Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Dimitra Pomoni
 -- 2805 2023-02-24 11:57:07 |
2 update references and layout
Rita Xu
 Meta information modification 2805 2023-02-27 03:42:22 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Pomoni, D.I.; Koukou, M.K.; Vrachopoulos, M.G.; Vasiliadis, L. Hydroponic Cultivation. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/41635 (accessed on 24 April 2024).
Pomoni DI, Koukou MK, Vrachopoulos MG, Vasiliadis L. Hydroponic Cultivation. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/41635. Accessed April 24, 2024.
Pomoni, Dimitra I., Maria K. Koukou, Michail Gr. Vrachopoulos, Labros Vasiliadis. "Hydroponic Cultivation" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/41635 (accessed April 24, 2024).
Pomoni, D.I., Koukou, M.K., Vrachopoulos, M.G., & Vasiliadis, L. (2023, February 24). Hydroponic Cultivation. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/41635
Pomoni, Dimitra I., et al. "Hydroponic Cultivation." Encyclopedia. Web. 24 February, 2023.
Hydroponic Cultivation
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/en16041690

The increasing demand for food, the lack of natural resources and arable land, and the recent restrictions on energy consumption require an immediate solution in terms of agricultural activities. The soil loss, the crop/soil contamination, and the greenhouse gas emissions were the criteria for the environmental comparison of conventional agriculture and hydroponics. As for resource consumption, the water consumption rates (L/kg), energy consumption rates (kWh), and energy required (kW) were the criteria for comparing conventional agriculture with hydroponics.

hydroponics conventional agriculture environment water land

1. Introduction

The United Nations forecasts that the world population will reach approximately 9 billion by 2030 [1]. Other research indicates that the world population has doubled since 1960, while statistics indicate that the world’s population will reach 9.8 billion people by 2050 [2]; the same predictions have been made by the World Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) [3]. In the past 150 years, the world’s population has grown by 8.7 billion [4]. In 2016, global hunger grew to affect 815 million people worldwide, confirming the fragile state of global food security [5], and by 2030 it is expected that global food demand will have increased by up to 50% [6]. From 2005 to 2015, the rate of undernourishment declined; more specifically, the rate of undernourishment in 2005 was 14.5%, while in 2015, it reached 10.6% [2]. According to the same research, 947.2 million and 785.4 million people were undernourished in 2005 and 2015, respectively [2]. The same research indicated that the rate of undernourishment remained almost constant from 2015 to 2018, at 10.6% (2015) and 10.8% (2018), while the number of undernourished people grew from 785.4 million people (2015) to 821.6 million people (2018), representing an increase of 4.6% [2]. In 1996, the World Food Summit (WFS) decided that all people should experience food security [7]. Access (via natural presence, financial resources, and as social human beings) to adequate, safe, and nutritious food for people to satisfy their needs for nutrition, ensuring a healthy and active life, is an inalienable right [7].
Since 2000, academic publications mentioning the term “conventional agriculture” have become more frequent; more than 70% of such articles were published in the last ten years, establishing the term “conventional agriculture” as a topic in the literature [8]. Conventional agriculture involves high inputs of pesticides, herbicides, fertilizers, and chemical drugs, which pollute the soil and cause severe risks to human health and the environment [9]. In contrast to conventional agriculture, hydroponics can increase production without the extensive disposal of chemicals into the environment [10]. The nutrient solutions used in hydroponics mainly contain soluble inorganic salts [11].
Conventional cultivation requires soil, in contrast to hydroponics, which is a soilless form of cultivation [12] whereby the crop is submerged in a nutrient solution [13] or different types of substrates [10]. The rising demand for accommodation and the urbanization of agricultural land due to population growth has increased the need for disposable arable land for food production [14]. This situation has arisen because the abrupt growth in the world’s population has created a rapid increase in the demand for food production to meet people’s nutritional needs [15]. Currently, the agricultural sector accounts for 11% of the world’s land area, representing 1.5 billion hectares of land [16]. In contrast to conventional agriculture, hydroponics works in controlled environments and can provide higher annual yields [17], ensuring less land use than conventional agriculture.
Nowadays, the agricultural sector consumes 70% of the world’s water withdrawn from aquifers, streams, and lakes and is ultimately responsible for 13.5% of global greenhouse gas emissions [16]. On the other hand, hydroponics saves up to 95% of irrigation water compared to conventional agriculture [18]. In the case of hydroponics implemented as part of a closed system, the water consumption and nutrient supply are reduced [19]. A study on lettuce yield that compared hydroponics with conventional agriculture showed that the water demands were 20 ± 3.8 L/kg/y and 250 ± 25 L/kg/y, respectively, for this crop [17].
For conventional agriculture in greenhouses, most energy is spent on meeting the heating needs [20], as well as cooling and lighting [21]. However, studies have proven that hydroponics has a higher energy consumption than conventional greenhouse cultivation. A helpful example is a study of a hydroponic greenhouse (in the Mediterranean climate zone) that was shown to consumes 2559 kWh/year to cover its electricity needs for cooling and heating [22]. The main characteristics of this greenhouse were: a surface area of 24 m2, height of 3 m, south-east orientation, and polyurethane panel covering [22].

2. Advantages and Disadvantages of Hydroponic Cultivation

2.1. Advantages of Hydroponic Cultivation

Many countries have adopted hydroponic cultivation systems to serve their needs, with Latin America, Brazil, and Mexico considered the most prominent users [23]. Hydroponics as a production method is advanced and promotes large-scale cultivation in the absence of soil [24], ensuring the increased production of many crops at significantly higher yields through vertically accumulated trays to provide more space [25]. Hydroponic systems are efficient, industrial-type vegetable production systems. A plant’s growth rate in hydroponic cultivation is 30–50% faster than in soil cultivation [26]. For example, the growth rate of lettuce via hydroponics is 11 times higher than via conventional cultivation (Table 1) [17]. Food production by hydroponic methods is a well-known technique and its application is increasing worldwide [27], ensuring higher quantities in a shorter crop cycle and high-quality, high-nutritional-value products. This phenomenon has resulted from ever-increasing production, which has allowed the development of crop diversification and higher profits for producers [28]. This fact is important because it represents economic efficiency, which is the central goal of farmers [29][30]. The numerous products generated by hydroponic cultivation, the industrialization of its systems, the automation offered by its equipment, its applicability in smaller areas, and the increase in productivity make it an economically viable alternative food production investment [31].
The hydroponic growing method is flexible, and there are opportunities for its improvement using simplified models; such an attempt was made by Bradley and Marulanda [32]. They presented a simplified hydroponic model that required 25% of the land area used by soil cultivation for immediate hunger reduction [32]. Large cultivation areas are considered a disadvantage of conventional crops [17][33]. The combination of automatic fertilization and automatic soil control represents a benefit of hydroponics, because it ensures a clean planting environment and saves space due to the vertical production of multiple layers [34]. This allows better performance with the least possible land use [20]. Hydroponic cultivation methods using 10% less land, according to Barbosa et al.’s (2015) comparative lettuce production study, resulted in eleven-times higher yields than conventional cultivation methods [17]. Hydroponics is important for agriculture globally as an opportunity for cultivation in areas with no access to soil [23]; hence, it is applied in areas with adverse climatic conditions and a lack of arable land, producing food without soil [35]. These characteristics and benefits make hydroponics viable for urban areas [36]. Additionally, the phenomenon of growing crops in areas that could be expropriated is common, but hydroponics offers investment stability and reduces the high risks of this practice [37]. Finally, the benefits of soilless cultivation to soil protection are remarkable [38].
Hydroponic cultivation is prevalent in the modern agricultural world [39] as a clean and easy method compared to the traditional types of cultivation [40]. The absence of soil makes the crops quite clean, removing the need for washing [41]; at the same time, this agricultural system faces a low risk of contamination [42]. Additionally, hydroponics can effectively control the use of not only water but also fertilizers and chemicals [43], which are applied to combat diseases and pests [20]. On the other hand, conventional agriculture uses pesticides and nutrients extensively, which is another disadvantage of conventional crops [17][33]. Therefore, hydroponics is safer than open-field cultivation because it can apply natural barriers against specific bacterial agents and reduce contamination factors [44]. Hydroponic products are grown without pesticides, prompting consumers to trust them more and be willing to spend more on their acquisition, thus creating food security [45]. According to Russo and Scarascia Mugnozza [46], hydroponic cultivation in a greenhouse dramatically reduces the environmental impact compared to greenhouse soil cultivation due to the use of pesticides and fertilizers.
The advantages of this system are summarized as follows: the better control of plant nutrition, the more efficient use of space, and the possibility of reducing the application of fertilizers [36]. Hydroponics supports innovative, sustainable, and environmentally friendly crops [47], presenting a lower environmental impact and lower greenhouse gas emissions [20]. In addition, the benefits of hydroponic technology mean that their environmental impact and pollution rates are lower than their sewage disposal rates [48]. According to Martinez-Mate et al. [49], the gas emissions of soil crops and hydroponics crops are 0.23 kg CO2 equivalent and 0.11 kg CO2 equivalent, respectively. An existing study found that in terms of raw materials, using wood instead of zinc-coated steel structures definitely has environmental benefits, but using recycled plastics for pipes, grow benches, and containers also works very well [46].
Wastewater reuse is also considered to be extremely important in environmental protection and balance, as wastewater reuse reduces the pollution load in rivers, groundwater, and soil and provides a reliable water supply throughout the year [50]. Water recycling in the agricultural sector requires adequate and economically efficient approaches [51]. In hydroponics, treated wastewater and domestic wastewater, as a nutrient medium, are a viable solution [52]. Water saving and the possibility of reusing water [53] are considered vital features and benefits of hydroponic cultivation. A study by Grewal et al. [48] demonstrated that crops such as cucumber and tomato can be grown using 33% drainage water.
Another benefit of hydroponics is its ability to act as a subsystem in aquaponic systems. In recent years, aquaponics has become an exciting vegetable production approach for application near urban centres with minimal water consumption [54][55]. As a combination of aquaculture and hydroponics, it provides an environmentally and economically sustainable food production system by uniting two systems that normally operate independently [56][57][58][59]. This combined system (hydroponics and aquaculture) serves more directly the recycling of wastewater, as the output of one part of the system (wastewater) is used as the input (nutrients) of the other by creating the necessary conditions for the biological cycle [60]. The FAO [61] described aquaponics as a promising and fast-growing food production sector that already produces 50% of human-consumed fish and vegetables. The simultaneous recovery of nutrients makes aquaponics one of the most promising sustainable food production methods for the future [62].
Hydroponics, even as an independent method of food production, is considered more effective at optimizing resources than soil cultivation [63]. For example, the water resources are better managed, only 10% of water resources are used compared to conventional cultivation methods [64]. In hydroponics, the water consumption is seven times lower than in conventional greenhouse production and four times lower than in open-field cultivation [65]. As a result, hydroponics is self-sustainable and environmentally friendly [64]. According to Trang and Brix [66], the two main characteristics of hydroponics are the high efficiency of water use and its design plasticity.
Table 1. Advantages of hydroponic cultivation.
Source Sector Advantages of Hydroponics
Barbosa et al. [17] Better land use Reduction in land use by 10%.
Barbosa et al. [17] Higher crop yield Eleven-times higher lettuce yield with hydroponic cultivation.
Baddadi et al. [20] Irrigation water saving/fertilizer saving Hydroponics allows the controlled and efficient use of water, fertilizers, and chemicals.
Baddadi et al. [20] Better land use Better performance, less land use.
Baddadi et al. [20] Lower environmental impact Lower environmental impact and greenhouse gas emissions.
Bakhtar et al. [35] Better land use Hydroponics is applied in areas with adverse climatic conditions and a lack of arable land, producing food without soil.
Martinez-Mate et al. [49] Lower environmental impact Comparing soil crops and hydroponics crops, the gas emissions were 0.23 kg CO2 equivalent and 0.11 kg CO2 equivalent, respectively.
Sharma et al. [39] Clean cultivation Hydroponics is one of the most popular methods of modern cultivation, with its main characteristics being that it is clean and easy.
Croft et al. [23] Better land use Hydroponics is important for agriculture globally as an opportunity for cultivation in areas with no access to soil.
Müller et al. [24] Better land use Hydroponics as a production method is advanced and promotes large-scale cultivation without soil.
Link [25] Higher crop yield/high-quality food Hydroponics allows the multiplication of the number of crops to obtain higher yields.
Link [25] Better land use Hydroponics allows vertical crop cultivation and saves land use.
Joshi and Joshi [26] Higher crop yield The growth rate is 30–50% faster in hydroponic culture than in soil.
Borges and Dal’Sotto [28] Higher crop yield/high-quality food/economic viability Ever-increasing production allows the upward trend of crop diversification and higher profits for producers.
Souza, Toesca Gimenes, and Binotto [31] Economic viability Hydroponics ensures the financial viability of the investment and is an attractive alternative food production solution.
Bradley and Marulanda [32] Better land use Hydroponics responds to global hunger while using 25% less land than soil cultivation.
Wada [34] Clean cultivation/better land use Hydroponics ensures a clean planting environment and saves space due to vertical multi-layer production.
Rufí-Salís et al. [36] Nutrition control/better land use/fertilizer saving Hydroponics provides better plant nutrition control and more efficient land use and saves on fertilizers.
Rufí-Salís et al. [36] Better land use Hydroponics is a sustainable system of agriculture for urban areas.
Orellano et al. [37] Better land use/economic viability Hydroponics is a solution to the growing of crops on land that could be expropriated, providing investment stability and protecting growers from the high risks involved in this activity.
NOSB [38] Clean cultivation Hydroponics, as a soilless cultivation method, offers greater protection.
Coolong [41] Clean cultivation Hydroponics, as a soilless cultivation method, makes crops exceptionally clean without washing.
Lopez-Galvez et al. [42] Clean cultivation Low risk of soil and crop contamination.
Hussain et al. [43] Clean cultivation/fertilizer saving Hydroponics allows the efficient consumption of fertilizers and the reduced use of chemicals to control pests and diseases.
Orozco et al. [44] Lower environmental impact/clean cultivation Hydroponics is safer than open-field cultivation because it can apply natural barriers against specific bacterial agents and reduce contamination factors.
Phew et al. [45] Lower environmental impact/clean cultivation Hydroponic products are grown without pesticides, prompting consumers to trust them more and be willing to spend more on their acquisition, thus creating food security.
Russo and Scarascia Mugnozza [46] Lower environmental impact In terms of raw materials, using wood instead of zinc-coated steel structures has environmental benefits, but using recycled plastics for pipes, grow benches, and containers also works very well.
Russo and Scarascia Mugnozza [46] Lower environmental impact/fertilizer saving Hydroponic cultivation in a greenhouse greatly reduces the environmental impact compared to greenhouse soil cultivation due to the use of pesticides and fertilizers.
Li et al. [47] Lower environmental impact Hydroponics supports innovative, sustainable, and environmentally friendly crops.
Grewal et al. [48] Lower environmental impact Hydroponics is a beneficial technology with much lower environmental impacts and pollution rates, including effective sewage disposal.
Grewal et al. [48] Irrigation water saving Hydroponic cucumber and tomato crop cultivation could use 33% drainage water.
Sutar et al. [52] Irrigation water saving Hydroponics can apply treated sewage water, using household sewage as a nutrient medium.
Carmassi et al. [53] Irrigation water saving Hydroponics provides water savings and the possibility of reusing water.
Zou et al. [54]; Love et al. [55] Better land use/irrigation water saving/nutrition control Aquaponics is an interesting combined system of hydroponics and aquaculture for the production of vegetables near urban centres with minimal water consumption.
König et al. [56]; Goddek et al. [57]; Xie and Rosentrater [58]; Tyson et al. [60]; Adler et al. [59] Lower environmental impact/irrigation water saving/fertilizer saving/nutrition control Aquaponics combines aquaculture and hydroponics, providing an environmentally and economically sustainable food production system compared to the independent operation of the systems.
FAO [61] Higher crop yield Aquaponics is a promising and rapidly growing food production sector, already producing 50% of the fish and vegetables consumed by humans.
Suhl et al. [62] Nutrition control/fertilizer saving The simultaneous recovery of nutrients makes aquaponics one of the most promising sustainable food production methods for the future.
Gwynn-Jones et al. [63] Optimization of natural resource use Hydroponics is more efficient at optimizing resources than soil cultivation.
Alshrouf [64] Lower environmental impact/irrigation water saving Hydroponics is a self-sustainable and environmentally friendly system, using 10% less water in comparison to conventional agriculture.
Romeo, Blikra Vea, and Thomsen [65] Irrigation water saving Water consumption in hydroponics is seven times lower than in conventional greenhouse production and four times lower than in open-field cultivation.
Trang and Brix [66] Irrigation water saving/nutrition control Hydroponics is characterized by a high efficiency of water use and design plasticity.

3.2. Disadvantages of Hydroponic Cultivation

Despite the numerous advantages of hydroponics, there are some disadvantages related to the high initial investment required, meaning that interested farmers should be cautious at first [31]. The annual requirements for energy consumption amount to 95.3% of the total energy, whereas 4.7% of the total energy is dedicated to electricity needs (Table 2) [67]. The initial high investment, the high energy expenditure, the requirements for special technical knowledge, and the need for continuous assistance and monitoring may prevent the adoption of this cultivation method [68].
Table 2. Disadvantages of hydroponic cultivation.
Source Sector Disadvantages of Hydroponics
Vourdoubas [67] Higher energy consumption The annual requirements for energy consumption correspond to 95.3% of the total energy, with 4.7% corresponding to electricity consumption.
Souza, Toesca Gimenes, and Binotto [31] High initial investment Hydroponics requires a high initial investment.
Muñoz [68] High initial investment/higher energy consumption/required know-how Hydroponics requires a high initial investment, high energy expenditure, special technical knowledge, and continuous assistance and monitoring.

References

  1. United Nations. World Population Prospects: The 2000 Revision—Highlights; ESA/P/WP.165; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2001; Available online: http://enerpedia.net/images/2/2c/Wpp2000h.pdf (accessed on 28 November 2022).
  2. Gorjian, S.; Calise, F.; Kant, K.; Ahamed, M.S.; Copertaro, B.; Najafi, G.; Zhang, X.; Aghaei, M.; Shamshiri, R.R. A Review on Opportunities for Implementation of Solar Energy Technologies in Agricultural Greenhouses. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 28, 124807.
  3. Food and Agriculture Organization. The Future of Food & Agriculture: Alternative Pathways to 2050—Summary Version. Available online: https://www.fao.org/3/CA1553EN/ca1553en.pdf (accessed on 15 April 2022).
  4. Heilig, G. World Population Prospects: Analyzing the 1996 UN Population Projections. Available online: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/33896352.pdf (accessed on 18 May 2021).
  5. Food and Agriculture Organization. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World Building Resilience for Peace and Food Security. 2017. Available online: https://www.fao.org/3/I7695e/I7695e.pdf (accessed on 17 March 2021).
  6. Food and Agriculture Organization. Energy-smart Food for People and Climate: Issue Paper. 2011. Available online: https://www.fao.org/3/i2454e/i2454e.pdf (accessed on 2 April 2021).
  7. Hassanien, R.H.E.; Li, M.; Dong Lin, W. Advanced Applications of Solar Energy in Agricultural Greenhouses. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 54, 989–1001.
  8. Sumberg, J.; Giller, E.K. What is ‘conventional’ agriculture? Glob. Food Secur. 2022, 32, 100617.
  9. Chausal, N.; Saxena, J. Chapter 15—Conventional versus organic farming: Nutrient status. In Agronomic Soil Management Practices; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 241–254.
  10. Velazquez-Gonzalez, R.S.; Garcia-Garcia, A.L.; Ventura-Zapata, E.; Barceinas-Sanchez, J.D.O.; Sosa-Savedra, J.C. A Review on Hydroponics and the Technologies Associated for Medium- and Small-Scale Operations. Agriculture 2022, 12, 646.
  11. Ramazzotti, S.; Gianquinto, G.; Pardossi, A.; Muñoz, P.; Savvas, D. Good Agricultural Practices for Greenhouse Vegetable Crops; Food and Agriculture Organization: Rome, Italy, 2013; Available online: https://www.fao.org/3/i3284e/i3284e.pdf (accessed on 12 October 2022).
  12. Savvas, D. Hydroponics: A modern technology supporting the application of integrated crop management in greenhouse. Food Agric. Environ. 2003, 1, 80–86.
  13. Maharana, L.; Koul, D.N. The emergence of Hydroponics. Yojana 2011, 55, 39–40.
  14. Heredia, N.A. Design, Construction, and Evaluation of a Vertical Hydropoinc Tower; CORE: London, UK, 2014; Available online: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/20074627.pdf (accessed on 13 May 2021).
  15. Sims, R.; Flammini, A.; Puri, M.; Bracco, S. Opportunities for Agri-Food Chains to Become Energy-Smart; Food and Agriculture Organization: Rome, Italy, 2015; Available online: https://www.fao.org/3/i5125e/i5125e.pdf (accessed on 18 May 2021).
  16. Food and Agriculture Organization. The State of the World’s Land and Water Resources for Food and Agriculture—Managing Systems at Risk; Food and Agriculture Organization Publications: Rome, Italy, 2011; Available online: https://www.fao.org/3/i1688e/i1688e.pdf (accessed on 2 April 2021).
  17. Barbosa, G.; Gadelha, F.; Kublik, N.; Proctor, A.; Reichelm, L.; Weissinger, E.; Wohlleb, G.; Halden, R. Comparison of Land, Water, and Energy Requirements of Lettuce Grown Using Hydroponic vs. Conventional Agricultural Methods. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 6879–6891.
  18. Karașahin, Μ. Effects of different applications on dry matter and crude protein yields in hydroponic barley grass production as a forage source. Ziraat Fak. Derg. Süleyman Demirel Univ. 2014, 9, 27–33.
  19. Langenfeld, N.J.; Pinto, D.F.; Faust, J.E.; Heins, R.; Bugbee, B. Principles of Nutrient and Water Management for Indoor Agriculture. Sustainability 2022, 14, 10204.
  20. Baddadi, S.; Bouadila, S.; Ghorbel, W.; Guizani, A. Autonomous Greenhouse Microclimate through Hydroponic Design and Refurbished Thermal Energy by Phase Change Material. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 211, 360–379.
  21. Ahamed, S.; Sultan, M.; Shamshiri, R.R.; Rahman, M.; Aleem, M.; Balasundram, K.S. Present status and challenges of fodder production in controlled environments: A review. Smart Agric. Technol. 2022, 3, 100080.
  22. Bouadila, S.; Baddadi, S.; Skouri, S.; Ayed, R. Assessing heating and cooling needs of hydroponic sheltered system in mediterranean climate: A case study sustainable fodder production. Energy 2022, 261, 125274.
  23. Croft, M.M.; Hallett, S.G.; Marshall, M.I. Hydroponic Production of Vegetable Amaranth (Amaranthus cruentus) for Improving Nutritional Security and Economic Viability in Kenya. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 2017, 32, 552–561.
  24. Muller, A.; Ferré, M.; Engel, S.; Gattinger, A.; Holzkämper, A.; Huber, R.; Müller, M.; Six, J. Can Soil-Less Crop Production Be a Sustainable Option for Soil Conservation and Future Agriculture? Land Use Policy 2017, 69, 102–105.
  25. Link, C. Assessing the Potential Environmental Impacts of Controlled Environment Agriculture in Detroit and the Future of This Industry Based on Local Food Trends. 2017. Available online: https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/33826456/DUSTON-DOCUMENT-2017.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 26 September 2022).
  26. Joshi, N.; Joshi, A. Green Spaces: Create Your Own, 1st ed.; Notion Press Inc.: Chennai, India, 2018.
  27. Hickman, G.W. International Greenhouse Vegetable Production—Statistics a Review of Currently Available Data on the International Production of Vegetables in Greenhouses. Cuesta Roble (Oak Hill) Consulting: Mariposa, CA, USA. Available online: http://cuestaroble.com/statistics.htm (accessed on 18 May 2021).
  28. Borges, R.; Cardoso, T.; Sotto, D. Análise Econômico—Financeira de um Sistema de Cultivo Hidropônico. 2016. Available online: http://www.custoseagronegocioonline.com.br/numero3v12/OK%2012%20hidroponia.pdf (accessed on 20 June 2022).
  29. Su, Y.; Li, C.; Wang, K.; Deng, J.; Shahtahmassebi, A.R.; Zhang, L.; Ao, W.; Guan, T.; Pan, Y.; Gan, M. Quantifying the Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Multi-Aspect Performance of Non-Grain Production during 2000–2015 at a Fine Scale. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 101, 410–419.
  30. Zhang, L.-X.; Hu, Q.-H.; Wang, C.-B. Emergy Evaluation of Environmental Sustainability of Poultry Farming That Produces Products with Organic Claims on the Outskirts of Mega-Cities in China. Ecol. Eng. 2013, 54, 128–135.
  31. Souza, S.V.; Gimenes, R.M.T.; Binotto, E. Economic Viability for Deploying Hydroponic System in Emerging Countries: A Differentiated Risk Adjustment Proposal. Land Use Policy 2019, 83, 357–369.
  32. Bradley, P.; Marulanda, C. Simplified hydroponics to reduce global hunger. Acta Hortic. 2001, 554, 289–296.
  33. Killebrew, K.; Wolff, H. Environmental impacts of agriculture technologies. Evans Sch. Policy Anal. Res. 2010. Available online: https://econ.washington.edu/sites/econ/files/old-site-uploads/2014/06/2010-Environmental-Impacts-of-Ag-Technologies.pdf (accessed on 17 October 2022).
  34. Wada, T. Chapter 1.1 Theory and Technology to Control the Nutrient Solution of Hydroponics. In Plant Factory Using Artificial Light; Anpo, M., Fukuda, H., Wada, T., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 5–14.
  35. Bakhtar, N.; Chhabria, V.; Chougle, I.; Vidhrani, H.; Hande, R. IoT Based Hydroponic Farm. 2018. Available online: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8748447 (accessed on 17 October 2022).
  36. Rufí-Salís, M.; Calvo, M.J.; Petit-Boix, A.; Villalba, G.; Gabarrell, X. Exploring Nutrient Recovery from Hydroponics in Urban Agriculture: An Environmental Assessment. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 155, 104683.
  37. Orellano, V.; Azevedo, P.F.; Saes, M.S.; Nascimento, V.E. Land Invasions, Insecure Property Rights and Production Decisions. J. Agric. Econ. 2015, 66, 660–671.
  38. Giacomini, D.G.; Moyer, J. Production Standards for Terrestrial Plants in Containers and Enclosures (Greenhouses)—Formal Recommendation by the National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) to the National Organic Program (NOP). 2010. Available online: https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/NOP%20Final%20Rec%20Production%20Standards%20for%20Terrestrial%20Plants.pdf (accessed on 13 May 2021).
  39. Sharma, N.; Acharya, S.; Kumar, K.; Singh, N.; Chaurasia, O.P. Hydroponics as an Advanced Technique for Vegetable Production: An Overview. J. Soil Water Conserv. 2018, 17, 364.
  40. Ezzahoui, I.; Abdelouahid, R.A.; Taji, K.; Marzak, A. Hydroponic and Aquaponic Farming: Comparative Study Based on Internet of Things IoT Technologies. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2021, 191, 499–504.
  41. Coolong, T. Hydroponic Lettuce; University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Services: Lexinton, KY, USA, 2012.
  42. Lopez-Galvez, F.; Gil, M.I.; Pedrero-Salcedo, F.; Alarcón, J.J.; Allende, A. Monitoring Generic Escherichia coli in Reclaimed and Surface Water Used in Hydroponically Cultivated Greenhouse Peppers and the Influence of Fertilizer Solutions. Food Control 2016, 67, 90–95.
  43. Imtiaz Hussain, M.; Ali, A.; Lee, G.H. Performance and Economic Analyses of Linear and Spot Fresnel Lens Solar Collectors Used for Greenhouse Heating in South Korea. Energy 2015, 90, 1522–1531.
  44. Orozko, L.; Rico-Romero, L.; Escartin, E.F. Microbiological Profile of Greenhouses in a Farm Producing Hydroponic Tomatoes. J. Food Prot. 2008, 71, 60–65.
  45. Fu, T.-T.; Liu, J.-T.; Hammitt, J.K. Consumer Willingness to Pay for Low-Pesticide Fresh Produce in Taiwan. J. Agric. Econ. 2008, 50, 220–233.
  46. Russo, G.; Scarascia Mugnozza, G. LCA Methodology Applied to Various Typology of Greenhouses. Acta Hortic. 2005, 691, 837–844.
  47. Li, G.; Tao, L.; Li, X.; Peng, L.; Song, C.; Dai, L.; Wu, Y.; Xie, L. Design and Performance of a Novel Rice Hydroponic Biofilter in a Pond-Scale Aquaponic Recirculating System. Ecol. Eng. 2018, 125, 1–10.
  48. Grewal, H.S.; Maheshwari, B.; Parks, S.E. Water and Nutrient Use Efficiency of a Low-Cost Hydroponic Greenhouse for a Cucumber Crop: An Australian Case Study. Agric. Water Manag. 2011, 98, 841–846.
  49. Martinez-Mate, M.A.; Martin-Gorriz, B.; Martínez-Alvarez, V.; Soto-García, M.; Maestre-Valero, J.F. Hydroponic System and Desalinated Seawater as an Alternative Farm-Productive Proposal in Water Scarcity Areas: Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis of Lettuce Production in Southeast Spain. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 172, 1298–1310.
  50. FAO. Coping with Water Scarcity an Action Framework for Agriculture and Food Security; Food and Agriculture Organization Publication: Rome, Italy, 2012; Available online: http://www.fao.org/docrep/016/i3015e/i3015e.pdf (accessed on 26 March 2021).
  51. Egbuikwem, P.N.; Mierzwa, J.C.; Saroj, D.P. Evaluation of Aerobic Biological Process with Post-Ozonation for Treatment of Mixed Industrial and Domestic Wastewater for Potential Reuse in Agriculture. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 318, 124200.
  52. Sutar, K.A.; Wadkar, S.; Kiran, G.; Jadhav, S.; Turambekar, V. Study on Use of Waste Water in Hydroponic System instead of Nutrient Solution. Int. J. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2018, 6, 2035–2039.
  53. Carmassi, G.; Incrocci, L.; Maggini, R.; Malorgio, F.; Tognoni, F.; Pardossi, A. Modeling Salinity Build-up in Recirculating Nutrient Solution Culture. J. Plant Nutr. 2005, 28, 431–445.
  54. Zou, Y.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Guimbaud, C.; Wang, Q.; Fang, Y. Effect of Seasonal Variation on Nitrogen Transformations in Aquaponics of Northern China. Ecol. Eng. 2016, 94, 30–36.
  55. Love, D.C.; Uhl, M.S.; Genello, L. Energy and Water Use of a Small-Scale Raft Aquaponics System in Baltimore, Maryland, United States. Aquac. Eng. 2015, 68, 19–27.
  56. Konig, B.; Junge, R.; Bittsanszky, A.; Villarroel, M.; Komives, T. On the Sustainability of Aquaponics. Ecocycles 2016, 2, 26–32.
  57. Goddek, S.; Delaide, B.; Mankasingh, U.; Ragnarsdottir, K.; Jijakli, H.; Thorarinsdottir, R. Challenges of Sustainable and Commercial Aquaponics. Sustainability 2015, 7, 4199–4224.
  58. Xie, K.; Rosentrater, K. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Techno-Economic Analysis (TEA) of Tilapia-Basil Aquaponics. In Proceedings of the 2015 ASABE International Meeting, New Orleans, LA, USA, 26–29 July 2015.
  59. Adler, P.R.; Harper, J.K.; Wade, E.M.; Takeda, F.; Summerfelt, S.T. Economic Analysis of an Aquaponic System for the Integrated Production of Rainbow Trout and Plants. Int. J. Recirc. Aquac. 2000, 1, 15–34.
  60. Tyson, R.V.; Treadwell, D.D.; Simonne, E.H. Opportunities and Challenges to Sustainability in Aquaponic Systems. HortTechnology 2011, 21, 6–13.
  61. Food and Agriculture Organization. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture—Opportunities and Challenges; Food and Agriculture Organization Publications: Rome, Italy, 2014; Available online: https://www.fao.org/3/i3720e/i3720e.pdf (accessed on 26 March 2021).
  62. Suhl, J.; Dannehl, D.; Kloas, W.; Baganz, D.; Jobs, S.; Scheibe, G.; Schmidt, U. Advanced Aquaponics: Evaluation of Intensive Tomato Production in Aquaponics vs. Conventional Hydroponics. Agric. Water Manag. 2016, 178, 335–344.
  63. Gwynn-Jones, D.; Dunne, H.; Donnison, I.; Robson, P.; Sanfratello, G.M.; Schlarb-Ridley, B.; Hughes, K.; Convey, P. Can the Optimisation of Pop-up Agriculture in Remote Communities Help Feed the World? Glob. Food Secur. 2018, 18, 35–43.
  64. AlShrouf, A. Hydroponics, Aeroponic and Aquaponic as Compared with Conventional Farming. Am. Acad. Sci. Res. J. Eng. Technol. Sci. 2017, 27, 247. Available online: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/235050152.pdf (accessed on 6 April 2022).
  65. Romeo, D.; Vea, E.B.; Thomsen, M. Environmental Impacts of Urban Hydroponics in Europe: A Case Study in Lyon. Procedia CIRP 2018, 69, 540–545.
  66. Trang, N.T.D.; Brix, H. Use of Planted Biofilters in Integrated Recirculating Aquaculture-Hydroponics Systems in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Aquac. Res. 2012, 45, 460–469.
  67. Vourdoubas, J. Overview of Heating Greenhouses with Renewable Energy Sources a Case Study in Crete—Greece. J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 2015, 4, 70–76.
  68. Muñoz, H. Hydroponics Manual: Home-Based Vegetable Production System. Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture (IICA): San Jose, Costa Rica. Available online: https://repositorio.iica.int/handle/11324/11648 (accessed on 8 March 2022).
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Agricultural Engineering; Engineering, Environmental
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Dimitra I. Pomoni
,
Maria K. Koukou
,
Michail Gr. Vrachopoulos
,
Labros Vasiliadis
View Times: 437
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 27 Feb 2023
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Feedback