Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Marien Alet Graham
 -- 1279 2024-01-22 16:10:09 |
2 layout
Camila Xu
 Meta information modification 1279 2024-01-23 02:18:49 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Saal, P.E.; Graham, M.A. Educational Technology in Mathematics Education. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/54207 (accessed on 19 May 2024).
Saal PE, Graham MA. Educational Technology in Mathematics Education. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/54207. Accessed May 19, 2024.
Saal, Petronella Elize, Marien Alet Graham. "Educational Technology in Mathematics Education" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/54207 (accessed May 19, 2024).
Saal, P.E., & Graham, M.A. (2024, January 22). Educational Technology in Mathematics Education. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/54207
Saal, Petronella Elize and Marien Alet Graham. "Educational Technology in Mathematics Education." Encyclopedia. Web. 22 January, 2024.
Educational Technology in Mathematics Education
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/su15064798

The use of technology rapidly increased in society over the past decade or so. Consequently, many educational systems incorporated the use of educational technology in their curricula. Elementary and secondary education teachers were urged to integrate technology into education.

educational technology HLM interview mathematics education mixed-method

1. Introduction

Nearly all of the 57 countries that participated in the Trends in Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2019 highlighted the importance of using educational technology to enhance the effectiveness of teaching and learning [1]. In fact, several countries, including South Africa and Germany, made substantial investments in rolling out educational technology in schools. For instance, the South African government allocated approximately 15.3 billion rands towards instructional equipment that included educational technology [2]. In a similar vein, the German government allocated about 2.4 billion euros for the proposed Digital Pact program, aiming to equip schools in Germany with digital infrastructure [3]. Sadly, these investments do not automatically result in improved learner performance. Instead, educational technology only provides teachers with new teaching strategies, which might positively influence learner performances if integrated correctly [4]. Several studies documented the advantages of using educational technology in mathematics education. For instance, the British Educational Communication and Technology Agency (BECTA) stated that educational technology could develop learners’ visual imagery and assist them in observing patterns and exploring data that can be beneficial for learning mathematics [5]. Nevertheless, regardless of the ways in which educational technology can benefit teaching and learning, many mathematics teachers still do not recognise its advantages [6]. The distribution of educational technology to schools does not automatically translate into a situation where teachers actually use it for instruction purposes or to improve the quality of education [7]. To this point, very few studies are interested in the use of educational technology in South African and German schools. Consequently, this study investigated the use of educational technology in two schools per country. These schools were purposefully sampled as they had educational technology available for mathematics education. This mixed-method study explored the different ways in which mathematics teachers use educational technology in German and South African primary school classrooms. Educational technology is not restricted to technology but is anything that enhances classroom learning in the utilisation of blended, face-to-face, or online learning.

2. Different Ways in Which Teachers Use Educational Technology

The adoption of educational technology by mathematics teachers largely depends on whether or not they use it voluntarily [8]. Many mathematics teachers are, however, pressured by curriculum requirements to integrate technology into their classroom instruction. Others are willing to change their teaching approach due to the known benefits of using educational technology in mathematics education. One of the most basic conditions is that the devices must be readily available in the classroom for teachers to use computers in mathematics lessons.
In Turkey, Birgin et al. [9] used a descriptive survey to investigate mathematics teachers’ perceptions while using Information Communication Technologies (ICTs). Their study included 242 mathematics teachers from Grade 5 to Grade 12. They found that almost all teachers owned a computer and smartphone and had access to the internet. Almost 70% (69.8%) of these teachers received training on Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI), and therefore, one would assume that most would use computers in their instruction. However, Birgin et al. [9] found that only 14.0% of these teachers used computers very often, while 28.9% used computers often, 19.4% barely used them, and 7.4% never used computers in mathematics instruction. Their findings also showed that just over one-quarter (25.6%) of these teachers frequently used the smartboard, while 7.0% rarely used it during mathematics lessons. An interesting finding is that these teachers had ICT available and had some knowledge about which software was available (for example, Mathematica, Cabri II, Cabri 3D, Maple, and Geometer’s Sketchpad), which means the training they received on CAI did not necessarily result in their use of educational technology in mathematics. Another interesting finding was that teachers mostly used ICT as a communication tool rather than an instructional tool [9].
In South Africa, Umugiraneza et al. [10] investigated the extent to which mathematics teachers from schools in the KwaZulu-Natal province used technology in the classroom. These authors distributed a questionnaire to a sample of 75 mathematics teachers. Only 44.0% of these teachers indicated that their schools have computer facilities, and 28.0% explained that some computers could be used for mathematics instruction. Their findings also suggest that these teachers are more comfortable using calculators than computers. An area of concern is that computers are not used for instructional purposes, but more for administration in schools with computer facilities [10].
Xiang [6] used a mixed-method approach to compare how mathematics teachers from England and China integrate technology into mathematics. In total, 348 mathematics teachers completed a questionnaire (229 from China and 119 from England). Additionally, 11 teachers were interviewed and observed (six from China and five from England). Findings showed that mathematics teachers from China mostly used computers, data projectors, Microsoft Office programmes (such as Word, Excel, and PowerPoint), followed by calculators, interactive whiteboards, and Geometer’s Sketchpad, and most reported that they barely use mobile phones in mathematics teaching.
On the other hand, teachers from England reported mostly using calculators, computers, interactive whiteboards, GeoGebra, and Autograph, while they barely use smartphones and projectors in mathematics education. Chinese teachers mainly used Baidu (search engine) to browse websites focusing on specific subjects, download pictures and videos, and look for interactive programs focusing on specific content, while teachers from England mostly used Google for these purposes. Interestingly, Chinese teachers mostly used local communication platforms like WeChat to exchange teaching material. Findings from Xiang [6] also showed that Chinese teachers mostly use the technology mentioned above to explain mathematical knowledge, while the teachers from England use technology to demonstrate exercises and problem-solving steps. Teachers from both countries mostly used computers as presentation tools, particularly for explaining and justifying concepts (Chinese teachers) as well as for calculations and checking purposes (teachers from England).

3. Teacher Perceptions about the Integration of Educational Technology

Pajares [11] describes beliefs as personal guides that aid individuals in defining and understanding the world and themselves. Tezci [12] explains that teachers’ perceptions of Computer-assisted Learning (CAL) can be cognitive, affective, and behavioural. For instance, a teacher’s perception of educational technology as useful is referred to as a cognitive perception. Secondly, an example of an affective perception is when teachers like or dislike educational technology. Thirdly, teachers who had a positive experience with educational technology and recommended other teachers to integrate it into teaching are using a behavioural perception. However, educational technology researchers group beliefs mostly as teacher- and learner-centred [13]. The literature revealed that teacher perceptions and attitudes are important elements in determining whether teachers will use educational technology in their classroom and how they plan to implement it [13].
Various studies have been conducted to determine teachers’ perceptions based on integrating educational technology [14][15][16]. Research has shown that it is mostly teachers with learner-centred (constructivist teaching styles) who are most likely to use educational technology in their teaching practices [17][18][19]. Farjon et al. [20] found that the attitudes and beliefs of pre-service teachers had the strongest influence on their actual use of educational technology, while access to educational technology was the weakest predictor. In fact, an earlier study by Moila [21] found that mathematics teachers from a rural school in South Africa believed that the use of ICTs improves learner performances, motivates and encourages learners, and provides different teaching approaches which ensure that learners enjoy mathematics. Most recently, Bardakcı and Alkan [22] found that performance expectancy positively and significantly influenced Turkish pre-service teachers’ behavioural intention to use the interactive whiteboard for teaching purposes. This finding is supported by Stols et al. [23], who found similar results using South African data. Researchers who used the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) also found that “perceive usefulness” influences teachers’ attitudes towards using educational technology, which in turn influences their intention to use it in teaching and learning [24][25].

References

  1. Mullis, I.V.S.; Martin, M.O.; Foy, P.; Kelly, D.L.; Fishbein, B. TIMSS 2019 International Results in Mathematics and Science; International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. 2020. Available online: https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/international-results/ (accessed on 24 September 2021).
  2. Gigaba, M. Budget Speech. 2018. Available online: www.treasury.gov.za (accessed on 16 June 2019).
  3. Scholz, O. Draft 2019 Budget and Financial Plan to 2022: Forward-Looking, Fair and Responsible. 2018. Available online: https://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Content/EN/Pressemitteilungen/2018/2018-07-27-2019-budget.html (accessed on 11 May 2019).
  4. Levin, T.; Wadmany, R. Changes in educational beliefs and classroom practices of teachers and students in rich technology-based classrooms. Technol. Pedagog. Educ. 2008, 14, 281–307.
  5. Jones, A. A Review of the Research Literature on Barriers to the Uptake of ICT by Teachers; British Educational Communications and Technology Agency: Coventry, UK, 2004; Available online: https://dera.ioe.ac.uk//id/eprint/1603 (accessed on 1 April 2022).
  6. Xiang, K. An Investigation and Comparison on Chinese and English Teachers’ Use of Technology in Teaching Mathematics. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK, 2018. Available online: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/An-investigation-and-comparison-on-Chinese-and-use-Xiang/7294c5f298089b0bb81976c58830b011957adea2 (accessed on 1 November 2022).
  7. McCulloch, A.W.; Hollebrands, K.; Lee, H.; Harrison, T.; Mutlu, A. Factors that influence secondary mathematics teachers’ integration of technology in mathematics lessons. Comput. Educ. 2018, 123, 26–40.
  8. Venkatesh, V.; Morris, M.G.; Davis, G.B.; Davis, F.D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003, 27, 425–478.
  9. Birgin, O.; Uzun, K.; Akar, S.G.M. Investigation of Turkish mathematics teachers’ proficiency perceptions in using information and communication technologies in teaching. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2019, 25, 487–507.
  10. Umugiraneza, O.; Bansilal, S.; North, D. Exploring teachers’ use of technology in teaching and learning mathematics in KwaZulu-Natal schools. Pythagoras 2018, 39, 342.
  11. Pajares, M.F. Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Rev. Educ. Res. 1992, 62, 307–332.
  12. Tezci, E. Factors that influence pre-service teachers’ ICT usage in education. Eur. J. Teach. Educ. 2011, 34, 483–499.
  13. Admiraal, W.; Louws, M.; Lockhorst, D.; Paas, T.; Buynsters, M.; Cviko, A.; van der Ven, F. Teachers in school-based technology innovations: A typology of their beliefs on teaching and technology. Comput. Educ. 2017, 114, 57–68.
  14. Bas, G.; Kubiatko, M.; Murat, A. Teachers’ perceptions towards ICTs in teaching-learning process: Scale validity and reliability study. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 61, 176–185.
  15. Khlaif, Z. Teachers’ perceptions of factors affecting their adoption and acceptance of mobile technology in K-12 settings. Comput. Sch. 2018, 35, 49–67.
  16. Pierce, R.; Ball, L. Perceptions that may affect teachers’ intention to use technology in secondary mathematics classes. Educ. Stud. Math. 2009, 71, 299–317.
  17. Hermans, R.; Tondeur, J.; van Braak, J.; Valcke, M. The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Comput. Educ. 2008, 51, 1499–1509.
  18. Kim, C.; Kim, M.K.; Lee, C.; Spector, J.M.; DeMeester, K. Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teach. Teach. Educ. 2013, 29, 76–85.
  19. Tondeur, J.; Van Braak, J.; Ertmer, P.A.; Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 2017, 65, 555–575.
  20. Farjon, D.; Smits, A.; Voogt, J.; Knezek, G.; Christensen, R.; Petko, D.; van Braak, J. Factors affecting pre- and in-service use of technology in teaching: Implications for research and practice—Part 1. In Proceedings of the EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 25 June 2018; pp. 604–607.
  21. Moila, M.M. The Use of Educational Technology in Mathematics Teaching and Learning: An Investigation of a South African Rural Secondary School. Masters’ Thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa, 2006. Available online: https://repository.up.ac.za/bitstream/handle/2263/23899/dissertation.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed on 14 November 2022).
  22. Bardakcı, S.; Alkan, M.F. Investigation of Turkish preservice teachers’ intentions to use IWB in terms of technological and pedagogical aspects. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2019, 24, 2887–2907.
  23. Stols, G.; Ferreira, a.; Pelser, A.; Olivier, W.; Van der Merwe, A.; De Villiers, C.; Venter, S. Perceptions and needs of South African Mathematics teachers concerning their use of technology for instruction. S. Afr. J. Educ. 2015, 35, 1–13. Available online: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/saje/article/view/127070 (accessed on 17 January 2023).
  24. Akar, S.G.M. Does it matter being innovative: Teachers’ technology acceptance. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2019, 24, 3415–3432.
  25. van Deursen, A.J.; Ben Allouch, S.; Ruijter, L.P. Tablet use in primary education: Adoption hurdles and attitude determinants. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2016, 21, 971–990.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Education & Educational Research
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Petronella Elize Saal
,
Marien Alet Graham
View Times: 122
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 30 Jan 2024
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Feedback