Antimicrobial Resistance with Infectious Diseases during Hajj: Comparison
Please note this is a comparison between Version 1 by Abdul Haseeb and Version 2 by Jason Zhu.

Hajj pilgrimage is a large mass gathering global event that may facilitate the spread and emergence of various infectious diseases as well as antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in a local and global scenario. Planning and preparing for these public health issues is a challenging and complex process for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) health authorities. Despite multiple efforts for the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases through longtime funding in education and medical care, the prevalence of infectious disease is still high among Hajj pilgrims. The commonly observed infectious diseases during Hajj include respiratory tract infections (influenza and pneumonia), urinary tract infections and skin infections that may necessitate the use of antimicrobials. Beta-lactams are used as a first-line treatment for hospital acquired infections as well as community acquired infections due to their broad-spectrum activity. However, most of the bacterial isolates such as Staphylococcus spp., Pseudomonas spp. and E. coli are resistant to beta-lactams. Irrational use of antimicrobials, lack of infection prevention practices and suboptimal healthcare access further exacerbate the risk of spreading AMR among Hajj pilgrims.

  • antimicrobial resistance
  • Hajj pilgrims
  • COVID-19

1. Introduction

An appreciable number of pilgrims gather from across the world to attend religious events and festivals when they occur [1]. Such gatherings increase the risk of especially communicable diseases that pose challenges to healthcare authorities [2][3][4][2,3,4]. Mass gatherings have been reported to have a considerable impact on an individual’s health and subsequent implications on the host’s country infrastructure and economy [5][6][7][8][5,6,7,8]. These mass gatherings can result in the dissemination of multi-drug resistant (MDR) strains and the spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) on a global scale [3][9][10][11][3,9,10,11]. Intersectoral approaches, public health surveillance and global communication are required to mitigate the risks of emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases [12][13][14][15][16][12,13,14,15,16]. After the H1N1 influenza pandemic, the first virtual international conference was held in Jeddah, KSA, in 2010, where The Lancet Infectious Diseases Series on mass gatherings was introduced. The majority of the national and international medical experts participated in this conference to develop and modify the guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of infectious diseases during mass gathering events [17].
The Hajj is one of the biggest religious events hosted by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) every year. One of the obligatory pillars of Islam, Hajj is a pilgrimage to Makkah which is must for every physically fit, healthy Muslim to perform once in a lifetime if he/she can afford it [18]. It is performed from the 8th to 12th of Dhul-Hujjah, the last month of Islamic calendar. Currently, over three million Muslims travel to Saudi Arabia every year to perform Hajj rituals from almost 184 countries [19]. Over-crowded accommodations make an ideal environment for the exacerbation of communicable diseases, many of which are preventable if proper precautionary measures are taken [20]. Pilgrims are at potential risk of acquiring communicable diseases via contaminated food or water, person-to-person contact and vector-borne and respiratory transmission of viruses [4][17][21][22][23][4,17,21,22,23].
Antimicrobial resistant pathogens are currently prevalent in KSA [24][25][26][24,25,26]. Hajj pilgrims therefore face the potential risk of acquiring or transmitting these pathogens during their stay in KSA and subsequently spread these pathogens on their return home. A systematic review reported the prevalence and increasing trend of resistant pathogens during Hajj which include methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), 3GC-Enterobacteriaceae, colistin-resistant bacteria and imipenem-resistant bacteria [27]. Several studies conducted between 2002 and 2012 documented that the prevalence of MRSA varied significantly across different countries ranging from 0.06% to 94% [27][28][29][27,28,29].

2. Pattern and Prevalence of Infectious Diseases during Hajj

Possible infectious disease patterns during the Hajj pilgrimage include endemic, exported and imported diseases [30][41]. Inappropriate sanitary facilities, shared shelters, poor hygiene and lack of portable water enhance the transmission of infectious microorganisms. These combined factors have resulted in multiple communicable diseases among pilgrims during Hajj as well as after their return to their home countries [30][31][41,42]. The presence of a large number of pilgrims from different regions of the world in a gathering can increase the risk of spreading infectious diseases across international borders including resistant strains [32][43]. Climate conditions and air pollution in Makkah also play an important role in the transmission of infectious diseases [33][44]. Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) have been the predominant health problem among Hajj pilgrims over the past 15 years [34][45]. The most common pathogens for RTIs are Klebsiella pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Coronavirus, Adenovirus, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae [35][36][46,47]. According to one estimate, approximately 90% of Hajj pilgrims develop at least one respiratory illness before their return home [37][48]. Influenza has been the most common respiratory illness among Hajj pilgrims, estimated to be 24,000 cases per year [38][49]. Pneumonia has been observed as the most common life-threatening respiratory illness among pilgrims attending Mina healthcare centers [39][50] and the leading cause of hospital admissions particularly in intensive care units (ICUs) [40][51]. Among viral infections, herpes simplex virus (HSV) and adenovirus infections are the most commonly reported. The recent COVID-19 pandemic has also been a serious public health issue globally including in the KSA [41][42][52,53]. The KSA took all precautionary measures to prevent the spread COVID-19 based on typical effective public health measures and was declared COVID-19-free until March 2nd, 2020, when the first COVID-19 case was reported as an Iranian pilgrim [43][44][54,55]. Since then, KSA, the host country of annual Hajj pilgrimage, started witnessing an increasing trend of COVID-19 cases [45][56]. Moreover, of equal concern, is that tuberculosis (TB) has been reported in three studies [46][47][48][57,58,59]. The spread and emergence of MDR-TB has further complicated the circumstances, leading to unfavorable therapy outcomes and imposing an economic burden on patients as well as healthcare systems [46][49][57,60]. It is challenging to assess the exact prevalence of TB among Hajj pilgrims due to limited comprehensive studies targeting this specific group. Consequently, it is essential that the health authorities in KSA seek to implement strategies in the future to help control TB. These could include enhanced surveillance, diagnostics and treatment programs. Several studies have, as mentioned, also recently discussed the transmission and acquisition of AMR during Hajj. Among the resistant strains, New Delhi metallo-B-lactamase, extended-spectrum B-lactamase-producing pathogens, SHV-12-producing Salmonella typhi, CTX-M-producing Escherichia Coli, Streptococcus pneumoniae [30][41] and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have frequently been reported in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries especially in KSA [50][51][61,62].

3. Patterns of Antimicrobial Use among Hajj Pilgrims

Pilgrims come from different regions of the world, including countries where antimicrobials are typically dispensed without a prescription, which contributes to the spread and emergence of resistance [52][53][54][84,85,86]. The purchasing of antimicrobials without a prescription is now less of an issue in KSA following tightening of the regulations and the potential for considerable fines for abuse [55][87]. One of the predominant factors in the dissemination of AMR among Hajj pilgrims is the irrational use of antimicrobials [11][30][11,41]. During the Hajj pilgrimage, both community-acquired and hospital-acquired infections may necessitate the use of antimicrobials. The selection of antimicrobials is determined by the specific type and severity of the infection. Beta-lactams and cephalosporins are commonly used antibiotics for hospital acquired infections which exhibit efficacy against a wide range of bacteria and are frequently utilized as first-line therapy [56][88]. However, glycopeptides, e.g., vancomycin, are increasingly being used for the treatment of serious infections caused by resistant pathogens such as MRSA [57][89]. Similarly, in the case of community-acquired infections, beta-lactams including amoxicillin are the most frequently prescribed antibiotics among outpatients [58][90]. Fluoroquinolones are also often prescribed for respiratory tract infections, including CAP as a first-line treatment [59][91]. Moreover, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) and macrolides are also utilized for various infections such as respiratory, urinary and skin infections [60][34]. As reported in multiple studies, 34.9% of Australian pilgrims, 84% of Malaysian pilgrims, 17% of Pakistani pilgrims and 58.5% of Irani pilgrims received antimicrobials during Hajj [61][62][63][64][92,93,94,95]. In another study, 47.6% of French pilgrims received antimicrobials [65][96] where beta-lactams (35.0%), macrolides (11.4%) and cephalosporins (2.3%) were the most common antimicrobials given to French pilgrims [65][96]. A prospective point prevalence study conducted in two referral hospitals in Medina documented that 49.2% of returning Hajj pilgrims were prescribed antibiotics. This included piperacillin-tazobactam (88%), penicillin (20%) and amoxiclav (12%) among Hajj pilgrims [66][97]. Another study reported that Malaysian pilgrims suffering from community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) acquired during the pilgrimage received levofloxacin (44%), azithromycin (40.7%) and cefuroxime (23.1%) on their return home [67][98].

4. Interventions and Recommendations

4.1. Local and International Guidelines and Policies for Infection Prevention and Control

Infection prevention and control is a pivotal component of any healthcare system at a national as well international levels given rising rates of AMR and the implications [68][69][70][37,38,103]. Many infectious diseases as well as outbreaks are preventable if proper measures, including educational sessions regarding disease prevention and self-hygiene combined with prophylactic treatment including vaccines, are adopted by pilgrims before arrival to KSA [71][104]. Collaborative and well-coordinated efforts from all healthcare professionals (HCPs), as well as other key stakeholders and community groups, are needed to reduce future prevalence rates. To help with this, the KSA Ministry of Health provides up-to-date Hajj travel advice and health regulations through international public health organizations such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the WHO and Hajj travel agencies [20]. The WHO has published guidelines entitled “communicable disease alert and response for mass gathering” since June 2008 [72][105], with the recent COVID-19 pandemic focusing minds on key public health measures that can be introduced to stop the spread of infectious diseases. However, in view of continued concerns, it is recommended that Saudi Ministry of Health and public health officials should propose local guidelines for all stakeholders regarding infection prevention and control not for only future Hajj pilgrimages but also other mass gatherings.

4.2. Restricting the Number of Hajj Pilgrims

The Saudi mitigation plan appears to have successfully limited the spread of COVID-19 in KSA as well as contributed to global health security [73][106]. In 2020, KSA authorities allowed 1000 pilgrims residing within KSA to perform Hajj with strict compliance with infection control measures and public health protocols [74][107]. No confirmed cases of COVID-19 or notable public heath events were recorded during this Hajj season. On the basis of the successful outcomes from the 2020 Hajj experience, Saudi authorities decided to extend the number to 60,000 pilgrims in 2021, presenting the similar results to 2020’s experience [75][108]. The rate of upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) was 11.6 cases per 100,000 in the recent study compared to 2200 cases per 100,000 in a previous report [73][106]. Furthermore, a notable decrease in the number of non-communicable diseases (68 cases per 100,000) was reported when compared to previous study that showed the prevalence rate of 1600 per 100,000 cases [73][76][106,109]. The appreciable reduction in the cases of particularly URTIs reflects the effectiveness of adopting health policies and public health measures to restrict the number of Hajj pilgrims thereby ensuring their health to perform Hajj as well as reducing the period of Hajj stay alongside strict implementation of social distancing policies [73][77][106,110].

4.3. Provision and Implementation of Adequate Healthcare Services

The KSA government provides over 1000 free healthcare facilities for all pilgrims during Hajj. The services include mass vaccination, outbreak investigation, environmental health services, infectious disease surveillance, mass administration of prophylactic medication and health education [78][30]. Interventions to cope with the dissemination of infectious diseases include non-pharmaceutical and pharmaceutical methods. Non-pharmaceutical methods include surveillance, wearing face masks, hand hygiene, social distancing, travel restrictions and respiratory etiquette, while pharmaceutical approaches include vaccination and the use of antimicrobials [79][80][111,112]. The strategies and policies should be introduced to improve vaccination coverage among all HCWs, and these strategies should be practiced by all healthcare facilities in Saudi Arabia [81][113].

Vaccination

Vaccination is the most effective way to prevent the acquisition and transmission of infectious diseases [82][114]. The WHO has estimated that approximately 2.5 million individuals are prevented from catching various infectious diseases through vaccination every year [83][115]. In addition, vaccines can not only protect individuals from serious disease but also unvaccinated individuals through the concept of herd immunity [84][116]. Moreover, several studies have supported the idea that administration of viral and bacterial vaccines help to control the emergence and spread of AMR [85][86][87][117,118,119]. Vaccine administration and acceptability can be promoted through the implementation of effective strategies including educating HCWs and pilgrims about vaccination as a prerequisite for acquiring a Hajj visa [19]. Such strategies are endorsed by the fact that the prevalence of influenza-like symptoms was lower in vaccinated pilgrims than in unvaccinated pilgrims [88][70]. In view of studies such as these, the Saudi Ministry of Health has recommended influenza and meningococcal vaccination as mandatory for all pilgrims entering KSA for the Hajj to reduce the risk of transmission of RTIs [89][120]. During the current COVID-19 pandemic, the Saudi healthcare authorities has also made COVID-19 vaccination a mandatory requirement for all pilgrims participating in Hajj rituals before leaving for KSA.

Hand Hygiene

Hand hygiene is one of the simple, primary and effective preventive measures recommended by various healthcare organizations for the prevention of cross-contamination of pilgrims especially during pandemics [90][91][121,122]. A survey of Australian and French pilgrims during 2013–2014 reported that 94% and 50% of their pilgrims, respectively, practiced various hand hygiene techniques including washing and sanitizing [19]. Generally, the use of alcoholic sanitizer is one of the essential hand hygiene practices to prevent infectious diseases. However, Muslim pilgrims are denied using them because alcohol is prohibited in Islam [92][123]. This is a concern as compliance with recommended hand hygiene was reported in US (67.2%) and Turkish (57%) pilgrims and was significantly associated with low risk of RTIs [93][94][124,125].

Social Distancing and Contact Avoidance

According to the CDC, social distancing and contact avoidance with people are the best ways to minimize the transmission of infectious diseases [95][126]. During the COVID-19 pandemic, whilst no Hajj pilgrimage was performed in 2020 apart from 1000 KSA residents, in 2021 the Saudi healthcare authorities allowed the return of pilgrims. However, there were restrictions regarding social distancing of approximately 5 feet during prayers in the mosques and holy sites [96][127]. According to multiple surveys conducted among the wider pilgrim community, 48% of Turkish, 73% of Australian, 82% of Arab and 86% of French pilgrims believed that contact avoidance with sick people was a key element that would have reduced the transmission of infections [19].

Face Masks

Proper utilization of face masks has proven an effective preventive strategy to curb the aerosol spread of airborne infectious diseases. The effectiveness of face masks depends on its type, design and quality [97][98][128,129]. A study reported that Malaysian pilgrims used N-95 masks and surgical masks performing Hajj rituals [98][129]. However, the effectiveness of N-95 masks over surgical masks among HCWs from the prevention of communicable diseases is still unknown [99][130]. A meta-analysis study documented that the wearing face masks did not reduce the chances of catching influenza in 2009 [100][131]. Conversely, a systematic review reported that the prevalence of COVID-19, SARS and influenza decreased by 96%, 74% and 45% respectively by wearing facemasks [101][132]. In April 2020, the CDC recommended the use of cloth face masks to curtail community-based transmission [102][133], which should be adhered to for future mass gatherings.

5. Impact of Antibiotic Prescribing Patterns during the COVID-19 Pandemic on AMR

The irrational use of antibiotics during the recent COVID-19 pandemic may result in the emergence of AMR through appreciable over-prescribing across sectors despite limited evidence of bacterial infections or co-infections [11][103][104][105][106][107][108][11,134,135,136,137,138,139]. Usually, a large proportion of Hajj pilgrims consists of older people with multiple chronic comorbidities. Currently, patients with COVID-19 may receive antimicrobials for two main reasons. Firstly, the symptoms of the bacterial infectious disease resemble COVID-19. However, in order to differentiate between viral and bacterial infection, the ratio of CRP (mg/L) to 2–5A synthetase (pmole/dL) × 10 is used as a differential index. The index values in viral infections ranged from 0 to 0.9 and were lower than the values in bacterial infections, which ranged from 3.9 to 50 [109][140]. Diagnostic tests may though not be that effective with detection and can be time-consuming when immediate therapy is required [110][141]. Secondly, patients with COVID-19 may have bacterial co-infections that require antimicrobial therapy; however, this is rare in practice [106][107][108][111][137,138,139,142]. Consequently, comprehensive data are still required to have a better understanding of the occurrence of co-infections and pathogens involved, alongside the impact of underlying patient risk factors. Furthermore, standardized definitions and diagnostic criteria should be used to perform an in-depth analysis of microbiological resistance and antimicrobial usage where diagnostic laboratory infrastructure exists [112][143]. However, in the meantime, guidelines based on the AWaRe Book can be used to guide patient management of infectious diseases based on the balance of risks and benefits to reduce inappropriate prescribing and dispensing of antibiotics [113][114][144,145]. This is especially important in regions where Gram-negative pathogens are resistant to carbapenems. Antimicrobials with less favorable safety profiles such as colistin, a ‘Reserve’ antibiotic, are recommended as empiric therapy for suspected Gram-negative infections [115][146]. This needs to be avoided in the future. Similarly in countries such as Pakistan, ‘Watch’ and ‘Reserve’ antibiotics are being routinely dispensed in the community without a prescription driving up resistance rates [53][85], which is a concern. On the other hand, if antimicrobial treatment is not tailored to local AMR prevalence, patients with co-infections may receive ineffective therapy, which results in increased mortality rates and healthcare costs [111][142]. This situation can be avoided by developing local guidelines based on the AWaRe book and subsequently monitoring antibiotic usage through antimicrobial stewardship programs [116][117][118][147,148,149].
Video Production Service