Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 -- 1480 2024-01-24 10:57:18 |
2 layout + 2 word(s) 1482 2024-01-25 04:00:33 | |
3 layout Meta information modification 1482 2024-01-29 01:36:45 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Emadi Andani, M.; Lotfalian, B.; Moshayedi, A.J. Forward Head Posture and Biofeedback. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/54279 (accessed on 18 May 2024).
Emadi Andani M, Lotfalian B, Moshayedi AJ. Forward Head Posture and Biofeedback. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/54279. Accessed May 18, 2024.
Emadi Andani, Mehran, Bahar Lotfalian, Ata Jahangir Moshayedi. "Forward Head Posture and Biofeedback" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/54279 (accessed May 18, 2024).
Emadi Andani, M., Lotfalian, B., & Moshayedi, A.J. (2024, January 24). Forward Head Posture and Biofeedback. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/54279
Emadi Andani, Mehran, et al. "Forward Head Posture and Biofeedback." Encyclopedia. Web. 24 January, 2024.
Forward Head Posture and Biofeedback
Edit

Forward Head Posture (FHP) is when the head leans forward due to factors such as heavy backpacks or poor computer ergonomics. FHP can lead to neck strain and discomfort as well as potential long-term issues such as arthritis. Treatment options include specialized exercises, orthopedic devices, manual therapy, physical exercises, and visual feedback techniques, along with guidance from specialists in physical medicine and rehabilitation. In this study, a visual feedback-based approach was used to address FHP in female students. 

forward head posture visual feedback bio-feedback Arduino UNO 3D accelerometer healthcare

1. Introduction

One of the prevailing issues concerning bodily posture pertains to the phenomenon of Forward Head Posture (FHP). FHP is a condition characterized by the forward positioning of the head in relation to the shoulders and spine. In light of the predominant nature of human interaction occurring anteriorly vis-à-vis the countenance, protracted engagements with computer usage, television consumption, video game indulgence, unforeseen mishaps, or the protracted carriage of backpacks have been identified as potential antecedents to the proclivity of cranial inclination towards the anterior plane [1].

2. Forward Head Posture Reasons and Causes

In the broad spectrum of causative elements contributing to this phenomenon, a succinct enumeration of pivotal determinants is presented in the following sections: Backpack Overloading [2], Computer Utilization Ergonomics [3], Traumatic Incidents [4], Ocular Impairment [5], and Ambulation Anomalies [6]. Notably, this constellation of secondary effects encompasses an array of deleterious consequences, including but not limited to those delineated in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Comparing forward head (red) and correct head (green) positions: A, Tragus; B, 𝛼 (Head/Neck angle); C, C7 (seventh cervical vertebra).
In an optimal scenario, the cranial region should be impeccably aligned with the cervical and scapular regions, akin to the harmonious equilibrium of a golf ball atop its pedestal. In stark contrast, the human cranium presents a significantly heftier mass, more akin to that of a bowling ball; consequently, the anterior inclination of the head imposes a substantial biomechanical strain on the cervical and dorsal musculature. It is noteworthy that the gravitational burden on the cervical spine escalates for every increment of the anterior displacement of the cranium, as reported in Table 1 [7].
As delineated in Table 1, each increment of 15 degrees in the anterior displacement of the head imposes an excessive load akin to the initial pressure upon the cervical region [7].
Consequently, this increased pressure engenders cervical weariness and concomitant persistent or predominant cervical discomfort. The musculature spanning the cervical and scapular regions is entrusted with the perpetual sustenance of this burdensome load, and sustains an isometric contraction, culminating in hemodynamic impairment, tissue trauma, and exhaustion ultimately manifesting as elongation, soreness, a burning sensation, and fibromyalgia [8]. Furthermore, the anterior inclination of the head and neck precipitates the erasure of the inherent cervical lordosis, thereby compromising the integrity of the intervertebral discs and potentially fostering premature arthritic degeneration [9].

3. Treatment Modalities and Strategies

The initial phase of addressing ailments related to the head and neck necessitates thorough evaluation by a specialist in physical medicine and rehabilitation complemented by radiographic assessments to gauge the progression of the condition. Subsequent to this comprehensive assessment, a tailored treatment regimen is prescribed encompassing specialized exercises and an array of therapeutic interventions. Several therapeutic modalities warrant consideration, including stretching and strengthening regimens, offered by a physical medicine and rehabilitation specialist as a series of exercises [10], utilization of a bespoke orthopedic apparatus such as an orthopedic device (e.g., braces or lumbar supports) designed to facilitate optimal bodily posture [11], manual techniques such as the application of massage therapy [12], structured physical exercises or corrective movements [13][14], and biofeedback techniques such as therapeutic–educational modalities wherein individuals are instructed on the volitional regulation of innate autonomic physiological functions to influence overall bodily wellbeing [15].

4. Biofeedback

Biofeedback, in its canonical manifestation, emerges as a therapeutic method underpinned by the sophisticated apparatus of modern electronics, serving as a conduit for the comprehensive measurement and intricate analysis of the multifarious neural, muscular, and autonomic processes inherent to the human corpus [16]. These invaluable insights gleaned from the depths of biofeedback instrumentation are subsequently imparted to the patient and their medical practitioner(s) through the medium of auditory or visual feedback, culminating in a symbiotic dyad of informed collaboration [17][18][19]. For patients, the biofeedback apparatus functions as a quasi-sensorial adjunct, affording them the rarefied capacity to perceive and cognize the inner workings of their corporeal vessel [20]. In a notable example, someone using a blood pressure monitor can actually lower their own blood pressure by simply concentrating on the screen [21]. When acquiring skills such as biking, driving, or sports, this unspoken skill of blood pressure control combines mental and physical aspects. It is developed through trial and error, hands-on learning, and dedicated practice [22]. Biofeedback equipment translates physiological signals into audio–visual feedback, aiding in the treatment of various conditions including neurological and muscular issues, tension-related problems, and gastrointestinal disorders [23]. These devices are temporary tools for learning and experimentation, becoming unnecessary when proficiency is attained. Biofeedback is particularly effective in cases where pharmaceutical interventions fall short [24].
A recent paper [25] introduced a biofeedback system using an accelerometer. In a five-hour study with six participants, the authors found that the system significantly reduced time spent in poor posture. The biofeedback system interfaced with a computer and provided real-time feedback on the user’s neck angle through a visual display and auditory cues. While initial sessions recorded neck movements without feedback, subsequent sessions with active biofeedback showed improved posture. It is worth noting that continuous use of the biofeedback system was required in order to maintain good posture, and there was no information on lasting effects after the study.
In [26], researchers introduced an innovative biofeedback system with a camera on a computer monitor, auditory cues, and a tactile feedback necklace. Participants read on their computers with the option of using auditory or tactile feedback. Results showed improved neck angles with both feedback methods, and there was a significant change in neck angle even without feedback. While this study demonstrated the rapid effectiveness of biofeedback within a single 90-min session, the long-term benefits remain uncertain. In [27], the authors suggested that individuals can learn to improve their head and neck posture through the use of a biofeedback system. The system continuously monitors head and neck alignment, providing real-time feedback through a smartphone app. It uses signals such as sounds, music, vibrations, and flashes to warn users about poor posture. Data collected are securely stored and can be shared with healthcare professionals; however, the device does not quantify the extent of posture improvement, highlighting the need for web services to access comprehensive data.
In another study, [28] used neurofeedback to improve neck posture in individuals with forward head syndrome. Participants were split into two groups, one receiving neurofeedback training and the other acting as a control. Both groups underwent a four-week, thrice-weekly program that included unique activities such as pottery and brainwave-controlled archery to enhance concentration. After the training, the neurofeedback group showed significant improvements in neck mobility, as documented through post-training assessments.
In [29], a study was conducted in which participants performed a one-hour typing task twice, once with biofeedback and once without. The researchers attached the biofeedback device to the participants and instructed them on maintaining an upright posture. Using motion analysis and discomfort assessments, this study found that the biofeedback device significantly improved the posture of individuals experiencing neck discomfort during computer-related tasks. Forward head posture is a common issue with potential health risks, and various treatments have been explored. Common biofeedback methods are reviewed in Table 2, although biofeedback can refer to other devices as well [30][31].
Table 2. Biofeedback methods and principle.
In terms of performance, according to the Table 2, advanced sEMG and VR/AR methods provide more complete feedback but are less accessible due to their complexity. On the other hand, wearable sensors and visual and auditory feedback devices have slightly different performance, are more accessible, and are more popular while requiring less specific settings [38].

References

  1. Yip, C.H.T.; Chiu, T.T.W.; Poon, A.T.K. The relationship between head posture and severity and disability of patients with neck pain. Man. Ther. 2008, 13, 148–154.
  2. Chansirinukor, W.; Wilson, D.; Grimmer, K.; Dansie, B. Effects of backpacks on students: Measurement of cervical and shoulder posture. Aust. J. Physiother. 2001, 47, 110–116.
  3. Kang, J.H.; Park, R.Y.; Lee, S.J.; Kim, J.Y.; Yoon, S.R.; Jung, K.I. The effect of the forward head posture on postural balance in long time computer based worker. Ann. Rehabil. Med. 2012, 36, 98–104.
  4. Kullgren, A.; Krafft, M.; Nygren, Å.; Tingvall, C. Neck injuries in frontal impacts: Influence of crash pulse characteristics on injury risk. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2000, 32, 197–205.
  5. Daneshmandi, H.; Majalan, A.S.; Babakhani, M. The comparison of head and neck alignment in children with visual and hearing impairments and its relation with anthropometrical dimensions. Phys. Treat. 2014, 4, 69–76.
  6. Guevara, C.; Jadán-Guerrero, J.; Bonilla-Jurado, D.; Salvador-Ullauri, L.; Acosta-Vargas, P.; Calle-Jimenez, T.; Lara-Alvarez, P. Fuzzy Model for Back Posture Correction During the Walk. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Washington, DC, USA, 24–28 July 2019; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 299–305.
  7. Han, G.H.; Yi, C.H.; Kim, S.H.; Kim, S.B.; Lim, O.B. Test–retest Reliability and Concurrent Validity of a Headphone and Necklace Posture Correction System Developed for Office Workers. Phys. Ther. Korea 2023, 30, 174–183.
  8. Mahmoud, N.F.; Hassan, K.A.; Abdelmajeed, S.F.; Moustafa, I.M.; Silva, A.G. The relationship between forward head posture and neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr. Rev. Musculoskelet. Med. 2019, 12, 562–577.
  9. Fernández-de-Las-Peñas, C.; Cuadrado, M.L.; Pareja, J.A. Myofascial trigger points, neck mobility and forward head posture in unilateral migraine. Cephalalgia 2006, 26, 1061–1070.
  10. Ruivo, R.M.; Pezarat-Correia, P.; Carita, A.I. Effects of a resistance and stretching training program on forward head and protracted shoulder posture in adolescents. J. Manip. Physiol. Ther. 2017, 40, 1–10.
  11. Cole, A.K.; McGrath, M.L.; Harrington, S.E.; Padua, D.A.; Rucinski, T.J.; Prentice, W.E. Scapular bracing and alteration of posture and muscle activity in overhead athletes with poor posture. J. Athl. Train. 2013, 48, 12–24.
  12. Avery, R.M. Massage therapy for cervical degenerative disc disease: Alleviating a pain in the neck? Int. J. Ther. Massage Bodyw. 2012, 5, 41.
  13. Kim, D.; Cho, M.; Park, Y.; Yang, Y. Effect of an exercise program for posture correction on musculoskeletal pain. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2015, 27, 1791–1794.
  14. Abdollahzade, Z.; Shadmehr, A.; Malmir, K.; Ghotbi, N. Effects of 4 week postural corrective exercise on correcting forward head posture. J. Mod. Rehabil. 2017, 11, 85–92.
  15. Frank, D.L.; Khorshid, L.; Kiffer, J.F.; Moravec, C.S.; McKee, M.G. Biofeedback in medicine: Who, when, why and how? Ment. Health Fam. Med. 2010, 7, 85.
  16. Mohamed, A.A.; Jan, Y.K.; Raoof, N.A.; Kattabei, O.; Moustafa, I.; Hosny, H. Effect of biofeedback corrective exercise on reaction time and central somatosensory conduction time in patients with forward head posture and radiculopathy: A randomized controlled study. J. Chiropr. Med. 2022, 21, 39–50.
  17. Peper, E.; Shaffer, F. Biofeedback history: An alternative view. Biofeedback 2018, 46, 80–85.
  18. Afzal, M.R.; Oh, M.K.; Yoon, J. Development of a multimodal biofeedback system for balance training. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference of Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), Busan, Republic of Korea, 7–11 July 2015; pp. 658–663.
  19. Al Osman, H.; Eid, M.; El Saddik, A. U-biofeedback: A multimedia-based reference model for ubiquitous biofeedback systems. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2014, 72, 3143–3168.
  20. Giggins, O.M.; Persson, U.M.; Caulfield, B. Biofeedback in rehabilitation. J. Neuro Eng. Rehabil. 2013, 10, 60.
  21. Tsai, P.S.; Chang, N.C.; Chang, W.Y.; Lee, P.H.; Wang, M.Y. Blood pressure biofeedback exerts intermediate-term effects on blood pressure and pressure reactivity in individuals with mild hypertension:a randomized controlled study. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2007, 13, 547–554.
  22. Patel, C.; Datey, K.K. Relaxation and biofeedback techniques in the management of hypertension. Angiology 1976, 27, 106–113.
  23. Joshi, S.; Chawla, B.; Pawalia, A. Exercises in the management of forward head posture: Much needed posture care for online way of life. Physiother. Q. 2022, 30, 41–51.
  24. Lee, K.J.; Oh, J.S.; Kim, S.G. Effect of Biomechanical Feedback Device Utilizing Tilt and Tension Sensors on Young Adults Balance Control Ability, Proprioception and Craniovertebral Angle (CVA). J. Reatt. Ther. Dev. Divers. 2023, 6, 526–534.
  25. Breen, P.P.; Nisar, A.; ÓLaighin, G. Evaluation of a single accelerometer based biofeedback system for real-time correction of neck posture in computer users. In Proceedings of the 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 3–6 September 2009; pp. 7269–7272.
  26. Lee, J.; Cho, E.; Kim, M.; Yoon, Y.; Choi, S. PreventFHP: Detection and warning system for forward head posture. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS), Houston, TX, USA, 23–26 February 2014; pp. 295–298.
  27. Liao, D.Y. Design of a secure, biofeedback, head-and-neck posture correction system. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE First International Conference on Connected Health: Applications, Systems and Engineering Technologies (CHASE), Washington, DC, USA, 27–29 June 2016; pp. 119–124.
  28. Oh, H.J.; Song, G.B. Effects of neuro feedback training on the cervical movement of adults with forward head posture. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2016, 28, 2894–2897.
  29. Kuo, Y.L.; Wang, P.S.; Ko, P.Y.; Huang, K.Y.; Tsai, Y.J. Immediate effects of real-time postural biofeedback on spinal posture, muscle activity, and perceived pain severity in adults with neck pain. Gait Posture 2019, 67, 187–193.
  30. Andani, M.E.; Salehi, Z. An affordable and easy-to-use tool to diagnose knee arthritis using knee sound. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 2024, 88, 105685.
  31. Alcan, V.; Zinnuroğlu, M. Current developments in surface electromyography. Turk. J. Med. Sci. 2023, 53, 1019–1031.
  32. Thurzo, A.; Strunga, M.; Havlínová, R.; Reháková, K.; Urban, R.; Surovková, J.; Kurilová, V. Smartphone-Based Facial Scanning A Viable Tool Facially Driven Orthodontics? Sensors 2022, 12, 7752.
  33. Ko, M.J.; Koo, M.S.; Jung, E.J.; Jeong, W.J.; Oh, J.S. Effect of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training Using Pressure Biofeedback on Pelvic Floor Muscle Contraction and Trunk Muscle Activity in Sitting in Healthy Women. Healthcare 2022, 10, 570.
  34. Cesari, P.; Cristani, M.; Demrozi, F.; Pascucci, F.; Picotti, P.M.; Pravadelli, G.; Zenti, L. Towards Posture and Gait Evaluation through Wearable-Based Biofeedback Technologies. Electronics 2023, 12, 644.
  35. Hribernik, M.; Umek, A.; Tomažič, S.; Kos, A. Review of real-time biomechanical feedback systems in sport and rehabilitation. Sensors 2022, 22, 3006.
  36. Kibushi, B.; Okada, J. Auditory sEMG biofeedback for reducing muscle co-contraction during pedaling. Physiol. Rep. 2022, 10, e15288.
  37. Toledo-Peral, C.L.; Vega-Martínez, G.; Mercado-Gutiérrez, J.A.; Rodríguez-Reyes, G.; Vera-Hernández, A.; Leija-Salas, L.; Gutiérrez-Martínez, J. Virtual/Augmented reality for rehabilitation applications using electromyography as control/biofeedback: Systematic literature review. Electronics 2022, 11, 2271.
  38. Baer, J.L.; Vasavada, A.; Cohen, R.G. Posture biofeedback increases cognitive load. Psychol. Res. 2022, 86, 1892–1903.
More
Information
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register : , ,
View Times: 148
Revisions: 3 times (View History)
Update Date: 29 Jan 2024
1000/1000