Micro-Raman Spectroscopy for Graphene Characterization

Version	Summary	Created by	Modification	Content Size	Created at	Operation
1		Grazia Giuseppina Politano	--	1650	2023-10-11 15:27:57	\|
2	Reference format revised.	Lindsay Dong	+ 78 word(s)	1728	2023-10-16 03:09:10	\|

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/cryst13091357

There has been growing interest in combining the unique properties of graphene-based materials with silver nanostructures, aiming for their utilization in the fields of plasmonics and metamaterials applications. Silver nanoparticles and nanostructures, with localized surface plasmonic resonance spanning from the visible to the near-infrared range, find utility in various applications, particularly in surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS). Materials based on graphene, for instance, graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (RGO), have demonstrated their potential as SERS substrates by generating strong chemical enhancement.

graphene graphene oxide micro-Raman

1. Introduction

Graphene exhibits special physical and electrical properties. It demonstrates broad light absorption, a linear dispersion band structure, significant charge-carrier mobility, and remarkable optical qualities. For instance, it offers high transparency within the visible spectrum ^[1], photo-response capabilities extending into the Terahertz frequency range, and customizable infrared optical absorbance ^[2]. Furthermore, its unique band structure and electron transport properties make it a promising candidate for developing high-performance modulators, sources, and detectors designed for operation in the infrared (IR) segment of the electromagnetic spectrum ^[3]. The optical characteristics of graphene films vary significantly depending on the fabrication method used, whether it is exfoliation or chemical vapor deposition (CVD) ^[4]. CVD, a method intended for producing high-quality few-layer graphene, has been successfully applied in ultradense photonic, optoelectronic, and electronic devices, as described in previous research ^[5]^[6].

2. Structure of Graphene, Graphene Oxide, and Reduced Graphene Oxide

Graphene consists of a single layer of carbon atoms arranged in a hexagonal lattice and originates from graphite ^[7]. Its unique properties include sp² hybridization and an incredibly slim atomic thickness measuring 0.345 nm ^[8]. A perfect graphene sheet has a flat structure with minor ripples, and its carbon atoms form a trigonal pattern ^[9]. Various methods have been developed to fabricate graphene, including CVD ^[10], epitaxial growth ^[11], micromechanical exfoliation ^[12], and epitaxial growth on insulating surfaces like SiC ^[13]. These techniques have significantly advanced research on monolayer graphene.

GO, on the other hand, is a derivative of graphene that contains oxygen-functional groups like epoxide, carbonyl, carboxyl, and hydroxy ^[14]. These groups render GO sheets water-soluble; their removal leads to flocculation and precipitation. GO features a complex structure with oxygen-rich domains interspersed among areas where carbon atoms retain their sp² hybridization ^[15].

Graphite and graphite oxide, although related, have distinct properties ^[16]. Graphite oxide is created by oxidizing graphite, which introduces oxygen functionalities that increase the distance between layers and make the material water-dispersible ^[17]. Exfoliation of graphite oxide through sonication in water results in the formation of GO ^[18]. The primary difference between graphite oxide and GO is in the number of layers: graphite oxide is multilayered, while GO dispersions mainly consist of monolayer flakes, with some multilayer flakes present ^[19].

Zeta potential measurements show that GO sheets in water carry negative charges ^[20], which leads to electrostatic repulsion among the sheets and results in a stable aqueous suspension. The utilization of organic compounds in chemically altering GO sheets can lead to the attainment of uniform dispersions in organic solvents ^[21].

A widely employed technique for synthesizing GO is the adapted Hummers method, which relies on oxidizing graphite by using a blend of concentrated sulfuric acid, sodium nitrate, and potassium permanganate ^[22]. While the exact chemical arrangement of GO remains not entirely comprehended, it is considered partially amorphous, with proposed structural models consisting of hydroxyl and epoxy functional groups ^[23].

Various techniques, such as drop-casting ^[24], dip-coating ^[25], spraying ^[26], spin-coating ^[27], and electrophoresis ^[28], can be used to deposit GO sheets as thin films on different substrates.

GO and graphene have also been extensively used to obtain composite coatings, enhancing the wear behavior and other mechanical properties of the substrate. For example, in Ref. ^[29], an enhanced wear behavior in nickel/graphene composite coatings is reported. Similarly, in Ref. ^[30], the properties of nickel-based composite coatings modified with GO are investigated.

The electrical properties of GO sheets differ significantly from those of pristine graphene. As a consequence, films composed of GO tend to manifest resistance values that commonly exceed 10¹² Ω/sq ^[31].

A partial reduction of GO can yield sheets resembling graphene by eliminating oxygen-related groups ^[32]. Chemical reduction methods typically use reducing agents such as hydrazine or involve creating highly alkaline conditions ^[33]. Ascorbic acid has emerged as a promising alternative to hydrazine ^[34]. The thermal reduction process for GO is commonly conducted at temperatures exceeding 200 °C within inert or reducing surroundings, with an enhanced efficacy observed at elevated temperatures ^[35].

These reduced GO sheets exhibit reduced hydrophilicity and display a propensity to aggregate within the solution, stemming from the absence of oxygenated functionalities ^[36]. The chemical reduction of GO partially restores its conductivity ^[37], yet it remains significantly inferior by several orders of magnitude when compared to the pristine graphene counterpart. The degree of this reduction determines the conductivity of the resulting RGO, which can range from 0.05 to 500 S/cm and is intricately linked to the proportion of graphitic (sp²) to oxidized (sp³) zones ^[38].

3. State of the Art

Raman spectroscopy has become an indispensable tool for comprehensively characterizing graphene and its derivatives like GO and RGO ^[39]^[40]. The technique’s ability to identify characteristic vibrational modes in materials offers an understanding of the structural and chemical compositions of these graphene-based materials ^[41]. For example, Neeraj Sharma and colleagues ^[42] showed that the presence or absence of functional groups significantly alters the material’s vibrational modes, evident from changes in the Raman spectra ^[41]. This is particularly valuable for researchers aiming to tailor the properties of graphene-based materials for specific applications, such as optoelectronics or sensing.

The G and D peaks in the Raman spectra serve as critical markers for the structural integrity and chemical modifications of graphene-based materials ^[39]. The G peak, a fundamental graphitic peak, is ubiquitous in all hexagonal graphitic structures, while the D peak arises due to imperfections and impurities introduced by functional groups ^[39].

Jiang-Bin Wu and colleagues ^[43] further elaborate on how Raman spectroscopy can study the impact of various external factors like doping agents, mechanical forces, and environmental conditions on single-layer graphene. Additionally, the authors provide insights into the identification of material defects and layer counts through Raman spectral features.

K. Kanishka H. De Silva et al. ^[44] further extend this discussion by emphasizing the challenges posed by the abundant lattice defects in GO and RGO. Their work provides new insights into the optical visibility and Raman signals of these materials when deposited on different Si-based substrates. They found that dielectric substrates with lower reflectance in the visible range offer better optical contrast and more intense Raman signals. This advancement is significant because it implies that substrate choice can affect the quality of Raman spectroscopic data and, consequently, our understanding of the material’s structural and optical properties. Moreover, De Silva et al. ^[44] introduced the importance of the D’ band in the Raman spectra for a more comprehensive understanding of the structural variations in monolayer flakes of GO and RGO.

4. Micro-Raman Spectroscopy for Graphene Characterization

Raman spectroscopy is a critical tool for characterizing the properties of graphene, especially in the development of graphene-based field-effect transistors (FETs). By identifying the doping levels, Raman spectroscopy enables the fine-tuning of the electronic properties of these transistors, directly affecting their speed and energy efficiency. Additionally, the technique provides valuable data on heat generation and dissipation within the FETs, contributing to their long-term stability and performance ^[45]^[46]^[47]^[48].

The technique also plays a significant role in advancing energy storage devices. Specifically, it helps researchers understand the distortion of electrode material during charge and discharge processes. This understanding is vital for enhancing both the efficiency and longevity of batteries and other energy storage systems based on graphene ^[49].

In optoelectronic applications like solar cells and organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) ^[50], graphene’s high optical transparency, electrical conductivity, and mechanical flexibility make it a material of choice. Raman spectroscopy aids in the identification of interlayer coupling and the number of graphene layers in these devices, which is crucial for optimizing their performance.

Moreover, in nanoelectromechanical systems (NEMS), the technique is used to probe the local stress within multilayer graphene cantilevers ^[51].

Raman spectroscopy is also instrumental in the study of van der Waals 2D heterostructure devices, such as those combining graphene and MoS₂ ^[52]. The method allows for the in situ examination of charge transfer within these heterostructures, providing essential insights into the electronic interplay between the various layers.

While the applications of Raman spectroscopy in areas like FETs, energy storage, and optoelectronics are well-established, its potential in sensing technologies is gaining increasing attention ^[53].

It is worth noting that MoS₂, a prominent member of the transition metal dichalcogenides family, has demonstrated significant applicability across various technological domains. Notably, MoS₂ has been studied for its role as a spin-valley filter, as outlined in ^[54]. Additionally, its intrinsic optoelectronic characteristics make it suitable for phototransistor devices, as detailed in ^[55]. MoS₂ has also been explored for its potential in rectifying contacts, as reported in ^[56], and in tunneling field-effect transistors, as described in ^[57].

The study of transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers (MX₂), including MoS₂, has revealed the importance of metal-induced gap states (MIGS) in spin-valley filters ^[54]. These MIGS are predicted to mediate valley- and spin-resolved charge transport near the ideal electrode/MX₂ interface, thus initiating filtering. This insight is particularly crucial when the channel length is diminished as MIGS begin to govern the overall valley-spin transport in the tunneling regime. The findings offer design guidelines for efficient valley-spin filter devices, which could revolutionize information processing technologies.

In addition to its role in valley-spin filtering, MoS₂ has been extensively studied for its intrinsic optoelectronic characteristics ^[55]. Raman spectroscopy serves as a vital tool for understanding these properties, especially when MoS₂ is integrated into functional devices like phototransistors. Utilizing a fully transparent van der Waals heterostructure, researchers have been able to reveal the intrinsic photoresponsivity characteristics of monolayer MoS₂, including its internal responsivity and quantum efficiency.

Similarly, transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs), particularly MoS₂, have garnered attention for their semiconducting applications at the nanoscale. These materials exhibit direct band gaps and high charge mobilities, making them ideal for use in nanoscale devices. One of the critical aspects of TMDs is the understanding of Schottky barrier heights (SBHs) ^[56], which are crucial for efficient charge injection into these semiconductors. These theoretical models help in estimating the charge neutrality levels and canonical Schottky barrier heights, which are pivotal for the device’s performance.

Further exploring the potential of MoS₂, tunneling field-effect transistors (TFETs) using monolayer MoS₂ as the channel have emerged as promising contenders for low-energy electronics. These MoS₂-TFETs ^[57] are compatible with silicon CMOS technology and exhibit a lower off-state leakage current and subthreshold swing compared to traditional MOSFETs.

References

Obraztsova, E.D.; Rybin, M.G.; Obraztsov, P.A. 7—Optical properties of graphene. In Woodhead Publishing Series in Electronic and Optical Materials; Skakalova, V., Kaiser, A.B.B.T.-G., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2021; pp. 133–142. ISBN 978-0-08-102848-3.
Jafari, B.; Gholizadeh, E.; Golmohammadi, S.; Ebadzadeh, M.; Soofi, H.; Aghili, S. An Innovative method for adjustable broadband THz to Mid-IR optical modulator using Graphene Gratings surface plasmon Fabry–Perot resonances with low insertion loss, high speed and modulation depth. Opt. Commun. 2023, 530, 129200.
Rogalski, A. Graphene-based materials in the infrared and terahertz detector families: A tutorial. Adv. Opt. Photonics 2019, 11, 314–379.
Rao, C.N.R.; Biswas, K.; Subrahmanyam, K.S.; Govindaraj, A. Graphene, the new nanocarbon. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 2457–2469.
Mbayachi, V.B.; Ndayiragije, E.; Sammani, T.; Taj, S.; Mbuta, E.R.; Khan, A. ullah Graphene synthesis, characterization and its applications: A review. Results Chem. 2021, 3, 100163.
Chen, X.; Zhang, L.; Chen, S. Large area CVD growth of graphene. Synth. Met. 2015, 210, 95–108.
Bruna, M.; Ott, A.K.; Ijäs, M.; Yoon, D.; Sassi, U.; Ferrari, A.C. Doping Dependence of the Raman Spectrum of Defected Graphene. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 7432–7441.
Bonaccorso, F.; Sun, Z.; Hasan, T.; Ferrari, A.C. Graphene photonics and optoelectronics. Nat. Photonics 2010, 4, 611.
Katsnelson, M.I. Graphene: Carbon in two dimensions. Mater Today 2007, 10, 20.
Fang, W.; Song, Y.; Hsu, A.L.; Kong, J. A review of large-area bilayer graphene synthesis by chemical vapor deposition. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 20335.
Yu, X.Z.; Hwang, C.G.; Jozwiak, C.M.; Köhl, A.; Schmid, A.K.; Lanzara, A. New synthesis method for the growth of epitaxial graphene. J. Electron Spectros. Relat. Phenomena 2011, 184, 100–106.
Sinclair, R.C.; Suter, J.L.; Coveney, P. V Micromechanical exfoliation of graphene on the atomistic scale. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 5716–5722.
Mishra, N.; Boeckl, J.; Motta, N.; Iacopi, F. Graphene growth on silicon carbide: A review. Phys. Status Solidi 2016, 213, 2277–2289.
Thakur, S.; Karak, N. Alternative methods and nature-based reagents for the reduction of graphene oxide: A review. Carbon N. Y. 2015, 94, 224–242.
Pei, S.; Cheng, H.-M. The reduction of graphene oxide. Carbon N. Y. 2012, 50, 3210–3228.
Boukhvalov, D.W.; Katsnelson, M.I. Modeling of Graphite Oxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 10697–10701.
Nakajima, T.; Matsuo, Y. Formation process and structure of graphite oxide. Carbon N. Y. 1994, 32, 469–475.
Smirnov, V.A.; Arbuzov, A.A.; Shul’ga, Y.M.; Baskakov, S.A.; Martynenko, V.M.; Muradyan, V.E.; Kresova, E.I. Photoreduction of graphite oxide. High Energy Chem. 2011, 45, 57–61.
Petridis, L.V.; Kokkinos, N.C.; Mitropoulos, A.C.; Kyzas, G.Z. Chapter 8—Graphene aerogels for oil absorption. In Advanced Low-Cost Separation Techniques in Interface Science; Kyzas, G.Z., Mitropoulos, A.C., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; Volume 30, pp. 173–197. ISBN 1573-4285.
Konkena, B.; Vasudevan, S. Understanding Aqueous Dispersibility of Graphene Oxide and Reduced Graphene Oxide through pKa Measurements. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3, 867–872.
Paredes, J.I.; Villar-Rodil, S.; Martínez-Alonso, A.; Tascón, J.M.D. Graphene Oxide Dispersions in Organic Solvents. Langmuir 2008, 24, 10560–10564.
Yu, H.; Zhang, B.; Bulin, C.; Li, R.; Xing, R. High-efficient Synthesis of Graphene Oxide Based on Improved Hummers Method. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 36143.
Dreyer, D.R.; Park, S.; Bielawski, C.W.; Ruoff, R.S. The chemistry of graphene oxide. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 228–240.
Zhao, C.; Xing, L.; Xiang, J.; Cui, L.; Jiao, J.; Sai, H.; Li, Z.; Li, F. Formation of uniform reduced graphene oxide films on modified PET substrates using drop-casting method. Particuology 2014, 17, 66–73.
Sun, H.B.; Yang, J.; Zhou, Y.Z.; Zhao, N.; Li, D. Preparation of reduced graphene oxide films by dip coating technique and their electrical conductivity. Mater. Technol. 2014, 29, 14–20.
Nasiłowska, B.; Bogdanowicz, Z.; Hińcza, K.; Mierczyk, Z.; Góźdź, S.; Djas, M.; Kowiorski, K.; Bombalska, A.; Kowalik, A. Graphene Oxide Aerosol Deposition and its Influence on Cancer Cells. Preliminary Results. Materials 2020, 13, 4464.
Komarov, I.A.; Danilova, E.A.; Denisenko, E.I.; Peretiyagin, V.G.; Rabchinskii, M.K. Spin-coating deposition of graphene oxide from mixed water-organic suspensions. Fuller. Nanotub. Carbon Nanostruct. 2022, 30, 146–151.
Marcin Behunová, D.; Gallios, G.; Girman, V.; Kolev, H.; Kaňuchová, M.; Dolinská, S.; Václavíková, M. Electrophoretic Deposition of Graphene Oxide on Stainless Steel Substrate. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1779.
Li, X.; Shen, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, L.; Nie, C. Wear behavior of electrodeposited nickel/graphene composite coating. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2021, 119, 108589.
Tseluikin, V.; Dzhumieva, A.; Tikhonov, D.; Yakovlev, A.; Strilets, A.; Tribis, A.; Lopukhova, M. Pulsed Electrodeposition and Properties of Nickel-Based Composite Coatings Modified with Graphene Oxide. Coatings 2022, 12, 656.
Ray, S.C. Applications of Graphene and Graphene-Oxide based Nanomaterials. In Applications of Graphene and Graphene-Oxide Based Nanomaterials; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 1–84.
Tkachev, S.V.; Buslaeva, E.Y.; Naumkin, A.V.; Kotova, S.L.; Laure, I.V.; Gubin, S.P. Reduced graphene oxide. Inorg. Mater. 2012, 48, 796–802.
Park, S.; An, J.; Potts, J.R.; Velamakanni, A.; Murali, S.; Ruoff, R.S. Hydrazine-reduction of graphite-and graphene oxide. Carbon N. Y. 2011, 49, 3019–3023.
Fernández-Merino, M.J.; Guardia, L.; Paredes, J.I.; Villar-Rodil, S.; Solís-Fernández, P.; Martínez-Alonso, A.; Tascón, J.M.D. Vitamin C Is an Ideal Substitute for Hydrazine in the Reduction of Graphene Oxide Suspensions. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 6426–6432.
Jung, I.; Dikin, D.A.; Piner, R.D.; Ruoff, R.S. Tunable Electrical Conductivity of Individual Graphene Oxide Sheets Reduced at “Low” Temperatures. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 4283–4287.
Stankovich, S.; Dikin, D.A.; Piner, R.D.; Kohlhaas, K.A.; Kleinhammes, A.; Jia, Y.; Wu, Y.; Nguyen, S.T.; Ruoff, R.S. Synthesis of graphene-based nanosheets via chemical reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide. Carbon N. Y. 2007, 45, 1558–1565.
Sadhukhan, S.; Ghosh, T.K.; Rana, D.; Roy, I.; Bhattacharyya, A.; Sarkar, G.; Chakraborty, M.; Chattopadhyay, D. Studies on synthesis of reduced graphene oxide (RGO) via green route and its electrical property. Mater. Res. Bull. 2016, 79, 41–51.
Chua, C.K.; Pumera, M. Chemical reduction of graphene oxide: A synthetic chemistry viewpoint. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 291–312.
Ferrari, A.C. Raman spectroscopy of graphene and graphite: Disorder, electron–phonon coupling, doping and nonadiabatic effects. Solid State Commun. 2007, 143, 47–57.
Ferrari, A.C.; Meyer, J.C.; Scardaci, V.; Casiraghi, C.; Lazzeri, M.; Mauri, F.; Piscanec, S.; Jiang, D.; Novoselov, K.S.; Roth, S.; et al. Raman Spectrum of Graphene and Graphene Layers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97, 187401.
Das, A.; Pisana, S.; Chakraborty, B.; Piscanec, S.; Saha, S.K.; Waghmare, U.V.; Novoselov, K.S.; Krishnamurthy, H.R.; Geim, A.K.; Ferrari, A.C.; et al. Monitoring dopants by Raman scattering in an electrochemically top-gated graphene transistor. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3, 210–215.
Sharma, N.; Tomar, S.; Shkir, M.; Kant Choubey, R.; Singh, A. Study of Optical and Electrical Properties of Graphene Oxide. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 36, 730–735.
Wu, J.-B.; Lin, M.-L.; Cong, X.; Liu, H.-N.; Tan, P.-H. Raman spectroscopy of graphene-based materials and its applications in related devices. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 1822–1873.
De Silva, K.K.H.; Viswanath, P.; Rao, V.K.; Suzuki, S.; Yoshimura, M. New Insight into the Characterization of Graphene Oxide and Reduced Graphene Oxide Monolayer Flakes on Si-Based Substrates by Optical Microscopy and Raman Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 2021, 125, 7791–7798.
Yan, Y.; Peng, S.; Jin, Z.; Zhang, D.; Shi, J. Recovering the Intrinsic Electrical Property of a Graphene Field-Effect Transistor by Interface Cleaning Technology. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2023, 5, 3113–3119.
Kim, S.; Kim, B.; Park, S.; Chang, W.S.; Kang, H.; Kim, S.; Lee, H.; Kim, S. Hysteretic behavior of all CVD h-BN/graphene/h-BN heterostructure field-effect transistors by interfacial charge trap. Surf. Interfaces 2023, 36, 102615.
Chaudhary, M.; Xin, C.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, D.; Radtke, G.; Xu, X.; Billot, L.; Tripon-Canseliet, C.; Chen, Z. Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Quantum Dots on Graphene for Field-Effect Transistor Optoelectronic Memories. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2023, 9, 2300159.
Khan, M.F.; Elahi, E.; Hassan, N.U.; Rehman, M.A.; Khalil, H.M.W.; Khan, M.A.; Rehman, S.; Hao, A.; Noh, H.; Khan, K.; et al. Bipolar Photoresponse of a Graphene Field-Effect Transistor Induced by Photochemical Reactions. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2023.
Vignesh, G.; Devendran, P.; Nallamuthu, N.; Sudhahar, S.; Kumar, P.S.; Kumar, M.K. Effects of nitrogen, sulphur, and temperature treatments on the spectral, structural, and electrochemical characteristics of graphene oxide for energy storage applications. Carbon Trends 2023, 11, 100262.
Zhang, D.; Du, J.; Zhang, W.; Tong, B.; Sun, Y.; Zhao, T.-Y.; Ma, L.-P.; Sun, D.-M.; Cheng, H.-M.; Ren, W. Carrier Transport Regulation of Pixel Graphene Transparent Electrodes for Active-Matrix Organic Light-Emitting Diode Display. Small 2023, 2302920.
Fan, X.; Smith, A.D.; Forsberg, F.; Wagner, S.; Schröder, S.; Akbari, S.S.A.; Fischer, A.C.; Villanueva, L.G.; Östling, M.; Lemme, M.C.; et al. Manufacture and characterization of graphene membranes with suspended silicon proof masses for MEMS and NEMS applications. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 2020, 6, 17.
Zhang, M.; Han, N.; Zhang, J.; Wang, J.; Chen, X.; Zhao, J.; Gan, X. Emergent second-harmonic generation in van der Waals heterostructure of bilayer MoS2 and monolayer graphene. Sci. Adv. 2023, 9, eadf4571.
Thakkar, S.; De Luca, L.; Gaspa, S.; Mariani, A.; Garroni, S.; Iacomini, A.; Stagi, L.; Innocenzi, P.; Malfatti, L. Comparative Evaluation of Graphene Nanostructures in GERS Platforms for Pesticide Detection. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 5670–5678.
Szczęśniak, D.; Kais, S. Gap states and valley-spin filtering in transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers. Phys. Rev. B 2020, 101, 115423.
Pak, J.; Lee, I.; Cho, K.; Kim, J.-K.; Jeong, H.; Hwang, W.-T.; Ahn, G.H.; Kang, K.; Yu, W.J.; Javey, A.; et al. Intrinsic Optoelectronic Characteristics of MoS2 Phototransistors via a Fully Transparent van der Waals Heterostructure. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 9638–9646.
Szczęśniak, D.; Hoehn, R.D.; Kais, S. Canonical Schottky barrier heights of transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers in contact with a metal. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 97, 195315.
Lan, Y.-W.; Torres, C.M., Jr.; Tsai, S.-H.; Zhu, X.; Shi, Y.; Li, M.-Y.; Li, L.-J.; Yeh, W.-K.; Wang, K.L. Atomic-Monolayer MoS2 Band-to-Band Tunneling Field-Effect Transistor. Small 2016, 12, 5676–5683.

© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Upload a video for this entry

Information

Subjects: Physics, Atomic, Molecular & Chemical

Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :

Grazia Giuseppina Politano

Carlo Versace

View Times: 202

Update Date: 16 Oct 2023

Table of Contents

Video Upload Options

Confirm