Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 -- 3169 2024-03-28 22:44:51 |
2 format -19 word(s) 3150 2024-04-02 03:43:34 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?


Are you sure to Delete?
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Grivas, G. Health Risks of Children in Marathon Races. Encyclopedia. Available online: (accessed on 14 April 2024).
Grivas G. Health Risks of Children in Marathon Races. Encyclopedia. Available at: Accessed April 14, 2024.
Grivas, Gerasimos. "Health Risks of Children in Marathon Races" Encyclopedia, (accessed April 14, 2024).
Grivas, G. (2024, March 28). Health Risks of Children in Marathon Races. In Encyclopedia.
Grivas, Gerasimos. "Health Risks of Children in Marathon Races." Encyclopedia. Web. 28 March, 2024.
Health Risks of Children in Marathon Races

Compared with other sports, running is popular sport for children throughout the world. Over the last few decades, marathon running has become increasingly popular even in the age group below 18 years. While the majority of youth athletes fall within the 16–18 age range, it is noteworthy that there are also participants younger than 12 years engaging in marathon races. Advice on the safety of youth athletes participating in these events is frequently sought by parents, coaches, sport scientists, and medical professionals, particularly concerning potential short- and long-term health consequences. The act of marathon running has the potential to impact key organ systems during the crucial phases of growth and development. To ensure the safety of marathon running in youth runners, it is essential to address multiple physiological and psychological aspects of health. These recommendations are directed towards ensuring the safe participation of youth athletes in marathon races through proper and individualized assessments.

children marathon health risks musculoskeletal conditions cardiovascular system

1. Musculoskeletal Conditions

Participation in any physical activity, especially marathons, elevates the risk of acute or overuse musculoskeletal injuries and, albeit rarely, medical collapse [1][2][3][4]. Numerous risk factors unique to growing children exist. Stress fractures, a distinct overuse injury, are well documented to be a function of both the number of repetitions and the applied force per repetition [2]. A child with a shorter stride length may experience a greater number of impact repetitions to cover the same distance as an adult. Immature articular cartilage, being more susceptible to shear force compared to adult cartilage, can predispose children to conditions such as osteochondritis dissecans [5]. For youth runners, the stage of growth and development may be a more appropriate measure of risk for injury or illness than chronological age [1].
Several published reports have highlighted stress-related injuries in youth athletes [6]. A comprehensive literature review identified 32 cases of physeal injury among youth athletes, with only two case studies involving long-distance runners—one pertaining to proximal tibial and the other to metatarsal metaphyseal widening [7]. Most of the school runners reported a history of running-related injuries. The most common injuries were plantar fasciitis, iliotibial band syndrome, and Osgood–Schlatter disease [8]. Additionally, a study by Goldman et al. [9] found that during a 28-week marathon training program, 18% of adolescent participants reported an injury. The most commonly reported injury site was the knee (33%), followed by the lower leg (19%), foot (14%), ankle (13%), thigh (6%), and hip (6%). Previous studies reported that runners with a history of running-related injuries tended to run greater average weekly mileage and ran faster [8].

2. Psychological Effects

One of the principal areas of concern in evaluating the effects of marathon training on youth athletes is the psychological effects [10]. Attention has predominantly centered on burnout, with children who engage in rigorous training during their youth often dropping out of the sport in their late teens [10]. This phenomenon is seen when looking at youth runners. The vast majority of successful top-ranked youth runners do not continue on to become top-level senior runners [10]. More especially, athletes immersed in intensive athletic endeavors often undergo emotional burnout and a decrease in self-esteem, leading to a waning interest in the very activity that dominated their childhood and early adolescent years [11]. The American Academy of Pediatrics’ Committee on Sports Medicine has identified psychological pressures as potential issues associated with distance running [12]. Intensive training at a young age may subject some children to psychological factors and burnout, ultimately leading to dropout from sport participation [6]. In Roberts’ review [6], it was reported that the majority of child athletes in all sports drop out by the age of 13 years. Despite the common trend of youth and high school athletes retiring after high school, the post-high school status of participants in distance running remains unknown. Also, the International Amateur Athletic Federation of England guidelines state that intense training in children can cause unnecessary phycological stress [13].

3. Cardiovascular System

It is well known that regular activity can reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease [14][15]. The ongoing debate revolves around whether prolonged endurance exercise contributes to chronic cardiovascular disease and increased mortality risk [15].
As youth athletes undergo growth and engage in endurance training, cardiac remodeling takes place, encompassing physiological, structural, and functional myocardial adaptations in all four chambers of the heart [16][17]. While there are no specific data on the effects of marathon training or racing on cardiac changes in youth athletes, notable heart remodeling has been observed in boys aged 14–18 training for 10 h per week in triathlon, cycling, or rowing [18][19]. The observed cardiac changes included left ventricular dilatation and/or physiological myocardial hypertrophy in 18% and 5% of athletes, respectively [18][19]. While incidents of sudden cardiac death during exercise are documented in youth athletes, no recorded instances of cardiac-related fatalities have been observed in children participating in marathon races. Evaluating the long-term implications of repeated minor cardiac stress from marathon race participation is crucial [20].
A few studies have examined the cardiovascular system of youth athletes in cycling and cross-country skiing. Five athletes under the age of 18 and 10 adult finishers participated in a 21-day ultra-endurance cycling ride covering a total distance of 3515 km, with an average of 167 ± 72 km per day. The study, conducted during the event, revealed no cardiac problems in the youth riders, while the adults showed an increase in significant arrhythmias in the 24 h Holter monitoring [21]. Another extensive cohort study, involving 6258 cross-country skiers aged 15–24, similarly found no observed cardiac problems [22].
On the other hand, numerous studies have investigated the effects of marathon races on the cardiovascular system in adult marathon runners. Over the past 40 years, the number of participants running in a marathon race has risen 20-fold. In 2010, an estimated half-million runners completed a marathon in the United States [23]. Sudden cardiac death among marathon runners is very rare, with 1 event per 100,000 participants [23][24]. While the per-participant risk has remained constant over the decades, the absolute mortality rates have increased alongside the growing number of participants [23]. The final 1.5 km of the marathon race comprises less than 5% of the total distance of 42.195 m, yet it is responsible for nearly 50% of the sudden cardiac deaths that occur during the race [25].
The most common causes of sudden cardiac death during or after extreme exertion in adults younger than 30 years typically involve genetic factors, such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, anomalous coronary arteries, dilated cardiomyopathy, and congenital long syndrome. In athletes aged 30 years and older, coronary heart disease, acute myocardial infarction, and ischemia are primary contributors to exercise-related sudden cardiac death [26][27].

4. Training in Youth Runners (Ages 12–18)

Marathon races are characterized by an intensity below the anaerobic threshold and entail extensive training volumes [28][29]. Youth runners typically engage high training volumes, averaging around 57 km per week [30], exceeding the reported weekly volume of 22–27 km for high school cross-country runners [31]. While Krabak et al. [32] reported limited evidence suggesting that the running volume observed in high school cross-country runners may pose a risk factor for running-related injuries, the association between running volume and injuries in youth marathon runners remains unknown [33].
Around the age of 7 or 8, children who have an interest in running may begin participating in fun runs and organized track and field programs that typically last a few months each year. It is beneficial for aspiring distance runners to engage not only in middle-distance races but also in sprinting, jumping, and throwing events during this time [34]. Following the track season, it is important for them to diversify their activities by taking part in sports like soccer, basketball, and other youth sports that they enjoy. Encouraging participation in multiple sports is crucial for developing overall physical fitness before starting specialized training for track and cross-country events [34].
Youth runners under the age of 12 years are notably considered a high-risk group due to their immature musculoskeletal system [35] and the critical age of psychosocial development [36]. By the ages of 12 and 15 for most girls and boys, respectively, key developmental changes have typically occurred, enabling them to safely begin a low-mileage, low-intensity training regimen. This approach allows for gradual improvement over time. It is important to note that this does not imply that younger children should completely avoid participating in distance running [34]. Instead, the suggestion is to defer specialized year-round training. Furthermore, runners in this age group (12–15 years old) are classified as medium risk due to their psychological maturity, capacity to provide informed consent, and comparatively more developed musculoskeletal systems [37]. Youth runners aged 16–18 years are classified as low risk due to the maturation of their organ systems. This age category has demonstrated the highest success rates in completing marathon races [26].
The sports medicine community has responded to the growth in youth running participation by generating two consensus statements. The first international consensus statement, published in 2021 [32], was followed by a later consensus statement specifically addressing the safety of youth runners completing ultra-endurance events, typically spanning 50–161 km [33]. Both expert groups acknowledged the low level of evidence for reaching definitive conclusions across most health domains. Despite this, both documents underscore the recognized benefits of youth sports and offer practical recommendations. These guidelines aim to assist coaches and researchers in conducting individualized assessments to determine the appropriateness of participation in running events. According to Brenner et al. [38], in a review on pediatric overuse injury, there is no reason to prohibit participation in a well-organized marathon race, provided that the athlete derives enjoyment from the activity and remains asymptomatic.

5. Strength Training

Core, hip, and lower-extremity muscle weakness may contribute to injury risk in the youth runners, although there is conflicting evidence in the literature. For instance, in a cohort of high school cross-country runners, weak hip abductors were associated with anterior knee patellofemoral pain syndrome [39]. However, a study of high school cross-country runners showed improved race times following a 6-week pelvic and core strengthening program [39]. Finally, a recent meta-analysis of runners showed discrepancy between cross-sectional and prospective studies of hip weakness and patellofemoral pain, suggesting that hip weakness may be secondary to patellofemoral pain in some cases [40].
Strength training offers numerous benefits for youth runners. These include an improved cardiovascular risk profile, better weight control, decreased sports-related injuries, improved psychological wellbeing, and improved motor performance skills [37][41]. Targeted spine and hip strengthening exercises may be effective for rehabilitation and/or reduction in common running acute and overuse injuries. These injuries include Achilles tendinosis, ankle sprain, hamstring strain, patellofemoral pain, iliotibial band syndrome, and tibial bone stress injury [42]. The above exercises should incorporate running-specific functional movements. They should progress from double-leg to single-leg squats and hops, and eventually to more demanding plyometrics [43].

6. Sex Differences

Based on sex differences, there is a lack of published studies comparing health-related outcomes in boys and girls who complete marathon races. For instance, a 15-year prospective study of 3233 high school cross-country runners revealed higher injury rates among girls, with 16.7 injuries per 1000 athlete exposures, compared to 10.9 injuries per 1000 athlete exposures in boys [44]. Similarly, an 8-year prospective study of high school athletes found a higher rate of medical disqualification due to injury among girls compared to boys, with rates of 5.6 per 100,000 athlete exposures and 2.1 per 100,000 athlete exposures, respectively [45]. Moreover, a 20-year longitudinal study of middle school cross-country runners demonstrated higher injury rates and increased incidence of bone stress injuries [46][47]. Scheer et al. [33] reported that adolescent girls in cross-country face a greater risk of running-related injuries compared to boys. Longitudinal data also indicate a high lifetime prevalence of stress fractures among adults who participated in ultra-endurance running during their youth, although further research is needed [30].
To reduce the increased risk of injury among youth distance runners, it is recommended that they incorporate strength training, stretching, and foam rolling into their routine [48].

7. Footwear and Technique

There is a limited amount of research on running injuries in children concerning mechanics and footwear. On the other hand, studies in adults have shown that habitual running in minimal footwear with no cushioning or barefoot encourages a forefoot strike running pattern due to discomfort when landing on the heel [36][49]. This pattern offers various advantages, such as improved strength and stiffness of the Achilles tendon [50], reduced stress on the anterior shin [51], and decreased contract stress in the patellofemoral joint [52]. Additionally, Krabak et al. [43] reported that a forefoot strike pattern typically leads to an increased step rate, which, when raised by 7.5% to 10%, can significantly decrease load rates on the hip and knee running [53], while also correlating with a reduction in shin injuries among youth runners [54].
Many studies suggest that reduced shoe support may promote an increase in intrinsic foot muscle strength [55][56]. In the study by Rao and Joseph [57], the subjects are children and have shown that individuals who habitually go barefoot have a significantly lower incidence of pes planus compared to those who wear shoes. Moreover, adults who run in minimal shoes without support experience increased muscle size and presumed strength in the intrinsic and extrinsic foot muscles [58]. Conversely, runners using carbon fiber plate footwear have been observed to develop bone stress injuries [59]. Enhanced foot strength resulting from increased muscle size may offer protection against future foot and ankle injuries [58]. Overall, adopting a forefoot strike and increasing step rate have been associated with improved strength and decreased risk of common injuries in both youth and adult runners [51][56][60][61]. Perhaps starting youth runners in footwear that encourages a forefoot strike pattern may promote greater foot and ankle strength, potentially reducing the risk of future injuries [43].

8. Recommendations for Fitness Professionals or Practitioners and Coaches

The assessment and support of the training status and preparation for marathon races in youth athletes are crucial responsibilities of their coaches. It is widely accepted and recommended that youth athletes across all age groups undergo examination before participating in competitive sports [33]. Notably, youth runners under the age of 12 years constitute a high-risk group, given their immature musculoskeletal system [35] and the critical age in their psychosocial development [33]. Youth athletes aged between 12 and 15 years are classified as medium risk due to their psychological maturity, ability to provide informed consent, and more developed musculoskeletal systems, though it is noteworthy that peak height velocity typically occurs during this age range [37]. Despite this, bone growth may still outpace the maturation of the muscle–tendon–bone complex in youth runners [38][62], posing a potential risk to the musculoskeletal system [43]. Therefore, careful assessment is essential when considering these athletes for marathon participation. The 16–18-year-old youth athlete group, in the transition to adulthood, is categorized as low risk due to the physical maturation of organ systems. This age category has demonstrated the highest success rates in completing marathon races [33].
Among adult marathon runners, the most common musculoskeletal injuries include anterior knee pain, iliotibial band friction syndrome, tibial stress syndrome, plantar fasciitis, Achilles tendonitis, and meniscal injuries of the knee [63].
Based on the available evidence, this review suggests a multifaceted approach for children aspiring to participate in marathon races. Emphasis is placed on intrinsic motivation over external pressures, and children are empowered with the knowledge that they can cease participation at any point without facing repercussions. Parents are advised that marathon participation in childhood does not necessarily confer long-term competitive advantages. Instead, starting with shorter races and gradually progressing to longer distance is recommended [64], with readiness assessed based on individual growth and development [37][65]. Adequate rest, periodic breaks, and limited yearly participation are stressed to prevent overtraining and associated injuries. Nutritional supplementation with calcium and vitamin D is recommended to support bone health [66], and flexible, lightweight shoes are advocated to promote natural foot movement and reduce the risk of injury [54][56][61].

9. Pretraining Recommendations for Youth Runners

Guidelines and recommendations provided prior to initiating training are invaluable for coaches, fitness professionals, parents, and youth runners alike, serving as essential tools to ensure safe and effective training practices.
There is no conclusive evidence, either scientific or anecdotal, indicating that distance runners need to commence training at a young age in order to achieve their peak performance. Contrary to popular belief, most elite and world-class runners did not embark to their training journey until their mid to late teenage years. Furthermore, aside from a few rare exceptions, children who set age-group records from the 5 km to the marathon distance generally did not transition into elite adult runners. The recommendation is that children refrain from starting regular and specialized training for distance running until at least the early stages of puberty, typically around ages 11 to 13 [34]. This does not mean that children under the age of 11 should refrain from participating in running events; children of all ages should be encouraged to run for fun and, most importantly, for health.
Prior to puberty, the physiological responses to training are not always correlated with performance in long-distance events. Instead, the primary determinants of distance-running performance in prepubescent children are closely tried to their physical maturity. Children who are taller, stronger, and faster tend to outperform their peers in distance races, mirroring their success in other sports such as basketball, baseball, and soccer. While numerous children may naturally exhibit high levels of aerobic fitness, allowing them to partake in low-intensity endurance activities, their capacity to produce energy for high-intensity endeavors remains restricted. A consistent finding in pediatric exercise science indicates that the anaerobic system does not reach full development until after puberty [34].
During puberty, children experience notable physical transformations, prompting a recommendation to restrict training volume and intensity. Normal pubertal development can independently enhance running performance. For example, the growth spurt of the lungs and heart enhances oxygen-rich blood delivery to muscles, thereby naturally increasing VO2max. Additionally, elevated growth hormone levels enable stronger muscle contractions, enhancing running speed and efficiency [34]. Youth who are physically immature and engage in high volumes of intense training face a relatively high risk of injuries, abnormal growth and maturation, and psychological burnout. Instead, it is recommended to postpone regular training, defined as more than three days a week over periods of several months, and specialized training, which entails focusing exclusively on running rather than engaging in a variety of sports and physical activities [34].
Not all developmental changes automatically lead to an improvement in running performance. Excessive training during periods of rapid limb growth can heighten the risk of muscular and skeletal injuries in children [67][68]. During puberty, bones lengthen at each end, particularly in the soft tissue called epiphyseal growth plates. These growth plates, weaker than hardened bone, become susceptible to fractures under the heavy, repetitive stresses of long-distance running [69]. Excessive training before puberty can also influence hormones in ways that may disrupt normal maturation and optimal health [70]. Under certain conditions, such as suboptimal nutrition, female runners may not produce estrogen at regular levels during puberty, resulting in delayed menarche or irregular menstrual cycles [71].
Fortunately, the majority of youth runners instinctively avoid harmful levels of training, naturally stopping before reaching their limits [34]. However, there are at least a few self-motivated youth runners who push themselves to extremes, as well as coaches and parents who push youth runners too far. In such cases, running injuries become fairly common [1]. Another concern for those who specialize in running at a young age is psychological burnout [11]. Such extensive running leaves little time for activities other than school, sleeping, and eating. When training becomes this all-consuming, it ceases to be enjoyable, leading many young people to drop out of running [34].


  1. Smoliga, J.M.; Roberts, W.O.; Tenforde, A.S. Kids on the Run-Is Marathon Running Safe for Children? JAMA Pediatr. 2022, 176, 1066–1068.
  2. Bennell, K.L.; Malcolm, S.A.; Thomas, S.A.; Wark, J.D.; Brukner, P.D. The incidence and distribution of stress fractures in competitive track and field athletes. A twelve-month prospective study. Am. J. Sports Med. 1996, 24, 211–217.
  3. Lysholm, J.; Wiklander, J. Injuries in runners. Am. J. Sports Med. 1987, 15, 168–171.
  4. Macintyre, J.G.; Taunton, J.; Clement, D.B.; Lloyd-Smith, D.R.; Mckenzie, D.; Morrell, R.W. Running Injuries: A Clinical Study of 4173 Cases. Clin. J. Sport Med. 1991, 1, 81–87.
  5. Micheli, L.J. Overuse injuries in children’s sports: The growth factor. Orthop. Clin. N. Am. 1983, 14, 337–360.
  6. Roberts, W.O. Can children and adolescents run marathons? Sports Med. 2007, 37, 299–301.
  7. Caine, D.; DiFiori, J.; Maffulli, N. Physeal injuries in children’s and youth sports: Reasons for concern? Br. J. Sports Med. 2006, 40, 749–760.
  8. Wu, A.C.; Rauh, M.J.; DeLuca, S.; Lewis, M.; Ackerman, K.E.; Barrack, M.T.; Heiderscheit, B.; Krabak, B.J.; Roberts, W.O.; Tenforde, A.S. Running-related injuries in middle school cross-country runners: Prevalence and characteristics of common injuries. PMR 2022, 14, 793–801.
  9. Goldman, J.T.; Miller, E.; Runestad, S.; Serpa, R.; Beck, J. Should Adolescents Run Marathons?: Youth Marathon Training Injury Epidemiology and Risk Factors. Clin. J. Sport Med. 2022, 32, e293–e299.
  10. Rowland, T. Should Children Be Allowed to Run Marathon Races? A Virtual Roundtable. Pediatr. Exerc. Sci. 2006, 18, 1–10.
  11. Rice, S.G.; Waniewski, S. American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Committee on Sports Medicine and Fitness; International Marathon Medical Directors Association (IMMDA). Children and marathoning: How young is too young? Clin. J. Sport Med. 2003, 13, 369–373.
  12. Nelson, M.A.; Goldberg, B.; Harris, S.S. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Sports Medicine: Risks in distance running for children. Pediatrics 1990, 86, 799–800.
  13. Shaffer, T.E.; Coryllos, E.; Dyment, P.G.; Luckstead, E.F.; Murray, J.J.; Nathan, J.S.; Van Rooy, C.W. Risks in long-distance running for children. Phys. Sportsmed. 1982, 8, 82–86.
  14. Donnelly, J.E.; Hillman, C.H.; Castelli, D.; Etnier, J.L.; Lee, S.; Tomporowski, P.; Lambourne, K.; Szabo-Reed, A.N. Physical Activity, Fitness, Cognitive Function, and Academic Achievement in Children: A Systematic Review. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2016, 48, 1197–1222.
  15. Tiller, N.B.; Stewart, G.M.; Illidi, C.R.; Levine, B.D. Exercise is medicine? The cardiorespiratory implications of ultra-marathon. Curr. Sports Med. Rep. 2020, 19, 290–297.
  16. McClean, G.; Riding, N.R.; Ardern, C.L.; Farooq, A.; Pieles, G.E.; Watt, V.; Adamuz, C.; George, K.P.; Oxborough, D.; Wilson, M.G. Electrical and structural adaptations of the paediatric athlete’s heart: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Br. J. Sports Med. 2018, 52, 230.
  17. Pieles, G.E.; Stuart, A.G. The adolescent athlete’s heart; a miniature adult or grown-up child? Clin. Cardiol. 2020, 43, 852–862.
  18. Sharma, S.; Maron, B.J.; Whyte, G.; Firoozi, S.; Elliott, P.M.; McKenna, W.J. Physiologic limits of left ventricular hypertrophy in elite junior athletes: Relevance to differential diagnosis of athlete’s heart and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2002, 40, 1431–1436.
  19. Makan, J.; Sharma, S.; Firoozi, S.; Whyte, G.; Jackson, P.G.; McKenna, W.J. Physiological upper limits of ventricular cavity size in highly trained adolescent athletes. Heart 2005, 91, 495–499.
  20. Claessen, G.; La Gerche, A. Exercise-induced cardiac fatigue: The need for speed. J. Physiol. 2016, 594, 2781–2782.
  21. Wundersitz, D.; Williamson, J.; Nadurata, V.; Nolan, K.; Lavie, C.; Kingsley, M. The impact of a 21-day ultra-endurance ride on the heart in young, adult and older adult recreational cyclists. Int. J. Cardiol. 2019, 286, 137–142.
  22. Andersen, K.; Farahmand, B.; Ahlbom, A.; Held, C.; Ljunghall, S.; Michaëlsson, K.; Sundström, J. Risk of arrhythmias in 52 755 long-distance cross-country skiers: A cohort study. Eur. Heart J. 2013, 34, 3624–3631.
  23. O’Keefe, J.H.; Patil, H.R.; Lavie, C.J.; Magalski, A.; Vogel, R.A.; McCullough, P.A. Potential adverse cardiovascular effects from excessive endurance exercise. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2012, 87, 587–595.
  24. Kim, J.H.; Malhotra, R.; Chiampas, G.; d’Hemecourt, P.; Troyanos, C.; Cianca, J.; Smith, R.N.; Wang, T.J.; Roberts, W.O.; Thompson, P.D.; et al. Cardiac arrest during long-distance running races. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 366, 130–140.
  25. Sheppard, M.N. The fittest person in the morgue? Histopathology 2012, 60, 381–396.
  26. Albano, A.J.; Thompson, P.D.; Kapur, N.K. Acute coronary thrombosis in Boston marathon runners. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 366, 184–185.
  27. Maron, B.J.; Pelliccia, A.; Spirito, P. Cardiac disease in young trained athletes. Insights into methods for distinguishing athlete’s heart from structural heart disease, with particular emphasis on hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation 1995, 91, 1596–1601.
  28. Fornasiero, A.; Savoldelli, A.; Fruet, D.; Boccia, G.; Pellegrini, B.; Schena, F. Physiological intensity profile, exercise load and performance predictors of a 65-km mountain ultra-marathon. J. Sports Sci. 2017, 36, 1287–1295.
  29. Tan, P.L.; Tan, F.H.; Bosch, A.N. Assessment of differences in the anthropometric, physiological and training characteristics of finishers and non-finishers in a tropical 161-km ultra-marathon. Int. J. Exerc. Sci. 2017, 10, 465–478.
  30. Scheer, V.; Sousa, C.V.; Valero, D.; Knechtle, B.; Nikolaidis, P.T.; Valero, E. A descriptive study on health, training and social aspects of adults that participated in ultra endurance running as youth athletes. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fit. 2020.
  31. Tenforde, A.S.; Sayres, L.C.; McCurdy, M.L.; Collado, H.; Sainani, K.L.; Fredericson, M. Overuse injuries in high school runners: Lifetime prevalence and prevention strategies. PMR 2011, 3, 125–131.
  32. Krabak, B.J.; Roberts, W.O.; Tenforde, A.S.; Ackerman, K.E.; Adami, P.; Baggish, A.; Barrack, M.; Cianca, J.; Davis, I.; D’Hemecourt, P.; et al. Youth running consensus statement: Minimizing risks of injury and illness in youth runners. Br. J. Sports Med. 2021, 55, 305–318.
  33. Scheer, V.; Costa, R.J.S.; Doutreleau, S.; Knechtle, B.; Nikolaidis, P.T.; Roberts, W.O.; Stoll, O.S.; Tenforde, A.; Krabak, B. Recommendations on Youth Participation in Ultra-Endurance Running Events: A Consensus Statement. Sports Med. 2021, 51, 1123–1135.
  34. Greene, L.; Pate, R. Young Distance Runners, 3rd ed.; Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL, USA, 2015; pp. 5–7.
  35. MacKelvie, K.J.; Khan, K.M.; McKay, H.A. Is there a critical period for bone response to weight-bearing exercise in children and adolescents? a systematic review. Br. J. Sports Med. 2002, 36, 250–257.
  36. Wearing, S.C.; Hooper, S.L.; Dubois, P.; Smeathers, J.E.; Dietze, A. Force-deformation properties of the human heel pad during barefoot walking. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2014, 46, 1588–1594.
  37. Lloyd, R.S.; Oliver, J.L.; Faigenbaum, A.D.; Myer, G.D.; De Ste Croix, M.B. Chronological age vs. biological maturation: Implications for exercise programming in youth. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2014, 28, 1454–1464.
  38. Brenner, J.S. Sports Specialization and Intensive Training in Young Athletes. Pediatrics 2016, 138, e20162148.
  39. Luedke, L.E.; Heiderscheit, B.C.; Williams, D.S.; Rauh, M.J. Association of isometric strength of hip and knee muscles with injury risk in high school cross country runners. Int. J. Sports Phys. Ther. 2015, 10, 868–876.
  40. Rathleff, M.S.; Rathleff, C.R.; Crossley, K.M.; Barton, C.J. Is hip strength a risk factor for patellofemoral pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Sports Med. 2014, 48, 1088.
  41. Faigenbaum, A.D.; Kraemer, W.J.; Blimkie, C.J.; Jeffreys, I.; Micheli, L.J.; Nitka, M.; Rowland, T.W. Youth resistance training: Updated position statement paper from the national strength and conditioning association. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2009, 23, S60–S79.
  42. Tenforde, A.S.; Fredericson, M. Influence of sports participation on bone health in the young athlete: A review of the literature. PMR 2011, 3, 861–867.
  43. Krabak, B.J.; Tenforde, A.S.; Davis, I.S.; Fredericson, M.; Harrast, M.A.; d’Hemecourt, P.; Luke, A.C.; Roberts, W.O. Youth Distance Running: Strategies for Training and Injury Reduction. Curr. Sports Med. Rep. 2019, 18, 53–59.
  44. Rauh, M.J.; Margherita, A.J.; Rice, S.G.; Koepsell, T.D.; Rivara, F.P. High school cross country running injuries: A longitudinal study. Clin. J. Sport Med. 2000, 10, 110–116.
  45. Tirabassi, J.; Brou, L.; Khodaee, M.; Lefort, R.; Fields, S.K.; Comstock, R.D. Epidemiology of High School Sports-Related Injuries Resulting in Medical Disqualification: 2005–2006 through 2013–2014 Academic Years. Am. J. Sports Med. 2016, 44, 2925–2932.
  46. Beachy, G.; Rauh, M. Middle school injuries: A 20-year (1988–2008) multisport evaluation. J. Athl. Train. 2014, 49, 493–506.
  47. Changstrom, B.; Brill, J.; Hecht, S. Severe Exercise-Associated Hyponatremia in a Collegiate American Football Player. Curr. Sports Med. Rep. 2017, 16, 343–345.
  48. Stenerson, L.R.; Melton, B.F.; Bland, H.W.; Ryan, G.A. Running-Related Overuse Injuries and Their Relationship with Run and Resistance Training Characteristics in Adult Recreational Runners: A Cross-Sectional Study. J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. 2023, 8, 128.
  49. Khowailed, I.A.; Petrofsky, J.; Lohman, E.; Dahar, N. Six weeks habituation of simulated barefoot running induces neuromuscular adaptations and changes in foot strike patterns in female runners. Med. Sci. Monit. 2015, 21, 2021–2230.
  50. Arampatzis, A.; Karamanidis, K.; Morey-Klapsing, G.; De Monte, G.; Stafilidis, S. Mechanical properties of the triceps surae tendon and aponeurosis in relation to intensity of sport activity. J. Biomech. 2007, 40, 1946–1952.
  51. Diebal, A.R.; Gregory, R.; Alitz, C.; Gerber, J.P. Forefoot running improves pain and disability associated with chronic exertional compartment syndrome. Am. J. Sports Med. 2012, 40, 1060–1067.
  52. Roper, J.L.; Harding, E.M.; Doerfler, D.; Dexter, J.G.; Kravitz, L.; Dufek, J.S.; Mermier, C.M. The effects of gait retraining in runners with patellofemoral pain: A randomized trial. Clin. Biomech. 2016, 35, 14–22.
  53. Willy, R.W.; Buchenic, L.; Rogacki, K.; Ackerman, J.; Schmidt, A.; Willson, J.D. In-field gait retraining and mobile monitoring to address running biomechanics associated with tibial stress fracture. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2016, 26, 197–205.
  54. Luedke, L.E.; Heiderscheit, B.C.; Williams, D.S.; Rauh, M.J. Influence of step rate on shin injury and anterior knee pain in high school runners. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2016, 48, 1244–1250.
  55. Davis, I.S.; Bowser, B.J.; Mullineaux, D.R. Greater vertical impact loading in female runners with medically diagnosed injuries: A prospective investigation. Br. J. Sports Med. 2016, 50, 887–892.
  56. Davis, I.S. The re-emergence of the minimal running shoe. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2014, 44, 775–784.
  57. Rao, U.B.; Joseph, B. The influence of footwear on the prevalence of flat foot. A survey of 2300 children. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 1992, 74, 525–527.
  58. Chen, T.L.; Szee, L.K.; Davis, I.S.; Cheung, R.T. Effects of training in minimalist shoes on the intrinsic and extrinsic foot muscle volume. Clin. Biomech. 2016, 36, 8–13.
  59. Tenforde, A.; Hoenig, T.; Saxena, A.; Hollander, K. Bone Stress Injuries in Runners Using Carbon Fiber Plate Footwear. Sports Med. 2023, 53, 1499–1505.
  60. Maffulli, N.; Wong, J.; Almekinders, L.C. Types and epidemiology of tendinopathy. Clin. Sports Med. 2003, 22, 675–692.
  61. Zadpoor, A.A.; Nikooyan, A.A. The relationship between lower-extremity stress fractures and the ground reaction force: A systematic review. Clin. Biomech. 2011, 26, 23–28.
  62. Faulkner, R.A.; Davison, K.S.; Bailey, D.A.; Mirwald, R.L.; Baxter-Jones, A.D. Size-corrected BMD decreases during peak linear growth: Implications for fracture incidence during adolescence. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2006, 21, 1864–1870.
  63. Fredericson, M.; Misra, A.K. Epidemiology and aetiology of marathon running injuries. Sports Med. 2007, 37, 437–439.
  64. Fakhouri, T.H.; Hughes, J.P.; Burt, V.L.; Song, M.; Fulton, J.E.; Ogden, C.L. Physical activity in U.S. youth aged 12–15 years, 2012. NCHS Data Brief. 2014, 141, 1–8.
  65. Krabak, B.J.; Snitily, B.; Milani, C.J. Running Injuries During Adolescence and Childhood. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. N. Am. 2016, 27, 179–202.
  66. Mountjoy, M.; Sundgot-Borgen, J.; Burke, L.; Carter, S.; Constantini, N.; Lebrun, C.; Meyer, N.; Sherman, R.; Steffen, K.; Budgett, R.; et al. The IOC consensus statement: Beyond the female athlete triad-relative energy deficiency in sport (RED-S). Br. J. Sports Med. 2014, 48, 491–497.
  67. Roemmich, J.N.; Rogel, A.D. Physiology of growth and development. Its relationship to performance in the young athlete. Clin. Sports Med. 1995, 14, 483–502.
  68. Soliman, A.; De Sanctis, V.; Elalaily, R.; Bedair, S. Advances in pubertal growth and factors influencing it: Can we increase pubertal growth? Indian J. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014, 18 (Suppl. S1), S53–S62.
  69. Mirtz, T.A.; Chandler, J.P.; Eyers, C.M. The effects of physical activity on the epiphyseal growth plates: A review of the literature on normal physiology and clinical implications. J. Clin. Med. Res. 2011, 3, 1.
  70. Bertelloni, S.; Ruggeri, S.; Baroncelli, G.I. Effects of sports training in adolescence on growth, puberty and bone health. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2006, 22, 605–612.
  71. Carmichael, M.A.; Thomson, R.L.; Moran, L.J.; Wycherley, T.P. The Impact of Menstrual Cycle Phase on Athletes’ Performance: A Narrative Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 1667.
Subjects: Sport Sciences
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to :
View Times: 40
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 02 Apr 2024