Mechanisms of Cutaneous irAEs Induced by ICIs: Comparison
Please note this is a comparison between Version 1 by Sebastian Yu and Version 2 by Sirius Huang.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as promising therapeutic options for the treatment of various cancers. These novel treatments effectively target key mediators of immune checkpoint pathways. ICIs primarily consist of monoclonal antibodies that specifically block cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and lymphocyte activation gene 3 protein (LAG-3). Despite the notable efficacy of ICIs in cancer treatment, they can also trigger immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which present as autoimmune-like or inflammatory conditions.

  • immune checkpoint inhibitor
  • immune-related adverse event
  • cutaneous immune-related adverse event
  • anti-CTLA-4 inhibitor
  • anti-PD-1 inhibitor
  • anti-PD-L1 inhibitor
  • anti-LAG-3 inhibitor

1. Introduction

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the management of advanced malignancies over the past decade by offering groundbreaking therapeutic options [1][2][1,2]. Current biologic agents target natural immune checkpoint molecules, including cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) [3][4][3,4], programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) [5][6][5,6], and lymphocyte activation gene 3 protein (LAG-3) [7], to enhance their antitumoral activity. While immune-checkpoint inhibitors hold great promise, their non-specific immunologic activations can give rise to various autoimmune-like or inflammatory diseases known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs) [8][9][8,9]. These adverse events predominantly affect the skin, gastrointestinal tract, liver, and endocrine glands, but they have the potential to involve any organ system [10][11][10,11].
Cutaneous immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are the most common complications associated with ICIs and often present as the initial manifestation. These events usually develop within the first few weeks to months after initiating immunotherapy, but they can occur at any time, even after treatment discontinuation [12]. A wide range of clinical presentations, including morbilliform eruptions, pruritus, lichenoid eruptions, psoriasiform dermatitis, vitiligo, bullous disorders, alopecia, and severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), have been reported [8][10][11][13][14][8,10,11,13,14]. These adverse events can significantly impact patients’ quality of life and may require the discontinuation of treatment. Therefore, early recognition and prompt management of cutaneous irAEs is important to minimize the immunotherapy-related morbidity and to achieve favorable outcomes in cancer patients.

2. Cutaneous Immune-Related Adverse Events

Despite the remarkable therapeutic efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors, their usage can give rise to a wide array of autoimmune and autoinflammatory reactions referred to as irAEs, due to their non-specific activation of the immune system. Among these irAEs, cutaneous irAEs are the most prevalent and often present as the earliest symptoms in patients undergoing immunotherapy. Generally, cutaneous irAEs emerge within weeks to months after initiating treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors, although they can occur at any time, even after discontinuation of treatment [12]. Most cutaneous toxicities are mild to moderate in severity (CTCAE grades 1–2) and typically resolve spontaneously. In rare cases, severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) can occur, including conditions like Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) [15][16][17][41,42,43]. The occurrence of cutaneous irAEs has been reported in 30% to 60% of patients receiving treatment. Among various ICIs, anti-CTLA-4 monotherapy has a significantly higher rate of cutaneous irAEs (44–59%) compared to anti-PD-1 (34–42%) and anti-PD-L1 monotherapy (20%). Furthermore, the combination of CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibition generally leads to an increased incidence (59–72%) and severity of skin toxicities [17][18][19][43,44,45]. It is believed that cutaneous irAEs are not dependent on the dosage of ICIs and can occur regardless of the underlying malignancy. However, recent research suggests that melanoma and renal cell carcinoma may carry a higher risk compared to other types of cancer [19][45]. Additionally, patients with pre-existing autoimmune diseases or pre-existing skin damage are more prone to experiencing cutaneous irAEs [11][20][11,46]

3. Subtypes and Possible Mechanisms of Cutaneous Immune-Related Adverse Events

The precise mechanisms responsible for ICI-induced cutaneous irAEs are not fully understood. However, several potential pathogeneses have been proposed. These include the involvement of type IV hypersensitivity reactions, genetic variations in certain human leukocyte antigen (HLA) variants, activation of self-reactive T cells and B cells that target shared antigens found in both tumor cells and normal tissues, stimulation of B cells and the humoral immune response, increased production of proinflammatory cytokines with immune-related consequences, potential exposure of host antigens from tumor cells due to cytotoxic attacks, and potential exacerbation of drug eruptions due to concurrent medication usage. The possible mechanisms of cutaneous irAEs are summarized in Table 12.
Table 12.
Possible pathogenesis, onset time, and frequency of cutaneous irAEs.
Video Production Service