Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 -- 1649 2024-01-24 13:59:02 |
2 layout & references Meta information modification 1649 2024-01-25 01:38:43 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Lisowski, P.; Glinicki, M.A. Processing Methods of Low-Clinker Multi-Component Cementitious Materials. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/54293 (accessed on 02 May 2024).
Lisowski P, Glinicki MA. Processing Methods of Low-Clinker Multi-Component Cementitious Materials. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/54293. Accessed May 02, 2024.
Lisowski, Paweł, Michał A. Glinicki. "Processing Methods of Low-Clinker Multi-Component Cementitious Materials" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/54293 (accessed May 02, 2024).
Lisowski, P., & Glinicki, M.A. (2024, January 24). Processing Methods of Low-Clinker Multi-Component Cementitious Materials. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/54293
Lisowski, Paweł and Michał A. Glinicki. "Processing Methods of Low-Clinker Multi-Component Cementitious Materials." Encyclopedia. Web. 24 January, 2024.
Processing Methods of Low-Clinker Multi-Component Cementitious Materials
Edit

The wide use of multi-component cement of highly reduced Portland clinker factor is largely impeded by detrimental changes in the rheological properties of concrete mixes, a substantial reduction in the early rate of cement hardening, and sometimes the insufficient strength of mature concrete. Therefore, major changes are needed in traditional concrete-production technologies if low-clinker cement is to gain wider acceptance. 

concrete mixing technology early-age properties low-clinker multi-component cement magnetized water microwave treatment non-clinker constituents ultrasound treatment

1. Introduction

Current developments in construction material technologies are associated with a widespread trend to reduce harmful environmental impacts during the production of materials and their use in buildings and structures. The life cycle analysis of materials in construction elements also covers the issues of the durability of materials—by extending the durability and the service life of structures, the desired effect of reducing the consumption of primary mineral resources can be achieved. Due to the massive use of Portland cement (PC) concrete in construction, the issue of the emissivity of PC cement production has become of great importance. With a simple reduction in the Portland clinker content in cement, whose carbon footprint is estimated at 0.98 kg CO2/kg clinker (the sum of process, fuel and electricity-related emissions), Gawlicki [1] allows for a substantial reduction in its carbon footprint. Therefore, technologies for the use of cement binders with a highly reduced clinker factor are being developed, using a variety of mineral components or industrial by-products as non-clinker cement constituents [2][3][4][5]. In accordance with the European standard EN 197-5 [6], the family of general-purpose cement has recently been expanded to include CEM II/C-M and CEM VI multi-component cement, allowing for an increased proportion of non-clinker main constituents, 36–50% and 51–65%, respectively. In many countries, the range of applicability of new types of cement has not been established yet, and their use is marginal [7][8]. Proske et al. [9] and Chen et al. [10] separately suggested more extreme proposals to limit the content of Portland clinker in cement to 20–35% or even 5%.
The main challenges preventing the greater use of multi-component cement with a low proportion of Portland clinker are related to detrimental changes in the rheological characteristics of concrete mix, a considerable decline in the early rate of cement hardening, and occasionally insufficient strength of mature concrete. The vulnerability of concrete to variations in ambient temperature and humidity, plastic shrinkage, the phenomenon of bleeding, and increased pressure of the concrete mix on the formwork are all increased by a delayed setting and very slow early hardening of the cement [1][2][3][4][5][11][12].
Moreover, a too-slow increase in concrete strength during the first day following casting restricts, if not outright prevents, the use of the slip-form construction technique; slows the removal and replacement of formwork at the construction site; extends the curing time; and delays other construction tasks that are carried out on already at least partially hardened concrete. Chemical admixtures are a very effective approach to adjusting the workability of the mix and expediting concrete’s hardening when used with conventional cement. However, new multi-component cement formulations require the development of specific admixtures for efficient control of the rheological properties of innovative concrete mixtures and their rate of early hardening [1][2][3][4][5][11][12].
Non-clinker constituents of multi-component cement basically consist of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) [13][14] that need to be selected and processed properly for their optimal efficiency. The SCMs’ fineness, level of clinker replacement, water-to-cementitious-materials ratio, and cement and SCM chemistry (the pozzolanic or hydraulic activity) are only a few of the variables that affect how reactive SCMs are in the cementitious system [13][14][15]. By modifying the rheological characteristics for a specific application, SCMs, such as granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) [16][17][18][19], Silica Fume (SF) [16][17][19][20], fly ash (FA) [16][17][21][22], bottom ash [21][23], copper slag [24], volcanic ash (VA) [18], and pulverized fuel ash (PFA) [18], can also increase rheological properties in addition to the mechanical properties and durability of concrete. SCMs may improve concrete characteristics primarily in two ways: by reacting with cement hydration products in the first instance and by improving particle packing efficiency in the second [13][14][15][25]. Nonetheless, the search for alternative SCMs has significantly intensified in recent years.
In order to use low-clinker cement more widely, significant changes are needed in traditional concrete-production technologies. For the objective of accelerating the early hardening of concrete in precast settings, there are further options to apply hygro-thermal treatment and even gamma irradiation [26][27] (only within radiation-controlled areas). When it comes to multi-component cement with a low clinker content, transmitting heat energy or gamma-ray energy to hardening concrete can also be a method to drive the hardening processes.
Interactions with non-ionizing radiation, such as magnetic interactions, microwaves, and ultrasonic waves, offer exciting possibilities for adding extra energy to concrete mixtures [28]. The potential of ultrasonic waves to carry out detailed diagnostics on the features of hardened concrete and even to demolish concrete is well recognized. Research on concrete constituents and mixtures has occasionally focused on the effects of microwaves, ultrasonic waves, and magnetic interactions. 

2. Ultrasound Treatment (US-T) Methodology

Power ultrasound with a frequency spectrum of 20 kHz–100 kHz finds numerous applications in chemistry and material processing due to its unique properties, which include cavitation, acoustic streaming, and sonochemistry [29][30][31]. US-T can initiate and accelerate chemical reactions through a phenomenon called acoustic cavitation. The rapid formation and collapse of small bubbles in a liquid create localized high temperatures and pressures, leading to enhanced reaction rates and yield. Ultrasonic waves can also disperse and de-agglomerate particles in suspensions, emulsions, and colloidal systems. The cavitation forces break down larger particles into smaller ones, leading to improved stability and homogeneity of the material [29][30][31].
Cavitational collapse produces deeply felt local heating (5000 °C), high pressures (1000 atm), and heating/cooling rates (>1010 °C s−1), thus creating individual conditions for different types of chemical and physical changes [32][33][34][35][36][37]. The acoustic power, frequency, hydrostatic pressure, the gas used, and reactor shape are only a few variables that may impact acoustic cavitation [32][33][34][35][36][37]. An intermediate-frequency ultrasound (between 100 and 1 MHz) encourages the production of hydroxyl radicals through regional hot spots caused by cavitation [32][33][34][35][36][37]. US-T can control crystal size distribution and reduce particle agglomeration due to more stable particles. It can help to direct the course of rapid crystallization processes in which the nuclei are produced due to acoustic cavitation process [33][38][39].

3. Magnetic Field Treatment (MF-T) Methodology

Magnetic Field Treatment (MF-T) can improve water’s properties by causing the separation of hydrogen nuclei (protons) and water “clusters” into single or smaller molecules due to strong magnetic forces [40][41][42][43]. The effectiveness of MF-T depends on the duration of exposure to the MF-T (water flow velocity), magnetic flux density, and volume of water exposed to the field [41][42]. Magnetized water (M-Water) is formed when water passes through a permanent MF-T, leading to molecular structural changes and new characteristics [40][42]. The M-Water layer surrounding cement particles becomes thinner, reducing the need for water during mixing and modifying the physical and chemical properties of M-Water, including surface tension, conductivity, pH, density, volatility, and the ability to alter dissolved substances [41][42][43]. M-Water also exhibits a lower viscosity than tap water due to a decreased bond angle (from 104.5° to 103°) [40][42][44].
The relationship between MF-T and the surface tension coefficient (σ) of M-Water is not monotonic [45]. The optimal MF-T is 300 mT, and both higher and lower intensities lead to an increase in the σ of M-Water, indicating an enhanced magnetization effect. The duration of magnetization varies with the MF-T intensity; stronger MF-T requires shorter treatment times, such as 3 min at 1000 mT and 20 s at 1500 mT [45]. Obtaining M-Water with lower ST is challenging at very high MF-T, and excessive magnetization may even lead to an increase in σ, as reported in Iino and Fujimura’s research [46]. The σ of tap water decreases considerably as the treatment duration increases, reaching a minimum of a 9% decline at 13 min with an MF-T of 1000 mT [47].

4. Microwave Treatment (MW-T) Methodology

Microwave treatment (MW-T) is the term for non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation with wavelengths between 1 mm and 1 m and spatial frequencies between 300 MHz (100 cm) and 300 GHz (0.1 cm) [48][49][50][51]. By rapidly attenuating MW-T through the intense vibration of polar molecules, it can increase the temperature of the material and accelerate chemical reactions. The entire specimen becomes heated as a consequence of the movement and friction this causes between molecules [51][52][53][54][55][56]. The frequencies of 915 MHz and 2450 MHz are currently mostly used on cement and concrete for industrial and scientific objectives [57]. Microwaves interact with matter more sensitively than ultrasonic and electromagnetism, which can penetrate dielectric materials and convert electromagnetic energy into heat energy without needing to first warm up a heating cavity. Microwave-absorbing materials generate volumetric heat as a result of the interaction between propagating waves [58][59][60]. Short reaction times, easy control, improved reaction kinetics, reduced heat loss, clean heating processes, good energy efficiency, and environmental protection are only a few advantages of MW-T over conventional heating techniques [56][61][62][63]. These heating qualities make it possible to cure concrete in an eco-friendly way.
Precast concrete, in particular, has undergone heat curing to expedite the development of strength [61][64]. The skin effect, which is produced by conventional heating methods and is more efficient for surface heating [48], is the fast evaporation of water from treated materials’ exterior surfaces. It is difficult to accomplish consistent heating because of the steep temperature gradient, and heated materials lose a large amount of energy through heat conduction and convection.
In contrast, MW-T may promote a temperature rise as a consequence of the polar molecules’ ability to absorb heat and form localized heating spots that are independent of position, which is beneficial to generating uniform volumetric heating [51][52][53][54][65]. The utilization of MW-T is based on the internal energy loss associated with the stimulation of molecular ions and dipoles under electromagnetic fields [66]. The specimens’ microwave heating characteristics can be varied by the secondary material’s propensity to absorb, transmit, or reflect MW-T [67]. It has been proven that microwave-assisted heating can cut processing times and lower the expenses of additive manufacturing [51][52][53][54][55][68][69]. Combining these approaches for the best materials processing could be plausible, and it would follow the properties of power ultrasound, microwave, and magnetic processing stated in the preceding chapters.

References

  1. Gawlicki, M. Belite in Cements with Low Emission of CO2 during Clinker Formation. Cem. Wapno Beton. 2020, 25, 348–357.
  2. Palm, S.; Müller, C.; Proske, T.; Rezvani, M.; Graubner, C.-A. Concrete Application of Clinker-Efficient Cements. Adv. Cem. Res. 2019, 31, 225–234.
  3. Müller, C.; Severins, K.; Spanka, G. Crushed sand as a main cement constituent-guidelines for future use in cement and concrete. Cem. Int. 2019, 17, 38–61.
  4. Zajac, M.; Skocek, J.; Durdzinski, P.; Bullerjahn, F.; Skibsted, J.; Ben Haha, M. Effect of Carbonated Cement Paste on Composite Cement Hydration and Performance. Cem. Concr. Res. 2020, 134, 106090.
  5. Palm, S.; Proske, T.; Rezvani, M.; Hainer, S.; Müller, C.; Graubner, C.A. Cements with a High Limestone Content—Mechanical Properties, Durability and Ecological Characteristics of the Concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 119, 308–318.
  6. BS EN 197-5; Cement—Part 5: Portland-Composite Cement CEM II/C-M and Composite Cement CEM VI. British Standards Institution: Loughborough, UK, 2021.
  7. Gu, Y.; Bary, B.; Machner, A.; De Weerdt, K.; Bolte, G.; Ben Haha, M. Multi-Scale Strategy to Estimate the Mechanical and Diffusive Properties of Cementitious Materials Prepared with CEM II/C-M. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2022, 131, 104537.
  8. Müller, C.; Palm, S.; Hermerschmidt, W. Durability properties of concretes using CEM II/C-M (S-LL) and CEM II/B-LL cements. Cem. Int. 2020, 18, 52–62.
  9. Proske, T.; Rezvani, M.; Palm, S.; Müller, C.; Graubner, C.A. Concretes Made of Efficient Multi-Composite Cements with Slag and Limestone. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2018, 89, 107–119.
  10. Chen, H.; Hou, P.; Zhou, X.; Black, L.; Adu-Amankwah, S.; Feng, P.; Cui, N.; Glinicki, M.A.; Cai, Y.; Zhang, S.; et al. Toward Performance Improvement of Supersulfated Cement by Nano Silica: Asynchronous Regulation on the Hydration Kinetics of Silicate and Aluminate. Cem. Concr. Res. 2023, 167, 107117.
  11. Chen, L.; Su, R.K.L. Experimental and Numerical Investigations on Macrocell Corrosion of Partially Carbonated Reinforced Concrete with Supplementary Cementitious Materials. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2023, 135, 104827.
  12. von Greve-Dierfeld, S.; Lothenbach, B.; Vollpracht, A.; Wu, B.; Huet, B.; Andrade, C.; Medina, C.; Thiel, C.; Gruyaert, E.; Vanoutrive, H.; et al. Understanding the Carbonation of Concrete with Supplementary Cementitious Materials: A Critical Review by RILEM TC 281-CCC. Mater. Struct. 2020, 53, 136.
  13. Juenger, M.C.G.; Siddique, R. Recent Advances in Understanding the Role of Supplementary Cementitious Materials in Concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 2015, 78, 71–80.
  14. Lothenbach, B.; Scrivener, K.; Hooton, R.D. Supplementary Cementitious Materials. Cem. Concr. Res. 2011, 41, 1244–1256.
  15. Suraneni, P.; Hajibabaee, A.; Ramanathan, S.; Wang, Y.; Weiss, J. New Insights from Reactivity Testing of Supplementary Cementitious Materials. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2019, 103, 331–338.
  16. Shah, I.H.; Miller, S.A.; Jiang, D.; Myers, R.J. Cement Substitution with Secondary Materials Can Reduce Annual Global CO2 Emissions by up to 1.3 Gigatons. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 5758.
  17. Saleh Ahari, R.; Kemal Erdem, T.; Ramyar, K. Effect of Various Supplementary Cementitious Materials on Rheological Properties of Self-Consolidating Concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 75, 89–98.
  18. Escalante-García, J.I.; Sharp, J.H. The Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Blended Cements Hydrated at Various Temperatures. Cem. Concr. Res. 2001, 31, 695–702.
  19. Ozturk, M.; Karaaslan, M.; Akgol, O.; Sevim, U.K. Mechanical and Electromagnetic Performance of Cement Based Composites Containing Different Replacement Levels of Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag, Fly Ash, Silica Fume and Rice Husk Ash. Cem. Concr. Res. 2020, 136, 106177.
  20. Harbec, D.; Tagnit-Hamou, A.; Gitzhofer, F. Waste-Glass Fume Synthesized Using Plasma Spheroidization Technology: Reactivity in Cement Pastes and Mortars. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 107, 272–286.
  21. Dilissen, N.; Vleugels, J.; Vermeiren, J.; García-Baños, B.; Marín, J.R.S.; Catalá-Civera, J.M. Temperature Dependency of the Dielectric Properties of Hydrated and Ordinary Portland Cement and Their Constituent Phases at 2.45 GHz up to 1100 °C. Cem. Concr. Res 2023, 165, 107067.
  22. Vrdoljak, I.; Varevac, D.; Miličević, I.; Čolak, S. Concrete-Based Composites with the Potential for Effective Protection against Electromagnetic Radiation: A Literature Review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 326, 126919.
  23. Sáez del Bosque, I.F.; Medina, J.M.; Frías, M.; Sánchez de Rojas, M.I.; Medina, C. Use of Biomass-Fired Power Plant Bottom Ash as an Addition in New Blended Cements: Effect on the Structure of the C-S-H Gel Formed during Hydration. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 228, 117081.
  24. Guo, H.; Wang, Z.; An, D.; Huo, J. Collaborative Design of Cement-Based Composites Incorporated with Cooper Slag in Considerations of Engineering Properties and Microwave-Absorbing Characters. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 283, 124614.
  25. Ghafari, E.; Ghahari, S.A.; Costa, H.; Júlio, E.; Portugal, A.; Durães, L. Effect of Supplementary Cementitious Materials on Autogenous Shrinkage of Ultra-High Performance Concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 127, 43–48.
  26. Glinicki, M.A.; Dąbrowski, M.; Antolik, A.; Dziedzic, K.; Sikorin, S.; Fateev, V.; Povolansky, E. Gamma Irradiation Sensitivity of Early Hardening Cement Mortar. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2022, 126, 104327.
  27. Dąbrowski, M.; Glinicki, M.A.; Dziedzic, K.; Jóźwiak-Niedźwiedzka, D.; Sikorin, S.; Fateev, V.S.; Povalansky, E.I. Early Age Hardening of Concrete with Heavy Aggregate in Gamma Radiation Source—Impact on the Modulus of Elasticity and Microstructural Features. J. Adv. Concr. Technol. 2021, 19, 555–570.
  28. De Schutter, G.; Lesage, K. Active Control of Properties of Concrete: A (p)Review. Mater. Struct. 2018, 51, 123.
  29. Lott, M.; Remillieux, M.C.; Garnier, V.; Ulrich, T.J.; Le Bas, P.Y.; Deraemaeker, A.; Dumoulin, C.; Payan, C. Fracture Processes Imaging in Concrete Using Nonlinear Ultrasound. NDT E Int. 2021, 120, 102432.
  30. Ganjian, E.; Ehsani, A.; Mason, T.J.; Tyrer, M. Application of Power Ultrasound to Cementitious Materials: Advances, Issues and Perspectives. Mater. Des. 2018, 160, 503–513.
  31. Ehsani, A.; Ganjian, E.; Mason, T.J.; Tyrer, M.; Bateman, M. Insights into the Positive Effects of Power Ultrasound on the Pore Solution of Portland Cement Pastes. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2022, 125, 104302.
  32. Colmenares, J.C. Sonication-Induced Pathways in the Synthesis of Light-Active Catalysts for Photocatalytic Oxidation of Organic Contaminants. ChemSusChem 2014, 7, 1512–1527.
  33. Hangxun, X.; Zeiger, B.W.; Suslick, K.S. Sonochemical Synthesis of Nanomaterials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 2555–2567.
  34. Lisowski, P.; Colmenares, J.C.; Mašek, O.; Lisowski, W.; Lisovytskiy, D.; Grzonka, J.; Kurzydłowski, K. Design and Fabrication of TiO2/Lignocellulosic Carbon Materials: Relevance of Low-Temperature Sonocrystallization to Photocatalysts Performance. ChemCatChem 2018, 10, 3469–3480.
  35. Lisowski, P.; Colmenares, J.C.; Mašek, O.; Lisowski, W.; Lisovytskiy, D.; Kamińska, A.; Łomot, D. Dual Functionality of TiO2/Biochar Hybrid Materials: Photocatalytic Phenol Degradation in the Liquid Phase and Selective Oxidation of Methanol in the Gas Phase. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 6274–6287.
  36. Colmenares, J.C.; Varma, R.S.; Lisowski, P. Sustainable Hybrid Photocatalysts: Titania Immobilized on Carbon Materials Derived from Renewable and Biodegradable Resources. Green. Chem. 2016, 18, 5736–5750.
  37. Chatel, G.; Novikova, L.; Petit, S. How Efficiently Combine Sonochemistry and Clay Science? Appl. Clay Sci. 2016, 119, 193–201.
  38. Sander, J.R.G.; Zeiger, B.W.; Suslick, K.S. Sonocrystallization and Sonofragmentation. Ultrason. Sonochem 2014, 21, 1908–1915.
  39. Luque de Castro, M.D.; Priego-Capote, F. Ultrasound-Assisted Crystallization (Sonocrystallization). Ultrason. Sonochem 2007, 14, 717–724.
  40. Ramalingam, M.; Narayanan, K.; Masilamani, A.; Kathirvel, P.; Murali, G.; Vatin, N.I. Influence of Magnetic Water on Concrete Properties with Different Magnetic Field Exposure Times. Materials 2022, 15, 4291.
  41. Ibrahim, E.M.; Abbas, Z.K. Effect of Magnetic Water on Strength Properties of Concrete. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 1067, 012002.
  42. Ghorbani, S.; Sharifi, S.; de Brito, J.; Ghorbani, S.; Jalayer, M.A.; Tavakkolizadeh, M. Using Statistical Analysis and Laboratory Testing to Evaluate the Effect of Magnetized Water on the Stability of Foaming Agents and Foam Concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 207, 28–40.
  43. Mohammadnezhad, A.; Azizi, S.; Sousanabadi Farahani, H.; Tashan, J.; Habibnejad Korayem, A. Understanding the Magnetizing Process of Water and Its Effects on Cementitious Materials: A Critical Review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 356, 129076.
  44. Ghazy, M.F.; Abd Elaty, M.A.A.; Daboun, O. Fracture Properties of Self-Compacting Fiber-Reinforced Concrete. Chall. J. Concr. Res. Lett. 2020, 11, 112.
  45. Liu, J.; Cao, Y. Experimental Study on the Surface Tension of Magnetized Water. Int. Commun. Heat. Mass. Transf. 2021, 121, 105091.
  46. Iino, M.; Fujimura, Y. Surface Tension of Heavy Water under High Magnetic Fields. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 261902.
  47. Cai, R.; Yang, H.; He, J.; Zhu, W. The Effects of Magnetic Fields on Water Molecular Hydrogen Bonds. J. Mol. Struct. 2009, 938, 15–19.
  48. Sun, Y.; Zhang, P.; Hu, J.; Liu, B.; Yang, J.; Liang, S.; Xiao, K.; Hou, H. A Review on Microwave Irradiation to the Properties of Geopolymers: Mechanisms and Challenges. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 294, 123491.
  49. Zhang, H.; Wei, W.; Shao, Z.; Qiao, R. The Investigation of Concrete Damage and Recycled Aggregate Properties under Microwave and Conventional Heating. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 341, 127859.
  50. Wei, W.; Shao, Z.; Qiao, R.; Chen, W.; Zhang, P.; Cheng, J. Workability and Mechanical Properties of Microwave Heating for Recovering High Quality Aggregate from Concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 276, 122237.
  51. Pan, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, S. Effects of Isothermal Microwave Curing on Steel Fibre-Reinforced Reactive Powder Concrete: Strength, Microstructure and Hydration Products. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 302, 124435.
  52. Tang, T.; Cai, L.; You, K.; Liu, M.; Han, W. Effect of Microwave Pre-Curing Technology on Carbide Slag-Fly Ash Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (CS-FA AAC): Porosity Rough Body Formation, Pore Characteristics and Hydration Products. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 263, 120112.
  53. Li, Y.; Yu, J.; Cao, Z.; He, P.; Liu, Q.; Han, X.; Wan, Y. Preparation and Application of Novel Microcapsules Ruptured by Microwave for Self-Healing Concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 304, 124616.
  54. Ma, G.; Sun, J.; Aslani, F.; Huang, Y.; Jiao, F. Review on Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Capacity Improvement of Cementitious Material. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 262, 120907.
  55. Luo, S.; Zhao, M.; Jiang, Z.; Liu, S.; Yang, L.; Mao, Y.; Pan, C. Microwave Preparation and Carbonation Properties of Low-Carbon Cement. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 320, 126239.
  56. Makul, N. Innovative Hybrid Curing Method for Accelerating the Strength of High-Performance Cement Paste Using Microwave Heating Coupling with Low-Pressure Processing. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 105, 245–252.
  57. Abu-Saleem, M.; Zhuge, Y.; Hassanli, R.; Ellis, M.; Rahman, M.M.; Levett, P. Microwave Radiation Treatment to Improve the Strength of Recycled Plastic Aggregate Concrete. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2021, 15, e00728.
  58. Chen, W.; Shao, Z.; Wei, W.; Zhang, P.; Hong, Y. Properties of Concrete Incorporating Microwave Treated Coarse Aggregate: An Experimental Study. Structures 2021, 33, 693–702.
  59. Makul, N.; Rattanadecho, P.; Agrawal, D.K. Microwave Curing at an Operating Frequency of 2.45 GHz of Portland Cement Paste at Early-Stage Using a Multi-Mode Cavity: Experimental and Numerical Analysis on Heat Transfer Characteristics. Int. Commun. Heat. Mass. Transf. 2010, 37, 1487–1495.
  60. Xiao, Q.; Long, G.; Feng, R.; Zeng, X.; Dong, R.; Xiang, Y.; Yang, K. Effect of Alternating Current Field on Rheology of Fresh Cement-Based Pastes. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 48, 103771.
  61. Liu, X.; Sun, D.; Liu, D.; Meng, K.; Ni, C.; Shao, Z.; Sun, L. Simulation of Ultrasonic Propagation in Porous Cellular Concrete Materials. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 285, 122852.
  62. Liu, X.; Zhao, Y.; Wei, Z.; Zhang, D. Microwave Absorption Enhancement of Asphalt Concrete with SiC-Fe3O4 Mixtures Modifier. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 254, 119209.
  63. Wang, F.; Zhu, H.; Shu, B.; Li, Y.; Gu, D.; Gao, Y.; Chen, A.; Feng, J.; Wu, S.; Liu, Q.; et al. Microwave Heating Mechanism and Self-Healing Performance of Asphalt Mixture with Basalt and Limestone Aggregates. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 342, 127973.
  64. Buttress, A.J.; Jones, D.A.; Dodds, C.; Dimitrakis, G.; Campbell, C.J.; Dawson, A.; Kingman, S.W. Understanding the Scabbling of Concrete Using Microwave Energy. Cem. Concr. Res. 2015, 75, 75–90.
  65. Tinoco, I.V.; Pinto, R.C.d.A. Evaluation of Stiffness Loss of Reinforced Concrete Beams Using the Diffuse Ultrasound Method. Ultrasonics 2021, 117, 106540.
  66. Rattanadecho, P.; Suwannapum, N.; Chatveera, B.; Atong, D.; Makul, N. Development of Compressive Strength of Cement Paste under Accelerated Curing by Using a Continuous Microwave Thermal Processor. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2008, 472, 299–307.
  67. Zhang, P.; Wei, W.; Shao, Z. Multifield Coupling Study on Random Aggregate Concrete under Microwave Irradiation. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 318, 126025.
  68. Leung, C.K.Y.; Pheeraphan, T. Microwave Curing of Portland Cement Concrete: Experimental Results and Feasibility for Practical Applications. Constr. Build. Mater. 1995, 9, 67–73.
  69. Trigos, L.; Escavy, J.I.; Gallego, J.; Gulisano, F. Natural Factors Related to the Differential Heating of Aggregates Exposed to Microwaves. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 314, 125654.
More
Information
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register : ,
View Times: 131
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 25 Jan 2024
1000/1000