Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 -- 1482 2023-05-11 11:04:27 |
2 layout Meta information modification 1482 2023-05-12 03:06:58 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Abdulla, H.M.; Ibrahim, M.A. Urban Spatial Plan Impact on Land Value. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/44139 (accessed on 19 June 2024).
Abdulla HM, Ibrahim MA. Urban Spatial Plan Impact on Land Value. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/44139. Accessed June 19, 2024.
Abdulla, Hawnaz Magid, Muammal Alaaddin Ibrahim. "Urban Spatial Plan Impact on Land Value" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/44139 (accessed June 19, 2024).
Abdulla, H.M., & Ibrahim, M.A. (2023, May 11). Urban Spatial Plan Impact on Land Value. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/44139
Abdulla, Hawnaz Magid and Muammal Alaaddin Ibrahim. "Urban Spatial Plan Impact on Land Value." Encyclopedia. Web. 11 May, 2023.
Urban Spatial Plan Impact on Land Value
Edit

The availability of different types of zoning in cities due to urban planning, urban development, and design creates many problems, including land value and land price problems. On the land value side, several factors affect the land studied to determine its value. On the land price side, there is an exploratory reverse relation between land supply and its cost; an increase in supply leads to a reduction in land cost, while a lack of supply leads to a high price of land until the time comes that supply is equal to demand which is the satisfaction point.

urban spatial plan land value land price space syntax

1. Introduction

The availability of different types of zoning in cities due to urban planning, urban development, and design creates many problems, including land value and land price problems. On the land value side, several factors affect the land studied to determine its value. On the land price side, there is an exploratory reverse relation between land supply and its cost; an increase in supply leads to a reduction in land cost, while a lack of supply leads to a high price of land until the time comes that supply is equal to demand which is the satisfaction point. In new developments, the situation is different; increasing supply may not reduce the land price due to market fluctuation. In modern times, land has become a marketing resource used as a business tool; therefore, supply is less effective than it used to be. The availability of a weak economy and an oversupply of properties leads to low or no demand, and land prices tend to fall. On the other hand, land prices tend to rise with a strong economy, and a high demand for properties in a particular area, even with low supply. In addition, supply does not affect some properties in cities; for example, land in CBD areas, especially in developed countries, is increasing incredibly day by day without even considering supply.
In urban economy studies, various studies have attempted to determine land prices. According to the models recorded from the past three decades up until recent days, there is a need to obtain more accurate information about the relationship between the value of the urban street network and the price of land. Refs. [1][2] studied the effect of urban concentration and road networks on land value. The authors concluded that the impact on urban land values and the optimal space allocation for transportation activities still needs to be evident [2]. On the other hand, ref. [3] emphasized that land accessibility and location are the core concepts of land value and price. Land value occupies a more significant part of the research area, but it does so less implicitly in urban accessibility [3][4][5][6][7].
One of the critical characteristics of recent studies on urban morphology is the use of street networks to describe the built environment. Spatially, the city is not a collection of building blocks that may have geometrical regularities and ultimately architectural styles, but it is rather a network of interconnected open spaces created by those blocks of the urban grid [8][9][10]. Thus, the urban street or spatial grid can identify the diversity of a city. Many researchers have used street network patterns as an essential tool for urban assessment [11][12][13]. Ref. [14] (p. 66) identified that the sideways street could improve urban public spaces. Furthermore, ref. [10] studied 100 cities worldwide and demonstrated that cities could be analyzed according to their spatial network because of logical distribution: “Street networks organize and constrain a city’s transportation dynamics according to a certain spatial logic—be it planned or unplanned, ordered or disordered” [10] (p. 17). Such studies have unfolded cities in terms of their underlying spatial organization, tracing a connection between space and society, and revealing that the urban grid contains an imprint of a community [15]. Additionally, according to [16] (p. 53), the city’s communication generation mechanisms depend on the urban street network, which they defined as the spatial structure of the metropolitan area; this spatial structure can be described as a natural movement. The diversity of this natural movement causes the motion economy [16] (p. 54).

2. The Urban Economy and Urban Spatial System

As a fundamental component of the urban economy, the city center can define the origin of urban settlement and sustain it through economic growth. Several nodes can explain centrality as a theory of social and economic sciences in urban studies, with their association with the location of their network system. Traditionally, the city structure included a single city center. However, more recently, the city center has contained a monocentric city center and a multicenter of the urban form [17]. Changing economic development has led to a shift from a monocentric to a polycentric system. New urban economics can be traced back to Alonso (1964), Mutt (1969), and Mills (1967) as the creators of the pioneer theories of the urban internal structure linking land use to land markets. In urban land marketing, the Alonso bid rent theory (1964), based on van Thünen’s (1826) theory, explains the process of the formation and development of urban areas. The bid rent theory is the relation between the price and distance of land from the central business district (CBD). According to this theory, an urban spatial structure is the formation of a typical form of new classical economics; the spatial relationships between the different sectors explain the underlying drive for the functioning, appearance, and evaluation of cities. Bid rent theory is based on the reasoning that the more accessible an area is, the more profitable it is [18].
Regarding an urban street network and accessibility, ref. [19] pointed out that the city center should have a greater rate of employment for those who will thus choose to dwell in the city, considering the aspects of cost and also time. Ref. [20], in his book Edge City: Life on the New Frontier, discussed that the city’s edge is made up of many segregated centers out of the traditional business centers in suburban areas. According to [21], the new urban economic theory, as contemporary urban economics, works not only as a microeconomic theory but it also deals with urban spatial interaction theory; thus, this model balances supply and demand, the main features of urban economics. However, many other factors influence land markets at the microeconomic and macroeconomic levels; for many researchers, supply and demand primarily drive the market behavior [22][23][24] because some multi-collect factors play significant roles in supply and demand. Based on [25][26] studies, urban land price can be determined by economic fundamentals, including supply and demand at the city level. Supply and demand are among the oldest determinants of land prices; according to [27], land supply and demand are two factors that influence 80% of land price increases.
On the supply side, urban planning and design play a more significant role in defining land value; land distribution is a fundamental factor affecting the land market. For example, residential properties with access to more metro lines and stations and bus stops were associated with higher housing prices, with metro stations exerting more effects [22]. Four influencing factors have the most significant influence on housing price, distance to the inner ring, distance to the hospital, bus density, and space to the subway station [28]. Macroeconomic variables such as location, the availability of service buildings and infrastructure, and commercial activities explain land price; therefore, spatially, at the urban level, the value of land does not share the same logic as land price. Some of the most expensive plots of land are located on the city side, or in the heart of the city, and some of the lower-priced plots are situated in the suburbs or formal areas. On the demand side, land price increases as demand for land increases. Additionally, a higher order for good land causes the price of the ground to be higher; in many cases, much higher than what is affordable. For example, more affluent residents may be willing to pay a higher fee for a good view of the lake, while infrastructure barriers have an adverse effect [29]. A study by [25] demonstrated that solid demand in the Chinese real estate market causes the housing demand to exceed the supply market and raises housing prices, which subsequently raises land prices. Otherwise, economic fundamentals determine land value and cost at the urban level. Increasing capital raises the prices of local housing [30]. It can be stated that the demand for accessible land close to amenities with an applicable infrastructure is growing without considering affordability.
The modern era of the urban system differs from the 19th century; it includes a monocentric sample that calls polycentric development more attractive than before. In this way, the urban polycentric structure encourages the agglomeration of the local economy. Thus, urban economy and form can be evaluated based on spatial distribution. From an economics perspective, Alonso’s theory as a model economic distribution theory [5], and space syntax as the most relevant software for urban spatial analysis provides a better understanding of urban land economics.

References

  1. Derycke, P.-H. Urban Concentration and Road Networks: Two Approaches to Congestion, Part I. Flux 1991, 5, 35–45.
  2. Derycke, P.-H. Urban concentration and road networks: Two approaches to congestion, part II. Land values: An approach to congestion through the models of the “New Urban Economics”. Flux 1992, 7, 41–54.
  3. Webster, C. Pricing accessibility: Urban morphology, design, and missing markets. Prog. Plan. 2010, 73, 77–111.
  4. Adair, A.; McGreal, S.; Smyth, A.; Cooper, J.; Ryley, T. House prices and accessibility: The testing of relationships within the Belfast Urban Area. Hous. Stud. 2000, 15, 699–716.
  5. Ahlfeldt, G.M. If Alonso was right: Residual land price, accessibility, and urban attraction. SSRN Electron. J. 2008.
  6. Giuliano, G.; Gordon, P.; Pan, Q.; Park, J.Y. Accessibility and residential land values: Some tests with new measures. Urban Stud. 2010, 47, 3103–3130.
  7. Liu, Y.; Zheng, B.; Turkstra, J.; Huang, L. A hedonic model comparison for residential land value analysis. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoformation 2010, 12, S181–S193.
  8. Hillier, B.; Hanson, J. The Social Logic of Space; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1984; Available online: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/social-logic-of-space/6B0A078C79A74F0CC615ACD8B250A985 (accessed on 3 May 2021).
  9. Hillier, B.; Iida, S. Network and psychological effects in urban movement. In Proceedings of the Spatial Information Theory: International Conference, COSIT 2005, Ellicottsville, NY, USA, 14–18 September 2005; pp. 475–490. Available online: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1232/ (accessed on 18 March 2022).
  10. Boeing, G. Urban Spatial Order: Street Network Orientation, configuration, and entropy. Appl. Netw. Sci. 2019, 4, 67.
  11. Marshall, S. Streets and Patterns; Routledge: London, UK, 2004.
  12. Jiang, B.; Duan, Y.; Lu, F.; Yang, T.; Zhao, J. Topological structure of Urban Street Networks from the perspective of degree correlations. Environ. Plan. B Plan. Des. 2014, 41, 813–828.
  13. van Nes, A.; Yamu, C. Space syntax applied in urban practice. In Introduction to Space Syntax in Urban Studies; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 213–237. Available online: https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/50404 (accessed on 10 November 2022).
  14. Jacobs, J. The Death and Life of Great American Cities; Random House: New York, NY, USA, 1961; Available online: http://www.petkovstudio.com/bg/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/The-Death-and-Life-of-Great-American-Cities_Jane-Jacobs-Complete-book.pdf (accessed on 4 April 2022).
  15. De Holanda, F.; Mota, A.M.; Leite, A.A.; de Bello Soares, L.R.; Garcia, P.M. Eccentric Brasilia. Urban Des. Int. 2002, 7, 19–28.
  16. Hillier, B. Space Is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1996; Available online: https://spaceisthemachine.com/ (accessed on 2 June 2021).
  17. Huang, D.; Liu, Z.; Zhao, X. Monocentric or polycentric? the urban spatial structure of employment in Beijing. Sustainability 2015, 7, 11632–11656.
  18. Chidi, C.L. Bid-rent theory and urban land use of Butwal Urban Area, western Nepal. Third Pole J. Geogr. Educ. 2019, 18–19, 11–20.
  19. Batty, M. Accessibility: In search of a unified theory. Environ. Plan. B Plan. Des. 2009, 36, 191–194.
  20. Garreau, J. Edge City: Life on the New Frontier; Doubleday: Toronto, ON, Canada, 1991; Available online: https://www.worldcat.org/title/edge-city-life-on-the-new-frontier/oclc/23216043 (accessed on 5 September 2022).
  21. Martínez, F. Remains of the Soviet Past in Estonia. 2018. Available online: https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/29579 (accessed on 15 October 2022).
  22. Zhou, Y.; Tian, Y.; Jim, C.Y.; Liu, X.; Luan, J.; Yan, M. Effects of public transport accessibility and property attributes on housing prices in Polycentric Beijing. Sustainability 2022, 14, 14743.
  23. Davis, M.A.; Heathcote, J. The price and quantity of residential land in the United States. J. Monet. Econ. 2007, 54, 2595–2620.
  24. Aksoy, H.; Kaptan, S. Monitoring of land use/land cover changes using GIS and Ca-Markov Modeling Techniques: A study in northern Turkey. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2021, 193, 507.
  25. Wen, H.; Goodman, A.C. Relationship between urban land price and housing price: Evidence from 21 Provincial Capitals in China. Habitat Int. 2013, 40, 9–17.
  26. Liu, Y.; Zheng, B.; Huang, L.; Tang, X. Urban Residential Land Value Analysis: Case Danyang, China. Geo-Spat. Inf. Sci. 2007, 10, 228–234.
  27. Black, J.T.; Hoben, J.E. Land price inflation and affordable housing. Urban Geogr. 1985, 6, 27–47.
  28. Wu, H.; Jiao, H.; Yu, Y.; Li, Z.; Peng, Z.; Liu, L.; Zeng, Z. Influence factors and regression model of urban housing prices based on Internet Open Access Data. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1676.
  29. Hu, S.; Yang, S.; Li, W.; Zhang, C.; Xu, F. Spatially non-stationary relationships between urban residential land price and impact factors in Wuhan City, China. Appl. Geogr. 2016, 68, 48–56.
  30. Gorback, Key, Global Capital and Local Assets: House Prices, Quantities, and Elasticities. 2020. Available online: https://www.nber.org/papers/w27370 (accessed on 8 May 2022).
More
Information
Subjects: Urban Studies
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register : ,
View Times: 266
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 12 May 2023
1000/1000
Video Production Service