Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Alyona Andreeva
 -- 1382 2023-11-16 09:08:26 |
2 Reference format revised.
Lindsay Dong
 + 2 word(s) 1384 2023-11-20 02:15:24 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Maksanova, L.; Bardakhanova, T.; Budaeva, D.; Mikheeva, A.; Lubsanova, N.; Sharaldaeva, V.; Eremko, Z.; Andreeva, A.; Ayusheeva, S.; Khrebtova, T. Ecotourism Development in Russian Areas under Nature Protection. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/51653 (accessed on 30 June 2024).
Maksanova L, Bardakhanova T, Budaeva D, Mikheeva A, Lubsanova N, Sharaldaeva V, et al. Ecotourism Development in Russian Areas under Nature Protection. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/51653. Accessed June 30, 2024.
Maksanova, Lyudmila, Taisiya Bardakhanova, Darima Budaeva, Anna Mikheeva, Natalia Lubsanova, Victoria Sharaldaeva, Zinaida Eremko, Alyona Andreeva, Svetlana Ayusheeva, Tatyana Khrebtova. "Ecotourism Development in Russian Areas under Nature Protection" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/51653 (accessed June 30, 2024).
Maksanova, L., Bardakhanova, T., Budaeva, D., Mikheeva, A., Lubsanova, N., Sharaldaeva, V., Eremko, Z., Andreeva, A., Ayusheeva, S., & Khrebtova, T. (2023, November 16). Ecotourism Development in Russian Areas under Nature Protection. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/51653
Maksanova, Lyudmila, et al. "Ecotourism Development in Russian Areas under Nature Protection." Encyclopedia. Web. 16 November, 2023.
Ecotourism Development in Russian Areas under Nature Protection
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/su151813661

Ecotourism has become an important area of development for Russian protected areas (PAs), which have begun to offer a variety of ecotourism services. Russia, along with other countries, adheres to a variety of concepts and tools for the development of ecotourism in PAs. Efforts are being made in the parks to create favorable conditions for ecotourism development. These efforts include improving management practices, implementing functional zoning strategies, developing conceptual and design solutions, developing infrastructure, securing funding, engaging local communities, and promoting ecotourism services. 

ecotourism areas under nature protection national parks

1. Introduction

The development of ecotourism in Russia is on the state’s strategic agenda [1]. The ecotourism policy of Russia is associated with the development of ecotourism in protected areas (PAs), which are undergoing transformation under the influence of the global concept of PAs “benefits beyond borders” [2]. Initially created to protect unique landscapes and wildlife, Russian PAs are increasingly functioning as tourist destinations that offer ecotourism services. This is reflected in changes in legislation and the implementation of national projects.
Ecotourism is increasingly being perceived as a lifestyle option that allows contemporary individuals to acquire knowledge, broaden their perspectives, and challenge themselves and push their limits while experiencing a sense of freedom [3]. Nevertheless, the meaning of ecotourism tends to vary according to people’s different perspectives. Some individuals may experience nature from the comfort of their hotel, while others may choose to forego conventional resort amenities and explore the culture and nature of the local communities. Studies conducted in various countries have revealed that ecotourism practices that have been successful can uphold the sustainability standards of the whole tourism industry [4][5].
Ecotourism is currently experiencing rapid growth and is expected to grow seven times faster than the rest of the tourism industry [6]. Researchers estimate that world’s terrestrial PAs already receive more than eight billion recreational visitors per year [7]. The global ecotourism market is expected to grow from 157.76 billion USD in 2021 to 185.43 billion USD in 2022 at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 17.5% and reach 299.03 billion USD in 2026 at a compound annual growth rate of 12.7% [8].
Despite the widespread support for ecotourism, the debate continues on the feasibility of achieving a more sustainable form of tourism in line with the principles of the global concept of sustainable development [9]. Some authors argue that it is a fallacy to consider ecotourism as a pathway to sustainable development, claiming that ecotourism is promoted primarily for marketing purposes, allowing companies to gain a “green advantage” in a competitive market [10]. In late 1999, Richard W. Butler warned that ecotourism development in sensitive and fragile areas without the necessary infrastructure may not be able to sustain even moderate levels of use [11]. As ecotourism continues to grow in popularity, it is critical to identify any negative impacts of tourism activities on the environment [12].
Weaver D. and Lawton L. believe that today’s PA systems are in deep crisis due to four interrelated factors: (1) the increased consumption of natural resources associated with population growth; (2) reduced public funding affecting the ability of PAs to perform critical ecological functions; (3) chronic underfunding resulting in increased reliance on visitor income; (4) increasing demand for outdoor recreation [13]. These factors influence the growth of visitor pressure, especially in PAs located near major population centers, transportation corridors and hubs, and/or areas of tourist activity.
Meanwhile, many governments are adopting diverse concepts, models, and tools for ecotourism development in PAs based on international recommendations for sustainable ecotourism, their own traditions, public policies, accumulated experience, and the characteristics of their PAs [14][15][16].

2. The Russian Approach to Ecotourism Development in PAs

Since the adoption of the Durban Agreement, the country’s priorities and approaches to the development of PAs have changed [17]. The isolationist approach to managing PAs, which has been in place for many decades and involves the complete isolation of these areas, is being replaced by the integration approach [18].
In October 2010, during a government meeting on the development of PAs, it was decided to set a course for the development of ecotourism. It was agreed to begin by creating legal conditions that would support recreational and tourist activities in national parks and nature reserves. Russia then adopted the Concept of Development of Federal Protected Areas for the period up to 2020. This concept not only defines the development of educational tourism as a special type of ecotourism, but also recognizes the role of PA as an equal participant in the tourism industry [19]. During the years of implementation of the concept, significant budgetary investments have been made in the creation of infrastructure facilities for ecological education and tourism.
Ecotourism has become an important area of development for Russian PAs, which have begun to offer a variety of ecotourism services [5]. For example, in 2021, the total number of visitors to eco-trails in PAs was 13,774,281 people, which is 40% more than in 2019 [20], p. 149. At the same time, it should be noted that Russia’s share in the global market of ecotourism services is still insignificant.
As ecotourism continues to grow in popularity, there has been a corresponding increase in the number of studies on issues related to ecotourism, including the assessment of ecotourism resources, development planning, support measures, the involvement of the local community, and the analysis of international cooperation [21][22][23][24].
Russian researchers have a shared understanding of the fundamental elements of ecotourism, such as nature education, respecting local residents’ interests, and ecosystem preservation. However, there is still no universally recognized and standardized definition of ecotourism [25]. Many definitions of ecotourism are reliant on those provided by international environmental and tourism organizations [26]. According to National regulatory documents (GOST), ecotourism is defined as nature-based tours that aim to explore natural and cultural attractions while promoting respect for nature and supporting conservation efforts [27].
Given that Russian ecotourism policy is linked to PAs, the significant aspects of ecotourism include (i) natural orientation of tourism; (ii) increasing the responsibility of producers and consumers of ecotourism services; (iii) the conservation, restoration, and rational use of natural resources; (iv) education, volunteerism, environmental culture and awareness; (v) the involvement of local residents of natural areas in economic and social activities to promote ecotourism and environmental protection; and (vi) the development and support of ecotourism infrastructure.
Ecotourism is now a significant factor influencing the functioning of PAs, and as such, is reflected in the goals and mechanisms of their management. The Russian approach to the development of ecotourism in PAs is determined by the state policy, which includes legislative, regulatory, investment, organizational, economic and informational measures (Figure 1). It presents the results of the analysis of the institutional conditions for streamlining the solution of specific tasks of the integrated ecotourism development in protected areas, which are contained in Russian legislative documents, concepts, programs, norms and rules.
Sustainability 15 13661 g001
Figure 1. Key documents and measures for the development of ecotourism in Russian PAs. Source: compiled by the authors.
Various measures are taken to organize ecotourism in PAs, and these measures depend on the PA status, whether it is federal, regional or local. Revisions in the fundamental law governing protected areas are essential to enable the effective functioning of all lower categories of PAs. The quality infrastructure and accessibility of eco-tourism services depend on the willingness of those managing the protected areas to foster the development of ecotourism. The majority of protected areas have initiated this task by modifying their functioning processes [28]. Several initiatives, including new ecotourism concepts and programs for certain protected areas (PAs) [3], the enhanced functional zoning of national parks [29][30], the development of eco-trails [31], and the building of infrastructure inside PAs [32], p. 176, have been introduced.
The market for ecotourism has been growing in nearly all regions of Russia. The 231 PAs across 68 regions have developed measures aimed at integrating the environmental, recreational, and educational activities of the PAs into the socio-economic development of their respective regions [28]. Several PAs, especially nature reserves and national parks, still receive state funding to support nature conservation, ecotourism infrastructure, education, and other related purposes [20], p. 176. During the period of 2020–2021, 146 museums, 296 visitor centers, 1799 eco-trails and routes were created in federal PAs [20][32], p. 152, p. 176.
The goal is to create ecotourism infrastructure in 32 national parks by 2024, while also providing a safe, accessible, and comfortable environment for all visitors, including people with disabilities, the elderly, and children. This is aimed at promoting tourism products [19]. According to the authors, there are few studies on ecotourism development in Russian PAs in the modern scientific literature, particularly outside Russia.

References

  1. Strategy for the Development of Tourism in the Russian Federation until 2035. Available online: https://strategy24.ru/rf/news/strategiya-razvitiya-turizma-v-rossiyskoy-federatsii-do-2035-goda (accessed on 23 December 2022). (In Russian).
  2. Benefits Beyond Boundaries. In Proceedings of the Vth IUCN World Parks Congress, Durban, South Africa, 8–17 September 2003; IUCN: Gland, Switzerland, 2005; p. 306.
  3. Dzhandzhugazova, E.; Iljina, E.; Latkin, A.; Davidivich, A.; Siganova, V. Problems of Development of Ecological Tourism on the territory of National Parks of Russia. Ekoloji 2019, 28, 4913–4917.
  4. UNWTO. Compendium of Best Practices and Recommendations for Ecotourism in Asia and the Pacific; UNWTO: Madrid, Spain, 2012; p. 128.
  5. Best Practices Ecological Tourism Subjects of Russian Federation; REU Them G.V.Plekhanova: Moscow, Russia, 2018; p. 168. (In Russian)
  6. Samal, R.; Dash, M. Ecotourism, biodiversity conservation, and local livelihoods: Understanding the convergence and divergence. Int. J. Geoheritage Park. 2022, 11, 1–20.
  7. Balmford, A.; Green, J.M.H.; Anderson, M.; Beresford, J.; Huang, C.; Naidoo, R.; Walpole, M.; Manica, A. Walk on the Wild Side: Estimating the Global Magnitude of Visits to Protected Areas. PLoS Biol. 2015, 13, 1–6.
  8. Ecotourism Global Market Report—2022. Available online: https://www.thebusinessresearchcompany.com/report/ecotourism-global-market-report (accessed on 1 December 2022).
  9. Asmelash, A.G.; Kumar, S. Assessing progress of tourism sustainability: Developing and validating sustainability indicators. Tour. Manag. 2019, 71, 67–83.
  10. Liu, Z. Sustainable tourism development: A critique. J. Sustain. Tour. 2003, 11, 459–475.
  11. Butler, R.W. Sustainable tourism: A state-of-the-art review. Tour. Geogr. 1999, 1, 7–25.
  12. Ouboter, D.A.; Kadosoe, V.S.; Ouboter, P.E. Impact of ecotourism on abundance, diversity and activity patterns of medium-large terrestrial mammals at Brownsberg Nature Park, Suriname. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0250390.
  13. Weaver, D.; Lawton, L. A new visitation paradigm for protected areas. Tour. Manag. 2017, 60, 140–146.
  14. Miller-Rushing, A.J.; Primack, R.B.; Ma, K.; Zhou, Z.-Q. A Chinese approach to protected areas: A case study comparison with the United States. Biol. Conserv. 2017, 210-B, 101–112.
  15. Bekele, H.; Teshome, E.; Asteray, M. Assessing protected areas for ecotourism development: The case of Maze National Park, Ethiopia. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2017, 8, 25–31.
  16. Dayneko, D.; Dayneko, A.; Dayneko, V. Analysis of Ecological tourism development in Russia and USA. E3S Web Conf. 2021, 311, 09003.
  17. Danilina, N.R. The Role of Nature Reserves in the System of Russian Specially Protected Natural Areas: History and Modernity. In Russia in the Surrounding World: 2010. Sustainable Development: Ecology, Politics, Economics. Analytical Yearbook; MNEPU Publishing House: Moscow, Russia, 2010; pp. 121–146. (In Russian)
  18. Zvyagina, E.S.; Rybakova, M.V. Ecotourism as an environmentally-responsible practice in the management of specially protected natural territories of the Russian Federation. Public Adm. E-J. 2015, 48, 50–65. (In Russian)
  19. Belenko, N.G.; Kuliev, T.B. Problems and prospects for the development of ecological tourism in the Russian Federation in the context of a new model for managing specially protected natural areas. In Proceedings of the IV International Scientific and Practical Conference “Dobrodeev Readings—2020“, Moscow, Russia, 9 December 2020. (In Russian).
  20. State Report “On the State and Protection of the Environment of the Russian Federation in 2021”; Ministry of Natural Resources of Russia; Lomonosov Moscow State University: Moscow, Russia, 2022; p. 686. (In Russian)
  21. Golubchikov, Y.N.; Kruzhalin, K.V.; Khlynov, A.Y.; Khlynova, N.V. Eco-tourism within protected areas. Vestn. Natl. Tour. Acad. 2014, 2, 19–22. (In Russian)
  22. Nikolaeva, J.V.; Bogoliubova, N.M.; Shirin, S.S. Ecological tourism in the state image policy structure. Experience and problems of modern Russia. Curr. Issues Tour. 2018, 21, 547–566.
  23. Mkrtchan, G.M.; Blam, I.Y. Ecotourism and Conservation in Time of COVID 19 Pandemic and beyond. ECO J. 2021, 2, 25–39. (In Russian)
  24. Tikhomirova, A.V. Ecological tourism in specially protected natural territories. Bull. South Ural. State Univ. Ser. “Law” 2021, 20, 109–114. (In Russian)
  25. Shabalina, N.V.; Nikanorova, A.D.; Aleksanrova, E.E. Ecotourism: Features and problems of development in Russia. Univ. Tour. Serv. Assoc. Bull. 2021, 15, 4–14. (In Russian)
  26. Vasilyeva, M.I. The legal definition of the concept of ecotourism. Lex Russ. 2020, 73, 34–52. (In Russian)
  27. GOST P 56642-2021. Tourism Services. Ecological Tourism. General Requirements. Federal Agency for Technical Regulation and Metrology: Moscow, Russia, 2021. Available online: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200182520 (accessed on 10 February 2023).
  28. Maksanova, L.B.Z.; Kharitonova, O.B.; Andreeva, A.M. Creating models of integrated development of ecotourism in Russian protected areas. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 885, 012056.
  29. Shidlovskaya, Y.A. Evolution of functional zoning of national park Curonian Spit. Vestn. Immanuel Kant Balt. Fed. Univ. 2015, 1, 72–78. (In Russian)
  30. Budaeva, D.G.; Maksanova, L.B.Z.; Sharaldaeva, V.D. Evolution of functional zoning of the Tunkinsky national park. Proc. Russ. Geogr. Soc. 2022, 154, 66–76. (In Russian)
  31. Kop’yova, А.V.; Maslovskaya, O.V.; Petrova, E.S.; Ivanova, O.G. Formation of a Model of the Functional-Spatial Organization of the Ecological Route. Ojkumena Reg. Res. 2021, 2, 74–81. (In Russian)
  32. State Report “On the State and Protection of the Environment of the Russian Federation in 2020"; Ministry of Natural Resources of Russia; Lomonosov Moscow State University: Moscow, Russia, 2021; p. 864. (In Russian)
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Others
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Lyudmila Maksanova
,
Taisiya Bardakhanova
,
Darima Budaeva
,
Anna Mikheeva
,
Natalia Lubsanova
,
Victoria Sharaldaeva
,
Zinaida Eremko
,
Alyona Andreeva
,
Svetlana Ayusheeva
,
Tatyana Khrebtova
View Times: 414
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 20 Nov 2023
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Video Production Service
    Feedback