Crop productivity worldwide is sensitive to significant changes in temperature and precipitation
[1][2][3]. Since 1880, average global temperatures have increased by about 1 °C and are predicted to increase by about 1.5 °C by 2050 and 2–4 °C by 2100
[4][5], necessitating the need to deploy heat-tolerant varieties that can produce greater yields under higher temperatures than the current level
[1][2][6]. Theoretically, changes in climatic conditions, such as rising temperature, precipitation, and CO
2 concentrations, could be beneficial by permitting the cultivation of some crops in certain regions
[1][7]. However, these changes will negatively affect the productivity of many crops in most geographies, unless adaptation measures are taken
[1]. Plants with the C3 photosynthetic pathway, such as cowpea (
Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp), should experience increases in photosynthesis with increases in atmospheric CO
2 [8][9]. The crop is a crucial food and nutritional security crop for humans and livestock and serves as a source of income for its value-chain actors, especially in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)
[10]. The utilisation of the crop is expected to rapidly increase in popularity due to its high protein content and relative resilience in harsh conditions compared with some other legumes. Despite the importance of the crop, its yield under farmers’ managed conditions is low, owing to a series of biotic and abiotic constraints
[10][11].
Heat stress is one of the major abiotic factors limiting cowpea productivity, and it is predicted to be more prevalent with current changing climatic conditions. Improved varieties with resilience in a changing climate and a set of characteristics preferred by value-chain actors are needed in cowpea-producing regions. The crop thrives in relatively high-temperature environments
[6][12][13] compared with other legumes. However, during its reproductive phase, cowpea is especially vulnerable to heat stress, resulting in significant yield losses
[6][14][15], even though most genotypes have substantially elevated temperature tolerance during the germination and vegetative phases
[15][16][17]. A 1 °C increase in night temperature above 16.5 °C between seedling emergence and first flowering has been observed to cause up to a 13.6% decrease in cowpea grain yield
[18][19]. If the night temperature exceeds 20 °C, cowpea’s pollen viability and anther dehiscence are greatly impaired, which could lead to a significant decrease or complete failure of the pod set
[15][20][21]. Heat-susceptible genotypes have exhibited a 12% decrease in first-flush grain yield per degree centigrade increase in average night temperature above 20 °C due to decreases in pod set and harvest index
[18]. Similarly, a 4–14% decrease in both pod set and grain yield per degree Celsius increase in night-time temperature above a threshold of 16.5 °C has been observed
[19][22]. These yield decreases were attributed to reductions in the proportions of flowers producing pods and the harvest index.
2. Impacts of Heat Stresses and Tolerance Mechanisms in Cowpea
Heat stress is often described as a condition of high temperatures that are sufficient to cause permanent damage to plant processes
[3], including shortening the time for photosynthetic contribution to seed production
[21][23]. Heat stress on most plants can impact functions through the direct effects of high tissue temperature or the indirect consequences of the high evaporative demand accompanying hot weather
[6][23]. Understanding the impact of heat stress is crucial for plant breeding because it relates to key adaptive, biochemical, morphological, physiological, and reproductive processes (
Figure 1), including molecular changes that adversely affect plant growth, productivity, and ultimately yield
[2][3][4]. Identifying the specific plant processes most susceptible to heat stress, whether it damages the photosynthetic source, reproductive sink, or both, is critical because it will determine which selection criterion will most likely enhance a species’ heat tolerance
[6].
Figure 1. Representative list of traits, processes, and functions impacted by heat stress in cowpea.
The magnitude of high temperature’s impact on plants depends on the intensity, length of exposure, and rate of temperature increase because many crop plants possess the ability to adapt to temperature conditions above the threshold for some time
[3][6][12]. From seedling to maturity, prolonged exposure to heat stress may increase its severity and trigger different response mechanisms than heat stress imposed at a particular developmental stage. Therefore, applying heat stress throughout the crop’s development cycle may be advisable to better understand the physiological and genetic basis of cowpea’s response to heat stress. High temperatures could impact seed germination and seedling survival for cowpea, especially when seeds are sown deep into the soil
[24] and in soils with high salinity
[17]. Even when cowpea seeds can survive up to 50 °C day temperatures with an adequate water supply and still produce substantial vegetative biomass
[6], their vegetative growth can be impacted negatively by heat stress
[9][15][21]. Elevated night temperatures damage various reproductive processes in cowpea (
Figure 1), such as floral bud development, pollen viability, anther indehiscence, embryo formation, pod set, and seed development, including abscission and/or suppression of floral buds, peduncles, flowers, and pods
[15][20][25], resulting in low flower numbers, pod set, and grain yield
[9][24][26].
The stage of the floral development most sensitive to high night temperature occurs 7–9 days before anthesis
[15][16]. Similarly, high night-time temperatures reduced the supply of sugars in the peduncles of heat-sensitive genotypes, resulting in poor pod sets
[26]. Heat-sensitive genotypes have been observed to experience restricted translocation of proline from anther walls to pollen under heat stress, which damages the reproductive organs
[27]. The low pollen viability, anther indehiscence, and poor pod set under high night temperatures have been attributed to premature degeneration of the tapetal layer and a lack of endothecium development
[20]. Later reports have demonstrated that complete suppression of the development of the floral buds could occur when there are two or more weeks of consecutive higher night temperatures during the first four weeks following germination
[26]. Earlier investigations documented that heat-induced suppression of floral buds occurs only under long days
[28]. However, certain genotypes exhibited suppression of floral buds, bud abortions, and retarded peduncle elongation during recent field screening conducted under high day and night temperatures (see
Figure 2) and short days at the Minjibir location in Nigeria. These genotypes produced very few or no flowers or pods, a behaviour thought to be occurring only under long-day conditions (Saba 2023, IITA, Kano, Nigeria, Personal observation).
Figure 2. Average monthly minimum and maximum temperature of typical cowpea production zones in Minjibir, Kano State in Northern Nigeria.
Heat stress tends to shorten some genotypes’ flowering and maturity time, which has a penalty on the yield. However, genotypes that initiate flowering before the onset of extreme heat may evade the adverse effects of such high temperatures
[29]. Rapid leaf senescence and maturity have been observed during pod filling in heat-sensitive genotypes when night temperatures are high
[9][25][30], resulting in decreased photosynthetic activity and yield because the plants tend to divert resources to deal with thermal stress, thereby limiting the resources for reproductive development
[21][31]. Thus, varieties that display delayed leaf senescence under heat stress conditions may possess more effective tolerance mechanisms
[32]. In addition, higher day and night temperatures significantly shorten the pod development period in both heat-sensitive and tolerant genotypes
[15][30], which reduces the time for pod filling and assimilates partitioning, ultimately reducing the varieties’ grain yield. Heat-susceptible genotypes experienced delayed flowering at night temperatures above 20 °C, likely due to heat-induced floral bud suppression or abortion, whereas heat-tolerant genes were found to enhance early pod production in hot environments by accelerating reproductive development and increasing pod set
[18].
Tolerance to heat stress can be attributed to two main factors: avoidance and tolerance. While heat avoidance involves the ability of plant tissues to maintain lower temperatures compared with control plants when exposed to elevated temperatures, heat tolerance refers to the plant’s ability to sustain essential functions even when its tissues are exposed to high-temperature conditions
[24]. Heat avoidance mechanisms encompass several processes, including transpirational cooling, leaf orientation and movement effects, variances in the reflection of solar radiation, and the shielding of sensitive tissues from sunburn through leaf shading
[24]. Three heat tolerance mechanisms have been described in regard to the above impacts of high temperatures on cowpea’s reproductive development
[29]. These are tolerance at the early floral bud stage that conferred the ability to produce flowers under hot, long-day (≥13 h day
−1) conditions
[33], which is influenced by phytochrome
[28]; tolerance during pollen and anther development that conferred the ability to set pods under high night temperatures
[15]; and tolerance during embryo development that conferred the ability to produce large numbers of seeds per pod under high day or night temperatures
[16].
3. Variability in Germplasm, Genetics, and Genomic Resources for the Improvement of Heat Stress Tolerance
Successful development of heat-tolerant varieties begins with the identification of sources of favourable alleles
[34]. Genotypic differences in cowpea germplasm for heat stress have been established, and studies have identified specific heat-tolerant lines, mostly under hot, long-day conditions (
Table 1). Examples of the exploration of genetic resources include Patel and Hall (1990)
[35], who assessed responses to high temperatures during the reproductive stage in hot fields and growth chambers and developed a genotypic classification system based on observed variations in floral bud emergence duration, abortion, peduncle elongation suppression, flower production, and podding among genotypes under long-day conditions (41/24 °C day/night)
[35] and grouped the accessions into eight categories based on these traits, including whether the peduncle had normal or suppressed elongation. The classification system provides insights into heat responses in genotypes that will aid in selecting parents for breeding heat-tolerant genotypes. Similarly, Ehlers and Hall (1996)
[36] evaluated African and USA genotypes under various temperatures and photoperiod conditions in the glasshouse, categorizing them into 11 groups based on photoperiod response, juvenility (minimum time taken for the appearance of floral buds under short days), and suppression of floral bud development and pod set under hot, long days. These kinds of classification systems are valuable for breeders and agronomists, as they can help understand the genetic variations related to these traits and aid in selecting appropriate genotypes with desired heat response traits for breeding programs targeting tropical and subtropical production environments
[36]. An example of the utility of this kind of finding is the registration of a cowpea genotype “Mouride” in Senegal as a heat-tolerant variety based on its earliness traits, reaching physiological maturity at 65 days, helping it to escape heat stress
[37].
Table 1. A representative list of heat-tolerant genotypes, traits assessed, and screening environments from various studies.
No. |
Tolerant Lines |
Key Traits Assessed 1 |
Screening Environments |
References |
1 |
Prima |
DTF, DTM, NOB, NPB, FP, NPP, PS, PP, and PDW |
Growth cabinets |
[12] |
2 |
TVu 4552, Prima, PI 204647 |
DTF, NFA, pollen viability, PCA, SR, ovule viability, NFDA, NFIA, IA, FPSB; NP SPP and other yield components |
Hot, long-day field and growth chambers |
[15] |
3 |
Prima, TVu 4552, UCR 204, PI 204647, 750-1, IT84D-448, IT84D-449, IT84S-2127, 7964 |
Days to first macroscopic floral bud, DTF, the extent of floral bud abortion, PDL, and PS |
Hot field and growth chambers |
[35] |
4 |
IT93K-452-1, IT98K-1111-1, IT93K-693-2, IT97K-472-12, IT97K-472-25 |
Pod and grain yield traits |
Hot field |
[34] |
5 |
Epace 10 and Marataoã |
Germination, shoot and root length, and seedling dry weight |
Germination chamber |
[17] |
6 |
TVu4552 and Prima |
Flower abscission (%), PP, SDWT, NSPP, and GYD |
Field supplemented with thermostats |
[30] |
7 |
Itaim |
DTF, DTM, physiological and biochemical traits, SDW, RDW, GYD, PDWT, PDL, PL, NPP, and NSP |
Growth chambers |
[21] |
8 |
Tapaihum |
PP, SPD, SDWT, SFW, and SDW |
Growth chambers |
[25] |
9 |
IT96D-610 |
Heat-shock proteins and other stress-protective proteins |
Glasshouse and field |
[38] |
10 |
Genotype H36 |
Leaf electrolyte leakage, NPP, PP, PHT, HI, GYD, and SDW |
Growth chambers, glasshouse, and hot field |
[39] |
11 |
IT97K-472-12, IT97K-472-25, IT97K-819-43, & IT97K-499-38 |
NF, PS, and GYD |
Field |
[40] |
12 |
Genotype 7964 |
Phenology, floral, pollen, pod, and other reproductive traits |
Greenhouses and growth chambers |
[20] |
13 |
NA * |
Phenology, floral, pollen, NPD, PDL and PS traits |
Growth chambers with supplemented lighting system |
[26] |
14 |
Genotypes 518 and 7964 |
Phenology; flower traits; PS; carbohydrate contents of the peduncle; starch in leaves, stems and peduncles; photosynthesis rate; leaf area; and shoot biomass yield |
Growth chambers |
[41] |
15 |
TN88-63, A73-2-1 and TVx 3236 |
NF, PS, and GYD |
Hot field |
[42] |
16 |
H36, 1393-2-1, H8-8-27, H8-14-12, H14-10-1N, and H35-5-10 |
PHT, SDW, NPP, SPP, SDWi, and HI |
Field |
[18] |
17 |
CB27 |
Flower production, and PP |
Hot field |
[43] |
18 |
TVu4552, Prima, H14-10-27, H14-10-23, H8-14-13, H8-8-4, H8-9-3, 518-2, B89-600, TN88-63 etc. |
DFF, NPP, NP, and GYD |
Greenhouses |
[44] |
19 |
Prima and TVu4552 |
NPP |
Field |
[45] |
20 |
518-22, Prima, TVu4552, H8-9-3, H8-8-4, H8-14-13, H14-10-23, H14-10-27 etc. |
Photoperiod response, DTF, PS, and GYD per plant |
Field and glasshouses |
[36] |
21 |
IAR-48, GEC, IT98K-277-2, Yacine, and IT98K-1092-1 |
DTF, Visual heat ratings, SDWTPP, PDWT, and Weight of 100 seeds. |
Field and glasshouse |
[46] |