Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Lei Zhou
 -- 4991 2023-11-01 02:59:25 |
2 format change
Peter Tang
 Meta information modification 4991 2023-11-01 03:21:53 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Fang, X.; Zhou, L.; Chen, C.; Danilov, D.L.; Qiao, F.; Li, H.; Notten, P.H.L. Theoretical Calculations Facilitating Catalysis for Advanced Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/51025 (accessed on 21 July 2024).
Fang X, Zhou L, Chen C, Danilov DL, Qiao F, Li H, et al. Theoretical Calculations Facilitating Catalysis for Advanced Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/51025. Accessed July 21, 2024.
Fang, Xue-Ting, Lei Zhou, Chunguang Chen, Dmitri L. Danilov, Fen Qiao, Haitao Li, Peter H. L. Notten. "Theoretical Calculations Facilitating Catalysis for Advanced Lithium-Sulfur Batteries" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/51025 (accessed July 21, 2024).
Fang, X., Zhou, L., Chen, C., Danilov, D.L., Qiao, F., Li, H., & Notten, P.H.L. (2023, November 01). Theoretical Calculations Facilitating Catalysis for Advanced Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/51025
Fang, Xue-Ting, et al. "Theoretical Calculations Facilitating Catalysis for Advanced Lithium-Sulfur Batteries." Encyclopedia. Web. 01 November, 2023.
Theoretical Calculations Facilitating Catalysis for Advanced Lithium-Sulfur Batteries
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/molecules28217304

Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries have emerged as one of the most hopeful alternatives for energy storage systems. The poor conductivity of sulfur cathodes induces sluggish redox kinetics. The shuttling of polysulfides incurs the heavy failure of electroactive substances. Tremendous efforts in experiments to seek efficient catalysts have achieved significant success.

calculations catalysis Lithium-sulfur batteries polysulfides conversion kinetics

1. Introduction

Energy is of increasingly important concern for global sustainable development since non-renewable fossil fuels are being rapidly depleted. Developing clean and renewable energies, such as wind and solar, is essential to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Intermittence and fluctuation are crucial challenges when converting these energies to electricity. It is a priority to develop advanced energy storage technologies to utilize wind or solar electricity effectively. Rechargeable batteries provide the invaluable advantage of highly flexible energy storage on various levels [1][2]. Various rechargeable batteries have been developed, including lead–acid, nickel–metal hydride, and lithium-ion batteries [3][4][5]. However, they are plagued by low energy density, which fails to meet the enormous energy storage demands of various application scenarios, like electric vehicles and grids.
Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries have emerged among various advanced battery systems as one of the most promising candidates [6][7][8]. Due to the electrochemical reaction of lithium metal with sulfur by redox processes (2Li + S = Li2S), Li-S batteries display a considerably huge energy density of 2600 Wh·kg−1, greatly exceeding the current lithium-ion battery systems. Furthermore, they possess the considerable merits of abundant resources, environmental friendliness, and safety. Despite tremendous efforts in exploiting reliable Li-S batteries, their commercialization still has hurdles [9]. The poor conductivity of sulfur cathodes inevitably leads to sluggish electrochemical reaction kinetics with high battery polarization. Moreover, polysulfide intermediates can be dissolved and then diffuse to the electrolyte, resulting in the erosion of lithium anodes. The polysulfide shuttling leads to the heavy failure of electroactive species and poor cycling stability of Li-S batteries. Therefore, it is crucial to synchronously alleviate the polysulfide shuttling and facilitate the electrochemical reaction kinetics, achieving the entire capability of Li-S batteries.
Designing reliable sulfur cathodes is an effective approach to improving the performance of Li-S batteries. Developing advanced sulfur host and separator-modified materials has been demonstrated as a practical approach to promoting cathode conductivity and accelerating sulfur electrochemical kinetics [10][11][12]. Carbons, metals, single atoms, and compounds have been employed as sulfur hosts, which significantly increase the capacity and cycling stability of Li-S batteries resulting from the strong anchoring and catalytic effects on sulfur species [13][14][15][16]. However, it is challenging to discover and screen these host materials by trial and error. Seeking regular theoretical methods for predicting and validating the essential properties of sulfur host materials can facilitate an understanding of electrocatalytic effects during the conversion process in Li-S batteries [17][18]. Theoretical calculations have proven to be a powerful method to examine the electrocatalytic mechanisms in Li-S batteries [19][20][21][22]. Unlike experimental approaches, theoretical calculations can predict the interaction of host materials with sulfur species on the atomic/molecular scale. This considerably facilitates the exploitation of advanced sulfur cathode materials for practical applications.
Theoretical calculations show tremendous advantages in assisting the design and screening of efficient catalyst materials for Li-S batteries. In particular, density functional theory (DFT) calculations have been extensively employed in Li-S batteries. DFT calculations can predict the physical/chemical properties of materials simply using the intrinsic properties of atoms instead of adding any empirical parameters. Currently, DFT is one of the most powerful techniques to simulate the electronic structures of catalyst materials and investigate the interaction between sulfur species and catalyst materials. Based on the DFT calculations, the behavior of catalyst materials can be well explained at the molecular level. The calculated results can further guide the tailoring and optimization of catalyst materials for Li-S batteries. In addition, the Gibbs free energy of the sulfur reduction reaction can be properly obtained with DFT calculations, which can act as an important indicator to evaluate and compare the activities of different catalyst materials. Moreover, the calculation of lithium-ion diffusion barriers and Li2S decomposition barriers can provide deep insights into the charge transfer mechanisms in Li-S batteries. All the calculations associated with experimental works accelerate the development of advanced catalyst materials for Li-S batteries.

2. Electronic Structures

The electronic structure of sulfur host materials essentially determines the electrocatalytic activity in Li-S battery conversion reactions. The electronic structure of sulfur host materials can be finetuned with various experimental approaches, such as doping, heterostructures, and defect engineering [23][24][25]. Therefore, it is essential to study the electronic structures of sulfur host materials computationally. This can support the planning of experiments and guide the interpretation of experimental results. DFT calculations are the typical method to study the electronic structures of sulfur hosts, including band structure, density of states, and the charge distribution between sulfur species and sulfur host molecules [26][27][28].

2.1. Band Structures

Electronic band structures reveal the electronic levels in crystal structures, which can be used to explain the electronic conductivity of crystals [29][30]. Since sulfur cathodes are electronic conductors, high conductivity benefits the electron transport and the conversion of sulfur species. Therefore, band structure calculations can guide the prediction and screening of efficient sulfur cathode materials. In particular, by calculating the band structures of electrode materials, the width of the band gap can be determined, revealing their conductivity. Materials possessing a negligible energy band gap show metallic properties. However, insulators originating from wide band gaps result in their low conductivity. Due to the relatively narrow band gaps of less than 3 eV, semiconductors display moderate conductivity and can further be enhanced by structure modulation.
DFT calculations have been used to explain the conductivity increase in catalysts by building heterostructures for Li-S batteries [31][32][33][34][35]. Tang and co-workers constructed Co3O4/ZnO heterojunctions embedded in N-doped carbon nanocages as sulfur hosts (CZO/HNC) [31]. DFT calculations confirmed that Co3O4/ZnO exhibited an optimized band structure with better conductivity. ZnO and Co3O4 possess broad band gaps of 3.39 and 1.56 eV, respectively, implying semiconducting properties. In contrast, the Co3O4/ZnO heterojunctions revealed a negligible energy band gap, suggesting high conductivity. This result was validated by four-probe resistivity experiments, in which Co3O4/ZnO heterojunctions displayed the highest conductivity of 6.6 × 10−3 S m−1. This heterostructure facilitated ion diffusion and promoted the polysulfide conversion with stable Li-S batteries, which was validated by the experimental results. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) of a symmetric cell indicated that CZO/HNC exhibited a stronger current response in contrast to Co3O4/HNC and ZnO/HNC. As a result, sulfur cathodes with CZO/HNC presented the optimized rate capability in comparison with the other two counterparts.
Recently, another paper on CoSe2@TiSe2-C heterostructures has also reported the band structures to predict the conductivity [32]. CoSe2@TiSe2-C possessed a minor energy band gap of 0.017 eV, which indicated a metallic nature. Relatively broad band gaps were observed in CoSe2 (0.589 eV) and TiSe2-C (0.024 eV). The highly conductive CoSe2@TiSe2-C was able to facilitate the conversion kinetics from polysulfides to Li2S and promote Li2S dissociation. When acting as the interlayer in Li-S batteries, CoSe2@TiSe2-C allowed the sulfur cathode to deliver the highest capacity.

2.2. Densities of States

Densities of states (DOS) are generally the state number at specific energy levels that electrons can occupy, i.e., the electron state number per unit energy per unit volume. The DOS can be an essential indicator to understand the physical properties of materials since they provide a simple approach to characterizing complex electronic structures. DOS calculations can ascertain the overall state distribution as a function of spacing and energy between energy bands in semiconductors. DOS are typically analyzed from two aspects: the local DOS (LDOS) and the partial (or projected) DOS (PDOS). The LDOS signify that specific atoms of the system contribute electronic states to various parts of the energy spectra. The PDOS indicate the projection of atomic orbitals (s, p, or d) on the densities of states, which provides contributions based on the angular momentum.
The DOS calculations play a critical role in predicting and analyzing the electrochemistry of Li-S batteries. The DOS analyses can readily identify the width of the band gap of electrode materials, which evaluates the conductivity of electrode materials. For instance, electrode materials with band gaps of more than 3 eV between the top of the valence band and the bottom of the conduction band are considered to have insulating properties. A band gap between 1 and 3 eV calculated from DOS indicates that electrode materials are semiconductors. Electrode materials with metallic conductivity present narrow band gaps of less than 1 eV. Therefore, a smaller band gap means a better conductivity for electrode materials. Since the electrochemical conversion of sulfur cathodes is rather sluggish due to the insulating nature of sulfur, catalyst materials with good conductivity are a prerequisite for rapid charge transfer and catalytic conversion of sulfur cathodes [16]. As a result, the electrochemical conversion of elemental sulfur to the discharging product Li2S is significantly accelerated owing to the enhanced conductivity of the electrode materials [17]. The detrimental shuttle effect of polysulfides can be further suppressed. Therefore, Li-S batteries are expected to achieve high sulfur utilization and excellent cycling performance.
Moreover, as the strong interaction between catalysts and sulfur species can affect the DOS of catalyst molecules, the detailed DOS analyses interpret the orbital overlapping or hybridization between sulfur species and catalyst molecules, implying the catalytic mechanisms of Li-S batteries. In addition, DOS calculations can also determine the d-band center (εd) of catalysts in Li-S batteries, which is a critical descriptor to analyze the catalytic activities [25][36]. According to the d-band theory, catalysts with a higher value of εd calculated from DOS suggest a stronger catalytic activity, which better promotes the conversion kinetics for Li-S batteries.

2.3. Charge Distribution

Understanding the interaction between molecules is beneficial to obtaining insights into the nature of intermolecular bonding. This understanding effectively guides the design of catalyst materials. Charge distribution calculations are powerful approaches to evaluating intermolecular interactions, which can uncover atoms’ electronic structures and chemical environments. With Bader charge analysis and differences in charge density, the charge transfer and the numerical values for the bond strength of interacting atoms or molecules can be evaluated.
In Li-S batteries, the adsorption and catalysis processes of sulfur species on catalysts involve complicated electron transfers, which are challenging to investigate with experimental approaches. By contrast, charge distribution analyses can clearly present the electron transfer and charge density at the interface of catalysts and sulfur species at the molecular level. Therefore, the chemical bonding interaction between catalyst molecules and sulfur species can be identified, contributing to the understanding of catalytic mechanisms in Li-S batteries.
Modulating the electronic state of metal phosphides, Zhou et al. incorporated N- and P-doped porous carbons into Ni and Co phosphides nanoparticles (NiCoP-NPPC) as catalysts for Li-S batteries [37]. The tailoring improved the reaction kinetics of sulfur cathodes and achieved a dendrite-free lithium anode. The authors analyzed the interaction between sulfur and transition metals using charge density difference analyses. In contrast to NPPC and CoP-NPPC, NiCoP-NPPC exhibited a higher electron density. Meanwhile, the accumulated and depleted charge might accelerate the charge transport from NPPC to NiCoP. The calculation results indicated a distinct interfacial charge interaction, improving the anchoring and considerably facilitating the electrochemical kinetics of sulfur cathodes. Consequently, sulfur cathodes with CoP-NPPC obtained a high initial capacity of 1184 mAh g−1 at 0.5 C.
By calculating the interfacial charge distribution, Lu et al. confirmed the presence of the built-in electric field (BIEF) in the NbB2-MXene heterostructure [38]. The redistributed charge and the defective boundaries in the heterostructure resulted in more exposed active sites, thus enlarging the anchoring sites and catalytic active sites. These structural advantages enhanced the electrochemical kinetics of the polysulfide conversion. When being used as the sulfur host, NbB2-MXene allowed sulfur cathodes to present a boosted rate performance, with a capacity of 679 mAh g−1 even at 2 C. Moreover, the composite cathodes maintained a high capacity of 866 mAh g−1 at 0.2 C after 100 cycles.
The charge density difference analyses can further support the DOS results of the bonding states. Yi et al.’s DOS calculation proved the Fe-S bonding of the adsorbed ∗LiS and ∗Li3S2 on the Fe single atoms (* is the active site of catalysts) [39]. The authors observed the clear accumulated charge between Fe and S atoms from the charge density difference. By inducing strain relaxation, Sun et al. tuned the structures of bimetallic MoNi4 nanoalloys [40]. The strained MoNi4 (s-MoNi4) balanced the anchoring and catalytic effects on Li-S batteries. The introduction of the lattice strain altered the bond length of Ni-Mo, broadening the d band and downshifting the d-band center toward the Fermi level. Using the Bader charges, the authors studied the charge transfer interaction of Li2S with s-MoNi4 and pure MoNi4. After adsorbing Li2S, s-MoNi4 accepted the charge of 0.8227 e, whereas MoNi4 accepted 0.9127 e. This result indicated that a slight charge transfer occurred between s-MoNi4 and Li2S, meaning a weaker charge interaction and thus facilitating the desorption of polysulfides.
Wan et al. analyzed the electronic distribution of the ultra-thin NiSe2-CoSe2 heterostructured nanosheets using charge density difference calculations [41]. In contrast to NiSe2 and CoSe2, NiSe2-CoSe2 displayed a localized enhancement of the positive/negative electron clouds. It can be concluded that more electron transfers occurred between the interfacial domains of NiSe2-CoSe2 heterostructures, which significantly anchored and catalyzed sulfur species. With simulated deformation charge density calculations, Dong et al. validated that the dual Fe-Co single-atom pairs exhibited stronger adsorption towards Li2S6 than Fe or Co single atoms [42]. The dual Fe-Co sites with combined effects induced the charge redistribution of atom pairs, promoting polysulfide reduction and Li2S decomposition. Wang et al. indicated an enhanced interaction between polysulfides and Ni3B nanoparticles on B-doped graphene (Ni3B/BG) [43]. The Bader charge calculations revealed more charge transfer from Li2S4 and Li2S to Ni3B/BG (0.813 and 0.592 e) than that to BG (0.592 and 0.092 e), which effectively accelerated their conversion kinetics. Furthermore, highly accumulated charge density was detected at the interface of Ni3B and BG. The charge redistribution allowed a smooth charge transport channel, boosting sulfur species’ redox kinetics.

3. Binding Energy between Sulfur Species and Catalysts

Since the adsorption of polysulfides is critical to suppressing the polysulfide shuttling, the investigation of the interactions of catalysts with sulfur species is beneficial to unraveling the adsorption mechanisms. Therefore, the binding energy can be a good indicator. Since different crystal surfaces of catalysts may possess different binding energies, the selection of representative surfaces for binding energy calculations is critical. X-ray diffraction characterization can provide reasonable surfaces of catalysts for calculations. In addition, choosing surfaces with different atom ratios is another approach because it can fairly evaluate the contribution of different surface atoms to anchoring sulfur species [44]. Binding energy calculations are now a typical approach to predicting or validating the adsorption ability of catalysts towards sulfur species [45]. The binding energy (Eb) between sulfur species and catalysts is defined as follows:
Eb = Et − Es − Ec,   
where Et, Es, and Ec represent the energies of sulfur species adsorbed on catalysts, sulfur species, and catalysts, respectively. A smaller negative Eb value means a stronger binding ability. In some reports, −Eb is defined to indicate the binding energy, i.e., a higher positive Eb value means a stronger binding ability.
Due to the intrinsic property of catalyst materials, their binding energies towards sulfur species vary. Generally, carbon-based catalysts show a relatively weak binding energy, while metal compounds and single atoms possess stronger adsorption towards sulfur species. For instance, Pu et al. compared the binding energies of Fe3P and pure carbon towards various sulfur species [46]. Fe3P displayed relatively high binding energies in a range of 0.55 to 2.95 eV towards sulfur species, which were stronger than those of pure carbon (0.43–0.65 eV). Due to the electronegativity difference, the sulfur from polysulfides readily interacted with the iron from Fe3P. The proper anchoring was beneficial to anchoring sulfur species and accelerating their catalytic conversion. Wang et al. calculated the binding energies of CoP towards sulfur species [47]. The results show that CoP (211) had an excellent adsorption capacity of 2–8 eV towards sulfur species. The similar binding energy of CoP towards sulfur species was also confirmed by Zhang et al. [48]. Structure regulation, like doping, can improve the binding energy of carbon-based catalyst materials [49][50]. Yang et al. validated that introducing pyridinic-N to porous carbon fibers resulted in a strong adsorption energy of −2.20 eV towards Li2S4 [51].
Metal sulfide catalysts display favorable adsorption and catalytic activities towards sulfur species [52][53]. Liu et al. revealed that the cation doping of MoS2 significantly promoted the anchoring and the catalytic effects on polysulfides compared to the inactive MoS2 [54]. V-doped MoS2 possessed stronger adsorption of polysulfides and allowed sulfur cathodes to have a high initial capacity of 1607 mAh g−1 at 0.2 C. Dai et al. validated that the Co-doped NiS2 (Co-NiS2) nanoparticles showed a stronger adsorption towards sulfur species than NiS2 [55].
A single component generally exhibits relatively weak adsorption towards sulfur species. Combining two or more components to construct heterostructures can overcome this shortage [52][56][57]. For example, Zeng et al. designed the ternary heterostructure Na0.67Ni0.25Mn0.75O2 (NNMO)-MnS2-Ni3S4 with three active centers to obtain cascade catalysis for polysulfides [58]. Based on the binding energy calculations, NNMO delivered higher binding energies for all sulfur species than MnS2 and Ni3S4. The binding energies of long-chain polysulfides on MnS2 were stronger than those on Ni3S4, while short-chain polysulfides were favorably anchored on Ni3S4 compared to MnS2. Finally, sulfur cathodes with the ternary heterostructure exhibited excellent rate performance. Wang et al. calculated the binding energy of Co3O4/ZnO heterostructures towards sulfur species [31]. The results suggested that Co3O4/ZnO displayed the strongest adsorption compared to the individual Co3O4 or ZnO. A similar conclusion has also been made by Wan et al., who confirmed that the NiSe2-CoSe2 heterostructure displayed enhanced adsorption of sulfur species compared to NiSe2 and CoSe2 [41].
Other metal compounds, like oxides and nitrides [59][60][61], have also shown strong adsorption towards sulfur species, which can effectively mitigate the shuttle effects. For example, Wang et al. designed a core-shelled heterostructure containing Ni3B nanoparticles dispersed on B-doped graphene (Ni3B/BG) to boost the reaction kinetics of Li-S batteries [43]. DFT calculations have determined the adsorption properties of polysulfides.

4. Gibbs Free Energy

Gibbs free energy, denoted as G, is defined as follows:
G = H − TS,  
where H, T, and S are the enthalpy, temperature, and entropy, respectively. The change in Gibbs free energy (ΔG) can indicate the chemical reaction direction under constant pressure and temperature. For example, when ΔG shows a positive value, the reaction cannot be spontaneous. Negative values correspond to spontaneous reactions. Since a catalytic reaction involves the adsorption and desorption of reactants on the catalyst’s surface, the ΔG calculations can evaluate the activities of catalysts and the rate-determining step. By calculating the correlation between overpotential and ΔG in the oxygen reduction reaction, Nørskov et al. successfully explained the activities of metal catalysts [62]. ΔG can be an effective descriptor for seeking idealized catalyst materials [50]. Similarly, the ΔG calculations have been applied to investigate the electrochemistry of Li-S batteries. For example, ΔG can reveal which reaction step is spontaneous and which reaction step is rate-determining in Li-S batteries [63].
Ji and co-workers initially employed the ΔG calculation to explain the catalytic activities of single-atom Co for sulfur cathodes [64]. Typically, the electrocatalytic sulfur reduction reaction from S8 to Li2S during discharging can be considered as follows:
*S8 + 2Li+ + 2e− → *Li2S8,  
3*Li2S8 + 2Li+ + 2e− → 4*Li2S6,   
2*Li2S6 + 2Li+ + 2e− → 3*Li2S4,  
*Li2S4 + 2Li+ + 2e− → 2*Li2S2,  
*Li2S2 + 2Li+ + 2e− → 2*Li2S,  
where * is the active site of catalysts. The calculated ΔG for the corresponding reaction process can be written as follows:
ΔG1 = G(*Li2S8) − G(*S8) − 2G(Li),  
ΔG2 = 4G(*Li2S6) − 3G(*Li2S8) − 2G(Li),  
ΔG3 = 3G(*Li2S4) − 2G(*Li2S6) − 2G(Li),  
ΔG4 = 2G(*Li2S2) − G(*Li2S4) − 2G(Li),  
ΔG5 = 2G(*LI2S) − G(*LI2S2) − 2G(LI).  
In Equations (3)–(7), G(Li+) + G(e−) are written in the form of G(Li), which is considered in the computational hydrogen electrode approach [62]. Therefore, during the sulfur reduction reaction (SRR) process, the rate-determining step can be determined by the calculated ΔG. Du et al. calculated the ΔG for two SRR catalysts: N-doped graphene (N/G) and single-atom Co in N-doped graphene (Co-N/G). They validated that the S8 reduction to Li2S8 was an exothermic spontaneous reaction in which ΔG < 0. The following reduction processes to discharge products are endothermic or almost thermoneutral. The rate-determining step was the conversion from Li2S2 to Li2S, which presented the highest ΔG. Co-N/G indicated a lower ΔG than N/G for the Li2S2 reduction, implying a more favorable reaction pathway. Based on the ΔG calculations, various catalyst materials have been predicted, such as single atoms [65], metal oxides [66][67][68], sulfides [69], nitrides [70][71], and heterostructures [72][73], which present accelerated conversion kinetics for Li-S batteries.
Because of the maximized atomic utilization and excellent catalytic activities, single atoms present accelerated conversion kinetics for sulfur cathodes. Single atoms with Fe [74], Co [75], Ni [76], Cu [77], and W [78] as active sites have been confirmed to be promising electrocatalysts, which considerably restrain the polysulfide shuttling. The coordination environment of single atoms plays a key role in catalytic activities. Zhang et al. noticed the catalytic activities of edge-distributed single-atom sites. To achieve edge-distributed single-atom Fe, they incorporated Fe single atoms in N-doped porous carbon (Fe-NPC) into CNTs [79]. This composition promoted polysulfide anchoring and conversion. The ΔG calculations supported the favorable catalytic activities resulting from the Fe-N4 moieties with edge distribution. In the rate-determining step, Fe-N4 with edge distribution decreased the Li2S deposition barrier (0.72 eV) compared to the in-plane Fe-N4 (0.87 eV), revealing faster redox kinetics. Meanwhile, the energy barrier of the Li2S4 reduction on Fe-N4 with edge distribution also decreased to 0.53 eV in contrast to that on the in-plane Fe-N4 surface (0.60 eV), implying promoted polysulfide conversion and hence a mitigated shuttle effect.
Recently, Ren et al. designed a single-atom Fe catalyst containing an S-doped periphery (Fe-NSC), which presented enhanced polysulfide adsorption and facilitated sulfur conversion [16]. Compared with the pristine Fe-N4 moieties, the Fe-NSC configuration had more accumulated charge density. The calculations indicated that the Fe-NSC-based catalysts decreased the ΔG of the Li2S deposition. This result showed a more favorable pathway for sulfur reduction at the Fe-NSC sites, thus achieving excellent cycling life of sulfur cathodes. By regulating the coordination numbers of active sites, the intrinsic catalytic activities of single atoms can be significantly enhanced. Xiao et al. prepared novel single-atom catalysts composed of Fe-N5 moieties embedded in the N-doped carbon matrix (Fe-N5/NC) [80]. The resultant Fe-N5/NC exhibited strong adsorption to polysulfides and considerable catalytic effects on the redox conversion of Li-S batteries. Sulfur cathodes with the Fe-N5/NC catalysts displayed a high initial capacity at 0.1 C (1519 mAh g−1). The ΔG calculations implied that the biggest barrier was the Li2S2 reduction.
Co single atoms have been determined to catalyze the redox conversion of sulfur cathodes [81][82]. Wang et al. engineered planar Co-N4 in N-doped graphene mesh. The fabricated single-atom catalysts (SA-Co/NGM) obtained high atom utilization when catalyzing the polysulfide conversion [83]. The authors calculated the ΔG of S8 to Li2S on N-doped carbon (NC) and CoN4 to reveal the improved conversion kinetics.
Heterostructures integrate the advantages of the individual component to achieve increased catalytic effects on sulfur cathodes. For instance, Meng and co-workers developed a CoS2/ZnS heterostructure that can bidirectionally catalyze sulfur cathodes [33].
Zhu et al. synthesized heterogeneous MnO-Mo2C nanoparticles on porous carbon (MnO-Mo2C/C) to host sulfur [84]. MnO-Mo2C decreased the energy barrier of Li2S deposition to 3.38 eV compared to the single MnO (4.63 eV). Similar conclusions were made by Huang et al., who fabricated La2O3-MXene heterostructures to promote the conversion kinetics of sulfur cathodes [85].

5. Lithium-Ion Diffusion Energy Barriers

Lithium-ion diffusion can be used to evaluate the activities of catalysts for Li-S batteries. CV measurements are typically used to determine the lithium-ion diffusion coefficient [86]. In addition, the diffusion energy barriers of lithium ions on the surfaces of catalysts are good indicators to predict the electrochemical kinetics of Li-S batteries. Cui and co-workers investigated the lithium-ion diffusion on graphene and various sulfides using the climbing-image nudged elastic band method [87]. The calculation showed that the diffusion barriers of sulfides were smaller than those of graphene, which was in accordance with the experimental analyses. A smaller barrier increases the diffusion rate, which benefits the reaction kinetics between lithium and sulfur.
Lithium-ion diffusion can be significantly enhanced by controlling the electronic structures of catalysts. For example, Zhang and co-workers calculated the diffusion barriers of lithium ions on MoS2, Mn-doped MoS2, and V-doped MoS2 [54]. Compared with MoS2, the doped MoS2 showed smaller diffusion barriers (MoS2, Mn-doped MoS2, and V-doped MoS2 were 0.08, 0.05, and 0.05 eV), suggesting accelerated lithium-ion migration after the introduction of doped elements. This was advantageous to promoting the rate performance of sulfur cathodes. Sun et al. fabricated P-vacancy CoP (CoP-Vp) to promote the polysulfide conversion [88].
Sun et al. confirmed that incorporating high oxygen contents into the CoP surface accelerated the electrochemical kinetics of polysulfides [89]. The authors calculated the diffusion of lithium ions on CoP with low and high oxygen contents. Lithium ions diffused on CoP with a high oxygen content underwent a decreased barrier of 0.47 eV, meaning a rapid lithium-ion diffusion and accelerated electrochemical conversion of polysulfides. A strain relaxation method has also been reported to tailor the anchoring and catalysis of MoNi4 nanoalloys for Li-S batteries [40]. The calculation results implied that the MoNi4 nanoalloys with superficial 1.59% strain had lower lithium-ion diffusion barriers (2.878 eV) in contrast to MoNi4 (3.143 eV), accelerating the catalytic conversion of sulfur species.
Lithium-ion diffusion barriers can also be used to evaluate the Li deposition/stripping kinetics in Li-S batteries. Lee and co-workers reported that In2Se3 can effectively catalyze Li-S batteries and improve the reversibility of lithium deposition [90]. Acting as a dual-functional additive, In2Se3 was found to simultaneously boost the performance of cathodes and anodes for Li-S batteries. The dissolved In3+ and Se2+ reacted with polysulfides to form LiInS2 and LiInSe2, which were incorporated into the SEI and improved the plating and stripping of lithium. This can be concluded by the lithium-ion diffusion calculations. The previous report showed that the optimum pathway of lithium-ion diffusion on Li2S was along the (100) direction with a low barrier of 0.348 eV. In contrast, the lithium-ion diffusion barriers of LiInS2 and LiInSe2 considerably decreased to 0.286 and 0.269 eV, respectively. The smaller lithium-ion diffusion barriers confirmed more uniform lithium-ion migration through the SEI and rapid kinetics for lithium deposition.

6. Li2S Decomposition Energy Barriers

Because of the insulating nature of Li2S, its dissociation process during charging should overcome huge energy barriers [91]. Therefore, accelerating the catalytic Li2S oxidation benefits sulfur cathodes’ stable capacity and long cycle life. In this case, Zhou et al. proposed the decomposition process of Li2S [87]. An intact Li2S molecule can be decomposed into an individual lithium ion and a LiS cluster as follows:
Li2S → LiS + Li+ + e−.   
The decomposition process involves the dissociation of Li from the Li2S molecule, associated with the Li-S bond cleavage. The calculated decomposition barrier of Li2S can be used to evaluate the activities of catalysts towards Li2S oxidation. By analyzing the decomposition energy profiles of Li2S on various sulfides, the authors indicated that decomposition energy barriers were essentially dependent on the binding ability of the isolated lithium ions with the sulfur of sulfides. Due to the strong binding ability, sulfides caused smaller decomposition barriers than carbon since the binding of lithium ions with carbon was much weaker. This conclusion can explain why sulfides can be good catalysts for Li-S batteries.
Oxides have been investigated to catalyze the electrochemical conversion of Li-S batteries [68]. TiO2 has been confirmed to have favorable chemical adsorption for anchoring polysulfides. However, it is plagued by intrinsically low conductivity, impeding the conversion kinetics of sulfur cathodes. Wei and co-workers developed a high-performance TiO2 catalyst composed of a rich O-vacancy TiO2 anatase/rutile homojunction on carbon nanosheets (A/R-TiO2) [92]. The heterointerface of A/R-TiO2 provided effective anchoring and smooth conversion of polysulfides. It also significantly reduced the Li2S decomposition energy barrier.
Yang et al. designed dual Ni-N4 and Fe-N4 sites co-anchored on carbon nanocages to catalyze sulfur cathodes [74]. The high εd of the Fe-N4 sites demonstrated an accelerated sulfur reduction reaction. Meanwhile, Li2S on the Ni-N4 sites revealed a metallic nature, leading to strong S 2p DOS near the Femi level and thus allowing small Li2S dissociation barriers. The calculation confirmed that the decomposition energy barrier of Li2S on Ni-N4 centers (1.20 eV) was smaller in contrast to that on Fe-N4 (1.35 eV). This behavior originated from the moderate anchoring ability of Li2S on Ni-N4 (−1.63 eV) compared with that on Fe-N4 (−2.65 eV). The moderate adsorption of Li2S typically resulted in favorable decomposition. Song et al. developed dual Zn-Co metal–N/O sites with combined effects on rapid catalytic kinetics for sulfur cathodes [93]. DFT calculations suggested that the Li2S decomposition barriers of this dual-core single-atom catalyst were lower than those of the single-core counterpart.
Other types of catalysts, such as nitrides [94], MXene [95], and heterostructures [96], have been reported to regulate Li2S decomposition. Ma et al. constructed a multibranched vanadium nitride (MB-VN) catalyst towards Li-S batteries with high-/low-temperature tolerance [71]. MB-VN exhibited a small Li2S decomposition barrier of 0.67 eV, implying a rapid Li2S dissociation on MB-VN. Zhang et al. reported hierarchically N-doped porous carbon incorporated F-free Ti3C2Tx for Li-S batteries [95]. Ti coordinated with N presented combined effects on decreasing the Li2S decomposition barriers, hence accelerating the redox kinetics of sulfur cathodes. Tang and co-workers prepared Co-doped P-vacancy FeP catalysts on MXene, which considerably improved the bidirectional Li2S reaction processes [63]. The decomposition energy barriers of Li2S (0.69 eV) on the catalyst were considerably smaller in contrast to those on FeP (1.86 eV). Another MXene-based catalyst designed by Nguyen et al. has also revealed a mitigated energy barrier for Li2S decomposition [56].

References

  1. Armand, M.; Tarascon, J.M. Building better batteries. Nature 2008, 451, 652–657.
  2. Zhu, Z.; Jiang, T.; Ali, M.; Meng, Y.; Jin, Y.; Cui, Y.; Chen, W. Rechargeable batteries for grid scale energy storage. Chem. Rev. 2022, 122, 16610–16751.
  3. Li, M.; Lu, J.; Chen, Z.; Amine, K. 30 years of lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1800561.
  4. Zhao, X.; Ma, L. Recent progress in hydrogen storage alloys for nickel/metal hydride secondary batteries. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34, 4788–4796.
  5. Zhang, Y.; Zhou, C.-G.; Yang, J.; Xue, S.-C.; Gao, H.-L.; Yan, X.-H.; Huo, Q.-Y.; Wang, S.-W.; Cao, Y.; Yan, J.; et al. Advances and challenges in improvement of the electrochemical performance for lead-acid batteries: A comprehensive review. J. Power Sources 2022, 520, 230800.
  6. Zhou, L.; Danilov, D.L.; Eichel, R.A.; Notten, P.H.L. Host materials anchoring polysulfides in Li-S batteries reviewed. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2001304.
  7. Manthiram, A.; Fu, Y.; Chung, S.-H.; Zu, C.; Su, Y.-S. Rechargeable lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 11751–11787.
  8. Seh, Z.W.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Cui, Y. Designing high-energy lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 5605–5634.
  9. Manthiram, A.; Fu, Y.; Su, Y. Challenges and prospects of lithium-sulfur batteries. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 1125–1134.
  10. Zhou, L.; Li, H.; Wu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Danilov, D.L.; Eichel, R.-A.; Notten, P.H.L. Double-shelled Co3O4/C nanocages enabling polysulfides adsorption for high-performance Lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2019, 2, 8153–8162.
  11. Zhou, L.; Danilov, D.L.; Qiao, F.; Eichel, R.-A.; Notten, P.H.L. ZnFe2O4 hollow rods enabling accelerated polysulfide conversion for advanced lithium-sulfur batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2022, 414, 140231.
  12. Dong, H.; Qi, S.; Wang, L.; Chen, X.; Xiao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Sun, B.; Wang, G.; Chen, S. Conductive polymer coated layered double hydroxide as a novel sulfur reservoir for flexible lithium-sulfur batteries. Small 2023, 19, 2300843.
  13. Lin, J.; Mo, Y.; Li, S.; Yu, J. Nitrogen-doped porous carbon fiber/vertical graphene as an efficient polysulfide conversion catalyst for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 690–698.
  14. Gao, N.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, C.; Li, B.; Li, W.; Lu, H.; Yu, L.; Zheng, S.; Wang, B. Low-temperature Li-S battery enabled by CoFe bimetallic catalysts. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 8378–8389.
  15. Zhang, X.; Shen, Z.; Wen, Y.; He, Q.; Yao, J.; Cheng, H.; Gao, T.; Wang, X.; Zhang, H.; Jiao, H. CrP Nanocatalyst within porous mof architecture to accelerate polysulfide conversion in lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 21040–21048.
  16. Ren, L.; Liu, J.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Lu, X.; Zhou, M.; Zhang, G.; Liu, W.; Xu, H.; Sun, X. Regulating electronic structure of Fe-N4 single atomic catalyst via neighboring sulfur doping for high performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2210509.
  17. Zhou, L.; Danilov, D.L.; Qiao, F.; Wang, J.; Li, H.; Eichel, R.A.; Notten, P.H.L. Sulfur reduction reaction in lithium-sulfur batteries: Mechanisms, catalysts, and characterization. Adv. Energy Mater. 2022, 12, 2202094.
  18. Zhou, L.; Li, H.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, M.; Danilov, D.L.; Eichel, R.-A.; Notten, P.H.L. Enhanced sulfur utilization in lithium-sulfur batteries by hybrid modified separators. Mater. Today Comm. 2021, 26, 102133.
  19. Assary, R.S.; Curtiss, L.A.; Moore, J.S. Toward a molecular understanding of energetics in Li-S batteries using nonaqueous electrolytes: A high-level quantum chemical study. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 11545–11558.
  20. Feng, S.; Fu, Z.H.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Q. A review on theoretical models for Lithium-sulfur battery cathodes. InfoMat 2022, 4, e12304.
  21. Shen, J.; Wang, Z.; Xu, X.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, D.; Li, F.; Li, Y.; Zeng, L.; Liu, J. Surface/interface structure and chemistry of lithium-sulfur batteries: From density functional theory calculations’ perspective. Adv. Energy Sustain. Res. 2021, 2, 2100007.
  22. He, Q.; Yu, B.; Li, Z.; Zhao, Y. Density functional theory for battery materials. Energy Environ. Mater. 2019, 2, 264–279.
  23. Han, X.; Xu, X. Indirect modulation of Cu atoms supported on black phosphorus for fast kinetic Li-S batteries: A theoretical study. ACS Mater. Lett. 2023, 5, 2114–2120.
  24. Li, H.; Shi, P.; Wang, L.; Yan, T.; Guo, T.; Xia, X.; Chen, C.; Mao, J.; Sun, D.; Zhang, L. Cooperative catalysis of polysulfides in lithium-sulfur batteries through adsorption competition by tuning cationic geometric configuration of dual-active sites in spinel oxides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e2022162.
  25. Shen, Z.; Cao, M.; Wen, Y.; Li, J.; Zhang, X.; Hui, J.; Zhu, Q.; Zhang, H. Tuning the local coordination of CoP1–xSx between NiAs- and MnP-type structures to catalyze lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Nano 2023, 17, 3143–3152.
  26. Liang, Q.; Wang, S.; Yao, Y.; Dong, P.; Song, H. Transition metal compounds family for Li-S batteries: The DFT-guide for suppressing polysulfides shuttle. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 230082.
  27. Fang, M.; Han, J.; He, S.; Ren, J.-C.; Li, S.; Liu, W. Effective screening descriptor for mxenes to enhance sulfur reduction in lithium-sulfur batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 12601–12608.
  28. Wang, B.; Wang, L.; Kong, Y.; Wang, F.; Jing, Z.; Yang, X.; Qian, Y.; Chen, M.; Xu, L. Hafnium diboride spherical superstructure born of 5d-Metal Hf-MOF-induced p orbital activity of B atom and enhanced kinetics of sulfur cathode reaction. Adv. Energy Mater. 2023, 13, 2300590.
  29. Tahir, M.N.; Mirza, S.H.; Khalid, M.; Ali, A.; Khan, M.U.; Braga, A.A.C. Synthesis, single crystal analysis and DFT based computational studies of 2,4-diamino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-6-ethylpyrim idin-1-ium 3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoate -methanol (DETM). J. Mol. Struct. 2019, 1180, 119–126.
  30. Shafiq, I.; Amanat, I.; Khalid, M.; Asghar, M.A.; Baby, R.; Ahmed, S.; Alshehri, S.M. Influence of azo-based donor modifications on nonlinear optical amplitude of D-π-A based organic chromophores: A DFT/TD-DFT exploration. Synth. Met. 2023, 297, 117410.
  31. Wang, B.; Ren, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Chen, S.; Chang, S.; Zhou, X.; Wang, P.; Sun, H.; Meng, X.; Tang, S. Construction of Co3O4/ZnO Heterojunctions in hollow n-doped carbon nanocages as microreactors for lithium-sulfur full batteries. Adv. Sci. 2023, 10, 2300860.
  32. Wang, L.; Meng, X.; Wang, X.; Zhen, M. Dual-conductive CoSe2@TiSe2-C heterostructures promoting overall sulfur redox kinetics under high sulfur loading and lean electrolyte. Small 2023, 19, 2300089.
  33. Ren, Y.; Ma, Y.; Wang, B.; Chang, S.; Zhai, Q.; Wu, H.; Dai, Y.; Yang, Y.; Tang, S.; Meng, X. Furnishing continuous efficient bidirectional polysulfide conversion for long-life and high-loading lithium-sulfur batteries via the built-in electric field. Small 2023, 19, 2300065.
  34. Schütze, Y.; Gayen, D.; Palczynski, K.; de Oliveira Silva, R.; Lu, Y.; Tovar, M.; Partovi-Azar, P.; Bande, A.; Dzubiella, J. How regiochemistry influences aggregation behavior and charge transport in conjugated organosulfur polymer cathodes for lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Nano 2023, 17, 7889–7900.
  35. Li, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Shen, S.; Wang, S.; Shi, L.; Liu, D.; Fu, Y.; He, D. Multi-perspective synergistic construction of dual-functional heterostructures for high-temperature Li-S batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 468, 143562.
  36. Liu, G.; Zeng, Q.; Tian, S.; Tao, K.; Xie, E.; Zhang, Z. Deciphering the electrocatalysis essence of cobalt diselenide in lithium-sulfur electrochemistry from crystal-phase engineering. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 463, 142416.
  37. Zhou, C.; Hong, M.; Hu, N.; Yang, J.; Zhu, W.; Kong, L.; Li, M. Bi-metallic coupling-induced electronic-state modulation of metal phosphides for kinetics-enhanced and dendrite-free Li-S batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2213310.
  38. Lu, D.; Wang, X.; Hu, Y.; Yue, L.; Shao, Z.; Zhou, W.; Chen, L.; Wang, W.; Li, Y. Expediting stepwise sulfur conversion via spontaneous built-in electric field and binary sulfiphilic effect of conductive NbB2-mxene heterostructure in lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2212689.
  39. Yi, Z.; Su, F.; Dai, L.; Wang, Z.; Xie, L.; Zuo, Z.; Chen, X.; Liu, Y.; Chen, C.-M. Uncovering electrocatalytic conversion mechanisms from Li2S2 to Li2S: Generalization of computational hydrogen electrode. Energy Storage Mater. 2022, 47, 327–335.
  40. Sun, G.W.; Liu, Q.Y.; Zhang, C.Y.; Jin, M.J.; Pan, J.L.; Wang, Y.C.; Hou, X.Y.; Wang, J.T.; Gao, X.P.; Sun, G.Z.; et al. Revealing the enhancement mechanism of carbon-encapsulated surface-strained MoNi4 bimetallic nanoalloys toward high-stability polysulfide conversion with a wide temperature range. Energy Storage Mater. 2023, 60, 102842.
  41. Wan, T.; He, Y.; He, Z.; Han, W.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, G. Integrated host configuration of flexibly fibrous skeleton towards efficient polysulfide conversion and dendrite-free behavior in stable lithium-sulfur pouch cells. J. Energy Chem. 2023, 83, 43–52.
  42. Dong, C.; Zhou, C.; Wu, M.; Yu, Y.; Yu, K.; Yan, K.; Shen, C.; Gu, J.; Yan, M.; Sun, C.; et al. Boosting bi-directional redox of sulfur with dual metal single atom pairs in carbon spheres toward high-rate and long-cycling lithium-sulfur battery. Adv. Energy Mater. 2023, 13, 2301505.
  43. Wang, Y.; Wang, P.; Yuan, J.; Song, N.; An, X.; Ma, X.; Feng, J.; Xi, B.; Xiong, S. Binary sulfiphilic nickel boride on boron-doped graphene with beneficial interfacial charge for accelerated Li-S dynamics. Small 2023, 19, 2208281.
  44. Pang, Q.; Kundu, D.; Nazar, L.F. A graphene-like metallic cathode host for long-life and high-loading Lithium-sulfur batteries. Mater. Horiz. 2016, 3, 130–136.
  45. Zhang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Seh, Z.W.; Fu, Z.; Zhang, R.; Cui, Y. Understanding the anchoring effect of two-dimensional layered materials for lithium-sulfur batteries. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 3780–3786.
  46. Pu, J.; Tan, Y.; Wang, Z.; Fang, Z.; Xue, P.; Yao, Y. Fe3P electrocatalysts assisted carbon based sandwich sulfur cathode “top–bottom” strategy for high rate and high temperature lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 471, 144374.
  47. Wang, F.; Han, Y.; Xu, R.; Li, A.; Feng, X.; Lv, S.; Wang, T.; Song, L.; Li, J.; Wei, Z. Establishing transition metal phosphides as effective sulfur hosts in Lithium-sulfur batteries through the triple effect of “confinement–adsorption–catalysis”. Small 2023, 19, 2303599.
  48. Zhang, X.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Guan, Q.; Wang, J.; Zhuang, Z.; Zhuang, Q.; Cheng, X.; Liu, H.; et al. Accelerated Li+ desolvation for diffusion booster enabling low-temperature sulfur redox kinetics via electrocatalytic carbon-grazfted-CoP porous nanosheets. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2302624.
  49. Zou, K.; Jing, W.; Dai, X.; Chen, X.; Shi, M.; Yao, Z.; Zhu, T.; Sun, J.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Y.; et al. A highly efficient sulfur host enabled by nitrogen/oxygen dual-doped honeycomb-like carbon for advanced lithium-sulfur batteries. Small 2022, 18, 210738.
  50. Peng, L.; Wei, Z.; Wan, C.; Li, J.; Chen, Z.; Zhu, D.; Baumann, D.; Liu, H.; Allen, C.S.; Xu, X.; et al. A fundamental look at electrocatalytic sulfur reduction reaction. Nat. Catal. 2020, 3, 762–770.
  51. Yang, J.; Lee, D.; Yun, W.C.; Kang, D.W.; Kim, Y.; Lee, J.W. Efficient utilization of lithium polysulfides in CO2-derived CNT free-standing electrode of Li-S batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 470, 144337.
  52. Shen, Z.; Jin, X.; Tian, J.; Li, M.; Yuan, Y.; Zhang, S.; Fang, S.; Fan, X.; Xu, W.; Lu, H.; et al. Cation-doped ZnS catalysts for polysulfide conversion in Lithium-sulfur batteries. Nat. Catal. 2022, 5, 555–563.
  53. Hua, W.; Shang, T.; Li, H.; Sun, Y.; Guo, Y.; Xia, J.; Geng, C.; Hu, Z.; Peng, L.; Han, Z.; et al. Optimizing the p charge of S in p-block metal sulfides for sulfur reduction electrocatalysis. Nat. Catal. 2023, 6, 174–184.
  54. Liu, G.; Zeng, Q.; Sui, X.; Tian, S.; Sun, X.; Wu, Q.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Tao, K.; Xie, E.; et al. Modulating d-band electronic structures of molybdenum disulfide via p/n doping to boost polysulfide conversion in lithium-sulfur batteries. Small 2023, 19, 2301085.
  55. Dai, X.; Lv, G.; Wu, Z.; Wang, X.; Liu, Y.; Sun, J.; Wang, Q.; Xiong, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, C.; et al. Flexible hierarchical Co-doped NiS2@CNF-CNT electron deficient interlayer with grass-roots structure for Li-S batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2023, 13, 2300452.
  56. Nguyen, V.P.; Park, J.S.; Shim, H.C.; Yuk, J.M.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, D.; Lee, S.M. Accelerated sulfur evolution reactions by TiS2/TiO2@MXene host for high-volumetric-energy-density lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2303503.
  57. Tian, J.; Shen, Z.; Cheng, H.; Jin, X.; Li, Z.; Wen, Y.; Hui, J.; Guo, S.; Zhang, H.; Zhu, Q. In-depth understanding of catalytic and adsorbing effects in polysulfides conversion and rationally designing coaxial nanofibers for Li-S batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 464, 142541.
  58. Zeng, P.; Zou, H.; Cheng, C.; Wang, L.; Yuan, C.; Liu, G.; Mao, J.; Chan, T.S.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, L. In situ non-topotactic reconstruction-induced synergistic active centers for polysulfide cascade catalysis. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2214770.
  59. Li, F.; Zhang, M.; Chen, W.; Cai, X.; Rao, H.; Chang, J.; Fang, Y.; Zhong, X.; Yang, Y.; Yang, Z.; et al. Vanadium nitride quantum dots/holey graphene matrix boosting adsorption and conversion reaction kinetics for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 30746–30755.
  60. Yang, B.Z.; Xie, P.; Luo, Q.; Li, Z.W.; Zhou, C.Y.; Yin, Y.H.; Liu, X.B.; Li, Y.S.; Wu, Z.P. Binder-free ω-Li3V2O5 catalytic network with multi-polarization centers assists lithium-sulfur batteries for enhanced kinetics behavior. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2110665.
  61. Zhou, C.; Li, M.; Hong, M.; Hu, N.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y. Laser-induced micro-explosion to construct hierarchical structure as efficient polysulfide mediators for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 421, 129707.
  62. Nørskov, J.K.; Rossmeisl, J.; Logadottir, A.; Lindqvist, L.; Kitchin, J.R.; Bligaard, T.; Jónsson, H. Origin of the overpotential for oxygen reduction at a fuel-cell cathode. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 17886–17892.
  63. Zhou, X.; Cui, Y.; Huang, X.; Wu, X.; Sun, H.; Tang, S. Dual-defect engineering of bidirectional catalyst for high-performing lithium-sulfur batteries. Small 2023, 19, 2301545.
  64. Du, Z.; Chen, X.; Hu, W.; Chuang, C.; Xie, S.; Hu, A.; Yan, W.; Kong, X.; Wu, X.; Ji, H.; et al. Cobalt in nitrogen-doped graphene as single-atom catalyst for high-sulphur content lithium-sulphur batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 3977–3985.
  65. Zhang, Y.; Kang, C.; Zhao, W.; Song, Y.; Zhu, J.; Huo, H.; Ma, Y.; Du, C.; Zuo, P.; Lou, S.; et al. d-p Hybridization-induced “trapping-coupling-conversion” enables high-efficiency nb single-atom catalysis for Li-S batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 1728–1739.
  66. Bai, Z.; Wang, Z.; Li, R.; Wu, Z.; Feng, P.; Zhao, L.; Wang, T.; Hou, W.; Bai, Y.; Wang, G.; et al. Engineering triple-phase interfaces enabled by layered double perovskite oxide for boosting polysulfide redox conversion. Nano Lett. 2023, 23, 4908–4915.
  67. Chu, R.; Nguyen, T.T.; Song, H.; P, M.A.; Bai, Y.; Kim, D.H.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, N.H. Crystal transformation engineering for effective polysulfides blocking layer for excellent energy density lithium-sulfur batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2023, 61, 102877.
  68. Li, Y.; Liu, J.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X.; Chen, N.; Qian, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Chen, Z. CoFe2O4@rGO as a separator coating for advanced lithium-sulfur batteries. Small. Sci. 2023, 3, 300045.
  69. Cheng, H.; Shen, Z.; Liu, W.; Luo, M.; Huo, F.; Hui, J.; Zhu, Q.; Zhang, H. Vanadium intercalation into niobium disulfide to enhance the catalytic activity for Lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Nano 2023, 17, 14695–14705.
  70. Ma, F.; Chen, Z.; Srinivas, K.; Liu, D.; Zhang, Z.; Wu, Y.; Zhu, M.-Q.; Wu, Q.; Chen, Y. VN quantum dots anchored N-doped carbon nanosheets as bifunctional interlayer for high-performance lithium-metal and lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 459, 141526.
  71. Ma, L.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wang, J.; Cheng, Y.; Wu, J.; Peng, B.; Xu, J.; Zhang, W.; Jin, Z. Wide-temperature operation of Lithium-sulfur batteries enabled by multi-branched vanadium nitride electrocatalyst. ACS Nano 2023, 17, 11527–11536.
  72. Gao, Y.-T.; Wang, X.-Y.; Cai, D.-Q.; Zhou, S.-Y.; Zhao, S.-X. Enhanced polysulfide trapping and conversion by amorphous–crystalline heterostructured MnO2 interlayers for Li-S batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 30152–30160.
  73. Huang, C.; Yu, J.; Li, C.; Cui, Z.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, C.; Nan, B.; Li, J.; Arbiol, J.; Cabot, A. Combined defect and heterojunction engineering in ZnTe/CoTe2@NC sulfur hosts toward robust Lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 2305624.
  74. Yang, J.-L.; Yang, P.; Cai, D.-Q.; Wang, Z.; Fan, H.J. Atomically dispersed Fe–N4 and Ni–N4 independent sites enable bidirectional sulfur redox electrocatalysis. Nano Lett. 2023, 23, 4000–4007.
  75. Liu, X.; He, Q.; Liu, J.; Yu, R.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Xu, X.; Mai, L.; Zhou, L. Dual single-atom moieties anchored on n-doped multilayer graphene as a catalytic host for lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 9439–9446.
  76. Zhang, S.; Ao, X.; Huang, J.; Wei, B.; Zhai, Y.; Zhai, D.; Deng, W.; Su, C.; Wang, D.; Li, Y. Isolated single-atom Ni-N5 catalytic site in hollow porous carbon capsules for efficient lithium-sulfur batteries. Nano Lett. 2021, 21, 9691–9698.
  77. Gu, H.; Yue, W.; Hu, J.; Niu, X.; Tang, H.; Qin, F.; Li, Y.; Yan, Q.; Liu, X.; Xu, W.; et al. Asymmetrically coordinated Cu-N1C2 single-atom catalyst immobilized on Ti3C2Tx MXene as separator coating for lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2023, 13, 2204014.
  78. Wang, S.; Hu, R.; Yuan, D.; Zhang, L.; Wu, C.; Ma, T.; Yan, W.; Wang, R.; Liu, L.; Jiang, X.; et al. Single-atomic tungsten-doped Co3O4 nanosheets for enhanced electrochemical kinetics in lithium-sulfur batteries. Carbon Energy 2023, 5, e329.
  79. Zhang, F.; Tang, Z.; Zheng, L.; Zhang, T.; Xu, M.; Xiao, H.; Zhuang, H.; Han, P.; Gao, Q. Edge-distributed iron single-atom moiety with efficient “trapping-conversion” for polysulfides driving high-performance of Li-S battery. Appl. Catal. B 2023, 334, 122876.
  80. Xiao, H.; Li, K.; Zhang, T.; Liang, X.; Zhang, F.; Zhuang, H.; Zheng, L.; Gao, Q. High loading atomically distributed Fe asymmetrically coordinated with pyridinic and pyrrolic N on porous N-rich carbon matrix driving high performance of Li-S battery. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 471, 144553.
  81. Fang, D.; Sun, P.; Huang, S.; Shang, Y.; Li, X.; Yan, D.; Lim, Y.V.; Su, C.-Y.; Su, B.-J.; Juang, J.-Y.; et al. An exfoliation–evaporation strategy to regulate N coordination number of Co single-atom catalysts for high-performance Lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Mater. Lett. 2022, 4, 1–10.
  82. Huang, T.; Sun, Y.; Wu, J.; Jin, J.; Wei, C.; Shi, Z.; Wang, M.; Cai, J.; An, X.T.; Wang, P.; et al. A dual-functional fibrous skeleton implanted with single-atomic Co-Nx dispersions for longevous Li-S full batteries. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 14105–14115.
  83. Wang, D.; Ma, K.; Hao, J.; Zhang, W.; Shi, H.; Wang, C.; Xiong, Z.; Bai, Z.; Chen, F.-R.; Guo, J.; et al. Engineering single-atom catalysts as multifunctional polysulfide and lithium regulators toward kinetically accelerated and durable lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 466, 143182.
  84. Zhu, J.; Dong, X.; Zeng, Q.; Liang, F.; Ning, S.; Wang, G.; Shen, P.K.; Ma, S. MnO-Mo2C heterogeneous particles supported on porous carbon: Accelerating the catalytic conversion of polysulfides. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 460, 141811.
  85. Huang, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Kong, Y.; Wang, Z.; He, K.; Qin, J.; Zhang, Q.; Su, C.; Zhong, Y.L.; Chen, H. Efficient synergism of chemisorption and wackenroder reaction via heterostructured La2O3-Ti3C2Tx-embedded carbon nanofiber for high-energy lithium-sulfur pouch cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2303422.
  86. Huang, X.; Wang, Z.; Knibbe, R.; Luo, B.; Ahad, S.A.; Sun, D.; Wang, L. Cyclic voltammetry in lithium-sulfur batteries-challenges and opportunities. Energy Technol. 2019, 7, 1801001.
  87. Zhou, G.; Tian, H.; Jin, Y.; Tao, X.; Liu, B.; Zhang, R.; Seh, Z.W.; Zhuo, D.; Liu, Y.; Sun, J.; et al. Catalytic oxidation of Li2S on the surface of metal sulfides for Li-S batteries. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 840–845.
  88. Sun, R.; Bai, Y.; Bai, Z.; Peng, L.; Luo, M.; Qu, M.; Gao, Y.; Wang, Z.; Sun, W.; Sun, K. Phosphorus vacancies as effective polysulfide promoter for high-energy-density lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2022, 12, 2102739.
  89. Sun, R.; Qu, M.; Peng, L.; Yang, W.; Wang, Z.; Bai, Y.; Sun, K. Regulating electrochemical kinetics of CoP by incorporating oxygen on surface for high-performance Li-S batteries. Small 2023, 19, 2302092.
  90. Zhao, Y.; Huang, L.; Zhao, D.; Yang Lee, J. Fast polysulfide conversion catalysis and reversible anode operation by a single cathode modifier in Li-metal anode-free lithium-sulfur batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e2023089.
  91. Yang, Y.; Zheng, G.; Misra, S.; Nelson, J.; Toney, M.F.; Cui, Y. High-capacity micrometer-sized Li2S particles as cathode materials for advanced rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 15387–15394.
  92. Ma, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Wang, L.; Zhang, C.; Chen, Y.; Wu, Q.; Chen, L.; Zhou, L.; Wei, W. Integrating energy band alignment and oxygen vacancies engineering of TiO2 anatase/rutile homojunction for kinetics-enhanced Li-S batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 2305788.
  93. Song, C.-L.; He, Q.-T.; Zeng, Z.; Chen, J.-Y.; Wen, T.; Huang, Y.-X.; Zhuang, L.-C.; Yi, W.; Cai, Y.-P.; Hong, X.-J. Isolated diatomic Zn-Co metal–nitrogen/oxygen sites with synergistic effect on fast catalytic kinetics of sulfur species in Li-S battery. J. Energy Chem. 2023, 79, 505–514.
  94. Zhang, W.; Xu, B.; Zhang, L.; Li, W.; Li, S.; Zhang, J.; Jiang, G.; Cui, Z.; Song, H.; Grundish, N.; et al. Co4N-Decorated 3D wood-derived carbon host enables enhanced cathodic electrocatalysis and homogeneous lithium deposition for lithium-sulfur full cells. Small 2022, 18, 2105664.
  95. Zhang, X.; Ni, Z.; Bai, X.; Shen, H.; Wang, Z.; Wei, C.; Tian, K.; Xi, B.; Xiong, S.; Feng, J. Hierarchical porous N-doped carbon encapsulated fluorine-free MXene with tunable coordination chemistry by one-pot etching strategy for lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2023, 13, 2301349.
  96. Yang, D.; Liang, Z.; Zhang, C.; Biendicho, J.J.; Botifoll, M.; Spadaro, M.C.; Chen, Q.; Li, M.; Ramon, A.; Moghaddam, A.O.; et al. NbSe2 Meets C2N: A 2D-2D heterostructure catalysts as multifunctional polysulfide mediator in ultra-long-life lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2101250.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Electrochemistry
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Xue-Ting Fang
,
Lei Zhou
,
Chunguang Chen
,
Dmitri L. Danilov
,
Fen Qiao
,
Haitao Li
,
Peter H. L. Notten
View Times: 134
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 01 Nov 2023
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Video Production Service
    Feedback