Thermoelectric Materials: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Rita Xu and Version 1 by Matteo d'Angelo.

Solid-state energy conversion has been established as one of the most promising solutions to address the issues related to conventional energy generation. Thermoelectric materials allow direct energy conversion without moving parts and being deprived of greenhouse gases emission, employing lightweight and quiet devices.

  • thermoelectricity
  • bismuth telluride
  • films

1. Introduction

The worldwide energy and pollution crisis is forcing the industry to innovate in sustainable directions: new ways to harvest and save energy are necessary [1][2][3]. Thermoelectric generators (TEGs) and coolers (TECs) are technological solutions which can address such issues. The operating principle of thermoelectric materials (TEMs) is based on the Seebeck effect, discovered as a thermomagnetic effect by Seebeck in 1821, and correctly addressed as a thermoelectric effect by Oersted in 1825 [4][5]. A thermoelectric (TE) generator is used to convert thermal energy into electrical energy. When a temperature gradient (ΔT) is applied to the opposite ends of a TE device, power is generated according to this temperature difference: the power generated therefore increases linearly with ΔT [6][7][8]. Oppositely, a thermoelectric cooler can generate a temperature gradient between two opposite ends when a current passes through the material from the appropriate pins of the thermoelements. In the first case, converted heat is referred to as the Seebeck effect. In the second case, the phenomenon is called the Peltier effect [1][2][9].
The disruptive impact of solid-state thermoelectric generators on the world is related to the possibility of directly converting waste heat into electrical energy; currently, research is therefore focusing on these materials thanks to the coupling of sustainable energy production and waste energy re-utilization. The lack of moving parts makes the devices relatively scalable, greenhouse gas emission-free, lightweight, and quiet; furthermore, thanks to these characteristics, thermoelectric devices are extremely reliable. Since these electricity generators do not depend on the nature of the consumable heat, the fields of application are quite numerous and diverse. The five main categories in which thermoelectric generators are used are: medical and wearable devices (e.g., wristband energy harvesters), microelectronics (e.g., wireless sensor networks nodes), electronics (e.g., reutilization of waste heat for energy harvesting), automotive (e.g., re-utilization of engine waste heat to power up devices installed on the vehicle), and aerospace (e.g., energy generation in extreme conditions, such as outer space) [10][11][12][13][14]. TEGs fit these applications because of their reliability, which is the main concern in such cases, not efficiency. Furthermore, in high tech applications such as aerospace and microelectronics, costs are of secondary concern, enabling even more TE material utilization [15][16][17][18]. The last 3 years of state-of-the-art, best performing TE materials (ZT) are summarized in Figure 1. Among the materials cited, those showing the best performance (ZT ≥ 2.4) are GeTe, PbTe, SbSe, and Cu2Se; however, these values did not exhibit high reproducibility, remaining laboratory results never applied in in situ applications. The ZTmax values of similar materials of the years before 2021 are charted in the diagram in the work of Shin et al [18].
Energies 16 06409 g001[19]
Figure 1. ZT values for state-of-the-art thermoelectric materials in the last 3 years. The image was created summarizing the ZT values at room temperature of the materials tested in the bibliography of thermoelectrics in the respective years. Original image.
ZT values for state-of-the-art thermoelectric materials in the last 3 years. The image was created summarizing the ZT values at room temperature of the materials tested in the bibliography of thermoelectrics in the respective years.
Recent studies about the market of TEMs revealed that in 2019, bismuth telluride accounted for the 66% of the total thermoelectric market. This material is chosen by most companies because today’s commercial applications are close to room temperature, where the highest figure of merit is claimed by Bi2Te3 and its alloys (it can function up to 600 K). Interestingly, the second material in this classification is lead telluride (PbTe) which is used at higher temperatures than bismuth telluride (up to 900 K). Furthermore, PbTe is a chalcogenide as well, indicating the potential of this material class. Said studies also highlighted that the thermoelectric market is predicted to increase from the 51.9 million USD of 2019 to the 96.2 million USD of 2027, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.0% [20]. This demand derives from the increasing applications in industrial, automotive, healthcare, microelectronics, and aerospace. The advantages of using these materials are related to energy saving (e.g., in many applications conventional batteries could be substituted by these devices, for instance thermo-powered security systems in apartments), the reuse of waste heat (e.g., the heat dispersed by a vehicle engine can be used to power up different accessories of the car), and reducing greenhouse gases emissions, non-renewable sources, and fossil fuel utilization [15][16][18].  Up to 2027, different growth rates have been forecast for the application fields of TEMs (industrial, automotive, electric and electronics, healthcare, and others). Automotive and electric and electronics are the fields where the market is growing the fastest; the value of CAGR is around 9.7% for both, differently from the other fields where it is lower [20]. However, as can be seen from the prices summed up in Figure 1, the high production costs of these devices could lower TEMs’ market growth. An example is in photovoltaic energy generation; a 1000 W photovoltaic panel currently costs less than 3000 USD, whereas a 125 W TEG (where the energy source is sun irradiation) costs 1200 USD. The use of TEMs for such an application has wide potential because when there is no sunlight, an in-house heat source can be used to re-charge the generator. However, the high production prices are not enabling this solution yet [21]. For example, relatively high efficiency values were reached using an n-type (Bi-Te-Se, PbTe) and a p-type (Bi-Te-Sb) for the TEG; however, as summed up in Figure 1, the ZTmax/cost effectiveness is low (0.9 for Bi-Te-Sb and Bi-Te-Se alloys and 1.2 for PbTe), slowing the unveiling on the market [18][21][22][23]. The main research goal is in fact to achieve relatively high efficiency values with scalable processes, delivering TE devices to markets where price is a main concern [21][22][24]. The achievement of high ZT values is related to high values of electrical conductivity and low values of thermal conductivity [14][25][26][27]. 

2. Commercial tThermoelectric mModules

TE modules are devices used to exploit thermoelectric phenomena for refrigeration or power generation. These objects consist of semiconductor couples electrically in series

 and thermally in parallel while being positioned between two ceramic substrates (usually made of alumina, Al2O3, silica, SiO2, or beryllium oxide, BeO); the thermocouples are connected through metal contacts (commercially available products employ thick films of copper Cu between the leg ends and the substrate, which are called ‘interconnects’). Furthermore, an anti-diffusion layer (often nickel, Ni, in one layer or silver, Ag, and tin, Sn, in two stacked layers) is soldered on every element to avoid the phenomenon when the module operates at high temperatures [15][16].  More specifically, thermoelectric couples are installed as alternating n- and p-doped semiconducting legs, where the electrons in

 the n-type legs move like the holes in the p-type legs with heat [14][15].  Doping a semiconductor corresponds to introducing impurities in the material to add an extra electron or a

 hole. In the conventional case of silicon, p-doping means introducing in the semiconductor 3-valent dopants (e.g., boron) which can catch an outer electron, generating a hole in

 the material. Oppositely, n-doping means inserting in the semiconductor 5-valent dopants (e.g., phosphorus) which can lose an outer electron, donating an extra electron to the material. Therefore, a p-dopant is an electron acceptor, and an n-dopant is an electron donor [27][28][29].

 A single and generic thermoelectric couple is represented in Figure 2.Figure 2 Representation of a single and generic thermoelectric couple. The blue and the yellow prisms are the p-type and n-type semiconductors, respectively. The light brown components are the contact metals, and the gray and brown elements are the soldered anti-diffusion layers. Finally, the upper plates are the ceramic substrates. Reprinted with permission [15] Figure 2 Representation of a single and generic thermoelectric couple. The blue and the yellow prisms are the p-type and n-type semiconductors, respectively. The light brown components are the contact metals, and the gray and brown elements are the soldered anti-diffusion layers. Finally, the upper plates are the ceramic substrates. Reprinted with permission[30].

References

  1. Mamur, H.; Bhuiyan, M.R.A.; Korkmaz, F.; Nil, M. A Review on Bismuth Telluride (Bi2Te3) Nanostructure for Thermoelectric Applications.. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 82, 4159.
  2. Sajid, M.; Hassan, I.; Rahman, A. An Overview of Cooling of Thermoelectric Devices.. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 78, 15.
  3. Gupta, M. Review on Heat Recovery Unit with Thermoelectric Generators.. Power 2014, 4, 2021.
  4. Narducci, M.; Castellero, D.; Fanciulli, A.; Puglia, C.; Gobbato, F.; Bennetti, P. Materiali Termoelettrici e Tecnologie per Il Recupero di Calore Disperso, in Materiali Termoelettrici e Tecnologie per Il Recupero di Calore Disperso-Associazione Italiana Metallurigia (AIM) (2021), p. 2021. Available online: https://www.aimnet.it/manifestazione.php?id=698&idc= (accessed on 13 June2023).
  5. Polozine, A.; Sirotinskaya, S.; Schaeffer, L. History of Development of Thermoelectric Materials for Electric Power Generation and Criteria of Their Quality.. Mater. Res. 2014, 17, 1260.
  6. Siddique, A.R.M.; Mahmud, S.; Van Heyst, B. A Review of the State of the Science on Wearable Thermoelectric Power Generators (TEGs) and Their Existing Challenges.. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 73, 730.
  7. Burmester, D.; Rayudu, R.; Seah, W.; Akinyele, D. A Review of Nanogrid Topologies and Technologies.. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 67, 760.
  8. Schwall, M.; Balke, B. Phase separation as a key to a thermoelectric high efficiency.. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 15, 1868-1872.
  9. Champier, D. Thermoelectric generators: A review of applications.. Energy Convers. Manag. 2017, 140, 167-181.
  10. Mamur, H.; Ahiska, R. Application of a DC-DC Boost Converter with Maximum Power Point Tracking for Low Power Thermoelectric Generators.. Energy Convers. Manag. 2015, 97, 265.
  11. Rausch, E.; Balke, B.; Deschauer, T.; Ouardi, S.; Felser, C. Charge Carrier Concentration Optimization of Thermoelectric P-Type Half-Heusler Compounds.. APL Mater. 2015, 3, 041516.
  12. Huen, P.; Daoud, W.A. Advances in Hybrid Solar Photovoltaic and Thermoelectric Generators.. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 72, 1295.
  13. Hossain, S.; Li, T.; Yu, Y.; Yong, J.; Bahk, J.-H. Skafidas, E. Recent advances in printable thermoelectric devices: Materials, printing techniques, and applications.. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 8421-8434.
  14. Wei, J.; Yang, L.; Ma, Z.; Song, P.; Zhang, M.; Ma, J.; Yang, F.; Wang, X. Review of current high-ZT thermoelectric materials.. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 12642-12704.
  15. Jaziri, N.; Boughamoura, A.; Müller, J.; Mezghani, B.; Tounsi, F.; Ismail, M. A Comprehensive Review of Thermoelectric Generators: Technologies and Common Applications.. Energy Rep. 2020, 6, 264.
  16. Rowe, D.M.. Thermoelectrics and Its Energy Harvesting; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012; pp. 50 - 75.
  17. Rowe, D.M.. Thermoelectrics Handbook Macro to Nano; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006; pp. 104 - 115.
  18. Shi, X.L.; Zou, J.; Chen, Z.G. Advanced Thermoelectric Design: From Materials and Structures to Devices.. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 7399.
  19. Liu, D.W.; Li, J.F.; Chen, C.; Zhang, B.P.; Li, L. Fabrication and Evaluation of Microscale Thermoelectric Modules of Bi2Te3-Based Alloys.. J. Micromechanics Microengineering 2010, 20, 125031.
  20. Thermoelectric Materials Market By Product Type, By Distribution Channel, By Application, Forecasts to 2027. . Emergen Research. Retrieved 2023-9-13
  21. Li, K.; Garrison, G.; Zhu, Y.; Horne, R.; Petty, S. Cost Estimation of Thermoelectric Generators, 46th Work.. Geotherm. Reserv. Eng. 2021, 1, 3-5.
  22. Karthick, K.; Suresh, S.; Hussain, M.M.M.; Ali, H.M.; Kumar C.S. Evaluation of solar thermal system configurations for thermoelectric generator applications: A critical review. . Sol. Energy 2019, 188, 111-142.
  23. Ahiska, R.; Dislitas, S.; Omer, G. A new method and computer-controlled system for measuring the time constant of real thermoelectric modules.. Energy Convers. Manag. 2012, 53, 314-321.
  24. Harman, T.C.; Taylor, P.J.; Walsh, M.P.; LaForge, B.E. Quantum Dot Superlattice Thermoelectric Materials and Devices.. Science 2002, 297, 2229.
  25. Joshi, G.; He, R.; Engber, M.; Samsonidze, G.; Pantha, T.; Dahal, E.; Dahal, K.; Yang, J.; Lan, Y.; Kozinsky, B.; et al. NbFeSb-Based p-Type Half-Heuslers for Power Generation Applications.. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 4070.
  26. Siouane, S.; Jovanović, S.; Poure, P. Fully Electrical Modeling of Thermoelectric Generators with Contact Thermal Resistance Under Different Operating Conditions.. J. Electron. Mater. 2017, 46, 40.
  27. Shi, Y.; Sturm, C.; Kleinke, H. Chalcogenides as thermoelectric materials.. J. Solid State Chem. 2019, 270, 273-279.
  28. Ashalley, E.; Chen, H.; Tong, X.; Li, H.; Wang, Z.M. Bismuth telluride nanostructures: Preparation, thermoelectric properties and topological insulating effect.. Front. Mater. Sci. 2015, 9, 103-125.
  29. Goldsmid, H.J. Bismuth Telluride and Its Alloys as Materials for Thermoelectric Generation.. Materials 2014, 7, 2577-2592.
  30. He, R.; Schierning, G.; Nielsch, K. Thermoelectric Devices: A Review of Devices, Architectures, and Contact Optimization.. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2018, 3, 1700256.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback