Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 -- 1109 2023-07-15 06:28:11 |
2 format correct Meta information modification 1109 2023-07-17 04:25:09 | |
3 format correct Meta information modification 1109 2023-07-17 10:38:51 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?


Are you sure to Delete?
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Sudarshan, S.B.; Arunkumar, G. Power Quality Due to Electric Vehicles Charging. Encyclopedia. Available online: (accessed on 14 June 2024).
Sudarshan SB, Arunkumar G. Power Quality Due to Electric Vehicles Charging. Encyclopedia. Available at: Accessed June 14, 2024.
Sudarshan, Srinath Belakavadi, Gopal Arunkumar. "Power Quality Due to Electric Vehicles Charging" Encyclopedia, (accessed June 14, 2024).
Sudarshan, S.B., & Arunkumar, G. (2023, July 15). Power Quality Due to Electric Vehicles Charging. In Encyclopedia.
Sudarshan, Srinath Belakavadi and Gopal Arunkumar. "Power Quality Due to Electric Vehicles Charging." Encyclopedia. Web. 15 July, 2023.
Power Quality Due to Electric Vehicles Charging

The transportation industry is transitioning from conventional Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles (ICVs) to Electric Vehicles (EVs) due to the depletion of fossil fuels and the rise in non-traditional energy sources. EVs are emerging as the new leaders in the industry. The supply systems in the world are invariably AC systems. This necessitates using an AC-DC converter in the battery-charging system. With grid connection, several important power quality parameters need to be considered. The power systems are usually designed keeping in mind the increase of load in the future.

EV battery charging lithium-ion battery charging Power Quality

1. Power Factor Correction

PFC can be done using two [1] methods: (a) passive PFC and (b) active PFC. The passive method uses passive components such as inductors and capacitors to filter out the harmonics. The passive method is suitable for low-power applications (less than 100 W) since it leads to lower efficiency, high cost, and weight due to the size of line-frequency inductors and capacitors. On the other hand, active PFC methods use switching regulators to correct the wave shape to obtain sinusoidal grid current at unity power factor. This method is complex but is suited for high power levels. Active PFC can be done using converters that operate in continuous conduction mode (CCM), critical conduction mode (CrCM), and discontinuous conduction mode (DCM).
The general requirements of a PFC AC-DC converter topology include a simple power stage with a low number of components, less distortions in the input current, and the ability to achieve a near-unity power factor. Kolar et al. [2] and Friedli et al. [3] have provided an exhaustive review of the various topologies of PFC rectifiers. Conventional Boost PFC Rectifiers (CBRs) operating in CCM are among the most popular PFC topologies [4]. Integrated PFC controllers such as NCP1650 by ON Semiconductors [5] also work as a CBR. With Silicon Carbide (SiC) and Gallium Nitride (GaN) MOSFETs and diodes, the issue of output diode reverse recovery is mitigated [6]. The design of the memory elements of the CBR is the same as that of a conventional boost converter. In addition to the CBR, dual boost bridge-less PFC rectifiers [7][8][9][10][11][12], totem-pole bridge-less PFC rectifiers [13][14][15][16], and interleaved boost PFC rectifiers [17] are more commonly used [18] in several products that need PFC. On the three-phase system side, Vienna rectifiers have become very popular [19] since they have inherent PFC capability. Several control techniques can be used to achieve a unity power factor. Examples of control strategies include hysteresis control [20][21], average and peak current mode controls [22][23][24][25][26], model predictive control [27], sliding controller [28], and one-cycle control [29][30].

2. Harmonics and THD

EV battery charging systems are made of multiple power electronic converters and analog electronic systems. These are non-linear loads to the grid and hence cause harmonics in the grid current. The harmonics will be very significant when multiple vehicles are being charged at the same time [31]. Not only will the harmonic pollution of the grid current be higher in that part of the power system, but it will also reflect on all its connected systems and cause distortion in those parts. The presence of harmonics affects the operation of all the connected equipment and can also cause failures with considerable financial implications. EV charging can cause unbalance in the power system. Due to the unbalance, negative sequence components can be produced, producing a second-order harmonic ripple in the DC link voltage. This causes distortions in the grid input currents. Equation (1) can be used to explain the effects of harmonics [32] on the DC-link. The presence of even-order harmonics on the DC-grid side will cause the generation of odd-harmonics on the grid-side, leading to power quality issues. In Equation (1), α represents the negative sequence components, and Idc represents the DC current.
V d c = 3 4 C I d c + I 2 4 π f s i n ( 4 π f t α 2 ) + I 4 8 π f s i n ( 8 π f t α 4 ) + I 6 12 π f s i n ( 12 π f t α 6 ) + I 8 16 π f s i n ( 16 π f t α 8 ) + I 12 24 π f s i n ( 24 π f t α 12 )
Other effects of harmonics on the various components of the power system are well known, and their solutions have been investigated for years. PFC converters are to be controlled such that the harmonics are mitigated well and the THD levels are within the permissible limits. In addition, strategic placement and optimal sizing of variable passive filters can also help in harmonic reduction. Alame et al. [33] have comprehensively analyzed the effects of harmonics due to EV charging on the various components of a distribution system. The authors have explained transformer loss modeling, temperature rise modeling, and lifetime modeling. A sample case study on a 1500 kVA distribution transformer has been provided to show that the percentage of harmonic currents increased with an increase in the battery state of charge. Further, the impact of EV charging on the distribution system has been analyzed by considering the IEEE 33-bus system charging four EVs at different buses using PV-based distributed generation units. The analysis has been performed using the decoupled harmonic power flow algorithm to obtain the effect on voltage quality and current THD. A centralized control flow has been proposed as an optimization problem to mitigate the effects of harmonics.

3. Other Detrimental Effects

Due to the diverse charging rates of EVs owing to slow, fast, and ultra-fast chargers, several negative effects can be observed. These include stability issues, unbalance, and overloading [32]. Dharmakeerthi et al. [34] have concluded that using fast charging stations can cause issues in the grid since they can significantly reduce the steady state voltage stability of the grid. In addition, the harmonics and inter-harmonics produced due to charging rates will also affect the power system’s critical components, such as transformers, breakers, cables, and meters. Alshareef and Morsi [35] have shown that fast charging stations can significantly affect and cause voltage flicker in distribution systems.
Despite these issues, EVs will be integral to our system since the advantages outweigh the limitations. Hence it is necessary to address these issues while designing a charging station. Nguyen et al. [31] have provided the topology of a photovoltaic inverter used as an active filter to mitigate power quality issues during simultaneous fast charging of five EV batteries. The proposed system models a bidirectional DC-DC converter acting as a charger and a DC-AC converter connected to the AC grid. Control structures for the control of both converters to implement harmonic mitigation have been explained, and the corresponding simulation results have been provided to validate the proposed scheme.
Once the AC power has been converted to DC and the power quality is maintained, a DC-DC converter is required to regulate the voltage, match the battery voltage level, and implement charging control. These DC-DC converters form a significant research area, specific to the simultaneous charging of multiple batteries.


  1. Monolithic Power. Power Factor Correction (PFC). Available online: (accessed on 3 December 2022).
  2. Kolar, J.W.; Friedli, T. The essence of three-phase PFC rectifier systems—Part I. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2012, 28, 176–198.
  3. Friedli, T.; Hartmann, M.; Kolar, J.W. The essence of three-phase PFC rectifier systems—Part II. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2013, 29, 543–560.
  4. Figueiredo, J.P.M.; Tofoli, F.L.; Silva, B.L.A. A review of single-phase PFC topologies based on the boost converter. In Proceedings of the 2010 9th IEEE/IAS International Conference on Industry Applications-INDUSCON 2010, São Paulo, Brazil, 8–10 November 2010; pp. 1–6.
  5. Semiconductor, O. Power Factor Correction Handbook; HBD853/D, Rev; Newark Electronics: Chicago, IL, USA, 2007; Volume 3.
  6. Efthymiou, L.; Camuso, G.; Longobardi, G.; Udrea, F.; Lin, E.; Chien, T.; Chen, M. Zero reverse recovery in SiC and GaN Schottky diodes: A comparison. In Proceedings of the 2016 28th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs (ISPSD), Prague, Czech Republic, 12–16 June 2016; pp. 71–74.
  7. Huber, L.; Jang, Y.; Jovanovic, M.M. Performance evaluation of bridgeless PFC boost rectifiers. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2008, 23, 1381–1390.
  8. Jang, Y.; Jovanovic, M.M. A bridgeless PFC boost rectifier with optimized magnetic utilization. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2009, 24, 85–93.
  9. Sharifi, S.; Monfared, M.; Babaei, M. Ferdowsi rectifiers—Single-phase buck-boost bridgeless PFC rectifiers with low semiconductor count. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2019, 67, 9206–9214.
  10. Lange, A.D.B.; Soeiro, T.B.; Ortmann, M.S.; Heldwein, M.L. Three-level single-phase bridgeless PFC rectifiers. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2014, 30, 2935–2949.
  11. Ge, K.; Liu, Q. Research on dual boost semi-bridgeless PFC converter. In Advances in Energy Materials and Environment Engineering; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2022; pp. 313–318.
  12. Babaei, M.; Monfared, M. High Step-Down Bridgeless Sepic/Cuk PFC Rectifiers with Improved Efficiency and Reduced Current Stress. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2022, 69, 9984–9991.
  13. Yu, Z.; Xia, Y.; Ayyanar, R. A simple ZVT auxiliary circuit for totem-pole bridgeless PFC rectifier. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2019, 55, 2868–2878.
  14. Huang, Q.; Ma, Q.; Liu, P.; Huang, A.Q.; de Rooij, M. 3kW four-level flying capacitor totem-pole bridgeless PFC rectifier with 200V GaN devices. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), Baltimore, MA, USA, 29 September–3 October 2019; pp. 81–88.
  15. Su, B.; Zhang, J.; Lu, Z. Totem-pole boost bridgeless PFC rectifier with simple zero-current detection and full-range ZVS operating at the boundary of DCM/CCM. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2010, 26, 427–435.
  16. Do, N.N.; Huang, B.S.; Phan, N.T.; Nguyen, T.T.; Wu, J.H.; Liu, Y.C.; Chiu, H.J. Design and Implementation of a Control Method for GaN-Based Totem-Pole Boost-Type PFC Rectifier in Energy Storage Systems. Energies 2020, 13, 6297.
  17. Kanimozhi, G.; Natrayan, L.; Angalaeswari, S.; Paramasivam, P. An Effective Charger for Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEV) with an Enhanced PFC Rectifier and ZVS-ZCS DC/DC High-Frequency Converter. J. Adv. Transp. 2022, 2022, 1–14.
  18. Power Factor Correction (PFC) Topology Comparison. 2017. Available online: (accessed on 3 December 2022).
  19. Vienna Rectifier-Based, Three-Phase Power Factor Correction (PFC) Reference Design Using C2000 MCU. 2017. Available online: (accessed on 3 December 2022).
  20. Kayisli, K. Hysteresis control of a boost pfc converter circuit. In Proceedings of the FAE Symposium, Lefke, Cyprus, 30 November–1 December 2006.
  21. Lekić-Vervoort, A.; Majstorović, M.; Ristić, L.; Stipanović, D. Hysteresis Control of the Pseudo Boost PFC Converter. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 29th International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE), Delft, The Netherlands, 17–19 June 2020; pp. 731–735.
  22. Choudhury, S. Average Current Mode Controlled Power Factor Correction Converter Using TMS320LF2407A; Texas Instruments Application Note SPRA902A; Texas Instruments: Dallas, TX, USA, 2005; pp. 1–14.
  23. Frgal, P. Average Current Mode Interleaved PFC Control. 2016. Available online: (accessed on 12 December 2022).
  24. Mahmud, K.; Tao, L. Power factor correction by PFC boost topology using average current control method. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Global High Tech Congress on Electronics, Singapore, 11–13 December 2013; pp. 16–20.
  25. Li, L.; Wang, W.; Lyu, D.; Min, R.; Tong, Q.; Peng, H.; Yu, J. Maximum efficiency average current controller based on a comprehensive charge rate model for DCM boost PFC converter. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2020, 36, 6046–6055.
  26. Abdel-Rahman, S.; Stückler, F.; Siu, K. PFC Boost Converter Design Guide 1200 W Design Example; Application Note; Infineon Technologies: Neubiberg, Germany, 2016.
  27. Bouafassa, A.; Rahmani, L.; Babes, B.; Bayindir, R. Experimental design of a finite state model predictive control for improving power factor of boost rectifier. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering (EEEIC), Rome, Italy, 10–13 June 2015; pp. 1556–1561.
  28. Bouafassa, A.; Rahmani, L.; Mekhilef, S. Design and real time implementation of single phase boost power factor correction converter. ISA Trans. 2015, 55, 267–274.
  29. Brown, R.; Soldano, M. One cycle control IC simplifies PFC designs. In Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, Austin, TX, USA, 6–10 March 2005; Volume 2, pp. 825–829.
  30. Brown, R.; Soldano, M. PFC Converter Design with IR1150 One Cycle Control IC; Application Note AN-1077; International Rectifier: El Segundo, CA, USA, 2005.
  31. Nguyen, V.L.; Tran-Quoc, T.; Bacha, S. Harmonic distortion mitigation for electric vehicle fast charging systems. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Grenoble Conference, Grenoble, France, 16–20 June 2013; pp. 1–6.
  32. Sharma, G.; Sood, V.K.; Alam, M.S.; Shariff, S.M. Comparison of common DC and AC bus architectures for EV fast charging stations and impact on power quality. ETransportation 2020, 5, 100066.
  33. Alame, D.; Azzouz, M.; Kar, N. Assessing and mitigating impacts of electric vehicle harmonic currents on distribution systems. Energies 2020, 13, 3257.
  34. Dharmakeerthi, C.; Mithulananthan, N.; Saha, T. Impact of electric vehicle fast charging on power system voltage stability. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2014, 57, 241–249.
  35. Alshareef, S.M.; Morsi, W.G. Impact of fast charging stations on the voltage flicker in the electric power distribution systems. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Electrical Power and Energy Conference (EPEC), Saskatchewan, Canada, 22–25 October 2017; pp. 1–6.
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to : ,
View Times: 215
Revisions: 3 times (View History)
Update Date: 17 Jul 2023
Video Production Service