Your browser does not fully support modern features. Please upgrade for a smoother experience.
Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic. For video creation, please contact our Academic Video Service.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 handwiki Dean Liu -- 1377 2022-12-01 01:36:36

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Academic Video Service to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
HandWiki. In Re Roslin Institute (Edinburgh). Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/37522 (accessed on 26 September 2026).
HandWiki. In Re Roslin Institute (Edinburgh). Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/37522. Accessed September 26, 2026.
HandWiki. "In Re Roslin Institute (Edinburgh)" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/37522 (accessed September 26, 2026).
HandWiki. (2022, December 01). In Re Roslin Institute (Edinburgh). In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/37522
HandWiki. "In Re Roslin Institute (Edinburgh)." Encyclopedia. Web. 01 December, 2022.
In Re Roslin Institute (Edinburgh)
Edit

In re Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), 750 F.3d 1333 (Fed. Cir. 2014), is a 2014 decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit rejecting a patent for a cloned sheep known as "Dolly the Sheep"— the first mammal ever cloned from an adult somatic cell.

sheep roslin f.3d

References

  1. Is Dolly old before her time?, BBC News (May 27, 1999); Sally Lehrman, No More Cloning Around, Scientific American (Sept. 21, 2008). http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/353617.stm
  2. 750 F.3d at 1334.
  3. 750 F.3d at 1334-35.
  4. 750 F.3d at 1336 (citing Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303 (1980), and Funk Bros. Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co., 333 U.S. 127 (1948). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/447/303/
  5. 569 U.S._, 133 S. Ct. 2107 (2013).
  6. 750 F.3d at 1336-37.
  7. See Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co., 376 U.S. 225, 232-33 (1964). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/376/225/#232-33
  8. 750 F.3d at 1337.
  9. 750 F.3d at 1338.
  10. Dan Burk, Dolly and Alice, J. Law Biosci. (Oct. 16, 2015). A later version is available at [1] (Feb. 1, 2016). https://jlb.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2015/10/16/jlb.lsv042.full
  11. Gene Quinn, Dolly the Cloned Sheep Not Patentable in the U.S., IP Watchdog (May 8, 2014). http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2014/05/08/dolly-the-cloned-sheep-not-patentable-in-the-u-s/id=49471/
  12. U.S. Patent 4,736,866, issued Apr 12, 1988, to Harvard University. //www.google.com/patents/US4736866
  13. Miriam R. Swedlow, The Woolly-Mammoth in the Room: The Patentability of Animals Brought Back from Extinction through Cloning and Genetic Engineering, 11 Wash. J. L. Tech. & Arts 183 (2015). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/washjolta11&div=15&start_page=183&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=1&men_tab=srchresults#
More
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Others
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
View Times: 823
Entry Collection: HandWiki
Revision: 1 time (View History)
Update Date: 01 Dec 2022
Notice
You are not a member of the advisory board for this topic. If you want to update advisory board member profile, please contact office@encyclopedia.pub.
OK
Confirm
Only members of the Encyclopedia advisory board for this topic are allowed to note entries. Would you like to become an advisory board member of the Encyclopedia?
Yes
No
${ textCharacter }/${ maxCharacter }
Submit
Cancel
There is no comment~
${ textCharacter }/${ maxCharacter }
Submit
Cancel
${ selectedItem.replyTextCharacter }/${ selectedItem.replyMaxCharacter }
Submit
Cancel
Confirm
Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Academic Video Service