Information concerning the catalytic alkene oligomerization and the types of products it produces can be seen in Scheme 1. The nature of the active reaction centers determines the structural types of the resulting oligomers and the regio- and stereoselectivity of a substrate’s insertion. In the processes presented in Scheme 1, hydride, alkyl, or alkene intermediates act as active reaction centers, which, in the early stages, facilitate alkene hydro-, carbo-, or cyclometalation, respectively. Chain termination occurs through the elimination of the oligomeric product, generating metal hydrides, or through the transfer of the growing chain to an organometallic cocatalyst or alkene. Metal hydrides, therefore, can serve as dominant reaction centers in these catalytic systems.
2. Catalytic Synthesis of Terminal Alkene Dimers and Oligomers
In the literature, significant attention is given to Ti subgroup metal complexes, the use of which, in homogeneous catalytic systems, ensures alkene dimerization, oligomerization, and polymerization with high yields and high chemo- and stereoselectivity
[1][5][40]. The selective transformation of α-olefins (propene (
1a), 1-butene (
1b), 1-hexene (
1c), 1-octene (
1d), and 3-methyl-1-butene (
1e)) into vinylidene dimers (
2a–
e) under the action of a catalytic system consisting of Cp
2ZrCl
2 (
3) or Cp
2ZrMe
2 (
4) and aluminoxane, obtained in situ through the reaction of AlR
3 (R = Me, Et, and Bu
i) with CuSO
4·5H
2O, was reported in one of the first works on this topic (Scheme 2)
[43]. Dimeric products were obtained with a selectivity of up to 96% during the reaction performed at 40–70 °C for 0.5–2 h with the following reagent ratio: [Zr]:[Al]:[1-alkene] = 1:(8–100):(600–4670). The highest alkene conversion rate and selectivity towards the dimerization were achieved in the reaction, which was catalyzed with Cp
2ZrCl
2 and methylaluminoxane (MAO).
Scheme 2. Alkene dimerization under the action of a catalytic system: Cp
2ZrCl
2 (Cp
2ZrMe
2)-AlR
3 (R = Me, Et, and Bu
i)-CuSO
4·5H
2O
[43].
A dimeric product (
2d) was obtained with a yield of 59% in the reaction of 1-octene with AlMe
3 in the presence of Cp
2ZrCl
2 (
3) in 1,2-dichloroethane at 22 °C for 12 h (Scheme 3)
[44]. It was assumed that the initial stage of the reaction was the alkene carbometalation and the formation of metal alkyl
7, which hydrometalates 1-octene through state
8. As a result, 2-methyl-1-octene and the hydrometalation product, n-OctML
n, are accumulated in the mixture. The latter reacts with 1-octene via carbometalation to provide 2-(n-hexyl)-1-decyl metal that hydrometalates 1-octene to form n-OctML
n and dimer
2d (Scheme 3).
Scheme 3. Reaction of 1-octene with AlMe
3 in the presence of Cp
2ZrCl
2 in 1,2-dichloroethane and probable mechanism
[44].
Furthermore, terminal alkenes
1b,
1c, and
1e–
h were dimerized in the presence of the catalytic system Cp
2ZrCl
2-MAO at an Al/Zr ratio of 1:1 and a room temperature of 25 °C for 24 h with the product yield of 80–90% (Scheme 4)
[45][46]. 3-Methyl-1-butene (
1e) provided a mixture of 2-methyl-2-butene (
9e, 77%), 2-methyl-1-butene (
10e, 17%), and 5-methyl-2-(methylethyl)-1-hexene (
2e, 3%). The reaction of
o-diallylbenzene (
1i) with Cp
2ZrCl
2 and MAO at an Al/Zr ratio of 4:1 for 3 days provided a cyclic product, methylenecycloheptane
11i, with a 70% yield.
Scheme 4. Alkene dimerization in the presence of catalytic system (Cp
2ZrCl
2-MAO) and probable reaction mechanism
[45][46].
The mechanism proposed in
[45][46] for the dimerization reaction implies the insertion of 1-alkene into a Zr-H bond of zirconocene hydride
14 to obtain Zr-alkyl complex
15, which then carbometalates the second alkene molecule, producing alkyl derivative
16. Subsequent β-H elimination in alkyl complex
16 provides dimer
2 and hydride complex
14 (Scheme 4). It is noted that the presence of chlorine in a catalytic system is an important factor for the dimerization reaction. In confirmation, a higher oligomer formation was seen in the presence of Cp
2ZrMe
2 (
4) as a catalyst and MAO (without Cl atoms) was given. The chlorine atom probably ensures the fast β-H elimination, but not the growth of an alkyl chain
[46].
A dimeric hydride complex, [(2,4,7-Me
3-Ind)
2Y(μ-H)]
2 (
17) (Scheme 5), appeared to be an effective catalyst for the homodimerization of various α-olefins
[47]. The reaction was performed in benzene at 80–100 °C for 2–24 h, and there was a 20–50-fold molar excess of α-olefins. The head-to-tail dimerization was observed in the case of 1-hexene (
1c) and 3-methyl-1-butene (
1e) with a selectivity of >98%.
Scheme 5. α-Olefin homo- and codimerization, catalyzed with the following hydride complex: [(2,4,7-Me
3-Ind)
2Y(μ-H)]
2 [47].
The reaction runs through sequential 1,2-insertion followed by β-H elimination (Scheme 6)
[47]. The homodimerization of trimethylvinylsilane (
1i) and styrene (
1k) occurred, forming head-to-head products. The reactions presumably proceed through an initial 1,2-insertion into the Y-H bond, followed by a subsequent 2,1-coordination and β-H abstraction. Olefins
1l–
o, containing heteroatoms, 3,3-dimethyl-1-butene (
1j), and allylbenzene (
1h), did not undergo homodimerization under the reaction conditions. In the reaction with
1h, C-H activation arose, resulting in the formation of a catalytically inactive allyl complex, Ind’
2Y(η
3-CH
2CHCHPh). The reaction of
17 with
1l–
o provided stable alkyl complexes that deactivated the catalyst.
Scheme 6. Proposed mechanism of α-olefin homo- and codimerization, catalyzed with [(2,4,7-Me
3-Ind)
2Y(μ-H)]
2 (
17)
[47].
Complex 17 also showed activity in the styrene codimerization with alkenes (H2C=CHR) that produced trans-1-phenyl-4-alkylbut-1-enes (20) with more than an 88% yield at 80–100 °C (Scheme 5). The reaction probably occurred through the 1,2-coordination of α-olefin into the Y-H bond, followed by a subsequent 2,1-insertion of styrene into the Y-C bond of the alkyl intermediate and β-H elimination (Scheme 6). Heteroatom-containing olefins 1l–o readily formed head-to-head codimers with styrene. However, these substrates exhibited lower reactivity, and the accompanying formation of the styrene homodimer was observed.
Complexes of various structures were subsequently tested in the reactions to find selective catalysts for alkene dimerization and oligomerization. For example, 1-pentene (
1f) was transformed into oligomers in the presence of catalytic systems based on
bis-cyclopentadienyl complexes
3,
22, and
23 and MAO in a ratio ([Zr]:[MAO]:[substrate] = 1:1000:30,000) at 60 °C for 24 h in toluene (Scheme 7)
[48]. Oligomeric products with low molecular weights were obtained: dimers (25%), trimers (18%), and tetramers (14%). The use of catalysts with
ansa-indenyl ligands (EBI)ZrCl
2 (
24) and (SBI)ZrCl
2 (
25) led to the formation of isotactic poly(1-pentene) (M
N = 1700–4400 g mol
−1, PDI = 4.75–6.41). Further studies on the catalytic properties of complexes
3 and
22–
28 at a reagent ratio ([metallocene]:[MAO]:[1-alkene] = 1:(1000–8000):30,000) at 20–150 °C demonstrated the dependence of the reaction chemoselectivity upon the metallocene structure
[49]. The reaction of 1-pentene, catalyzed with complexes
22 and
23 and MAO ([Zr]:[MAO] = 1:1000), resulted in an atactic polypentene, whereas
ansa-indenyl complexes
24–
26 provided an isotactic polymer with stereoselectivities of 0.91, 0.45, and 0.64 (mmmm), respectively. The polymer with the highest molecular weight (M
W = 149,000, PDI = 1.85–2.08) was obtained by using catalyst
26. The reaction, which was catalyzed with cyclopentadienyl complexes
3,
27, and
28, under these conditions, afforded the oligomeric products with 2–4 units. In this case, the highest conversion (50%) was achieved in the presence of bimetallic complex
27, whereas the yields of dimers, trimers, and tetramers were 10, 20, and 20%, respectively. An increase in the amount of MAO to 6000 eq. in the case of complex
3 caused an increase to 80% in the alkene conversion, and the yields of dimers, trimers, and tetramers increased to 15, 30, and 35%, respectively (Scheme 7)
[49].
Scheme 7. 1-Pentene oligomerization, catalyzed with complexes
2 and
22–
28 [48][49].
Branched
α-olefins were regioselectively dimerized at 20 °C in toluene for 3–142 h upon the action of Cp
2MCl
2 (M = Ti (
29), Zr (
3), and Hf (
22)) or Me
2SiCp
2ZrCl
2 (
30) and MAO at the following ratio: [M]:[MAO] = 1:581 (Scheme 8)
[50]. Complex
30 with Me
2Si-bonded cyclopentadienyl ligands showed the highest activity and regioselectivity, providing dimers
2q–
t with yields of up to 100%. 3-Methyl-1-butene (
1e) and 3-methyl-1-pentene (
1p) provided dimers with yields of 11 and 19%, as well as oligomeric products
21e and
21p, correspondingly.
Scheme 8. Oligomerization of branched
α-olefins, catalyzed with Cp
2MCl
2 (M = Ti (
29), Zr (
3), and Hf (
22)) or Me
2SiCp
2ZrCl
2 (
30); yields are given for catalyst
30 [50].
As a rule, the application of other transition metal complexes changes the regioselectivity of a reaction. For example, pyridine bis(imine) iron complexes
31a,
b, upon activation with MAO, MMAO, or AlR
3 (R = Et, Bu
i)-B(C
6F
5)
3 (Al/Fe = 70–480), demonstrate the ability to dimerize various α-olefins, such as
1b,
1c,
1u, and
1x (Scheme 9)
[51]. This results in the formation of a mixture of linear olefin dimers
18b,
18c,
18u, and
18x with internal double bonds (63–80%) and monomethyl-branched dimers
35b,
35c,
35u, and
35x (18–36%). Additionally, trisubstituted vinylidene (2-alkylalkenes) or α-olefinic products were detected in trace amounts. High alkene conversion up to 76% was achieved in the presence of
31a–
c and
31e at 30–50 °C. The sterically less hindered complex
31d provided monomethyl-branched dimers
35b,
35c,
35u, and
35x.
Scheme 9. Dependence of the type of alkene dimerization products on the post-metallocene structure
[51].
The reaction mechanism consists of consecutive stages of the 1,2-insertion of the initial olefin into the Fe-H bond, followed by a 2,1-insertion of the second olefin (Scheme 10). Subsequent β-H elimination leads to the formation of linear dimers. Successive 2,1-insertions of alkenes and β-H eliminations produce Me-substituted dimers.
Scheme 10. Mechanism of alkene dimerization, catalyzed with iron complexes
31a–
d [51].
Pyridine bis(imine) cobalt catalysts
32a–
d, when activated with MMAO (Al/Co = 200–500), dimerized α-olefins with lower productivity compared to similar iron systems (TON for 1-butene: 42,000 vs. 147,000 for Co and Fe, respectively) (Scheme 11)
[52]. The main products were linear dimers (>97%) and butene isomers in an
18b/
iso-1b ratio of 0.47–0.7. In the dimerization of propylene, linear hexenes, nonenes, and dodecenes were obtained with turnovers exceeding 200,000 moles of propylene/mole Co (17,000 g oligomer/g Co complex). Complexes
32a and
32b, in combination with MMAO or EtAlCl
2, induced the isomerization of 1-hexene.
Scheme 11. Pyridine bis(imine) cobalt complexes
32a–
d as catalysts of α-olefin dimerization
[52].
The main stages of the stepwise reaction mechanism include a consecutive 1,2-insertion of olefin and a 2,1-insertion into Co-Alkyl, followed by chain termination to provide alkenes with internal and terminal double bonds (Scheme 12)
[52].
Scheme 12. Mechanism of alkene dimerization, catalyzed with Co complexes 32a–d.
Nevertheless, mixed ethylene Co complex
32e catalyzed the transformation of terminal alkenes into vinylidene dimers of a head-to-tail type with yields of 66–80% in the presence of an organoboron activator, HBArF, at a [Co]:[B]:[1-alkene] ratio of 1:0.81:670 in contrast to the post-metallocene catalysts
32a–
d (Scheme 13)
[53]. Moreover, linear terminal alkene
1w formed in the reaction with a yield of up to 14%, presumably due to the isomerization processes in intermediate alkyl Co complexes.
Scheme 13. Transformations of terminal alkenes into dimers, which were catalyzed with complex
32e [53].
α-Olefins
1c, 1d,
1f,
1g, and
1x undergo tail-to-tail dimerization under the action of a catalytic system, WCl
6/R′NH
2/R″
3N/EtAlCl
2, obtained in situ at a [W]:[R′NH
2]:[R″
3N]:[EtAlCl
2]:[1-alkene] molar ratio of 1:(1–4):(0–4):12:(834–5000) to provide predominantly methyl-branched products (
33c,
33d,
33f,
33g, and
33x) (Scheme 14)
[54]. Alkene conversion at a level of 80% and high selectivity towards the dimerization were achieved (>99%) due to the optimal choice of a chlorine-containing organoaluminum activator (EtAlCl
2) and a solvent, PhCl. This effect on the reaction initiation was attributed to the generation of bimetallic catalytically active centers with a W-Cl-Al bridge.
Scheme 14. Alkene dimerization under the action of a catalytic system, WCl
6/R′NH
2/R″
3N/EtAlCl
2 [54].
Upon a detailed analysis of the reaction products using the example of 1-pentene dimers, it was demonstrated that fractions of linear C10 products (constituting only 0.1% of the dimer fraction) contain
trans-5-decene,
cis-4-decene, dienes, and decane (Scheme 15)
[54]. The authors proposed a Cossee-type mechanism
[9], noting that the initial insertion of an alkene occurs equally as 1,2- and 2,1-, followed by a subsequent regioselective alkene 1,2-coordination. Therefore, the dominant structures appear to be
B and
C, which provide the main reaction products.
Scheme 15. Mechanism of alkene dimerization under the action of a catalytic system, WCl
6/R′NH
2/R″
3N/Et
2AlCl
[54].
Low-molecular-weight oligomeric products, including 1-hexene dimers, were synthesized with high yields (73–97%) and selectivity (≥98%) in the presence of Zr and Hf post-metallocene complexes with amino-bis(phenolate) [ONNO] ligands and a neutral activator, B(C
6F
5)
3, at 65–85 °C for 4 h and the following reagent ratio: [metallocene]:[B]:[1-hexene] = 1:1.1:100 (Scheme 16)
[55]. The highest activity in the oligomerization was achieved in the presence of Zr catalysts
34a–
c; in this case, the molecular weights of the products corresponded to a typical Flory–Schulz distribution
[56]. Hafnium catalysts
34d–
f showed lower activities in contrast to the zirconium analogs; however, they showed greater selectivity in dimerization. In addition, the molecular weight distribution of the products obtained in the presence of hafnium catalysts did not follow the Schultz–Flory distribution. The high selectivity in the formation of vinylidene dimers was explained by the prevalence of 1,2-alkene insertions into catalytically active centers, both in primary M-H and secondary M-Alkyl species. It was also noted that the chain termination rate for these systems exceeds the rate of chain propagation. In the case of regioerror, i.e., alkene 2,1-insertions, conversely, the chain propagation prevails because the elimination is practically impossible; therefore, chain termination via β-H elimination will occur when the 1,2-incorporation of an alkene takes place. The authors explain that deviations from the Schultz–Flory distribution are caused by the presence of two or more conformations of hafnium active centers, which have different activities towards alkene (the assumption was made from the
1H NMR spectra of the initial complexes depending on temperature). For zirconium analogs, it seems that either one isomer is characteristic, or the exchange between conformations is very fast (the energy barrier is small), so it does not significantly affect the distribution of oligomers.
Scheme 16. Post-metallocene Zr and Hf amino-bis(phenolate) complexes of [ONNO]-type as catalysts of 1-hexene oligomerization
[55].
A highly regioselective method for the oligomerization of 1-hexene and 1-octene was developed at relatively low catalyst loadings (0.0019–0.0075 mol%) using Zr complexes
35a and
35b with [OSSO]-type aryl-substituted bis(phenolate) ligands and modified methylaluminoxane (dMMAO) (Scheme 17)
[57]. The catalytic system predominantly produced dimers with terminal vinylidene groups (74–91%) and trimers (8–11%) at 25–40 °C for 1 h with the following reagent ratio: [Zr]:[Al]:[1-alkene] = 1:(100–300):(13,350–53,500). The TOF values were adjusted by changing the structure of an aryl substituent R
1 at the
ortho position of a phenolate moiety of the [OSSO] ligand and the number of dMMAO equivalents used. The highest TOF value (up to 11,100 h
−1) was observed for phenyl-substituted precatalyst
35a. The authors explained the low alkene conversion (10–77%) in the presence of
35a and
35b with the deactivation of Zr-H active species during oligomerization.
Scheme 17. Post-metallocene Zr complexes of [OSSO] type as catalysts of alkene oligomerization
[57].
Bis-phenolate titanium complexes
36a–
c, activated by B(C
6F
5)
3 ([Ti]/[B] = 1), catalyzed the transformation of 1-hexene into vinylene oligomers with high yield (up to 97%) and selectivity (99%) (Scheme 18)
[58]. Zirconium (
36d) and hafnium analogs (
36e) showed significantly lower activity (yield of up to 22%), but better selectivity towards vinylidene oligomers (up to 95%). This dependence of regioselectivity on the nature of the transition metal was confirmed in an experiment with
13C-labeled hexene: the cross-linking of an alkene in the case of a Zr catalyst occurs as successive stages of a 1,2-insertion of an olefin into M-H species, a 1,2-insertion of an alkene into M-Alkyl, and β-H elimination. In the case of Ti, the stages of 1,2-olefin insertion into M-H, 2,1-alkene insertion into M-Alkyl, and β-H elimination occur. The rate of 2,1-olefin insertion is affected by solvation, an increase in the bulkiness of the ligand and the growing chain, as well as temperature. Thus, low temperatures down to −80 °C in the case of
36a led to the following ratio: [vinylene]/[vinylidene] = 52/48.
Scheme 18. Post-metallocene bis-phenolate Zr complexes of [OSSO] type as catalysts of alkene oligomerization
[58].
Dimers and oligomers of terminal alkenes were synthesized in catalytic systems based on various zirconocenes (
3 and
37–
52) with cyclopentadienyl ligands; indenyl ligands; fluorenyl ligands, including
ansa-complexes; and heterocenes, which were activated in several steps by AlBu
i3, Et
2AlCl, and methylaluminoxane (Scheme 19)
[5][40][59][60][61][62]. Cyclopentadienyl complexes, including Cp
2ZrCl
2 (
3), (Me
2C)
2Cp
2ZrCl
2 (
37), (Me
2Si)
2Cp
2ZrCl
2 (
38), and OSiMe
2Cp
2ZrCl
2 (
39), at low Al
MAO/Zr ratios (1–10), catalyzed the regio- and chemoselective formation of head-to-tail α-olefin dimers with yields of 82–94% and 100% alkene conversion
[40][61]. The oligomers of α-olefins (1-hexene, 1-octene, and 1-decene) were obtained in the reactions, catalyzed by zirconocenes
40,
41,
42, and
48 and organoaluminum cocatalysts at the following ratio: [Zr]:[AlBu
i3]:[MAO]:[1-alkene] = 1:20:10:2000
[40][59][60][62]. A yield of 1-hexene dimer decreased to 40–52% and a yield of oligomers increased to 55–57% under the same conditions in the presence of the CpIndZr
2Cl
2 complex (
44)
[59][60]. Higher 1-hexene oligomers with Mw = 3900 Da were produced by the Ind
2ZrCl
2 complex (
45)
[59]. The TOF values were (1–2.4)·10
5 h
−1 when
46 and
47 were used in the oligomerization of alkenes
1c,
1d,
1u, and
1x [40].
Scheme 19. Alkene dimerization and oligomerization catalyzed by complexes 3 and 37–52.
To explain the catalytic action of the systems, the mechanisms presented in Scheme 20, Scheme 21 and Scheme 22 were suggested. For example, Zr,Al complex
A stabilized by the ClMAO
– anion
[63] formed in the reaction of Cp
2ZrCl
2 with AlBu
i3 and MAO was proposed as a catalytically active center for the alkene dimerization reaction (Scheme 20)
[59]. An excess of OAC (MAO or AlBu
i3) increases the amount of dihydride complex
B. Catalytically active center
A coordinates an alkene molecule at the Zr–H bond to form alkyl complex
A1, the further alkylation of which provides intermediate
A2. Chlorine atoms in complex
A2 promote the process of β-H transfer to the Zr atom, rather than the coordination of the third and subsequent substrate molecules (chain growth). An alkene dimer and catalytically active center
A are formed after β-H transfer to a Zr atom. Intermediate
B is electrophilic and seems to be sterically accessible for α-olefin oligomerization. An increase in selectivity of the reaction observed in the dimerization after the treatment of a reaction mixture with Et
2AlCl is probably due to the conversion of
B to
A (Scheme 20). The selectivity of the dimerization reaction of α-olefins, therefore, depends mainly on the ratio of catalytically active sites
A and
B.
Scheme 20. α-Olefin dimerization mechanism
[59].
Scheme 21. DFT modeling of the initiation stages of propene dimerization and oligomerization for cationic and binuclear mechanisms
[62].
Scheme 22. DFT modeling of propagation and termination stages of the propene dimerization and oligomerization
[62].
The initial stages of the propene dimerization and oligomerization with the participation of Zr,Al–complexes were simulated at the DFT M-06X/DGDZVP level of theory to confirm the proposed mechanism
[62]. The profiles of propene oligomerization reactions catalyzed by [Cp
2ZrH]
+ cation
I-0 and cationic bimetallic complexes [Cp
2Zr(µ-H)(µ-X)AlR
2]
+ (X = H, Cl, and Me; R = Me and Bu
i)
I-0X were constructed (Scheme 21). Further, activation energies were calculated for the two reaction pathways: the formation of a vinylidene propene dimer via
TS-4 and the chain growth via
TS-5 (Scheme 22).
A difference between the mechanisms for traditional mononuclear [Cp
2Zr-alkyl]
+ and binuclear [Cp
2Zr-alkyl(R
2AlX)]
+ species is shown (Scheme 22). Without R
2AlX coordination, oligomerization is the favored reaction route. When X = H, highly stable β-agostic complexes
I-2X-bo form, so the reactions slow down. If X = Cl, the main direction of the action is the formation of vinylidene dimers. The transition states of β-H elimination
TS-4X (X = H and Cl) show a Zr-Al concerted effect. If X = Me, then there is no significant promotion in the β-H elimination process in
TS-4 [62].
It was found that the use of molecular hydrogen at a low MAO concentration leads to the results being not typical for Ziegler–Natta processes
[62]. The dimerization accelerates, and the selectivity of the reaction in this pathway increases without the formation of hydrogenolysis products in the presence of hydrogen. The DFT simulation showed that the
I-2H-bo complex can react with H
2 without breaking an H-H bond but with a loss of β-agostic coordination. Molecular hydrogen, therefore, acts as an additional activator for the
I-2H-bo hydride complex, which is probably an active and selective catalyst of a dimerization reaction.
Zr heterocene complexes
48 and
49a–
f modified with AlBu
i3 and MMAO-12 were studied in the reaction of 1-decene oligomerization in molecular hydrogen at a [Zr]:[Al]:[MAO]:[1-alkene] ratio of 1:10:75:50,000 at 80–100 °C (Scheme 13)
[64]. The conversion of 1-decene reached 99% in the presence of
49d at 80 °C for 4 h, and the formation of low-viscosity oligomers was observed. As the temperature rises to 100 °C, the content of 1-decene dimer increases to 28%. Nevertheless, heterocene
49f was shown to be the most effective catalyst for the synthesis of low-viscosity 1-decene oligomers among the studied complexes. Moreover, the catalytic system based on complex
49f and an activator, (PhHNMe
2)[B(C
6F
5)
4], enabled us to achieve a maximum yield (63 wt%) of the most valuable trimer–tetramer fractions of alkene oligomers at a [Zr]:[Al]:[B]:[1-alkene] ratio of reagents of 1:150:1.5:200,000 in 1 atm H
2 at 80–110 °C
[64].
Unsymmetrical complexes
50a–
c,
51, and
52 in the presence of AlBu
i3, (PhHNMe
2)[B(C
6F
5)
4], and H
2 (1 bar) at a [Zr]:[Al]:[B]:[1-alkene] ratio of 1:100:1.5:100,000 at 100 °C catalyzed the formation of light 1-decene oligomers with an alkene conversion rate of 86–99%
[65]. A gradual decrease in the reaction temperature as 1-decene was shown to reduce the content of dimers (down to 10%) and increase the proportion of oligomers (up to 84%) in the reaction products.
The authors of
[64] presented a mechanism for the activation of zirconocene complexes by isobutylalanes, arylboranes, and MAO, as depicted in Scheme 23. They noticed that the classical mechanism implies the participation of active catalytic species, such as alkyl zirconocene cations (L
2Zr-R
+ (L
2 = η
5-ligands)) stabilized by [B(C
6F
5)
4]
–, [B(C
6F
5)
3R]
–, or XMAO
– counterions (X = Cl and Me) (Scheme 23A). The reaction between L
2ZrCl
2 and AlBu
i3 produces zirconocene alkyl chloride, L
2Zr(Cl)Bu
i. An excess of AlBu
i3 or HAlBu
i2 provides various neutral hydride Zr,Al complexes
D and
E (Scheme 23B). A cationic hydride bimetallic complex
F is generated in the presence of perfluoroarylboranes (Scheme 23B). Under the action of excess ClAlBu
i2, cation
F transforms into dichloride Zr,Al-complex
G, which can also be formed by the reaction between L
2ZrCl
2 and R
2Al
+. Complex
G was isolated and characterized by NMR and an X-ray diffraction analysis
[64]. Cationic hydride complex
F belongs to the category of dormant states as well as species [L
2Zr-(μ-Me)
2-AlMe
2]
+ (
H). Alkenyl hydride Zr-(μ-H)-Al complex
I formed in the presence of excess AlBu
i3 is considered to be potentially active towards α-olefins (Scheme 23B)
[64]. However, a complex similar to
I was shown to be inactive in alkene polymerization
[66][67]. Moreover, the reaction mechanism involving metallocenes and AlBu
i3 should take into account the participation of a cationic species, “AlBu
i2+”, formed as a result of the reaction of OAC with a boron activator.
Scheme 23. Catalytic species observed in the systems L
2ZrCl
2-AlBu
i3(HAlBu
i2)-activator
[64].
Further, when considering the possible stages of alkene oligomerization (which are coordination, chain growth, and termination, involving the β-H transfer and β-H elimination stages), the authors noted
[65] that in the case of heterocenes, the processes of β-H elimination apparently prevail at the final stage of the reaction, when most of the monomer is consumed, leading to the accumulation of C20 dimers in the products (Scheme 24). The β-H elimination can be facilitated by the coordination of R’
2AlCl at the Zr center. The competing processes of chain propagation and termination are influenced by both steric and electronic factors of the η
5-ligand. It is noted that electron-donating alkyl substituents in the ligand of the complex lead to a decrease in the electrophilicity of the Zr atom and, consequently, to a decrease in catalytic activity, for example, in the case of
49f vs.
50a and
50b. Nevertheless, the lower electrophilicity of Zr (
49f) or steric hindrances (for example, in the case of
51 or
52) of the ligand does not promote β-H transfer, which provides higher yields of C30+ or C50+ oligomers
[65].
Scheme 24. Various reaction directions in the course of alkene oligomerization
[65].
The alkene oligomers were obtained in the reaction catalyzed by
ansa-Ph
2Si(Cp)(9-Flu)ZrCl
2 (
53) in the presence of MAO at an Al/Zr of 200 and a temperature of 60 °C (Scheme 25)
[68]. This system showed the activity to be 131–155 kg mol
Zr−1 h
−1 (PDI = 2.06–2.25). The oligomers constituted a mixture of regioisomeric products with a terminal vinylidene (
21) and internal double bonds (
54) according to the
1H and
13C NMR spectra. Oligomers with vinylene R′CH=CHR″ and vinylidene CH
2=CHR′R″ groups were the major products. Oligomers containing internal disubstituted vinylene groups were formed through 2,1-insertion and β-H elimination or 2,1-insertion and rearrangement, followed by β-H elimination. An NMR analysis of the intensities of the double bond signals and saturated end groups showed the preferential chain transfer to the cocatalyst.
Scheme 25. Alkene oligomers obtained in the reaction catalyzed by
ansa-Ph
2Si(Cp)(9-Flu)ZrCl
2 (
53)
[68].
Zirconocenes (
3,
25,
56–
59) and methylaluminoxane catalyzed terminal alkene transformation into dimers
2c,
2d, and
2u with yields of up to 89% at a [Zr]:[MAO]:[1-alkene] reactant ratio of 1:(50–300):(289–2600) and a temperature of 70–100 °C for 3–4 h (Scheme 26)
[69]. Catalysts
25 and
59 exhibited the highest activity in the oligomerization reaction. Complex
59 demonstrated superior selectivity towards dimer formation. Dimers
2c,
2d, and
2u were converted into tetramers (
55c,
55d, and
55u) under the action of a TiCl
4-Et
2AlCl system.
Scheme 26. Alkene transformations into dimers and tetramers
[69].
The authors proposed a mechanism for metallocene-catalyzed dimerization based on a structural analysis of alkene dimers (Scheme 27)
[69]. The formation of unsaturated (structures
A–
C) and saturated products (structure
D) occurred due to the β-H elimination at cationic metal alkyl centers and chain transfer to a non-transition metal atom (Al), respectively
[69]. The vinylidene group (-C=CH
2) (structure
C) was generated via a 1,2-coordination of an alkene with a [Cp
2ZrH]
+ cation and the subsequent β-H elimination of the product. Alkene 1,2-coordination, cation rearrangement, and β-H elimination produce structures
A and
B with trisubstituted vinyl groups (-C=C(CH
3)-).
Scheme 27. Mechanism of metallocene-catalyzed dimerization
[69].
1-Decene was transformed into oligomers under the action of post-metallocene complexes [M{2,2′-(OC
6H
2-4,6-
tBu
2)
2NHC
2H
4NH}(O
iPr)
2] (
60a–
c) (M = Ti (
a), Zr (
b), and Hf (
c)) and the (Ph
3C)[B(C
6F
5)
4] activator at a [B]:[M] ratio of 1:(0.25–1.5) at 80–120 °C
[70] (Scheme 28). The activity of the catalytic system was quantified as 362–484 g
oligomer mmol
cat−1 h
−1. The resulting oligomers were characterized by the tacticity values (mm + rr) of 88.5% (Ti), 87.3% (Zr), and 86.8% (Hf); the molecular weight (M
N = 445–608 g mol
−1); and the PDI value (1.13–1.30). The resulting oligomers differed in structure and contained vinylidene fragments (CH
2=CRR′ (
21u, δ
H 4.7–4.8 ppm)), vinyl fragments (CH
2=CHR (
54u, δ
H 4.9 and 5.6 ppm)), trisubstituted vinylene groups (RCH=CR′R″ (
54u, δ
H 5.2 ppm)), and disubstituted vinylene groups (RCH=CHR′ (
54u; δ
H 5.3–5.5 ppm)).
Scheme 28. 1-Decene oligomerization, catalyzed by complexes
60a–
c, and kinetic parameters of the reaction
[70].
The monomer consumption, the number of active sites, and the number of unsaturated end groups during the oligomerization reaction were evaluated for each catalytic system in the course of the study of the kinetics of 1-decene oligomerization reaction catalyzed by
60a–
c (Scheme 28)
[70]. An initiation rate constant (k
i) in the presence of complex
60b appeared to be higher than those of
60a and
60c (Scheme 28). The k
i value was inversely related to the molecular weight of an oligomeric product. A catalyst with a high k
i, when the number of active centers is high, leads to low-molecular-weight oligomers. The Ti-based catalytic system exhibited a higher chain propagation rate compared to those of the Zr- and Hf-based systems. Moreover, the reaction initiation stage was found to be slower in comparison to the chain propagation. A decrease in the chain growth constants k
p in the Ti > Hf > Zr series was probably due to the electronic nature of metal centers. The rate of formation of a vinylidene product did not depend on the concentration of 1-decene, whereas the rate of formation of a product with an internal double bond was of the first order relative to the monomer concentration. The k
vinylidene and k
vinylene values were calculated from the initiation rate constants, k
i, where k
vinylene > k
vinylidene by a factor of 2–10. The degree of catalyst involvement in the reaction was 40–60%. The misinsertion stage was slower than the propagation stage for all studied catalysts. The chain termination process runs via the chain β-H transfer to a monomer and the β-H elimination reaction (Scheme 28)
[70].
A study of the activity and chemoselectivity of η
5-metal complexes
3,
22–
24,
29,
30,
37,
45,
58, and
61–
64 in the presence of various OACs (HAlBu
i2, ClAlMe
2, ClAlEt
2, ClAlBu
i2, AlMe
3, AlEt
3, and AlBu
i3) and activators (MMAO-12, (Ph
3C)[B(C
6F
5)
4], and B(C
6F
5)
3) in alkene dimerization and oligomerization showed that either HAlBu
i2 or AlBu
i3 at certain ratios ensure the selectivity of the reaction towards dimerization in comparison with AlMe
3 or AlEt
3 (Scheme 29)
[71]. Moreover, Cp
2ZrCl
2-(AlBu
i3 or HAlBu
i2) or [Cp
2ZrH
2]
2-ClAlR
2 (R = Me, Et, Bu
i) systems produced predominantly head-to-tail dimers (
2c,
d,
h,
k,u,
z) in the presence of MMAO-12 or B(C
6F
5)
3 activators at the [Zr]:[Al]:[MMAO-12]:[1-alkene] ratio of 1:3:30:(50–1000) or the [Zr]:[Al]:[B]:[alkene] ratio of 4:16:1:1000, correspondingly, at 20–60 °C for 5–180 min in toluene with a yield of up to 98% (
2c, 98%;
2d, 91%;
2u, 87%;
2z, 95%;
2h, 61%;
2k, 58%) (Scheme 29)
[71][72].
Scheme 29. Alkene transformations upon the action of metallocene–OAC–activator catalytic systems
[71][72][73][74].
The use of chlorinated solvents (CH
2Cl
2 and CHCl
3) in the Cp
2ZrY
2-YAlBu
i2 (Y = H, Cl) systems’ activator (MMAO-12, (Ph
3C)[B(C
6F
5)
4]) accelerated the reaction and increased the yield of dimeric products
[73]. Under these conditions, the dimers obtained in the first minutes were substrates for the subsequent dimerization and formation of tetramer
55 with yields of up to 79%. Adding an ionic-type cocatalyst, (Ph
3C)[B(C
6F
5)
4], to either the Cp
2ZrCl
2-HAlBu
i2 or [Cp
2ZrH
2]
2-ClAlBu
i2 catalytic systems typically resulted in the formation of oligomeric products
[72]. Replacing the transition metal atom from Zr to Ti or Hf under the same conditions led to a decrease in activity and selectivity towards dimers
[73].
A study on the influence of the ligand structure on the activity and chemoselectivity of the system L
2ZrCl
2-HAlBu
i2-MMAO-12 revealed that dimerization occurs with the participation of Zr complexes with sterically unhindered ligands (L = Cp,
ansa-Me
2CCp
2,
ansa-(Me
2C)
2Cp
2, and
ansa-Me
2SiCp
2)
[74]. Zirconocenes with bulky cyclopentadienyl (L = C
5Me
5 and
rac-H
4C
2[THInd]
2) or electron-withdrawing indenyl (L = Ind, Me
2CInd
2, H
4C
2[Ind]
2 and BIPh(Ind)
2) substituents in the presence of HAlBu
i2 and MMAO-12 or (Ph
3C)[B(C
6F
5)
4] activators predominantly yielded 1-hexene oligomers, which is consistent with the data in Ref.
[60]. The assessment of the stereoselectivity of the reaction using
13C NMR spectroscopy showed a dependence of this parameter on the
π-ligand environment of the metal and the type of activator
[74]. Catalysts with indenyl ligands
45,
62, and
24 were found to be the most stereoselective, demonstrating isotacticity levels of 67%, 93%, and 71%, respectively. An oligomer with an isotacticity level of 67% was obtained under the action of complex
45 in the presence of MMAO-12, whereas (Ph
3C)[B(C
6F
5)
4] led to an atactic product. The opposite situation was observed for complex
62 with
ansa-bridged ligands: the highest stereoselectivity was achieved in the presence of (Ph
3C)[B(C
6F
5)
4].
These facts indicate that a cocatalyst has a significant influence on the stereoregulation process during the alkene coordination through catalytically active centers. As a result, the data on the structure and reactivity of possible intermediates
[71][72][74][75], the high selectivity of a reaction towards the dimerization, and completely different rates of oligomerization and dimerization processes allow us to propose a mechanism (Scheme 30). The mechanism implies the involvement of bis-zirconium hydride structures as precursors of dimerization reaction active sites. At the first stage of the reaction, the hydrometalation of alkenes proceeds with the participation of one of the zirconium centers. The introduction of the second alkene molecule, the carbometalation stage, and the β-H elimination stage can also proceed in concert with the involvement of two zirconium atoms. Finally, the dimerization product (
2) and the starting bis-zirconium complex are formed. Examples of such bimetallic catalysis are known for the polymerization of alkenes in the presence of subgroup 4 metal complexes
[76], as well as ethylene tetramerization reactions on chromium catalysts
[77][78][79].
Scheme 30. Probable mechanism of alkene dimerization
[72].
Thus, the literature provides extensive information on the dimerization and oligomerization of alkenes under the action of homogeneous catalytic systems based on metallocenes and post-metallocenes. Typically, these works emphasize the key roles of metal hydride intermediates as active species. Therefore, the study of the structure and reactivity of hydride complexes of transition metals is a relevant task to develop models of reaction mechanisms.