Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 -- 2432 2022-11-21 18:16:42 |
2 format correct + 2 word(s) 2434 2022-11-22 07:10:07 | |
3 format correct + 3 word(s) 2437 2022-11-22 07:11:49 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?


Are you sure to Delete?
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Tourountzis, T.;  Lioulios, G.;  Fylaktou, A.;  Moysidou, E.;  Papagianni, A.;  Stangou, M. Microbiome in Chronic Kidney Disease. Encyclopedia. Available online: (accessed on 16 June 2024).
Tourountzis T,  Lioulios G,  Fylaktou A,  Moysidou E,  Papagianni A,  Stangou M. Microbiome in Chronic Kidney Disease. Encyclopedia. Available at: Accessed June 16, 2024.
Tourountzis, Theodoros, Georgios Lioulios, Asimina Fylaktou, Eleni Moysidou, Aikaterini Papagianni, Maria Stangou. "Microbiome in Chronic Kidney Disease" Encyclopedia, (accessed June 16, 2024).
Tourountzis, T.,  Lioulios, G.,  Fylaktou, A.,  Moysidou, E.,  Papagianni, A., & Stangou, M. (2022, November 21). Microbiome in Chronic Kidney Disease. In Encyclopedia.
Tourountzis, Theodoros, et al. "Microbiome in Chronic Kidney Disease." Encyclopedia. Web. 21 November, 2022.
Microbiome in Chronic Kidney Disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a progressive disease, with high morbidity and mortality in adult population. Its incidence is increasing constantly, and approximately 10% of people are affected by some form of CKD, which is associated with almost 1.2 million deaths worldwide. Cardiovascular disease is the main cause of death, followed by infections and malignancies. The gut microbiome is a complex collection of microorganisms with discrete characteristics and activities. Its important role is not restricted to food digestion and metabolism, but extends to the evolution, activation and function of the immune system. Several factors, such as mode of birth, diet, medication, ageing and chronic inflammation, can modify the intestinal microbiota. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) seems to have a direct and unique effect, as increased urea levels result in alteration of the gut microbiome, leading to overproduction of its metabolites. Therefore, potentially noxious microbial uremic toxins, which have predominantly renal clearance, including p-cresyl sulfate, indoxyl sulfate and N-oxide of trimethylamine [Trimethylamine-N-Oxide (TMAO)], accumulate in human’s body, and are responsible not only for the clinical implications of CKD, but also for the progression of renal failure itself. Certain changes in gut microbiome are observed in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD), either when undergoing hemodialysis or after kidney transplantation.

microbiome microbiota dialysis

1. Microbiome in  Chronic Kidney Disease (at Pre-Dialysis Stages)

As chronic kidney disease (CKD) progresses, the urea concentration in blood gradually increases. As renal function declines, the gastrointestinal tract becomes the main route for urea excretion [1]. In advanced CKD, is observed impaired intestinal barrier function and chronicinflammation throughout the digestive tract. Urea diffuses from theblood into the gut lumen, stimulating the overproduction of urease containing bacteria, as an attempt to facilitate its catabolism [2]. Luminal urea is converted to ammonia, by microbial urease, and subsequently to ammonium hydroxide, that causes disruption of the epithelial barrier and increase of gut permeability, thus allowing translocation of gut uremic toxins, endotoxins, antigens and gut microorganisms or other microbial products into circulation. This phenomenon called “atopobiosis” (i.e., the microbes that appear in places other than their normal location), is associated with inflammatory diseases and is recognized as a route of endogenous infections [3]. Additional possible mechanisms contributing to the alteration of gut microbiome in CKD are associated either with the primary disease or comorbidities, such as presence of diabetes mellitus, medications, including phosphate binders, or eating habits, especially reduced fiber intake [4]. In several studies, the accumulation of uremic toxins is associated with the pathophysiology of CKD complications [5], such as vascular calcification, atherosclerosis [6], anemia [7], insulin resistance [8] and bone disorders. Whether these toxins are involved in immune system dysfunction in CKD is not well established [9]. Moreover, gut dysbiosis is starting to be recognized as a non-traditional factor for cardiovascular risk in CKD [10]. The association between kidney-gut axis and gut microbiome is bidirectional. The changes in gut environment cause gut dysbiosis [11]. The interaction between them is a bidirectional relationship, as CKD leads to a shift of healthy intestinal microbiome to a condition of imbalance between healthy and pathogenic bacteria called gut dysbiosis. The gut dysbiosis disrupts the epithelial integrity of intestine, intensifies inflammatory and immunological processes due to endotoxemia, gut derived uremic toxins, and acidosis which leads to progression and complications of CKD [12]. The specific CKD diet usually recommended is low in sodium, potassium and phosphate intake, resulting in reduced absorption of substantial nutrients, such as dietary fibers. Dietary fibers produce SCFA, which protect against damage of the intestine [13]. As renal function deteriorates, causes retention of uremic toxins. These toxins contains urea accumulate not only in the intestine but in the blood and promote the colonization of microbes that can use urea as an energy source [14].
In patients with CKD, the gut microbiota has already undergone substantial changes, regarding mainly the balance of the intestinal microbiome (Table 1). Normal colonic microbiota, including Lactobacillaceae and Prevotellaceae is significantly reduced, while Enterobacteria and Enterococci, normally present, though in small numbers, are increased up to 100 times in CKD patients [15]. Additionally, an overgrowth of Enterobacteriaceae, Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae observed together with a reduction of some Bacteroidaceae, Prevotellaceae and particularly Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus species, have been described in CKD [10].
As kidney function declines, indoxyl sulfate is increasing in the blood, due to its limited kidney excretion, leading to further deterioration of CKD [16]. In proximal tubule cells, indoxyl sulfate activates nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB). As a result, cellular proliferation is suppressed; senescence is induced and accelerated through induction of p53. Furthermore, fibrosis is stimulated by expression of transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) [17]. Quorum sensing is a bacterial regulatory mechanism that perceives and stimulates synchronized behaviors. It depends on bacterial or other cells population density. It operates through the secreted molecular compounds called quorum sensing signals [18]. These signals can be created either by pathobionts or by autochthonous microbiota. Those produced by gram negativebacteria, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa have negative immune related actions such as activation of mitogen activated protein kinase pathways. These induce NF-kB signaling and chemotaxis. Subsequently, they increase inflammatory genes expression [19]. Moreover, indoxyl sulfate induces an epithelial mesenchymal transition of tubular epithelial cells through activation of the renin angiotensin system, which contributes to renal fibrosis [20]. In addition, indoxyl sulfate induces Klotho depletion. Klotho is an anti-aging gene with renal protective attributes [21]. The mechanism associated with progression of CKD from p-cresyl sulfate is similar to indoxyl sulfate [17]. Furthermore, p-cresyl sulfate inhibits efflux transporters multidrug resistance protein 4 (MRP4) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) in proximal tubular cells, causing an intracellular accumulation of toxins, including p-cresyl sulfate [22]. TMAO may also contribute to the progression of CKD by promoting renal fibrosis, specifically tubulointerstitial fibrosis, and increasing expression of pro-fibrotic genes and kidney injury markers [17].

2. Microbiome in Hemodialysis

Proteobacteria (mainly Gammaproteobacteria), Actinobacteria and Firmicutes are increased in hemodialysis patients [15][23], although some investigators showed that Proteobacteria are significantly reduced in hemodialysis compared to peritoneal dialysis patients [3] (Table 1). Even though, pediatric hemodialysis patients have significantly increased levels of indoxyl sulfate and p-cresyl sulfate, no differences were observed in this taxa due to the production of these uremic toxins, namely Bifidobacteriaceae, Clostridiaceae, Enterobacteriaceae and Lactobacillaceae [26].
Apart from gut, other microbiomes have also been studied in hemodialysis population, which revealed an increased proportion of microbial colonization among hemodialysis patients. In the blood samples of almost 21% of hemodialysis patients (either from peripheral vein or arteriovenous fistula or central venous catheter), bacterial DNA has been found the species included Escherichiacoli, Staphylococcusaureus, Pseudomonasaeruginosa, Staphylococcusepidermidis, Enterococcusfaecalis, Proteusmirabilis and Staphylococcushaemolyticus [31]. Additionally, in other studies in ESRD (pre-dialysis and hemodialysis) the blood colonization was Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria, concerning the bacteria phylum. At genus level, the dominant bacteria were Escherichia, Shigella, Prevotella, Faecalibacterium, Bacteroides and Ruminococcus [24].
Dominant microbiomes’ families in ESRD (i.e., Clostridiaceae and Enterobacteriaceae) possess urease, uricase, indole and p-cresyl forming enzymes. As a result, more uremic toxins derive, which may contribute to uremic toxicity and inflammation. On the other hand, a reduction is found for Lactobacillaceae and Prevotellaceae, which produce butyrate forming enzymes, that can affect the production of butyrate, and has beneficial effect on the intestine [25]. A study showed that the SCFA (propionate, acetate, butyrate), selectively enlarge the pool of the regulatory T cells in the large intestine. The expansion of these cells by the SCFA, assists to downregulate inflammation by suppressing the operation of inflammatory cells [32]. The excessive ultrafiltration volume and/or intradialytic hypotension can cause episodes of transient intestinal ischemia. As a result, these may impair the function and permeability of intestinal barrier in patients on dialysis [33].
The highest levels of p-cresyl sulfate and indoxyl sulfate in blood are observed in hemodialysis patients. Clearance of indoxyl sulfate and p-cresyl sulfate by hemodialysis is limited, as both molecules display very high protein binding ratios (more than 95%), which cannot be successfully removed by hemodialysis membranes, leading to the accumulation of uremic toxins [34]. Hemodialysis reduction rates of these uremic toxins, even by using high-flux membranes, are estimated around 35%. Removal of these can be meliorated (to some extent) by raising the diffusion of the free, unbound molecules with super-flux membrane, increasing the dialyzer mass transfer area coefficient and dialysate flow, haemodiafiltration, daily sessions and addition of a sorbent to dialysate [35]. TMAO accumulates in hemodialysis. Peak levels are almost 40-fold than in normal population. This is principally due to two factors. First, TMAOs’ clearance in normal kidney is almost four-fold with respect to urea, while its clearance by dialysis is less than that of urea. The ratio of dialytic to normal clearance is much lower for TMAO than for urea. Secondly, the TMAO has lower volume of distribution than urea. So the inefficiency that results from the intermittency of classic dialysis treatment is larger than for urea [36].

3. Microbiome in Peritoneal Dialysis

As peritoneal dialysis, in most countries, is far less frequently used as a kidney replacement therapy, studies in this population are lacking. In patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis, there is a decrease in Actinobacteria and Firmicutes [28]. Peritoneal dialysis patients are unlikely to have Bifidobacteriumcatenulatum, Bifidobacteriumlongum, Bifidobacteriumbifidum, Lactobacillusplantarum, Lactobacillusparacasei and Klebsiellapneumonia [27] (Table 1). Both Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium participate in the regulation of gut microbial homeostasis and possibly reduce the constipation rate. So, these reduced populations can be associated to some adverse effects [3]. In a study from Wang et al., there was an increased prevalence of Pseudomonasaeruginosa in the fecal samples of patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis [27]. Pseudomonas is a possible agent for peritonitis, and responsible for almost 40% of catheter removal related to infection [3].
The renal clearance of indoxyl and p-cresyl sulfate are positively correlated with the renal clearance of urea nitrogen and creatinine. So, there is a significant role of residual renal function in the removal of these uremic toxins. Additionally, these solutes could not be removed efficiently, even after increasing the PD dose or altering the state of the peritoneal membrane. A study of 57 patients with end stage renal disease on peritoneal dialysis showed that sevelamer could be a helpful approach to reduce p-cresyl circulating levels in this population. This may also affect cardiovascular risk due to its anti-inflammatory effect [37]. Another study revealed that indoxyl sulfate serum concentration is considerably lower in patients on CAPD than those on low flux hemodialysis, a finding that can be attributed to residual renal function, as this was an independent parameter with inverse correlation with indoxyl sulfate serum concentration [38].

4. Microbiome in Kidney Transplantation

Transplantation in general, induces an unbalanced dysbiotic gut microbiome, characterized by a loss of microbial diversity and an increase in the Proteobacteria and reduction in Actinobacteria phylum [29][30][39] (Table 1). These microbial changes seem to persist up to 6 years after renal transplantation [30]. Proteobacteria (which are plenty in dysbiosis), can act as pathobionts. They normally show no pathogenic behavior in a healthy gut; however, under certain circumstances, they may become colitogenic pathogens and trigger local and systemic inflammation. These conditions are characterized by an impermanent increase in oxygen levels, which can favor the increase of facultative anaerobes, such as Proteobacteria [40]. Certain Proteobacteria induce a pro-inflammatory state linked with allograft rejection [39], while others report a reduction in the Bacteroidetes phylum during the rejection episode [29]. The main factors that seem to determine gut microbiome in transplant patients are immunosuppression and renal graft function. Mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus can reduce gut microbial diversity, in favor of pathobionts that can induce gastrointestinal toxicity [30][39].
In two studies in kidney transplanted patients, serum levels of indoxyl and p-cresyl sulfate decreased considerably following renal transplantation. The post-transplantation levels of these toxins were lower than in a non-transplant person with identical GFR. This is explained by the administration of immunosuppressants, antibiotics or other drugs (that can alter gut microbiome) or the transplantation procedure itself (that may change the composition of the colonic microbiota) [41][42]. Elevated TMAO levels are strongly associated with the degree of renal function in CKD and are normalized after kidney transplantation and remain low for at least 2 years [43].

5. Microbiome and Immune Reactions

Concerning the immune system development, the Bacteroidesfragilis polysaccharide A has the ability to cultivate T helper (Th) cell ratio (Th1/Th2). Dendritic cells and lymphoid tissues associated with the gut in the gastrointestinal tract components of Bacteroidesfragilis, migrate to lymphoid organs, and promotes Th1 lineage differentiation [44].
P-cresyl sulfate is associated to an immune deficiency condition of CKD, mostly correlated to the adaptative immune response. Indoxyl sulfate is related to the activation of innate and adaptative immune system, possibly responsible of the CKD associated inflammation [45]. In patients with CKD, a correlation is observed between p-cresyl sulfate and a reduction of B lymphocyte population, while there is not enough evidence on the effect of uremic toxins on naive or differentiated T cells [9]. P-cresyl sulfate and indoxyl sulfate cause an increased adhesion of neutrophils to endothelial cells and their extravasation [46]. Furthermore, p-cresyl sulfate reduces phagocytotic activities of monocytes, macrophages and dendritic cells, while in the latter it also reduces antigen presentation [47]. P-cresyl sulfate exerts a negative effect in Th1 lymphocytes, leading to reduced production of interferon-γ (IFN-γ) [48]. Indoxyl sulfate causes pro-inflammatory effects, endothelial dysfunction and bone disorders [49]. Indoxyl sulfate-induced pro-inflammatory macrophage activation is mediated by its uptake through transporters, including organic anion transporting polypeptides 2B1 (OATP2B1), encoded by the solute carrier organic anion transporter 2B1 (SLCO2B1) gene [50]. Indoxyl sulfate increases levels of tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and interleukin 6 (IL-6) and causes an exacerbation of the inflammatory condition through the promotion of oxidative stress [51].
TMAO accumulates in the heart, kidney, and other tissues, participating in various biological processes, such as activation of platelet aggregation, increase in foam cell formation, activation of inflammatory responses, and reduction in reverse cholesterol transport [52]. Accumulation of uremic toxins favors the development of immunological disorders in ESRD, mainly associated with T lymphocyte disorders [53]. Serum concentration of TMAO has been positively correlated with C-reactive protein levels and increased concentration of IL-6 and PAI-1, in peritoneal dialysis fluid, within PD patients. Furthermore, in addition to high glucose-induced TNF-α and chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2) expression in endothelial cells, TMAO may trigger TNF-α-induced P-selectin production in mesothelial cells, and thus can directly induce peritoneal mesothelial cell necrosis, together with increased production of pre-inflammatory cytokines, including CCL2, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1 [54].


  1. Chi, M.; Ma, K.; Wang, J.; Ding, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhu, S.; Liang, X.; Zhang, Q.; Song, L.; Liu, C. The Immunomodulatory Effect of the Gut Microbiota in Kidney Disease. J. Immunol. Res. 2021, 2021, 5516035.
  2. Lau, W.L.; Vaziri, N.D. The Leaky Gut and Altered Microbiome in Chronic Kidney Disease. J. Ren. Nutr. 2017, 27, 458–461.
  3. Simões-Silva, L.; Araujo, R.; Pestana, M.; Soares-Silva, I.; Sampaio-Maia, B. The Microbiome in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis. Pharmacol. Res. 2018, 130, 143–151.
  4. Hobby, G.P.; Karaduta, O.; Dusio, G.F.; Singh, M.; Zybailov, B.L.; Arthur, J.M. Chronic Kidney Disease and the Gut Microbiome. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 2019, 316, F1211–F1217.
  5. Lau, W.L.; Savoj, J.; Nakata, M.B.; Vaziri, N.D. Altered Microbiome in Chronic Kidney Disease: Systemic Effects of Gut-Derived Uremic Toxins. Clin. Sci. 2018, 132, 509–522.
  6. Opdebeeck, B.; Maudsley, S.; Azmi, A.; De Maré, A.; De Leger, W.; Meijers, B.; Verhulst, A.; Evenepoel, P.; D’Haese, P.C.; Neven, E. Indoxyl Sulfate and P-Cresyl Sulfate Promote Vascular Calcification and Associate with Glucose Intolerance. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2019, 30, 751–766.
  7. Chiang, C.-K.; Tanaka, T.; Inagi, R.; Fujita, T.; Nangaku, M. Indoxyl Sulfate, a Representative Uremic Toxin, Suppresses Erythropoietin Production in a HIF-Dependent Manner. Lab. Investig. 2011, 91, 1564–1571.
  8. Koppe, L.; Pillon, N.J.; Vella, R.E.; Croze, M.L.; Pelletier, C.C.; Chambert, S.; Massy, Z.; Glorieux, G.; Vanholder, R.; Dugenet, Y.; et al. P-Cresyl Sulfate Promotes Insulin Resistance Associated with CKD. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2012, 24, 88–99.
  9. Espi, M.; Koppe, L.; Fouque, D.; Thaunat, O. Chronic Kidney Disease-Associated Immune Dysfunctions: Impact of Protein-Bound Uremic Retention Solutes on Immune Cells. Toxins 2020, 12, 300.
  10. Sampaio-Maia, B.; Simões-Silva, L.; Pestana, M.; Araujo, R.; Soares-Silva, I.J. The Role of the Gut Microbiome on Chronic Kidney Disease. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 96, 65–94.
  11. Feng, Z.; Wang, T.; Dong, S.; Jiang, H.; Zhang, J.; Raza, H.K.; Lei, G. Association between Gut Dysbiosis and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Narrative Review of the Literature. J. Int. Med. Res. 2021, 49, 03000605211053276.
  12. Kanbay, M.; Onal, E.M.; Afsar, B.; Dagel, T.; Yerlikaya, A.; Covic, A.; Vaziri, N.D. The Crosstalk of Gut Microbiota and Chronic Kidney Disease: Role of Inflammation, Proteinuria, Hypertension, and Diabetes Mellitus. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2018, 50, 1453–1466.
  13. Plata, C.; Cruz, C.; Cervantes, L.G.; Ramírez, V. The Gut Microbiota and Its Relationship with Chronic Kidney Disease. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2019, 51, 2209–2226.
  14. Yang, J.; Lim, S.Y.; Ko, Y.S.; Lee, H.Y.; Oh, S.W.; Kim, M.G.; Cho, W.Y.; Jo, S.K. Intestinal Barrier Disruption and Dysregulated Mucosal Immunity Contribute to Kidney Fibrosis in Chronic Kidney Disease. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2019, 34, 419–428.
  15. Vaziri, N.D.; Wong, J.; Pahl, M.; Piceno, Y.M.; Yuan, J.; DeSantis, T.Z.; Ni, Z.; Nguyen, T.-H.; Andersen, G.L. Chronic Kidney Disease Alters Intestinal Microbial Flora. Kidney Int. 2013, 83, 308–315.
  16. Fujii, H.; Goto, S.; Fukagawa, M. Role of Uremic Toxins for Kidney, Cardiovascular, and Bone Dysfunction. Toxins 2018, 10, 202.
  17. Lim, Y.J.; Sidor, N.A.; Tonial, N.C.; Che, A.; Urquhart, B.L. Uremic Toxins in the Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease and Cardiovascular Disease: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Targets. Toxins 2021, 13, 142.
  18. Lin, L.; Zhang, J. Role of Intestinal Microbiota and Metabolites on Gut Homeostasis and Human Diseases. BMC Immunol. 2017, 18, 2.
  19. Salvadori, M.; Tsalouchos, A. Microbiota, Renal Disease and Renal Transplantation. World J. Transplant. 2021, 11, 16–36.
  20. Sun, C.-Y.; Chang, S.-C.; Wu, M.-S. Uremic Toxins Induce Kidney Fibrosis by Activating Intrarenal Renin–Angiotensin–Aldosterone System Associated Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e34026.
  21. Shimizu, H.; Bolati, D.; Adijiang, A.; Adelibieke, Y.; Muteliefu, G.; Enomoto, A.; Higashiyama, Y.; Higuchi, Y.; Nishijima, F.; Niwa, T. Indoxyl Sulfate Downregulates Renal Expression of Klotho through Production of ROS and Activation of Nuclear Factor-κB. Am. J. Nephrol. 2011, 33, 319–324.
  22. Mutsaers, H.A.M.; Caetano-Pinto, P.; Seegers, A.E.M.; Dankers, A.C.A.; van den Broek, P.H.H.; Wetzels, J.F.M.; van den Brand, J.A.J.G.; van den Heuvel, L.P.; Hoenderop, J.G.; Wilmer, M.J.G.; et al. Proximal Tubular Efflux Transporters Involved in Renal Excretion of P-Cresyl Sulfate and p-Cresyl Glucuronide: Implications for Chronic Kidney Disease Pathophysiology. Toxicol. In Vitro 2015, 29, 1868–1877.
  23. Chen, Y.-Y.; Chen, D.-Q.; Chen, L.; Liu, J.-R.; Vaziri, N.D.; Guo, Y.; Zhao, Y.-Y. Microbiome–Metabolome Reveals the Contribution of Gut–Kidney Axis on Kidney Disease. J. Transl. Med. 2019, 17, 5.
  24. Shi, K.; Wang, F.; Jiang, H.; Liu, H.; Wei, M.; Wang, Z.; Xie, L. Gut Bacterial Translocation May Aggravate Microinflammation in Hemodialysis Patients. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2014, 59, 2109–2117.
  25. Wong, J.; Piceno, Y.M.; DeSantis, T.Z.; Pahl, M.; Andersen, G.L.; Vaziri, N.D. Expansion of Urease- and Uricase-Containing, Indole- and p-Cresol-Forming and Contraction of Short Chain Fatty Acid-Producing Intestinal Microbiota in ESRD. Am. J. Nephrol. 2014, 39, 230–237.
  26. Crespo-Salgado, J.; Vehaskari, V.M.; Stewart, T.; Ferris, M.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, G.; Blanchard, E.E.; Taylor, C.M.; Kallash, M.; Greenbaum, L.A.; et al. Intestinal Microbiota in Pediatric Patients with End Stage Renal Disease: A Midwest Pediatric Nephrology Consortium Study. Microbiome 2016, 4, 50.
  27. Wang, I.-K.; Lai, H.-C.; Yu, C.-J.; Liang, C.-C.; Chang, C.-T.; Kuo, H.-L.; Yang, Y.-F.; Lin, C.-C.; Lin, H.-H.; Liu, Y.-L.; et al. Real-Time PCR Analysis of the Intestinal Microbiotas in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 1107–1112.
  28. Simões-Silva, L.; Araujo, R.; Pestana, M.; Soares-Silva, I.; Sampaio-Maia, B. Peritoneal Microbiome in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients and the Impact of Peritoneal Dialysis Therapy. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 173.
  29. Lee, J.R.; Muthukumar, T.; Dadhania, D.; Toussaint, N.C.; Ling, L.; Pamer, E.; Suthanthiran, M. Gut Microbial Community Structure and Complications Following Kidney Transplantation: A Pilot Study. Transplantation 2014, 98, 697–705.
  30. Swarte, J.C.; Douwes, R.M.; Hu, S.; Vich Vila, A.; Eisenga, M.F.; van Londen, M.; Gomes-Neto, A.W.; Weersma, R.K.; Harmsen, H.J.M.; Bakker, S.J.L. Characteristics and Dysbiosis of the Gut Microbiome in Renal Transplant Recipients. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 386.
  31. Bossola, M.; Sanguinetti, M.; Scribano, D.; Zuppi, C.; Giungi, S.; Luciani, G.; Torelli, R.; Posteraro, B.; Fadda, G.; Tazza, L. Circulating Bacterial-Derived DNA Fragments and Markers of Inflammation in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2009, 4, 379–385.
  32. Smith, P.M.; Howitt, M.R.; Panikov, N.; Michaud, M.; Gallini, C.A.; Bohlooly-Y, M.; Glickman, J.N.; Garrett, W.S. The Microbial Metabolites, Short Chain Fatty Acids, Regulate Colonic Treg Cell Homeostasis. Science 2013, 341, 569–573.
  33. Rysz, J.; Franczyk, B.; Ławiński, J.; Olszewski, R.; Ciałkowska-Rysz, A.; Gluba-Brzózka, A. The Impact of CKD on Uremic Toxins and Gut Microbiota. Toxins 2021, 13, 252.
  34. Leong, S.C.; Sirich, T.L. Indoxyl Sulfate—Review of Toxicity and Therapeutic Strategies. Toxins 2016, 8, 358.
  35. Niwa, T. Removal of Protein-Bound Uraemic Toxins by Haemodialysis. Blood Purif. 2013, 35 (Suppl. S2), 20–25.
  36. Hai, X.; Landeras, V.; Dobre, M.A.; DeOreo, P.; Meyer, T.W.; Hostetter, T.H. Mechanism of Prominent Trimethylamine Oxide (TMAO) Accumulation in Hemodialysis Patients. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0143731.
  37. Guida, B.; Cataldi, M.; Riccio, E.; Grumetto, L.; Pota, A.; Borrelli, S.; Memoli, A.; Barbato, F.; Argentino, G.; Salerno, G.; et al. Plasma P-Cresol Lowering Effect of Sevelamer in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: Evidence from a Cross-Sectional Observational Study. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e73558.
  38. Xie, T.; Bao, M.; Zhang, P.; Jiao, X.; Zou, J.; Ding, X.; Cao, X.; Yu, X. Serum Concentration of Indoxyl Sulfate in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients and Low-Flux Hemodialysis Patients. Blood Purif. 2019, 48, 183–190.
  39. Baghai Arassi, M.; Zeller, G.; Karcher, N.; Zimmermann, M.; Toenshoff, B. The Gut Microbiome in Solid Organ Transplantation. Pediatr. Transplant. 2020, 24, e13866.
  40. Shin, N.-R.; Whon, T.W.; Bae, J.-W. Proteobacteria: Microbial Signature of Dysbiosis in Gut Microbiota. Trends Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 496–503.
  41. Liabeuf, S.; Cheddani, L.; Massy, Z.A. Uremic Toxins and Clinical Outcomes: The Impact of Kidney Transplantation. Toxins 2018, 10, 229.
  42. Poesen, R.; Evenepoel, P.; de Loor, H.; Bammens, B.; Claes, K.; Sprangers, B.; Naesens, M.; Kuypers, D.; Augustijns, P.; Meijers, B. The Influence of Renal Transplantation on Retained Microbial-Human Co-Metabolites. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2016, 31, 1721–1729.
  43. Missailidis, C.; Hällqvist, J.; Qureshi, A.R.; Barany, P.; Heimbürger, O.; Lindholm, B.; Stenvinkel, P.; Bergman, P. Serum Trimethylamine-N-Oxide Is Strongly Related to Renal Function and Predicts Outcome in Chronic Kidney Disease. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0141738.
  44. Mazmanian, S.K.; Liu, C.H.; Tzianabos, A.O.; Kasper, D.L. An Immunomodulatory Molecule of Symbiotic Bacteria Directs Maturation of the Host Immune System. Cell 2005, 122, 107–118.
  45. Rocchetti, M.T.; Cosola, C.; Ranieri, E.; Gesualdo, L. Protein-Bound Uremic Toxins and Immunity. Methods Mol. Biol. 2021, 2325, 215–227.
  46. Pletinck, A.; Glorieux, G.; Schepers, E.; Cohen, G.; Gondouin, B.; Van Landschoot, M.; Eloot, S.; Rops, A.; Van de Voorde, J.; De Vriese, A.; et al. Protein-Bound Uremic Toxins Stimulate Crosstalk between Leukocytes and Vessel Wall. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2013, 24, 1981–1994.
  47. Azevedo, M.L.V.; Bonan, N.B.; Dias, G.; Brehm, F.; Steiner, T.M.; Souza, W.M.; Stinghen, A.E.M.; Barreto, F.C.; Elifio-Esposito, S.; Pecoits-Filho, R.; et al. P-Cresyl Sulfate Affects the Oxidative Burst, Phagocytosis Process, and Antigen Presentation of Monocyte-Derived Macrophages. Toxicol. Lett. 2016, 263, 1–5.
  48. Shiba, T.; Kawakami, K.; Sasaki, T.; Makino, I.; Kato, I.; Kobayashi, T.; Uchida, K.; Kaneko, K. Effects of Intestinal Bacteria-Derived p-Cresyl Sulfate on Th1-Type Immune Response In Vivo and In Vitro. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2014, 274, 191–199.
  49. Graboski, A.L.; Redinbo, M.R. Gut-Derived Protein-Bound Uremic Toxins. Toxins 2020, 12, 590.
  50. Nakano, T.; Katsuki, S.; Chen, M.; Decano, J.L.; Halu, A.; Lee, L.H.; Pestana, D.V.S.; Kum, A.S.T.; Kuromoto, R.K.; Golden, W.S.; et al. Uremic Toxin Indoxyl Sulfate Promotes Pro-Inflammatory Macrophage Activation via the Interplay of OATP2B1 and Dll4-Notch Signaling. Circulation 2019, 139, 78–96.
  51. Stockler-Pinto, M.B.; Saldanha, J.F.; Yi, D.; Mafra, D.; Fouque, D.; Soulage, C.O. The Uremic Toxin Indoxyl Sulfate Exacerbates Reactive Oxygen Species Production and Inflammation in 3T3-L1 Adipose Cells. Free Radic. Res. 2016, 50, 337–344.
  52. Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Ke, B.; Du, J. TMAO: How Gut Microbiota Contributes to Heart Failure. Transl. Res. 2021, 228, 109–125.
  53. Schaier, M.; Leick, A.; Uhlmann, L.; Kälble, F.; Morath, C.; Eckstein, V.; Ho, A.; Mueller-Tidow, C.; Meuer, S.; Mahnke, K.; et al. End-Stage Renal Disease, Dialysis, Kidney Transplantation and Their Impact on CD4+ T-Cell Differentiation. Immunology 2018, 155, 211–224.
  54. Zhang, L.; Xie, F.; Tang, H.; Zhang, X.; Hu, J.; Zhong, X.; Gong, N.; Lai, Y.; Zhou, M.; Tian, J.; et al. Gut Microbial Metabolite TMAO Increases Peritoneal Inflammation and Peritonitis Risk in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients. Transl. Res. 2022, 240, 50–63.
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to : , , , , ,
View Times: 511
Revisions: 3 times (View History)
Update Date: 22 Nov 2022
Video Production Service