols. CO is also formed on Ni and Pt electrodes and subsequently adsorbed on the electrode. And in this way, the adsorbed CO prevents further reduction of CO
2 in Ni and Pt. These points lead the metal electrodes to be classified into two groups: CO formation metals (Cu, Au, Ag, Zn, Pd, Ga, Ni, and Pt) and HCOO
− (Pb, Hg, In, Sn, Cd, and Tl)
[50][51][52][85,86,87].
In 2019, Zhou and collaborators
[53][88] highlighted the need to recycle CO
2 in the atmosphere due to the greenhouse effect and the energy crisis. It addresses electrocatalytic CO
2 reduction as a viable solution but highlights the challenge of developing electrocatalysts with high activity, selectivity, and durability for this reaction. Explores recent advances in nanostructures of different dimensions as promising catalysts to accelerate CO
2 conversion, discussing the challenges and prospects for achieving high efficiency in this process.
Moreover, in 2020, Tang and collaborators
[54][89] discussed the carbon dioxide reduction electrochemistry along transition metals, addressing a complex network of reactions. The
res
earchtudy combines experimental observations from the literature with theoretical analysis to explain that not all intermediates in CO
2 reduction are formed by direct protonation steps. A selectivity map for two-electron products (carbon monoxide and formate) on pure metal surfaces is derived, using only the CO and OH binding energies as descriptors. The analysis rationalizes the experimentally observed product distributions in CO
2RE in pure metal systems, highlighting the need for additional descriptors for screening materials in CO
2 reduction and the importance of considering the competition in the elementary steps of the hydrogen evolution reaction.
Johnson and collaborators
[55][90] highlighted the significant role of carbon dioxide in global warming, with the burning of fossil fuels being the main source of pollution. The capture and reduction of CO
2 for the production of valuable chemicals using renewable energy sources is an important area of research. Catalysts, support structures, and electrolytes are key factors affecting the electrochemistry of CO
2 reduction for the production of value-added chemicals and fuels. The re
svie
archw covers the field of CO
2RE electrocatalysis, focusing on non-precious transition metal-based catalysts and highlighting design, synthesis, characterization, and mechanisms. Advanced catalyst design, including two-dimensional metal carbide and nitride materials, and state-of-the-art in situ/operando spectroelectrochemical techniques are emphasized. The text concludes by highlighting the remaining challenges and perspectives for future research and opportunities.
In 2022, Jiang and collaborators
[56][91] highlighted the electrochemistry of CO reduction as a promising approach to address the energy crisis and reduce carbon emissions. Cu-based electrocatalysts have been considered to generate hydrocarbons and alcohols in CO
2RE, but face challenges of high initial potential and low selectivity. The
res
earchtudy proposes a series of Cu-based single-atom alloy catalysts (SAACs), TM1/Cu (111), designed by isolated doping of transition metal (TM) atoms on the Cu (111) surface. TM1/Cu (111) demonstrated, theoretically, greater stability and efficiency in the hydrogenation of CO
2, avoiding hydrogen evolution. Theoretical calculations suggest that the initial hydrogenation of CO
2 in SAACs would form the *CO intermediate, which could be subsequently hydrogenated to produce methane. The bond angle of adsorbed *CO
2 and the binding energy of *OH were identified as important descriptors of the activity and activation capacity of TM1/Cu (111) in CO
2RE. It is speculated that V/Cu (111) may present the best activity and selectivity among all TM1/Cu doped with 3d-TM (111). The
res
earchtudy provides rational guidance for the efficient design of new single-atom catalysts for CO
2RE.
Clark and collaborators
[57][92] address electrosynthesis, such as CO
2 reduction, which involves the formation of dipolar and polarizable transition states during the rate determination step. Highlights the need for systematic and independent control of surface reactivity and electric field strength to accelerate the discovery of highly active electrocatalysts. The
res
earchtudy shows that intermetallic alloys allow independent control over the d-band energetics and work function by varying the alloy composition and the identity of the oxophilic constituent. Identifies intermetallic phases with the potential for greater intrinsic activity in CO reduction compared to conventional Cu-based electrocatalysts. However, it highlights the propensity of these alloys to segregate in the air as a significant challenge for investigating their electrocatalytic activity.