Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Bikesh Kumar Nirala
 -- 6112 2023-10-31 11:36:54 |
2 format correct
Catherine Yang
 Meta information modification 6112 2023-11-01 01:50:53 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Nirala, B.K.; Yamamichi, T.; Petrescu, D.I.; Shafin, T.N.; Yustein, J.T. The Tumor Microenvironment of Osteosarcoma. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/50980 (accessed on 01 August 2024).
Nirala BK, Yamamichi T, Petrescu DI, Shafin TN, Yustein JT. The Tumor Microenvironment of Osteosarcoma. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/50980. Accessed August 01, 2024.
Nirala, Bikesh K., Taku Yamamichi, D. Isabel Petrescu, Tasnuva N. Shafin, Jason T. Yustein. "The Tumor Microenvironment of Osteosarcoma" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/50980 (accessed August 01, 2024).
Nirala, B.K., Yamamichi, T., Petrescu, D.I., Shafin, T.N., & Yustein, J.T. (2023, October 31). The Tumor Microenvironment of Osteosarcoma. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/50980
Nirala, Bikesh K., et al. "The Tumor Microenvironment of Osteosarcoma." Encyclopedia. Web. 31 October, 2023.
The Tumor Microenvironment of Osteosarcoma
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/cancers15205108

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common bone tumor in the pediatric population. Currently, no effective molecularly targeted therapies are available for OS. The OS tumor grows in a very complex and dynamic bone microenvironment consisting of cellular and noncellular components, including bone cells (osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and osteocytes), stromal cells (mesenchymal stem cells and fibroblasts), vascular cells (endothelial cells and pericytes), immune cells (myeloid and lymphoid cells), and mineralized extracellular matrix (ECM). Myeloid cells are the most abundant cell type in the tumor microenvironment (TME) of OS. A single-cell analysis showed multiple ligand–receptor interactions between OS tumor, myeloid, and osteoblast cells, including 21 ligand–receptor gene pairs that are significantly associated with survival outcomes. The TME not only provides favorable conditions for tumor cell growth but also releases a range of elements, including various cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors, that can promote the metastasis of tumor cells to other tissues and organs. 

osteosarcoma tumor microenvironment therapeutic strategies immune cells

1. Bone Cells

Three different bone cells contribute to OS’s bone homeostasis: osteoblast cells, osteoclast cells, and osteocytes. Osteoblast cells are bone-forming, whereas osteoclast cells are bone-resorbing, and osteocytes are mature bone cells.

1.1. Osteoblast Cells

Osteoblasts (OBs) are bone-forming cells originating from the pluripotent mesenchymal stem cells. Specific cytokines promote osteoblastogenesis, including interferon-γ (IFN-γ), interleukin-10 (IL-10), IL-11, IL-18, cardiotrophin-1, and oncostatin M. In contrast, IL-4, IL-7, IL-12, IL-13, IL-23, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), TNF-β, IL-1α, IFN-α, and IFN-β obstruct it [1]. The expression of Runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2) is essential for OB differentiation and is upregulated in the committed mesenchymal stem cells and the pro-osteoblasts. RUNX2 regulates FGFR2 and FGFR3, which are necessary for the proliferation of osteoblast progenitors. In addition, RUNX2 governs Hedgehog, Wnt, and Pthlh (Pthr1) signaling pathway genes, which induce pro-osteoblasts to commit to the osteoblast lineage [2][3]. Recently, it has been found that Krüppel-like factor 2 (KLF2), a zinc-finger DNA-binding transcription factor, regulates osteogenic differentiation and bone mineralization mediated through RUNX2 [4][5].
OBs can affect the formation, differentiation, or apoptosis of osteoclasts (OCs) through several pathways, including the OPG/RANKL/RANK, RANKL/LGR4/RANK, Ephrin2/ephB4, and Fas/FasL pathways [6]. OBs communicate with OS through OB-derived extracellular vesicles (OB-EVs) to regulate the TME of OS [7].

1.2. Osteoclast Cells

The OCs are specialized cells responsible for bone resorption that originate from myeloid precursor cells [8]. OCs communicate closely with osteoblasts and osteocytes under normal physiological conditions and play a vital role in maintaining bone homeostasis [9][10]. Under pathological conditions, OCs play an active role in OS tumorigenesis and metastasis [11]. The cytokines colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF1) and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL) are essential and sufficient for the differentiation and activation of OCs [12][13][14]. The cytokine CSF1 is involved in the proliferation and survival of pre-osteoclast (POC) cells. RANKL drives the differentiation of OC precursor cells into mature OCs by controlling gene expression through the activation of its receptor, RANK [15]. OS cells regulate OC migration, resorption, and osteoclastogenesis by secreting EVs, which is mediated through the regulation of the PTEN/PI3K/AKT pathway, miR-19a-3p, and the cytokines CSF1 and RANKL [16][17].
The role of OCs in OS tumor progression and metastasis is still an active area of investigation. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining and mRNA expression of TRACP5, an OC cell surface marker, were relatively low in OS patient samples compared to healthy controls, which suggests a negative correlation between OS development and a high OC population. Additionally, higher OC-retained patients exhibit better chemotherapy efficacy compared to patients with a low population of OCs in the TME of OS [18]. However, the underlying mechanism of the inhibition of generation and maturation of OCs by chemoresistant malignant tumors remains to be explored. Compared to primary osteoblastic OS lesions, lower OC infiltration is observed in chondroblastic, recurrent, and lung metastatic samples of OS lesions [19]. Li et al. found that OCs can function like antigen-presenting cells (APCs), similar to dendritic cells, to activate CD4+ and CD8+ T cells [20].
Interestingly, OCs can exhibit antitumor activity, while several reports have also demonstrated their tumor-promoting functions. Li et al. revealed that cell–cell communication between OCs and CD4+ Tregs alters the TME of OS, which is associated with a poor prognosis [21]. In one study, zoledronic acid (ZA) treatment enhanced the antitumor effect of cisplatin on OS by targeting the ROS-PI3K/AKT signaling pathways, which suggests a possibility for combining ZA with other chemotherapeutic reagents, such as cisplatin, as a target against OS [22]. However, contrary results were reported in several clinical studies where the loss of OCs using ZA showed more highly metastatic disease than in the control group. In contrast, enhancing the OC population using fulvestrant treatment reduces metastatic lesions [23][24]. It is hypothesized that the role of OCs varies depending on the stage of OS progression. In the primary tumor, OCs may provide a niche within the bone that nurtures the OS cells and suppresses metastasis. In the later stages, loss of OCs may favor metastatic spread [25]. More extensive studies are needed to understand the pathophysiological role of OCs in OS progression and metastasis before using OCs as a therapeutic target for OS patients.

1.3. Osteocytes

Osteocytes are mature, mineralized bone cells that are derived from osteoblast cells. They are the most abundant cell type in bone, with an estimated half-life of 25 years. Previously, osteocytes were believed to be passive cells. However, multifunctional roles have recently been reported, including coordinating bone formation and reabsorption, sensing the mechanical force in bone, etc. Osteocytes communicate with OS cells by secreting several soluble factors, including GDF15, TGFβ, CXCL1/2, and VEGFA, as well as through physical interactions (e.g., NOTCH3 signaling). Osteocytes also produce RANKL, CSF1, HMGB1, and IL-11 to stimulate osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption [26]. Osteocytes activate the CXCL12-CXCR4 signaling axis in OS by producing CXCL12, favoring tumor metastasis. Although osteocytes can potentially establish bone metastasis and homing to specific areas of the bone, further research is required to determine osteocytes’ particular contribution to the relocation and homing of cancer cells to bone.

2. Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and osteoblast cells are considered potential precursors of OS cells [27]. Studies have shown that MSCs act as sensors between OS tumor cells and the TME by releasing several cytokines, chemokines, interleukins, and EVs. MSCs actively participate in paracrine signaling with OS tumor cells, impacting diverse aspects of tumor behavior, including angiogenesis, proliferation, invasion, metastasis, immune modulation, and chemotherapeutic resistance [27]. MSCs promote OS growth, metastasis, and angiogenesis by secreting various chemokines, including chemokine ligand 5 (CCL5), stromal-derived factor 1 (SDF-1), CXCL12, IL-6, and VEGF [27]. The EVs released by both OS cells and MSCs mediate intercellular communication by transporting miRNAs/RNAs and proteins. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles (BMSC-EVs) promote OS cell proliferation, invasion, and migration via the MALAT1/miR-143/NRSN2/Wnt/β-catenin axis and miR-655-mediated β-catenin signaling [28][29]. A cytokine-like hormone, leptin, highly expressed in MSCs, shapes the OS TME by enhancing autophagy, promoting chemoresistance and OS cell survival, mediated through TGF-β upregulation [30]. Additionally, BMSC-derived exosomes have been implicated in promoting OS tumorigenesis and metastasis by inducing autophagy [31]. Although MSCs have the potential for therapeutic interventions, such as bone regeneration and engineered protein delivery, there is continued debate about their precise role in OS development, owing to complexities in differentiating MSCs from osteoblasts and understanding their dual role [32]. Utilizing the potential of MSCs, engineered extracellular microvesicles encapsulating chemotherapeutic drugs, including doxorubicin, have emerged as a promising nanocarrier for targeted OS therapy, exhibiting superior specificity, biocompatibility, and reduced toxicity [33]. Furthermore, exosomal microRNAs from bone marrow-derived MSCs contribute to a dual role in OS, with miR-208a and miR-21-5p promoting proliferation, migration, and invasion [34][35]. Concurrently, miR-206 inhibits OS progression by targeting TRA2B, highlighting potential therapeutic avenues [36].

3. The Immune Landscape of OS

3.1. Lymphoid Cells

Lymphoid cells originate from hemopoietic stem cells. There are three major types of lymphocytes: B lymphocytes or B cells, T lymphocytes or T cells, and natural killer cells (NK cells). B cells develop in the bone marrow and are responsible for antibody production. T cells mature in the thymus and have cell surface receptors to recognize antigens bound to the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). NK cells arise from bone marrow; are stimulated by specific cytokines, including interferon-gamma; and recognize and attack “non-self” cells, including cancer cells. Lymphoid cells play an essential role in OS tumorigenesis and metastasis.

T Cells

T cells are essential for both cellular and humoral immunity. Their infiltration of the TME plays a critical role in antitumor immunity in several tumor types, including OS [37][38][39]. Heterogeneous T cell subsets in the TME of OS have distinct functions: cytotoxic T cells (CD8+) directly attack cancer cells, whereas helper T cells (CD4+) orchestrate the immune response, and regulatory T cells (Tregs) suppress the immune response, promoting tumor growth [40]. Recent studies have shown a complex interplay between tumor cells and T cells in the TME of OS. Wu et al. conducted a comprehensive analysis, revealing a complex immune landscape in OS with diverse immune cell infiltration and checkpoint expression [41]. Liu et al. discovered an immune evasion mechanism where the OS cells express PD-L1 and block T cell function, evading immune surveillance [38].
The TME of OS not only influences T cell function and immunosuppression but can also impact T cell trafficking and infiltration. Factors such as chemokines, adhesion molecules, and the extracellular matrix can regulate T cell migration into the TME [37][39]. The chemokine CXCL12 and its receptor CXCR4 have been implicated in T cell trafficking in OS [37]. Therefore, strategies to enhance T-cell infiltration could potentially improve the efficacy of T cell-based therapies [42]. However, the effectiveness of T cell-based therapies in OS is often limited by the immunosuppressive TME, especially by the infiltration of Tregs and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) [39][41]. Therefore, strategies to modulate the TME and enhance T cell function are crucial for improving the efficacy of T cell-based therapies in OS.

B Cells

B cells are vital to adaptive immunity and significantly impact the OS TME by producing antibodies, presenting antigens, and secreting cytokines. Most of the literature suggests that B cells promote tumor progression; however, recent investigations have demonstrated the close association of B cells with the prognosis of OS patients and the response to immunotherapy [43][44]. Recently, Petitprez et al. reported that B cells were the most decisive prognostic factor in improved survival and a high response rate to PD1 blockade in a phase 2 clinical trial of soft-tissue sarcoma [45][46]. On the contrary, Kendal et al. explored the dual role of B cells in cancer progression, highlighting their capacity to either promote tumor growth by secreting immunosuppressive cytokines and promoting regulatory T cell formation or to inhibit tumor growth through antigen presentation and antibody production [47]. Moreover, the function of B cells in OS is closely related to the presence and function of other immune cells. Circulating follicular helper T cell (Tfh) abnormality leads to altered B cell maturation and differentiation that is displayed in OS patients. The Tfh cells are crucial for B cell maturation and antibody production [48]. This study suggested that the interaction between Tfh cells and B cells could be a potential therapeutic target in OS. Wang et al. investigated the effect of miR-138 on the function of Tfh cells and the differentiation of B cells in OS [49]. This study found that miR-138 could regulate the function of Tfh cells, thereby affecting the differentiation of B cells. This finding further underscores the intricate relationship between B cells and other immune cells in the context of OS [50]. Furthermore, Bod et al. discussed the role of B cell-specific checkpoint molecules in regulating antitumor immunity [51]. They found that certain checkpoint molecules expressed on B cells can inhibit B cell function and promote tumor growth. Therefore, targeting these checkpoint molecules could enhance the antitumor activity of B cells. Recent research underscores B cells’ complex role in OS. Zhang et al. used single-cell RNA sequencing to investigate the effect of B cells on the prognosis and immune cell infiltration of OS. Two of the B cell marker genes in OS, RPL37A and MEF2C, were associated with a poor prognosis, while the marker genes PLD3 and SNX2 were associated with a good prognosis [52].
B cells influence disease progression, interact with other immune cells, and hold promise as prognostic markers. Further research is needed to understand the significance of their role in OS progression and the development of novel therapeutic strategies.

NK Cells

Natural killer (NK) cells, critical components of the innate immune system, play a vital role in the immune response against OS by recognizing and eliminating malignant cells without prior sensitization [53][54][55]. NK cells are characterized by their cytotoxic activity and the production of cytokines, such as interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), which can modulate the TME and enhance antitumor responses. However, the TME of OS is complex and can influence the function and efficacy of NK cells [56][57]. A study by Liu et al. revealed a novel immune evasion mechanism in OS at the single-cell level, noting that the TME of OS is characterized by a high degree of heterogeneity, with NK cells comprising a considerable proportion of immune cells in the TME. Despite their high presence, NK cells in the TME of OS often exhibit functional exhaustion, characterized by decreased cytotoxic activity and cytokine production [38]. This exhaustion can be attributed to various factors, such as dysregulated NK cell receptor signaling, the immunosuppressive effect of regulatory cells in the TME, the interaction with other immune cells, the expression of immune checkpoint molecules, and soluble factors in the microenvironment [38][39][40][58].
Recent studies have highlighted the potential of NK cell-based immunotherapies in OS. For instance, Rademacher et al. demonstrated that overexpression of interleukin-12 (IL-12) in sarcoma cells can enhance NK cell immunomodulation, leading to increased cytotoxicity against tumor cells [59]. Similarly, Omer et al. emphasized the potential of NK cell targeting in pediatric sarcoma, suggesting that enhancing NK cell function could improve therapeutic outcomes [60]. Moreover, Chu et al. showed that the combination of N-803 (an IL-15 superagonist) and dinutuximab (an anti-GD2 antibody) with ex vivo expanded NK cells significantly enhances in vitro cytotoxicity against GD2+ pediatric solid tumors and improves the survival of xenografted immunodeficient NSG mice [61]. This suggests that strategies aimed at improving the function and survival of NK cells could be beneficial in OS treatment. Another promising approach is the inhibition of TIGIT, an immune checkpoint molecule expressed in NK cells. Judge et al. showed that the combination of IL-15 stimulation and TIGIT blockade significantly enhances the antitumor activity of NK cells in soft-tissue sarcomas [62]. Furthermore, a study by Lu et al. revealed that panobinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, can enhance NK cell cytotoxicity in soft-tissue sarcomas, suggesting its potential use in combination with NK cell-based immunotherapies [63].
Although NK cells hold great promise for future OS treatment, several challenges, including the heterogeneity of the OS TME, the immunosuppressive mechanisms employed by the tumor, and the potential toxicity of NK cell-based therapies, need to be carefully considered when designing future therapeutic strategies.

3.2. Myeloid Cells

Myeloid cells derive from hematopoietic stem cells in the bone marrow [64], which include granulocytes, monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells (DCs) [65]. Myeloid cells in OS have various roles for tumor development and metastasis, depending on the cell type. Such roles include phagocytosis, inflammation, migration, or the adaptive immune system’s activation of a T cell response [66].

Monocytes

Monocytes are antigen-presenting cells (APCs) that can communicate between the innate and adaptive immune systems. This cell type can differentiate into macrophages or dendritic cells [66]. Monocytes are one of the cell types that produce the chemokine monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), which is associated with tumor cell growth, migration, invasion, and metastasis in several types of cancer. In vitro studies revealed a strong correlation between MCP-1 production and cell migration in OS [67]. Monocytes expressing the CCR2 receptor are recruited to sites of metastases by the chemoattractant cytokine CCL2, suggesting that this interaction can provide a mechanism for the targeted treatment of pulmonary metastasis. Losartan is an angiotensin II type I receptor (AT1R) antagonist found to inhibit CCR2 signaling, resulting in reduced monocyte recruitment [68]. In canine models of lung metastatic OS, combined treatment with high-dose losartan and the tumor-targeted multikinase inhibitor toceranib effectively reduced advanced lung metastases in 50% of the dogs receiving treatment [69]. Furthermore, patrolling monocytes (PMOs) are a monocyte subtype exhibiting antitumor activity in OS. PMOs are enriched in the pulmonary microvasculature and have been shown to prevent cancer cell migration and promote the recruitment and activation of natural killer cells [70].

Macrophages

Macrophages are some of the most abundant immune cells in the TME of OS and play multifunctional roles in tissue homeostasis, host defense, tissue repair, and apoptosis by releasing various growth factors, cytokines, chemokines, and enzymes [71][72]. The role of macrophages in OS tumor progression shows contrasting results depending on their polarization. These highly plastic cells can be influenced by external stimuli and their surrounding environment and polarize into M1- or M2-like macrophages. M1-like macrophages participate in anticancer adaptive immunity, whereas M2-like macrophages promote the immune-suppressive TME. Macrophages play an essential role in inhibiting the initiation and development of OS. Reorienting and polarizing tumor-associated macrophages toward M1-like macrophages is the holy grail of macrophage-mediated cancer therapy [73][74]. Due to their plasticity and heterogeneity, tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) have shown both pro- and antitumor activity according to the tumor type and the interactions between TAMs and other cell types in the TME [75][76]. Emerging studies have found that TAMs can mediate immunosuppression via interaction with various immune effector cells. It is reported that TAMs express the ligand PD-1 and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4), inhibiting T cell activation. Studies have found that TAMs can also be involved in the recruitment of Treg cells into tumor tissues and in establishing pre-metastatic niches to the distal organs [77][78]. TAMs are also involved in the secretion of various pro-angiogenic factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), and matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP-9), associated with tumor angiogenesis [79]. Before using TAMs as a therapeutic target, further study on the roles of macrophages in OS progression and metastasis must be accomplished. Macrophages are grouped into two major categories: the subtype that releases proinflammatory cytokines that lead to antimicrobial or antitumor activity is called the M1-macrophage. The other macrophage subtype that releases anti-inflammatory cytokines and supports tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis is called the M2-macrophage [66].
  • M1-Macrophages
M1 macrophages produce inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and express cytokines that induce the development of type-1 helper T cells [80]. These proinflammatory cytokines include interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) [81]. Once activated, these macrophages secrete chemokines that target proliferating tumor cells [82]. M1 macrophage-related genes can be biomarkers to assess high- and low-risk groups for individuals with OS. These genes are CD37, GABRD, and ARHGAP25, with roles in tumorigenesis and disease progression [81].
  • M2-Macrophages
M2 macrophages are involved in immune suppression, tissue remodeling, tumor progression, and angiogenesis [80]. M2 macrophages facilitate OS metastasis by secreting CCL18, MMP-12, cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2), and IL-1β [83][84][85]. T cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain (Tim) family of protein, Tim-3, was found to promote M2 macrophage polarization, leading to invasion and metastasis of OS cells [86]. Han et al. identified that IL-1β secreted by M2 macrophages contributes to OS metastasis, mediated through the NF-κB/miR-181α-5p/RASSF1A/Wnt pathway [87]. Aberrant methylation at the promoter of RASSF1A, or Ras association domain family 1A, contributes to the pathogenesis of several types of pediatric tumors, including OS. A potential therapeutic method to minimize M2 macrophage polarization is treatment with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA). ATRA can directly inhibit M2 macrophage polarization to delay OS initiation by inhibiting colony and osteosphere formation [88]. Since the repolarization of M2-like macrophages to M1-like macrophages could be achieved with various strategies, this is emerging as an innovative anticancer approach [82]. When M2 macrophages are treated with the terpenoid compound asiaticoside (ATS), the expression of M2 macrophage markers is reduced, with no change in the expression of M1 markers, suggesting that treatment with ATS can repolarize M2 macrophages to M1 macrophages [89]. Alternatively, graphene oxide (GO), used for photothermal therapy (PTT), and mifamurtide, a synthetic analog of the cell wall in bacteria, have been shown to repolarize macrophages and suppress the progression of OS [82].

Dendritic Cells

Dendritic cells (DCs) act as professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs) that contribute to antigen-specific adaptive immunity with a role in T-cell priming, activation, and differentiation [90]. Depending on their origin, four distinct subclusters of DCs have been identified in OS lesions: monocyte-derived CD14+CD163+ DCs, the conventional myeloid-derived CD1+ DCs (cDC2s), CD141+CLEC9A+ DCs (cDC1s), and the activated CCR7+ DCs [19]. DCs produce interferon type 1α (IFN-1α) and IFN-1β, which are associated with antitumor and antiviral response [91]. Kawano et al. revealed that a murine OS model treated with doxorubicin and DCs exhibited increased levels of immunological cell death and expression of calreticulin (CRT), heat shock promoter 70 (HSP70), and high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), which are involved in the systemic immune response. In addition, combined treatment resulted in increased cytotoxic T cells within metastases, inhibiting metastatic growth [92]. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data showed that a cluster of regulatory DCs might shape the immunosuppressive microenvironment in OS by recruiting regulatory T cells [38]. Similarly, murine models of metastatic OS that were treated with DCs exposed to cryo-treated tumor lysates and injected with anti-transforming growth factor-β (anti-TGF-β) antibody demonstrated reduced metastatic tumor volume, decreased regulatory T cells, and an increase in cytotoxic T cells [93]. As another potential therapeutic target, the transcription factor recombination signal binding protein for immunoglobulin kappa J region (RBP-J) is crucial for regulating DC synthesis and is involved in DC-dependent antitumor immune responses. Furthermore, when photodynamic therapy (PDT) is used as a treatment for OS, this improves the function of DCs for antigen processing and presentation to activate T cell-mediated immunity by upregulating HSP70 [94]. These studies provide meaningful insights into the regulatory pathways contributing to the antitumor response of DCs in OS. OS tumors treated with DCs combined with anti-glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor (GITR) antibodies produce reduced levels of immunosuppressive cytokines and show antitumor effects. Moreover, a single-cell RNAseq study showed that a high infiltration of resting DCs in OS tumors was associated with poor prognosis [95].

Neutrophils

Tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) are strongly correlated with tumor progression and metastasis in OS. TANs have been found to infiltrate primary OS as well as metastatic and recurrent OS [96]. Tokgöz et al. revealed that the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in the peripheral blood of OS patients provides diagnostic and prognostic value, with a high NLR being associated with poor prognosis. Conversely, a low NLR indicates a better response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and a higher pathological complete response rate [97]. Minimizing the presence of TANs in the TME of OS to reduce tumor progression and metastatic potential offers a promising therapeutic strategy.

MDSCs

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are immature myeloid cells that are pivotal in tumor-associated immune suppression by differentiating into tumor-associated DCs, TAMs, and TANs [98]. MDSCs can suppress the innate and acquired immune system by suppressing T cells, NK cells, and dendritic cell functions while activating FoxP3+ Treg cells [99]. The cytokine IL-17 could be involved in the immune-suppressive function of MDSCs on T cells through the upregulation of ARG-1, MMP-9, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), and COX-2 [100]. MDSCs interact closely with T lymphocytes and prevent T cell-mediated immunity by producing reactive oxygen species (ROS), ablating L-arginine, and suppressing T cell proliferation [99]. MDSCs can also generate ROS by upregulating nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADP) oxidase and increasing STAT-3 activation. In addition, MDSCs hinder the antigen presentation of DCs and induce phagocytosis of NK cells, leading to immune suppression [101]. Furthermore, MDSCs influence tumor progression and metastasis by forming a pre-metastatic niche, promoting angiogenesis and tumor cell invasion by producing higher levels of FGF, VEGF, VEGF analog Bv8, and MMP-9 [98][102][103]. A study of leukocyte populations, including myeloid cell types, in canine models of OS revealed that percentages of polymorphonuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cells (PMN-MDSCs) and monocytic (M-) MDSCs were increased in dogs with OS [104]. Shi et al. identified the compound (S)-(−)-N-[2-(3-Hydroxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-methyl]-acetamide (SNA) isolated from the plant Selaginella pulvinata as an inhibitor of phosphatidylinositide 3-kinases (PI3Ks), which are known to activate MDSCs. SNA treatment of in vivo murine models of OS demonstrated decreased functional activity of MDSCs. Combination treatment with SNA and anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) antibody slowed OS tumor growth and improved survival by inhibiting MDSCs [105]. Thus, targeting MDSCs is an emerging therapeutic approach for OS.

4. Mast Cells

Mast cells in OS contribute to poor prognosis and tumor progression by promoting angiogenesis, extracellular matrix degradation, and tissue remodeling by producing angiogenic factors and proteases [106]. Lei et al. have identified a distinct nine-gene signature (ZFP90, UHRF2, SELPLG, PLD3, PLCB4, IFNGR1, DLEU2, ATP6V1E1, and ANXA5) that can accurately predict OS outcome and is strongly linked to activated mast cells [107]. Mast cells are primarily concentrated and sustained by cancer cells at the bone–tumor interface in OS. Mast cells are involved in local inflammation, immune cell recruitment, and osteoclastogenesis, indicating their role in OS progression and tissue repair. Mast cells potentially contribute to osteolysis through RANKL secretion [46]. In OS patients, activated mast cells display a complex phenomenon. Their presence is positively correlated with activated NK cells; however, mast cells are negatively correlated with M2 macrophages and memory B cells. Additionally, reduced infiltration of activated mast cells and DCs is associated with improved prognosis in OS patients [108]. Therefore, it is evident that the role of mast cells in shaping the OS microenvironment by regulating macrophage subtypes (M0, M1, and M2) and their impact on disease prognosis highlights their relevance as a potential therapeutic biomarker [108].

5. The Vasculature of the OS

Vascularization is driven by sprouting neoangiogenesis involving endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), which play a vital role in OS growth and dissemination. Amplified VEGF pathway genes, particularly VEGF-A, are associated with advanced tumor stages and metastasis [109]. Hypoxic and acidic bone microenvironments contribute to the expression of angiogenic factors, while aggressive OS cells may utilize vascular mimicry, forming vasculogenic microchannels [110][111]. Tumor-derived EVs, through their cargo containing angiocrines and angiogenesis-related miRNAs, facilitate intercellular communication and promote angiogenesis [112]. Therapeutically targeting neovascularization in OS has been explored through clinical trials using antiangiogenic agents, especially to inhibit VEGFRs, yielding promising results in increasing progression-free survival [113]. However, challenges remain in effectively targeting tumor cells and the vascular microenvironment, as demonstrated by the need for comprehensive strategies such as VEGFR-2 inhibition combined with other therapies. Park et al. targeted the tumor vasculature using the VEGF blockade, which showed enhanced high endothelial venules in the TME and substantially enhanced T cell infiltration, significantly improving the therapeutic efficacy in preclinical models [114]. Novel biomimetic scaffolds designed for coupled angiogenesis and osteogenesis hold potential for tissue engineering applications, expanding possible options for treating bone malignancies and defects [115]. Exosomes, acting as regulators of angiogenesis, downregulate exosomal lncRNA OIP5-AS1, potentially affecting angiogenesis through ATG5- and mir-153-mediated autophagy, suggesting new avenues for understanding tumor development and prognosis [112]. The convergence of these insights highlights the multifaceted impact of vasculature on OS behavior, indicating innovative strategies for therapeutic intervention and prognosis prediction.

6. The ECM of the OS Tumor

OS is characterized by its hallmark production of a rich ECM that influences tumor behavior and therapeutic responses [116][117][118]. The ECM includes components such as collagens, fibronectin, and laminins that contribute to aberrant signaling and structural abnormalities that promote sarcoma growth and also contribute to metastasis through distinct and interrelated mechanisms, including the interaction with cellular receptors associated with signaling pathways [116]. The ECM also modulates the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) axis, which regulates OS growth and resistance to conventional therapies [117]. Moreover, emerging research explores the potential for targeting the ECM in OS treatment. Hydrogels, resembling the ECM, can deliver therapeutic agents, offering a platform for OS therapy and bone regeneration [119]. Furthermore, the disruption of ECM-related factors such as neural EGF-like molecule 1 (NELL1) shows potential as a novel therapeutic approach to hinder OS progression [118]. Meanwhile, the crucial role of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their inhibition, exemplified by doxycycline treatment, reveals a promising chemotherapeutic avenue to curb OS aggressiveness by preventing ECM degradation and inhibiting angiogenesis [120].
The ECM interacts with the TME and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), contributing to OS development [118][121]. ECM components, such as EVs, are potential biomarkers for OS diagnosis and prognosis [122]. Novel approaches, such as 3D bioprinting with functionalized hydrogels, hold potential for targeted therapies by creating artificial microenvironments for improved treatment strategies [123]. Innovative approaches like attIL12-T cells also show promise by targeting CAFs within the ECM, disrupting tumor stroma, and favoring T-cell infiltration for enhanced therapy [121]. In conclusion, the significant role of the extracellular matrix in OS makes it a viable focus for therapeutic strategies.

7. Extracellular Vesicles in OS (EVs)

Tumor cells produce EVs that contain cargo, such as microRNA, RNA, and proteins, to communicate with surrounding cells. This can contribute to an immunosuppressive TME [124]. A study by Luong et al. revealed that EVs secreted by OS cells and taken up by monocytes decreased the expression of proinflammatory cytokines and increased the expression of suppressive cytokines and other suppressive molecules. Research into circulating nucleic acid sequences associated with EV preparations identified a greater representation of repetitive element sequences in sera collected from OS patients at diagnosis vs. controls [125]. A study into the contribution of EVs for pre-metastatic niche (PMN) formation in OS demonstrated that tumor-derived EVs are insufficient to establish the PMN. Therefore, EVs were proposed to function alongside soluble tumor-secreted factors to regulate metastatic OS progression and PMN formation [126].
Furthermore, EVs and extracellular particles derived from tumor tissue and plasma of OS patients and healthy controls identified six plasma proteins as biomarkers to distinguish cancer-patient plasma from control-subject plasma. These proteins—actin, skeletal alpha (α)-actin (ACTA1), gamma-enteric smooth muscle (ACTG2), a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 13 (ADAMTS13), hepatocyte growth factor activator (HGFAC), neprilysin (MME), and tenascin C (TNC)—were found only in the plasma isolated from OS patients [127]. Further research is necessary to strengthen the understanding of the role of EVs in OS tumor progression and metastasis.

8. Hypoxia and the Tumor Microenvironment of Osteosarcoma

Hypoxia, characterized by reduced oxygen levels within the TME, arises when rapid tumor expansion outpaces the vascular supply’s capacity to deliver oxygen [128]. This scenario activates various cellular mechanisms, primarily orchestrated by the transcriptional regulator Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α). HIF-1α, under hypoxic conditions, governs cellular responses pivotal to tumorigenesis and metastasis. In a compelling study, Zhang et al. elucidated the profound impact of a hypoxia-immune-related microenvironment on OS prognosis. They delineated how hypoxic conditions actively modulate immune cell infiltration, a phenomenon with significant ramifications for patient outcomes, and identified seven hypoxia- and immune-related genes, including BNIP3, SLC38A5, SLC5A3, CKMT2, S100A3, CXCL11, and PGM1, associated with the prognostic signature [129]. Fu et al. crafted a hypoxia-associated prognostic signature directly correlated with OS metastasis and immune infiltration [130]. Their findings offer insights into hypoxia’s multifaceted role, demonstrating its capacity to drive metastasis while simultaneously reshaping the immune landscape. Addressing hypoxia’s therapeutic potential, Chen et al. proposed an innovative strategy. They introduced Polydopamine-coated UiO-66 nanoparticles loaded with therapeutic agents designed explicitly for hypoxia-activated OS therapy [131]. Their approach capitalizes on the hypoxic environment, ensuring targeted drug activation within the tumor region. Furthermore, the intricate interplay between hypoxia and cellular signaling pathways has been spotlighted. For instance, He et al. showcased that zinc oxide nanoparticles could be harnessed to inhibit OS metastasis. They achieved this by perturbing the HIF-1α/BNIP3/LC3B-mediated mitophagy pathway, underscoring the therapeutic potential of targeting hypoxia-driven molecular routes [132]. Integrating therapy modalities, Zhao et al. elegantly demonstrated the enhanced efficacy achieved by coupling a hypoxia inhibitor with conventional chemotherapeutic agents. Their approach bolstered both antitumor and antimetastatic responses against OS, emphasizing the potential of targeting the hypoxic TME to improve therapeutic outcomes [133]. Deepening the understanding of the molecular intricacies of hypoxia, Han et al. conducted an extensive analysis of hypoxia-associated genes in OS [134]. Their results underscored the prognostic significance while highlighting their influence on the immune status and potential therapeutic avenues. Further illuminating hypoxia’s diverse impact, Shen et al. identified a feedback mechanism involving circular RNA Hsa_circ_0000566 and HIF-1α. This interaction fosters OS progression and promotes a shift in cellular metabolism towards glycolysis [135]. Highlighting the protective mechanisms tumors employ, Lu et al. discovered that in hypoxic OS cells, FOXO3a-driven upregulation of HSP90 can shield cells from cisplatin-induced apoptosis. This is achieved by stimulating FUNDC1-mediated mitophagy, emphasizing the challenges posed by hypoxia in cancer therapy [136]. In a recent contribution by Zheng et al., hypoxia’s role in metabolic reprogramming was spotlighted. Their work demonstrated that suppressing lncRNA DLGAP1-AS2 hinders OS progression by inhibiting aerobic glycolysis through the miR-451a/HK2 axis [137]. Recently, Subasinghe mapped hypoxia in real time in in vivo orthotopic syngeneic tumors to improve radiographic mapping, which is critical to the study of cancer and a wide range of diseases [138]. In summation, the hypoxic TME in OS emerges as a central player, orchestrating tumor progression, metastasis, immune modulation, metabolic shifts, and therapeutic responses. Delving into its intricacies offers a promising frontier for innovative therapeutic strategies in OS.

9. Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transformation and the Osteosarcoma Tumor Microenvironment

Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a highly complex and regulated pathway where the phenotype of the epithelial cells transforms into mesenchymal characteristics [139]. As OS cells originate from the mesenchymal cells, EMT pathways in OS are more likely associated with maintaining and promoting the mesenchymal phenotype. Gong et al. reported seven novel EMT-related genes for OS outcome prediction, including CDK3, MYC, UHRF2, STC2, COL5A2, MMD, and EHMT2. A high expression of EMT-related genes was associated with poor overall and recurrence-free survival compared to the low-expressing group [140]. The GSVA and GSEA analysis showed a nine-gene set for EMT, including LAMA3, LGALS1, SGCG, VEGFA, WNT5A, MATN3, ANPEP, FUCA1, and FLNA, as independent prognostic markers for OS patient survival [141]. Peng et al. established a positive correlation between the expression of EMT-related genes and immunity using GESA and microarray data analysis. Higher EMT gene expression was associated with poor overall and recurrence-free survival [142]. The expression of EMT transcriptional factors, including TWIST1, SLUG, ZEB1, ZEB2, and SNAIL, is associated with aggressive behavior and metastasis of OS [139][143][144]. Several miRNAs, including miR-18a-5p, miR-22, miR-33A, miR-221, miR-300, miR-580-3p, and miR-610, are associated with the regulation of the EMT in OS cells via targeting TWIST1 [145][146][147][148][149][150]. Chen et al. demonstrated that HDAC5 promotes OS tumor progression by upregulating TWIST 1 expression [151]. The overexpression of ZEB1 is associated with OS tumorigenesis and metastasis, and ZEB1 blocking can suppress metastasis and prevent OBs’ differentiation into OS cells [152][153]. ZEB1/2 suppression by long non-coding (lnc)-RNA sprouty receptor tyrosine kinase signaling antagonist 4-intronic transcript 1 (SPRY4-IT1), mediated through miR-101, showed antitumor activities in OS [154]. Overexpression of SNAIL-1 was found to be associated with the OS progression, mediated through the suppression of E-cadherin expression [155]. SIRT2 knockdown inhibited SNAIL expression and abrogated the migration-and-invasion-promoting phenotype in OS [156]. Glaucocalyxin A, a bioactive ent-kauranoid diterpenoid, inhibits OS lung metastasis by suppressing the protein expression of SNAIL and SLUG [157]. At the same time, GATA3 suppresses OS progression and metastasis through SLUG regulation [158]. Studies have shown that EMT signaling is vital for maintaining the mesenchymal status of OS. It is also associated with tumor progression, metastasis, and therapeutic responses, so targeting EMT pathways may provide new opportunities to identify potential molecular targets for OS.

10. Ferroptosis and the Osteosarcoma Tumor Microenvironment

Ferroptosis is a type of nonapoptotic cell death that is dependent on intracellular iron, responsible for the accumulation of lethal lipid reactive oxygen species (ROS) [159]. The mechanism of ferroptosis involves iron-dependent phospholipid peroxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acid chains. The enzyme glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) opposes ferroptosis by inhibiting phospholipid peroxidation [160]. The induction of ferroptosis has been shown to be effective against rhabdomyosarcoma tumor cells [161]. Similarly, therapeutic approaches meant to initiate ferroptosis can be effective against OS tumors [162]. As an example, the transcription activator signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) is known to be activated in many cancers, including OS, and contributes to cisplatin resistance; treatment of OS cisplatin-resistant cell lines in vitro with cisplatin along with a STAT3 inhibitor (BP-1-102) resulted in increased ferroptosis activity and decreased cell viability. Furthermore, treatment with the ferroptosis agonists erastin and RSL3 decreased the cell viability of cisplatin-resistant cell lines following exposure to cisplatin [163]. Thus, activating ferroptosis can be a reasonable approach to minimize cisplatin resistance in OS. Lei et al. developed a prognostic model using ferroptosis-related genes to predict the risk and prognosis of OS patients. In addition, patients in the high-risk group displayed a lower abundance of immune cells, such as dendritic cells, macrophages, B cells, and CD4+ T cells [164]. The strongest independent prognostic risk genes related to ferroptosis and immune pathways were found to be WNT16, GLB1L2, CORT, and WAS [165]. Ferroptosis presents a potential therapeutic target against OS and various other types of cancer.

References

  1. Amarasekara, D.S.; Kim, S.; Rho, J. Regulation of Osteoblast Differentiation by Cytokine Networks. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2851.
  2. Komori, T. Regulation of Proliferation, Differentiation and Functions of Osteoblasts by Runx2. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1694.
  3. Komori, T. Runx2, an inducer of osteoblast and chondrocyte differentiation. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2018, 149, 313–323.
  4. Hou, Z.; Wang, Z.; Tao, Y.; Bai, J.; Yu, B.; Shen, J.; Sun, H.; Xiao, L.; Xu, Y.; Zhou, J.; et al. KLF2 regulates osteoblast differentiation by targeting of Runx2. Lab. Investig. 2019, 99, 271–280.
  5. Kim, I.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, K.; Seong, S.; Kim, N. The IRF2BP2-KLF2 axis regulates osteoclast and osteoblast differentiation. BMB Rep. 2019, 52, 469–474.
  6. Chen, X.; Wang, Z.; Duan, N.; Zhu, G.; Schwarz, E.M.; Xie, C. Osteoblast-osteoclast interactions. Connect. Tissue Res. 2018, 59, 99–107.
  7. Ponzetti, M.; Ucci, A.; Puri, C.; Giacchi, L.; Flati, I.; Capece, D.; Zazzeroni, F.; Cappariello, A.; Rucci, N.; Falone, S. Effects of osteoblast-derived extracellular vesicles on aggressiveness, redox status and mitochondrial bioenergetics of MNNG/HOS osteosarcoma cells. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 983254.
  8. Chen, F.; Liu, J.; Yang, T.; Sun, J.; He, X.; Fu, X.; Qiao, S.; An, J.; Yang, J. Analysis of intercellular communication in the osteosarcoma microenvironment based on single cell sequencing data. J. Bone Oncol. 2023, 41, 100493.
  9. Kim, J.-M.; Lin, C.; Stavre, Z.; Greenblatt, M.B.; Shim, J.-H. Osteoblast-Osteoclast Communication and Bone Homeostasis. Cells 2020, 9, 2073.
  10. Atkinson, E.G.; Delgado-Calle, J. The Emerging Role of Osteocytes in Cancer in Bone. JBMR Plus 2019, 3, e10186.
  11. Behzatoglu, K. Osteoclasts in Tumor Biology: Metastasis and Epithelial-Mesenchymal-Myeloid Transition. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 2021, 27, 609472.
  12. Lampiasi, N.; Russo, R.; Zito, F. The Alternative Faces of Macrophage Generate Osteoclasts. Biomed. Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 9089610.
  13. Amarasekara, D.S.; Yun, H.; Kim, S.; Lee, N.; Kim, H.; Rho, J. Regulation of Osteoclast Differentiation by Cytokine Networks. Immune Netw. 2018, 18, e8.
  14. Nirala, B.; Kurenbekova, L.; Patel, T.; Shuck, R.; Dasgupta, A.; Rainusso, N.; Yustein, J. Abstract 6713: Myc-regulated miR17, 20a modulate RANK expression in osteosarcoma. Cancer Res. 2023, 83, 6713.
  15. Feng, X.; Teitelbaum, S.L. Osteoclasts: New Insights. Bone Res. 2013, 1, 11–26.
  16. Zeng, J.; Peng, Y.; Wang, D.; Ayesha, K.; Chen, S. The interaction between osteosarcoma and other cells in the bone microenvironment: From mechanism to clinical applications. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2023, 11, 1123065.
  17. Luo, T.; Zhou, X.; Jiang, E.; Wang, L.; Ji, Y.; Shang, Z. Osteosarcoma Cell-Derived Small Extracellular Vesicles Enhance Osteoclastogenesis and Bone Resorption Through Transferring MicroRNA-19a-3p. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 618662.
  18. Araki, Y.; Yamamoto, N.; Hayashi, K.; Takeuchi, A.; Miwa, S.; Igarashi, K.; Higuchi, T.; Abe, K.; Taniguchi, Y.; Yonezawa, H.; et al. The number of osteoclasts in a biopsy specimen can predict the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary osteosarcoma. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1989.
  19. Zhou, Y.; Yang, D.; Yang, Q.; Lv, X.; Huang, W.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Yuan, T.; Ding, X.; et al. Single-cell RNA landscape of intratumoral heterogeneity and immunosuppressive microenvironment in advanced osteosarcoma. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 6322.
  20. Li, H.; Hong, S.; Qian, J.; Zheng, Y.; Yang, J.; Yi, Q. Cross talk between the bone and immune systems: Osteoclasts function as antigen-presenting cells and activate CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Blood 2010, 116, 210–217.
  21. Li, F.; Tang, H.; Luo, X.; Li, X.; Luo, K.; Liu, S.; Liang, J.; Liao, S.; Zhong, C.; Zhan, X.; et al. Interaction gene set between osteoclasts and regulatory CD4+ T cells can accurately predict the prognosis of patients with osteosarcoma. Cancer Sci. 2023, 114, 3014–3026.
  22. Liu, L.; Geng, H.; Mei, C.; Chen, L. Zoledronic Acid Enhanced the Antitumor Effect of Cisplatin on Orthotopic Osteosarcoma by ROS-PI3K/AKT Signaling and Attenuated Osteolysis. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2021, 2021, 6661534.
  23. Lu, K.-H.; Lu, E.W.-H.; Lin, C.-W.; Yang, J.-S.; Yang, S.-F. New insights into molecular and cellular mechanisms of zoledronate in human osteosarcoma. Pharmacol. Ther. 2020, 214, 107611.
  24. Endo-Munoz, L.; Cumming, A.; Rickwood, D.; Wilson, D.; Cueva, C.; Ng, C.; Strutton, G.; Cassady, A.I.; Evdokiou, A.; Sommerville, S. Loss of osteoclasts contributes to development of osteosarcoma pulmonary metastases. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 7063–7072.
  25. Endo-Munoz, L.; Evdokiou, A.; Saunders, N.A. The role of osteoclasts and tumour-associated macrophages in osteosarcoma metastasis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA—Rev. Cancer 2012, 1826, 434–442.
  26. Anloague, A.; Delgado-Calle, J. Osteocytes: New Kids on the Block for Cancer in Bone Therapy. Cancers 2023, 15, 2645.
  27. Zheng, Y.; Wang, G.; Chen, R.; Hua, Y.; Cai, Z. Mesenchymal stem cells in the osteosarcoma microenvironment: Their biological properties, influence on tumor growth, and therapeutic implications. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2018, 9, 22.
  28. Li, F.; Chen, X.; Shang, C.; Ying, Q.; Zhou, X.; Zhu, R.; Lu, H.; Hao, X.; Dong, Q.; Jiang, Z. Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Promote Proliferation, Invasion and Migration of Osteosarcoma Cells via the lncRNA MALAT1/miR-143/NRSN2/Wnt/β-Catenin Axis. OncoTargets Ther. 2021, 14, 737–749.
  29. Zhu, G.; Xia, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Li, A.; Li, H.; Xiao, T. LncRNA XIST from the bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell derived exosome promotes osteosarcoma growth and metastasis through miR-655/ACLY signal. Cancer Cell Int. 2022, 22, 330.
  30. Feng, H.; Zhang, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, L.; Shan, B. Leptin acts on mesenchymal stem cells to promote chemoresistance in osteosarcoma cells. Aging 2020, 12, 6340–6351.
  31. Huang, Y.; Liu, W.; He, B.; Wang, L.; Zhang, F.; Shu, H.; Sun, L. Exosomes derived from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells promote osteosarcoma development by activating oncogenic autophagy. J. Bone Oncol. 2020, 21, 100280.
  32. Chang, X.; Ma, Z.; Zhu, G.; Lu, Y.; Yang, J. New perspective into mesenchymal stem cells: Molecular mechanisms regulating osteosarcoma. J. Bone Oncol. 2021, 29, 100372.
  33. Wei, H.; Chen, J.; Wang, S.; Fu, F.; Zhu, X.; Wu, C.; Liu, Z.; Zhong, G.; Lin, J. A Nanodrug Consisting Of Doxorubicin And Exosome Derived From Mesenchymal Stem Cells For Osteosarcoma Treatment In Vitro. Int. J. Nanomed. 2019, 14, 8603–8610.
  34. Qin, F.; Tang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Huang, P.; Zhu, J. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomal microRNA-208a promotes osteosarcoma cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. J. Cell Physiol. 2020, 235, 4734–4745.
  35. Qi, J.; Zhang, R.; Wang, Y. Exosomal miR-21-5p derived from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells promote osteosarcoma cell proliferation and invasion by targeting PIK3R1. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2021, 25, 11016–11030.
  36. Zhang, H.; Wang, J.; Ren, T.; Huang, Y.; Liang, X.; Yu, Y.; Wang, W.; Niu, J.; Guo, W. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomal miR-206 inhibits osteosarcoma progression by targeting TRA2B. Cancer Lett. 2020, 490, 54–65.
  37. Zhu, T.; Han, J.; Yang, L.; Cai, Z.; Sun, W.; Hua, Y.; Xu, J. Immune Microenvironment in Osteosarcoma: Components, Therapeutic Strategies and Clinical Applications. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 907550.
  38. Liu, W.; Hu, H.; Shao, Z.; Lv, X.; Zhang, Z.; Deng, X.; Song, Q.; Han, Y.; Guo, T.; Xiong, L.; et al. Characterizing the tumor microenvironment at the single-cell level reveals a novel immune evasion mechanism in osteosarcoma. Bone Res. 2023, 11, 4.
  39. Yang, H.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, Y.; Li, F.-F. A comprehensive analysis of immune infiltration in the tumor microenvironment of osteosarcoma. Cancer Med. 2021, 10, 5696–5711.
  40. Mani, N.; Andrews, D.; Obeng, R.C. Modulation of T cell function and survival by the tumor microenvironment. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2023, 11, 1191774.
  41. Wu, C.-C.; Beird, H.C.; Andrew Livingston, J.; Advani, S.; Mitra, A.; Cao, S.; Reuben, A.; Ingram, D.; Wang, W.-L.; Ju, Z.; et al. Immuno-genomic landscape of osteosarcoma. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1008.
  42. Zhou, Z.; Yan, S.; Zhang, R.; Wang, H.; Ye, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Li, K.; Zuo, G. CTGF/CCN2 promotes the proliferation of human osteosarcoma cells via cross-talking with the stromal CXCL12/CXCR4-AKT-αvβ3 signaling axis in tumor microenvironment. Genes Dis. 2023, 10, 356–358.
  43. Cortini, M.; Macchi, F.; Reggiani, F.; Vitale, E.; Lipreri, M.V.; Perut, F.; Ciarrocchi, A.; Baldini, N.; Avnet, S. Endogenous Extracellular Matrix Regulates the Response of Osteosarcoma 3D Spheroids to Doxorubicin. Cancers 2023, 15, 1221.
  44. Osaki, M.; Takeshita, F.; Sugimoto, Y.; Kosaka, N.; Yamamoto, Y.; Yoshioka, Y.; Kobayashi, E.; Yamada, T.; Kawai, A.; Inoue, T.; et al. MicroRNA-143 regulates human osteosarcoma metastasis by regulating matrix metalloprotease-13 expression. Mol. Ther. 2011, 19, 1123–1130.
  45. Petitprez, F.; de Reyniès, A.; Keung, E.Z.; Chen, T.W.-W.; Sun, C.-M.; Calderaro, J.; Jeng, Y.-M.; Hsiao, L.-P.; Lacroix, L.; Bougoüin, A.; et al. B cells are associated with survival and immunotherapy response in sarcoma. Nature 2020, 577, 556–560.
  46. Heymann, M.F.; Lézot, F.; Heymann, D. The contribution of immune infiltrates and the local microenvironment in the pathogenesis of osteosarcoma. Cell. Immunol. 2019, 343, 103711.
  47. Kendal, J.K.; Shehata, M.S.; Lofftus, S.Y.; Crompton, J.G. Cancer-Associated B Cells in Sarcoma. Cancers 2023, 15, 622.
  48. Zhao, G.; Liang, J.; Cao, J.; Jiang, S.; Lu, J.; Jiang, B. Abnormal Function of Circulating Follicular Helper T Cells Leads to Different Manifestations of B Cell Maturation and Differentiation in Patients with Osteosarcoma. J. Healthc. Eng. 2022, 2022, 3724033.
  49. Yang, M.; Cao, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, T.; Hua, Y.; Cai, Z. Identification of two immune subtypes in osteosarcoma based on immune gene sets. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2021, 96, 107799.
  50. Wang, Z.; Liang, J.; Jiang, S.; Zhao, G.; Lu, J.; Jiang, B. The Effect of miR-138 on the Function of Follicular Helper T Cells and the Differentiation of B Cells in Osteosarcoma. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2021, 2021, 2057782.
  51. Bod, L.; Kye, Y.-C.; Shi, J.; Torlai Triglia, E.; Schnell, A.; Fessler, J.; Ostrowski, S.M.; Von-Franque, M.Y.; Kuchroo, J.R.; Barilla, R.M.; et al. B-cell-specific checkpoint molecules that regulate anti-tumour immunity. Nature 2023, 619, 348–356.
  52. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Duan, Y.; Li, X.; Pan, J.; Wang, G.; Shen, B. Identification of B cell marker genes based on single-cell sequencing to establish a prognostic model and identify immune infiltration in osteosarcoma. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 1026701.
  53. Lachota, M.; Vincenti, M.; Winiarska, M.; Boye, K.; Zagożdżon, R.; Malmberg, K.-J. Prospects for NK Cell Therapy of Sarcoma. Cancers 2020, 12, 3719.
  54. Wang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Li, B.; Wang, S.; Chen, T.; Ye, Z. Innate Immune Cells: A Potential and Promising Cell Population for Treating Osteosarcoma. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1114.
  55. Quamine, A.E.; Olsen, M.R.; Cho, M.M.; Capitini, C.M. Approaches to Enhance Natural Killer Cell-Based Immunotherapy for Pediatric Solid Tumors. Cancers 2021, 13, 2796.
  56. Marchais, A.; Marques da Costa, M.E.; Job, B.; Abbas, R.; Drubay, D.; Piperno-Neumann, S.; Fromigué, O.; Gomez-Brouchet, A.; Redini, F.; Droit, R.; et al. Immune Infiltrate and Tumor Microenvironment Transcriptional Programs Stratify Pediatric Osteosarcoma into Prognostic Groups at Diagnosis. Cancer Res. 2022, 82, 974–985.
  57. Zhang, Z.; Ji, W.; Huang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, J.; Dong, Y.; Yuan, T.; Yang, Q.; Ding, X.; et al. Characterization of the tumour microenvironment phenotypes in malignant tissues and pleural effusion from advanced osteoblastic osteosarcoma patients. Clin. Transl. Med. 2022, 12, e1072.
  58. Bi, J.; Tian, Z. NK Cell Exhaustion. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 760.
  59. Rademacher, M.J.; Cruz, A.; Faber, M.; Oldham, R.A.A.; Wang, D.; Medin, J.A.; Schloemer, N.J. Sarcoma IL-12 overexpression facilitates NK cell immunomodulation. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 8321.
  60. Omer, N.; Nicholls, W.; Ruegg, B.; Souza-Fonseca-Guimaraes, F.; Rossi, G.R. Enhancing Natural Killer Cell Targeting of Pediatric Sarcoma. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 791206.
  61. Chu, Y.; Nayyar, G.; Jiang, S.; Rosenblum, J.M.; Soon-Shiong, P.; Safrit, J.T.; Lee, D.A.; Cairo, M.S. Combinatorial immunotherapy of N-803 (IL-15 superagonist) and dinutuximab with ex vivo expanded natural killer cells significantly enhances in vitro cytotoxicity against GD2+ pediatric solid tumors and in vivo survival of xenografted immunodeficient NSG mice. J. Immunother. Cancer 2021, 9, e002267.
  62. Judge, S.J.; Darrow, M.A.; Thorpe, S.W.; Gingrich, A.A.; O’Donnell, E.F.; Bellini, A.R.; Sturgill, I.S.; Vick, L.V.; Dunai, C.; Stoffel, K.M.; et al. Analysis of tumor-infiltrating NK and T cells highlights IL-15 stimulation and TIGIT blockade as a combination immunotherapy strategy for soft tissue sarcomas. J. ImmunoTherapy Cancer 2020, 8, e001355.
  63. Lu, X.; Liu, M.; Yang, J.; Que, Y.; Zhang, X. Panobinostat enhances NK cell cytotoxicity in soft tissue sarcoma. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2022, 209, 127–139.
  64. Kawamoto, H.; Minato, N. Myeloid cells. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2004, 36, 1374–1379.
  65. De Kleer, I.; Willems, F.; Lambrecht, B.; Goriely, S. Ontogeny of myeloid cells. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 423.
  66. Pratt, H.G.; Justin, E.M.; Lindsey, B.A. Applying Osteosarcoma Immunology to Understand Disease Progression and Assess Immunotherapeutic Response. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2020, 1258, 91–109.
  67. Liu, J.F.; Chen, P.C.; Chang, T.M.; Hou, C.H. Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 promotes cancer cell migration via c-Raf/MAPK/AP-1 pathway and MMP-9 production in osteosarcoma. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020, 39, 254.
  68. Regan, D.P.; Coy, J.W.; Chahal, K.K.; Chow, L.; Kurihara, J.N.; Guth, A.M.; Kufareva, I.; Dow, S.W. The Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Losartan Suppresses Growth of Pulmonary Metastases via AT1R-Independent Inhibition of CCR2 Signaling and Monocyte Recruitment. J. Immunol. 2019, 202, 3087–3102.
  69. Regan, D.P.; Chow, L.; Das, S.; Haines, L.; Palmer, E.; Kurihara, J.N.; Coy, J.W.; Mathias, A.; Thamm, D.H.; Gustafson, D.L.; et al. Losartan Blocks Osteosarcoma-Elicited Monocyte Recruitment, and Combined With the Kinase Inhibitor Toceranib, Exerts Significant Clinical Benefit in Canine Metastatic Osteosarcoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2022, 28, 662–676.
  70. Kelleher, F.C.; O’Sullivan, H. Monocytes, Macrophages, and Osteoclasts in Osteosarcoma. J. Adolesc. Young Adult Oncol. 2017, 6, 396–405.
  71. Chazaud, B. Macrophages: Supportive cells for tissue repair and regeneration. Immunobiology 2014, 219, 172–178.
  72. Luo, Z.-W.; Liu, P.-P.; Wang, Z.-X.; Chen, C.-Y.; Xie, H. Macrophages in Osteosarcoma Immune Microenvironment: Implications for Immunotherapy. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 586580.
  73. Duan, Z.; Luo, Y. Targeting macrophages in cancer immunotherapy. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 127.
  74. Sica, A.; Mantovani, A. Macrophage plasticity and polarization: In vivo veritas. J. Clin. Investig. 2012, 122, 787–795.
  75. Mantovani, A.; Marchesi, F.; Malesci, A.; Laghi, L.; Allavena, P. Tumour-associated macrophages as treatment targets in oncology. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 14, 399–416.
  76. Kielbassa, K.; Vegna, S.; Ramirez, C.; Akkari, L. Understanding the Origin and Diversity of Macrophages to Tailor Their Targeting in Solid Cancers. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2215.
  77. Cassetta, L.; Pollard, J.W. Targeting macrophages: Therapeutic approaches in cancer. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2018, 17, 887–904.
  78. Noy, R.; Pollard, J.W. Tumor-associated macrophages: From mechanisms to therapy. Immunity 2014, 41, 49–61.
  79. Coffelt, S.B.; Hughes, R.; Lewis, C.E. Tumor-associated macrophages: Effectors of angiogenesis and tumor progression. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2009, 1796, 11–18.
  80. Cersosimo, F.; Lonardi, S.; Bernardini, G.; Telfer, B.; Mandelli, G.E.; Santucci, A.; Vermi, W.; Giurisato, E. Tumor-Associated Macrophages in Osteosarcoma: From Mechanisms to Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5207.
  81. Mao, X.; Song, F.; Jin, J.; Zou, B.; Dai, P.; Sun, M.; Xu, W.; Wang, L.; Kang, Y. Prognostic and immunological significance of an M1 macrophage-related gene signature in osteosarcoma. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1202725.
  82. Anand, N.; Peh, K.H.; Kolesar, J.M. Macrophage Repolarization as a Therapeutic Strategy for Osteosarcoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 2858.
  83. Su, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Sun, Y.-J.; Wang, Y.-L.; Yin, J.-Y.; Huang, Y.-J.; Zhang, J.-J.; He, A.-N.; Han, K.; Zhang, H.-Z.; et al. Macrophage-derived CCL18 promotes osteosarcoma proliferation and migration by upregulating the expression of UCA1. J. Mol. Med. 2019, 97, 49–61.
  84. Zhou, Q.; Xian, M.; Xiang, S.; Xiang, D.; Shao, X.; Wang, J.; Cao, J.; Yang, X.; Yang, B.; Ying, M.; et al. All-Trans Retinoic Acid Prevents Osteosarcoma Metastasis by Inhibiting M2 Polarization of Tumor-Associated Macrophages. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2017, 5, 547–559.
  85. Han, Y.; Guo, W.; Ren, T.; Huang, Y.; Wang, S.; Liu, K.; Zheng, B.; Yang, K.; Zhang, H.; Liang, X. Tumor-associated macrophages promote lung metastasis and induce epithelial-mesenchymal transition in osteosarcoma by activating the COX-2/STAT3 axis. Cancer Lett. 2019, 440–441, 116–125.
  86. Cheng, Z.; Wang, L.; Wu, C.; Huang, L.; Ruan, Y.; Xue, W. Tumor-derived Exosomes Induced M2 Macrophage Polarization and Promoted the Metastasis of Osteosarcoma Cells Through Tim-3. Arch. Med. Res. 2021, 52, 200–210.
  87. Han, Z.P.; Liu, D.B.; Wu, L.Q.; Li, Q.; Wang, Z.G.; Zang, X.F. IL-1beta secreted by macrophage M2 promotes metastasis of osteosarcoma via NF-kappaB/miR-181alpha-5p/RASSF1A/Wnt pathway. Transl. Cancer Res. 2020, 9, 2721–2733.
  88. Shao, X.J.; Xiang, S.F.; Chen, Y.Q.; Zhang, N.; Cao, J.; Zhu, H.; Yang, B.; Zhou, Q.; Ying, M.D.; He, Q.J. Inhibition of M2-like macrophages by all-trans retinoic acid prevents cancer initiation and stemness in osteosarcoma cells. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2019, 40, 1343–1350.
  89. Li, D.K.; Wang, G.H. Asiaticoside reverses M2 phenotype macrophage polarization-evoked osteosarcoma cell malignant behaviour by TRAF6/NF-kappaB inhibition. Pharm. Biol. 2022, 60, 1635–1645.
  90. Marciscano, A.E.; Anandasabapathy, N. The role of dendritic cells in cancer and anti-tumor immunity. Semin. Immunol. 2021, 52, 101481.
  91. Soto, J.A.; Gálvez, N.M.S.; Andrade, C.A.; Pacheco, G.A.; Bohmwald, K.; Berrios, R.V.; Bueno, S.M.; Kalergis, A.M. The Role of Dendritic Cells During Infections Caused by Highly Prevalent Viruses. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1513.
  92. Kawano, M.; Tanaka, K.; Itonaga, I.; Iwasaki, T.; Miyazaki, M.; Ikeda, S.; Tsumura, H. Dendritic cells combined with doxorubicin induces immunogenic cell death and exhibits antitumor effects for osteosarcoma. Oncol. Lett. 2016, 11, 2169–2175.
  93. Kawano, M.; Itonaga, I.; Iwasaki, T.; Tsuchiya, H.; Tsumura, H. Anti-TGF-beta antibody combined with dendritic cells produce antitumor effects in osteosarcoma. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2012, 470, 2288–2294.
  94. Zhang, F.; Zhu, Y.; Fan, G.; Hu, S. Photodynamic therapy reduces the inhibitory effect of osteosarcoma cells on dendritic cells by upregulating HSP70. Oncol. Lett. 2018, 16, 5034–5040.
  95. Pan, R.; Pan, F.; Zeng, Z.; Lei, S.; Yang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Hu, C.; Chen, H.; Tian, X. A novel immune cell signature for predicting osteosarcoma prognosis and guiding therapy. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 1017120.
  96. Tan, S.; Chao, R. An Exploration of Osteosarcoma Metastasis Diagnostic Markers Based on Tumor-Associated Neutrophils. Discov. Med. 2023, 35, 300–311.
  97. Tang, H.; Liu, D.; Lu, J.; He, J.; Ji, S.; Liao, S.; Wei, Q.; Lu, S.; Liu, Y. Significance of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in extremity osteosarcoma: A multicentre retrospective study. BMC Cancer 2022, 22, 33.
  98. Ling, Z.; Yang, C.; Tan, J.; Dou, C.; Chen, Y. Beyond immunosuppressive effects: Dual roles of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in bone-related diseases. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2021, 78, 7161–7183.
  99. Joshi, S.; Sharabi, A. Targeting myeloid-derived suppressor cells to enhance natural killer cell-based immunotherapy. Pharmacol. Ther. 2022, 235, 108114.
  100. Novitskiy, S.V.; Pickup, M.W.; Gorska, A.E.; Owens, P.; Chytil, A.; Aakre, M.; Wu, H.; Shyr, Y.; Moses, H.L. TGF-β Receptor II Loss Promotes Mammary Carcinoma Progression by Th17-Dependent Mechanisms. Cancer Discov. 2011, 1, 430–441.
  101. Porta, C.; Consonni, F.M.; Morlacchi, S.; Sangaletti, S.; Bleve, A.; Totaro, M.G.; Larghi, P.; Rimoldi, M.; Tripodo, C.; Strauss, L.; et al. Tumor-Derived Prostaglandin E2 Promotes p50 NF-κB-Dependent Differentiation of Monocytic MDSCs. Cancer Res. 2020, 80, 2874–2888.
  102. Condamine, T.; Ramachandran, I.; Youn, J.-I.; Gabrilovich, D.I. Regulation of Tumor Metastasis by Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells. Annu. Rev. Med. 2015, 66, 97–110.
  103. Marvel, D.; Gabrilovich, D.I. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the tumor microenvironment: Expect the unexpected. J. Clin. Investig. 2015, 125, 3356–3364.
  104. Ammons, D.T.; Harris, R.A.; Hopkins, L.S.; Kurihara, J.; Weishaar, K.; Dow, S. A single-cell RNA sequencing atlas of circulating leukocytes from healthy and osteosarcoma affected dogs. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1162700.
  105. Shi, X.; Li, X.; Wang, H.; Yu, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Gao, Y. Specific inhibition of PI3Kδ/γ enhances the efficacy of anti-PD1 against osteosarcoma cancer. J. Bone Oncol. 2019, 16, 100206.
  106. Le, T.; Su, S.; Shahriyari, L. Immune classification of osteosarcoma. Math. Biosci. Eng. 2021, 18, 1879–1897.
  107. Fan, L.; Ru, J.; Liu, T.; Ma, C. Identification of a Novel Prognostic Gene Signature From the Immune Cell Infiltration Landscape of Osteosarcoma. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 718624.
  108. Wei, J.; Fang, D.-L.; Huang, C.K.; Hua, S.-L.; Lu, X.-S. Screening a novel signature and predicting the immune landscape of metastatic osteosarcoma in children via immune-related lncRNAs. Transl. Pediatr. 2021, 10, 1851–1866.
  109. Corre, I.; Verrecchia, F.; Crenn, V.; Redini, F.; Trichet, V. The Osteosarcoma Microenvironment: A Complex But Targetable Ecosystem. Cells 2020, 9, 976.
  110. Ren, K.; Yao, N.; Wang, G.; Tian, L.; Ma, J.; Shi, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, X.; Zhou, G.; et al. Vasculogenic mimicry: A new prognostic sign of human osteosarcoma. Hum. Pathol. 2014, 45, 2120–2129.
  111. Ren, K.; Zhang, J.; Gu, X.; Wu, S.; Shi, X.; Ni, Y.; Chen, Y.; Lu, J.; Gao, Z.; Wang, C.; et al. Migration-inducing gene-7 independently predicts poor prognosis of human osteosarcoma and is associated with vasculogenic mimicry. Exp. Cell Res. 2018, 369, 80–89.
  112. Li, Y.; Lin, S.; Xie, X.; Zhu, H.; Fan, T.; Wang, S. Highly enriched exosomal lncRNA OIP5-AS1 regulates osteosarcoma tumor angiogenesis and autophagy through miR-153 and ATG5. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2021, 13, 4211–4223.
  113. Assi, T.; Watson, S.; Samra, B.; Rassy, E.; Le Cesne, A.; Italiano, A.; Mir, O. Targeting the VEGF Pathway in Osteosarcoma. Cells 2021, 10, 1240.
  114. Park, J.A.; Espinosa-Cotton, M.; Guo, H.F.; Monette, S.; Cheung, N.V. Targeting tumor vasculature to improve antitumor activity of T cells armed ex vivo with T cell engaging bispecific antibody. J. Immunother. Cancer 2023, 11, e006680.
  115. Yin, J.; Pan, S.; Guo, X.; Gao, Y.; Zhu, D.; Yang, Q.; Gao, J.; Zhang, C.; Chen, Y. Nb2C MXene-Functionalized Scaffolds Enables Osteosarcoma Phototherapy and Angiogenesis/Osteogenesis of Bone Defects. Nanomicro Lett. 2021, 13, 30.
  116. Cui, J.; Dean, D.; Hornicek, F.J.; Chen, Z.; Duan, Z. The role of extracelluar matrix in osteosarcoma progression and metastasis. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020, 39, 178.
  117. Tzanakakis, G.N.; Giatagana, E.M.; Berdiaki, A.; Spyridaki, I.; Hida, K.; Neagu, M.; Tsatsakis, A.M.; Nikitovic, D. The Role of IGF/IGF-IR-Signaling and Extracellular Matrix Effectors in Bone Sarcoma Pathogenesis. Cancers 2021, 13, 2478.
  118. Qin, Q.; Gomez-Salazar, M.; Tower, R.J.; Chang, L.; Morris, C.D.; McCarthy, E.F.; Ting, K.; Zhang, X.; James, A.W. NELL1 Regulates the Matrisome to Promote Osteosarcoma Progression. Cancer Res. 2022, 82, 2734–2747.
  119. Tian, H.; Wu, R.; Feng, N.; Zhang, J.; Zuo, J. Recent advances in hydrogels-based osteosarcoma therapy. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 1042625.
  120. Yang, Q.; Liu, J.; Wu, B.; Wang, X.; Jiang, Y.; Zhu, D. Role of extracellular vesicles in osteosarcoma. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2022, 19, 1216–1226.
  121. Hu, J.; Lazar, A.; Ingram, D.; Wang, W.-L.; Zhang, W.; Jia, Z.; Ragoonanan, D.; Wang, J.; Xia, X.; Mahadeo, K.; et al. Abstract 4102: attIL12-T cell therapy destructs cancer-associated fibroblasts and extracellular matrix in heterogenous osteosarcoma xenograft models. Cancer Res. 2023, 83, 4102.
  122. Loi, G.; Stucchi, G.; Scocozza, F.; Cansolino, L.; Cadamuro, F.; Delgrosso, E.; Riva, F.; Ferrari, C.; Russo, L.; Conti, M. Characterization of a Bioink Combining Extracellular Matrix-like Hydrogel with Osteosarcoma Cells: Preliminary Results. Gels 2023, 9, 129.
  123. Kim, H.-S.; Kim, H.J.; Lee, M.R.; Han, I. EMMPRIN expression is associated with metastatic progression in osteosarcoma. BMC Cancer 2021, 21, 1059.
  124. Luong, N.; Lenz, J.A.; Modiano, J.F.; Olson, J.K. Extracellular Vesicles Secreted by Tumor Cells Promote the Generation of Suppressive Monocytes. Immunohorizons 2021, 5, 647–658.
  125. Cambier, L.; Stachelek, K.; Triska, M.; Jubran, R.; Huang, M.; Li, W.; Zhang, J.; Li, J.; Cobrinik, D. Extracellular vesicle-associated repetitive element DNAs as candidate osteosarcoma biomarkers. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 94.
  126. Mazumdar, A.; Urdinez, J.; Boro, A.; Arlt, M.J.E.; Egli, F.E.; Niederost, B.; Jaeger, P.K.; Moschini, G.; Muff, R.; Fuchs, B.; et al. Exploring the Role of Osteosarcoma-Derived Extracellular Vesicles in Pre-Metastatic Niche Formation and Metastasis in the 143-B Xenograft Mouse Osteosarcoma Model. Cancers 2020, 12, 3457.
  127. Hoshino, A.; Kim, H.S.; Bojmar, L.; Gyan, K.E.; Cioffi, M.; Hernandez, J.; Zambirinis, C.P.; Rodrigues, G.; Molina, H.; Heissel, S.; et al. Extracellular Vesicle and Particle Biomarkers Define Multiple Human Cancers. Cell 2020, 182, 1044–1061.e18.
  128. Muz, B.; de la Puente, P.; Azab, F.; Azab, A.K. The role of hypoxia in cancer progression, angiogenesis, metastasis, and resistance to therapy. Hypoxia 2015, 3, 83–92.
  129. Zhang, W.; Lyu, P.; Andreev, D.; Jia, Y.; Zhang, F.; Bozec, A. Hypoxia-immune-related microenvironment prognostic signature for osteosarcoma. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022, 10, 974851.
  130. Fu, Y.; Bao, Q.; Liu, Z.; He, G.; Wen, J.; Liu, Q.; Xu, Y.; Jin, Z.; Zhang, W. Development and Validation of a Hypoxia-Associated Prognostic Signature Related to Osteosarcoma Metastasis and Immune Infiltration. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 633607.
  131. Chen, H.; Fu, Y.; Feng, K.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, X.; Huang, H.; Chen, Y.; Wang, W.; Xu, Y.; Tian, H.; et al. Polydopamine-coated UiO-66 nanoparticles loaded with perfluorotributylamine/tirapazamine for hypoxia-activated osteosarcoma therapy. J. Nanobiotechnology 2021, 19, 298.
  132. He, G.; Nie, J.J.; Liu, X.; Ding, Z.; Luo, P.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, B.W.; Wang, R.; Liu, X.; Hai, Y.; et al. Zinc oxide nanoparticles inhibit osteosarcoma metastasis by downregulating β-catenin via HIF-1α/BNIP3/LC3B-mediated mitophagy pathway. Bioact. Mater. 2023, 19, 690–702.
  133. Zhao, T.-T.; Zhou, T.-J.; Zhang, C.; Liu, Y.-X.; Wang, W.-J.; Li, C.; Xing, L.; Jiang, H.-L. Hypoxia Inhibitor Combined with Chemotherapeutic Agents for Antitumor and Antimetastatic Efficacy against Osteosarcoma. Mol. Pharm. 2023, 20, 2612–2623.
  134. Han, T.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Liang, J.; Xia, C.; Yan, H. Comprehensive analysis of hypoxia-related genes for prognosis value, immune status, and therapy in osteosarcoma patients. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 1088732.
  135. Shen, S.; Xu, Y.; Gong, Z.; Yao, T.; Qiao, D.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Gao, J.; Ni, H.; Jin, Z.; et al. Positive Feedback Regulation of Circular RNA Hsa_circ_0000566 and HIF-1α promotes Osteosarcoma Progression and Glycolysis Metabolism. Aging Dis. 2023, 14, 529–547.
  136. Lu, D.; Liu, R.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Jiang, X.; Xu, J.; Su, A.; Hu, Z. FOXO3a-dependent up-regulation of HSP90 alleviates cisplatin-induced apoptosis by activating FUNDC1-mediated mitophagy in hypoxic osteosarcoma cells. Cell. Signal. 2023, 101, 110500.
  137. Zheng, C.; Li, R.; Zheng, S.; Fang, H.; Xu, M.; Zhong, L. The knockdown of lncRNA DLGAP1-AS2 suppresses osteosarcoma progression by inhibiting aerobic glycolysis via the miR-451a/HK2 axis. Cancer Sci. 2023. early view.
  138. Subasinghe, S.A.A.S.; Ortiz, C.J.; Romero, J.; Ward, C.L.; Sertage, A.G.; Kurenbekova, L.; Yustein, J.T.; Pautler, R.G.; Allen, M.J. Toward quantification of hypoxia using fluorinated EuII/III-containing ratiometric probes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e2220891120.
  139. Hinton, K.; Kirk, A.; Paul, P.; Persad, S. Regulation of the Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition in Osteosarcoma. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 398.
  140. Gong, H.; Tao, Y.; Xiao, S.; Li, X.; Fang, K.; Wen, J.; Zeng, M.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Y. Identification of an EMT-related gene-based prognostic signature in osteosarcoma. Cancer Med. 2023, 12, 12912–12928.
  141. Yiqi, Z.; Ziyun, L.; Qin, F.; Xingli, W.; Liyu, Y. Identification of 9-Gene Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Related Signature of Osteosarcoma by Integrating Multi Cohorts. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2020, 19, 1533033820980769.
  142. Peng, Y.X.; Yu, B.; Qin, H.; Xue, L.; Liang, Y.J.; Quan, Z.X. EMT-related gene expression is positively correlated with immunity and may be derived from stromal cells in osteosarcoma. PeerJ 2020, 8, e8489.
  143. Yu, X.; Yustein, J.T.; Xu, J. Research models and mesenchymal/epithelial plasticity of osteosarcoma. Cell Biosci. 2021, 11, 94.
  144. Wushou, A.; Hou, J.; Zhao, Y.J.; Shao, Z.M. Twist-1 up-regulation in carcinoma correlates to poor survival. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 21621–21630.
  145. Jin, C.; Feng, Y.; Ni, Y.; Shan, Z. MicroRNA-610 suppresses osteosarcoma oncogenicity via targeting TWIST1 expression. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 56174–56184.
  146. Ye, F.; Tian, L.; Zhou, Q.; Feng, D. LncRNA FER1L4 induces apoptosis and suppresses EMT and the activation of PI3K/AKT pathway in osteosarcoma cells via inhibiting miR-18a-5p to promote SOCS5. Gene 2019, 721, 144093.
  147. Zhu, S.T.; Wang, X.; Wang, J.Y.; Xi, G.H.; Liu, Y. Downregulation of miR-22 Contributes to Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Osteosarcoma by Targeting Twist1. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 406.
  148. Tang, G.; Liu, L.; Xiao, Z.; Wen, S.; Chen, L.; Yang, P. CircRAB3IP upregulates twist family BHLH transcription factor (TWIST1) to promote osteosarcoma progression by sponging miR-580-3p. Bioengineered 2021, 12, 3385–3397.
  149. Jia, J.; Yin, P.; Han, G.; Xu, M.; Wang, W.; Bi, W. MicroRNA-300 decreases cell viability, inhibits migration and promotes apoptosis of osteosarcoma cells via downregulation of Twist1. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017, 16, 3613–3618.
  150. Zhou, Y.; Huang, Z.; Wu, S.; Zang, X.; Liu, M.; Shi, J. miR-33a is up-regulated in chemoresistant osteosarcoma and promotes osteosarcoma cell resistance to cisplatin by down-regulating TWIST. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014, 33, 12.
  151. Chen, J.; Xia, J.; Yu, Y.L.; Wang, S.Q.; Wei, Y.B.; Chen, F.Y.; Huang, G.Y.; Shi, J.S. HDAC5 promotes osteosarcoma progression by upregulation of Twist 1 expression. Tumour Biol. 2014, 35, 1383–1387.
  152. Ruh, M.; Stemmler, M.P.; Frisch, I.; Fuchs, K.; van Roey, R.; Kleemann, J.; Roas, M.; Schuhwerk, H.; Eccles, R.L.; Agaimy, A.; et al. The EMT transcription factor ZEB1 blocks osteoblastic differentiation in bone development and osteosarcoma. J. Pathol. 2021, 254, 199–211.
  153. Shen, A.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, H.; Xu, R.; Huang, G. Overexpression of ZEB1 relates to metastasis and invasion in osteosarcoma. J. Surg. Oncol. 2012, 105, 830–834.
  154. Yao, H.; Hou, G.; Wang, Q.Y.; Xu, W.B.; Zhao, H.Q.; Xu, Y.C. LncRNA SPRY4-IT1 promotes progression of osteosarcoma by regulating ZEB1 and ZEB2 expression through sponging of miR-101 activity. Int. J. Oncol. 2020, 56, 85–100.
  155. Yang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Jiang, X.; Shen, A. Transcription factor Snai1-1 induces osteosarcoma invasion and metastasis by inhibiting E-cadherin expression. Oncol. Lett. 2014, 8, 193–197.
  156. Tian, Y.; Liu, R.; Hou, X.; Gao, Z.; Liu, X.; Zhang, W. SIRT2 promotes the viability, invasion and metastasis of osteosarcoma cells by inhibiting the degradation of Snail. Cell Death Dis. 2022, 13, 935.
  157. Jiang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Song, C.; Deng, H.; Yang, R.; Zhou, L.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, Q. Glaucocalyxin A reverses EMT and TGF-β1-induced EMT by inhibiting TGF-β1/Smad2/3 signaling pathway in osteosarcoma. Chem.-Biol. Interact. 2019, 307, 158–166.
  158. Ma, L.; Xue, W.; Ma, X. GATA3 is downregulated in osteosarcoma and facilitates EMT as well as migration through regulation of slug. OncoTargets Ther. 2018, 11, 7579–7589.
  159. Dixon, S.J.; Lemberg, K.M.; Lamprecht, M.R.; Skouta, R.; Zaitsev, E.M.; Gleason, C.E.; Patel, D.N.; Bauer, A.J.; Cantley, A.M.; Yang, W.S.; et al. Ferroptosis: An iron-dependent form of nonapoptotic cell death. Cell 2012, 149, 1060–1072.
  160. Jiang, X.; Stockwell, B.R.; Conrad, M. Ferroptosis: Mechanisms, biology and role in disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2021, 22, 266–282.
  161. Dachert, J.; Ehrenfeld, V.; Habermann, K.; Dolgikh, N.; Fulda, S. Targeting ferroptosis in rhabdomyosarcoma cells. Int. J. Cancer 2020, 146, 510–520.
  162. Zhao, J.; Zhao, Y.; Ma, X.; Zhang, B.; Feng, H. Targeting ferroptosis in osteosarcoma. J. Bone Oncol. 2021, 30, 100380.
  163. Liu, Q.; Wang, K. The induction of ferroptosis by impairing STAT3/Nrf2/GPx4 signaling enhances the sensitivity of osteosarcoma cells to cisplatin. Cell Biol. Int. 2019, 43, 1245–1256.
  164. Lei, T.; Qian, H.; Lei, P.; Hu, Y. Ferroptosis-related gene signature associates with immunity and predicts prognosis accurately in patients with osteosarcoma. Cancer Sci. 2021, 112, 4785–4798.
  165. Li, G.; Lei, J.; Xu, D.; Yu, W.; Bai, J.; Wu, G. Integrative analyses of ferroptosis and immune related biomarkers and the osteosarcoma associated mechanisms. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 5770.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Oncology
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Bikesh K. Nirala
,
Taku Yamamichi
,
D. Isabel Petrescu
,
Tasnuva N. Shafin
,
Jason T. Yustein
View Times: 131
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 01 Nov 2023
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Video Production Service
    Feedback