Nanostructured Resistive-Based Vanadium Oxide Gas Sensors: Comparison
Please note this is a comparison between Version 3 by Peter Tang and Version 2 by Peter Tang.

Vanadium pentoxide (V2O5) is a transition metal oxide with features such as high availability, good catalytic activity, unique electrical properties and high conductivity which are appropriate for gas sensing applications.

  • V2O5
  • gas sensor
  • morphology
  • sensing mechanism
  • toxic gas

1. Introduction

Vanadium (V) is a well-known transition metal which can form different oxides. The principal oxides of vanadium are vanadium monoxide (VO, violet color), vanadium sesquioxide (V2O3, green color), vanadium dioxide (VO2, blue color), and vanadium pentoxide (V2O5, yellow color). Presence of oxygen vacancies leads to formation other oxides such as V3O7, V4O9, and V6O13 (a mixture of V5+ and V4+), and a series of oxides such as V6O11, V7O13, and V8O15 (a mixture of V4+ and V3+). In general, the mixing phases can be categorized into two series of phases namely the Magnéli phase (VnO2n-1) and the Wadsley phase VnO2n+1 [1][2]. Among different phases, V2O5 is thermodynamically the most stable oxide and it exist in different polymorphs namely the most stable α-V2O5 (orthorhombic), metastable β-V2O5 (tetragonal or monoclinic), γ-V2O5 (orthorhombic) and δ-V2O5 (monoclinic) [3]. Each polymorph is stable at a temperature and pressure range. For example, β-V2O5 is stable at high pressure and temperatures [4].
The orthorhombic V2O5 has a layered structure and it is comprised of the distorted polyhedra of six oxygen atoms which form octahedral polyhedra with central V atoms [5]. There are three different oxygen positions in the V2O5 crystal structure. The VO6 octahedra are linked, sharing edges through the chain (Oc) and corners via the bridging oxygens (Ob). Two vanadyl oxygen atoms (Ov) form the vertices of the octahedra along the c-axis [6].
V2O5 is highly abundant in nature, it has low price and has several oxidation states [7][8]. Accordingly, due to its relatively open layered structure and its unique properties, V2O5 has been used in different applications such as water splitting [9], field effect transistors [10][11], supercapacitors [12], IR detectors [13], photodetectors [14], UV sensors [15], optical sensors [16], amprometric gas sensors [17], potentiometric sensors [18] electrochemical sensors [19][20], cataluminescence sensors [21], resistance gas sensors [22][23], gasochromic sensors [24] and humidity sensors [25].
V2O5 with an n-type semiconducting behavior, has a relatively high conductivity (0.5 S·cm−1) at room temperature [26]. At high temperatures, stoichiometric V2O5 spontaneously converts to V2O5−x as follows:
Values of “x” vary depending on annealing temperature and oxygen partial pressure during synthesis. As a result, oxygen vacancies form in the oxygen sub-lattice and n-type semiconducting is induced. To be neutral, some V5+ ions will be reduced to V4+ ions. Electrical conductivity in V2O5−x is due to jumping (hopping) of the electrons from V4+ ions to the neighboring V5+ ions [26]. Compared with bulk V2O5, nanostructured V2O5 materials have unique electrical and chemical properties and due to their ultrafine sizes, they offer a high surface area which is extremely beneficial for sensing studies [27][28][29][30]. Nowadays gas sensors have become widely used in different areas for detection of toxic, hazardous, explosive and greenhouse gases and vapors [31][32]. There are many types of gas sensors. However, resistive-based gas sensors using metal oxides are the most widely used gas sensors due to their unique features such as low price, high sensitivity, high stability, fast dynamics and simple fabrication and operation [33][34]. In  a typical gas sensor,  the front side of substrate is equipped with conductive electrodes such as with Pt and its back side is equipped with a heater [35].
Pristine V2O5 gas sensors with different morphologies have been reported in the literature. The gas sensing characteristics of V2O5 hierarchical architectures, especially for hollow spheres are rarely reported in the literature. In this regard, V2O5 hollow spheres (500–550 nm in diameter and a shell thickness of 55 nm) were synthesized through a solvothermal route. The hollow spheres were comprised of nanoplates with thicknesses of 50–80 nm and lengths of 70–120 nm. Moreover, for comparison solid nanostructured spheres were fabricated. The maximum responses (Ra/Rg) to trimethylamine (TEA) at 370 °C were 9.7 for V2O5 hollow spheres and 3.08 for V2O5 solid spheres, respectively. In fact, the hollow sphere hierarchical architecture with a higher surface area offered more adsorption sites for TEA molecules and a higher response for hollow spheres resulted. The sensing mechanism of the sensor to TEA was related to the reduction of V5+ ions to V4+ ions in the presence of TEA. Furthermore, based on XPS studies there was a slight shift to lower binding energy values after exposure of the sensor to TEA gas, confirming formation of V4+ ions. In addition, a color change from yellow to dark blue was observed, further confirming the formation of V4+ ions. V2O5 is an acidic oxide, which is highly suitable for the adsorption of basic molecules, such as TEA and consequently a larger response of the V2O5 hollow spheres sensor to TEA resulted [36]. Generally, resistive based gas sensors work at high temperatures, which need external heaters and increase the power consumption. Therefore, development of room temperature gas sensors not only solves above problems, but also integration with flexible substrates become easier. Furthermore, possible risk of explosion during sensing of explosive gases such as H2 gas significantly decreases. Hollow spheres comprising numerous nanocrystals of V2O5 as a shell were synthesized by a facile polyol approach for room temperature hydrogen gas sensing. The surface area of hollow spheres was about 356 m2/g and, therefore, it provided a large active surface area for adsorption of target gases. Furthermore, its porous structure led to further enhancement of gas reactions. Furthermore, the sharp corners as well as the edges of the tiny building blocks of hollow spheres were reported as highly active sites for enhancement of the sensing reactions during hydrogen sensing [37]. Another room temperature gas sensor was realized from V2O5 nanoneedles which were synthesized by a physical vapor deposition method [38]. The sensor exhibited a response (Ra/Rg) of 2.37 to 140 ppm acetone at room temperature. The relevant reaction was as follows: The most energetically favorable gas reaction is that a surface oxygen atom attacks the carbonyl carbon to form a C-O bond. Acetone contains the carbonyl group and because of the greater electronegativity of oxygen; a carbonyl group is a polar functional group and, therefore, it has a larger dipole moment (D = 2.88), relative to other tested gases, leading to the higher response of the gas sensor to acetone. Trimethylamine (TMA; (CH3)3N)) is generated from dead fish and, therefore, the concentration of TMA is an indicator of the freshness of fish [39]. Furthermore, exposure to TMA vapor can cause nausea, headaches, and irritation to the eyes [40]. In this regard, spherical V2O5 hierarchical nanostructures comprised of plenty of nanosheets were produced through a hydrothermal method. The optimal sensor based on spherical V2O5 hierarchical nanostructures displayed a response of ~2.8 to 100 ppm TMA along with fast response/recovery times (5/28 s) at 240 °C. The spherical V2O5 nanostructures were comprised of numerous monocrystalline nanosheets, and therefore they have a unique three-dimensional hierarchical structure which provided plenty of active sites for gas molecules. Accordingly, the reaction between chemisorbed oxygen ions and TMA molecules, resulted in a decrease in electrical resistance and contributed to the sensor signal. In addition, in a monocrystalline structure free electrons were able to transfer faster than in a polycrystalline structure, which results in fast response and recovery times of gas sensors and improvement of sensing properties [41]. Table 1 presents the gas sensing characteristics of pristine V2O5 gas sensors, where different morphologies of V2O5 prepared using various methods have been successful for sensing of different gases.
Table 1. Gas sensing properties of pristine V2O5 gas sensors. 

V2O5 Morphology

Synthesis Method

Target Gas

Conc. (ppm)

Response (Ra/Rg) or (Rg/Ra)

T

(°C)

Response time/Recovery Time(s)

Ref.

Hollow spheres

Solid spheres

Solvothermal

C3H9N

500

500

9.7

3.08

370

20/83

45/150

[36]

Hollow spheres

Chemical synthesis

H2

200

2.8

RT

50/10

[37]

Nanoneedles

PVD

C3H6O

140

2.35

RT

67/-

[38]

Hierarchical nanostructures

Hydrothermal

C3H9N

10–200

1.13-3.57

240

) of 9 to 100 ppm diethylamine along with good selectivity to diethylamine gas and a fast response time of 2 s at 350 °C [63]. Improved sensing performance was related to the formation of V2O5-Fe2O3 heterojunctions and catalytic effect of V2O5 to diethylamine. Porous silicon (PS) is a good candidate for sensing studies due to its offering of a high surface area and a porous structure. In addition it can be simply prepared by a chemical etching process [64]. Therefore, composites between V2O5 and PS can be promising for gas sensing studies. In a relevant study, thin V films were decorated on the PS by sputtering at different times of 30 and 60 min and then, the samples were annealed at 600 °C [65]. The PS/V2O5 NRs structure provided a better response than pristine PS at 25 °C, and the sensor sputtered for 60 min exhibited the highest response of 7.4 to 2 ppm NO2 gas. Both the PS and V2O5 NRs had plenty of dangling bonds, oxygen vacancies and defects, leading to high adsorption of oxygen molecules even at room temperature. In the interfaces between PS and V2O5, p-n heterojunctions formed and, upon exposure to NO2 gas, the significant modulation of electrical resistance in the heterojunctions led to the appearance of a sensing signal. Graphene and its derivations such as graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide have high surface areas and unique electrical properties which can be beneficial for gas sensing studies [66][67]. The initial resistance of the GO is high, limiting its practical applications in pristine form [68][69]. However, after the reduction GO to RGO, there are some defects, vacancies and functional groups which are useful for gas sensing applications [70]. In a relevant study, an RGO surface was decorated with Mn3O4 and V2O5 NOs via a hydrothermal method for detection of H2 gas at 30 °C. The sensor showed a high response (ΔR/Ra × 100) of 174% to 50 ppm H2 gas at room temperature. The sheet-like structure of RGO provided a large surface area for gas sensing reactions. In addition, because of the formation of p-n (RGO-V2O5) and p-p (RGO-Mn3O4) heterojunctions, significant modulation of resistance in the presence of H2 occurred, resulting in the generation of a sensing signal [71]. In another study, a V2O5 film was prepared by a reactive sputtering technique and then, RGO was decorated over the V2O5 thin film by a drop casting method for NO2 sensing studies. The sensor showed a response of 50.7% to 100 ppm NO2 gas at 150 °C. However, its recovery time was long (778 s). Formation and modulation of the p-n heterojunction at the interface of RGO and V2O5 was the main reason for the detection of NO2 gas. Moreover, the presence of active sites such as oxygen functional groups on the RGO surface improved the sensing response [72]. Not only can V2O5-decoration be a useful technique to enhance the gas sensing properties, but decoration of other metal oxides or noble metals on the surface of gas sensor can also be a good technique to improve the gas sensing properties of V2O5-based gas sensors. A P-type CuO with excellent catalytic activity is extensively used for sensing studies [73]. The work function of CuO is 5.3 eV, which is different to that of V2O5 (4.7 eV). Therefore, when heterojunctions form between the CuO and V2O5, enhanced gas response can be expected. In this context, hollow nanostructures using CuO decorated V2O5 nano-strings of pearls were fabricated through an electrospinning method. The V2O5/CuO sensors demonstrated a response (Ra/Rg ) of 8.8 to 500 ppm acetone at 440 °C, which was more than three times higher than that of bare V2O5 NFs. The improved performance was related to the generation of CuO/V2O5 p-n heterojunctions, which provided plenty of resistance modulation sources and upon exposure to acetone gas higher response was resulted [74]. Table 2 shows the gas sensing properties of decorated or doped V2O5-based gas sensors, where different synthesis methods along with different morphologies and various materials have been reported to realize gas sensors for the sensing of toxic gases.
Table 2. Gas sensing properties of decorated or doped V2O5-based gas sensors.

Sensor

Synthesis Method

Target Gas

Conc. (ppm)

Response (Ra/Rg) or (Rg/Ra)

Working Temp. (°C)

Response Time/Recovery Time(s)

Ref.

Pd decorated porous Si/V2O5 nanopillars

DC sputtering

NO2

2

4.5

RT

-/-

[59]

Ru-decorated layer structure V2O5

Hydrothermal

NH3

130

4 *

RT

~2/~12

[62]

V2O5-decorated α-Fe2O3 nanorods

5 NPs, the surface area was only ∼16 m2/g with a pore size of 12.9 nm, while the BET surface area of V2O5@TiO2 C-S NPs was greatly increased to ∼151 m2/g, and the average pore size was ∼6.4 nm. Thus, the significant increase in surface area was an advantage for C-S NPs, which directly affected the gas sensing studies. The C-S sensor showed a response (Ra/Rg) of 8.6 to 100 ppm ammonia at 365 °C. Upon intimate contact between the V2O5 and TiO2, electrons moved from TiO2 to V2O5, resulting in the creation of an electron depletion layer on both sides of the TiO2 shell layer. Upon injection of NH3 gas into the gas chamber, the electrons released back caused the narrowing of the electron depletion layers which finally modulated the electrical resistances of the gas sensor. Moreover, based on DFT calculations, the NH3 molecule showed the lowest adsorption energy (−1.04 eV) on the anatase TiO2 (101) surface, which explained the higher selectivity of the gas sensor to NH3 among other tested gases. The optimal sensing temperature of the gas sensor was registered at 365 °C. The reactions on the surface of TiO2 can be shown as follows:
Thus, more electrons can be released when NxO (x = 1, 2), demonstrating the high response toward NH3 at elevated temperatures (>300 °C).
Table 3 exhibits the sensing properties of various V2O5-based composite gas sensors, where different materials along with various morphologies have been used for sensing of different gases.
Table 3. Gas sensing properties of V2O5-based composite gas sensors.

Sensing Material

Synthesis Method

Target Gas

Conc. (Ppm)

Response (Ra/Rg) Or (Rg/Ra)

T (°C)

Response Time/Recovery Time(S)

Ref.

V2O5/In2O3 core–shells

Hydrothermal

n-propylamine

200

4

190

48/121

[86]

MoO3-V2O5 thin films

Chemical spray pyrolysis

NO2

120

80 *

200

118/1182

[87]

(MoO3)0.4(V2O5)0.6 sheet composite

Electrospinning

Chemical spray pyrolysis

C4H11N

100

300

115

9

350

2/40

[63]

39/453

[88]

V2O5 decorated SnO2 NWs

Au/V2O5/CuWO

VLS/ALD

4 composite

NO

Hydrothermal

2

NH3

200 ppb

5

3.6

250

5/28

-/-

[41]

[

75

]

2.7

150

35/33

[89]

Flower-like

Porous Si/V2O5

NR composite

Hydrothermal

Galvanostatic electrochemical etching

5

NO2

2.25

2

200

7.4

13/13

RT

[42]

-/-

[

65

]

90]

Nanorods

rGO/Mn3O4/V2O5 nanocomposite

CVD

V2O5/polyvinyl acetate NF composite

Hydrothermal

NH3

H

100

2

235 *

400

-/-

50

[43]

Electrospinning

175

RT

NH3

0.8

6 *

26082/92

-/-

[

[91]

Nanorods

Solvothermal

V2O5/ZnV2O6 nanobelt composite

Chemical route

C2H5OH

NH3

C

500

1.04

1.02

2

RT

H5

-/-

[44]

71

]

OH

2000

16.5

240

Spherical

Precipitation

C2H5OH

NH3

1.04

1.06

-/-

[45]

Flower-like

Hydrothermal

1-butylamine

100

2.6

140

9/49

[46]

Nanofibers

Pd-decorated CuO NWs

UV irradiation

H2S

100

1.962

100

-/-

[72]

-/-

[

92

]

V2O5/CuO nano-string of pearls

TiO2/V2O5 NF composite

Electrospinning

Electrospinning

C3H6O

500

9

440

~40/~100

100

24.6

350

6/7

[93]

[74]

CuO-decorated V2O5 NWs

ZnO/V2O

Hydrothermal and wet-deposition

H2S

5

23

thin films

31.86

Spray pyrolysis

C7H8

400

2.3

220

27

23/28

[94]

Electrospinning

9.5

500 *

RT

-/-

RT

[47]

-/-

[

77

]

Fe2O3 activated V2O5 nanotubes

Hydrolysis

C2H5OH

SnO2/V2O5 composite

Sol-gel

C6H6

200

10.5

275

-/-

[

130/218

[76]

Flower-like Sheet-like

SnO2 NP-decorated V2O5 NWs

Hydrothermal

C2H5OH

1000

1.3

Hydrothermal

100

3.6

2.8

300

1000

25/14

17/14

[

2.2

48

270

]

-/-

[

78

]

Nanofibers

TiO2-decorated V2

Sol–gel

O5 NWs

Hydrothermal

NH3

2.1

O3

1.25

11 *

2.6 *

200

300

50/350

~180/~180

[49]

[

79

]

Flower-like

DC sputtering

CH4

500

100

206/247

[50]

RGO-decorated V2O5 thin film

Reactive sputtering and drop casting

NO2

100

50.7

150

-/-

[72]

Hydrothermal

Au NP-decorated V2O5

C8H10

3

Two-step in-situ reduction of Au and thermal oxidization as V2O5

Amines

300

100

44/74

7.5

[51]

240

90/35

[80]

Nano stars

Hydrothermal

He

300

53 *

RT

9/10

[52]

Nanorods

Chemical spray pyrolysis

NO2

100

24.2 *

200

13/140

[53]

Nanofibers

Chemical spray pyrolysis

C8H10

Pd-decorated V2O5 thin film

DC magnetron reactive sputtering

H2

100

5.7

100

~6/14.8

[81]

V2O5-

doped SnO2 NFs

Electrospinning

C

27

RT

80/50

[54]

6

H

6

25

6.32

325

3/47

[82]

Nanowires

Melt quenching

C2H5OH

1000

9.09

330

-/-

[55]

Thin film

Plasma focus method

H2

50 *

275

-/-

[56]

Chemical spray pyrolysis

NO2

100

41 *

200

20/150

[57]

* Response = Δ𝑅/𝑅𝑎×100; RT: Room temperature; PVD: Physical vapor deposition; CVD: Chemical vapor deposition.

3. Decorated/Doped V2O5 Gas Sensors

Based on the above section about pristine V2O5 gas sensors, pristine V2O5 nanostructures suffer from low sensitivity and selectivity, which hinder their applications for sensing applications [58]. Accordingly, different strategies, such as p-n heterojunction formation [59], n-n heterojunction formation [60][61] and noble metal decoration [62] have been proposed to enhance their sensing properties. V2O5 decoration is a good strategy to enhance the sensing properties of gas sensors. V2O5-decorated α-Fe2O3 composite NRs were prepared by an electrospinning technique and they had a high surface area of 30.5 m2/g. The composite exhibited a response (Ra/Rg

* Response = Δ𝑅/𝑅𝑎×100; RT: Room temperature; VLS: Vapor-liquid-solid; NR; Nanorod; NP; Nanoparticle; NF; Nanofiber.

4. Nanocomposites/Nanohybrids of V2O5 Gas Sensors

Core-shell (C-S) nanocomposites are among the most promising structures for gas sensing studies, as in these structures the interfaces between two different materials are maximized, resulting in significant modulation of electrical resistance upon exposure to target gases [83][84][85]. Fu et al. [39], synthesized V2O5-TiO2 core-shell (C-S) NPs for NH3 studies. For pristine V2O

* Response = Δ𝑅/𝑅𝑎×100.

References

  1. Le, T.K.; Kang, M.; Kim, S.W. A review on the optical characterization of v2o5 micro-nanostructures. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 15781–15798.
  2. Mane, A.A.; Maldar, P.S.; Dabhole, S.H.; Nikam, S.A.; Moholkar, A.V. Effect of substrate temperature on physicochemical and gas sensing properties of sprayed orthorhombic v2o5 thin films. Measurement 2019, 131, 223–234.
  3. Bouzidi, A.; Benramdane, N.; Bresson, S.; Mathieu, C.; Desfeux, R.; Marssi, M.E. X-ray and raman study of spray pyrolysed vanadium oxide thin films. Vib. Spectrosc. 2011, 57, 182–186.
  4. Su, Q.; Lan, W.; Wang, Y.Y.; Liu, X.Q. Structural characterization of β-v2o5 films prepared by dc reactive magnetron sputtering. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2009, 255, 4177–4179.
  5. Ramana, C.; Hussain, O.; Naidu, B.S.; Reddy, P. Spectroscopic characterization of electron-beam evaporated v2o5 thin films. Thin Solid Film 1997, 305, 219–226.
  6. Laubach, S.; Schmidt, P.C.; Thißen, A.; Fernandez-Madrigal, F.J.; Wu, Q.-H.; Jaegermann, W.; Klemm, M.; Horn, S. Theoretical and experimental determination of the electronic structure of v2o5, reduced v2o5− x and sodium intercalated nav2o5. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007, 9, 2564–2576.
  7. Aawani, E.; Memarian, N.; Dizaji, H.R. Synthesis and characterization of reduced graphene oxide–v2o5 nanocomposite for enhanced photocatalytic activity under different types of irradiation. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2019, 125, 8–15.
  8. Rathika, R.; Kovendhan, M.; Joseph, D.P.; Pachaiappan, R.; Kumar, A.S.; Vijayarangamuthu, K.; Venkateswaran, C.; Asokan, K.; Jeyakumar, S.J. Tailoring the properties of spray deposited v2o5 thin films using swift heavy ion beam irradiation. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2020.
  9. Hou, T.-F.; Johar, M.A.; Boppella, R.; Hassan, M.A.; Patil, S.J.; Ryu, S.-W.; Lee, D.-W. Vertically aligned one-dimensional zno/v2o5 core–shell hetero-nanostructure for photoelectrochemical water splitting. J. Energy Chem. 2020, 49, 262–274.
  10. Slewa, L.H.; Abbas, T.A.; Ahmed, N.M. Effect of sn doping and annealing on the morphology, structural, optical, and electrical properties of 3d (micro/nano) v2o5 sphere for high sensitivity ph-egfet sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 305, 127515.
  11. Abd-Alghafour, N.M.; Ahmed, N.M.; Hassan, Z.; Almessiere, M.A.; Bououdina, M.; Al-Hardan, N.H. High sensitivity extended gate effect transistor based on v2o5 nanorods. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2017, 28, 1364–1369.
  12. Yin, Z.; Xu, J.; Ge, Y.; Jiang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Hou, S.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, Y. Synthesis of v2o5 microspheres by spray pyrolysis as cathode material for supercapacitors. Mater. Res. Express 2018, 5, 036306.
  13. Deepak Raj, P.; Gupta, S.; Sridharan, M. Studies on nanostructured v2o5/v/v2o5 films for un-cooled ir detector application. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2016, 27, 7494–7500.
  14. Abd-Alghafour, N.M.; Ahmed, N.M.; Hassan, Z. Fabrication and characterization of v2o5 nanorods based metal–semiconductor–metal photodetector. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2016, 250, 250–257.
  15. Kim, D.; Yun, J.; Lee, G.; Ha, J.S. Fabrication of high performance flexible micro-supercapacitor arrays with hybrid electrodes of mwnt/v2o5 nanowires integrated with a sno2 nanowire uv sensor. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 12034–12041.
  16. Singh, N.; Umar, A.; Singh, N.; Fouad, H.; Alothman, O.Y.; Haque, F.Z. Highly sensitive optical ammonia gas sensor based on sn doped v2o5 nanoparticles. Mater. Res. Bull. 2018, 108, 266–274.
  17. Santos, M.C.; Hamdan, O.H.C.; Valverde, S.A.; Guerra, E.M.; Bianchi, R.F. Synthesis and characterization of v2o5/pani thin films for application in amperometric ammonia gas sensors. Org. Electron. 2019, 65, 116–120.
  18. Wang, C.; Li, X.; Yuan, Y.; Wang, B.; Huang, J.; Xia, F.; Zhang, H.; Xiao, J. Effects of sintering temperature on sensing properties of v2o5-wo3-tio2 electrode for potentiometric ammonia sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 241, 268–275.
  19. Alam, M.M.; Uddin, M.T.; Asiri, A.M.; Rahman, M.M.; Islam, M.A. Development of reproducible thiourea sensor with binary sno2/v2o5 nanomaterials by electrochemical method. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 13, 5406–5416.
  20. Rajesh, K.; Santhanalakshmi, J. Design and development of graphene intercalated v2o5 nanosheets based electrochemical sensors for effective determination of potentially hazardous 3,5–dichlorophenol. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2017, 199, 497–507.
  21. Zhang, H.; Zhang, L.; Hu, J.; Cai, P.; Lv, Y. A cataluminescence gas sensor based on nanosized v2o5 for tert-butyl mercaptan. Talanta 2010, 82, 733–738.
  22. Karthikeyan, P.S.; Dhivya, P.; Deepak Raj, P.; Sridharan, M. V2o5 thin film for 2-propanol vapor sensing. Mater. Today Proc. 2016, 3, 1510–1516.
  23. Imawan, C.; Steffes, H.; Solzbacher, F.; Obermeier, E. Structural and gas-sensing properties of v2o5–moo3 thin films for h2 detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2001, 77, 346–351.
  24. Chen, C.L.; Dong, C.L.; Ho, Y.K.; Chang, C.C.; Wei, D.H.; Chan, T.C.; Chen, J.L.; Jang, W.L.; Hsu, C.C.; Kumar, K.; et al. Electronic and atomic structures of gasochromic v2o5 films. EPL (Europhys. Lett.) 2013, 101, 17006.
  25. Tadeo, I.J.; Parasuraman, R.; Krupanidhi, S.B.; Umarji, A.M. Enhanced humidity responsive ultrasonically nebulised v2o5 thin films. Nano Express 2020, 1, 010005.
  26. Schneider, K.; Lubecka, M.; Czapla, A. V2o5 thin films for gas sensor applications. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 236, 970–977.
  27. Vasanth Raj, D.; Ponpandian, N.; Mangalaraj, D.; Viswanathan, C. Effect of annealing and electrochemical properties of sol–gel dip coated nanocrystalline v2o5 thin films. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2013, 16, 256–262.
  28. Gandasiri, R.; Sreelatha, C.J.; Nagaraju, P.; Vijayakumar, Y. Effect of annealing temperature on micro-structural, optical and electrical characterization of nanostructured v2o5 thin films prepared by spray pyrolysis technique. Phys. B Condens. Matter 2019, 572, 220–224.
  29. Thangarasu, R.; Thangavel, E.; Chandrasekaran, J.; Balasundaram, O.N. Synthesis, characterization and gas sensing performance of v2o5 nano-structure on pet substrate. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2019, 30, 4238–4249.
  30. Yıldırım, M.A.; Tuna Yıldırım, S.; Çağirtekin, A.O.; Karademir, M.; Karaduman Er, I.; Coşkun, A.; Ateş, A.; Acar, S. The effect of deposition time on the structural, morphological and h2s gas sensing properties of the v2o5 nanostructures deposited by hydrothermal method. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2019, 30, 12215–12223.
  31. Mirzaei, A.; Leonardi, S.G.; Neri, G. Detection of hazardous volatile organic compounds (vocs) by metal oxide nanostructures-based gas sensors: A review. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 15119–15141.
  32. Mirzaei, A.; Neri, G. Microwave-assisted synthesis of metal oxide nanostructures for gas sensing application: A review. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 237, 749–775.
  33. Amiri, V.; Roshan, H.; Mirzaei, A.; Neri, G.; Ayesh, A.I. Nanostructured metal oxide-based acetone gas sensors: A review. Sensors 2020, 20, 3096.
  34. Mirzaei, A.; Lee, J.-H.; Majhi, S.M.; Weber, M.; Bechelany, M.; Kim, H.W.; Kim, S.S. Resistive gas sensors based on metal-oxide nanowires. J. Appl. Phys. 2019, 126, 241102.
  35. Mirzaei, A.; Janghorban, K.; Hashemi, B.; Bonyani, M.; Leonardi, S.G.; Neri, G. A novel gas sensor based on ag/fe2o3 core-shell nanocomposites. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 18974–18982.
  36. Wu, M.; Zhang, X.; Gao, S.; Cheng, X.; Rong, Z.; Xu, Y.; Zhao, H.; Huo, L. Construction of monodisperse vanadium pentoxide hollow spheres via a facile route and triethylamine sensing property. CrystEngComm 2013, 15, 10123–10131.
  37. Wang, Y.-T.; Whang, W.-T.; Chen, C.-H. Hollow v2o5 nanoassemblies for high-performance room-temperature hydrogen sensors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 8480–8487.
  38. Hakim, S.A.; Liu, Y.; Zakharova, G.S.; Chen, W. Synthesis of vanadium pentoxide nanoneedles by physical vapour deposition and their highly sensitive behavior towards acetone at room temperature. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 23489–23497.
  39. Li, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhang, J.; Liang, X.; Zhang, X.; Qi, Q. Deposition of in2o3 nanofibers on polyimide substrates to construct high-performance and flexible trimethylamine sensor. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2019.
  40. Zhang, J.; Song, P.; Li, Z.; Zhang, S.; Yang, Z.; Wang, Q. Enhanced trimethylamine sensing performance of single-crystal moo3 nanobelts decorated with au nanoparticles. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 685, 1024–1033.
  41. Wang, D.; Gu, K.; Zhao, Q.; Zhai, C.; Yang, T.; Lu, Q.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, M. Synthesis and trimethylamine sensing properties of spherical v2o5 hierarchical structures. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 14188–14193.
  42. Meng, D.; Si, J.; Wang, M.; Wang, G.; Shen, Y.; San, X.; Meng, F. In-situ growth of v2o5 flower-like structures on ceramic tubes and their trimethylamine sensing properties. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2019.
  43. Akande, A.A.; Mosuang, T.; Ouma, C.N.M.; Benecha, E.M.; Tesfamichael, T.; Roro, K.; Machatine, A.G.J.; Mwakikunga, B.W. Ammonia gas sensing characteristics of v2o5 nanostructures: A combined experimental and ab initio density functional theory approach. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 821, 153565.
  44. Dhayal Raj, A.; Pazhanivel, T.; Suresh Kumar, P.; Mangalaraj, D.; Nataraj, D.; Ponpandian, N. Self assembled v2o5 nanorods for gas sensors. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2010, 10, 531–537.
  45. Dhayal Raj, A.; Suresh Kumar, P.; Yang, Q.; Mangalaraj, D. Synthesis and gas sensors behavior of surfactants free v2o5 nanostructure by using a simple precipitation method. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostructures 2012, 44, 1490–1494.
  46. Yang, T.; Yu, H.; Xiao, B.; Li, Z.; Zhang, M. Enhanced 1-butylamine gas sensing characteristics of flower-like v2o5 hierarchical architectures. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 699, 921–927.
  47. Raible, I.; Burghard, M.; Schlecht, U.; Yasuda, A.; Vossmeyer, T. V2o5 nanofibres: Novel gas sensors with extremely high sensitivity and selectivity to amines. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2005, 106, 730–735.
  48. Yang, X.H.; Xie, H.; Fu, H.T.; An, X.Z.; Jiang, X.C.; Yu, A.B. Synthesis of hierarchical nanosheet-assembled v2o5 microflowers with high sensing properties towards amines. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 87649–87655.
  49. Modafferi, V.; Panzera, G.; Donato, A.; Antonucci, P.L.; Cannilla, C.; Donato, N.; Spadaro, D.; Neri, G. Highly sensitive ammonia resistive sensor based on electrospun v2o5 fibers. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2012, 163, 61–68.
  50. Mounasamy, V.; Mani, G.K.; Ponnusamy, D.; Tsuchiya, K.; Reshma, P.R.; Prasad, A.K.; Madanagurusamy, S. Investigation on ch4 sensing characteristics of hierarchical v2o5 nanoflowers operated at relatively low temperature using chemiresistive approach. Anal. Chim. Acta 2020, 1106, 148–160.
  51. Cao, P.; Gui, X.; Navale, S.T.; Han, S.; Xu, W.; Fang, M.; Liu, X.; Zeng, Y.; Liu, W.; Zhu, D.; et al. Design of flower-like v2o5 hierarchical nanostructures by hydrothermal strategy for the selective and sensitive detection of xylene. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 815, 152378.
  52. Chauhan, P.S.; Bhattacharya, S. Highly sensitive v2o5·1.6h2o nanostructures for sensing of helium gas at room temperature. Mater. Lett. 2018, 217, 83–87.
  53. Mane, A.A.; Suryawanshi, M.P.; Kim, J.H.; Moholkar, A.V. Fast response of sprayed vanadium pentoxide (v2o5) nanorods towards nitrogen dioxide (no2) gas detection. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 403, 540–550.
  54. Vijayakumar, Y.; Mani, G.K.; Ponnusamy, D.; Shankar, P.; Kulandaisamy, A.J.; Tsuchiya, K.; Rayappan, J.B.B.; Ramana Reddy, M.V. V2o5 nanofibers: Potential contestant for high performance xylene sensor. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 731, 805–812.
  55. Jin, W.; Yan, S.; An, L.; Chen, W.; Yang, S.; Zhao, C.; Dai, Y. Enhancement of ethanol gas sensing response based on ordered v2o5 nanowire microyarns. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 206, 284–290.
  56. Panahi, N.; Shirazi, M.; Hosseinnejad, M.T. Fabrication, characterization and hydrogen gas sensing performance of nanostructured v2o5 thin films prepared by plasma focus method. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2018, 29, 13345–13353.
  57. Mane, A.A.; Moholkar, A.V. Effect of film thickness on no2 gas sensing properties of sprayed orthorhombic nanocrystalline v2o5 thin films. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 416, 511–520.
  58. Fu, H.; Jiang, X.; Yang, X.; Yu, A.; Su, D.; Wang, G. Glycothermal synthesis of assembled vanadium oxide nanostructures for gas sensing. J. Nanopart. Res. 2012, 14, 871.
  59. Qiang, X.; Hu, M.; Zhou, L.; Liang, J. Pd nanoparticles incorporated porous silicon/v2o5 nanopillars and their enhanced p-type no2-sensing properties at room temperature. Mater. Lett. 2018, 231, 194–197.
  60. Bolokang, A.S.; Motaung, D.E. Reduction-oxidation of v2o5-wo3 nanostructured by ball milling and annealing: Their improved h2s gas sensing performance. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 473, 164–173.
  61. Liang, Y.-C.; Cheng, Y.-R. Combinational physical synthesis methodology and crystal features correlated with oxidizing gas detection ability of one-dimensional zno–vox crystalline hybrids. CrystEngComm 2015, 17, 5801–5807.
  62. Birajdar, S.N.; Hebalkar, N.Y.; Pardeshi, S.K.; Kulkarni, S.K.; Adhyapak, P.V. Ruthenium-decorated vanadium pentoxide for room temperature ammonia sensing. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 28735–28745.
  63. Zhang, H.; Luo, Y.; Zhuo, M.; Yang, T.; Liang, J.; Zhang, M.; Ma, J.; Duan, H.; Li, Q. Diethylamine gas sensor using v2o5-decorated α-fe2o3 nanorods as a sensing material. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 6511–6515.
  64. Ozdemir, S.; Gole, J.L. The potential of porous silicon gas sensors. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2007, 11, 92–100.
  65. Yan, W.; Hu, M.; Wang, D.; Li, C. Room temperature gas sensing properties of porous silicon/v2o5 nanorods composite. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 346, 216–222.
  66. Chatterjee, S.G.; Chatterjee, S.; Ray, A.K.; Chakraborty, A.K. Graphene–metal oxide nanohybrids for toxic gas sensor: A review. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 221, 1170–1181.
  67. Meng, F.-L.; Guo, Z.; Huang, X.-J. Graphene-based hybrids for chemiresistive gas sensors. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2015, 68, 37–47.
  68. Toda, K.; Furue, R.; Hayami, S. Recent progress in applications of graphene oxide for gas sensing: A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2015, 878, 43–53.
  69. Wang, T.; Huang, D.; Yang, Z.; Xu, S.; He, G.; Li, X.; Hu, N.; Yin, G.; He, D.; Zhang, L. A review on graphene-based gas/vapor sensors with unique properties and potential applications. Nano-Micro Lett. 2016, 8, 95–119.
  70. Lu, G.; Ocola, L.E.; Chen, J. Reduced graphene oxide for room-temperature gas sensors. Nanotechnology 2009, 20, 445502.
  71. Amarnath, M.; Heiner, A.; Gurunathan, K. Surface bound nanostructures of ternary r-go/ mn3o4/v2o5 system for room temperature selectivity of hydrogen gas. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 7336–7345.
  72. Bhati, V.S.; Sheela, D.; Roul, B.; Raliya, R.; Biswas, P.; Kumar, M.; Roy, M.S.; Nanda, K.K.; Krupanidhi, S.B.; Kumar, M. No2 gas sensing performance enhancement based on reduced graphene oxide decorated v2o5 thin films. Nanotechnology 2019, 30, 224001.
  73. Kim, J.-Y.; Lee, J.-H.; Kim, J.-H.; Mirzaei, A.; Woo Kim, H.; Kim, S.S. Realization of h2s sensing by pd-functionalized networked cuo nanowires in self-heating mode. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 299, 126965.
  74. Wu, J.; Xing, X.; Zhu, Z.; Zheng, L.; Chen, J.; Wang, C.; Yang, D. Electrospun hollow cuo modified v2o5 nano-string of pearls with improved acetone sensitivity. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2019, 727, 19–24.
  75. Ko, W.C.; Kim, K.M.; Kwon, Y.J.; Choi, H.; Park, J.K.; Jeong, Y.K. Ald-assisted synthesis of v2o5 nanoislands on sno2 nanowires for improving no2 sensing performance. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 509, 144821.
  76. Yeh, B.-Y.; Jian, B.-S.; Wang, G.-J.; Tseng, W.J. Cuo/v2o5 hybrid nanowires for highly sensitive and selective h2s gas sensor. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 49605–49612.
  77. Wang, R.; Yang, S.; Deng, R.; Chen, W.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zakharova, G.S. Enhanced gas sensing properties of v2o5 nanowires decorated with sno2 nanoparticles to ethanol at room temperature. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 41050–41058.
  78. Jin, W.; Dong, B.; Chen, W.; Zhao, C.; Mai, L.; Dai, Y. Synthesis and gas sensing properties of fe2o3 nanoparticles activated v2o5 nanotubes. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2010, 145, 211–215.
  79. Avansi, W.; Catto, A.C.; da Silva, L.F.; Fiorido, T.; Bernardini, S.; Mastelaro, V.R.; Aguir, K.; Arenal, R. One-dimensional v2o5/tio2 heterostructures for chemiresistive ozone sensors. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2019, 2, 4756–4764.
  80. Yang, X.; Wang, W.; Wang, C.; Xie, H.; Fu, H.; An, X.; Jiang, X.; Yu, A. Synthesis of au decorated v2o5 microflowers with enhanced sensing properties towards amines. Powder Technol. 2018, 339, 408–418.
  81. Sanger, A.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, A.; Jaiswal, J.; Chandra, R. A fast response/recovery of hydrophobic pd/v2o5 thin films for hydrogen gas sensing. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 236, 16–26.
  82. Feng, C.; Li, X.; Wang, C.; Sun, Y.; Zheng, J.; Lu, G. Facile synthesis benzene sensor based on v2o5-doped sno2 nanofibers. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 47549–47555.
  83. Mirzaei, A.; Janghorban, K.; Hashemi, B.; Neri, G. oxide-shell nanomaterials for gas-sensing applications: A review. J. Nanopart. Res. 2015, 17, 371.
  84. Mirzaei, A.; Kim, J.-H.; Kim, H.W.; Kim, S.S. How shell thickness can affect the gas sensing properties of nanostructured materials: Survey of literature. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 258, 270–294.
  85. Kim, J.-H.; Mirzaei, A.; Kim, H.W.; Kim, S.S. Low power-consumption co gas sensors based on au-functionalized sno2-zno core-shell nanowires. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 267, 597–607.
  86. Shah, A.H.; Liu, Y.; Nguyen, V.T.; Zakharova, G.S.; Mehmood, I.; Chen, W. Enhanced ultra-stable n-propylamine sensing behavior of v2o5/in2o3 core–shell nanorods. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 54412–54419.
  87. Mane, A.A.; Nikam, S.A.; Moholkar, A.V. No2 gas sensing properties of sprayed composite porous moo3-v2o5 thin films. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2018, 216, 294–304.
  88. Mane, A.A.; Maldar, P.S.; Desai, S.P.; Moholkar, A.V. Gas sensing properties of (moo3)0.4(v2o5)0.6 microsheets: Effect of pd sensitization. Vacuum 2017, 144, 135–144.
  89. Naderi, H.; Hajati, S.; Ghaedi, M.; Dashtian, K.; Sabzehmeidani, M.M. Sensitive, selective and rapid ammonia-sensing by gold nanoparticle-sensitized v2o5/cuwo4 heterojunctions for exhaled breath analysis. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 501, 144270.
  90. Zhang, F.; Wang, X.; Dong, J.; Qin, N.; Xu, J. Selective btex sensor based on a sno2/v2o5 composite. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 186, 126–131.
  91. Modafferi, V.; Trocino, S.; Donato, A.; Panzera, G.; Neri, G. Electrospun v2o5 composite fibers: Synthesis, characterization and ammonia sensing properties. Thin Solid Film 2013, 548, 689–694.
  92. Xiao, B.; Huang, H.; Yu, X.; Song, J.; Qu, J. Facile synthesis of layered v2o5/znv2o6 heterostructures with enhanced sensing performance. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 447, 569–575.
  93. Wang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Meng, C.; Gao, Z.; Cao, X.; Li, X.; Xu, L.; Zhu, W.; Peng, X.; Zhang, B.; et al. A high-response ethanol gas sensor based on one-dimensional tio2/v2o branched nanoheterostructures. Nanotechnology 2016, 27, 425503.
  94. Nagaraju, P.; Vijayakumar, Y.; Reddy, M.V.R.; Deshpande, U.P. Effect of vanadium pentoxide concentration in zno/v2o5 nanostructured composite thin films for toluene detection. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 16515–16524.
More
Video Production Service