Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 -- 1288 2023-11-09 08:10:09 |
2 Reference format revised. -22 word(s) 1266 2023-11-12 12:27:12 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Li, L.; Khan, A.; Rameli, M.R.M. Relationship between Prosocial Behavior/Well-Being in Vocational Education. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/51329 (accessed on 21 July 2024).
Li L, Khan A, Rameli MRM. Relationship between Prosocial Behavior/Well-Being in Vocational Education. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/51329. Accessed July 21, 2024.
Li, Linwei, Aqeel Khan, Mohd Rustam Mohd Rameli. "Relationship between Prosocial Behavior/Well-Being in Vocational Education" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/51329 (accessed July 21, 2024).
Li, L., Khan, A., & Rameli, M.R.M. (2023, November 09). Relationship between Prosocial Behavior/Well-Being in Vocational Education. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/51329
Li, Linwei, et al. "Relationship between Prosocial Behavior/Well-Being in Vocational Education." Encyclopedia. Web. 09 November, 2023.
Relationship between Prosocial Behavior/Well-Being in Vocational Education
Edit

Prosocial behaviors, which benefit others and promote harmonious interpersonal relationships, have been linked to well-being. Engaging in prosocial behaviors provides individuals with a sense of purpose and fulfillment, promotes positive feelings and moods, and enhances social integration and connection, leading to the development of interpersonal relationships. These factors contribute to an improved sense of self-worth, belonging, and connectedness, which ultimately enhances well-being.

prosocial behavior basic psychological needs well-being vocational students

1. Introduction

Vocational education is critical in preparing students with practical skills for specific careers [1]. Vocational education plays a pivotal role in equipping students with practical skills and knowledge that are directly applicable to specific careers [2]. This form of education is particularly important in the context of China, where the demand for skilled workers is rapidly increasing due to the country’s industrial growth and technological advancements [3]. Vocational education not only provides students with a pathway to gainful employment but also contributes significantly to the overall economic development of the nation [4]. However, research exploring the well-being of vocational students is relatively limited compared to other student populations [5][6]. Understanding the factors contributing to vocational students’ WB is essential for promoting their overall development and educational outcomes.
Well-being is a complex and multifaceted construct encompassing various dimensions, which include both subjective and objective aspects. It has been well-established that higher levels of well-being are associated with numerous benefits for students, for example, improved academic performance, higher levels of engagement, enhanced social relationships, and better mental health [7][8]. To provide clarity regarding the specific dimension of well-being under investigation. In the context of educational outcomes in China, promoting students’ well-being (WB) has become a crucial objective. Research has demonstrated that students with higher levels of WB tend to exhibit better academic achievements, higher motivation, and improved overall adjustment [9]. Particularly in vocational education, where students are preparing for distinct careers, prosocial behavior holds implications for their future professional interactions and community contributions [10][11]. Consequently, understanding the factors contributing to WB, such as prosocial behavior, is paramount for educational psychologists and practitioners striving to create supportive learning environments and enhance students’ educational experiences.
Prosocial behavior, characterized by voluntary actions intended to benefit others [12], has been widely recognized as a significant contributor to WB. Engaging in PB fosters positive relationships and social cohesion and contributes to individuals’ WB [13][14]. Furthermore, self-determination theory (SDT) posits that individuals have basic psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness, which are crucial for optimal psychological functioning and well-being [15]. The fulfillment of these BPNs is positively associated with individuals’ WB [16]. The existing literature examining the relationship between prosocial behavior (PB) and well-being (WB) has presented mixed findings, leaving a research gap in the understanding of the precise nature of this association [17][18][19]. While some studies have reported a positive link between PB and WB, others have yielded conflicting results [20][21]. These discrepancies underscore the complexity of this relationship and highlight the need for more context-specific investigations to better understand the underlying mechanisms at play. Additionally, the mechanisms through which PB influences or affects WB remain unclear and have been understudied [22].

2. Relationship between Prosocial Behavior and Well-Being in Vocational Education

2.1. Prosocial Behavior and Well-Being

Prosocial behavior refers to actions that benefit others, groups, or society as a whole [23]. These behaviors encompass acts such as helping, sharing, volunteering, cooperation, and charitable giving [24][25][26][27]. Recent studies have further expanded the understanding of prosocial behaviors, highlighting their relevance in various contexts, including educational settings [28][29]. From an individual standpoint, engaging in prosocial behavior contributes to personal self-esteem and satisfaction [30][31]. On an interpersonal level, prosocial behavior enhances social interactions and fosters interpersonal harmony [32]. Furthermore, prosocial behaviors are considered symbols of social responsibility and play a crucial role in maintaining social harmony [33].
While previous research has primarily focused on contextual factors related to helping behavior, there has been a growing interest in studying prosocial behavior within group and cross-group contexts among students [34]. Specifically, Chinese society places a strong emphasis on interconnectedness and social harmony, valuing virtues such as benevolence, compassion, and mutual support [35]. Acts of helping others are often perceived as integral to nurturing collective well-being and maintaining societal balance [36]. Moreover, the influence of Confucian principles, deeply ingrained in Chinese cultural values, underscores the significance of altruistic actions and moral integrity in interpersonal interactions [37][38]. Within this context, understanding the manifestation and effects of prosocial behavior among students can provide valuable insights into the cultural dynamics and social norms that influence their altruistic actions. Research examining prosocial behavior among students in China can illuminate the cultural factors that shape their attitudes and behaviors, as well as inform the development of culturally sensitive interventions and educational strategies that promote prosocial behavior and enhance the well-being of Chinese students.
With the increasing prominence of psychological issues among vocational students, improving their well-being has become a crucial area of interest for researchers and society at large. Prosocial behaviors, which benefit others and promote harmonious interpersonal relationships, have been linked to well-being [39]. Engaging in prosocial behaviors provides individuals with a sense of purpose and fulfillment [27], promotes positive feelings and moods [40][41], and enhances social integration and connection, leading to the development of interpersonal relationships [42][43][44]. These factors contribute to an improved sense of self-worth, belonging, and connectedness, which ultimately enhances well-being [45][46][47][48].
However, the underlying mediating mechanisms (i.e., how PB influences WB) among vocational students remain a topic for ongoing inquiry, even though PB has been found to increase levels of WB. Additionally, previous research has explored various mediators that might explain the link between prosocial behaviors and well-being. For instance, studies have examined the role of basic psychological needs, social support, self-esteem, and positive affect as potential mediators [35][49][50]. The theory of basic psychological needs, developed by Deci and Ryan [51], posits that satisfying the needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness is crucial for promoting individual growth and enhancing well-being. According to this theory, individuals have an innate tendency towards self-integration and growth, which relies on the fulfillment of these basic psychological needs. Autonomy need refers to the desire for self-determination and control over one’s life, competence refers to the desire for mastery and effectiveness, and relatedness refers to the desire for close connections with others. When these needs are satisfied, individuals are more likely to experience positive physical and mental health outcomes [52]. Conversely, when these needs are not met, individuals may become ill-adjusted and experience negative impacts on their well-being [53][54].
Research has consistently demonstrated that satisfying basic psychological needs positively influences well-being, leading to increased vitality, positive emotions, and self-esteem, and reduced anxiety and depression [55][56][57]. Moreover, it has been found that prosocial behavior plays a significant role in satisfying these basic psychological needs and contributing to overall well-being [58][59]. Prosocial behavior has been shown to fulfill individuals’ autonomy needs by allowing them to express their internal values and exercise a sense of control over their actions [35]. When individuals engage in acts of kindness or cooperation, they have the opportunity to make choices aligned with their personal values, thus satisfying their need for autonomy. Additionally, prosocial behavior fulfills competence needs by providing opportunities to demonstrate one’s skills and usefulness to others [58]. By engaging in prosocial behaviors, individuals can showcase their competencies and capabilities, contributing to their sense of competence and self-efficacy. Furthermore, prosocial behavior satisfies individuals’ relatedness needs by reducing social isolation and fostering social connections [51]. When individuals engage in prosocial acts, they often experience a sense of connection with others and strengthen their social bonds. By helping others or engaging in cooperative behaviors, individuals create opportunities for social interaction and belongingness, fulfilling their need for relatedness. These findings highlight the significance of prosocial behavior as a means of satisfying basic psychological needs and contributing to overall well-being.

References

  1. Kuczera, M.; Goujon, A. Vocational Education and Training for a Global Economy: Lessons from Four Countries; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2018.
  2. Lerman, R.I.; Schmidt, J. The Role of Vocational Education and Training in the Labor Market Outcomes of Disadvantaged Youth. J. Vocat. Educ. Train. 2019, 71, 1–19.
  3. Zhang, Y.; Li, Y. The Development of Vocational Education in China: A Historical Review. J. Vocat. Educ. Train. 2019, 71, 163–177.
  4. Wang, X.; Li, Y. Vocational Education, and Economic Development in China: A Study of Guangdong Province. J. Vocat. Educ. Train. 2019, 71, 369–384.
  5. Wang, X.; Zhang, Y. The Relationship between Vocational Students’ Psychological Capital and Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction. J. Vocat. Educ. Train. 2021, 73, 1–18.
  6. Hui, E.K.; Tsang, S.K.; Law, B.M. The Relationship between Vocational Students’ Career Adaptability and Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction. J. Vocat. Educ. Train. 2022, 74, 1–18.
  7. Suldo, S.M.; Shaunessy, E.; Hardesty, R. Relationships among stress, coping, and mental health in high-achieving high school students. Psychol. Sch. 2008, 45, 273–290.
  8. Huebner, E.S.; Suldo, S.M.; Smith, L.C.; McKnight, C.G. Life satisfaction in children and youth: Empirical foundations and implications for school psychologists. Psychol. Sch. 2004, 41, 81–93.
  9. Chen, L.; Wang, L.; Qiu, X.H.; Yang, X.X.; Qiao, Z.X.; Yang, Y.J.; Liang, Y. Depression among Chinese university students: Prevalence and socio-demographic correlates. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e58379.
  10. Lerner, R.M.; Lerner, J.V.; Phelps, E. Thriving across the life span: Toward an integrative science of positive development. Am. Psychol. 2019, 74, 918–933.
  11. Wang, L.; Ye, J.H.; Lee, Y.S.; Miao, C.J. Analysis of influencing factors of subjective career unsuccessfulness of vocational college graduates from the Department of Navigation in China. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 1015190.
  12. Eisenberg, N.; Fabes, R.A.; Spinrad, T.L. Prosocial development. Handb. Child Psychol. 2006, 3, 646–718.
  13. Layous, K.; Nelson, S.K.; Oberle, E.; Schonert-Reichl, K.A.; Lyubomirsky, S. Kindness counts: Prompting prosocial behavior in preadolescents boosts peer acceptance and well-being. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e51380.
  14. Post, S.G.; Ng, L.E.; Fischel, J.E.; Bennett-Woods, D.; King, P. Altruism and well-being: The role of generalized trust in others. J. Happiness Stud. 2019, 20, 1215–1230.
  15. Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L. Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness; Guilford Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2017.
  16. Vansteenkiste, M.; Ryan, R.M.; Soenens, B. Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions. Motiv. Sci. 2020, 44, 1–31.
  17. Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 2000, 25, 54–67.
  18. Vallerand, R.J.; Blanchard, C.; Mageau, G.A.; Koestner, R.; Ratelle, C.; Léonard, M.; Gagné, M.; Marsolais, J. Les passions de l’ame: On obsessive and harmonious passion. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2003, 85, 756–767.
  19. Bono, J.E.; McCullough, M.E. Positive effects of prosocial behavior on well-being: The role of personal values, stress recovery experiences, and mindfulness. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2019, 70, 271–291.
  20. Niemiec, C.P.; Ryan, R.M. Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom applying self-determination theory to educational practice. J. Educ. Psychol. 2009, 101, 762.
  21. Caprara, G.V.; Alessandri, G.; Eisenberg, N.; Kupfer, A.; Steca, P.; Caprara, M.G.; Abela, J.R.Z. The positivity scale: Concurrent and factor validation in a large sample of young adults. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2018, 114, 877.
  22. Huppert, F.A.; So, T.T.C. Flourishing across Europe: Application of a new conceptual framework for defining well-being. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2013, 368, 20110339.
  23. Jin, J. Prosocial behavior: A review of the past and future directions. Adv. Psychol. 2008, 1, 135–142.
  24. Bekkers, R.; Wiepking, P. A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: Eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving. Nonprofit Volunt. Sect. Q. 2011, 40, 924–973.
  25. Brief, A.P.; Motowidlo, S.J. Prosocial organizational behaviors. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1986, 11, 710–725.
  26. Feng, X.; Guo, Y. The relationship between prosocial behavior and life satisfaction: A meta-analysis. J. Happiness Stud. 2016, 17, 1163–1180.
  27. Wilson, J.Q. The moral sense revisited. Wilson Q. 2012, 36, 18–29.
  28. Hay, D.F.; Paine, A.L.; Perra, O.; Cook, K.V.; Hashmi, S.; Robinson, C.; Kairis, V.; Slade, R. Prosocial and aggressive behavior: A longitudinal study. Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Dev. 2021, 86, 7–103.
  29. Fabes, R.A.; Carlo, G.; Kupanoff, K.; Laible, D. Early adolescence and prosocial/moral behavior I: The role of individual processes. J. Early Adolesc. 1999, 19, 5–16.
  30. Laible, D.J.; Carlo, G.; Roesch, S.C. Pathways to self-esteem in late adolescence: The role of parent and peer attachment, empathy, and social behaviours. J. Adolesc. 2004, 27, 703–716.
  31. Yates, M.; Youniss, J. Community service and political-moral identity in adolescents. J. Res. Adolesc. 1996, 6, 271–284.
  32. Campbell, W.K.; Twenge, J.M.; Carter, N.T. The self-esteem motive in social comparison. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1999, 76, 404–418.
  33. Penner, L.A.; Dovidio, J.F.; Piliavin, J.A.; Schroeder, D.A. Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2005, 56, 365–392.
  34. Zeng, Y.; Li, Y.; Liang, X. The relationship between prosocial behavior and academic achievement among Chinese college students: The mediating role of academic self-efficacy. Soc. Behav. Personal. Int. J. 2011, 39, 1097–1104.
  35. Liang, Y.-W.; Chen, Y.-M.; Chen, Y.-L. Social support and well-being among college students in Taiwan: An analysis of mediating effects. J. Coll. Couns. 2016, 19, 42–54.
  36. Zygmont, A.; Doliński, W.; Zawadzka, D.; Pezdek, K. Uplifted by Dancing Community: From Physical Activity to Well-Being. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 3535.
  37. Yang, K.-S. The psychological structure of Confucianism: A conceptual empirical inquiry. In Indigenous and Cultural Psychology: Understanding People in Context; Kim, U., Berry, J.W., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 21–44.
  38. Kou, Y.; Lu, L.; Wu, J. The relationship between values and prosocial behavior in Chinese children. J. Moral Educ. 2004, 33, 369–385.
  39. Diener, E.; Oishi, S.; Lucas, R.E. Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2010, 61, 403–425.
  40. Carlson, M.; Charlin, V.; Miller, N. Positive mood and helping behavior: A test of six hypotheses. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1988, 55, 211–229.
  41. Hu, T.; Zhang, D.; Wang, J. A meta-analysis of the trait resilience and mental health. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2016, 102, 69–75.
  42. Caprara, G.V.; Steca, P. Prosocial agency: The contribution of values and self-efficacy beliefs to prosocial behavior across ages. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 2005, 24, 218–247.
  43. Grant, A.M.; Gino, F. A little thanks goes a long way: Explaining why gratitude expressions motivate prosocial behavior. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2010, 98, 946–955.
  44. Mogilner, C. The pursuit of happiness: Time, money, and social connection. Psychol. Sci. 2010, 21, 1348–1354.
  45. Deci, E.L.; Ryan, R.M. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior (Perspectives in Social Psychology); Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1985.
  46. Schlegel, R.J.; Hicks, J.A.; Arndt, J.; King, L.A. Thine own self: True self-concept accessibility and meaning in life. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2011, 100, 196–210.
  47. Stillman, T.F.; Lambert, N.M. The benefits of giving for the giver. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 2013, 17, 375–398.
  48. Fritz, M.M.; Lyubomirsky, S.; Boehm, J.K. The role of prosocial behavior in promoting positive affect during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Happiness Stud. 2021, 22, 2117–2137.
  49. Chen, B.; Vansteenkiste, M.; Beyers, W.; Boone, L.; Deci, E.L.; Van der Kaap-Deeder, J.; Duriez, B.; Lens, W.; Matos, L.; Mouratidis, A.; et al. Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration and need strength across four cultures. Motiv. Emot. 2015, 39, 216–236.
  50. Zhang, J.-W.; Howell, R.T.; Stolarski, M. Comparing three methods to measure a balanced time perspective: The relationship between a balanced time perspective and subjective well-being. J. Posit. Psychol. 2013, 8, 430–439.
  51. Deci, E.L.; Ryan, R.M. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol. Inq. 2000, 11, 227–268.
  52. Miller, D.T.; Gramzow, R.H. The erosion of autonomy: Motivational consequences of self-determination in social relationships. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2016, 110, 756–777.
  53. Sheldon, K.M.; Gunz, A. Psychological needs as basic motives, not just experiential requirements. J. Personal. 2009, 77, 1467–1492.
  54. Sheldon, K.M.; Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L.; Kasser, T. The independent effects of goal contents and motives on well-being: It’s both what you pursue and why you pursue it. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2004, 30, 475–486.
  55. Ilardi, B.C.; Leone, D.; Kasser, T.; Ryan, R.M. Employee and supervisor ratings of motivation: Main effects and discrepancies associated with job satisfaction and adjustment in a factory setting. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 1993, 23, 1789–1805.
  56. La Guardia, J.G.; Ryan, R.M.; Couchman, C.E.; Deci, E.L. Within-person variation in security of attachment: A self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2000, 79, 367–384.
  57. Sheldon, K.M.; Ryan, R.M.; Rawsthorne, L.J.; Ilardi, B. Trait self and true self: Cross-role variation in the Big-Five personality traits and its relations with psychological authenticity and subjective well-being. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1997, 73, 1380–1393.
  58. Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 2000, 55, 68–78.
  59. Weinstein, N.; Ryan, R.M. A self-determination theory approach to understanding stress incursion and responses. Stress Health J. Int. Soc. Investig. Stress 2010, 26, 173–185.
More
Information
Subjects: Psychology
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register : , ,
View Times: 226
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 12 Nov 2023
1000/1000
Video Production Service