Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 -- 1701 2024-01-16 10:54:19 |
2 layout & references + 8 word(s) 1709 2024-01-17 02:14:25 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Kholiavchuk, D.; Gurgiser, W.; Mayr, S. Past Developments of Carpathian Forests. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/53890 (accessed on 01 July 2024).
Kholiavchuk D, Gurgiser W, Mayr S. Past Developments of Carpathian Forests. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/53890. Accessed July 01, 2024.
Kholiavchuk, Dariia, Wolfgang Gurgiser, Stefan Mayr. "Past Developments of Carpathian Forests" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/53890 (accessed July 01, 2024).
Kholiavchuk, D., Gurgiser, W., & Mayr, S. (2024, January 16). Past Developments of Carpathian Forests. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/53890
Kholiavchuk, Dariia, et al. "Past Developments of Carpathian Forests." Encyclopedia. Web. 16 January, 2024.
Past Developments of Carpathian Forests
Edit

The Carpathians are the second largest mountain range in Europe and provide multiple ecosystem services of enormous regional importance. The Carpathians belong to seven Central and Eastern European countries (Czech Republic, Slovakia, Poland, Hungary, Ukraine, Romania, and Serbia), whose share of forest land is among the lowest in Europe (27%). With a total area of 9.92 million hectares, Carpathian forests constitute over 70% of the total forested land in Slovakia and Romania, with Romania alone harboring more than 45% of all Carpathian forests. Most of the Carpathian forests are dominated by European beech (Fagus sylvatica), Norway spruce (Picea abies), oak (Quercus robur, Quercus petraea), and silver fir (Abies alba) stands, covering over 70% of the altitudinal range (with the highest point being Gerlachovský štít, 2655 m a.s.l., in the Slovakian Tatra Mountains). The Carpathian Mountains were characterized in terms of their forests in the period starting from Holocene deglaciation. Climate fluctuations and human activities have led to substantial changes in forest systems, and anthropogenic activities, such as logging, fire activities, and grazing, have shaped the distribution and structure of present-day Carpathian forests. The rapid climate change in recent decades adds uncertainty to the future development of these forest systems.

mountain forests climate change effects sustainable forest management mixed forests tree species

1. From the Holocene to the Anthropocene

In the Holocene, deglaciation was followed by substantial forest expansion in the Carpathians. Increasing temperatures (up to +10 °C at higher elevations) led to an upward shift of the treeline, with the glacial refugees Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and larch (Larix decidua) reaching more than 2000 m (present limit: 1200 to 1900 m [1][2]) in the Early Holocene (11,500–8000 years ago [3][4][5][6]). In the foothills, the warming enabled the spread of mixed oak stands [7]. In the Preboreal and the especially warm and humid Atlantic climatic phase, early coniferous and broadleaf successors were continuously replaced by Norway spruce (exceeding 60% in proportion), silver fir, European beech, and hornbeam (Carpinus betulus) [3][8][9] (Figure 1). Due to their higher shade tolerance, especially silver fir and beech were competitive compared with early conifer successors [10]. The competition in dense mixed stands also favoured beech over Norway spruce, resulting in beech-dominated forests up to 1000 m. This transition started earlier (around 5200 years ago) in the Western and Eastern Carpathians and later (around 4000 years ago) in the Southern Carpathians [4][11][12].
Figure 1. Holocene evolution of tree species which are dominant in present-day Carpathian forests: (a) submontane and lower montane zones; (b) upper montane zones. The pollen fraction is the averaged fraction of tree pollen (%) calculated from pollen analyses of 30 studies in total [4][5][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. The pollen fraction of forest tree species for the Subatlantic period is based on the time before the 16th century. For some periods, no data (n.d.) are available. The location of the case studies is given in the Supplementary Material (can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/f15010065/s1.)
In the Late Bronze and Early Iron Ages, human activity became the main factor for the further development of Carpathian forests. The use of timber led to the lowering of the treeline (amplified by declining summer temperatures [2]), and at lower elevations, oak was intensively logged due to settlement and agricultural expansion, though forest openings contributed to its regeneration [4]. European beech and silver fir populations expanded, whereas silver fir especially benefited from fire activities due to the colonialization of burned areas [14][19]. Anthropogenic influence (e.g., fire, logging, grazing) continued to be the dominating factor of development in the Late Iron Age and the Roman Age. In the late Middle Ages, mining and the Walachian colonization led to a dramatic transformation of Carpathian forests by humans: it resulted in a massive decrease in forest areas in the 14th–15th centuries in the Western Carpathians [15][37][38] and the Eastern Carpathians [14][30][39][40] and in the 16th and 17th centuries in the Southern Carpathians [41]. Intensive use of wood for construction led to a decrease in the proportion of both deciduous (European beech, required, e.g., for potash production [42][43]) and coniferous (silver fir and Norway spruce) trees [14], while oak forests expanded [30]. However, silver fir stands also regenerated in many Carpathian forests, probably due to favourable conditions for this species’ growth after grazing activities, the predominant logging of European beech in the times of intense colonization, and litter raking [27][44][45][46].
Intense forest exploitation continued into the times of the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy (from the late 18th to the beginning of the 20th century) when the biggest decrease in Carpathian forest cover was reported [47][48][49][50][51]. The Western Carpathians were at the forefront of changes caused by cropland expansion into the mountain areas of native ranges for European beech and Norway spruce (Figure 2). For the sake of increasing timber yields, Norway spruce was favoured, as it allowed for shorter rotation periods and provided wood of good quality and manifold usability. This resulted in monodominant forests in many regions. Consequently, these forests were very vulnerable to severe disturbances (windstorms, bark beetle outbreaks), aggravated by extreme cold periods in the Late Little Ice Period [31][52], with the most pronounced effects in the 19th century [53] and peaks in the periods from 1830 to 1850 and from 1860 to 1880 in the Western and Eastern Carpathians [54][55][56][57] and from 1880 to 1910 in the Southern Carpathians [58]. As a result, the lowest point in forest cover occurred in the 1920s [59].
Figure 2. Cropland (a) and pasture (b) dynamics (created using the data from [60]) and native ranges of dominant forest tree species (data from [61]) in the Carpathians between 1700 and 2007.
In the 20th century, climatic conditions stabilized, and the Carpathian forest area increased between the two World Wars [62][63]. The latter went together with chaotic reforestation following land abandonment because of diverse land use decisions due to ownership changes, and asynchronous political and socio-cultural developments throughout the Carpathian countries [64][65][66].

2. Recent Developments

The political situation after World War II led to major socio-economic changes in Central and Eastern Europe, also resulting in land use changes in the Carpathians. The land use regimes shifted from agriculturally dominated to forest-dominated structures, and accordingly, agricultural land abandonment has become the common driver of the recent forest cover increase in the Carpathians (e.g., an increase of 6% in the Polish Carpathians from 1990 to 2012 [67]). This process took place especially in depopulated regions [68][69], in areas less suitable for agriculture, and at higher and steeper elevations [70][71]. At the same time, the artificial increase in Norway spruce forests (by 46% in the Southern Carpathians [72]), a profound decrease in silver fir stands (by up to 39% in the Ukrainian Carpathians [73]), and the tendency towards European beech dominance were characteristic of the postwar period. After 1990, the social and economic conditions in the transition period toward market economies, such as decreasing profitability of agriculture and improved possibilities for employment in industrial centres or tourism and recreation services, fostered further land abandonment [74][75][76][77]. Accordingly, in Poland, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic, where post-socialist land reforms and support from the European Union were adopted early, the rate of agricultural land abandonment (cropland and pasture reduction) and the respective increase in forest area within the Carpathian Mountains were the most pronounced [50][75][78][79]. In contrast, the forest area in the Romanian Carpathians, even in the first decade of the 21st century, was still shaped by grazing (Figure 2).
Land abandonment is also the main driver of the recent altitudinal forest expansion [80][81][82], supported by a prolonged vegetation period due to global warming [83], as well as protection measures (see, e.g., [80][84]). The altitudinal forest expansion was the most pronounced in recent decades, with an average upward shift of 0.5–1 m per year [85][86].
In contrast to the quantitative increase (in terms of forest area or timber production) in Carpathian forests, their qualitative development (in terms of forest vitality or structure) was hindered by unfavourable forest practices, like large-area deforestation (e.g., a 6% decrease in afforested area in the period from 1990 to 2012 in the Romanian Carpathians [87]), fragmentation, decrease in core forests (i.e., increase in the patch and perforated forest), and homogenization in species and age structures [49][88][89]. Rapid modification of regulations in the post-socialist period resulted in liberalized deforestation regulations across the region. As early as the transition years (1988–1994), harvesting almost doubled in Ukraine, Poland, and Slovakia [90]. The ownership recovery process and massive forest restitution to private owners contributed to both legal and illegal logging, mostly in the Eastern and Southern Carpathians [91][92][93][94]). In the Romanian Carpathians, deforestation intensified after the restitution laws of 1991, 2000, and 2005, resulting in a loss of 4.5% in the total forest area and disturbances (windthrows, droughts, bark beetle outbreaks) occurring more often [88][95][96][97]. Significant forest disturbances after 2000, with almost 20% of forests being affected, were also found in the Polish, Slovakian, and Czech Carpathians [98]. For instance, this also caused a cascade of disturbances in High Tatra Mountain Norway spruce forests as a consequence: a severe drought in 2003, followed by bark beetle infestation; the Elisabeth windstorm in 2004, followed by deforestation, fragmentation, and bark beetle outbreak; Kyrill and Phillip windstorms (2007), followed by deforestation; bark beetle infestation peak (2009) and clear-cut logging (2009–2012). These events led to a 54% decrease in the national park forest area from 2002 to 2018 [99][100], with the biggest damage being caused to the treeline [101]. Forest disturbances were observed in all ownership types, although disturbance rates in private forests were about five times higher than on public lands, and these forests were more fragmented than state and national park forests [102]. Additionally, wind and snowstorm disturbances were particularly destructive in forests, whose composition was artificially changed towards monocultures through clear-cutting [94].
Air pollution (peaking in the 1980s and 1990s), causing acid rain and photochemical pollution (reaction of nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds induced by sunlight), directly affected trees (needle yellowing) and increased the susceptibility of trees to pests [103][104][105][106]. The pollution effect was aggravated by the elevated concentrations of ozone in large parts of the Carpathian Mountains [103][104][105][107][108]. Despite reduced industrial emissions in the late 1990s, high levels of tree defoliation in forests in Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Hungary were observed for years [106][109][110][111], most probably hindering regeneration and upward expansion (e.g., of silver fir; [112]) and contributing to Norway spruce dieback [113]. Improved emission regulations and technical developments enabled a significant decrease in pollutant loads on forests by the end of the 20th century. However, other abiotic factors, such as droughts, wind, frost, and snow/ice damage, and biotic factors (e.g., insect invasions) are the main reasons for tree damage in Carpathian forests [114][115][116][117][118], and current and future developments related to climate change are the main challenges for forest management in the Carpathian Mountains.

References

  1. Czajka, B.; Łajczak, A.; Kaczka, R.J.; Nicia, P. Timberline in the Carpathians: An overview. Geogr. Pol. 2015, 88, 7–34.
  2. Vincze, I.; Orbán, I.; Birks, H.H.; Pál, I.; Finsinger, W.; Hubay, K.; Marinova, E.; Jakab, G.; Braun, M.; Biró, T.; et al. Holocene treeline and timberline changes in the South Carpathians (Romania): Climatic and anthropogenic drivers on the southern slopes of the Retezat Mountains. Holocene 2017, 27, 1613–1630.
  3. Dudová, L.; Szabó, P. Holocene history of Larix in the Jeseníky Mts, Czech Republic . Preslia 2022, 94, 233–253.
  4. Feurdean, A.; Tanţău, I.; Fărcaş, S. Holocene variability in the range distribution and abundance of Pinus, Picea abies, and Quercus in Romania; implications for their current status. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2011, 30, 3060–3075.
  5. Ravazzi, C. Late Quaternary history of spruce in southern Europe. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 2002, 120, 131–177.
  6. Fărcaș, S.; Tanțău, I.; Turtureanu, P.D. Larix Decidua Mill. in Romania: Current and Past Distribution, Coenotic Prefer-ences, and Conservation Status. Contrib. Bot. 2013, 48, 1333–1342.
  7. Wilczyński, J.; Krajcarz, M.T.; Moskal-del Hoyo, M.; Alexandrowicz, W.P.; Miękina, B.; Pereswiet-Soltan, A.; Wertz, K.; Lipecki, G.; Marciszak, A.; Lõugas, L.; et al. Late Glacial and Holocene paleoecology and paleoenvironmental changes in the northern Carpathians foreland: The Żarska Cave (southern Poland) case study. Holocene 2020, 30, 905–922.
  8. Pató, Z.A.; Standovár, T.; Gałka, M.; Jakab, G.; Molnár, M.; Szmorad, F.; Magyari, E. Exposure matters: Forest dynamics reveal an early Holocene conifer refugium on a north facing slope in Central Europe. Holocene 2020, 30, 1833–1848.
  9. Moskal-del Hoyo, M. Open canopy forests of the loess regions of southern Poland: A review based on wood charcoal assemblages from Neolithic and Bronze Age archaeological sites. Quat. Int. 2021, 593–594, 204–223.
  10. Bodnariuc, A.; Bouchette, A.; Dedoubat, J.; Otto, T.; Fontugne, M.; Jalut, G. Holocene vegetational history of the Apuseni mountains, central Romania. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2002, 21, 1465–1488.
  11. Lestienne, M.; Jamrichová, E.; Kuosmanen, N.; Diaconu, A.; Schafstall, N.; Goliáš, V.; Kletetschka, G.; Šulc, V.; Kuneš, P. Development of high diversity beech forest in the eastern Carpathians. J. Biogeogr. 2023, 50, 699–714.
  12. Carter, V.A.; Bobek, P.; Moravcová, A.; Šolcová, A.; Chiverrell, R.C.; Clear, J.L.; Finsinger, W.; Feurdean, A.; Tanţău, I.; Magyari, E.; et al. The role of climate-fuel feedbacks on Holocene biomass burning in upper-montane Carpathian forests. Glob. Planet. Chang. 2020, 193, 103264.
  13. Feurdean, A.; Florescu, G.; Vannière, B.; Tanţău, I.; O‘Hara, R.B.; Pfeiffer, M.; Hutchinson, S.M.; Gałka, M.; Moskal-del Hoyo, M.; Hickler, T. Fire has been an important driver of forest dynamics in the Carpathian Mountains during the Holocene. For. Ecol. Manag. 2017, 389, 15–26.
  14. Gałka, M.; Loisel, J.; Knorr, K.; Diaconu, A.; Obremska, M.; Teickner, H.; Feurdean, A. How degraded are the peatland and forest ecosystems in the Bieszczady Mountains (Central Europe)? An assessment using long-term records. Land Degrad. Dev. 2023, 34, 1246–1262.
  15. Wiezik, M.; Jamrichová, E.; Máliš, F.; Beláňová, E.; Hrivnák, R.; Hájek, M.; Hájková, P. Transformation of West-Carpathian primeval woodlands into high-altitude grasslands from as early as the Bronze Age. Veg. Hist. Archaeobot. 2023, 32, 205–220.
  16. Czerwiński, S.; Margielewski, W.; Gałka, M.; Kołaczek, P. Late Holocene transformations of lower montane forest in the Beskid Wyspowy Mountains (Western Carpathians, Central Europe): A case study from Mount Mogielica. Palynology 2020, 44, 355–368.
  17. Diaconu, A.-C.; Tanţău, I.; Knorr, K.-H.; Borken, W.; Feurdean, A.; Panait, A.; Gałka, M. A multi-proxy analysis of hydroclimate trends in an ombrotrophic bog over the last millennium in the Eastern Carpathians of Romania. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclim. Palaeoecol. 2020, 538, 109390.
  18. Fărcaş, S.; Tanţău, I.; Mîndrescu, M.; Hurdu, B. Holocene vegetation history in the Maramureş Mountains (Northern Romanian Carpathians). Quat. Int. 2013, 293, 92–104.
  19. Feurdean, A.; Willis, K.J. The usefulness of a long-term perspective in assessing current forest conservation management in the Apuseni Natural Park, Romania. For. Ecol. Manag. 2008, 256, 421–430.
  20. Feurdean, A.; Gałka, M.; Tanţău, I.; Geantă, A.; Hutchinson, S.M.; Hickler, T. Tree and timberline shifts in the northern Romanian Carpathians during the Holocene and the responses to environmental changes. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2016, 134, 100–113.
  21. Florescu, G.; Hutchinson, S.M.; Kern, Z.; Mîndrescu, M.; Cristea, I.; Mihăilă, D.; Łokas, E.; Feurdean, A. Last 1000 years of environmental history in Southern Bucovina, Romania: A high resolution multi-proxy lacustrine archive. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclim. Palaeoecol. 2017, 473, 26–40.
  22. Finsinger, W.; Fevre, J.; Orbán, I.; Pál, I.; Vincze, I.; Hubay, K.; Birks, H.H.; Braun, M.; Tóth, M.; Magyari, E.K. Holocene fire-regime changes near the treeline in the Retezat Mts. (Southern Carpathians, Romania). Quat. Int. 2018, 477, 94–105.
  23. Jamrichová, E.; Petr, L.; Jiménez-Alfaro, B.; Jankovská, V.; Dudová, L.; Pokorný, P.; Kołaczek, P.; Zernitskaya, V.; Čierniková, M.; Břízová, E.; et al. Pollen-inferred millennial changes in landscape patterns at a major biogeographical interface within Europe. J. Biogeogr. 2017, 44, 2386–2397.
  24. Kapcia, M.; Mueller-Bieniek, A. An insight into Bronze Age subsistence strategy in forested Carpathian foothills, based on plant macro-remains. Archaeol. Anthr. Sci. 2019, 11, 2879–2895.
  25. Kołaczek, P.; Margielewski, W.; Gałka, M.; Apolinarska, K.; Płóciennik, M.; Gąsiorowski, M.; Buczek, K.; Karpińska-Kołaczek, M. Five centuries of the Early Holocene forest development and its interactions with palaeoecosystem of small landslide lake in the Beskid Makowski Mountains (Western Carpathians, Poland)—High resolution multi-proxy study. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 2017, 244, 113–127.
  26. Kołaczek, P.; Karpińska-Kołaczek, M.; Madeja, J.; Kalinovych, N.; Szczepanek, K.; Gębica, P.; Harmata, K. Interplay of climate-human-vegetation on the north-eastern edge of the Carpathians (Western Ukraine) between 7500 and 3500 calibrated years BP. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2016, 119, 609–629.
  27. Kołaczek, P.; Buczek, K.; Margielewski, W.; Gałka, M.; Rycerz, A.; Woszczyk, M.; Karpińska-Kołaczek, M.; Marcisz, K. Development and degradation of a submontane forest in the Beskid Wyspowy Mountains (Polish Western Carpathians) during the Holocene. Holocene 2021, 31, 1716–1732.
  28. Magyari, E.; Vincze, I.; Orbán, I.; Bíró, T.; Pál, I. Timing of major forest compositional changes and tree expansions in the Retezat Mts during the last 16,000 years. Quat. Int. 2018, 477, 40–58.
  29. Orbán, I.; Birks, H.H.; Vincze, I.; Finsinger, W.; Pál, I.; Marinova, E.; Jakab, G.; Braun, M.; Hubay, K.; Bíró, T.; et al. Treeline and timberline dynamics on the northern and southern slopes of the Retezat Mountains (Romania) during the late glacial and the Holocene. Quat. Int. 2018, 477, 59–78.
  30. Peters, M.; Friedmann, A.; Stojakowits, P.; Metzner-Nebelsick, C. Holocene vegetation history and environmental change in the Lăpuş Mountains, north-west Romania. Palynology 2020, 44, 441–452.
  31. Popa, I.; Kern, Z. Long-term summer temperature reconstruction inferred from tree-ring records from the Eastern Carpathians. Clim. Dyn. 2009, 32, 1107–1117.
  32. Rybníčková, E.; Rybníček, K. Pollen and macroscopic analyses of sediments from two lakes in the High Tatra mountains, Slovakia. Veg. Hist. Archaeobot. 2006, 15, 345–356.
  33. Tanţǎu, I.; Geantǎ, A.; Feurdean, A.; Tǎmaş, T. Pollen Analysis from a High Altitude Site in Rodna Mountains (Romania). Carpathian J. Earth Environ. Sci. 2014, 9, 23–30.
  34. Tanţău, I.; Feurdean, A.; de Beaulieu, J.-L.; Reille, M.; Fărcaş, S. Holocene vegetation history in the upper forest belt of the Eastern Romanian Carpathians. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclim. Palaeoecol. 2011, 309, 281–290.
  35. Wacnik, A.; Nalepka, D.; Granoszewski, W.; Walanus, A.; Madeyska, E.; Cywa, K.; Szczepanek, K.; Cieślak, E. Development of modern forest zones in the Beskid Niski Mts. and adjacent area (Western Carpathians) in the late Holocene: A palaeobotanical perspective. Quat. Int. 2016, 415, 303–324.
  36. Wiezik, M.; Petr, L.; Jankovská, V.; Hájková, P.; Jamrichová, E.; Hrivnák, R.; Hillayová, M.K.; Jarčuška, B.; Máliš, F.; Hájek, M. Western-Carpathian mountain spruce woodlands at their southern margin: Natural or Anthropogenic Origin? Preslia 2020, 92, 115–135.
  37. Kapustová, V.; Pánek, T.; Hradecký, J.; Zernitskaya, V.; Hutchinson, S.M.; Mulková, M.; Sedláček, J.; Bajer, V. Peat bog and alluvial deposits reveal land degradation during 16th- and 17th-century colonisation of the Western Carpathians (Czech Republic). Land Degrad. Dev. 2018, 29, 894–906.
  38. Kozak, J.; Troll, M.; Widacki, W. Semi-Natural Landscapes of the Western Beskidy Mts. Ekol. Bratisl. 1999, 18, 53–62.
  39. Árvai, M.; Popa, I.; Mîndrescu, M.; Nagy, B.; Kern, Z. Dendrochronology and radiocarbon dating of subfossil conifer logs from a peat bog, Maramureş Mts, Romania. Quat. Int. 2016, 415, 6–14.
  40. Kukulak, J. Charcoal in alluvium of mountain streams in the Bieszczady Mountains (Polish Carpathians) as a carrier of information on the local palaeoenvironment. Geochronometria 2014, 41, 294–305.
  41. Sâvulescu, I.; Mihai, B. Mapping forest landscape change in Iezer Mountains, Romanian Carpathians. AGIS approach based on cartographic heritage, forestry data and remote sensing imagery. J. Maps 2011, 7, 429–446.
  42. Bałazy, R. Forest dieback process in the Polish mountains in the past and nowadays—Literature review on selected topics. Folia For. Pol. Ser. A 2020, 62, 184–198.
  43. Kukulak, J. Sedimentary record of early wood burning in alluvium of mountain streams in the Bieszczady range, Polish Carpathians. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclim. Palaeoecol. 2000, 164, 167–175.
  44. Šamonil, P.; Vrška, T. Trends and cyclical changes in natural fir-beech Forests at the north-western edge of the Carpathians. Folia Geobot. 2007, 42, 337–361.
  45. Volařík, D.; Hédl, R. Expansion to abandoned agricultural land forms an integral part of silver fir dynamics. For. Ecol. Manag. 2013, 292, 39–48.
  46. Vrška, T.; Adam, D.; Hort, L.; Kolář, T.; Janík, D. European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) rotation in the Carpathians—A developmental cycle or a linear trend induced by man? For. Ecol. Manag. 2009, 258, 347–356.
  47. Mihai, B.; Savulescu, I.; Sandric, I. Change Detection Analysis (1986–2002) of Vegetation Cover in Romania: A Study of Al-pine, Subalpine, and Forest Landscapes in the Iezer Mountains, Southern Carpathians. Mt. Res. Dev. 2007, 27, 250–258.
  48. Price, B.; Kaim, D.; Szwagrzyk, M.; Ostapowicz, K.; Kolecka, N.; Schmatz, D.R.; Wypych, A.; Kozak, J. Legacies, socio-economic and biophysical processes and drivers: The case of future forest cover expansion in the Polish Carpathians and Swiss Alps. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2017, 17, 2279–2291.
  49. Kozak, J.; Ziółkowska, E.; Vogt, P.; Dobosz, M.; Kaim, D.; Kolecka, N.; Ostafin, K. Forest-Cover Increase Does Not Trigger Forest-Fragmentation Decrease: Case Study from the Polish Carpathians. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1472.
  50. Munteanu, C.; Kuemmerle, T.; Keuler, N.S.; Müller, D.; Balázs, P.; Dobosz, M.; Griffiths, P.; Halada, L.; Kaim, D.; Király, G.; et al. Legacies of 19th century land use shape contemporary forest cover. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2015, 34, 83–94.
  51. Vasile, M. Formalizing commons, registering rights: The making of the forest and pasture commons in the Romanian Carpathians from the 19th century to post-socialism. Int. J. Commons 2018, 12, 170–201.
  52. Trotsiuk, V.; Svoboda, M.; Janda, P.; Mikolas, M.; Bace, R.; Rejzek, J.; Samonil, P.; Chaskovskyy, O.; Korol, M.; Myklush, S. A mixed severity disturbance regime in the primary Picea abies (L.) Karst. forests of the Ukrainian Carpathians. For. Ecol. Manag. 2014, 334, 144–153.
  53. Schurman, J.S.; Trotsiuk, V.; Bače, R.; Čada, V.; Fraver, S.; Janda, P.; Kulakowski, D.; Labusova, J.; Mikoláš, M.; Nagel, T.A.; et al. Large-scale disturbance legacies and the climate sensitivity of primary Picea abies forests. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2018, 24, 2169–2181.
  54. Frankovič, M.; Janda, P.; Mikoláš, M.; Čada, V.; Kozák, D.; Pettit, J.L.; Nagel, T.A.; Buechling, A.; Matula, R.; Trotsiuk, V.; et al. Natural dynamics of temperate mountain beech-dominated primary forests in Central Europe. For. Ecol. Manag. 2021, 479, 118522.
  55. Koutecký, T.; Ujházy, K.; Volařík, D.; Ujházyová, M.; Máliš, F.; Gömöryová, E.; Bače, R.; Ehrenbergerová, L.; Glončák, P.; Hofmeister, J.; et al. Disturbance history drives current compositional and diversity patterns of primary Picea abies (L.) Karst. forest vegetation. For. Ecol. Manag. 2022, 520, 120387.
  56. Zielonka, T.; Holeksa, J.; Fleischer, P.; Kapusta, P. A tree-ring reconstruction of wind disturbances in a forest of the Slovakian Tatra Mountains, Western Carpathians. J. Veg. Sci. 2010, 21, 31–42.
  57. Després, T.; Vítková, L.; Bače, R.; Čada, V.; Janda, P.; Mikoláš, M.; Schurman, J.S.; Trotsiuk, V.; Svoboda, M. Past disturbances and intraspecific competition as drivers of spatial pattern in primary spruce forests. Ecosphere 2017, 8, e02037.
  58. Spînu, A.P.; Petrițan, I.C.; Mikoláš, M.; Janda, P.; Vostarek, O.; Čada, V.; Svoboda, M. Moderate- to High-Severity Disturbances Shaped the Structure of Primary Picea Abies (L.) Karst. Forest in the Southern Carpathians. Forests 2020, 11, 1315.
  59. Kuemmerle, T.; Olofsson, P.; Chaskovskyy, O.; Baumann, M.; Ostapowicz, K.; Woodcock, C.E.; Houghton, R.A.; Hostert, P.; Keeton, W.S.; Radeloff, V.C. Post-Soviet farmland abandonment, forest recovery, and carbon sequestration in western Ukraine. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2011, 17, 1335–1349.
  60. Ramankutty, N. Global Cropland and Pasture Data from 1700–2007; LUGE (Land Use and the Global Environment) Laboratory, Department of Geography, McGill University: Montreal, QC, Canada, 2012; Available online: http://www.geog.mcgill.ca/nramankutty/Datasets/Datasets.html (accessed on 25 April 2023).
  61. Caudullo, G.; Welk, E.; San-Miguel-Ayanz, J. Chorological maps for the main European woody species. Data Brief 2017, 12, 662–666.
  62. Munteanu, C.; Kuemmerle, T.; Boltiziar, M.; Butsic, V.; Gimmi, U.; Halada, L.; Kaim, D.; Király, G.; Konkoly-Gyuró, É.; Kozak, J.; et al. Forest and agricultural land change in the Carpathian region—A meta-analysis of long-term patterns and drivers of change. Land Use Policy 2014, 38, 685–697.
  63. Kozak, J. Forest Cover Change in the Western Carpathians in the Past 180 Years: A Case Study in the Orawa Region in Poland. Mt. Res. Dev. 2003, 23, 369–375.
  64. Sobala, M. Determinants of marginal area reforestation in the Western Carpathians in the light of consecutive aerial photographs. Appl. Geomatics 2022, 14, 135–145.
  65. Kroczak, R.; Fidelus-Orzechowska, J.; Bucała-Hrabia, A.; Bryndal, T. Land use and land cover changes in small Carpathian catchments between the mid-19th and early 21st centuries and their record on the land surface. J. Mt. Sci. 2018, 15, 2561–2578.
  66. Sobala, M.; Rahmonov, O.; Myga-Piatek, U. Historical and contemporary forest ecosystem changes in the Beskid Mountains (southern Poland) between 1848 and 2014. iForest 2017, 10, 939–947.
  67. Kędra, M.; Szczepanek, R. Land cover transitions and changing climate conditions in the Polish Carpathians: Assessment and management implications. Land Degrad. Dev. 2019, 30, 1040–1051.
  68. Affek, A.N.; Wolski, J.; Zachwatowicz, M.; Ostafin, K.; Radeloff, V.C. Effects of post-WWII forced displacements on long-term landscape dynamics in the Polish Carpathians. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2021, 214, 104164.
  69. Kozak, J.; Estreguil, C.; Troll, M. Forest cover changes in the northern Carpathians in the 20th century: A slow transition. J. Land Use Sci. 2007, 2, 127–146.
  70. Kozak, J.; Estreguil, C.; Vogt, P. Forest cover and pattern changes in the Carpathians over the last decades. Eur. J. For. Res. 2007, 126, 77–90.
  71. Bucała, A. The impact of human activities on land use and land cover changes and environmental processes in the Gorce Mountains (Western Polish Carpathians) in the past 50 years. J. Environ. Manag. 2014, 138, 4–14.
  72. Tudoran, G.M.; Zotta, M. Adapting the planning and management of Norway spruce forests in mountain areas of Romania to environmental conditions including climate change. Sci. Total. Environ. 2020, 698, 133761.
  73. Mohytych, V.; Sułkowska, M.; Klisz, M. Reproduction of silver fir (Abies alba Mill) forests in the Ukrainian Carpathians. Folia For. Pol. Ser. A 2019, 61, 156–158.
  74. Bucała-Hrabia, A. Land use changes and their catchment-scale environmental impact in the Polish Western Carpathians during transition from centrally planned to free-market economics. Geogr. Pol. 2018, 91, 171–196.
  75. Ortyl, B.; Kasprzyk, I. Land abandonment and restoration in the Polish Carpathians after accession to the European Union. Environ. Sci. Policy 2022, 132, 160–170.
  76. Kolecka, N.; Kozak, J.; Kaim, D.; Dobosz, M.; Ostafin, K.; Ostapowicz, K.; Wężyk, P.; Price, B. Understanding farmland abandonment in the Polish Carpathians. Appl. Geogr. 2017, 88, 62–72.
  77. Kozak, J.; Ostapowicz, K.; Szablowska-Midor, A.; Widacki, W. Land Abandonment in the Western Beskidy Mts and Its En-vironmental Background. Ekol. Bratisl. 2004, 23 (Suppl. S1), 116–126.
  78. Griffiths, P.; Müller, D.; Kuemmerle, T.; Hostert, P. Agricultural land change in the Carpathian ecoregion after the breakdown of socialism and expansion of the European Union. Environ. Res. Lett. 2013, 8, 045024.
  79. Kolecka, N.; Kozak, J. Wall-to-wall parcel-level mapping of agricultural land abandonment in the Polish Carpathians. Land 2019, 8, 129.
  80. Kucsicsa, G.; Bălteanu, D. The influence of man-induced land-use change on the upper forest limit in the Romanian Carpathians. Eur. J. For. Res. 2020, 139, 893–914.
  81. Dinca, L.; Nita, M.; Hofgaard, A.; Alados, C.; Broll, G.; Borz, S.; Wertz, B.; Monteiro, A. Forests dynamics in the montane–alpine boundary: A comparative study using satellite imagery and climate data. Clim. Res. 2017, 73, 97–110.
  82. Łajczak, A.; Spyt, B. Differentiation of vertical limit of forest at the Babia Góra Mt., the Western Carpathian Mountains. Geogr. Pol. 2018, 91, 217–242.
  83. Kucsicsa, G.; Bălteanu, D. The effects of biophysical and anthropogenic factors on the recent upper forest-cover upward shift in the Romanian Carpathians. J. Veg. Sci. 2023, 34, 13176.
  84. Skrobala, V.M.; Popovych, V.V.; Bosak, P.V.; Shuplat, T.I. Prediction of changes in the vegetation cover of Ukraine due to climate warming. Natsional'nyi Hirnychyi Universytet. Nauk. Visnyk 2022, 4, 96–105.
  85. Sitko, I.; Troll, M. Timberline Changes in Relation to Summer Farming in the Western Chornohora (Ukrainian Carpathians). Mt. Res. Dev. 2008, 28, 263–271.
  86. Weisberg, P.; Shandra, O.; Becker, M. Landscape Influences on Recent Timberline Shifts in the Carpathian Mountains: Abiotic Influences Modulate Effects of Land-Use Change. Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res. 2013, 45, 404–414.
  87. Kucsicsa, G.; Dumitrică, C. Spatial modelling of deforestation in Romanian Carpathian Mountains using GIS and Logistic Regression. J. Mt. Sci. 2019, 16, 1005–1022.
  88. Ciobotaru, A.-M.; Andronache, I.; Ahammer, H.; Radulovic, M.; Peptenatu, D.; Pintilii, R.-D.; Drăghici, C.-C.; Marin, M.; Carboni, D.; Mariotti, G.; et al. Application of Fractal and Gray-Level Co-Occurrence Matrix Indices to Assess the Forest Dynamics in the Curvature Carpathians—Romania. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6927.
  89. Sobala, M.; Rahmonov, O. The Human Impact on Changes in the Forest Range of the Silesian Beskids (Western Carpathians). Resources 2020, 9, 141.
  90. Kuemmerle, T.; Hostert, P.; Radeloff, V.C.; Perzanowski, K.; Kruhlov, I. Post-socialist forest disturbance in the Carpathian border region of Poland, Slovakia, and Ukraine. Ecol. Appl. 2007, 17, 1279–1295.
  91. Lozynskyy, R.; Zubyk, A. Transformation of the Rural Settlement Network in the Carpathian Region of Ukraine (1989–2020). Eur. Countrys. 2022, 14, 281–301.
  92. Drăghici, C.C.; Andronache, I.; Ahammer, H.; Peptenatu, D.; Pintilii, R.-D.; Ciobotaru, A.-M.; Simion, A.G.; Dobrea, R.C.; Diaconu, D.C.; Vișan, M.-C.; et al. Spatial Evolution of Forest Areas in the Northern Carpathian Mountains of Romania. Acta Montan. Slovaca 2017, 22, 95–106.
  93. Vasile, M. The other frontier: Forest rush and small-scale timbermen of postsocialist Transylvania. J. Peasant. Stud. 2022, 49, 429–454.
  94. Ciobotaru, A.-M.; Andronache, I.; Ahammer, H.; Jelinek, H.F.; Radulovic, M.; Pintilii, R.-D.; Peptenatu, D.; Drăghici, C.-C.; Simion, A.-G.; Papuc, R.-M.; et al. Recent Deforestation Pattern Changes (2000–2017) in the Central Carpathians: A Gray-Level Co-Occurrence Matrix and Fractal Analysis Approach. Forests 2019, 10, 308.
  95. Mihai, B.; Săvulescu, I.; Rujoiu-Mare, M.; Nistor, C. Recent forest cover changes (2002–2015) in the Southern Carpathians: A case study of the Iezer Mountains, Romania. Sci. Total. Environ. 2017, 599–600, 2166–2174.
  96. Griffiths, P.; Kuemmerle, T.; Kennedy, R.E.; Abrudan, I.V.; Knorn, J.; Hostert, P. Using annual time-series of Landsat images to assess the effects of forest restitution in post-socialist Romania. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 118, 199–214.
  97. Haliuc, A.; Feurdean, A.; Mîndrescu, M.; Frantiuc, A.; Hutchinson, S.M. Impacts of forest loss in the eastern Carpathian Mountains: Linking remote sensing and sediment changes in a mid-altitude catchment (Red Lake, Romania). Reg. Environ. Chang. 2019, 19, 461–475.
  98. Griffiths, P.; Kuemmerle, T.; Baumann, M.; Radeloff, V.C.; Abrudan, I.V.; Lieskovsky, J.; Munteanu, C.; Ostapowicz, K.; Hostert, P. Forest disturbances, forest recovery, and changes in forest types across the Carpathian ecoregion from 1985 to 2010 based on Landsat image composites. Remote Sens. Environ. 2014, 151, 72–88.
  99. Falťan, V.; Petrovič, F.; Gábor, M.; Šagát, V.; Hruška, M. Mountain Landscape Dynamics after Large Wind and Bark Beetle Disasters and Subsequent Logging—Case Studies from the Carpathians. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 3873.
  100. Konôpka, B.; Šebeň, V.; Merganičová, K. Forest Regeneration Patterns Differ Considerably between Sites with and without Windthrow Wood Logging in the High Tatra Mountains. Forests 2021, 12, 1349.
  101. Fleischer, P.; Pichler, V.; Flaische, P.; Holko, L.; Máli, F.; Gömöryová, E.; Cudlín, P.; Holeksa, J.; Michalová, Z.; Homolová, Z.; et al. Forest ecosystem services affected by natural disturbances, climate and land-use changes in the Tatra Mountains. Clim. Res. 2017, 73, 57–71.
  102. Kuemmerle, T.; Kozak, J.; Radeloff, V.C.; Hostert, P. Differences in forest disturbance among land ownership types in Poland during and after socialism. J. Land Use Sci. 2009, 4, 73–83.
  103. Badea, O.; Tanase, M.; Georgeta, J.; Anisoara, L.; Peiov, A.; Uhlirova, H.; Pajtik, J.; Wawrzoniak, J.; Shparyk, Y. Forest health status in the Carpahian Mountains over the period 1997. Environ. Pollut. 2004, 130, 93–98.
  104. Bytnerowicz, A.; Badea, O.; Barbu, I.; Fleischer, P.; Frączek, W.; Gancz, V.; Godzik, B.; Grodzińska, K.; Grodzki, W.; Karnosky, D.; et al. New international long-term ecological research on air pollution effects on the Carpathian Mountain forests, Central Europe. Environ. Int. 2003, 29, 367–376.
  105. Muzika, R.M.; Guyette, R.P.; Zielonka, T.; Liebhold, A.M. The influence of O3, NO2 and SO2 on growth of Picea abies and Fagus sylvatica in the Carpathian Mountains. Environ. Pollut. 2004, 130, 65–71.
  106. Modrzyński, J. Defoliation of older Norway spruce (Picea abies /L./ Karst.) stands in the Polish Sudety and Carpathian mountains. For. Ecol. Manag. 2003, 181, 289–299.
  107. Bytnerowicz, A.; Godzik, S.; Poth, M.; Anderson, I.; Szdzuj, J.; Tobias, C.; Macko, S.; Kubiesa, P.; Staszewski, T.; Fenn, M. Chemical Composition of Air, Soil and Vegetation in Forests of the Silesian Beskid Moutains, Poland. Water Air Soil Pollut. 1999, 116, 141–150.
  108. Bičárová, S.; Sitková, Z.; Pavlendová, H. Ozone phytotoxicity in the Western Carpathian Mountains in Slovakia. For. J. 2016, 62, 77–88.
  109. Badea, O.; Neagu, S.; Bytnerowicz, A.; Silaghi, D.; Barbu, I.; Iacoban, C.; Popescu, F.; Andrei, M.; Preda, E.; Iacob, C.; et al. Long-term monitoring of air pollution effects on selected forest ecosystems in the Bucegi-Piatra Craiului and Retezat Mountains, southern Carpathians (Romania). iForest 2011, 4, 49–60.
  110. Antoni, J.; Šomšák, L.; Jansk’y, L. Reversing the Decline of Secondary Spruce Forests in Slovakia’s Western Carpathians. Mt. Res. Dev. 2000, 20, 130–131.
  111. Main-Knorn, M.; Hostert, P.; Kozak, J.; Kuemmerle, T. How pollution legacies and land use histories shape post-communist forest cover trends in the Western Carpathians. For. Ecol. Manag. 2009, 258, 60–70.
  112. Gazda, A.; Kościelniak, P.; Hardy, M.; Muter, E.; Kędra, K.; Bodziarczyk, J.; Frączek, M.; Chwistek, K.; Różański, W.; Szwagrzyk, J. Upward expansion of distribution ranges of tree species: Contrasting results from two national parks in Western Carpathians. Sci. Total. Environ. 2019, 653, 920–929.
  113. Maňkovská, B.; Godzik, B.; Badea, O.; Shparyk, Y.; Moravčík, P. Chemical and morphological characteristics of key tree species of the Carpathian Mountains. Environ. Pollut. 2004, 130, 41–54.
  114. Bytnerowicz, A.; Frączek, W. Large-scale monitoring of air pollution in remote and ecologically important areas. Geogr. Pol. 2012, 85, 25–38.
  115. Michel, A.; Prescher, A.-K.; Schwärzel, K. Forest Condition in Europe: 2019 Technical Report of ICP Forests; Report under the UNECE Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (Air Convention); UNECE: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019.
  116. Holeksa, J.; Zielonka, T.; Żywiec, M.; Fleischer, P. Identifying the disturbance history over a large area of larch–spruce mountain forest in Central Europe. For. Ecol. Manag. 2016, 361, 318–327.
  117. Hroššo, B.; Mezei, P.; Potterf, M.; Majdák, A.; Blaženec, M.; Korolyova, N.; Jakuš, R. Drivers of Spruce Bark Beetle (Ips typographus) Infestations on Downed Trees after Severe Windthrow. Forests 2020, 11, 1290.
  118. Synek, M.; Janda, P.; Mikoláš, M.; Nagel, T.A.; Schurman, J.S.; Pettit, J.L.; Trotsiuk, V.; Morrissey, R.C.; Bače, R.; Čada, V.; et al. Contrasting patterns of natural mortality in primary Picea forests of the Carpathian Mountains. For. Ecol. Manag. 2020, 457, 117734.
More
Information
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register : , ,
View Times: 170
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 17 Jan 2024
1000/1000
Video Production Service