Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 -- 4436 2023-07-03 11:18:06 |
2 layout Meta information modification 4436 2023-07-04 03:24:08 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?


Are you sure to Delete?
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Yu, Y.; Liu, H.; Xia, H.; Chu, Z. Sustainable Application of Copper-Based Antimicrobial Compounds. Encyclopedia. Available online: (accessed on 16 June 2024).
Yu Y, Liu H, Xia H, Chu Z. Sustainable Application of Copper-Based Antimicrobial Compounds. Encyclopedia. Available at: Accessed June 16, 2024.
Yu, Yue, Haifeng Liu, Haoran Xia, Zhaohui Chu. "Sustainable Application of Copper-Based Antimicrobial Compounds" Encyclopedia, (accessed June 16, 2024).
Yu, Y., Liu, H., Xia, H., & Chu, Z. (2023, July 03). Sustainable Application of Copper-Based Antimicrobial Compounds. In Encyclopedia.
Yu, Yue, et al. "Sustainable Application of Copper-Based Antimicrobial Compounds." Encyclopedia. Web. 03 July, 2023.
Sustainable Application of Copper-Based Antimicrobial Compounds

Copper-based antimicrobial compounds (CBACs) can control a wide range of plant diseases, such as grape downy mildew, citrus black spot, fire blight of pome fruits, walnut blight, potato late blight, stone fruit canker, coffee berry disease, olive leaf spot, and powdery mildew of many other crops. At present, not considering metal contaminants, CBACs are still at the forefront as the main pesticides sold in Europe.

copper ions antimicrobial compound elicitor defense response

1. Introduction

Agriculture is the most important basic industry globally, as it plays an important role in supporting the demand for food and raw materials in other industries. However, with the global population projected to reach 9.7 billion by 2050, the demand for food by humans has also been increasing [1][2]. However, annual increases in production yield for the vast majority of crops have been steadily declining [3][4][5]. In order to meet the growing needs of humanity and industry, certain measures must be urgently taken to increase food production. Although breeding high-yield varieties is an effective strategy, the yield losses caused by crop diseases have been estimated as 11–30% [6], and the losses of fruits, vegetables, and grains caused by pests and diseases may reach as high as 78%, 54%, and 32% without fungicides [7]. Therefore, finding effective ways to prevent and control plant disease is expected to be useful in improving food production.
Copper ions are used as broad-spectrum protectant fungicides in agricultural systems to control a series of plant diseases. They appear in some forms of copper-based antimicrobial compounds (CBACs), which have been commercially used for nearly 14 decades [8]. With broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, CBACs can control a wide range of plant diseases, such as grape downy mildew [9], citrus black spot [10], fire blight of pome fruits [11], walnut blight [12][13], potato late blight [14], stone fruit canker [15], coffee berry disease [16], olive leaf spot [17], and powdery mildew of many other crops [18][19][20]. At present, not considering metal contaminants, CBACs are still at the forefront as the main pesticides sold in Europe [8][21].

2. Development of Copper-Based Antimicrobial Compounds

The control of plant diseases through the use of copper agents has a long history. In fact, the earliest known record of bluestone (copper sulfate) being used to kill smut spores on wheat grains was in France [22] when, in 1807, Prevost began to use bluestone to disinfect grain seeds [22]. In 1838, the Boucherie of France found that adding 1 part copper sulfate (CuSO4) to 100 parts water could effectively protect wood [23]. After that, CBACs consisting of CuSO4 were widely used to control grapevine downy mildew (Table 1), establishing the rudiments of CBACs.
In 1873, Dreisch added a lime water bath after the application of bluestone, thus improving Prevost’s method of treating wheat grain seeds [22]. In 1883, the beneficial effect of mixing lime with CuSO4 was proven [24], and in 1885, the French botanist Pierre-Marie-Alexis Millardet published his famous discovery that CuSO4 and lime mixed could protect grapes from downy mildew [24]. This mixture became known as the Bordeaux mixture and was the first commercial fungicide made of CBACs [24]. From 1887 to 1890, extensive tests using the Bordeaux mixture were conducted at several experimental agricultural stations, and it was shown to be effective in controlling various diseases, including potato late blight and many other leaf spots and blights [24][25]. As an excellent fungicide and bactericide, the Bordeaux mixture has been widely used for the past thirteen decades all over the world (see Table 1), representing the first generation of inorganic copper fungicides.
As excess free Cu2+ is toxic to plants, lime can help to reduce the concentration of free Cu2+ and cover the surface of plant tissues more effectively and stably. The ratio between CuSO4 and lime has been continuously improved in the development of CBACs. In the beginning, Millardet’s 8:8:100 formula involved mixing 8 pounds of CuSO4, 8 pounds of hydrated lime, and 100 gallons of water; however, the concentration of free copper ions was still too high to be used on young and copper-sensitive plants. To use the Bordeaux mixture on copper-sensitive plants, the relative amount of hydrated lime was increased in the formula (to a ratio of 4:4:100) to fix the Cu2+. To reduce the amount of CuSO4 and hydrated lime, a ratio of 2:6:100 was also used for spraying copper-sensitive seedlings [26].
Since the development of the Bordeaux mixture, second- and third-generation inorganic copper fungicides have gradually taken over in the management of plant diseases, such as copper oxychloride, copper oxide, and copper hydroxide [8][27]. These inorganic copper fungicides follow the principles of progressing from high to low concentrations and from soluble to insoluble from generation to generation. To cope with the disadvantages of inorganic copper fungicides, including complex preparation processes, instability, and difficulty combining them with other fungicides, two other types—synthetic organic copper and natural organic copper—have been developed [28]. Compared with inorganic CBACs, organic copper fungicides such as Cueva copper abietate and thiodiazole–copper have low copper content and greater stability, resulting in less environmental pollution and phytotoxicity (Table 1). With technological advancement, advanced nanotechnology has been introduced into the production of CBACs. Some papers have reported that, although the concentration of copper is low in nanoparticles (NPs), they are still effective in controlling diseases in tomatoes, pepper, rice, and many other plants and have reduced impacts on the environment due to their easy uptake into plant cells [29][30][31][32][33]. Copper nanoparticles are more efficient than conventional CBACs in preventing fungal-induced diseases [34]. For example, relevant studies have shown that Cu–chitosan NPs exhibit higher antifungal activity, due to both the chitosan and copper ions. On one hand, the chitosan component of the NPs can induce plant-defense-related enzymes, leading to an increase in plant antifungal activity. On the other hand, fungi have a tendency to produce different levels of acids during their infection of plants. The resulting acidic pH induces the protonation of chitosan amino groups, resulting in the release of free copper ions from the chitosan nanostructures. These enter fungal cells and induce the synthesis of highly reactive hydroxyl radicals, which destroy biological molecules [35]. Conventional nanoparticle synthesis routes using chemical and physical methods, such as chemical reduction, hydrothermal, and sol–gel, methods are considered harmful to the environment, due to the use of toxic chemical products, and are also costly. In response, many aqueous extracts from plants such as Portulaca oleracea and Piper nigrum have recently been used to biosynthesize promising, safe, cheap, and eco-friendly Cu-NPs [21][36][37]. Moreover, recent studies have shown that copper nanoparticles in combination with conventional fungicides can provide an environmentally safe and sustainable resistance management strategy through reducing the use of fungicides [38].
Table 1. Various types of CBACs with advantages and disadvantages.

3. Construction of a Physical Barrier by Covering Plants with Slightly Soluble CBACs

A long historical practice is the application of CBACs as slightly soluble protective reagents, which cover the surface of plant tissues before diseases emerge and form a film to prevent direct contact between pathogens and plants. Moreover, they are absorbed into the tissue surface, making them difficult to be washed away by rain and dew, thus maintaining a long-term residual effect. In 1882, Millardet proposed that the actual treatment of mold with a mixture of CuSO4 and lime should not aim to kill the parasites in the leaves but, instead, should aim to prevent their development by covering the surface of leaves with various substances [45]. In the Bordeaux mixture, the generated calcium sulfate is thought to be necessary for tightly adhering the CBACs to the leaves. In other microsoluble CBACs, specific chemical additives facilitate this attachment [8][46]. In addition to separating the host plant from pathogens, the microsoluble film has two additional benefits: On one hand, the forms of CBACs that mainly coat the plant surface are soluble but complexed, thus only allowing a few free copper ions to be released and control plant diseases [47]. In fact, the concentration of copper ions on a leaf depends on the equilibrium established with complex and soluble copper forms [48]. This prevents the release of an excessive amount of Cu2+, which would lead to plant phytotoxicity. On the other hand, the slow and continuous release of Cu2+ on the tissue surface provides long-term prevention for plants; however, this kind of protection is not stable. Long-term rainwater scouring can break through the film of the Bordeaux mixture, reducing the protective effect and efficacy and allowing invasion by pathogens. Moreover, the weak acid substances secreted by plants and micro-organisms can also generate an acidic environment, leading to the inappropriate high-frequency release of Cu2+, which may have a negative phytotoxic effect [49]. High concentrations of Cu2+ can create visible corky damage on the surface of young fruit, reducing the aesthetic value of the fruits and compromising their marketability [8].
To reduce the environmental pollution and phytotoxicity caused by excess Cu2+, it is particularly important to develop novel CBACs. In fact, the release rate of Cu2+ affects the availability and persistence of conventional CBACs, such as the Bordeaux mixture. The rapid release of Cu2+ can have a good effect in terms of disease management, but the pesticide effect will be short and the security poor. Due to the large particle size and water solubility, CBACs can only form discontinuous deposits on the surface of plants, allowing for only partial blocking of direct contact between pathogenic microorganisms and the plants. In contrast, thicker deposits can increase the risk of excessive release of copper ions, causing plant toxicity [8]. Therefore, developing organic copper agents to reduce the excessive release of active copper ions and/or reducing the particle size of CBACs to promote the formation of a continuous film on plant surfaces are effective strategies to prevent bacterial and fungal spore invasion. Microscopically, oxine–copper is composed of copper ions and oxine rings: two oxine rings tightly grip the copper ions, which can gradually and safely release free copper ions [41]. The small size of these particles leads to a high surface-area-to-volume ratio, meaning more uniform coverage and better protection. Additionally, smaller particles are more tightly adsorbed on the plant surface and are more tolerant to rain wash than larger particles, giving longer effective protection. Studies using SEM have shown that foliar application of MoS2-CuNPs allowed for the formation of a protective film and increased the density of trichomes on the surface of rice leaves, thus preventing infection by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae cells [50]. Furthermore, NiO:Cu thin films observed by SEM presented antifungal activity against Aspergillus niger (which affects various fruits) and Macrophomina phaseolina (which is a soil-borne fungus responsible for root and lower stem infections in several plants) [51]. In addition to the smaller particle size, the diversity of forms of CBACs and their additives is another method to ensure even spraying, promoting adherence and stronger fixation on plant tissues. At present, various forms of CBACs, including aqueous solutions, wettable powders, and suspending agents, are broadly utilized. These have good efficacy but often a poor retention period, being greatly affected by rain wash. Some researchers have developed mineral oil emulsions for CBACs. The addition of mineral oil to fungicide spray mixtures is a frequently used strategy for the control of citrus black spot and potato pests [52][53], as mineral oil can significantly improve the diffusion, adhesion, and retention of copper ions; increase the deposition amount of effective components; and improve the ability to resist rain wash after mixing with CBACs [54]. Overall, it should be emphasized that mineral oil can highly improve the prevention effect of CBACs.
In addition, adjuvants are the key factors for improving the stability and efficacy of CBACs. During the processing and application of pesticides, surfactants can help them to distribute over, adhere to, and penetrate the surfaces of plants, directly or indirectly improving the effective pesticide usage rate. Agricultural organosilicon adjuvants, such as Silwet L-77 or siloxane, are often used as adjuvants for CBACs for the control of citrus canker due to their good wettability, ductility, and permeability. When mixed with CBACs, adjuvants can improve the ductility and adsorption properties of copper agents on the leaves, increasing the tolerance to rain acidification and plant disease resistance [46]. Alternatively, bamboo vinegar—which contains organic acids, ketones, and alcohols—is a good solubilizer, co-solvent, and penetrant. Researchers have boiled bamboo vinegar and CuSO4 to form a preparation which can enhance the control effect of CuSO4 on tobacco brown spot disease and black shank disease, as well as improving its inhibition of the growth of green algae, while the copper ion concentration remains unchanged [55]. Additionally, ethoxy-modified polysiloxane, polyoxyethylene monolau-rate β pine terpene polymer, ammonium salt, and other adjuvants play supporting roles to CBACs, helping them to attach to plant tissues more evenly and stably [46]. However, recent studies have also revealed that Cu2+ released from CuSO4 and nanomaterials is rapidly absorbed into the leaf cuticle [56]. Interestingly, copper-based nanoparticles can pass quickly through the cuticle, while CuSO4 can stay longer in the leaf cuticle, which appears to strengthen the alternative physical barrier [56].

4. The Second Tier of Protection and Copper-Resistant Strains

Generally, copper is a necessary metal ion for bacterial growth and development, and bacteria uptake Cu2+ into the cytoplasm through copper uptake transporters such as CcoA and YcnJ-like proteins [57][58][59][60]. Then, the copper reductase cbb3-type cytochrome c oxidase (cbb3-Cox) assembly factor CcoG is present on the cell membrane, where the incoming Cu2+ is assembled into the cysteine conservative motif of CcoG and converted into Cu+ through transferring electrons to the [4Fe-4S] cluster (Figure 1a). Furthermore, Cu+ binds to the active center of enzymes to maintain its vital role in bacteria [61][62]. However, excess free copper ions also lead to toxic or antimicrobial activity in bacteria, forming the second-tier protection of CBACs. The antimicrobial activity of CBACs can be further divided into two parts: first, deposited CBACs can react with water and oxygen to produce OH, causing bacterial cell membranes to suffer from oxidative damage, leading to protein denaturation and increased membrane permeability. This damage to cell membranes further results in the leaking out of some bacterial essential nutrients and proteins. In addition, excessive Cu2+ or Cu+ entering the cytoplasm will cause bacterial oxidative stress and even cell death. Under an anoxic environment, Cu+ replaces iron in the iron–sulfur clusters of dehydratases, resulting in the degradation of those crucial enzymes. Furthermore, the released iron may subsequently initiate the Fenton/Haber–Weiss reaction, while the transformation between Cu+ and Cu2+ leads to a Fenton-like reaction, all of which generate OH and ROS, consequently causing lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation, and nucleic acid damage [63][64][65][66].
Figure 1. Two strategies used to manipulate the excessive copper in Gram-negative bacteria. (a) Three strategies for copper homeostasis: (I) the chaperone protein CopZ loads Cu+ and transfers it to P1B-type Cu-exporting ATPase CcoI and P-type ATPase family CopA, which respond to the efflux of excessive Cu+; (II) each metallothionein (MT) protein binds seven Cu+ ions to neutralize the toxicity; and (III) copper storage protein binds excessive Cu+. (b) Cop systems to resist copper. P. syringae pv. tomato strains encode an operon of copABCDRS containing up to six genes on the plasmid pPT23D. The periplasmic protein CopA combines eleven copper ions to restrict the excess copper in the cytoplasm. The outer membrane protein copB may play a role in fixing extracellular copper ions, as does CopA. The periplasmic chaperone protein CopC contains two copper ion binding sites, for binding either Cu+ or Cu2+. CopC delivers Cu+ to different interactors—such as CopA, CopB, CopD, and CopS—either for uptake or to fix Cu+ to balance the concentration in cells. The plasma membrane protein CopS acts as a copper sensor. It may interact with CopA or CopC to transmit copper signals to CopR, thus continuously regulating the expression of cop operon activated by copR. The picture was drawn using the MedPeer software ( (2 February 2023)).
Bacteria also depend on two systems to overcome excess copper: copper homeostasis and copper resistance protein (cop). As shown in Figure 1, in order to maintain the cytoplasmic copper concentration, bacteria have developed three strategies: First (I), the chaperone protein CopZ loads Cu+ and transfers it to P1B-type Cu-exporting ATPase CcoI and P-type ATPase family CopA, which respond to the efflux of excessive Cu+ [58][67][68][69][70][71]. Second (II), metallothionein (MT) is a super-family of cysteine-rich small proteins which bind Cu+ (as well as other heavy metal ions) through metal–sulfur bonds in order to neutralize their toxicity [72][73][74]. After sensing the increased intracellular Cu+, bacteria activate the expression of specific copper metallogenetic transcription factors (MRTFs), subsequently inducing the expression and accumulation of MT molecules to reduce the Cu+ level in the cytoplasm [75]. Third (III), excess Cu+ is bound with the elevated cytosolic copper storage protein (Ccsp), which consists of a homotetramer assembly capable of binding Cu+ with the help of a CopZ-like copper chaperone [76].
Over-use of CBACs has resulted in long-term exposure of plant pathogenic bacteria to high concentrations of copper ions, resulting in the selection of copper-resistant strains, such as Xanthomonas, Pseudomonas, and Erwinia spp. [77][78][79][80][81][82][83], which have direct and indirect impacts on agricultural production [84][85]. Through the isolation and identification of copper-resistant strains from copper-rich soil, more than 95% of the copper-resistant isolates were identified as Gram-negative bacteria [86]. Unlike Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria have an outer membrane, a periplasmic space, and an inner membrane which endow them with a special structural basis for copper resistance. To date, most copper-resistant strains have developed from horizontal transfer of the cop system or pco system in response to excessive copper, with representative examples being Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) and Escherichia coli, respectively [87].
The cop system is a conserved copper-resistant system in P. syringae pv. tomato, which is encoded by an operon containing up to six genes (copABCDRS) on the plasmid pPT23D [87]. CopA is a periplasmic protein that contains methionine, histidine, and aspartic-acid-rich motifs. Each CopA protein can combine up to eleven copper ions [88][89]. This high binding capacity restricts excess copper from entering the bacterial cytoplasm. As an outer membrane protein, CopB also contains repetitive amino acid sequences (Asp-His-X2-Met-X2-Met). Although there is no direct evidence that CopB can combine with copper [90][91][92], it may be assumed that the role of CopB is to fix extracellular copper ions. CopC is a periplasmic chaperone protein that contains two copper ion binding sites for binding either Cu+ or Cu2+. It has been proposed that CopC transfers Cu+ to different interactors, such as CopA, CopB, CopD, and CopS, in order to balance the Cu+ concentration in cells [92]. On one hand, CopD, the interaction protein of CopC, is a plasma membrane protein that transports essential CopC-delivered copper through the inner membrane into the cytoplasm [89][90]. On the other hand, CopC interacts with CopA and CopB to deliver the carried Cu+ for fixing, which can reduce the associated toxicity [90]. The CopS located on the plasma membrane serves as a copper sensor, which may interact with CopA or CopC to transmit copper signals to CopR, thus continuously regulating the expression of the cop operon activated by CopR [91]. To summarize the copper resistance mechanism of Pst, the cop operon located on plasmid pPT23D can chelate excessive copper ions through a group of proteins, particularly CopA and CopB. The copper resistance mechanism in E. coli is the pco system containing pcoABCD, which is located on the plasmid pRJ1004 and corresponds to the cop operon in Pst [93][94][95][96]. To date, all identified copper-resistant Pseudomonas strains have homologs of the cop operon in their chromosomes [97]; for example, Cupriavidus metallidurans CH34 contains the complete copABCDRS [98][99], while X. citri pv. citri contains only copABCD [100]. Some Xanthomonas copper-resistant strains only contain copLAB, such as X. arboricola pv. juglandis, conferring resistance to copper ions [101][102][103]. The mechanisms of copper-resistant fungi have been reviewed in [104], which were generally indicated to enhance Cu+ exporting and homeostasis. Yarrowia lipolytica is an inherently copper-resistant yeast in which Cu2+ significantly promotes the yeast-to-hypha transition, allowing for the better survival of hyphae than yeast-form cells in the presence of CuSO4 [105].
Some pathogens could alternatively develop new weapons to overcome their copper sensitivity. Xanthomonas oryzae PXO99A is more sensitive to copper than other wild strains caused by the copA mutation [106]. It seems not to back mutate for a copper-resistant strategy but to develop a novel TAL effector of PthXo1 to upregulate the expression of OsSWEET11/Xa13 in rice [107], which interacts with plant copper-uptake complex components of OsCOPT1 and OsCOPT5 to reduce the copper concentration in vascular tissue [108]. Moreover, the upregulated OsSWEET11 protein has additional susceptible functions as the sucrose efflux from the phloem parenchyma cells for bacterial proliferation [109]. Consistent with the conclusion, PXO99A introduced into the copAB could restore copper resistance but fail to overcome the xa13-mediated resistance [106].

5. Enhanced Plant Resistance to Pathogens and Activation of Defense-like Responses

At present, the application of copper preparations is the only way to control many plant diseases. However, an over-reliance on and over-use of CBACs have resulted in the evolution of many Cu-resistant strains, reducing their effectiveness in controlling plant diseases [110][111]. Developing new types of CBACs or mixing them with other fungicides provides an effective way to control plant diseases caused by copper-resistant strains. Copper used with EBDCs (Ethylene bis-dithiocarbamates) can provide control of bacterial speck and spot diseases, even when copper-tolerant populations are present [112][113][114]. Recent studies have demonstrated that advanced copper composites and nano-magnesium oxide materials are effective against copper-tolerant Xanthomonas spp., increasing the control of bacterial spot in tomato under field conditions [115][116][117]. Furthermore, although the emergence of copper-resistant strains has rapidly increased, CBACs are still effective in controlling some of the diseases caused by those pathogens [118], implying that the protection imparted by CBACs does not only rely on their antimicrobial activity and the formation of a physical film. Previous reports have demonstrated that copper stress could also activate a series of defense-like responses in plants. In alfalfa (Medicago sativa), the mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) SIMK and SAMK are involved in the response to pathogen-associated stimulation. Excessive copper specifically activates the MAPK SIMKK, which can activate SIMK and SAMK in Medicago sativa [119]. Additionally, excess copper activated MAPK2, MAPK3, and MAPK4 in rice roots [120][121][122]. ROS burst is one of the earliest events in plants under heavy metal stress, as the ROS act as signaling molecules that regulate the plant’s response to abiotic and biotic stresses [123][124][125]. Excess copper promotes ROS synthesis through Fenton and Haber–Weiss reactions [126]. Copper-elevated ROS accumulation has already been identified in Arabidopsis thaliana [127], Pisum sativum L. [128], Medicago sativa [129], and Oryza sativa L. [130]. Previous reports have demonstrated that copper stress enhanced plant resistance to pathogens through copper-binding proteins. In cotton, the blue copper-binding protein GhUMC1 has been shown to be involved in resistance to Verticillium dahlia through regulating the jasmonic acid signaling pathway and lignin metabolism [131]. In barley, Mla and Rom1 negatively regulate miR398, which elevates the transcription level of SOD1 and enhances resistance against powdery mildew [132], indicating the important role of the miR398–SOD module in regulating plant resistance against pathogens. Interestingly, the foliar application of two copper nanomaterials enhanced resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici, a pathogen that causes the root fungal disease Fusarium wilt, as well as enhancing phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) and peroxidase (POD) activities in tomato roots [30][56].

6. Eliciting Plant Immunity to Strengthen the Third-Tier Barrier

The above observations—that is, that CBACs can manage copper-resistant strains and excessive copper can trigger defense-like responses in addition to being toxic to plants [118][119][120][121][122][123][124][125][126][127][128][129][130]—indicate that copper may directly trigger plant immunity. Indeed, Liu et al. found that a concentration of 10 nM CuSO4 was sufficient to enhance the resistance of Arabidopsis plants against Pst DC3000 [133]. In addition, spraying potato with CuSO4 (100 nM) enhanced resistance to late blight [134]; however, in in vitro co-culture experiments, these concentrations of CuSO4 had no inhibitory effect on microbial growth [133][134]. Moreover, they found that copper ions triggered a series of immune responses, including ethylene (ET) and salicylic acid (SA) biosynthesis pathways, ROS burst, Ca2+ signaling, MAPK activation, callose deposition, and up-regulation of the expression of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes [133], which are similar to the responses induced by flg22, a conserved short peptide of flagellin from Pst DC3000 [135][136]. In contrast with flg22-triggered immunity, Cu2+ treatment rapidly activated the synthesis of ET by specifically inducing the expression of AtACS8 dependent on the CuRE cis-element in the promoter region [137]. Downstream of the ET signaling pathway, Cu2+-mediated callose deposition required both AtMYB51 and AtMYB122, while it mainly required AtMYB51 for flg22 in Arabidopsis [138]. A nuclear copper chaperone CCP containing the classical copper-binding site may interact with and recruit the transcription factor TGA2 to induce the expression of PR1 and enhance the resistance to Pst DC3000 [139]. In potato (Solanum tuberosum), Cu2+ activated ET biosynthesis to induce resistance to potato late blight, as well as inhibiting the biosynthesis of abscisic acid (ABA) by activating the transcription factor StEIN3 (ethylene insensitive 3), thus directly repressing the expression of StNCED1 (9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase) and the ABA biosynthesis gene StABA1 by targeting their promoters [134]. Yao et al. have recently found that copper ion transporters and copper ion binding proteins, such as HMA5, were significantly induced and played a broad-spectrum role in virus–rice interactions. Most of the copper ions entered rice cells from the intercellular space, increasing the copper ion content in the leaves. Copper-orchestrated virus resistance was promoted through inhibiting the accumulation of the SPL9 protein, thus reducing the expression of SPL9 target gene miR528 and enhancing the transcription level of ascorbate oxidase (AO) and ROS levels [140]. On the other hand, copper ions could directly activate the AO enzyme activity to enhance viral resistance in rice [140]. Without a doubt, a low concentration of copper ions can trigger plant immune responses, thus participating in the construction of a third-tier barrier to protect plants against pathogens. Similarly, the induction of plant immunity was observed when using Cu2O-NPs to control cucumber root rot disease [141]. However, over thirteen decades, a considerable number of studies have shown that CBACs cannot effectively control the plant diseases caused by copper-resistant strains compared with copper-sensitive strains [142][143]. Inappropriate timing of applications, with respect to wounding and infection events, is an alternative explanation; that the activated PTI-like immunity may not be able to control all pathogens is also an alternative explanation. However, such results suggest that more research is needed to fully explain the specific mechanisms by which copper ions regulate plant immune responses, as well as the need for further research on whether copper can trigger immune responses in different kinds of plants.


  1. West, P.C.; Gerber, J.S.; Engstrom, P.M.; Mueller, N.D.; Brauman, K.A.; Carlson, K.M.; Cassidy, E.S.; Johnston, M.; MacDonald, G.K.; Ray, D.K.; et al. Leverage points for improving global food security and the environment. Science 2014, 345, 325–328.
  2. Lipper, L.; Thornton, P.; Campbell, B.M.; Baedeker, T.; Braimoh, A.; Bwalya, M.; Caron, P.; Cattaneo, A.; Garrity, D.; Henry, K.; et al. Climate-smart agriculture for food security. Nat. Clim. Change 2014, 4, 1068–1072.
  3. Kumar, P.; Sharma, P.K. Soil salinity and food security in India. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2020, 4, 533781.
  4. Lobell, D.B.; Schlenker, W.; Costa-Roberts, J. Climate trends and global crop production since 1980. Science 2011, 333, 616–620.
  5. Kah, M.; Tufenkji, N.; White, J.C. Nano-enabled strategies to enhance crop nutrition and protection. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2019, 14, 532–540.
  6. Savary, S.; Willocquet, L.; Pethybridge, S.J.; Esker, P.; McRoberts, N.; Nelson, A. The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 3, 430–439.
  7. Zhang, W.J.; Jiang, F.B.; Ou, J.F. Global pesticide consumption and pollution: With China as a focus. Proc. Int. Acad. Ecol. Environ. Sci. 2011, 1, 125–144.
  8. Jay, R.L.; Ebrahim, O.; Franklin, B.; Jürgen, K.; Jeffrey, B.; Jones, J.A. Thirteen decades of antimicrobial copper compounds applied in agriculture. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2018, 38, 28.
  9. Torre, A.L.; Chiranjib, M.; Federica, C.; Valerio, B. Natural alternatives to copper and low-rate copper formulations to control grape downy mildew in organic farming. Hell. Plant Prot. J. 2012, 5, 13–21.
  10. Schutte, G.C.; Beeton, K.V.; Kotzé, J.M. Rind stippling on valencia oranges by copper fungicides used for control of citrus black spot in South Africa. Plant Dis. 1997, 81, 851–854.
  11. Elkins, R.B.; Temple, T.N.; Shaffer, C.A.; Ingels, C.A.; Lindow, S.B.; Zoller, B.G.; Johnson, K.B. Evaluation of dormant-stage inoculum sanitation as a component of a fire blight management program for fresh-market bartlett pear. Plant Dis. 2015, 99, 1147–1152.
  12. Lee, Y.A.; Milton, N.; Schroth, M.H.; Steven, E.L.; Wang, X.L.; Bill, O.; Richard, B.; Beth, L.T. Increased toxicity of iron-amended copper-containing bactericides to the walnut blight pathogen Xanthomonas campestris pv. juglandis. Phytopathology 1993, 83, 1460–1465.
  13. Ninot, A.; Aletà, N.; Moragrega, C.; Montesinos, E. Evaluation of a reduced copper spraying program to control bacterial blight of walnut. Plant Dis. 2002, 86, 583–587.
  14. Large, E.C.; Beer, W.J. Field trials of copper fungicides for the control of potato blight; low-copper fungicides. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1946, 33, 406–413.
  15. Wimalajeewa, D.L.S.; Robert, S.; Cahill, G.H.; Hg, S.; Washbourne, J.R. Chemical control of bacterial canker (Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae) of apricot and cherry in Victoria. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 1991, 31, 705–708.
  16. Furtado, I. Effect of copper fungicides on the occurrence of the pathogenic form of Colletotrichum coffeanum. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1969, 53, 325–328.
  17. Obanor, F.O.; Walter, M.; Jones, E.E.; Jaspers, M.V. Efficacy of systemic acquired resistance inducers in olive leaf spot management. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2013, 42, 163–168.
  18. Graham, R.D. Susceptibility to powdery mildew of wheat plants deficient in copper. Plant Soil 1980, 56, 181–185.
  19. Karl, H.S. The influence of boron and copper deficiency upon infection by Erysiphe graminis D.C. the powdery mildew, in wheat var. kenya. Plant Soil 1967, 27, 450–452.
  20. Beresford, R.M.; James, T.S.; Walker, M.J.; Spink, R.R.; Marshall; White, V. Copper and slaked lime for the control of black spot and powdery mildew in apples. Fruit Crops 1995, 48, 83–88.
  21. Mesquita, A.F.; Gonçalves, F.J.M.; Gonçalves, A.M.M. The lethal and sub-lethal effects of fluorinated and copper-based pesticides—A review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 3706.
  22. Stevens, F.L.; Hall, J.G. Diseases of economic plants. Science 1915, 33, 621–622.
  23. Tratman, E.E.R. Report on the Use of Metal Railroad Ties and on Preservative Processes and Metal Tie-Plates for Wooden Ties; Deptartment of Agriculture, Forestry Division: Washington, DC, USA, 1894; Bulletin 9; p. 269.
  24. Johnson, G.F. The early history of copper fungicides. Agric. His. 1935, 9, 67–79.
  25. Plant Diseases; Vermont Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin: Burlington, VT, USA, 1892; Volume 28, p. 17.
  26. Mark, L. Dormant Sprays for Disease Control; Michigan State University Extension: East Lansing, MI, USA, 2008.
  27. Vicent, A.; Armengol, J.; García-Jiménez, J. Rain fastness and persistence of fungicides for control of alternaria brown spot of citrus. Plant Dis. 2007, 91, 393–399.
  28. Ma, Y.; Yu, H.; Liu, W.; Qin, Y.; Xing, R.; Li, P. Integrated proteomics and metabolomics analysis reveals the antifungal mechanism of the C-coordinated O-carboxymethyl chitosan Cu (II) complex. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 155, 1491–1509.
  29. Malandrakis, A.A.; Kavroulakis, N.; Chrysikopoulos, C.V. Use of copper, silver and zinc nanoparticles against foliar and soil-borne plant pathogens. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 670, 292–299.
  30. Hermida-Montero, L.A.; Pariona, N.; Mtz-Enriquez, A.I.; Carrión, G.; Paraguay-Delgado, F.; Rosas-Saito, G. Aqueous-phase synthesis of nanoparticles of copper/copper oxides and their antifungal effect against Fusarium oxysporum. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 380, 120850.
  31. Sathiyabama, M.; Manikandan, A. Application of copper-chitosan nanoparticles stimulate growth and induce resistance in finger millet (Eleusine coracana Gaertn.) plants against blast disease. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 1784–1790.
  32. Gaba, S.; Rai, A.K.; Varma, A.; Prasad, R.; Goel, A. Biocontrol potential of mycogenic copper oxide nanoparticles against Alternaria brassicae. Front. Chem. 2022, 10, 966396.
  33. Tarakanov, R.; Shagdarova, B.; Lyalina, T.; Zhuikova, Y.; Il’ina, A.; Dzhalilov, F.; Varlamov, V. Protective properties of copper-loaded chitosan nanoparticles against soybean pathogens Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. glycinea and Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens. Polymers 2023, 15, 1100.
  34. Sadek, M.E.; Shabana, Y.M.; Sayed-Ahmed, K.; Abou Tabl, A.H. Antifungal activities of sulfur and copper nanoparticles against cucumber postharvest diseases caused by Botrytis cinerea and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 412.
  35. Gomes, D.G.; Sanada, K.; Pieretti, J.C.; Shigueoka, L.H.; Sera, G.H.; Seabra, A.B.; Oliveira, H.C. Nanoencapsulation boosts the copper-induced defense responses of a susceptible Coffea arabica cultivar against Hemileia vastatrix. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 249.
  36. Eid, A.M.; Fouda, A.; Hassan, S.E.-D.; Hamza, M.F.; Alharbi, N.K.; Elkelish, A.; Alharthi, A.; Salem, W.M. Plant-based copper oxide nanoparticles; biosynthesis, characterization, antibacterial activity, tanning wastewater treatment, and heavy metals sorption. Catalysts 2023, 13, 348.
  37. Aien, J.; Khan, A.A.; Haq, S.; Khan, A.R.; Elmnasri, K.; Ben Ali, M.; AL-Harbi, M.S.; Alghonaim, M.I.; Alsalamah, S.A.; Qurtam, A.A.; et al. Antibacterial, antioxidant and physicochemical properties of Pipper nigram aided copper oxide nanoparticles. Crystals 2023, 13, 330.
  38. Malandrakis, A.A.; Kavroulakis, N.; Chrysikopoulos, C.V. Synergy between Cu-NPs and fungicides against Botrytis cinerea. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 703, 135557.
  39. Pérez-Rodríguez, P.; Paradelo, M.; Rodríguez-Salgado, I.; Fernández-Calviño, D.; López-Periago, J.E. Modeling the influence of raindrop size on the wash-off losses of copper-based fungicides sprayed on potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) leaves. J. Environ. Sci. Health A 2013, 48, 737–746.
  40. Montag, J.; Schreiber, L.; Schönherr, J. An in vitro study on the postinfection activities of copper hydroxide and copper sulfate against conidia of Venturia inaequalis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 893–899.
  41. Liu, X.; Yang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Lu, P.; Hu, D. Dissipation, residues and risk assessment of oxine-copper and pyraclostrobin in citrus. Food Addit. Contam. 2019, 36, 1538–1550.
  42. Tang, P.; Xiong, X.P.; Du, J.S. Control effect of 20% Longkejun (thiodiazole-copper) on crop bacterial diseases. Agric. Sci. Tech. Equip. 2008, 3, 35–36.
  43. Ahmad, H.; Venugopal, K.; Bhat, A.H.; Kavitha, K.; Ramanan, A.; Rajagopal, K.; Srinivasan, R.; Manikandan, E. Enhanced biosynthesis synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles (CuO-NPs) for their antifungal activity toxicity against major phyto-pathogens of apple orchards. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 37, 246.
  44. Dimkpa, C.O.; McLean, J.E.; Britt, D.W.; Anderson, A.J. Nano-CuO and interaction with nano-ZnO or soil bacterium provide evidence for the interference of nanoparticles in metal nutrition of plants. Ecotoxicology 2015, 24, 119–129.
  45. Millardet, A. Traitement du Mildiou et du Rot. Agric. Prat. 1885, 49, 513–516.
  46. Li, J.H.; Zhang, H.Q.; Li, N.; Shu, G.P.; Gu, Y.H.; Deng, Z.N. Influences of five surface active agents on control effect of copper fungicides to citrus canker disease of bingtang sweet orange. Hunan Agric. Sci. 2013, 5, 71–73.
  47. Menkissoglu, O. Relationship of free ionic copper and toxicity to bacteria in solutions of organic compounds. Phytopathology 1991, 81, 1258–1263.
  48. Menkissoglu, O.; Lindow, S.E. Chemical forms of copper on leaves in relation to the bactericidal activity of cupric hydroxide deposits on plants. Phytopathology 1991, 81, 1263–1270.
  49. Arman, P.; Wain, R.L. The role of leaf exudates in the solution of copper from Bordeaux mixture. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1958, 46, 366–374.
  50. Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Yang, D.; Jin, Q.; Wu, C.; Cui, J. Multifunctional molybdenum disulfide-copper nanocomposite that enhances the antibacterial activity, promotes rice growth and induces rice resistance. J. Hazard 2020, 394, 122551.
  51. Aftab, M.; Butt, M.Z.; Ali, D.; Aftab, Z.H.; Tanveer, M.U.; Fayyaz, B. Investigation of antifungal response of NiO and copper-doped NiO thin films against Aspergillus niger and Macrophomina phaseolina fungi. ESPR 2022, 29, 3840–3852.
  52. Galimberti, A.; Alyokhin, A. Lethal and sublethal effects of mineral oil on potato pests. J. Econ. Entomol. 2018, 111, 1261–1267.
  53. Silva Junior, G.J.; Moraes, M.R.; Moreira, R.R.; Behlau, F. Tree age and cultivar-oriented use of mineral oil added to fungicide tank mixture for the control of citrus black spot in sweet orange orchards. Pest Manag. Sci. 2022, 78, 488–498.
  54. Lu, H.L.; OuYang, G.C.; Tan, B.L.; Hou, B.H.; Meng, X.; Fang, X.R. Synergistic effect of mineral spray oil on inorganic copper fungicides to control Elsinoe fawcettii and Panonychus citri. Agrochemicals 2018, 57, 383–386.
  55. Xu, L.J.; Fu, J.G.; Yuan, Q.H.; Zou, G.J.; Wang, Y.Q.; Chen, J. A Bamboo Vinegar Copper Preparation and Its Application in Tobacco Disease Control and Preparation Method. Patent CN106857666A, 2 June 2020.
  56. Shen, Y.; Borgatta, J.; Ma, C.; Elmer, W.; Hamers, R.J.; White, J.C. Copper nanomaterial morphology and composition control foliar transfer through the cuticle and mediate resistance to root fungal disease in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 11327–11338.
  57. Ekici, S.; Yang, H.; Koch, H.G.; Daldal, F. Novel transporter required for biogenesis of cbb3-type cytochrome c oxidase in Rhodobacter capsulatus. mBio 2012, 3, e00293-11.
  58. Ekici, S.; Turkarslan, S.; Pawlik, G.; Dancis, A.; Baliga, N.S.; Koch, H.G.; Daldal, F. Intracytoplasmic copper homeostasis controls cytochrome c oxidase production. mBio 2014, 5, e01055-13.
  59. Khalfaoui-Hassani, B.; Wu, H.; Blaby-Haas, C.E.; Zhang, Y.; Sandri, F.; Verissimo, A.F.; Koch, H.G.; Daldal, F. Widespread distribution and functional specificity of the copper importer CcoA: Distinct Cu uptake routes for bacterial cytochrome c oxidases. mBio 2018, 9, e00065-18.
  60. Chillappagari, S.; Miethke, M.; Trip, H.; Kuipers, O.P.; Marahiel, M.A. Copper acquisition is mediated by YcnJ and regulated by YcnK and CsoR in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 2009, 191, 2362–2370.
  61. Marckmann, D.; Trasnea, P.I.; Schimpf, J.; Winterstein, C.; Andrei, A.; Schmollinger, S.; Blaby-Haas, C.E.; Friedrich, T.; Daldal, F.; Koch, H.G. The cbb3-type cytochrome oxidase assembly factor CcoG is a widely distributed cupric reductase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 21166–21175.
  62. Koch, H.G.; Winterstein, C.; Saribas, A.S.; Alben, J.O.; Daldal, F. Roles of the ccoGHIS gene products in the biogenesis of the cbb3-type cytochrome c oxidase. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 297, 49–65.
  63. Macomber, L.; Imlay, J.A. The iron-sulfur clusters of dehydratases are primary intracellular targets of copper toxicity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 8344–8349.
  64. Espírito Santo, C.; Lam, E.W.; Elowsky, C.G.; Quaranta, D.; Domaille, D.W.; Chang, C.J.; Grass, G. Bacterial killing by dry metallic copper surfaces. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 794–802.
  65. Halliwell, B.; Gutteridge, J.M.C. Oxygen-toxicity, oxygen radicals, transition-metals and disease. Biochem. J. 1984, 219, 1–14.
  66. Dupont, C.L.; Grass, G.; Rensing, C. Copper toxicity and the origin of bacterial resistance-new insights and applications. Metallomics 2011, 3, 1109–1118.
  67. Singleton, C.; Hearnshaw, S.; Zhou, L.; Le Brun, N.E.; Hemmings, A.M. Mechanistic insights into Cu(I) cluster transfer between the chaperone CopZ and its cognate Cu(I)-transporting P-type ATPase, CopA. Biochem. J. 2009, 424, 347–356.
  68. Meydan, S.; Klepacki, D.; Karthikeyan, S.; Margus, T.; Thomas, P.; Jones, J.E.; Khan, Y.; Briggs, J.; Dinman, J.D.; Vázquez-Laslop, N.; et al. Programmed ribosomal frameshifting generates a copper transporter and a copper chaperone from the same gene. Mol. Cell 2017, 65, 207–219.
  69. Utz, M.; Andrei, A.; Milanov, M.; Trasnea, P.I.; Marckmann, D.; Daldal, F.; Koch, H.G. The Cu chaperone CopZ is required for Cu homeostasis in Rhodobacter capsulatus and influences cytochrome cbb3 oxidase assembly. Mol. Microbiol. 2019, 111, 764–783.
  70. Kulajta, C.; Thumfart, J.O.; Haid, S.; Daldal, F.; Koch, H.G. Multi-step assembly pathway of the cbb3-type cytochrome c oxidase complex. J. Mol. Biol. 2006, 355, 989–1004.
  71. Peters, A.; Kulajta, C.; Pawlik, G.; Daldal, F.; Koch, H.G. Stability of the cbb3-type cytochrome oxidase requires specific CcoQ-CcoP interactions. J. Bacteriol. 2008, 190, 5576–5586.
  72. Sato, M.; Bremner, I. Oxygen free radicals and metallothionein. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1993, 14, 325–337.
  73. Sutherland, D.E.; Stillman, M.J. The „magic numbers” of metallothionein. Metallomics 2011, 3, 444–463.
  74. Olafson, R.W.; Abel, K.; Sim, R.G. Prokaryotic metallothionein: Preliminary characterization of a blue-green alga heavy metal-binding protein. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1979, 89, 36–43.
  75. Fürst, P.; Hu, S.; Hackett, R.; Hamer, D. Copper activates metallothionein gene transcription by altering the conformation of a specific DNA binding protein. Cell 1988, 55, 705–717.
  76. Straw, M.L.; Chaplin, A.K.; Hough, M.A.; Paps, J.; Bavro, V.N.; Wilson, M.T.; Vijgenboom, E.; Worrall, J. A cytosolic copper storage protein provides a second level of copper tolerance in Streptomyces lividans. Metallomics 2018, 10, 180–193.
  77. Masami, N.; Masao, G.; Katsumi, A.; Tadaaki, H. Nucleotide sequence and organization of copper resistance genes from Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2004, 110, 223–226.
  78. Richard, D.; Tribot, N.; Boyer, M.; Terville, K.; Boyer, S.; Javegny, M.; Roux-Cuvelier, O.; Pruvost, A.; Chabirand, M.A.; Vernière, C. First report of copper-resistant Xanthomonas citri pv. citri pathotype A causing Asiatic citrus canker in Réunion, France. Plant Dis. 2017, 101, 503.
  79. Sholberg, P.L.; Bedford, K.E.; Haag, P.; Randall, P. Survey of Erwinia amylovora isolates from British Columbia for resistance to bactericides and virulence on apple. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 2001, 23, 60–67.
  80. Behlau, F.; Hong, J.C.; Jones, J.B.; Graham, J.H. Evidence for acquisition of copper resistance genes from different sources in citrus-associated xanthomonads. Phytopathology 2013, 103, 409–418.
  81. Basim, H.; Minsavage, G.V.; Stall, R.E.; Wang, J.F.; Shanker, S.; Jones, J.B. Characterization of a unique chromosomal copper resistance gene cluster from Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2005, 71, 8284–8291.
  82. Cooksey, D.A. Genetics of bactericide resistance in plant pathogenic bacteria. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1990, 28, 201–219.
  83. Voloudakis, A.E.; Reignier, T.M.; Cooksey, D.A. Regulation of resistance to copper in Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. vesicatoria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 782–789.
  84. Graham, J.H.; Gottwald, T.R.; Cubero, J.; Achor, D.S. Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri: Factors affecting successful eradication of citrus canker. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2004, 5, 1–15.
  85. Gottwald, T.R.; Bassanezi, R.B.; Amorim, L.; Bergamin-Filho, A. Spatial pattern analysis of citrus canker-infected plantings in são paulo, Brazil, and augmentation of infection elicited by the asian leafminer. Phytopathology 2007, 97, 674–683.
  86. Berg, J.; Tom-Petersen, A.; Nybroe, O. Copper amendment of agricultural soil selects for bacterial antibiotic resistance in the field. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2005, 40, 146–151.
  87. Bondarczuk, K.; Piotrowska-Seget, Z. Molecular basis of active copper resistance mechanisms in Gram-negative bacteria. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 2013, 29, 397–405.
  88. Cha, J.S.; Cooksey, D.A. Copper resistance in Pseudomonas syringae mediated by periplasmic and outer membrane proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1991, 88, 8915–8919.
  89. Cooksey, D.A. Copper uptake and resistance in bacteria. Mol. Microbiol. 1993, 7, 1–5.
  90. Arnesano, F.; Banci, L.; Bertini, I.; Thompsett, A.R. Solution structure of CopC: A cupredoxin-like protein involved in copper homeostasis. Structure 2002, 10, 1337–1347.
  91. Puig, S.; Rees, E.M.; Thiele, D.J. The ABCDs of periplasmic copper trafficking. Structure 2002, 10, 1292–1295.
  92. Zhang, L.; Koay, M.; Maher, M.J.; Xiao, Z.; Wedd, A.G. Intermolecular transfer of copper ions from the CopC protein of Pseudomonas syringae. Crystal structures of fully loaded CuI CuII forms. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 5834–5850.
  93. Brown, N.L.; Barrett, S.R.; Camakaris, J.; Lee, B.T.; Rouch, D.A. Molecular genetics and transport analysis of the copperresistance determinant (pco) from Escherichia coli plasmid pRJ1004. Mol. Microbiol. 1995, 17, 1153–1166.
  94. Lee, S.M.; Grass, G.; Rensing, C.; Barrett, S.R.; Yates, C.J.; Stoyanov, J.V.; Brown, N.L. The Pco proteins are involved in periplasmic copper handling in Escherichia coli. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2002, 295, 616–620.
  95. Rouch, D.A.; Brown, N.L. Copper-inducible transcriptional regulation at two promoters in the Escherichia coli copper resistance determinant pco. Microbiology 1997, 143, 1191–1202.
  96. Huffman, D.L.; Huyett, J.; Outten, F.W.; Doan, P.E.; Finney, L.A.; Hoffman, B.M.; O’Halloran, T.V. Spectroscopy of Cu (II)-PcoC and the multicopper oxidase function of PcoA, two essential components of Escherichia coli pco copper resistance operon. Biochemistry 2002, 41, 10046–10055.
  97. Cooksey, D.A.; Azad, H.R.; Cha, J.R.; Lim, C.K. Copper resistance gene homologs in pathogenic and saprophytic bacterial species from tomato. Appl. Environ. Microbe 1990, 56, 431–435.
  98. Monchy, S.; Benotmane, M.A.; Wattiez, R.; van Aelst, S.; Auquier, V.; Borremans, B.; Mergeay, M.; Taghavi, S.; van der Lelie, D.; Vallaeys, T. Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of the pMOL30-encoded copper resistance in Cupriavidus metallidurans strain CH34. Microbiology 2006, 152, 1765–1776.
  99. Rensing, C.; Grass, G. Escherichia coli mechanisms of copper homeostasis in a changing environment. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2003, 27, 197–213.
  100. Richard, D.; Ravigné, V.; Rieux, A.; Facon, B.; Boyer, C.; Boyer, K.; Grygiel, P.; Javegny, S.; Terville, M.; Canteros, B.I.; et al. Adaptation of genetically monomorphic bacteria: Evolution of copper resistance through multiple horizontal gene transfers of complex and versatile mobile genetic elements. Mol. Ecol. 2017, 26, 2131–2149.
  101. Behlau, F.; Canteros, B.I.; Minsavage, G.V.; Jones, J.B.; Graham, J.H. Molecular characterization of copper resistance genes from Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri and Xanthomonas alfalfae subsp. citrumelonis. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2011, 77, 4089–4096.
  102. Behlau, F.; Canteros, B.I.; Jones, J.B.; Graham, J.H. Copper resistance genes from different xanthomonads and citrus epiphytic bacteria confer resistance to Xanthomonas citri subsp citri. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2012, 133, 949–963.
  103. Pruvost, O.; Richard, D.; Boyer, K.; Javegny, S.; Boyer, C.; Chiroleu, F.; Grygiel, P.; Parvedy, E.; Robène, I.; Maillot-Lebon, V.; et al. Diversity and geographical structure of Xanthomonas citri pv. citri on citrus in the south west Indian ocean region. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 945.
  104. Robinson, J.R.; Isikhuemhen, O.S.; Anike, F.N. Fungal-metal interactions: A review of toxicity and homeostasis. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 225.
  105. Ran, M.; Zhao, G.; Jiao, L.; Gu, Z.; Yang, K.; Wang, L.; Cao, X.; Xu, L.; Yan, J.; Yan, Y.; et al. Copper ion mediates yeast-to-hypha transition in Yarrowia lipolytica. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 249.
  106. Kong, L.; Ju, Y.; Dong, R.; Ding, X.; Li, N.; Chu, Z. The mutation of CopAB results in the sensitivity to copper and the reduction of pathogenicity for PXO99. Acta Phytopathol. Sin. 2018, 42, 176–186. (In Chinese)
  107. Yang, B.; Sugio, A.; White, F.F. Os8N3 is a host disease-susceptibility gene for bacterial blight of rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 10503–10508.
  108. Yuan, M.; Chu, Z.; Li, X.; Xu, C.; Wang, S. The bacterial pathogen Xanthomonas oryzae overcomes rice defenses by regulating host copper redistribution. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 3164–3176.
  109. Chen, L.; Hou, B.; Lalonde, S.; Takanaga, H.; Hartung, M.L.; Qu, X.; Guo, W.J.; Kim, J.G.; Underwood, W.; Chaudhuri, B.; et al. Sugar transporters for intercellular exchange and nutrition of pathogens. Nature 2010, 468, 527–532.
  110. Adaskaveg, J.E.; Hine, R.B. Copper tolerance and zinc sensitivity of Mexican strains of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria, causal agent of bacterial spot of pepper. Plant Dis. 1985, 69, 993–996.
  111. Andersen, G.L.; Menkissoglou, O.; Lindow, S.E. Occurrence and properties of copper-tolerant strains of Pseudomonas syringae isolated from fruit trees in California. Phytopathology 1991, 81, 648–656.
  112. Marco, G.M.; Stall, R.E. Control of bacterial spot of pepper initiated by strains of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria that differ in sensitivity to copper. Plant Dis. 1983, 67, 779–781.
  113. Huang, C.H.; Vallad, G.E.; Zhang, S.; Wen, A.; Balogh, B.; Figueiredo, J.F.L.; Behlau, F.; Jones, J.B.; Momol, M.T.; Olson, S.M. Effect of application frequency and reduced rates of acibenzolar-s-methyl on the field efficacy of induced resistance against bacterial spot on tomato. Plant Dis. 2012, 96, 221–227.
  114. Jones, J.B.; Jones, J.P. The effect of bactericides, tank mixing time and spray schedule on bacterial leaf spot of tomato. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 1985, 244, 247–298.
  115. Liao, Y.Y.; Strayer-Scherer, A.L.; White, J.; Mukherjee, A.; De La Torre-Roche, R.; Ritchie, L.; Colee, J.; Vallad, G.E.; Freeman, J.H.; Jones, J.B.; et al. Nano-Magnesium Oxide: A novel bactericide against copper-tolerant Xanthomonas perforans causing tomato bacterial spot. Phytopathology 2019, 109, 52–62.
  116. Carvalho, R.; Duman, K.; Jones, J.B.; Paret, M.L. Bactericidal activity of copper-zinc hybrid nanoparticles on copper-tolerant Xanthomonas perforans. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 20124.
  117. Aguiar, L.A.; Kimura, O.; Castilho, A.M.C.; Castilho, K.S.C.; Ribeiro, R.L.D.; Akiba, F.; Carmo, M.G.F. Effect of copper formulations on resident Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria populations on sweet pepper leaf surfaces. Hortic. Bras. 2003, 21, 44–50.
  118. Strayer-Scherer, A.; Liao, Y.Y.; Young, M.; Ritchie, L.; Vallad, G.E.; Santra, S.; Freeman, J.H.; Clark, D.; Jones, J.B.; Paret, M.L. Advanced copper composites against copper-tolerant Xanthomonas perforans and tomato bacterial spot. Phytopathology 2018, 108, 196–205.
  119. Jonak, C.; Nakagami, H.; Hirt, H. Heavy metal stress. Activation of distinct mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways by copper and cadmium. Plant Physiol. 2004, 136, 3276–3283.
  120. Chen, P.Y.; Lee, K.T.; Chi, W.C.; Hirt, H.; Chang, C.C.; Huang, H.J. Possible involvement of MAP kinase pathways in acquired metal-tolerance induced by heat in plants. Planta 2008, 228, 499–509.
  121. Yeh, C.M.; Chien, P.S.; Huang, H.J. Distinct signalling pathways for induction of MAP kinase activities by cadmium and copper in rice roots. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 659–671.
  122. Hung, W.C.; Huang, D.D.; Yeh, C.M.; Huang, H.J. Reactive oxygen species, calcium and serine/threonine phosphatase are required for copper-induced map kinase gene osmapk2, expression in rice. Plant Growth Regul. 2005, 45, 233–241.
  123. Dietz, K.J.; Baier, M.; Krämer, U. Free radicals and reactive oxygen species as mediators of heavy metal toxicity in plants. In Heavy Metal Stress in Plants; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1999; pp. 73–97.
  124. Stoiber, T.L.; Shafer, M.M.; Armstrong, D.E. Induction of reactive oxygen species in chlamydomonas reinhardtii in response to contrasting trace metal exposures. Environ. Toxicol. 2013, 28, 516–523.
  125. Devireddy, A.R.; Zandalinas, S.I.; Fichman, Y.; Mittler, R. Integration of reactive oxygen species and hormone signaling during abiotic stress. Plant J. 2021, 105, 459–476.
  126. Cheng, R.; Li, G.; Fan, L.; Jiang, J.; Zhao, Y. Therapeutic iminoboronate-based polymersomes with a Cu(ii)-mediated Fenton reaction-enhanced ROS-response. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 12246–12249.
  127. Suzuki, N.; Miller, G.; Morales, J.; Shulaev, V.; Torres, M.A.; Mittler, R. Respiratory burst oxidases: The engines of ROS signaling. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2011, 14, 691–699.
  128. Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I.; Escuredo, P.R.; Arrese-Igor, C.; Becana, M. Oxidative damage in pea plants exposed to water deficit or paraquat. Plant Physiol. 1998, 116, 173–181.
  129. Raklami, A.; Oufdou, K.; Tahiri, A.I.; Mateos-Naranjo, E.; Navarro-Torre, S.; Rodríguez-Llorente, I.D.; Meddich, A.; Redondo-Gómez, S.; Pajuelo, E. Safe cultivation of Medicago sativa in metal-polluted soils from semi-arid regions assisted by heat- and metallo-resistant PGPR. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 212.
  130. Bianka, S. The role of ethylene and ROS in salinity, heavy metal, and flooding responses in rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 685.
  131. Wan, Z.; Erlin, G.; Muhammad, S.; Yujing, W.; Honglei, W.; Xinhui, N.; Longfu, Z. Ghumc1, a blue copper-binding protein, regulates lignin synthesis and cotton immune response. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 504, 75–81.
  132. Xu, W.; Meng, Y.; Wise, R.P. Mla- and Rom1-mediated control of microRNA398 and chloroplast copper/zinc superoxide dismutase regulates cell death in response to the barley powdery mildew fungus. New Phytol. 2014, 201, 1396–1412.
  133. Liu, H.; Zhang, B.; Wu, T.; Ding, Y.; Ding, X.; Chu, Z. Copper ion elicits defense response in Arabidopsis thaliana by activating salicylate- and ethylene-dependent signaling pathways. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 1550–1553.
  134. Liu, H.; Xue, X.; Yu, Y.; Xu, M.; Lu, C.; Meng, X.; Zhang, B.; Ding, X.; Chu, Z. Copper ions suppress abscisic acid biosynthesis to enhance defence against Phytophthora infestans in potato. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2020, 21, 636–651.
  135. Chi, Y.; Wang, C.; Wang, M.; Wan, D.; Huang, F.; Jiang, Z.; Crawford, B.M.; Vo-Dinh, T.; Yuan, F.; Wu, F.; et al. Flg22-induced Ca2+ increases undergo desensitization and resensitization. Plant Cell Environ. 2021, 44, 3563–3575.
  136. Clay, N.K.; Adio, A.M.; Denoux, C.; Jander, G.; Ausubel, F.M. Glucosinolate metabolites required for an Arabidopsis innate immune response. Science 2009, 323, 95–101.
  137. Zhang, B.; Liu, H.; Ding, X.; Qiu, J.; Zhang, M.; Chu, Z. Arabidopsis thaliana ACS8 plays a crucial role in the early biosynthesis of ethylene elicited by Cu2+ ions. J. Cell Sci. 2018, 131, jcs202424.
  138. Yu, Y.; Xu, M.; Ding, X.; Chu, Z.; Liu, H. Activating the MYB51 and MYB122 to upregulate the transcription of glucosinolates biosynthesis genes by copper ions in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 162, 496–505.
  139. Chai, L.; Dong, K.; Liu, S.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Tong, X.; Zhu, F.; Zou, J.; Wang, X. A putative nuclear copper chaperone promoters plant immunity in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 6684–6696.
  140. Yao, S.; Kang, J.; Guo, G.; Yang, Z.; Huang, Y.; Lan, Y.; Zhou, T.; Wang, L.; Wei, C.; Xu, Z.; et al. The key micronutrient copper orchestrates broad-spectrum virus resistance in rice. Sci. Adv. 2022, 8, eabm0660.
  141. Kamel, S.M.; Elgobashy, S.F.; Omara, R.I.; Derbalah, A.S.; Abdelfatah, M.; El-Shaer, A.; Al-Askar, A.A.; Abdelkhalek, A.; Abd-Elsalam, K.A.; Essa, T.; et al. Antifungal activity of copper oxide nanoparticles against root rot disease in cucumber. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 911.
  142. Silva, V.L.; Lopes, C.A. Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato resistant to copper in copper-sprayed tomato fields. Fitopatol. Bras. 1995, 20, 85–89.
  143. Pernezny, K.; Kudela, V.; Kokoskova, B.; Hladka, I. Bacterial disease of tomato in the Czech and Slovak republics and lack of streptomycin resistance among copper-tolerant bacterial strains. Crop Prot. 1995, 14, 267–270.
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to : , , ,
View Times: 303
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 04 Jul 2023
Video Production Service