Rocahepevirus ratti as Cause of Acute Hepatitis Worldwide

Rocahepevirus ratti as Cause of Acute Hepatitis Worldwide: Comparison

Please note this is a comparison between Version 1 by Gabriel Reina and Version 2 by Lindsay Dong.

The hepatitis E virus (HEV) is a widespread human infection that causes mainly acute infection and can evolve to a chronic manifestation in immunocompromised individuals. In addition to the common strains of hepatitis E virus (HEV-A), known as Paslahepevirus balayani, pathogenic to humans, a genetically highly divergent rat origin hepevirus (RHEV) can cause hepatitis possessing a potential risk of cross-species infection and zoonotic transmission. Rocahepevirus ratti, formerly known as Orthohepevirus C, is a single-stranded RNA virus, recently reassigned to Rocahepevirus genus in the Hepeviridae family, including genotypes C1 and C2.

hepatitis E
Rocahepevirus ratti
Orthohepevirus C

1. Introduction

The hepatitis E virus (HEV) is one of the leading causes of hepatitis worldwide. Generally, is presented as an acute infection that improves without treatment after several weeks. Clinical course includes asymptomatic infection, mild-to-moderate liver dysfunction, or fulminant hepatitis. Chronic infections have been reported among immunocompromised individuals like solid organ transplant recipients [1].

The HEV is a single-stranded RNA virus belonging to the Hepeviridae family, which included three genera until 2022: Orthohepevirus (infecting mammalian species), Orthohepevirinae (infecting unclassified species), and Piscihepevirus (infecting fish species). Orthohepevirus C (rat hepatitis E virus) also referred as HEV-C, was classified as a member of the Orthohepevirus genus within the Hepeviridae family, sharing a close genetic relationship with other hepatitis E viruses, including HEV-A, HEV-B, and HEV-D (Figure 1) ^[2][3][2,3].

Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of members of the family Hepeviridae, subfamily Orthohepevirinae (ORF1 polyprotein residues 1–450) (https://ictv.global/report/chapter/hepeviridae/hepeviridae, accessed on 31 October 2023).

The current nomenclature for the former Orthohepevirus C is Rocahepevirus ratti (RHEV), as the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) has reclassified the Orthohepevirus genus. The other virus pathogen of the Hepeviridae family that infects humans is the Paslahepevirus balayani, previously known as Orthohepevirus A (HEV-A). HEV-A virus exhibits eight genotypes (1–8) and it is primarily transmitted through the fecal-oral route, associated with contaminated water or food, and mainly prevalent in regions with inadequate hygiene practice. While Paslahepevirus balayani is recognized as the causative agent of hepatitis E in humans, Rocahepevirus ratti represents an emerging zoonotic pathogen primarily infecting rats and other rodent species, this infectious agent can potentially infect humans increasing the concern in terms of public health ^[4][5][4,5].

The genomic sequence analysis of RHEV has revealed new cases involving zoonotic transmission, as rodents are susceptible to genotype 1 (HEV-C1) infection [6]. This virus is primarily associated with rat populations, which can shed the agent in their feces and urine when infected, leading to environmental contamination. The actual transmission route for human infection is unknown, but different risk factors have been proposed, such as exposure to contaminated environments, contact with infected animals, or the consumption of contaminated food or water [7].

2. Phylogenetic Analysis and Genomic Sequence

The Hepeviridae family is divided into two subfamilies: Orthohepevirinae, divided into four genera: Paslahepevirus (former Orthohepevirus A) the main cause of hepatitis E, which embraces eight different genotypes affecting a variety of species including humans, pigs, wild boar, deer, rabbits, and camels [7]; Rocahepevirus (previous Orthohepevirus C) which infects the Rodentia and Soricomorpha order (rats and ferrets), as well as Carnivora; Chirohepevirus (old Orthohepevirus D) which infects Chiroptera order (bats); and Avihepevirus (previous Orthohepevirus B) which infects and circulates in the avian order (birds); the second subfamily is Parahepevirinae containing one single genus, Piscihepevirus ^[8][9]. RHEV and HEV-A are two highly divergent viruses, their genomes only share 50–60% genomic identity, differing on their transmission and pathogenicity, with RHEV infections being related to less severe disease outcomes [7]. The HEV virus presents eight main genotypes within the Paslahepevirus genus [4]. Genotypes 1 and 2 transmission is through the consumption of contaminated water by feces, mainly in developing countries. This situation has triggered zoonotic transmission by these genotypes, due to the contamination of the environment with the pathogen from animal feces or urine. As well as the transmission through the ingestion of raw or undercooked meat of the infected animal host, which predominates in genotypes 3 to 8 ^[5][6][5,6]. Within the RHEV, there are two main genotypes, HEV-C1 and HEV-C2, showing a divergence of 44%. In addition, two extra tentative genotypes (C3 and C4) have been proposed within RHEV species [3]. According to the genomic sequence analysis, the HEV-A virus possesses a single- stranded RNA genome positive-sense approximately 7.2 kb in length. The genome encodes three open reading frames (ORFs) which participate in the viral replication and transcription ^[8][9][9,10]. ORF1 contains a large polyprotein that is processed into several non- structural proteins, including RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), helicase, and protease. ORF2 codifies a protein for the viral capsid, while ORF3 produces a minor protein responsible for the virion assembly and release. The genomic structure of HEV-A resembles other hepeviruses, like the RHEV ^[10][11]. Recent studies have identified a new open reading frame (ORF4), located within the ORF1 region of the HEV-A genome. This ORF4 encodes a 20 kDa protein with 139–158 amino acids span. Despite its discovery, the role of the ORF4 in the HEV-A or RHEV viral replication and pathogenesis remain unclear ^[11][12]. Investigating the ORFs of the RHEV virus is crucial to understand the genetic structure of the virus, the pathogenesis, replication, transcription and translation mechanisms, and how they adapt into the host to develop more effective strategies against this pathogen ^[10][11].

3. Epidemiology and Geographical Distribution

3.1. Human Infections Associated with Rocahepevirus ratti

At this moment, up to 21 cases of HEV-C1 infection have been reported in humans through RNA detection in different samples. This data includes sixteen patients in Hong Kong, three patients in Spain, one patient in Central Africa, and one patient in France. RHEV initial detection occurred in rats from Germany and Vietnam [3], but no human cases have been found in Germany ^[12][15] or Hungary ^[13][16] after investigation. In Spain, a comprehensive study conducted by Rivero-Juarez et al. revealed the presence of Rocahepevirus ratti infection in three human patients. In China, particularly in Hong Kong, three studies have been carried out to investigate the role of Rocahepevirus ratti. The most recent of these studies was published in 2022 and focused on a cohort of 53 patients from the Microbiology Department of Queen Mary Hospital. The study was conducted between 1 August 2019 and 31 December 2020, and the results indicated a total of eight cases with positive RNA HEV-C1 ^[14][17]. The study was a continuation of a prior investigation, which analyzed 2201 sera from patients with liver function abnormalities between 1 January 2017 and 31 July 2019 (group 1), and 659 cases in a second group, composed of transplant recipients and patients with solid organ neoplasms, hematologic neoplasms, autoimmune disorders, and other immunosuppressive conditions between 1 January 2019 and 30 June 2019 (group 2). The previous study identified six cases of HEV-C1 RNA positivity in group 1 and one case in group 2, leading to a total of seven cases ^[15][18]. Notably, the first confirmed human infection caused by RHEV, originating from rats, was identified in Hong Kong in 2017. The study examined a patient who was Anti-HEV IgG positive and had borderline Anti-HEV IgM results. This patient was found to have persistent Hepatitis E after receiving a liver transplant. For this research, a total of 518 solid organ transplant recipients, including kidney, liver, lung, and heart transplants, were evaluated. These recipients exhibited persistent hepatitis, defined as an elevation of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) greater than 1.5 times the upper limit of the reference level for a continuous period of more than six weeks, from 1 January 2014, or the date of transplant (whichever was later) until 31 December 2017 ^[16][19]. Recent studies have been conducted, revealing also the transmission of RHEV to humans in Europe. A recent study, conducted in Spain, examined 267 cases and evaluated two cohorts: one comprising 169 patients without HEV infection, and the other consisting of 98 patients diagnosed of HEV infection (either HEV RNA or HEV-IgM positive). In the first cohort, two cases of HEV-C1 RNA-positive samples were detected, whereas one case was found in the second cohort (HEV-IgM(+)). Therefore, the first RHEV recorded cases in Europe were these three human infections identified in Spain [4]. A fourth European case was discovered in France thanks to metagenomics testing, revealing the presence of RHEV in liver/blood samples of a male who developed cirrhosis after resolving HBV infection (loss of HBsAg and non detectable DNA).

3.2. Animal Infections Associated with Rocahepevirus ratti

Regarding the discovery and dissemination of RHEV on a global scale, including regions such as Europe, Asia, America, and Africa, the Table 14 provides comprehensive data concerning the prevalence of cases, categorized by continents and individual countries.

Table 14.

Global data of animal infections associated with

Rocahepevirus ratti

(

= 489).

Continent	Asia	n	Europe	n	America	n	Africa	n
	China	159	Germany	42	USA	37	Kenya	1
	Indonesia	117	Czech Republic	20	Canada	21
	Japan	14	Lithuania	9	Brazil	7
	Vietnam	5	Romania	9
			Belgium	8
			Great Britain	8
			Hungary	7
			France	5
Country RHEV infections			Austria	4
			Spain	4
			Switzerland	4
			Denmark	3
			Greece	2
			Netherlands	2
			Italy	1
Total infections		295		128		65		1

Until 2023, a cumulative total of 489 infections have been reported in different animals (mainly rodents), notably revealing Asia as the continent with the highest incidence of infected animals, accounting for a total of 295 documented instances. China emerges as the country with the highest reported cases within the Asian region. Europe, on the other hand, stands as the second-highest affected continent, with a combined total of 128 confirmed cases distributed across 15 different countries. In America, the presence of RHEV has only been detected in the United States, Canada, and Brazil, providing a combined total of 65 reported infections. In Africa, a solitary case has been identified, specifically in Kenya (Table 14). The global map in Figure 24 corresponds to the data presented in Table 14, offering a comprehensive review of the results pertaining the different countries. The data are differentiated by RHEV animal infections, and the colored regions on the map represent the locations where detected animal infections have been reported.

Figure 24. Map of animal infections caused by Rocahepevirus ratti in different countries. The darker the color, the greater the number of infections.

3.3. Investigation of Rocahepevirus ratti in Wastewater Systems

Sewage surveillance is recognized as a powerful tool to gather information on the epidemiology of infectious diseases in the served population. The presence of RHEV has been explored in sewage treatment plants at different locations in Sweden, Italy, and Spain, allowing to get a better view of its epidemiology.

In Gothenburg (Sweden), a comprehensive study monitored influent and effluent wastewater for enteric viruses by qPCR, at the Rya treatment plant over a year. Seasonal variations in viral concentrations were observed in incoming wastewater, correlating with the number of diagnosed patients. Different HEV strains previously identified in drinking water, including two novel strains similar to those infecting rats and humans, were identified in the effluents ^[17][28]

Another study in Abruzzo (Italy), detected viral RNA of RHEV in 43.9% of sewage collected from 14 wastewater treatment plants, by using broadly reactive primers for hepevirus. These strains exhibited genetic variability and a clear geographic and wastewater treatment plant-related pattern. The study suggested that RHEV was a significant component of wastewater microbiota in the region ^[18][29]

Finally, a longitudinal study was carried out in Cordoba (southern Spain) from 2021 to 2023 using samples from patients with acute hepatitis, specimens from rodents, and wastewater to evaluate the correlation with human cases. The results showed that while RHEV was detected in almost all wastewater samples, there was no correlation between clinical cases and wastewater detection for both HEV and RHEV ^[19][30]

These studies highlight the importance of monitoring wastewater for RHEV. Untreated wastewater collects viruses excreted by both humans and synanthropic animals, including rodents, thereby providing a comprehensive overview of the viral strains circulating. Despite the reduction in viral concentrations during wastewater treatment, the presence of novel strains concerns the potential public health impact.

4. Pathogenesis and Diagnosis

Rocahepevirus ratti, like Paslahepevirus balayani, can cause acute hepatitis, chronic hepatitis, and subclinical infection. HEV-C1 infections are self-limiting and less severe than HEV-A infections, characterized by lower mean peak ALT and bilirubin levels in those with intact immunity. In general, the criteria for inclusion in these investigations to identify RHEV infection include clinical and biological manifestations consistent with acute or chronic hepatitis, as well as an ALT level significantly greater than the upper limit of normal. Infections in immunocompromised individuals, on the other hand, are challenging, with 50% of HEV-C1 infections progressing to persistence, according to research by S. Sridhar et al. ^[15][18]. This may be due to the fact that immunocompromised people might be more vulnerable to HEV-C1 infections. Not only was the viral pathogenicity examined, but meningoencephalitis was detected as a sequela in an immunocompromised patient after the hepatitis had entirely cured. Therefore, the correlation between RHEV infection and neurological symptoms must be studied. Subclinical HEV-C1 infection, without changes in hepatic function tests or clinical symptoms, is concerning over the safety of blood transfusions because the virus can be transmitted through contaminated blood samples due to the high viral load of HEV-C1 in plasma. RHEV’s viral tropism is oriented towards the liver, with a special affinity for liver cells. Virus replication occurs there, leading to liver damage and the release of liver enzymes into the blood, resulting in acute and chronic hepatitis in humans and animals. Recognizing the pathogenicity is crucial for the development of therapies for the prevention and treatment of hepatitis caused by this virus ^[15][18]. Ferrets and rats have been proposed as candidate animal models to study RHEV pathogenesis. Ferrets exhibit three patterns of infection: subclinical infection, acute hepatitis, and persistent infection ^[20][56]. Induced infections of RHEV on immunosuppressed rats have shown the effect of high-dose immunosuppression to induce chronic hepatitis and viral load suppression was observed with ribavirin treatment ^[21][57]. Molecular biology techniques have facilitated the identification of RHEV RNA in liver, feces, and blood samples obtained from various animal and human species. Such techniques include RT-PCR amplification, Sanger DNA sequencing, and metagenomic tests involving next generation sequencing. The combination of these methods, along with detailed phylogenetic and sequence evaluations, have allowed sequencing of RHEV genomes [4]. The first human RHEV infection was detected in a patient with chronic hepatitis, and this case was validated by RT-PCR and sequencing of plasma, stool, saliva, and liver tissue samples. The most accurate method for detecting Rocahepevirus ratti infection is the RT-PCR method by which viral genomic RNA can be identified. The sensitivity of the method depends on the design and selection of specific primers. The molecular diagnosis of HEV-A and RHEV may be challenging as several assays have shown low sensitivity for endemic genotypes in Europe and the number of genotypes/subtypes described is increasing, therefore, without an evaluation, their sensitivity in this context is unknown. Primers used to detect human HEV may not be able to recognize the RHEV genome in patient samples, limiting the sensitivity of PCR, and only the use of specific primers for RHEV has allowed its detection in different samples. It is important to note that the genetic diversity of HEV-C1 is still unclear, which could also limit the sensitivity of the techniques ^[16][19].

5. Conclusions

An increasing number of cases of animals and humans infected with Rocahepevirus ratti are being detected. Some species of rats have been confirmed as natural reservoirs of RHEV, and they are considered a source of zoonotic infection. It is likely that more cases will be discovered as detection techniques improve. Understanding the virus evolution and diffusion is essential for the development of successful prevention and control measures, treatments, and vaccines. The information obtained from the phylogenetic analysis and genomic sequencing will help researchers track the development of new strains, contributing to epidemiological distribution maps. In addition, this information can also be used to develop diagnostic tests to accurately detect the virus in collected samples and evolve in the discovery of a more precise pathogenesis. These tests are needed to assist healthcare professionals in diagnosing RHEV infections and preventing the spread of the virus. This is a public health concern because it is a new pathogen that can be transmitted to other species and even to humans. Further research is needed to determine the exact route of transmission of the virus to humans, as it remains unknown.